Chirurgische Therapie von Weichteilsarkomen der Extremitäten

Background

Surgery with curative intention in multimodal treatment concepts for patients with soft tissue sarcomas is the most important prognostic factor. Clear resection margins (R0) are one of the most important prognostic factors especially in the prevention of local recurrence and probably also in the overall survival of the disease. If R0 resection seems to be possible or can only be realized with mutilating procedures, neoadjuvant therapy concepts must be considered.

Objective

The principles of surgical therapy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas including multimodal strategies are discussed.

Material and methods

A systematic literature review of original articles and review articles over the last 15 years was performed. No prospective, randomized studies on surgery of soft tissue sarcomas were identified. The publications are discussed and assessed.

Results

In recent decades it could be shown that a compartmental resection has no significant advantages over wide resection with respect to local recurrence rate and overall survival. In the literature the rate of local recurrence is cited as being between 10?% and 40?% and the 5-year overall survival for all patients is approximately 50?%. In wide resections the ideal safety margin is not clearly defined. An R0 resection is therefore the most important criterion. A safety margin of at least 1 cm in all directions, as has been recommended for many years, can no longer be justified, the only exception being for liposarcoma (G1), the atypical lipoma of the extremities. Systemic chemotherapy (with or without hyperthermia) or radiotherapy can be beneficial and necessary in a multimodal neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. With neoadjuvant radiotherapy a significantly increased rate of wound healing problems (>?30?%) in patients must be considered. Isolated hyperthermic limb perfusion (ILP) together with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and melphalan is an effective treatment option for patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities if an R0 resection could only be achieved by functional or anatomical amputations. Using this procedure allows resection of the soft tissue sarcoma and limb salvage in 81?% of patients. Reconstructive operative methods including flap surgery, vessel reconstruction and mesh grafts can be performed in approximately 20?% of patients.

Conclusions

A planned multidisciplinary concept from primary imaging, radiology, biopsy to histopathological investigation is necessary for defining the multimodal therapy and follow-up of patients with a soft tissue sarcoma. Surgery is still the key factor for local control and overall survival. The standard of care for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities, with the exception of atypical lipoma, is a wide resection (R0). An ultraradical resection including vital structures for extending an already foreseeable free margin (R0) does not show any benefits. If a resection or re-resection cannot be performed in sano (i.e. R1), additional adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiotherapy should be included. The ILP procedure including TNF-alpha and melphalan is an effective treatment option in selected cases for patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities to avoid functional or anatomical amputations.     

TNF-based isolated limb perfusion in unresectable extremity desmoid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Desmoid tumours are soft tissue sarcomas with local aggressive behaviour and a high rate of local recurrence after treatment. Although they do not tend to metastasise systemically, the local aggressiveness can lead to situations in which limb-preserving surgery cannot be performed without severe disability. As isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with TNF and melphalan has proven to be extremely effective in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma, we studied its potential in locally advanced extremity desmoid tumours. METHODS: Prospectively maintained database in a tertiary referral centre. Between 1991 and 2003, 12 ILP procedures were performed in 11 patients for locally advanced desmoid tumours. Local surgical therapy with preservation of limb function was impossible in all patients due to large or multifocal tumours, multiple recurrences or extensive previous treatment. Perfusions were performed with 4-3mg TNF and 10-13 mg/l limb volume melphalan form leg and arm perfusions, respectively. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 75%: Two complete responses were recorded (17%) and seven patients had a partial response (58%). Amputation could be avoided in all cases. Local control was obtained after 10/12 ILPs and in the other two patients through repeat ILP and systemic chemotherapy, thus leading to an overall local control rate of 100%. Local toxicity was mild and systemic toxicity was absent in all patients. CONCLUSION: ILP is a very effective treatment option in the multimodality treatment of limb desmoid tumours. It should be considered in patients with aggressive and disabling disease where resection without important functional sacrifice is impossible.     

Isolated limb perfusion with tumour necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan for unresectable bone sarcomas of the lower extremity.

AIMS: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with recombinant tumour necrosis factor-alpha (rTNF-alpha) and melphalan has recently been reported to induce major tumour responses and permit limb salvage in over 80% of patients with unresectable soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. We investigated whether TNF-based ILP could allow limb-sparing surgery in patients with primary, recurrent or metastatic bone sarcoma to the lower extremity who met the criteria for an amputation and had failed or refused chemotherapy. METHODS: From August 1992 to December 1997, we employed ILP with rTNF-alpha and melphalan in 13 patients with unresectable bone sarcoma of the lower extremity, all of whom were candidates for amputation. The aim was to reduce tumour size and allow the performance of a limb-sparing surgery (LSS). RESULTS: Following ILP, none of the patients had severe local toxicity and only one patient experienced significant systemic side-effects. LSS was subsequently performed in nine of the 13 patients. LSS was feasible in an additional three patients but was not performed because of the emergence of diffused metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: ILP with rTNF-alpha and melphalan can allow limb salvage in patients wih locally advanced bone sarcomas who had failed standard treatment options. Its potential role in the treatment of unresectable bone sarcomas of the extremities merits further evaluation.     

Oncological outcome after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion for primarily unresectable versus locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of extremities

IntroductionThe management of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas, particularly in terms of a limb salvage strategy, represents a challenge, especially in recurrent tumors. In the context of a patient-tailored multimodal therapy, hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a promising limb-saving treatment option. We report the outcome of patients with primarily irresectable and locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated by ILP.Patients and methodsData about patient demographics, clinical und histopathological characteristics, tumor response, morbidity and oncological outcome of all patients with STS, who underwent an ILP at our institution in a 10-year period, were retrospectively detected and analyzed.ResultsThe cohort comprised 30 patients. Two patients were treated with ILP for palliative tumor control, 13 patients because of a local recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (rSTS) and 15 patients because of primarily unresectable soft tissue sarcoma (puSTS). 25 of the 28 patients with curative intention received surgery after ILP (11 pts with rSTS and 14 pts with puSTS). Histopathologically we observed complete response in 6 patients (24%) and partial responses in 19 patients (76%) with a significant better remission in patients with puSTS (p = 0,043). Limb salvage rate was 75%. Mean follow-up was 69 months [range 13–142 months]. Seven (7/11; 64%) patients with rSTS and one (1/14; 7%) patient with puSTS developed local recurrence after ILP and surgery, whereas eight (8/13; 62%) rSTS patients and seven (7/15; 47%) puSTS patients developed distant metastasis. During follow-up, eight patients (28.5%) died of disease (5/13; 38%) rSTS and 3/15 (20%) puSTS. ILP in the group of previously irradiated sarcoma patients (n = 13) resulted in a limb salvage rate of 69% and was not associated in an increased risk for adverse events.DiscussionILP for advanced extremity STS is a treatment option for both puSTS and rSTS resulting in good local control and should be considered in multimodal management. ILP is also a good option for patients after radiation history.     

Isolated Limb Perfusion with Melphalan and TNF-α in the Treatment of Extremity Sarcoma

Opinion statement Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with chemotherapy alone has uniformly failed in the treatment of irresectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas. The addition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) to this treatment approach contributed to a major step forward in the treatment of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). High response rates and limb salvage rates have been reported in multicenter trials, which combined ILP with TNF-α plus melphalan, which resulted in the approval of TNF-α for this indication in Europe in 1998. Subsequently a series of confirmatory single institution reports on the efficacy of the procedure have now been published. TNF-α has an early and a late effect; it enhances tumor-selective drug uptake during the perfusion and plays an essential role in the subsequent selective destruction of the tumor vasculature. These effects result in a high response rate in high-grade soft tissue sarcomas. This induction therapy thus allows for resection of tumor remnants some 3 months after ILP and thus avoidance of limb amputation. TNF-α-based ILP is a well-established treatment to avoid amputations. It represents an important example of tumor vasculatory-modulating combination therapy and should be offered in large volume tertiary referral centers.     

Limb preservation and tumor control in the treatment of popliteal and antecubital soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas of the antecubital and popliteal space often involve the neurovascular bundle and are prone to recurrence after surgical resection. Amputation has frequently been performed for control of these tumors. A multimodality treatment program consisting of limb-sparing resection, tumor-bed radiation using temporary iridium 192 implants, and adjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade lesions, has yielded satisfactory preservation of limb function and no local tumor recurrence in ten patients after a median follow-up time of 5 years. Eight of the ten patients are still alive, five of whom beyond 5 years; six of the eight survivors had high-grade tumors. These results are superior to those of 14 patients with similar tumors treated earlier by surgery alone: seven by amputation and seven by soft part resection; four of the latter resulted in local recurrence and all of the seven who had high-grade sarcoma died of disease. Multimodality treatment including limb-sparing resection merits consideration in the management of antecubital and popliteal soft tissue sarcomas.     

The oncological outcomes of isolated limb perfusion and neo-adjuvant radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma patients - A nationwide multicenter study

IntroductionPatients with locally extensive high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas (eSTS) are often presented in multidisciplinary teams to decide between ablative surgery (amputation) or limb-salvage surgery supplemented with either neo-adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or induction isolated limb perfusion (ILP).In The Netherlands, ILP typically aims to reduce the size of tumors that would otherwise be considered irresectable, whereas neo-adjuvant RT aims mainly at improving local control and reducing morbidity of required marginal margins.This study presents a 15-year nationwide cohort to describe the oncological outcomes of both pre-operative treatment strategies.MethodsAll consecutive patients with locally extensive primary high-grade eSTS surgically treated between 2000 and 2015 at five tertiary sarcoma centers that received neo-adjuvant ILP or RT were included. 169 patients met the inclusion criteria (89 ILP, 80 RT). Median follow-up was 7.3 years.ResultsLimb salvage was achieved in 84% of cases in the ILP group (80% for patients with amputation indication) and 96% of cases in the RT group. 5-Year overall survival was 47% in the ILP group, 69% in the RT group. 5-Year local recurrence rate was 14% in the ILP group, 10% in the RT group. Distant metastasis rate was 55% in the ILP group, 36% in the RT group.ConclusionWe find oncological outcomes and limb salvage rates in line with existing literature for both treatment modalities. Whether the tumor was locally advanced with an indication for induction therapy to prevent amputation or morbid surgery appeared to be the main determinant in choosing between neo-adjuvant ILP or RT.     

Role of isolated limb perfusion with recombinant human tumor necrosis factor α and melphalan in locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma

The management of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma of the limbs is challenging, particularly for recurrent tumors and those adjacent to neurovascular bundles and joints. Typically, the tumors are large, below the fascia, and high‐grade (T2b or stage III according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer) and thus require multimodal therapy. Treatment options must be tailored to patient and tumor characteristics. Isolated limb perfusion with recombinant human tumor necrosis factor α and melphalan (TNF‐ILP) adds a therapeutic option to radiation therapy (RT) and systemic chemotherapy. Although the procedure is somewhat sophisticated to learn, it is a safe method and has been used now for almost 2 decades at more than 50 centers worldwide. TNF‐ILP yields a high rate of complete or nearly complete pathologic tumor remission. In combination with surgical resection of the tumor remnant after isolated limb perfusion, the limb salvage rate is close to 90%. Often, patients can be spared adjuvant RT without long‐term local tumor control rates being compromised. Nevertheless, TNF‐ILP has never been compared with another treatment regimen in a randomized trial. This review summarizes the mode of action and standard application of TNF‐ILP and focuses on a critical discussion of the role of TNF‐ILP in the multimodal treatment of locally advanced primary and recurrent extremity sarcoma. Cancer 2016 . © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2624–2632. © 2016 American Cancer Society.     

Surgical considerations for management of distal extremity soft tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on the surgical management of soft tissue sarcomas of the hands and the feet. With recent advances in limb salvage surgery and radiotherapy delivery, local control of soft tissue sarcoma in the extremity has become optimized, and the associated functional results of this treatment have taken on extreme importance. Techniques to limit the amount of normal tissue resected and to reconstruct the resulting defects are critical to the final functional result. RECENT FINDINGS: Several features of soft tissue sarcoma unique to the hand and foot have been reported. Certain histologic subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma have been noted to arise preferentially in the hand and the foot, such as epithelioid sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma. Patients with hand and foot sarcomas have been described as having improved overall survival, but this is likely a result of the smaller size of tumors arising in these locations. Reconstruction of bone defects using various techniques, vascular reconstruction, tendon transfers, and soft tissue reconstruction using regional flaps in the hand and free flaps in the foot have resulted in good functional outcomes. Amputation and early prosthetic fitting still have a role in management of some soft tissue sarcomas, most frequently in the foot. SUMMARY: Limb salvage remains the standard of care for extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Given the fact that patients have good oncologic and functional outcomes with limb salvage in tumors in the hand and foot, surgical oncologists should have this goal for each patient.     

Isolated limb perfusion in the management of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma

In conclusion, ILP is an interesting and important treatment option in the management of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Large medical centers, dealing with referrals and an important caseload of STS patients, should develop this treatment option and have it readily available to offer patients the best chances for limb salvage. In Europe, the success of TNF-based ILP has lead to the training, accreditation, and activation of TNF-based ILP programs in over 30 cancer centers since the approval of TNF for this indication in 1999. Thus, country by country centers for referral programs are established to deal with those categories of patients that can greatly benefit from the availability and integration of this treatment option in the STS treatment programs.     

Functional and clinical outcomes of limb-sparing therapy for pediatric extremity sarcomas

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical and functional outcomes of children undergoing limb-sparing therapy for extremity sarcomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients, age < or = 21 years, who were treated between l979 and l998 with external beam radiotherapy as a component of limb-sparing therapy for primary sarcomas of the extremity at UCSF. Included were patients for whom complete follow-up and functional outcome assessments were available. We assessed the patterns of failure, overall survival, disease-free survival, local control, and limb function. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 3 years, 12 of the 30 patients recurred: 3 locally, 8 distantly, and 1 with synchronous local and distant disease as site of first progression. Eighteen patients were alive with no evidence of disease. The median overall survival was 10 years, with a median disease-free survival of 8 years. Functional outcome assessment revealed 15 patients retained excellent, 12 good, 1 fair, and 2 poor limb function. CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients receiving limb-sparing therapy, 90% maintained excellent or good limb function without compromising survival, demonstrating the validity of limb preservation in children with extremity sarcomas.     

Soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity: a 5-year experience at two institutions emphasizing the role of soft tissue flap reconstruction

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to define the impact of soft tissue flap reconstruction on multimodality therapy for patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity. Treatment standards continue to evolve for these patients, and, with multimodality therapy, most of them are candidates for limb-preserving surgery. Consequently, the role of soft tissue flap reconstruction is expanding. METHODS: A review was conducted of 100 consecutive patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity who underwent surgery at several institutions between 1992 and 1997. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients underwent direct closure of defects after tumor resection, and 29 patients required soft tissue reconstruction with flaps. These groups were similar in most respects, except that 52% of the patients who required soft tissue reconstruction presented with recurrent disease (P = 0.0004), and 79% of them had tumors measuring > 5 cm in greatest dimension (P = 0.0003). The patients who required flap reconstruction had larger skin deficits after undergoing tumor resection (140 cm2) compared with the patients who had wounds that were managed by direct closure (40 cm2; P < 0.00001). Margins around the resected tumors were larger (1.62 cm) when flaps were employed compared with margins when defects were closed directly (0.87 cm; P = 0.0005). However, the number of patients with intralesional, marginal, wide, and radical resections was the same regardless of wound management. Major complications occurred in 14% of patients, but none led to death or amputation. The median follow-up was 31 months, and 66% of patients had no evidence of disease at that time. Rates of local recurrence and survival were similar for patients who underwent flap reconstruction compared with patients who underwent direct closure. CONCLUSIONS: Soft tissue flap reconstruction facilitates therapy for patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity, so that patients with larger tumors can undergo resection, limiting complications and limb sacrifice.     

软组织肉瘤治疗现状

软组织肉瘤是一类主要起源于胚胎中胚层的恶性肿瘤，全球每年发病率在1．8～5．0／10万，约占成人恶性肿瘤的1％，占儿童恶性肿瘤的7％～10％[1]。该肿瘤可以发生在任何部位，以四肢最为多见（上下肢包括肢带骨占近60％）[2]。可以发生在任何年龄，但发病率会随着年龄的增长而升高，美国一项基于疾病登记机构的17364例患者研究显示，患者平均诊断年龄为57．4岁。     

The palliative value of tumor necrosis factor alpha-based isolated limb perfusion in patients with metastatic sarcoma and melanoma

BACKGROUND: Both patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and patients with melanoma have limited treatment possibilities once the tumor has metastasized systemically. In patients with extremity STS or bulky melanoma in-transit metastases, the local tumor burden may be so problematic that, even in patients with systemically metastasized disease, an amputation may be inevitable. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) has proven to be an excellent, local, limb-saving treatment option in patients with locally advanced extremity tumors. In this study, the authors investigated the palliative value of the ILP procedure to avoid amputation in patients who had Stage IV STS and melanoma. METHODS: From 1991 to 2003, of 339 tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF)-based ILPs, 51 procedures were performed for either Stage IV STS (n = 37 patients) or Stage IV melanoma (n = 14 patients). All patients underwent an ILP with TNF and melphalan of the upper limb (n = 4 patients) or the lower limb (n = 47 patients) with 26-140 mg melphalan and 2-4 mg TNF. RESULTS: The overall response in patients with Stage IV STS was 84%, and their median survival was 12 months after ILP. Limb salvage was achieved in 36 of 37 patients, with 1 patient undergoing amputation due to treatment toxicity. In the patients with Stage IV melanoma, the complete response rate was 43%. All patients with melanoma preserved their limb during a median survival of 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: TNF-based ILP is an excellent procedure that provided tumor control and limb salvage for the short survival of patients with metastasized, very bulky, limb-threatening tumors of the extremity.     

Clinical outcomes of intraoperative radiation therapy for extremity sarcomas

Purpose. Radiation of extremity lesions, a key component of limb-sparing therapy, presents particular challenges, with significant risks of toxicities. We sought to explore the efficacy of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Patients. Between 1995 and 2001, 17 patients received IORT for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Indications for IORT included recurrent tumors in a previously radiated field or tumors adjacent to critical structures. Results. Gross total resections were achieved in all 17 patients. Two patients experienced locoregional relapses, six patients recurred at metastatic sites, and one patient died without recurrence. Thirty-six month estimates for locoregional control, disease free survival, and overall survival were 86%, 50%, and 78%, respectively. IORT was extremely well tolerated, with no toxicities referable to IORT. Conclusions. For patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities, IORT used as a boost to EBRT provides excellent local control, with limited acute toxicities.     

Technology insight: Utility of TNF-alpha-based isolated limb perfusion to avoid amputation of irresectable tumors of the extremities

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan is effective in the treatment of small multiple melanoma intransit metastases and is utilized widely for this indication. The treatment is much less effective against bulky melanoma metastases and has uniformly failed in the treatment of irresectable extremity soft tissue sarcomas. The addition of tumor-necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) to this treatment approach has changed the situation dramatically. High response rates and limb-salvage rates have been reported in multicenter trials that combined ILP with TNF-alpha plus melphalan; these trials resulted in the approval of TNF-alpha for bulky melanoma metastases and soft tissue sarcomas in Europe in 1998. Subsequently, many doctors working in European centers have been trained, and a series of confirmatory reports from single institutions have now been published regarding the efficacy of the procedure. TNF-alpha has an early and a late effect; it enhances tumor-selective drug uptake during the perfusion, and plays an essential role in the subsequent selective destruction of the tumor vasculature. These effects result in a high response rate in bulky tumors, soft tissue sarcomas, bulky melanomas, and various other tumor types. This induction therapy therefore allows tumor remnants to be resected some 3 months after ILP thus avoiding limb amputation. TNF-alpha-based ILP is a well-established treatment that aims to avoid amputations regardless of the tumor size and type. It represents an important example of combination therapy that modulates the tumor vasculature and should be offered in high-volume tertiary referral centers.     

Limb salvage by neoadjuvant isolated perfusion with TNFalpha and melphalan for non-resectable soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.

AIMS: Patients with non-resectable soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities do not live longer if they are treated by amputation or disarticulation. In order to avoid major amputations, we tested isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF)+melphalan+/-interferon-gamma (IFN) as a pre-operative, neoadjuvant limb salvage treatment. METHODS: Twenty-two patients were included (six men and 16 women; three upper limb and 19 lower limb tumours). The AJCC stage was IIA in four patients, III in seven and IV in 11. Thirteen cases were recurrent or progressive after previous therapy; five tumours had a diameter >/=20 cm, and four were multiple or regionally metastatic. There were six malignant fibrous histiocytomas, five liposarcomas, four malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, three rhabdomyosarcomas, two leiomyosarcomas, one recurrent extraskeletal osteosarcoma and one angiosarcoma. RESULTS: Twenty-four ILPs were performed in the 22 patients, and 18 (82%) experienced an objective response: this was complete in four (18%) and partial in 14 (64%). Three patients had a minimal or no response and the tumour progressed in one case. All patients had fever for 24 hours but only one developed a reversible grade 3 distributive shock syndrome with no sequelae. There was no grade 4 toxicity. Seventeen patients (77%) underwent limb-sparing resection of the tumour remnants after a median time of 3.4 months: 10 resections were intracompartmental and seven extracompartmental. Surgery included flaps or skin grafts in five patients, arterial replacement in two and knee arthrodesis in one. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to eight patients and radiotherapy to six. In one patient amputation was necessary after a second ILP. Secondary amputations were performed for recurrence in two patients, resulting in an overall limb salvage rate of 19/22 (86%). After a median follow-up of 18.7 months, 10 recurrences were recorded: seven were both local and systemic and three were only local. The median disease free and overall survival times have been >12.5 and 18.7 months respectively: this is similar to the outcome after primary amputations for similar cases. CONCLUSION: ILP with TNF and chemotherapy is an efficient limb sparing neoadjuvant therapy for a priori non-resectable limb soft tissue sarcomas.     

Möglichkeiten der plastischen Chirurgie in der Behandlung von Weichteilsarkomen

Background

The therapy of choice for locally limited soft tissue sarcomas involves complete surgical resection of the tumor. The goal of surgical therapy is the achievement of negative surgical margins (R0 resection). In locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas that have already infiltrated critical anatomical structures, the achievement of R0 status can be associated with a high surgical morbidity and result in functional impairment of the affected extremities or truncal wall. Plastic surgery can reduce this surgical morbidity by using a variety of modern techniques.

Objective

The aim of this article is to illustrate the various treatment options of plastic surgery in the multimodal therapy of patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Material and methods

This article is based on a review of the current literature and evaluation of an in-house patient database.

Results

Several plastic surgery treatment options can be implemented in the curative and palliative therapy of patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and truncal wall. Large soft tissue defects can be covered by local pedicled or free flaps, whereas bone defects can be reconstructed by free bone transfer. Motor reconstruction surgery can partially restore functional impairment of extremities after nerve or muscle resection. In palliative disease stages soft tissue coverage after surgical debulking of exulcerated tumors can improve the quality of life of affected patients.

Discussion

Reconstructive plastic surgery techniques can restore functional impairments and cover soft tissue defects so that amputation of extremities can be avoided or complete tumor resection from the truncal wall can be made possible. In palliative disease situations plastic surgery can improve the quality of life.     

Retroperitoneal sarcomas: combined modality treatment approaches

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors estimated to account for 15%of all patients with soft tissue sarcoma seen in referral populations. The standard of care for patients with localized, resectable retroperitoneal sarcomas is surgical resection with gross and microscopically negative margins. However, owing to the large size and locally advanced nature of these tumors, this goal is difficult to achieve in most patients. As a result, the disease is characterized by a high propensity for local recurrence and a grade-specific risk for distant metastasis.Over the past decade, there has been considerable research into combined modality treatment of these tumors. The present report outlines current concepts relating to the diagnosis, staging, and management of retroperitoneal sarcomas. Emphasis is placed on evolving combined modality treatment approaches and current investigational strategies.     

Isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan for patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities

BACKGROUND: Since 1992, isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) and melphalan has been used for the treatment of patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The authors retrospectively studied the results of limb salvage surgery using TNFalpha-ILP at their institution. METHODS: From 1992 to 2001, 49 patients (mean age, 51 years; range, 14-85 years) underwent ILP for unresectable soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. All patients received melphalan and TNFalpha (four patients also received interferon-gamma). The median follow-up was 26 months (range, from 2 days to 103 months). RESULTS: In 1 patient (2%) who died 2 days after undergoing ILP, response and acute limb toxicity could not be assessed. One patient (2%) attained a clinical complete response (2%), 23 patients (47%) attained a clinical partial response, 17 patients (35%) demonstrated no change, and 7 patients (14%) had tumor progression. Thirty-one patients (63%) underwent tumor resection. Histologic material also was available from eight amputations and three punctures/biopsies. Pathologic response was complete in 4 patients (8%), partial in 14 patients (29%), and no change was observed in 24 patients (49%). Final response, based on both clinical and pathologic assessment in which pathology was decisive, was complete in 4 patients (8%) and partial in 27 patients (55%), resulting in a final overall response rate of 63%. Local control with preservation of the limb was attained in 28 patients (57%). Four of 32 patients (13%) who had been rendered tumor free by ILP with or without undergoing resection and radiation therapy, developed a local recurrence. The 5-year disease specific survival rate was 48% for the 49 patients. Acute limb toxicity after ILP was a mild Grade 1-2 reaction in 35 patients (71%) patients, a Grade 3 reaction in 12 patients (25%), and a Grade 4 reaction in 1 patient (2%). Three major ILP-related complications were encountered, including arterial thrombosis in two patients and a fulminant Clostridial infection leading to death in one patient. There were no severe cardiovascular reactions after ILP. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unresectable soft tissue sarcomas of the limbs who underwent ILP with TNFalpha and melphalan followed by resection of the tumor remnant when possible, a 63% overall tumor response rate and a 57% local control rate with limb preservation was achieved.