Antibacterial activity of BMY-28142, a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin

BMY-28142, 7-[(Z)-2-(2-aminothiazol-4-yl)-2-methoxyiminoacetamido]-3- (1-methylpyrrolidinio)methyl-3-cephem-4-carboxylate, exhibited a well-balanced, extended-spectrum of antibacterial activity both in vitro and in vivo. Against Staphylococci and Streptococci, BMY-28142 was about four to ten times more active than ceftazidime and comparable to cefotaxime. Most Enterobacteriaceae were more susceptible to BMY-28142 than to ceftazidime, though strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were slightly more sensitive to ceftazidime. BMY-28142 showed potent activity against Gram-negative bacteria resistant to ceftazidime and/or cefotaxime. Bactericidal activity of BMY-28142 against 10 strains of P. aeruginosa was superior to that of ceftazidime. In bacterial infection models in mice, BMY-28142 was more effective than ceftazidime against three Gram-positive and three Gram-negative pathogens. The anti-pseudomonal in vivo activity of BMY-28142 was nearly comparable to that of ceftazidime. The blood levels and urinary excretion rates of BMY-28142 in mice were similar to those of ceftazidime.     

Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of cefepime (BMY-28142) with ceftazidime, cefuzonam, cefotaxime and cefmenoxime

Cefepime (BMY-28142), a new semisynthetic cephalosporin, was evaluated for in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities in comparison with ceftazidime, cefuzonam, cefotaxime and cefmenoxime. Cefepime showed a well-balanced, broad spectrum of activity against a number of clinical isolates collected in Japan. The activity of cefepime against Gram-positive bacteria was several times greater than that of ceftazidime, nearly comparable to cefotaxime and cefmenoxime, and slightly weaker than cefuzonam. Against Enterobacteriaceae, cefepime showed superior activity to the reference cephalosporins against Proteus inconstans, Providencia rettgeri, Morganella morganii, Citrobacter freundii and Enterobacter cloacae. The activity of cefepime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was nearly comparable to that of ceftazidime. Cefotaxime, cefuzonam and cefmenoxime were substantially less active against P. aeruginosa. Cefepime was more stable than cefuzonam, cefotaxime and cefmenoxime to various types of beta-lactamases from Gram-negative bacteria. The high in vitro activity of cefepime was reflected in its in vivo efficacy against experimental infections in normal and immuno-suppressed mice. Cefepime was the most effective among the cephalosporins tested against four Gram-negative bacterial infections.     

Cephalosporinase interactions and antimicrobial activity of BMY-28142, ceftazidime and cefotaxime

Cephalosporinases of Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter freundii were responsible for resistance to newer cephalosporins such as cefotaxime and ceftazidime but not BMY-28142. Interaction of these cephalosporins including hydrolysis, binding, inhibition, and inactivation with cephalosporinases from E. cloacae GN7471 and C. freundii GN7391 were studied. BMY-28142 was much more stable against the both enzymes than cephalothin, but more hydrolyzable than cefotaxime and ceftazidime at higher concentration such as 100 microM. Because of low affinity for the enzymes, i.e. large Km and Ki, the calculated hydrolysis rate of BMY-28142 at 0.1 microM was smaller than those of cefotaxime and ceftazidime, that explained the difference in activity against cephalosporinase-producing strains between BMY-28142 and cefotaxime or ceftazidime. The effects of cephalosporinase production on susceptibility of Escherichia coli omp mutants were examined using a plasmid having cephalosporinase gene of C. freundii GN346. Decrease in susceptibility of E. coli by cephalosporinase production was larger in the strain lacking outer membrane proteins (Omp) F and C, and smaller in the strain producing OmpF constitutively.     

Antibacterial and pharmacokinetic properties of M14659, a new injectable semisynthetic cephalosporin

In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities and pharmacokinetics of M14659 were investigated. In vitro activity of M14659 was superior to that of ceftazidime against Staphylococcus aureus. Against Gram-negative bacteria except Pseudomonas aeruginosa, its activity was almost equal to that of ceftazidime. M14659 was more active against P. aeruginosa including multi-drug resistant strains than cefsulodin, cefoperazone or ceftazidime. Affinities of M14659 for penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) of Escherichia coli and P. aeruginosa were 2 to 14 times higher for PBP-1A and PBP-1B than found for ceftazidime, and almost the same for PBP-3. In vivo activity of M14659 against S. aureus was superior to that of cefamandole, cefotaxime or ceftazidime. Against Gram-negative bacteria including P. aeruginosa, M14659 was 2 to 220 times more active than cefotaxime or ceftazidime. Plasma half-life of M14659 in mice was about 3 times longer than that of ceftazidime. M14659 administered intravenously to mice was mainly excreted in urine without metabolism, and its recovery rate was almost equal to that of ceftazidime.     

Comparative activity of ceftizoxime against aminoglycoside-resistant aerobic gram-negative bacilli

The in vitro activity of ceftizoxime was compared with that of other beta-lactam antibiotics against 331 aminoglycoside (AG)-resistant clinical isolates. Two hundred and six AG-resistant, beta-lactamase producing, R-plasmid harbouring Enterobacteriaceae strains had MICs ranging from 0.0125 to 0.063 mg/l. AG-resistant Escherichia coli (36 strains) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (19) had MIC 90 values of 8 mg/l. Proteus rettgeri and P. vulgaris as well as Morganella morganii, resistant to several AGs, had MICs ranging from 0.5 to 4 mg/ml. Against all six isolates of AG-resistant Salmonella enteritidis the MIC90 was 0.5 mg/l. Twenty-seven strains of Serratia marcescens, most of which were resistant to beta-lactam and AG antibiotics, had MICs ranging from 0.5 to 8 mg/l. The AG-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae producing several AG-modifying enzymes (AAC(3); AAC(2'); AAC(6'); APH(3')) showed MICs ranging from 0.6 to 4 mg/l. Against 10 AG-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing AAC(3), AAC(6') and APH(3') enzymes, the MICs ranged from 16 to 64 mg/l. In conclusion, ceftizoxime was equally or more active than cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftazidime and moxalactam against AG-resistant E. coli, Klebsiella, Morganella, Proteus, Serratia, Salmonella and R-plasmid harbouring Enterobacteriaceae. Ceftizoxime was less active than cefotaxime, moxalactam and ceftazidime against P. aeruginosa.     

舒巴坦与第三代头孢菌素联合对第三代头孢菌素耐药菌的体外抗菌作用研究

目的：探讨舒巴坦与头孢他啶、头孢噻肟、头胞呋辛1：1联合对头孢他啶或头孢呋辛耐药的革兰阴性杆菌及金葡球菌的体外抗菌增效作用。方法：用平皿二倍稀释法测定了舒巴坦与头孢他啶、头孢噻肟、头孢呋辛1：1联合的体外抗菌作用。结果：舒巴坦可以增强头孢他啶、头孢噻肟及头孢呋辛对革兰阴性杆菌的体外抗菌活性。舒巴坦可以使头孢他啶对大肠杆菌、阴沟肠杆菌、弗劳地枸橼酸杆菌、不动杆菌属、铜绿假单胞菌的MIC90降低4倍;使头孢噻肟对大肠杆菌、阴沟肠杆菌、弗劳地枸橼酸杆菌、不动杆菌属的MIC90降低2－4倍,但对金葡球菌、肠球菌及嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌无明显的增效作用。38.4%的头孢他啶耐药的大肠杆菌、45.3%的对头孢他啶耐药的阴沟肠杆菌、66.6%的对头孢他啶耐药的弗劳地枸橼酸杆菌及60％的对头孢他啶耐药的不动杆菌属对舒巴坦与头孢他啶（1：1）的联合制剂敏感。结论：舒巴坦与头孢他啶联合对头孢他啶耐药菌有30％－40％的抗菌增效作用。     

The in vitro activity of sulbactam combined with third generation cephalosporins against third generation cephalosporin-resistant bacteria

The in vitro activity of the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam combined with cefuroxime, cefotaxime or ceftazidime in the ratio of 1:1 was studied against ceftazidime- or cefuroxime-resistant Gram-negative rods and Staphylococcus aureus. Sulbactam enhanced the antibacterial activities of cefuroxime, cefotaxime and ceftazidime against Gram-negative rods. The MIC(90) of ceftazidime against Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was reduced 4-fold and that of cefotaxime against E. coli, E. cloacae, C. freundii and Acinetobacter spp. reduced by 2-4-fold. However, sulbactam did not enhance the activities of cefuroxime, cefotaxime or ceftazidime against S. aureus, enterococci and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. With the combination of sulbactam and ceftazidime at the ratio of 1:1, 38.4% of E. coli, 45.3% of E. cloacae, 66.6% of C. freundii and 60% of Acinetobacter spp. initially resistant to ceftazidime became susceptible.     

The in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftriaxone in comparison with nine other antibiotics

Summary

The results of a large three centre co-ordinated study into the in vitro susceptibility of bacterial clinical pathogens showed no significant evidence of regional variation within the U.K. towards the 10 antibiotics examined. The newer cephalosporins were highly potent and superior to other antibiotics against the Enterobacteriaceae, with ceftriaxone and cefotaxime the most potent. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, gentamicin was the most active, followed by ceftazidime, piperacillin and ceftriaxone; cefotetan was the least active. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus albus were most susceptible to cefuroxime and gentamicin, though most were also susceptible to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefoxitin. Streptococcus (Groups A and B), Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria spp. were susceptible to most agents other than gentamicin, but ceftriaxone and cefotaxime were overall the most potent. Ceftriaxone was the most active agent against Haemophilus influenzae. The newer agents were variable and relatively poor against anaerobes and only amoxycillin and piperacillin were significantly active against Streptococcus faecalis. The overall resistance level to the third generation cephalosporins was low.     

The in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftriaxone in comparison with nine other antibiotics

The results of a large three centre co-ordinated study into the in vitro susceptibility of bacterial clinical pathogens showed no significant evidence of regional variation within the U.K. towards the 10 antibiotics examined. The newer cephalosporins were highly potent and superior to other antibiotics against the Enterobacteriaceae, with ceftriaxone and cefotaxime the most potent. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, gentamicin was the most active, followed by ceftazidime, piperacillin and ceftriaxone; cefotetan was the least active. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus albus were most susceptible to cefuroxime and gentamicin, though most were also susceptible to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and cefoxitin. Streptococcus (Groups A and B), Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria spp. were susceptible to most agents other than gentamicin, but ceftriaxone and cefotaxime were overall the most potent. Ceftriaxone was the most active agent against Haemophilus influenzae. The newer agents were variable and relatively poor against anaerobes and only amoxycillin and piperacillin were significantly active against Streptococcus faecalis. The overall resistance level to the third generation cephalosporins was low.     

The resistance of recent clinical isolates against isepamycin, other aminoglycosides and injectable beta-lactams

Clinical isolates collected from clinical facilities across Japan in 1998 were tested against five aminoglycosides and three beta-lactams. The resistance of 50 strains each of methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter sp., Serratia sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus sp. (P. mirabilis 25 strains and P. vulgaris 25 strains) to the aminoglycosides isepamicin (ISP), amikacin (AMK), gentamicin, tobramycin and dibekacin, and to the beta-lactams imipenem, ceftazidime and piperacillin (all three known to be effective against P. aeruginosa) were investigated using a micro liquid dilution method with the following results: 1. ISP was effective against all strains except for 14% of MRSA, 2% of Proteus sp., and 4% of P. aeruginosa. 2. Six strains of MRSA were resistant to all eight drugs; however, in these cases ISP exhibited a relatively low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) compared to the other compounds. 3. Four strains of MRSA were resistant to all drugs except ISP. MRSA was the only isolate to demonstrate a resistance to seven or more drugs. 4. Twenty-one strains of MRSA and 1 strain of P. aeruginosa were resistant to six drugs; however, all of these were susceptible to both ISP and AMK. 5. Against all strains tested, ISP generally exhibited a lower MIC compared to AMK. These results suggest that, even ten years after its entering the market, ISP is still an aminoglycoside having a high anti-bacterial activity against a wide range of clinical isolates.     

In vitro activity of cefepime and cefpirome compared to other third-generation cephem antibiotics against gram-negative nosocomial pathogens

The in vitro activities of new expanded spectrum of fourth-generation cephalosporins, cefepime and cefpirome, were compared with those of three third-generation cephalosporins, cefoperazone, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone, that are commonly used in the treatment of serious infections caused by aerobic gram-negative bacteria. The agar dilution method described by the US National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics tested. 302 clinical isolates, representing a cross-section of Klebsiella and Enterobacter species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested. Cefepime was considerably more active than other antibiotics tested, against Klebsiella species and Enterobacter species, and demonstrated activity similar to ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime was active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa but was less potent against Enterobacter species. Cefoperazone and ceftriaxone were less active than ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefepime had slightly greater activity than cefpirome against the gram-negative bacteria tested. However, cefepime and cefpirome were found to be highly active against many resistant organisms that traditionally have been difficult to treat.     

国产头孢三嗪噻肟的体内抗菌作用研究

国产头孢三嗪噻肟对2株大肠杆菌感染小鼠的体内抗菌活性ED_(50)分别为0.0463mg·kg~(-1)和0.0386 mg·kg~(-1).与进口的头孢氨噻肟的ED_(50).0.0404mg·kg~(-1)和0.415mg·kg~(-1)相似.而比头孢三嗪噻肟的ED_(50)0.0617 mg·kg~(-1)和0.0561 mg·kg~(-1)低.国产头孢三嗪噻肟对2株克雷伯肺炎杆菌感染小鼠的体内抗菌活性ED_(50)为0.148 mg·kg~(-1)和0.147mg·kg~(-1).与进口的头孢三嗪噻肟的ED_(50)0.182mg·kg~(-1)和0.115 mg·kg(-1)相似.而比头孢氨噻肟的ED_(50)0.347 mg·kg~(-1)和0.799 mg·kg~(-1)明显的低.国产头孢三嗪噻肟对2株绿脓杆菌感染小鼠的体内抗菌活性ED_(50)24.579 mg.kg~(-1)和44.158 mg·kg~(-1)与进口头孢三嗪噻肟ED_(50)28.364 mg·kg~(-1)和34.818 mg·kg~(-1)相似.而比头孢氨噻肟ED_(50)>250和224.985 mg·kg~(-1)明显的低.对金黄色葡萄球菌感染小鼠的体内抗菌活性国产和进口头孢三嗪噻肟及头孢氨噻肟之间差异均没有显著性.     

Sisomicin, netilmicin and dibekacin. A review of their antibacterial activity and therapeutic use

Sisomicin is a naturally occurring aminoglycoside antibiotic produced by Micromonospora inyoensis, while dibekacin and netilmicin are both semisynthetic aminoglycosides. Dibekacin is 3',4'-dideoxykanamycin B and netilmicin is 1-N-ethyl sisomicin. In both cases, these modifications render the agents insusceptible to some of the enzymes found in resistant strains of bacteria which inactivate the parent compounds. Antibacterial activity: All 3 drugs show bactericidal activity against a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria (including E. coli, Enterobacter, Klebsiella and Proteus spp. and Ps. aeruginosa) and also against staphylococci; however, in common with other amino-glycosides, streptococci are usually resistant (except when beta-lactam antibiotics are used in combination) and anaerobic organisms are not sensitive. Sisomicin is closely related structurally to gentamicin Cla, but in vitro studies have shown it to have superior activity to gentamicin against Ps. aeruginosa, closely paralleling the activity of tobramycin, while still possessing the high activity of gentamicin against Serratia and other Gram-negative rods. However, sisomicin is inactivated by virtually all bacterial enzymes which inactivate gentamicin and tobramycin. Nevertheless, it retains useful activity against a number of gentamicin-resistant strains of Ps. aeruginosa which are resistant by non-enzymatic (possibly permeability barrier) mechanisms; in this respect it closely resembles tobramycin. Dibekacin closely resembles tobramycin structurally and in vitro it seems to have a very similar antibacterial spectrum, including activity against some strains of Ps. aeruginosa resistant to gentamicin. Netilmicin has a generally broader antibacterial spectrum than gentamicin, tobramycin, sisomicin or debekacin and is resistant to inactivation by phosphorylating and adenylylating enzymes; however, it is inactivated by all acetylases, apart from acetylase 3-I. Its spectrum is therefore not as wide as that of amikacin against 'gentamicin-resistant' strains. Nonetheless, it is intrinsically more active than amikacin, weight-for-weight, against sensitive strains, apart possibly from Ps. aeruginosa. In fact, its activity against species of the Enterobacteriaceae and staphylococci sensitive to gentamicin is of the same order as the latter and possibly better for Klebsiella-Enterobacter species. All 3 agents show marked antibacterial synergy with a variety of beta-lactam antibiotics against a range of bacteria. Pharmacokinetically, sisomicin, netilmicin and dibekacin all behave like gentamicin. All 3 drugs are excreted in the urine unchanged and have beta-phase elimination half-lives of around 2 to     

Nocardicin A, a new monocyclic beta-lactam antibiotic III. In vitro evaluation.

Nocardicin A, a new monocyclic beta-lactam antibiotic, exerts a comparatively potent antimicrobial activity against gram-negative organisms, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the indole-positive and indole-negative Proteus groups (except Pr. morganii), Serratia marcescens and the Neisseria groups. The in vitro antimicrobial activity of nocardicin A against clinical isolates of Ps. aeruginosa was about twice that of carbenicillin. The mean MICs of nocardicin A for Pr. mirabilis, Pr. rettgeri and Pr. inconstans ranged from 3.13 to 12.5 microgram/ml and were 25 similar to 50 microgram/ml for Pr. vulgaris. Nocardicin A in concentrations of 12.5 similar to 50 microgram/ml inhibited 30 strains (48 percent) of S. marcescens usually resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics. However, nocardicin A had no significant in vitro activity against Staphylococci and Escherichia coli. No cross-resistance was seen between nocardicin A and other beta-lactam antibiotics. This antibiotic was stable to beta-lactamase. The in vitro activity of nocardicin A against Ps. aeruginosa and Pr. mirabilis was greatly influenced by the assay media used. Nocardicin A was bactericidal and appeared to act synergistically with serum bactericidal factors against Ps. aeruginosa and with polymorphonuclear leukocytes against Ps. aeruginosa, E. coli and Pr. vulgaris. The bactericidal activity of nocardicin A against the above 3 organisms, therefore, increased markedly in the presence of fresh serum and polymorphonuclear leukocytes.     

In vitro activity of netilmicin and cefotaxime compared to that of other aminoglycosides

In vitro activity of netilmicin, cefotaxime, amikacin, dibekacin, gentamicin and tobramicin was compared against clinical isolates in Antibiotic Medium 3 at pH 7.1 and human plasma water at pH 7.8. Except against Pseudomonas aeruginosa the aminoglycosides were generally more active in plasma water than in broth. Against P. aeruginosa higher concentrations were required to inhibit or kill the strain in the plasma water. Cefotaxime was not tested against these organisms. Against E. coli, K. pneumoniae and Proteus species cefotaxime was found to be more active than the aminoglucosides, both in broth and plasma water. Its activity against Staph. aureus was markedly less than that of the aminoglycosides. Tobramicin showed a higher activity in plasma water only against Proteus species.     

In vitro combination effects of astromicin and beta-lactam antibiotics against CFS-sensitive and CFS-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In vitro synergistic activity

We investigated in vitro synergistic activity of astromicin (ASTM) combined with beta-lactam antibiotics (cefsulodin (CFS), cefoperazone (CPZ), ceftazidime (CAZ), piperacillin (PIPC) and fosfomycin (FOM) against fresh clinical isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which consisted of 13 CFS sensitive (MIC less than or equal to 3.13 micrograms/ml) and 19 CFS resistant (MIC greater than or equal to 400 micrograms/ml) strains according to the FIC index. Against CFS-sensitive P. aeruginosa, ASTM showed good synergistic activities when combined with PIPC (54%), CAZ (38%), CPZ (23%) and CFS (8%). Against CFS-resistant P. aeruginosa, ASTM also showed high synergistic activities when combined with CAZ (63%), CPZ (47%), PIPC (37%) and CFS (11%). Among the CFS-resistant P. aeruginosa, one clinical isolate showed a high sensitivity (MIC0.78 micrograms/ml) against ASTM alone.     

Cefclidin (E1040), a novel cephalosporin: lack of selection of beta-lactamase overproducing mutants in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model system.

The bactericidal activity of cefclidin (E1040), a new cephalosporin, against a clinical strain of Citrobacter freundii was compared with that of ceftazidime in a two-compartment in vitro pharmacokinetic model system designed to simulate plasma concentrations in humans for 12 hours after intravenous administration of a 1 g dose. Both cefclidin and ceftazidime showed rapid bactericidal activity against C. freundii. However, during the simulation of ceftazidime treatment, regrowth was observed after two hours and a subpopulation emerged which was resistant to ceftazidime. Neither regrowth nor the emergence of resistant mutants was observed with cefclidin during the 12-hour simulation. The ceftazidime-resistant mutants constitutively overproduced beta-lactamase at levels which were about 500-fold higher than that of the parent wild-type strain. Against this beta-lactamase overproducing mutant, no bactericidal activity of ceftazidime was observed in the in vitro model system, whereas the bactericidal activity of cefclidin was observed during the 12-hour period. The emergence of Enterobacter cloacae mutants derepressed for beta-lactamase production was also observed with ceftazidime but not cefclidin. The affinity of cefclidin for the beta-lactamase isolated from these mutants was lower than that of ceftazidime, and the kinetic parameters of enzymatic hydrolysis showed that cefclidin was hydrolyzed more slowly at a low concentration (0.2 microM) than was ceftazidime. It is suggested that the high activity of cefclidin against strains derepressed for beta-lactamase plays a major role in the absence of emergence of resistant mutants.     

Antibacterial activity of aztreonam: a synthetic monobactam. A comparative study with thirteen other antibiotics

The in vitro activity of aztreoman (SQ 26, 776), a new monocyclic beta-lactam antimicrobial agent, was determined against 1720 bacteria, all clinical isolates, and compared with that of thirteen beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics. Aztreonam inhibited 90% of Citrobacter diversus, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter agglomerans, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus morganii, Proteus rettgeri, Proteus vulgaris and Salmonella sp. by less than or equal to 0.4 micrograms ml-1. This activity was superior to moxalactam, piperacillin, cefamandole, cefoperazone, cefoxitin, cefsulodin, ceftazidime and aminoglycoside antibiotics. Aztreonam was as active as moxalactam against Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae and Shigella species. Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains resistant to moxalactam, piperacillin, cefamandole, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cefsulodin and ceftazidime were inhibited by aztreonam 50% by 6.3 micrograms ml-1 and 90% by 16 micrograms ml-1. Aztreonam was as active as ceftazidime against Serratia marcescens, all strains were inhibited by 3.1 micrograms ml-1 and 90% by 1.6 micrograms ml-1. There was no major difference between MBC and MIC values of aztreonam and the effect of inoculum size upon MIC values was observed at 10(7) CFU.     

In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of the new semisynthetic cephalosporin cefpirome

Cefpirome (HR 810), a new semisynthetic cephalosporin derivative, was found to have a broad antibacterial spectrum against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Against Staphylococcus aureus, cefpirome was more active than not only cefotaxime and ceftazidime but also cefotiam. Against gram-negative bacteria, especially, Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter freundii, it was also more active than the other antibiotics tested, but against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it was less active than ceftazidime. Cefpirome was stable to hydrolysis by the common plasmid mediated beta-lactamases and was stable to the action of chromosomal cephalosporinases. But it was slightly hydrolyzed by both Rms 213 mediated penicillinase and oxyiminocephalosporinases produced by Proteus vulgaris and Pseudomonas cepacia. When cefpirome was administered subcutaneously to mice experimentally infected with Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, its efficacy well reflected its in vitro potency.     

In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of meropenem, a new carbapenem antibiotic.

The in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of meropenem were compared with those of imipenem, ceftazidime, flomoxef, cefuzonam and cefotiam. Meropenem showed a broad antibacterial spectrum against clinical isolates of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Against Gram-negative bacteria, with the exception of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, meropenem exhibited the most potent activity among the drugs tested. It inhibited all 330 strains of Enterobacteriaceae at 0.78 mg/l. Meropenem was sensitive against several cephem-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, meropenem was four-fold more active than imipenem and eight-fold more active than ceftazidime, with an MIC90 of 0.78 mg/l. The therapeutic effect of meropenem on systemic infection in mice was ten to twenty-fold less than that of imipenem against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, meropenem was as effective as imipenem on infections of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Meropenem was eliminated from mice plasma two-fold faster than imipenem, with a plasma half-life of 7.6 min. From the above results the authors concluded that meropenem is a promising drug for clinical use.