Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction by four different methods using 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT in patients with small hearts: correlation with gated blood pool

AIM: To compare the currently available gated SPECT software programs, quantitative gated SPECT (QGS), Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb), Left Ventricular Global Thickening Fraction (LVGTF), and the recently developed Layer of Maximum Count (LMC) method with equilibrium Gated Blood Pool (GBP) scintigraphy in calculating the ejection fraction in patients with small hearts. METHODS: Twenty patients with small hearts (end diastolic volume <85 ml) were collected for the study. Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and planar GBP were performed for all patients. The four methods QGS, ECTb, and LVGTF and LMC were used for volumes estimation and ejection fraction calculation. RESULTS: ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences among the methods in ejection fraction estimation (P<0.0001). The mean ejection fraction by GBP was significantly overestimated by QGS and ECTb and LVGTF (P<0.0001, P<0.0001 and P=0.006, respectively). The mean ejection fraction by GBP was not significantly different from that by the LMC method (P=0.213). Ejection fraction measurements by QGS and ECTb yielded moderate correlation with GBP values (r=0.588, P=0.006; and r=0.564, P=0.010, respectively). The ejection fraction by the LMC method was marginally correlated but LVGTF showed a non-significant correlation with GBP (r=0.438, P=0.053; and r=0.155, P=0.515, respectively). Agreement analysis for ejection fraction estimation by QGS and ECTb demonstrated a non-significant correlation between the difference and the mean. The LMC method showed a non-significant trend to decrease the difference with GBP as the mean increased. However, the LVGTF method significantly increased the difference as the mean increased. CONCLUSION: The currently available gated SPECT methods have moderate to poor correlations in addition to wide agreement limits with gated blood pool studies in patients with small hearts. Improvement of these methods to achieve better results in such patients is recommended. The newly developed LMC method yielded better results in the group with small hearts but with low interchangeability with GBP studies.     

Evaluation of left ventricular endocardial volumes and ejection fractions computed from gated perfusion SPECT with magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of two methods

BACKGROUND: Two methods of computing left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (EF) from 8-frame gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were compared with each other and with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects underwent 8-frame gated dual-isotope SPECT imaging and 12- to 16-frame gated MR imaging. Endocardial boundaries on short-axis MR images were hand traced by experts blinded to any SPECT results. Volumes and EF were computed with the use of Simpson's rule. SPECT images were analyzed for the same functional variables with the use of 2 automatic programs, Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) and the Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb). The mean difference between MR and SPECT EF was 0.008 for ECTb and 0.08 for QGS. QGS showed a slight trend toward higher correlation for EF (r = 0.72, SE of the estimate = 0.08) than ECTb (r = 0.70, SE of the estimate = 0.09). For both SPECT methods, left ventricular volumes were similarly correlated with MR, although SPECT volumes were higher than MR values by approximately 30%. CONCLUSIONS: QGS and ECTb values of cardiac function computed from 8-frame gated perfusion SPECT correlate very well with each other and correlate well with MR. Averaged over all subjects, ECTb measurements of EF are not significantly different from MR values but QGS significantly underestimates the MR values.     

Comparison of two software in gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography, for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, in patients with and without perfusion defects

Emory cardiac toolbox (ECTb) and quantitative gated single photon emission tomography - SPET (QGS) software are the two most often used techniques for automatic calculation of left ventricular volumes (LVV) and ejection fraction (LVEF). Few studies have shown that these software are not interchangeable, however the effect of perfusion defects on performance of these software has not been widely studied. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of QGS and ECTb for the calculation of LVEF, end-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) in patients with normal and abnormal myocardial perfusion. One hundred and forty-four consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease underwent a two-day protocol with dipyridamole stress/rest gated technetium-99m-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile ((99m)Tc-sestamibi) myocardial perfusion (GSPET) (8 gates/cardiac cycles). Rest GSPET scintiscan findings were analyzed using QGS and ECTb. Correlation between the results of QGS and ECTb was greater than 90%. In patients with no perfusion defects, EDV and LVEF using ECTb, were significantly higher than using QGS (P<0.001), whereas no significant difference was noticed in ESV (P=0.741). In patients with perfusion defects, also ECTb yielded significantly higher values for EDV, ESV and LVEF than QGS (P<0.001). In tomograms of patients with perfusion defects, mean differences of EDV and ESV between the two software, were significantly higher than in tomograms of patients without defects (P<0.001), while for LVEF this difference was not significant (P= 0.093). Patients were classified into three subgroups based on the summed rest score (SRS); G1: patients with SRS < or = 3 (n=109), G2: patients with 4 < or = SRS < or = 8 (n=13) and G3: patients with SRS > or = 9 (n=22). One-way ANOVA showed that the mean differences of EDV and ESV values between ECTb and QGS between the subgroups were significant (P<0.001 for both parameters), while no significant difference was noticed between the subgroups, as for the mean difference of LVEF, calculated by the two software (P=0.07). By increasing SRS, the EDV and ESV values were overestimated to a higher level by the ECTb as compared to the QGS software. Linear regression analysis showed that the difference in LVV values, between the two software increased, when SRS also increased (P<0.001). In conclusion, correlation between QGS and ECTb, software was very good both in patients with and without perfusion defects. In patients with perfusion defects, calculated LVEF, ESV and EDV values are higher using ECTb compared to the QGS software. However, the more extensive the perfusion defect was, the greater the difference of LVV between these two software. For the follow up of patients, we suggest the use of a single software either QGS or ECTb, for serial measurements of LV function.     

Validation of quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography and an automated scoring system for the assessment of regional left ventricular systolic function

Despite its ability to quantify regional perfusion and function, there is no established method for quantification of regional perfusion and function by myocardial gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to establish a quantitative index for regional perfusion and systolic function assessment using gated SPECT. Myocardial SPECT was performed at rest using (99m)Tc sestamibi with 8-frame gating in 62 consecutive patients. In addition to computation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a new computerized method for quantifying, displaying and automatically grading regional data was developed. Regional function was quantified as wall motion, regional EF, and imaged based, count based, and normalized per cent wall thickenings (%WTs). Regional perfusion was assessed as a relative per cent peak count. Data were displayed on a 25-segmented polar map and automatically graded with a 5-point scale, and then summed scores were calculated. These quantitative parameters were compared to data from radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) and contrast left ventriculography. Gated SPECT had high reproducibilities for calculating global and regional ejection fractions and %WT indices (r=0.811-0.984, P<0.0001), but measurement of wall motion was less reproducible (r=0.555, SEE=7.9, P<0.011). LVEF estimated by gated SPECT and summed perfusion scores correlated closely (P<0.0001) with angiographic LVEF. Among the summed function indices that correlated closely with LVEF, normalized %WT had the closest correlations with LVEF estimated by RNV (r=0.657, P<0.0001) and by gated SPECT (r=0.778, P<0.0001). Assessment by visual reviewing of cine-mode playback or by normalized %WT had greater overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detecting impaired regional function among the functional parameters: 71%, 79%, 63% and 84% for cine format analysis, and 78%, 73%, 59% and 87% for normalized %WT, respectively. Thus, besides LVEF, quantitative gated SPECT can provide reproducible and reliable quantitative data on regional perfusion and function. Automated summed scores obtained by gated SPECT can reflect integrated abnormalities of regional perfusion and function of the left ventricle. Both visual analyses by cine-mode display and a functional map of normalized wall thickening have greater diagnostic values for detecting regional function deficit related to coronary artery disease.     

Comparison between ECTb and QGS for assessment of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT

BACKGROUND: The most widely distributed software packages to compute left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) from gated perfusion tomograms are QGS and the Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb). Because LV modeling and time sampling differ between the algorithms, it is necessary to document relationships between values produced by them and to establish normal limits individually for each software package in order to interpret results obtained for individual patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Gated single photon emission computed tomography technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion studies were collected and analyzed for 246 patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. QGS and ECTb values of ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume were found to correlate linearly (r = 0.90, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively), but EF and EDV were significantly lower for QGS than with ECTb (53% +/- 13% vs 61% +/- 13 and 102 +/- 45 mL vs 114 +/- 50 mL, respectively). To compare calculations for healthy subjects between the two software packages, data were also selected for 50 other patients at low likelihood for coronary artery disease, for whom EF and EDV were significantly lower for QGS compared with ECTb (62% +/- 9% vs 67% +/- 8% and 84 +/- 26 mL vs 105 +/- 33 mL, respectively). The ECTb lower limit was 51% for EF and the upper limits were 171 mL for EDV and 59 mL/m(2) for mass-indexed EDV, compared with limits of 44%, 137 mL, and 47 mL/m(2) for QGS. CONCLUSIONS: Although correlations were strong between the two methods of computing LV functional values, statistical scatter was substantial and significant biases and trends observed. Therefore, when both software packages are used at the same site, it will be important to take these differences into consideration and to apply normal limits specific to each set of algorithms.     

Preoperative risk stratification using stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with electrocardiographic gating.

This study was designed to assess the prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion SPECT with electrocardiographic (ECG) gating in patients undergoing noncardiac surgical treatment. METHODS: The study included 481 consecutive patients who underwent noncardiac surgery and had been referred for preoperative myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Myocardial scintigraphy used (99m)Tc-labeled perfusion agents and dipyridamole stress with ECG gating, permitting qualitative and quantitative analyses of both myocardial perfusion and cardiac function. Reconstructed perfusion images were analyzed qualitatively and semiquantitatively. The Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) program was used for gated SPECT analysis to calculate global left ventricular ejection fraction and estimate regional wall motion. We assessed the relationships between perioperative cardiac events and various predictors, including clinical risk factors, radionuclide perfusion, and functional variables. RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that age (P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.01), history of heart failure (P < 0.05) or perfusion imaging (P < 0.0001), and QGS analysis (P < 0.0001) yielded significant risk stratification. According to multivariate analysis, age, diabetes mellitus, perfusion imaging, and QGS analysis were independent predictors of perioperative cardiac events. The event rate was correlated with quantitative scintigraphic indices of perfusion images (rest perfusion and ischemic scores) and QGS analysis (global ejection fraction and the number of hypokinetic segments). Although QGS functional data offered no significant incremental prognostic value in patients with abnormal perfusion, it classified patients with normal perfusion into 2 risk groups (P < 0.0001). A combination of clinical risk factors, scintigraphic perfusion results, and functional data allowed further detailed risk stratification. CONCLUSION: Stress myocardial perfusion SPECT with ECG gating has an incremental prognostic value over conventional nongated stress perfusion imaging in predicting perioperative cardiac events.     

Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and tissue Doppler imaging: Comparison between QGS and ECTb software packages

Background

Recently, the phase analysis of gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has become feasible via several software packages for the evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. We compared two quantitative software packages, quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) and Emory cardiac toolbox (ECTb), with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) as the conventional method for the evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony.

Methods and Results

Thirty-one patients with severe heart failure (ejection fraction ≤35%) and regular heart rhythm, who referred for gated-SPECT MPI, were enrolled. TDI was performed within 3 days after MPI. Dyssynchrony parameters derived from gated-SPECT MPI were analyzed by QGS and ECTb and were compared with the Yu index and septal-lateral wall delay measured by TDI. QGS and ECTb showed a good correlation for assessment of phase histogram bandwidth (PHB) and phase standard deviation (PSD) (r = 0.664 and r = 0.731, P < .001, respectively). However, the mean value of PHB and PSD by ECTb was significantly higher than that of QGS. No significant correlation was found between ECTb and QGS and the Yu index. Nevertheless, PHB, PSD, and entropy derived from QGS revealed a significant (r = 0.424, r = 0.478, r = 0.543, respectively; P < .02) correlation with septal-lateral wall delay.

Conclusion

Despite a good correlation between QGS and ECTb software packages, different normal cut-off values of PSD and PHB should be defined for each software package. There was only a modest correlation between phase analysis of gated-SPECT MPI and TDI data, especially in the population of heart failure patients with both narrow and wide QRS complex.     

201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI gated SPECT in patients with large perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography.

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a major prognostic factor in coronary artery disease and may be computed by 99mTc-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) gated SPECT. However, 201Tl remains widely used for assessing myocardial perfusion and viability. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of both 99mTc-MIBI and 201Tl gated SPECT in assessing LVEF in patients with myocardial infarction, large perfusion defects and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients (43 men, 7 women; mean age 61 +/- 17 y) with a history of myocardial infarction (anterior, 26; inferior, 18; lateral, 6) were studied. All patients underwent equilibnum radionuclide angiography (ERNA) and rest myocardial gated SPECT, either 1 h after the injection of 1110 MBq 99mTc-MIBI (n = 19, group 1) or 4 h after the injection of 185-203 MBq 201Tl (n = 31, group 2) using a 90 degrees dual-head camera. After filtered backprojection (Butterworth filter: order 5, cutoff 0.25 99mTc or 0.20 201Tl), LVEF was calculated from reconstructed gated SPECT with a previously validated semiautomatic commercially available software quantitative gated SPECT (QGS). Perfusion defects were expressed as a percentage of the whole myocardium planimetered by bull's-eye polar map of composite nongated SPECT. RESULTS: Gated SPECT image quality was considered suitable for LVEF measurement in all patients. Mean perfusion defects were 36% +/- 18% (group 1), 33% +/- 17% (group 2), 34% +/- 17% (group 1 + group 2). LVEF was underestimated using gated SPECT compared with ERNA (34% +/- 12% and 39% +/- 12%, respectively; P = 0.0001). Correlations were high (group 1, r= 0.88; group 2, r = 0.76; group 1 + group 2, r = 0.82), and Bland-Altman plots showed a fair agreement between gated SPECT and ERNA. The difference between the two methods did not vary as LVEF, perfusion defect size or seventy increased or when the mitral valve plane was involved in the defect. CONCLUSION: LVEF measurement is feasible using myocardial gated SPECT with the QGS method in patients with large perfusion defects and LV dysfunction. However, both 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI gated SPECT similarly and significantly underestimated LVEF in patients with LV dysfunction and large perfusion defects.     

Two- and three-dimensional assessments of myocardial perfusion and function by using technetium-99m sestamibi gated SPECT with a combination of count- and image-based techniques

BACKGROUND: Although the myocardial gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) technique makes it possible to assess concurrent myocardial perfusion and function, quantitative methods for analyzing and displaying gated SPECT data in 2- and 3-dimensional presentations for regional and global cardiac assessment have not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: We have developed an automated quantitative method for assessing perfusion and function by means of technetium-99m sestamibi gated SPECT with a computerized technique combining count-based and image-based methods. We have examined its validity in 91 patients by comparing its results with those of conventional techniques: contrast left ventriculography and radionuclide angiocardiography. In addition to color-scale displays of regional function, simultaneous 3-dimensional presentations of regional wall motion and perfusion have been produced. High reproducibility of gated SPECT analysis with this algorithm was demonstrated; interoperator errors (%CV) were 2.6% to 5.5%, and good intraobserver reproducibility was confirmed by means of high correlation coefficients (0.954 to 0.989). Left ventricular volumes assessed by means of contrast left ventriculography and by means of the gated SPECT technique showed significant correlations (left ventricular end-diastolic volume, y = 1.01x - 9.7, r = 0.845, P<.001, standard errors of the estimate [SEE] = 14 mL; left ventricular end-systolic volume, y = 1.03x - 1.4, r = 0.902, P<.001, SEE = 6 mL). Left ventricular ejection fraction determined by means of gated SPECT with the new algorithm closely correlated with that determined by means of radionuclide ventriculography (y = 1.05x - 0.6, r = 0.891, P<.001, SEE = 3 %). These parameters quantified by means of the present method correlated closely with those derived from the QGS program (r = 0.926 to 0.987). CONCLUSION: In comparison with conventional techniques, myocardial gated SPECT with automated quantitative analysis provides accurate and reproducible data for global and regional function. Quantitative concurrent assessment of myocardial perfusion and function by using 2-and 3-dimensional representations appears to be superior to other modalities and to contribute to nuclear cardiology practice.     

Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function from quantitative electrocardiographic-gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial SPET

We have developed new software which can evaluate left ventricular (LV) diastolic functional parameters from a quantitative gated SPET (QGS) program. To examine its accuracy, we compared these findings with the LV diastolic functional indices obtained from gated radionuclide ventriculography (RNV). Twenty-four patients were selected for this study. Gated SPET with technetium-99m tetrofosmin was performed and the QGS program was used with a temporal resolution of 32 frames per R-R interval. The LV volume of each frame was calculated and four harmonics of Fourier series were retained for the analysis of the LV volume curve. From this fitted curve and its first derivative curve, we derived LV systolic functional indices, e.g. ejection fraction (EF), peak ejection rate (PER) and time to PER (TPER), as well as LV diastolic functional variables, e.g. 1/3 filling fraction (1/3 FF), peak filling rate (PFR) and time to PFR (TPFR). Within 5+/-2 days, gated RNV was performed and diastolic functional parameters were determined by the same method. No significant difference was observed between the variables calculated by gated SPET and by gated RNV. There was a good correlation between EF, PER, TPER, 1/3 FF, PFR and TPFR determined by these two methods (EF: r=0.95, P<0.0001; PER: r=0.87, P<0.0001; TPER: r=0.84, P<0.0001; 1/3 FF: r=0.87, P<0.0001; PFR: r=0.92, P<0.0001; TPFR: r=0.89, P<0.0001). Bland-Altman plots did not reveal any significant degree of directional measurement bias in any of the comparisons of gated SPET data and RNV data. It is concluded that, in addition to the conventional LV systolic functional indices, our program accurately provides LV diastolic functional parameters from gated SPET. Also, this program will be useful for detecting LV diastolic dysfunction in various cardiac diseases before LV systolic dysfunction becomes evident.     

Assessment of left ventricular function by thallium-201 quantitative gated cardiac SPECT

PURPOSE: Present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the measurement of left ventricular volume by quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) software using 201T1 and the effect of cutoff frequency of Butterworth prereconstruction filter on the calculation of volume. METHODS: The RH-2 type cardiac phantom and 20 patients with ischemic heart disease were studied. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated by the QGS software using the various frequency of Butterworth filter. These parameters were evaluated by Simpson's method using left ventriculography (LVG). RESULTS: The volume of the phantom calculated by QGS was under-estimated by 14%. In the clinical study, EDV and ESV measured by QGS were smaller than those obtained from LVG by 10%. When the cutoff frequency of Butterworth filter was 0.43 cycles/cm, the values measured by QGS were best correlated with those by LVG (EDV: r = 0.80, p < 0.001; ESV: r = 0.86, p < 0.001; EF: r = 0.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that 201Tl quantitative gated cardiac SPECT can estimate myocardial ischemia and left ventricular function simultaneously.     

Accuracy of the automated assessment of left ventricular function with gated perfusion SPECT in the presence of perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: Correlation with equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with automated methods allows the quantitative assessment of left ventricular function and perfusion; however, its accuracy must be defined for patients with large earlier infarctions and severe rest perfusion defects, in whom the estimation of endocardial and epicardial borders might be more difficult, even with automated edge-detection techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively compared the automated measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and volumes from rest-injected gated Technetium 99m (Tc99m) perfusion SPECT with equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA) in 62 patients and the assessment of regional function with echocardiography in 22 patients. Forty-six patients had an earlier myocardial infarction (mean defect size, 34% of left ventricle; SD, 12.7%; range, 8% to 56%); 27 patients had large defects (> or = 20% of left ventricle; LVEF range, 8% to 75%). LVEF, as determined with Cedars-Sinai software (quantitative gated SPECT), correlated well with ERNA (r = 0.941; y = 1.003x + 1.15; P<.0001; SE of the estimate = 6.3%; mean difference -1.3% for LVEF) in the entire study population and in the subgroups of patients with an earlier infarction, severe defects, and large infarctions (> or = 20% of the left ventricle). A correlation existed between gated SPECT and ERNA volumes (r = 0.882, y = 1.040x - 14.7, P<.0001 for end-diastolic volume; r = 0.954, y = 1.147x - 13.9, P<.0001 for end-systolic volumes with the count-ratio technique), but with wider limits of agreement. The exact segmental score agreement between gated SPECT and echocardiography for regional function was 79.8% (281 of 352, kappa = 0.682). CONCLUSIONS: Automated gated SPECT provides an accurate assessment of ejection fraction and regional function, even in the presence of an earlier myocardial infarction with large perfusion defects and significant left ventricular dysfunction.     

Regional wall motion and wall thickening visual scores from gated SPECT in anterior and infero-lateral myocardial infarctions

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the visual scores for wall motion (WM) and wall thickening (WT) of different left ventricular regions in patients with anterior and infero-lateral myocardial infarctions was evaluated using gated SPECT. METHODS: Ninety consecutive patients (79 men and 11 women; mean age 56 +/- 9 years) with previous myocardial infarction (33 anterior and 57 infero-lateral) were included. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions (EFs) were calculated from quantitative rest gated SPECT 99mTc tetrofosmin images by using the QGS automatic algorithm. Global and regional (anterior, septal, inferior and lateral) wall motion and wall thickening scores were calculated by consensus of three experienced observers. RESULTS: The correlation between EFs and wall motion and wall thickening scores was better for WM scores in anterior (r=0.904, P<0.0001) than infero-lateral infarctions (r=0.674, P<0.0001). Correlation between wall motion and wall thickening scores was also better for anterior (r=0.898, P<0.0001) than for infero-lateral infarctions (r=0.750, P<0.0001). Except in septal regions, WT scores of the different regions were higher than WM scores (P<0.05) but the statistical significance was higher (P<0.001) in inferior and lateral regions of infero-lateral infarctions. CONCLUSION: Visual global wall motion and wall thickening scores obtained by gated SPECT showed good correlation between them and with the EF, but differences were observed between regional wall motion and wall thickening, especially in inferior and lateral regions of patients with infero-lateral infarctions.     

Automated ejection fraction determination from gated myocardial FDG-PET data

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the potential of the automated calculation of the left ventricular ejection fraction from gated myocardial positron emission tomography (PET) scans. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 20 patients who underwent both gated fluorine 18 deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA). Gated PET data were analyzed by 2 independent programs (ie, quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography [QGS]) originally developed for gated single photon emission computed tomography studies and functional polarmap (FPM) originally developed for the analysis of (functional) dynamic PET studies. ERNA data were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: Both QGS and FPM left ventricular ejection fraction results correlated highly with ERNA (y = 0.90 x x-5.9, r = 0.86, P < .0001; y = 0.80 x x+3.3, r = 0.84, P < .0001, respectively). The correlation between FPM and QGS left ventricular ejection fraction results was even higher (y = 0.89 x x+8.6, r = 0.97, P < .0001). Bland-Altman plots showed systematic differences in the left ventricular ejection fraction of -9.6% +/- 7.5% (QGS vs ERNA), -3.8% +/- 7.8% (FPM vs ERNA), and -5.8% +/- 3.5% (QGS vs FPM). Further comparison of the left ventricular volumes revealed systematic difference between QGS and FPM. Our results indicate that the correlation between the different left ventricular ejection fractions shows little sensitivity to errors in the left ventricular volumes; however, the exact relationship is influenced by these errors. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the automated determination of the left ventricular ejection fraction from gated PET data has significant potential; its results are highly and significantly correlated with ERNA. However, the methods presented here require additional calibration before final accuracy and clinical applicability can be determined.     

Simultaneous assessment of myocardial free fatty acid utilization and left ventricular function using 123I-BMIPP-gated SPECT.

This study was designed to evaluate the methodological feasibility of 123I-labeled beta-methyl-p-iodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid (BMIPP)-gated SPECT to assess regional and global left ventricular (LV) function in comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi (methoxyisobutyl isonitrile [MIBI])-gated SPECT and first-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRNA). METHODS: Forty-four patients with stable coronary artery disease underwent rest BMIPP-gated SPECT (111 MBq, 60 s/step) and rest MIBI-gated SPECT (600 MBq, 40 s/step) within a week. From both gated SPECT studies, regional defect scores (DS), wall motion scores (WMS) and wall-thickening scores (WTS) were evaluated visually using 4-point scales for nine segments, and LV ejection fraction (EF) (%) was automatically calculated using Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) software. FPRNA was also performed on injection of MIBI. RESULTS: Exact agreement between the two gated SPECT studies was 84.1% (kappa = 0.706, r = 0.907, P < 0.0001) in WMS and 87.1% (kappa = 0.662, r = 0.884, P < 0.0001) in WTS. LVEF obtained from BMIPP-gated SPECT linearly correlated with those from MIBI-gated SPECT (y = -0.27 + 0.944x, r = 0.948, SEE = 5.00, P < 0.0001) and FPRNA (y = -7.32 + 1.042x, r = 0.919, SEE = 6.19, P < 0.0001). Even in 21 patients with mismatch segments (BMIPP DS > MIBI DS), agreement was considered to be acceptable in WMS (81.5%, kappa = 0.707, r = 0.853, P < 0.0001) and in WTS (76.7%, kappa = 0.526, r = 0.754, P < 0.0001), and correlation in LVEF remained good between BMIPP-gated SPECT and MIBI-gated SPECT (y = -1.24 + 0.955x, r = 0.938, SEE = 6.25, P < 0.0001) or FPRNA (y = -6.03 + 1.024x, r = 0.913, SEE = 7.38, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: BMIPP-gated SPECT can evaluate regional and global LV function with the QGS software. Therefore, BMIPP-gated SPECT offers the opportunity for simultaneous assessment of myocardial free fatty acid utilization and LV function.     

Comparison of 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with MRI over a wide range of values

The calculation of ejection fraction using gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been widely validated against a range of other techniques. There have been fewer studies validating left ventricular volumes. We compared quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction and end diastolic volume in 50 patients with a large range of ventricular dimensions. MRI data were obtained using a turbo gradient echo pulse sequence (TGE) in 17 patients and a steady state free precession pulse sequence (SSFP) in 33 patients. There was good correlation between ejection fraction and end diastolic volume measurements from SPECT and MRI (r=0.82, r=0.90, respectively) but the mean SPECT values were significantly lower (ejection fraction, 6.6+/-6.4% points; end diastolic volume, 18.4+/-25.4 ml) than those obtained from MRI. Bland-Altman analysis showed some large differences in individual patients but no trends in the data either in ejection fraction over a range from 15% to 70% or in end diastolic volume, range 75-400 ml. SSFP gave a larger difference for end diastolic volume measurement compared to SPECT than did TGE, although this difference did not reach significance. Both SSFP and TGE gave similar values for the difference between MRI and SPECT for the measurement of ejection fraction. We suggest that the difference in EF may be a result of 8 frames being used for gating in QGS but 12-18 for MR. Differences in volumes may be related to the different spatial resolution and the exclusion or inclusion of trabeculation and papillary muscles between SPECT and MRI. Differences between SSFP and TGE may be caused by differing delineation of the endocardial border, dependent on the particular acquisition sequence. In conclusion, QGS values correlated well with MRI, but a correction factor may be needed if direct comparison is made.     

Accuracy of ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated myocardial SPECT: comparison of 4 software programs.

Gated myocardial perfusion SPECT has been used to calculate ejection fraction (EF) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) and has correlated well with conventional methods. However, the comparative accuracy of and correlations across various types of gated SPECT software are not well understood. METHODS: Mathematic phantoms of cylindric-hemispheric hybrid models, ranging in volume from 34 to 266 mL, were generated. The clinical cases consisted of 30 patients who participated in a radionuclide angiography and gated blood-pool (GBP) study in addition to undergoing (99m)Tc-sestamibi gated SPECT. Four kinds of software, Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS), the Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECT), 4D-MSPECT, and Perfusion and Functional Analysis for Gated SPECT (pFAST) were used to compute EF and EDV, and the results were analyzed by multiple comparisons tests. Patients were classified into 4 groups (i.e., no defect, small defect, large defect, and small heart) so that factors affecting variation could be analyzed. RESULTS: In mathematic models > or = 74 mL, volume error was within +/-15%, whereas for a small volume (34 mL), QGS and 4D-MSPECT underestimated the volume and pFAST overestimated it. The respective intra- and interobserver reproducibility of the results was good for QGS (r = 0.99 and 1.00), ECT (r = 0.98 and 0.98), and 4D-MSPECT (r = 0.98 and 0.98) and fair for pFAST (r = 0.88 and 0.85). The correlation coefficient for EF between gated SPECT and the GBP study was 0.82, 0.78, 0.69, and 0.84 for QGS, ECT, 4D-MSPECT, and pFAST, respectively. The correlation coefficient for EDV between gated SPECT and the GBP study was 0.88, 0.89, 0.85, and 0.90, respectively. Although good correlation was observed among the 4 software packages, QGS, ECT, and 4D-MSPECT overestimated EF in patients with small hearts, and pFAST overestimated the true volume in patients with large perfusion defects. Correlation coefficients among the 4 kinds of software were 0.80-0.95 for EF and 0.89-0.98 for EDV. CONCLUSION: All 4 software programs showed good correlation between EF or EDV and the GBP study. Good correlation was observed also between each pair of quantification methods. However, because each method has unique characteristics that depend on its specific algorithm and thus behaves differently in the various patient subgroups, the methods should not be used interchangeably.     

Factors affecting left ventricular ejection fraction using automated quantitative gated SPECT

BACKGROUND: Factors affecting the accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) quantification using automated quantitative gated SPECT have not been adequately investigated in patients in the clinical setting. Therefore, the authors studied the effect of defect size and Tc-99m tetrofosmin dose on the accuracy of LVEF calculation using the automated QGS program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients underwent gated rest and stress myocardial perfusion SPECT after administration of 8 and 27 mCi Tc-99m tetrofosmin, respectively. The LVEF was obtained for both the rest and stress studies using the QGS program and compared with the LVEF obtained using quantitative echocardiography performed within 2 weeks. Myocardial perfusion defects were recorded as scarring, ischemia, or mixed scarring and ischemia in 12 left ventricular segments. The defect size was evaluated by adding the number of affected segments. RESULTS: The mean LVEF calculated using high-dose stress QGS, low-dose rest QGS, and echocardiography was 49.2% +/- 15%, 46.2% +/- 17% and 48.7% +/- 16.9% respectively, with no statistically significant differences. The LVEF obtained using high-dose stress QGS correlated better with echocardiography than did that obtained using low-dose rest QGS (r = 0.86 versus 0.76). In addition, when the high-dose stress LVEF in the 14 patients with normal myocardial perfusion was compared with that in 11 patients who had one- or two-segment perfusion defects, and 7 patients who had perfusion defects in > or = three segments, there was good correlation with echocardiography in the three patient groups (r = 0.85, 0.88, and 0.91, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial perfusion defects do not affect the accuracy of LVEF calculation using automated QGS. High-dose gated myocardial SPECT demonstrated better correlation with quantitative echocardiography LVEF results.     

Clinical impact of arrhythmias on gated SPECT cardiac myocardial perfusion and function assessment

BACKGROUND. We reported previously that mean quantified cardiac functional parameters computed by one gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) technique were not significantly altered by common gating errors. However, it is not known to what extent other gated SPECT approaches that are based on different ventricular modeling assumptions are influenced by arrhythmias, nor are the effects of gating errors on visual analyses and their subsequent clinical implications known. METHODS. Projection data for 50 patients (aged 64 +/- 12 years; 68% men; 76% with myocardial perfusion defects) undergoing technetium-99m sestamibi gated SPECT who were in sinus rhythm during data acquisition were altered to simulate common arrhythmias. To determine quantitative effects, we performed calculations for original control and altered images by Gaussian myocardial detection (Quantitative Gated SPECT [QGS] program) and by wall thickening derived from gated perfusion polar maps (Emory Cardiac Toolbox program). To evaluate visual assessment in control and simulated-arrhythmia tomograms, 2 experienced blinded observers independently interpreted perfusion from polar maps and wall motion and thickening from tomographic cines, using a 4-point scale. RESULTS. Although mean functional parameters were scarcely altered, paired t tests showed ejection fraction fluctuations to be significantly different from control values, causing patients to change between abnormal and normal ejection fraction categories (2% of patients by QGS and 14% by Emory Cardiac Toolbox). Visual examination of QGS polar perfusion and function maps showed changes for 72% of cases, although in only 4% were these considered to have potential clinical consequences. The kappa statistic for visual analysis of concordance between control and arrhythmia readings showed that agreement was "excellent" for perfusion, "good" for motion, and "marginal" for thickening. CONCLUSIONS. As with quantitative measurements, thickening is the parameter most prone to error in the presence of arrhythmias. It is important to test data for gating errors to avoid potentially erroneous measurements and visual readings.     

Heterogeneity of myocardial wall motion and thickening in the left ventricle evaluated with quantitative gated SPECT

BACKGROUND: Global and regional ventricular function may be evaluated by using gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). This study investigated two parameters of regional contraction of the left ventricle, segmental wall motion (WM) and wall thickening (WT), to determine their similarity and disparity in each myocardial segment in patients with normal myocardial perfusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with normal myocardial perfusion and cardiac function (mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 62.6%+/-8.8%) were included in this study. A 1-day stress/rest protocol was used as a means of acquiring technetium 99m (Tc-99m) sestamibi gated SPECT protocol for each patient. A commercially available software package for quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) was used to generate cine loop three-dimensional surface display and SPECT images. The left ventricle was divided into 9 segments to score WM and WT (on a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 being normal and 4 being severely reduced) by 6 independent observers. The WM score was significantly higher than the WT score in the septum, whereas the WM score was lower than the WT score in the inferior segment. Similar WM and WT scores were observed in the remaining segments. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneous myocardial WM and WT were observed by using QGS software. These findings suggest that different criteria are required in each segment to evaluate segmental WM and WT by means of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.