Decision analysis on alternative treatment strategies for favorable-prognosis, early-stage Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: To compare the therapeutic outcomes of various treatment strategies in early-stage, favorable-prognosis Hodgkin's disease (HD) using methods of decision analysis. METHODS: We constructed a decision-analytic model to determine the life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy for a hypothetical cohort of clinically or pathologically staged 25-year-old patients with early-stage, favorable-prognosis HD treated with varying degrees of initial therapy. Markov models were used to simulate the lifetime clinical course of patients, and baseline probability estimates were derived from published study results. RESULTS: Among patients with pathologic stage (PS) I to II, mantle and para-aortic (MPA) radiotherapy was favored over combined-modality therapy (CMT), mantle radiotherapy, and chemotherapy by 1.18, 1.33, and 1.55 years, respectively. For patients with clinical stage (CS) I to II, the treatment options of MPA-splenic radiotherapy, CMT, and chemotherapy yielded similar survival outcomes. Sensitivity analysis showed that the decision between CMT and MPA-splenic radiotherapy was highly influenced by the precise values of the estimates of treatment efficacy and long-term morbidity, the quality-of-life value assigned to the postsplenic irradiation state, and the time discount value used in the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that even if future studies doubled the precision of the estimates of the treatment-related variables, it would be impossible to demonstrate the superiority of one treatment over the other. CONCLUSION: Our model predicted that on average, MPA radiotherapy was clearly the preferred treatment for PS I to II patients. For CS I to II patients the treatment decision is a toss-up between MPA-splenic radiotherapy and CMT, emphasizing the importance of patient preference exploration and shared decision making between patient and physician when choosing between treatments.     

Health status and quality of life in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease treated on Southwest Oncology Group Study 9133.

PURPOSE: We describe the short and intermediate-term quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in patients treated on a randomized clinical trial in early-stage Hodgkin's disease (Southwest Oncology Group [SWOG] 9133) comparing subtotal lymphoid irradiation (STLI) with combined-modality treatment (CMT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-seven patients participated in the QOL study (SWOG 9208), completing several standardized instruments (Symptom Distress Scale; Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System - Short Form; Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Vitality Scale; and a health perception item), as well as questions about work, marital status, and concerns about having children. This article reports on results from baseline before random assignment, at 6 months, and at 1 and 2 years after random assignment. RESULTS: Patients receiving CMT experienced significantly greater symptom distress (P <.0001), fatigue (P =.001), and poorer QOL (P =.015) at 6 months than the STLI patients, reflecting a shorter time since completion of therapy in the CMT arm. Importantly, patients in the two groups did not differ on any outcomes at the 1-and 2-year assessments. Both patient groups reported significantly more fatigue before treatment than healthy reference populations, and fatigue did not improve in either group after treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease experience a short-term decrease in QOL and an increase in symptoms and fatigue with treatment, which is more severe with CMT; by 1 year, however, CMT and STLI patients report similar outcomes. Fatigue scores for both arms were lower at baseline than scores for the general population and did not return to normal levels 2 years after random assignment. The mechanisms responsible for this lingering problem warrant further investigation.     

Phase III randomized intergroup trial of subtotal lymphoid irradiation versus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and subtotal lymphoid irradiation for stage IA to IIA Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: The management of early-stage Hodgkin's disease in the United States is controversial. To evaluate whether staging laparotomy could be safely avoided in early-stage Hodgkin's disease and whether chemotherapy should be a part of the treatment of nonlaparotomy staged patients, a phase III intergroup trial was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred forty-eight patients with clinical stage IA to IIA supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease were randomized without staging laparotomy to treatment with either subtotal lymphoid irradiation (STLI) or combined-modality therapy (CMT) consisting of three cycles of doxorubicin and vinblastine followed by STLI. RESULTS: The study was closed at the second, planned, interim analysis because of a markedly superior failure-free survival (FFS) rate for patients on the CMT arm (94%) compared with the STLI arm (81%). With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 10 patients have experienced relapse or died on the chemoradiotherapy arm, compared with 34 on the radiotherapy arm (P <.001). Few deaths have occurred on either arm (three deaths on CMT and seven deaths on STLI). Treatment was well tolerated, with only one death on each arm attributed to treatment. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that it is possible to obtain a high FFS rate in a large group of stage IA to IIA patients without performing staging laparotomy and that three cycles of chemotherapy plus STLI provide a superior FFS compared with STLI alone. Extended follow-up is necessary to assess freedom from second relapse, overall survival, late toxicities, patterns of treatment failure, and quality of life.     

150例早期霍奇金淋巴瘤的综合治疗

目的 对比单纯化疗、单纯放疗与综合治疗对早期霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)的疗效.方法 回顾性分析150例Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期(早期)HL患者的临床资料,按照初次治疗方式分为单纯化疗组(22例)、单纯放疗组(18例)、化疗联合放疗的综合治疗组(109例)和手术组(1例).化疗方案以ABVD和MOPP为主,放疗方式主要包括受累野放疗、扩大野放疗和次全淋巴结照射.结果 结节硬化型、混合细胞型、淋巴细胞为主型、淋巴细胞消减型和结节性淋巴细胞为主型HL分别为84、39、23、3和1例.全组有72例患者资料完整,可判断预后,其中以欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织及德国霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组标准判断为0分者分别占36.1%和29.2%.全组完全缓解33例,部分缓解109例,疾病稳定5例,疾病进展3例.全组中位随访71.5个月,6年治疗失败率为18.8%,7年总生存率为89.3%.单因素分析显示,综合治疗的疗效显著优于单纯化疗,结节硬化型和混合细胞型的治疗失败风险明显低于淋巴细胞为主型(均P＜0.05).多因素分析显示,治疗方式可以显著影响预后,单纯化疗发生治疗失败的风险是综合治疗的2.52倍(P=0.004).单因素和多因素分析均未发现总生存时间的影响因素.综合治疗组的急性不良反应发生率较单纯化疗组或单纯放疗组高,主要表现为白细胞减低、胃肠道反应和脱发.结论 对于早期HL,综合治疗可降低治疗失败风险,但不良反应较重.     

Stage III Hodgkin's disease: improved survival with combined modality therapy as compared with radiation therapy alone

This is a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with pathologically stage IIIA and IIIB Hodgkin's disease treated from April 1969 to December 1982. The median follow-up was 108 months. Treatment consisted of radiation therapy (RT) alone in 54 patients and combined radiation therapy and MOPP (nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) chemotherapy (CMT) in 66 patients. Stage III patients treated with CMT have an improved actuarial 12-year survival as compared with patients treated with RT alone with MOPP reserved for relapse (80% v 64%; P = .026). The 12-year actuarial freedom from first relapse by treatment for stage III patients is 83% and 40%, respectively (P less than .0001). Improved survivals following combined modality therapy are seen for the following subgroups of stage III patients: stage III2, 66% (CMT) v 44% (total nodal irradiation; TNI), P = .04; stage III1, 97% (CMT) v 73% (TNI), P = .05; stage III mixed cellularity or lymphocyte depletion histology, 94% (CMT) v 65% (TNI), P = .007; and stage III extensive splenic involvement, 77% (CMT) v 58% (TNI), P = .02. These survival differences are not seen in patients with nodular sclerosis or lymphocyte predominance histology or in patients with minimal splenic involvement. These data indicate that the initial use of CMT in stage III Hodgkin's disease results in an improved survival as compared with initial treatment with RT with MOPP reserved for relapse. Patients with limited Stage IIIA disease may still be candidates for radiation therapy alone.     

Patterns of practice survey for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma in the U.S

BACKGROUND: Nonsmall cell lung carcinoma comprises approximately 75% of all lung carcinoma cases in the U.S. Newly evolving strategies have created considerable controversy regarding the optimal treatment for patients diagnosed with this disease. METHODS: A 17-item survey was designed to collect demographic data and information regarding practice patterns for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, including patient assessment, treatment approaches, and roles of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Surveys were mailed in the summer of 1997 to approximately 9200 oncologists of all types throughout the U.S. Practice settings included private office, private hospital, academic, university-affiliated office, government, and Veterans Administration institutions. RESULTS: Approximately 10% of the oncologists responded (n = 979), including 499 medical oncologists (51%), 464 radiation oncologists (47%), and 16 others (2%). For the adjuvant treatment of surgically resected N1-2 disease, combined modality treatment was preferred over radiation therapy alone by medical oncologists (48% vs. 16%; P<0.001) and radiation therapy alone was preferred over combined modality treatment by radiation oncologists (55% vs. 38%; P<0.001). The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin was the preferred first-line regimen for all stages of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma by the majority of medical oncologists (55%), whereas the majority of radiation oncologists (58%) chose the combination of etoposide and platinum. With regard to the optimal combined modality approach, respondents were divided evenly between concurrent chemoradiotherapy (34%) and sequential chemoradiotherapy (31%). Overall, respondents reported basing treatment decisions largely on published literature (55%) compared with personal experience (19%), seminars and colleagues (16%), and clinical trial availability (10%) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirms many differences in practice patterns among medical oncologists and radiation oncologists in the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and suggests the need for the multidisciplinary management of this entity. In addition, the current study demonstrates that reliance on the medical literature as a basis for treatment steadily declines the longer the physician has been in practice.     

Influences on oncologists' adoption of new agents in adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Little is known about how oncologists' adopt new treatments for breast cancer. This study investigated influences on oncologists' adoption of paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, 9 months after presentation of phase III data suggesting improved disease-free and overall survival when paclitaxel was added to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for such patients. METHODS: Self-reported data were collected with a mail survey of a random sample of 1,200 oncologists practicing in the United States. Using Rogers' model, we measured four types of influences on adoption of innovation: (1) communication channels, (2) innovation characteristics, (3) a practitioner's social system, and (4) physician characteristics. Multiple regression analysis assessed the associations between oncologist adoption of paclitaxel for early-stage breast cancer patients and variables representing the modeled influences on adoption. RESULTS: On average, respondents (n = 181) reported having adopted paclitaxel for 37% of their early-stage breast cancer patients. The overall model was significant, with seven variables associated (P < or = .05) with adoption of paclitaxel. Significant influences on adoption included use of symposia as a therapy information source, physician experience with paclitaxel to treat late-stage breast cancer, and perceived advantage in efficacy of paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: As new modalities become available to treat cancer, it is vital to understand what factors influence oncologists and patients when choosing to use them. Those parties interested in fostering the adoption of new breast cancer treatments should address features of communication channels (eg, use of symposia), characteristics of new treatments (eg, perceived advantage in efficacy), physicians' social systems (eg, patient requests), and characteristics of potential adopters (eg, previous experience with the treatment).     

High-dose BEAM chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin's disease is unlikely to be associated with a major increased risk of secondary MDS/AML.

Hodgkin's disease is curable in the majority of patients, although a proportion of patients are resistant to or relapse after initial therapy. High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell support has become the standard salvage therapy for patients failing chemotherapy, but there have been reports of a high incidence of myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukaemia (MDS/AML) following such treatment. Patients who receive such therapy form a selected group, however, who have already been subjected to other leukaemogenic factors, such as treatment with alkylating agents. In order to ascertain the true risk of MDS/AML, comparison must be made with other patients subjected to the same risks but not undergoing transplantation. We report a retrospective comparative study of 4576 patients with Hodgkin's disease from the BNLI and UCLH Hodgkin's databases, which includes 595 patients who have received a transplant. Statistical analysis including Cox's proportional hazards multivariate regression model with time-dependent covariates was employed. This analysis reveals that the risk of developing MDS/AML was dominated by three factors, namely quantity of prior therapy (relative risk [RR] 2.01, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.49-2.71, for each treatment block, P < 0.0001) and whether the patient had been exposed to MOPP (RR 3.61, 95% CI 1.64-7.95, P = 0.0009) or lomustine chemotherapy (RR 4.53, 95% CI 1.96-10.44, P = 0.001). Following adjustment for these factors in the multivariate model the relative risk associated with transplantation was 1.83 (95% CI 0.66-5.11, P = 0.25). This study provides no evidence of a significantly increased risk of MDS/AML associated with BEAM therapy and autologous transplantation in Hodgkin's disease. Concern over MDS/AML should not mitigate against the timely use of this treatment modality.     

早期霍奇金病综合治疗中受累野照射的临床疗效

目的 评价Ⅰ、Ⅱ期霍奇金病（HD）患者综合治疗时受累野照射的疗效和毒副作用,并与扩大野照射进行比较。方法 早期HD 88例,根据Ann Arbor分期,ⅠA期12例（13．7％）,ⅡA期56例（63．6％）,ⅡB期20例（22．7％）。全部患者接受化疗和放疗综合治疗,先化疗后放疗患者83例,先放疗后化疗患者5例。化疗多采用ABVD或ABVD／MOPP方案;受累野照射42例,扩大野照射46例。结果 全组有6例膈上原发HD治疗后复发,受累野组和扩大野组各3例。扩大野组有1例照射野内复发,受累野组有1例在邻近照射部位的腋窝复发,其余4例患者均表现为结外器官或膈下淋巴结受侵。全组患者1、2、3年总生存率分别为100．0％、98．6％和96．3％,受累野组患者分别为100．0％、97．1％和97．1％,扩大野组患者分别为100．0％、100．0％和95．8％,两组生存率差异无统计学意义（P=0．86）。受累野组1、2、3年无进展生存率分别为97．6％、94．8％和91．7％,扩大野组分别为97．8％、93．2％和93．2％,两组无进展生存率差异无统计学意义（P=0．65）。发生Ⅰ度和Ⅱ度白细胞减少症者,受累野组3例（7．2％）,扩大野组9例（19．5％,P=0．089）。结论 Ⅰ、Ⅱ期HD患者进行综合治疗时,采用受累野照射可获得与扩大野照射相同的疗效,且能减少并发症的发生。     

Hodgkin's lymphoma in younger patients: lessons learned on the road to success

Despite significant improvements in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma over the past 2 decades, physicians continue to face dilemmas in therapy for the disease, and many cured patients live with complications of treatment. Newer therapeutic options are still needed for the disease, to minimize complications and to improve the treatment of patients in relapse. This review considers the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma in younger patients, addressing such issues as which patients with early-stage disease may require radiotherapy, what prognostic factors provide information that can affect treatment choices in patients with advanced disease, and what we have learned about treatment complications in this setting.     

Results of a prospective trial of mantle irradiation alone for selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of mantle radiation therapy alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1988 and June 2000, 87 selected patients with pathologic stage (PS) IA to IIA or clinical stage (CS) IA Hodgkin's disease were entered onto a single-arm prospective trial of treatment with mantle irradiation alone. Eighty-three of 87 patients had > or = 1 year of follow-up after completion of mantle irradiation and were included for analysis in this study. Thirty-seven patients had PS IA, 40 had PS IIA, and six had CS IA disease. Histologic distribution was as follows: nodular sclerosis (n = 64), lymphocyte predominant (n = 15), mixed cellularity (n = 3), and unclassified (n = 1). Median follow-up time was 61 months. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial rates of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival were 86% and 100%, respectively. Eleven of 83 patients relapsed at a median time of 27 months. Nine of the 11 relapses contained at least a component below the diaphragm. All 11 patients who developed recurrent disease were alive without evidence of Hodgkin's disease at the time of last follow-up. The 5-year FFTF in the 43 stage I patients was 92% compared with 78% in the 40 stage II patients (P =.04). Significant differences in FFTF were not seen by histology (P =.26) or by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer H-5F eligibility (P =.25). CONCLUSION: Mantle irradiation alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease is associated with disease control rates comparable to those seen with extended field irradiation. The FFTF is especially favorable among stage I patients.     

Long-term survival and competing causes of death in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease treated at age 50 or younger.

PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term survival and the pattern and timing of excess mortality in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1969 and 1997, 1,080 patients age 50 or younger were treated for clinical stage IA to IIB Hodgkin's disease. Overall survival was determined, and prognostic factors were assessed. Relative risk and absolute excess risk (AR) of mortality were calculated for the entire cohort and by prognostic groups (on the basis of B symptoms, mediastinal status, and number of sites, modified from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12 years. The 15- and 20-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 84% and 78%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models showed that number of involved sites (P =.006), mediastinal status (P =.02), and histology (P =.02) were independent predictors of death from all causes. The AR of mortality in patients with a favorable prognosis increased over time, whereas for those with an unfavorable prognosis, the AR peaked in the first 5 years, predominantly from Hodgkin's disease. The relative risk of mortality from all causes, causes other than Hodgkin's disease, second tumors, and cardiac disease remained significantly elevated more than 20 years after treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients treated for early-stage Hodgkin's disease have a sustained excess mortality risk despite good control of the disease. Treatment reduction efforts in patients with early-stage, favorable-prognosis disease should continue, but for patients with an unfavorable prognosis, modified treatment may not be advisable. The excess mortality noted beyond two decades underscores the importance of long-term follow-up care in patients treated for Hodgkin's disease.     

Comparison of MOPP versus ABVD as salvage therapy in patients who relapse after radiation therapy alone for Hodgkin's disease.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine salvage outcome in patients with Hodgkin's disease who relapse after radiation therapy, and to compare the efficacy of mechlorethamine, Oncovin, procarbazine and prednisone (MOPP) versus Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) as salvage treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with Hodgkin's disease (97 with stage I-II disease at presentation) who relapsed after radiation therapy alone were salvaged with either MOPP or ABVD. Freedom from second relapse (FFSR) and overall survival (OS) were determined, and prognostic factors for salvage outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: The median follow-up time since salvage therapy was 12 years. The 10-year FFSR and OS rates were 70% and 89%, respectively. Forty-one patients were salvaged with MOPP and 59 received ABVD. The type of salvage chemotherapy did not significantly influence FFSR or OS. Age >50 years at initial diagnosis was the only significant predictor for an inferior FFSR and OS on both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The two salvage regimens of MOPP and ABVD had similar efficacy in this group of patients with predominantly early-stage disease at initial radiation therapy. The inferior salvage outcome in patients aged >50 years is a contributing factor to the overall poor prognosis of patients presenting with Hodgkin's disease at an older age.     

Importance of faith on medical decisions regarding cancer care.

PURPOSE: Decisions regarding cancer treatment choices can be difficult. Several factors may influence the decision to undergo treatment. One poorly understood factor is the influence of a patient's faith on how they make medical decisions. We compared the importance of faith on treatment decisions among doctors, patients, and patient caregivers. METHODS: One hundred patients with advanced lung cancer, their caregivers, and 257 medical oncologists were interviewed. Participants were asked to rank the importance of the following factors that might influence treatment decisions: cancer doctor's recommendation, faith in God, ability of treatment to cure disease, side effects, family doctor's recommendation, spouse's recommendation, and children's recommendation. RESULTS: All three groups ranked the oncologist's recommendation as most important. Patients and caregivers ranked faith in God second, whereas physicians placed it last (P <.0001). Patients who placed a high priority on faith in God had less formal education (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients and caregivers agree on the factors that are important in deciding treatment for advanced lung cancer but differ substantially from doctors. All agree that the oncologist's recommendation is most important. This is the first study to demonstrate that, for some, faith is an important factor in medical decision making, more so than even the efficacy of treatment. If faith plays an important role in how some patients decide treatment, and physicians do not account for it, the decision-making process may be unsatisfactory to all involved. Future studies should clarify how faith influences individual decisions regarding treatment.     

Prospective study of combined modality treatment or radiotherapy alone in the management of early-stage adult Hodgkin's disease

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of combined modality treatment (CMT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone in the management of clinical Stage I-IIA adult Hodgkin's disease patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-seven patients with supradiaphragmatic clinical Stage I-IIA Hodgkin's disease without bulky mediastinal lymphadenopathy were enrolled into this prospective study between September 1997 and February 2002. Patients with very favorable criteria presenting with one or two nonbulky nodal areas involved, an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of <50 mm/h, age <40 years, and either lymphocyte predominant or nodular sclerosing histologic findings were treated by RT alone. Patients missing any of these favorable criteria were classified as the other favorable group and were treated with three courses of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapy followed by involved-field RT. The median age was 36 years (range, 19-53 years). Of the 47 patients, 15 were women and 32 were men. Only 3 patients were classified as the most favorable group and treated with mantle RT alone; the remaining 44 were treated with CMT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 51 months (range, 20-74 months). Only 2 patients developed recurrence, both out of the irradiated field, one in the contralateral neck and the other in the abdomen. The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rate was 95.4% and 97.8%, respectively. Although none of the prognostic factors were statistically significant for relapse-free survival, a trend was noted for the response to chemotherapy (p = 0.06). Only 2 patients developed treatment-related complications. One patient treated with mantle RT alone developed severe ischemic heart disease and one in the CMT arm developed subclinical hypothyroidism. CONCLUSION: Despite the short follow-up, CMT or RT alone tailored according to the clinical prognostic factors were successful in terms of disease control in clinical Stage I-IIA Hodgkin's disease. Longer follow-up is required to make definitive conclusions.     

Transfer of follow-up care to family physicians for early-stage breast cancer

AimsAs a result of the rising prevalence of breast cancer and improved adjuvant treatment strategies, oncologists are faced with an ever-increasing workload of providing long-term follow-up care for early-stage breast cancer patients. In order to cope with these growing demands, innovative follow-up strategies are urgently required.Materials and methodsTo explore if patient transfer back to the family physician for follow-up was a potential option, a prospective programme of planned discharge was established for all patients who had completed adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy or had started adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patient and family physician information packages were also provided.ResultsBetween April and August 2005, of the 193 patients assessed for transfer back to the family physician for follow-up care, transfer was possible in 43%. Fifty-seven per cent (or 110 patients) were unsuitable for transfer back to the family physician. The reasons cited among those deemed unsuitable for transfer were as follows: clinical trial enrolment (50.9%), ongoing endocrine treatment (31.8%), new symptoms (6.3%), and patient refusal (0.9%). In both discharged and non-discharged groups, patients were also frequently being followed by other oncologists (surgical and/or radiation).ConclusionTransfer of care back to family physicians for follow-up may offer a strategy to control workload volumes, and thus enable oncologists to focus their efforts on newly diagnosed and advanced-stage patients with more complex patient care needs.     

Prognostic factors for subdiaphragmatic involvement in clinical stage I-II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin''s disease: a retrospective analysis of the GHSG.

Background: Staging laparotomy and splenectomy were routinely performed in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease (HD) qualifying for radiotherapy alone to determine the exact extent of disease. However, staging laparotomy is associated with a considerable number of side effects, warranting more sophisticated diagnostic procedures and new therapy strategies. We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing staging laparotomy to identify pretherapy risk factors predicting the probability of abdominal disease and to define high-risk groups that might benefit from staging laparotomy and subsequent stage-adjusted treatment.Patients and methods: Between February 1988 and January 1993, 391 patients with CS I–II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease underwent staging laparotomy and splenectomy according to the treatment policy of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG) for early stages of Hodgkin's disease. Univariate and multivariate analysis of pretherapeutic clinical characteristics were performed in an attempt to predict staging laparotomy results and to identify risk groups.Results: Of the 391 patients, 81 (21%) had subdiaphragmatic disease. Eighteen percent were upstaged to PS III and three percent to PS IV. By a multivariate model the following parameters were independent risk factors for positive surgical staging: left cervical involvement (P < 0.001), mediastinal involvement (P < 0.009), Karnofsky performance status (P < 0.004) and histology (P < 0.04). In our analysis gender (P < 0.08) and ESR (P < 0.06), often described as of high prognostic value, was not significant. The presence of systemic symptoms, number of involved areas and clinical stage were not associated with abdominal disease, as described in several former publications.To define high-risk groups, which comprise at least 15% of patients of the cohort and have a risk of subdiaphragmatic involvement of >35%, combinations of only two or three of the predictive factors were analyzed. With respect to these criteria the following subgroups of patients were identified as having a high risk for subdiaphragmatic disease (>35%): a) left cervical lymph node involvement and no mediastinal involvement (n = 98, observed risk 36%); b) no mediastinal involvement and MC/LD histology (n= 113, observed risk 40%).Conclusions: We conclude that initial clinical characteristics are predictive for occult abdominal involvement in early clinical stages of Hodgkin's disease. The impact of these risk factors on future therapeutical strategies have to be evaluated.     

Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Breast conservation surgery (BCS) and mastectomy have equivalent survival outcomes for women with breast carcinoma, but treatment decisions are affected by many factors. The current study evaluated the impact of patient and physician factors on surgical decision-making. METHODS: Statistical analyses were performed on a prospective multicenter study of patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Patient, physician, and geographic factors were considered. RESULTS: Of 4086 patients, BCS was performed in 2762 (67.6%) and mastectomy was performed in 1324 (32.4%). The median tumor size was 1.5 cm (range, < 0.1-9.0 cm) in patients undergoing BCS and 1.9 cm (range, 0.1-11.0 cm) in patients undergoing mastectomy (P < 0.00001). The median age of patients undergoing BCS was 59 years (range, 27-100 yrs), whereas patients who underwent mastectomy were older (median age of 63 yrs, range, 27-96 yrs [P < 0.00001]). Physicians in academic practices performed more lumpectomies than those who were not in an academic practice (70.9% vs. 65.7%; P = 0.001). More breast conservation procedures were performed by surgeons with a higher percentage of breast practice (P = 0.012). Geographic location was found to be significant, with the Northeast having the highest rate of breast conservation (70.8%) and the Southeast having the lowest (63.2%; P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, patient age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.455; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.247-1.699 [P < 0.001]), tumor size (P < 0.001), tumor palpability (OR: 0.613; 95% CI, 0.524-0.716 [P < 0.001]), histologic subtype (P = 0.018), tumor location in the breast (P < 0.001), physician academic affiliation (OR: 1.193; 95% CI: 1.021-1.393 [P = 0.026]), and geographic location (P = 0.045) were found to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment decisions were found to be related to patient clinicopathologic features, surgeon academic affiliation, and geographic location. Future studies will elucidate the communication and psychosocial factors that may influence patient decision-making.     

Can patients with early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma be treated without bone marrow biopsy?

BACKGROUND: Data on the incidence of bone marrow (BM) involvement in early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are lacking. Although BM biopsy is a safe procedure, it is often poorly tolerated. This analysis aims to assess the incidence of BM involvement and to identify parameters predicting BM involvement in early-stage DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-two patients with radiological stages 1 and 2 disease were analysed. The data collected were age, sex, presence of B symptoms, white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet count, haemoglobin (Hb), serum lactate dehydrogenase level, serum beta(2)-microglobulin level, presence of extranodal disease, and the presence of bulky disease (defined as >7 cm). RESULTS: Overall incidence of BM involvement was 3.6%. Hb < 10 g/dl (P=0.02), WBC count < 4 x 10(9)/l (P=0.007) and bulky disease (P=0.06) were found to be predictive of BM involvement. Among the 120 patients without any of these three factors, only one patient had BM involvement (0.83%; 95% confidence interval 0.02% to 4.6%). The absence of all three factors gave a negative predictive value of 99.2%. Overall 3-year survival for patients without all three risk factors was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: BM biopsy may be safely omitted in selected patients with early-stage DLBCL.