Antagonism of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine at two training doses by dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists

RATIONALE: The relative contributions of different dopamine receptor subtypes to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine may be influenced by the training dose of cocaine. Substitution tests with dopamine receptor agonists have suggested that the role of dopamine D2-like receptors is diminished relative to that of D1-like receptors at a training dose of 3 mg/kg cocaine compared with a training dose of 10 mg/kg. OBJECTIVES: To test whether dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists were differentially effective at attenuating cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects at different training doses, and to test for the first time an antagonist that is selective for the dopamine D2 receptor within the D2-like receptor subfamily. METHODS: Rats were trained to press one lever after receiving cocaine and another after receiving saline (maintaining >95% drug-appropriate responding). Three dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists (haloperidol, raclopride and L-741,626) were tested in rats trained at 3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg cocaine. At the lower training dose, the D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 39166 was also tested. RESULTS: The antagonists were not differentially effective between training groups: they all produced parallel, rightward shifts in cocaine's dose-effect function, indicating surmountable antagonism. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that D2-like receptor antagonists with different affinities for the various D2-like receptors can antagonise the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine at two training doses. Importantly, antagonism by L-741,626 implies that stimulation of D2 receptors alone (not D3 or D4 receptors) is sufficient to mediate cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects. Finally, the claim that D1-like receptors are preferentially involved at low training doses of cocaine is only consistent with the current findings if indirect stimulation of D2 receptors by low doses of cocaine remains necessary for the expression of the D1-like receptor-mediated effect.     

Modulation of cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects by dopamine D(1) agonists in rhesus monkeys

Dopamine (DA) D(1) agonists are classified as high- or low-efficacy on the basis of in vitro functional measures as compared to DA. In monkeys self-administering cocaine, high-efficacy D(1) agonists have been shown to have reinforcing effects, while low-efficacy agonists do not. However, the relationship between D(1) agonist efficacy and cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects, particularly in rhesus monkeys, is not clear. The present study investigated the discriminative stimulus effects of a high- (SKF 81297) and a low-efficacy (SKF 38393) D(1) agonist in rhesus monkeys (n=4) trained to discriminate cocaine from saline using a two-lever drug discrimination procedure. In a second experiment, the effects of agonist pretreatments, as well as pretreatment with a D(1) antagonist, on cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects were evaluated. SKF 81297 (0.01-1.7 mg/kg) fully substituted for cocaine in three of four animals (> 80% cocaine-appropriate responding), while SKF 38393 (0.3-10 mg/kg) occasioned < 50% cocaine-appropriate responding in all subjects. When given as a pretreatment, neither agonist altered cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects at the doses tested. In contrast, the D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 attenuated cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects. These results indicate that D(1) agonists have cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects in rhesus monkeys that are consistent with their in vitro efficacies. However, when given in combination with cocaine, D(1) agonist efficacy does not appear to be a major factor in modifying cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects.     

Discriminative and reinforcing stimulus effects of nicotine, cocaine, and cocaine + nicotine combinations in rhesus monkeys

Concurrent cigarette smoking and cocaine use is well documented. However, the behavioral pharmacology of cocaine and nicotine combinations is poorly understood, and there is a need for animal models to examine this form of polydrug abuse. The purpose of this study was twofold: first to assess the effects of nicotine on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, and second, to study self-administration of nicotine/cocaine combinations in a novel polydrug abuse model. In drug discrimination experiments, nicotine increased the discriminative stimulus effects of low cocaine doses in two of three monkeys, but nicotine did not substitute for cocaine in any monkey. Self-administration of cocaine and nicotine alone, and cocaine + nicotine combinations was studied under a second-order fixed ratio 2, variable ratio 16 (FR2[VR16:S]) schedule of reinforcement. Cocaine and nicotine alone were self-administered in a dose-dependent manner. The combination of marginally reinforcing doses of cocaine and nicotine increased drug self-administration behavior above levels observed with the same dose of either cocaine or nicotine alone. These findings indicate that nicotine may increase cocaine's discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects in rhesus monkeys, and illustrate the feasibility of combining cocaine and nicotine in a preclinical model of polydrug abuse. Further studies of the behavioral effects of nicotine + cocaine combinations will contribute to our understanding the pharmacology of dual nicotine and cocaine dependence, and will be useful for evaluation of new treatment medications.     

Effects of pregnanolone in rats discriminating cocaine

The discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine are typically attributed to its ability to increase dopaminergic transmission, although drugs that have different mechanisms of action can substitute for cocaine and modulation of the GABA(A) receptor system has been reported to alter its discriminative effects. Therefore, a discrimination procedure was used to extend the characterization of cocaine's discriminative effects and to examine the interaction between cocaine and pregnanolone, a drug that can modulate the GABA(A) receptor complex. Rats (n=15) were trained to discriminate saline from 5.6 or 10 mg/kg of cocaine under a fixed-ratio (FR) 20 schedule of food presentation. The dopamine releaser d-amphetamine and two monoamine uptake inhibitors bupropion and desipramine substituted for cocaine. In contrast, the positive GABA(A) modulators pregnanolone and lorazepam and the opioid agonist morphine did not substitute for cocaine. When administered prior to cocaine, the D(2) receptor antagonist haloperidol and pregnanolone, but not lorazepam, produced a small rightward shift of the cocaine dose-effect curve. The results of the present studies suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine are not solely mediated by increases in dopaminergic transmission and that positive modulation of GABA(A) receptors by pregnanolone can alter these effects, albeit at doses that also decrease overall response rate.     

Interaction of lobeline and nicotinic receptor ligands with the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine and amphetamine

Lobeline has high affinity for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and inhibits the function of vesicular and plasmalemmal monoamine transporters. Moreover, lobeline has been shown to alter the neurochemical and behavioral effects of psychostimulants. The present study determined the effect of lobeline and drugs selective for nicotinic receptors on the discriminative stimulus properties of low doses of cocaine (1.6 or 5.0 mg/kg) or d-amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg) in rats, using a standard two-lever drug discrimination procedure with food reinforcement. Nicotine substituted for both amphetamine and cocaine. The nicotinic receptor antagonists mecamylamine and hexamethonium did not substitute for or block the cocaine or amphetamine stimulus. In contrast, lobeline substituted for cocaine, but did not substitute for amphetamine. In antagonism tests, lobeline doses that did not substitute for cocaine decreased responding on the cocaine-paired levers. Surprisingly, lobeline did not alter the discriminative stimulus properties of amphetamine. This research further supports the supposition that nicotine, cocaine and amphetamine produce similar, but distinct subjective states. Furthermore, the present findings suggest that lobeline has a complex mechanism of action to disrupt the behavioral effects of drugs of abuse.     

Effect of sigma ligands on the cocaine-induced convulsions in mice

It has been hypothesized that some of negative effects exerted by cocaine are mediated via sigma (sigma) receptors. This report demonstrates the effects of selective sigma ligands, panamesine, DTG, rimcazole and SA 4503, on the cocaine-induced convulsions in mice and locomotor hyperactivity in rats. Only panamesine decreased both these effects of cocaine, whereas DTG and rimcazole increased the total time of cocaine-evoked convulsions and locomotor activity. SA 4503 slightly enhanced and prolonged cocaine-induced convulsions but it was ineffective in locomotor hyperactivity test. Moreover, the increase in cocaine-induced locomotor hyperactivity evoked by DTG was antagonized by panamesine. The obtained results indicate that panamesine, a selective sigma ligand with a preference for sigma1 receptor subtype and potential antagonistic activity, decreased the effects of cocaine. DTG and rimcazole (potential sigma1/sigma2 sites agonists) as well as SA 4503 (potential sigma1 site agonist) showed rather opposite effects. These findings support the idea that sigma2 receptor subtype is involved in psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine while sigma1 receptor subtype participates in the cocaine-induced convulsions. In addition, sigma receptor antagonists (especially sigma1 ones) are able to antagonize toxic effects of cocaine while sigma agonists facilitate them.     

Effects of the selective sigma receptor ligand, 1-(2-phenethyl)piperidine oxalate (AC927), on the behavioral and toxic effects of cocaine

Background

Sigma receptors represent a unique structural class of proteins and they have become increasingly studied as viable medication development targets for neurological and psychiatric disorders, including drug abuse. Earlier studies have shown that cocaine and many other abused substances interact with sigma receptors and that antagonism of these proteins can mitigate their actions.

Methods

In the present study, AC927 (1-(2-phenethyl)piperidine oxalate), a selective sigma receptor ligand, was tested against the behavioral and toxic effects of cocaine in laboratory animals.

Results

Acute administration of AC927 in male, Swiss Webster mice significantly attenuated cocaine-induced convulsions, lethality, and locomotor activity, at doses that alone had no significant effects on behavior. Subchronic administration of AC927 also attenuated cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in mice, at doses that alone had no effects on place conditioning. In drug discrimination studies in male, Sprague-Dawley rats, AC927 partially substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. When it was administered with cocaine, AC927 shifted the cocaine dose-response curve to the left, suggesting an enhancement of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. In non-human primates, AC927 was self-administered, maintaining responding that was intermediate between contingent saline and a maintenance dose of cocaine.

Conclusion

The ability of AC927 to elicit some cocaine-like appetitive properties and to also reduce many cocaine-induced behaviors suggests that it is a promising lead for the development of a medication to treat cocaine abuse.     

The discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in pigeons

This experiment was designed to elucidate the neurotransmitter systems that mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. Four pigeons were trained to peck one key following saline injections and a second key following methamphetamine injections (1.0 or 1.7 mg/kg, IM). Substitution tests revealed drug-appropriate responding following administration of the psychomotor stimulants methamphetamine, amphetamine and cocaine, the dopamine (DA) reuptake inhibitor bupropion, norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors imipramine and tomoxetine, and the serotonin (5-HT) releaser fenfluramine. Salinekey responding occurred following administration of the D₁ agonist SKF-38393, the D₁ antagonist SCH-23390, the α₂ receptor agonist clonidine, the α₁ antagonist prazosin, a nonselective β-antagonist propranolol and the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. The D₂/D₃ agonist quinpirole produced drug-appropriate responding in two pigeons and partial substitution in the remaining two pigeons. The 5HT_1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT produced drug-appropriate responding at higher doses (0.3–1.0 mg/kg), whereas much lower doses (0.003–0.1 mg/kg) antagonized the methamphetamine stimulus. The stimulus effects of methamphetamine were attenuated by pretreatment with prazosin, SCH-23390 and eticlopride, whereas pretreatment with propranolol and the 5-HT₃ antagonist, MDL 72222, failed reliably to attenuate drug key responding. These results suggest that NE and DA reuptake inhibition and 5-HT release mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine as do the 5-HT_1A and DA D₁ and D₂ receptors.     

News in brief

Psychostimulant abuse is a serious health and societal problem in industrialized and developing countries. However, the identification of an effective pharmacotherapy to treat it has remained elusive. It has long been known that many psychostimulant drugs, including cocaine and methamphetamine, interact with sigma receptors in the brain and heart, offering a logical target for medication development efforts. However, selective pharmacological agents and molecular biological tools have only recently become available to rigorously evaluate these receptors as viable medication development targets. The current review will summarize provocative preclinical data, demonstrating the ability of sigma receptor antagonists and antisense oligonucleotides to ameliorate cocaine-induced convulsions, lethality, locomotor activity and sensitization, and conditioned place-preference in rodents. Recent studies suggest that the protective effects of sigma receptor antagonists also extend to actions produced by methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, ethanol and other abused substances. Together, the data indicate that targeting sigma receptors, particularly the σ₁-subtype, may offer an innovative approach for combating the effects of cocaine, and perhaps other abused substances.     

Behavioral sensitization to the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rats

Sensitization to the discriminative stimulus effects of psychostimulants is not fully understood. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the development of sensitization to the discriminative stimulus of methamphetamine in rats. A dose-response curve for methamphetamine and a generalization test for cocaine were recorded in rats trained to discriminate between 1.0 mg/kg methamphetamine and saline. A significant leftward shift of the dose-response curve for methamphetamine and of the dose-generalization curve for cocaine was observed following repeated administration of methamphetamine (2.0 mg/kg) instead of saline. These findings suggest that repeated administration of methamphetamine can produce behavioral sensitization to the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rats.     

Self-administered ethanol as a discriminative stimulus in rats.

The neurochemical and behavioral effects produced by drugs can differ based on whether self-administered or experimenter-administered. In addition, self-administered drugs, particularly those taken orally or by inhalation, have peripheral stimulus effects that are not present following experimenter administration. One drug with highly prominent peripheral stimulus effects when taken orally is ethanol. The purpose of the present experiment was to examine whether orally self-administered (SA) ethanol would serve as a discriminative stimulus and to determine if the peripheral effects of ethanol play a major role in the discriminative stimulus of orally SA ethanol. Twelve Long-Evans rats were trained to orally self-administer 750 mg/kg of 10% (w/v) ethanol and then discriminate that dose of ethanol from SA water. Six of twelve rats were successfully trained to discriminate oral SA ethanol from water. Intraperitoneal experimenter-administered and orally SA ethanol doses of 100-1320 mg/kg were tested for substitution. SA and i.p. ethanol doses of 750, 1000, and 1320 mg/kg fully substituted for the SA training dose. SA doses of 100, 320 and 560 mg/kg partially substituted for the SA ethanol training dose, whereas the 100 and 320 mg/kg i.p. ethanol doses did not substitute for SA ethanol. The ED(50) values for SA and i.p. ethanol were not significantly different from one another. The results indicate that SA ethanol can serve as a discriminative stimulus in rats and that i.p. ethanol can substitute for SA ethanol. In addition, the results also show that the discriminative stimulus effects of SA ethanol are primarily mediated by CNS drug effects.     

Chlormethiazole potentiates the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rats

Chlormethiazole is a positive modulator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptors used in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal seizures. It recently has been reported to attenuate seizures engendered by acute and repeated exposure to cocaine in mice and neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine in rats. The aim of the present study was to determine whether chlormethiazole could also attenuate the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, a behavior predictive of the subjective effects of methamphetamine in humans. In Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg methamphetamine [intraperitoneally (i.p.)] from saline under a fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery, the ability of chlormethiazole (i.p.) to (1) substitute for methamphetamine, (2) antagonize effects of methamphetamine and to (3) shift the methamphetamine dose-effect function was investigated. Chlormethiazole (18 and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) partially substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine when administered alone (maximum group average, 60% responses on the methamphetamine-appropriate lever). Chlormethiazole did not attenuate effects of methamphetamine when coadministered with the training dose of methamphetamine. Instead, chlormethiazole potentiated the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine as demonstrated by a significant (about 2.5-fold) leftward and upward shift in the methamphetamine dose-effect function in the presence of chlormethiazole (10 mg/kg). In conclusion, the present findings suggest that there is a behavioral interaction between methamphetamine and chlormethiazole. The profile of this interaction is qualitatively different from that of methamphetamine and classical GABAergic drugs (i.e., benzodiazepines and barbiturates), suggesting the involvement of non-GABAergic mechanisms in the effects produced by chlormethiazole.     

Blockade of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in rhesus monkeys with the D1 dopamine antagonist SCH 23390

To investigate the role of D₁ dopamine receptors in the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, two rhesus monkeys were trained in a two-lever, food-reinforced, drug discrimination paradigm to discriminate cocaine (0.2 mg/kg, IM) from saline. Administration of various doses of cocaine resulted in a dose-related increase in the percentage of responses that occurred on the drug-appropriate lever. Administration of the D₁ antagonist SCH 23390 20 min before cocaine reduced drug-appropriate responding from 100% to 0% in all subjects and increased by 4–8-fold the cocaine dose necessary to induce drug-appropriate responding. A mutual antagonism of the rate-decreasing effects of cocaine and SCH 23390 was also observed. These findings suggest that D₁ receptors play a significant role in the discriminative stimulus and rate-decreasing effects of cocaine.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine, alone and in combination with buprenorphine, morphine and naltrexone

Rats were trained to discriminate a dose of 10.0 mg/kg cocaine from saline. During substitution tests, both cocaine (5.6–10.0 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (1.0–3.0 mg/kg) produced greater than 80% responding on the cocaine-appropriate lever. In contrast, buprenorphine (0.03–0.56 mg/kg), morphine (0.3–10.0 mg/kg) and naltrexone (1.0–10.0 mg/kg) failed to substitute for the cocaine stimulus, up to doses that substantially decreased rate of responding. When the cocaine dose-effect curve was redetermined in the presence of selected doses of buprenorphine, the amount of cocaine-appropriate responding following a low dose of cocaine (1.0 mg/kg) was increased slightly whereas cocaine-appropriate responding following higher doses of cocaine (3.0 and 5.6 mg/kg) was reduced slightly. Responding following the training dose of cocaine (10.0 mg/kg) was not changed. These results indicate that buprenorphine produced only small alterations in cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects and that the nature of these alterations differed depending on the dose of cocaine examined.     

Effects of ethanol on cocaine discrimination in rats

Ethanol and cocaine are frequently abused in combination, but little is known about how the subjective effects of the two drugs interact. The ability of ethanol and other GABA(A)-active compounds to alter the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine was tested. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg ip) from saline using either single- or cumulative-dosing methods. In single-dose testing, ethanol (0.1-0.5 g/kg) dose-dependently decreased cocaine-appropriate responding following the training dose of cocaine. Ethanol (0.5 g/kg) produced a rightward shift in the cocaine cumulative dose-effect curve. Ethanol (0.1-1.0 g/kg) failed to substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and the higher doses (1-2 g/kg) completely suppressed responding. Indirect GABA(A) agonists diazepam (benzodiazepine site) and pentobarbital (barbiturate site) did not block the discriminative stimulus effects of cumulative doses of cocaine. The GABA(A) antagonist pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) (10-40 mg/kg) did not substitute for cocaine. These findings suggest that ethanol can modulate the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, and that these effects may not be mediated by the actions of ethanol at the GABA(A) receptor.     

Modulation of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine by the histaminergic system.

The role of the histaminergic system in the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine was examined in rats trained to discriminate between saline and cocaine (10 mg/kg) or methamphetamine (1.0 mg/kg). L-histidine (400 mg/kg), a precursor of histamine, significantly enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine. Previous studies have revealed the existence of several histamine receptor types, H1-, H2-, and H3-receptors. These enhancing effects of L-histidine on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine were attenuated by 5.0 mg/kg of pyrilamine (an H1-receptor antagonist), but not by 1.0 mg/kg of zolantidine (an H2-receptor antagonist), suggesting that these enhancing effects of L-histidine were mediated through the activation of H1-receptors. Thioperamide (7.5 mg/kg), an H3-receptor antagonist, also significantly enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine. However, neither pyrilamine nor zolantidine affected the enhancing effects of thioperamide, unlike the results attained with L-histidine. Therefore our findings suggest that the histaminergic system may modify the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine mediated through H1- and H3-receptors.     

Dopamine D1D2 antagonist combinations as antagonists of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine

Although data suggest that the dopaminergic system mediates the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, neither selective D₁ or D₂ dopamine agonists nor selective D₁ or D₂ antagonists substitute reliably for or consistently block these effects. These findings suggest that concurrent activity at these receptor subtypes may underlie this discrimination. Accordingly, it would be expected that simultaneous blockade of these receptors may be necessary to block it fully. The ability of various combinations of the D₁ antagonist, SCH 23390, and the D₂ antagonist, haloperidol, were tested for their ability to block the cocaine stimulus in rats trained to discriminate cocaine (7.5, 10, or 13 mg/kg) from vehicle. Antagonist combinations decreased the percentage of cocaine-appropriate responses 10–95% below the cocaine baseline at doses of the antagonist that were inactive when given separately. These findings support the position that activity at D₁-like and D₂-like receptor subtypes may account for more of the pharmacological action of cocaine than activation of a single dopamine receptor subtype.     

The GPR88 receptor agonist 2-PCCA does not alter the behavioral effects of methamphetamine in rats

GPR88 is a novel orphan G protein-coupled receptor that is primarily located at the striatum. Genetic knockout studies reveal phenotypes of increased dopamine D₂ receptor sensitivity in mice, suggesting that GPR88 receptors may be involved in the modulation of dopaminergic system. However, there is no study that examines the pharmacological effects of GPR88 receptor ligands in in vivo preparations. This study examined the effects of a GPR88 receptor agonist, (1R, 2R)-2-pyridin-2-yl-cyclopropane carboxylic acid ((2S, 3S)-2-amino-3-methyl-pentyl)-(4′-propylbiphenyl-4-yl)-amide (2-PCCA), on the motor activity in rats and on methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity and discriminative stimulus effects. 2-PCCA (0.1–3.2 mg/kg) dose-dependently decreased the locomotor activity in rats and, when studied in combination with 1.0 mg/kg methamphetamine, also dose-dependently decreased methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity. However, the dose of 2-PCCA that significantly attenuated methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity was also the dose that by itself markedly decreased the baseline locomotor activity. In rats discriminating 0.32 mg/kg methamphetamine, 2-PCCA (1–3.2 mg/kg) itself did not produce methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects and, when studied in combination, did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. Together, these data have provided the first line of evidence that activation of GPR88 receptors does not alter the behavioral effects of methamphetamine. The potential implications of these findings are also discussed.     

Dopamine D2/D3 receptors modulate cocaine's reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects in rhesus monkeys

Numerous studies have suggested that dopamine (DA) D2 and D3 receptors are involved in the behavioral effects of cocaine. The present experiments evaluated the reinforcing and cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of several D2/D3 agonists in rhesus monkeys. In the first experiment, animals (n = 4) were trained to self-administer 0.03 mg/kg/inj cocaine under a fixed-interval (FI) 5-min schedule. When substituted for cocaine, the D2/D3 agonist quinpirole (0.003-0.03 mg/kg/inj) functioned as a reinforcer in all monkeys. In two cocaine-naive monkeys trained to respond under an FI 3-min schedule of food presentation, quinpirole maintained low rates of responding in one subject, while at the highest dose (0.03 mg/kg/inj) it functioned as a reinforcer in the second monkey. In this animal, increased activity was observed at this dose, which may have contributed to the overall rate of responding. In the second experiment, monkeys (n = 4) were trained to discriminate cocaine from saline using a two-lever, food-reinforced, drug discrimination procedure. The D2/D3 agonists quinpirole, (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT, and R-( + )-7-OH-DPAT fully substituted for cocaine. However, the time-course of substitution differed between quinpirole, which substituted for cocaine 10 min after administration, and (+/-)- and R-(+)-7-OH-DPAT, which required 60-min pretreatments. The behavioral potencies, as determined from ED50, values, correlated with previously reported in vitro binding affinity and functional activity at the D3 receptor [R-(+ )-7-OH-DPAT > (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT > quinpirole]. These results further indicate that direct-acting D2/D3 agonists can function as reinforcers and produce cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects, and support the idea that D3 receptors should continue to be a valuable target for future behavioral studies evaluating cocaine's mechanisms of action.     

Effects of mixed-action kappa/mu opioids on cocaine self-administration and cocaine discrimination by rhesus monkeys.

kappa-Opioid agonists may functionally antagonize some behavioral effects of cocaine, but the role of mixed kappa/mu receptor activity is unclear. The effects of three mixed kappa/mu agonists (MCL-101, (-)cyclorphan, and Mr2034) and one kappa-selective agonist (enadoline) on cocaine self-administration and cocaine discrimination were compared in rhesus monkeys. Acute treatment with all kappa agonists dose dependently reduced cocaine-maintained responding and produced a downward shift in the cocaine self-administration dose-effect curve (0.001-0.32 mg/kg/inj, i.v.). During 7 days of chronic treatment, (-)cyclorphan (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h) and MCL-101 (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h) each dose dependently reduced cocaine self-administration maintained by a dose near the peak of the cocaine self-administration dose-effect curve. MCL-101 (0.032 mg/kg/h) produced selective and sustained decreases in cocaine self-administration, whereas (-)cyclorphan (0.032 mg/kg/h) had selective but transient effects. In addition, these mixed kappa/mu agonists produced fewer side effects (some salivation) than the kappa-selective agonist (sedation, salivation, emesis). However, none of these kappa agonists substituted for or antagonized cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects in monkeys trained to discriminate cocaine (0.4 mg/kg, i.m.) from saline. Thus, kappa and mixed kappa/mu-opioid agonists may reduce cocaine self-administration without altering cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects. Mixed kappa/mu agonists appear to offer some advantages over selective kappa agonists as potential treatments for cocaine abuse.