Inherited thrombophilic risk factors in a large cohort of individuals referred to Italian thrombophilia centers: distinct roles in different clinical settings.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite inherited thrombophilic risk factors being strongly associated with vein thrombosis, decisions on whether to screen subjects for these factors vary in different clinical settings. DESIGN AND METHODS: We calculated the prevalence of inherited thrombophilic risk factors in a large cohort of patients (n=1,238) with different clinical manifestations of vein thromboembolism. In the present cohort, screening for inherited thrombophilia was worthwhile among patients who developed vein thrombosis of the leg or cerebral vein thrombosis. Carriers of FV Leiden or FII A(20210) mutation more frequently had had deep vein thrombosis of the leg (OR: 4.35; 95% CI: 3.39-5.60), superficial vein thrombosis (OR: 3.34; 95% CI: 2.06-5.41), or cerebral vein thrombosis (OR: 2.77; 95% CI: 1.10-6.96). RESULTS: The screening program appeared to have a limited relevance in patients with isolated pulmonary embolism (OR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.28-3.54), or mesenteric vein thrombosis (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.22-3.44). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The lack of association with inherited thrombophilia does not justify routine screening of patients with thrombosis of the upper extremities or with retinal vein thrombosis.     

Clinical aspects and laboratory problems in hereditary thrombophilia

Hereditary thrombophilia is a multifactorial disease which is mono- or plurigenic and its clinical expression is associated with a heterogeneous expression. Factor V (FV) Leiden and FII gene mutations are more frequent than antithrombin, and protein C and S deficiencies. All thrombophilias are not the same. Heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden or FII gene mutation have a weaker risk of venous thrombosis. The mean age at the first episode is older in the former and higher rate of recurrences is observed in the latter. The cosegregation of mutations significantly increases the risk of thrombosis. Both mutations have a geographic and ethnic distribution in relation with a gene founder effect. Clinical expression consists of deep or superficial venous thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism, thromboses at unusual sites (e.g. cerebral, portal, mesenteric) or with an increased incidence of fetal loss and abortion. A precipitating cause is present in more than 50% of patients. The risk pf arterial thromboses seems to be restricted to some protein S and FII gene mutations. Laboratory diagnosis strategy should be oriented by careful selection of patients and preanalytical variables should be considered. It is highly probable that other unindentified gene mutations are, at least partly, other causes of the heterogeneous expression of hereditary thrombophilia.     

Risk of venous thrombosis in carriers of the prothrombin G20210A variant and factor V Leiden and their interaction with oral contraceptives

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prothrombin G20210A mutation and factor V Leiden have been found to be associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis, but the reported prevalences of the prothrombin gene variant both in the normal population and in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) vary greatly in the literature. Moreover, the influence of oral contraceptives (OC) on thrombotic events in patients with the prothrombin G20210A variant has not been well established. In this study we evaluate both circumstances. DESIGN AND METHODS: A case-control study was run on 229 patients with DVT and 246 healthy controls. The patients' history of thrombosis and acquired thrombotic risk factors, especially OC, were recorded. Prothrombin G20210A mutation, factor V Leiden, antithrombin, heparin II cofactor, plasminogen and proteins C and S were evaluated. RESULTS: Seven and a half percent of the patients and 2.9% of the controls were carriers of the prothrombin mutation, while 12.2% of the patients and 1.6% of the controls had factor V Leiden. Among the 229 DVT patients there were 130 patients with clinically suspected thrombophilia (first thrombotic event occurring before the age of 45 years or positive family history of thrombosis or recurrent venous thrombosis). Ten percent of these 130 patients were carriers of the prothrombin G20210A mutation and 18.5% had the factor V Leiden mutation. The odds ratios (OR) for DVT risk were: 2.4 (95% CI, 1.0-6.3) for the total DVT patients and 5.2 (95% CI, 1.4-19.5) for the patients with clinically suspected thrombophilia with the prothrombin mutation. The risk of thrombosis was 6.9 (95% CI, 2.3-20.6) for the DVT patients and 14.3 (95% CI, 3.3-64.6) for the patients with clinically suspected thrombophilia with factor V Leiden. Fifty-five percent of the patients with combined congenital defects (prothrombin mutation G20210A plus another congenital defect) had recurrent thrombosis. In women receiving OC the risk of DVT was 3.5 (95% CI, 1.5-8.2) that of the patients not receiving OC. When women with combined defects were also taking OC, the risk of thrombosis increased significantly. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A mutation in the healthy population in our study is similar to that observed in other southern European countries. The prothrombin G20210A mutation does not by itself seem to be a high thrombotic risk factor. However, when it is present together with other thrombotic risk factors, the predicted risk of thrombotic events increases. The use of OC by women with the prothrombin G20210A variant or FV Leiden, either alone or combined with other thrombotic risk factors, was associated with a significant increase in the risk of venous thrombosis.     

The frequency of factor V Leiden and concomitance of factor V Leiden with prothrombin G20210A mutation and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T gene mutation in healthy population of Denizli, Aegean region of Turkey.

Factor V Leiden causing activated protein C resistance is the most common inherited form of thrombophilia leading to thrombosis. Its frequency shows great ethnic and geographic variations. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of FV Leiden and coinheritance of FV Leiden with two other frequent hereditary thrombophilia causes, namely, prothrombin G20210A and methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutation in the Aegean region of Turkey. The study population consisted of 1030 (500 men and 530 women) apparently healthy subjects. Functional resistance to activated protein C (APC) was measured by using the test kit STA staclot APC-R ((Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres, France, Cat. No. 00721). In subjects with APC resistance, molecular analyses of FV Leiden and of prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutation were performed by using FV-PTH-MTHFR StripA (Vienna Lab, Labordiagnostika GmbH, Austria) kit, which was based on hybridization of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified DNA products with mutation-specific oligonucleotide probes. Functional APC resistance was present in 93 subjects (9%). FV Leiden mutation was found in 87 of 93 subjects with APC resistance by PCR method. The FV Leiden carrier frequency was found to be 8.4% (87/1030). Seventy-six individuals were heterozygous (7.3%), and 11 were homozygous (1.06%). Among the 87 subjects with FV Leiden mutation, 45 subjects had MTHFR C677T gene mutation (7 homozygous, 38 heterozygous) and 4 subjects had heterozygote prothrombin G20210A gene mutation. A combination of FV Leiden and prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T gene mutation was detected in 3 subjects. The results indicate that FV Leiden prevalence is quite high and coexistence of FV Leiden with other hereditary causes of thrombosis such as prothrombin G20210A mutation and MTHFR enzyme defect is not rare in healthy population of Aegean region of Turkey.     

Portal-splenic-mesenteric venous thrombosis secondary to a mutation of the prothrombin gene

Thrombosis of the portal-mesenteric axis is an infrequent cause of intestinal ischemia or infarction. In addition to the multiple acquired factors that contribute to the development of this entity, hereditary risk factors, especially the factor V Leiden mutation and the G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene, have been implicated. The G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene is found in up to 40% of patients with splenic-portal-mesenteric thrombosis. The present case illustrates the unusual and nonspecific presentation of this mutation in the form of diarrhea and images of thrombosis of the superior mesenteric-portal vein and cavernous transformation of the portal vein. Delayed diagnosis is highly frequent since the clinical signs, laboratory investigations and radiological tests do not suggest the diagnosis. The patient received anticoagulant treatment and showed clinical improvement with complete portal-mesenteric recanalization. Currently the diagnostic technique of choice is magnetic resonance angiography or computerized tomography angiography and treatment consists of indefinite anticoagulation. This case illustrates that an unusual or atypical localization of venous thrombosis may be a manifestation of thrombophilia, emphasizing the importance of genetic screening in these cases.     

The investigation and management of inherited thrombophilia

Inherited thrombophilia can be defined as a genetically determined tendency to venous thromboembolism. Genetic risk factors for venous thrombosis include antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, activated protein C resistance due to the factor V gene Leiden mutation, inherited hyperhomocysteinaemia, elevated factor VIII levels and the prothrombin gene G20210 A variant. A genetic risk factor is now identifiable in up to 50% of unselected patients with venous thrombosis. Individuals with inherited thrombophilia may develop venous thrombosis at a young age, or they may present with thrombosis at an unusual site or in the apparent absence of any precipitating event. A family history of thrombosis is suggestive of inherited thrombophilia. Laboratory investigations for inherited thrombophilia should include testing for activated protein C resistance and the factor V gene Leiden mutation, and screening for deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S. Screening for the prothrombin gene G20210 A variant, and measurement of plasma factor VIII and homocysteine levels should be considered in individual cases. In recent years the multifactorial nature of thrombophilia, both circumstantially and on a genetic level, has become increasingly apparent. Individuals with more than one inherited thrombophilia risk factor are particularly prone to thrombosis and their identification is a priority.     

Prothrombin G20210A gene mutation and further prothrombotic risk factors in childhood thrombophilia.

Risk factors for venous thrombosis in adults are the prothrombin G20210A and the factor V (FV) G1691A mutations and hereditary deficiencies of protein C, protein S and antithrombin. However, data are limited on the relevance of these risk factors for thrombosis in children and adolescents. We therefore investigated 261 patients aged 0 to 18 (median 5.7 years, 48% male) with venous thrombosis and controls (n=370) for the presence of prothrombotic risk factors including the prothrombin G20210A mutation. The following frequencies of hereditary risk factors (patients versus controls), odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), or results of Fisher's exact test, respectively, were found: prothrombin G20210A, 4.2% versus 1.1%, OR/CI 4.1/1.3 to 12.8; FV G1691A, 31.8% versus 4. 1%, OR/CI 11.0/6.2 to 19.7; protein C deficiency, 9.2% versus 0.8%, OR/CI 12.4/3.7 to 41.6, protein S deficiency, 5.7% versus 0.8%, OR/CI 7.5/2.1 to 26.0; antithrombin deficiency in 3.4% in the patients, but not in the controls, P=0.0003. The prothrombin mutation was combined with the heterozygous FV G1691A mutation (2. 3%) or protein C deficiency (0.3%) in the patients, but not in the controls (prothrombin and FV mutation, P=0.0048; prothrombin and protein C deficiency, not significant). The carrier frequencies and ORs of all hereditary risk factors showed a non-significant trend toward higher prevalences in patients suffering spontaneous thrombosis, compared with those with an additional underlying disease. In conclusion, the prothrombin G20210A and the FV G1691A mutation, deficiencies of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin are important risk factors for venous thrombosis during childhood and adolescence.     

Risk factors for thrombophilia in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction

Scant information exists on the role of thrombophilia in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO). We studied 65 patients with EHPVO, 500 with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs, and 700 healthy controls referred for thrombophilia screening, including the search for gain-of-function mutations in genes encoding coagulation factor V (factor V Leiden) and prothrombin (prothrombin G20210A); antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiency; and hyperhomocysteinemia. At least one abnormality in the thrombophilia screening was found in 40% of patients with either EHPVO or lower limb DVT and in 13% of controls, for odds ratios of 4.0 (95% CI, 2.3-7.0) and 4.4 (95% CI, 3.3-5.9), respectively. Statistically significant associations with EHPVO were observed for the prothrombin G20210A mutation (odds ratio, 8.1; 95% CI, 3.8-17.5) and the deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S taken together (odds ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1-18.0). The odds ratio for the prothrombin G20210A was approximately twice that for lower limb DVT. Patients with factor V Leiden had an odds ratio for EHPVO of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.1-6.4) and for lower limb DVT of 7.5 (95% CI, 4.4-13.0). The odds ratio for EHPVO in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia was 2.0 (95% CI, 0.9-4.9). At variance with lower limb DVT, oral contraceptive use was not associated with an increased risk of EHPVO. Myeloproliferative disorders were diagnosed in 35% of patients with EHPVO. In conclusion, the risk for EHPVO is increased in the presence of thrombophilia resulting from the prothrombin G20210A mutation and from the deficiencies of the naturally occurring anticoagulant proteins, but not from factor V Leiden.     

FV Leiden mutation and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in Serbian population

The absolute rate of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is approximately 5% per year. There is a lower rate of recurrence in provoked VTE, and higher in idiopathic one. So far, there is no consensus whether hereditary thrombophilia should be considered as a persistent risk factor, and whether it requires long-term anticoagulant therapy. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk of recurrent VTE in patients carrying FV Leiden mutation in Serbian population.In retrospective study (1994-2006), we have evaluated the risk of recurrent VTE in 56 patients who are carriers of FV Leiden mutation, in comparison to group consisting of 56 patients non-carriers of FV Leiden mutation. Patients with FII G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations, antiphospholipid antibodies, antithrombin III, protein C or protein S deficiency, malignancies and diabetes were excluded from the study.Recurrent VTE occurred in 44.6% of the patients, carriers of the FV Leiden mutations, vs. 26.7% in non-carriers group (P<0.05). The incidence rate was 3.7 and 2.2% per year, respectively. The estimated relative risk of recurrence for FV Leiden carriers was 1.67 (95% CI 0.99-2.81, P=0.049). The 60% of patients with mutation and only 13% without mutation develop rethrombosis during first year after discontinuance of therapy (P<0.01).In our study patients with symptomatic VTE who are carriers of the FV Leiden gene mutations have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than non-carriers. Our data suggest the importance of the FV Leiden mutation detection and the estimation of the clinical condition for successful secondary prophylaxis of VTE.     

Molecular analysis of factor V Leiden, factor V Hong Kong, factor II G20210A, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T, and A1298C mutations related to Turkish thrombosis patients.

Inherited gene disorders related to the hemostatic system have been documented as risk factors for thrombosis. The roles of factor V Hong Kong (FV Hong Kong), factor V Leiden (FV Leiden), factor II G20210A (FII G20210A), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, and MTHFR A1298C mutations in Turkish patients with thrombosis (270 patients) compared with healthy controls (114 subjects) were evaluated. Polymerase chain reaction-based restriction enzyme analysis was carried out to screen these mutations, and single-strand conformation analysis was established to identify variations using the primers selected for restriction enzyme analysis studies. As a result, a significant relationship was determined among FV Leiden, FII G20210A, and thrombosis. The FV Hong Kong mutation was observed in only 2 patients with pulmonary vein thrombosis who are FV Leiden/FV Hong Kong compound heterozygous for FV gene. MTHFR C677T and A1298C were equally distributed in the patient group compared with the control group. All named mutations were also identified with single-strand conformation analysis, but a new variant/polymorphism during studies was not found. Because some inherited abnormalities are associated with thromboembolic disorders, determining the mutations and gene-to-gene interactions in patients with thrombosis history has a great impact on diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.     

The prothrombin gene G20210A variant: prevalence in a U.K. anticoagulant clinic population

We have investigated the prevalence of a recently reported genetic variation in the prothrombin gene (G20210A) in patients with an objectively confirmed history of venous thrombosis. 12/219 patients (5.5%) were found to be heterozygous carriers of the 20210 A allele. The incidence of the 20210 A allele in a group of 164 healthy controls was 1.2% (allele frequency 0.61%, 95% CI 0.08–2.19). When patients with a known alternative hereditary risk factor for venous thrombosis (factor V Leiden mutation or deficiency of antithrombin, protein C or protein S) were excluded, the G20210A variant was found to increase the risk for venous thrombosis by approximately 5-fold (odds ratio 5.4, 95% CI 1.16–25.0). This prothrombin gene sequence variation adds further to the list of recognized genetic risk factors for thrombophilia.     

High prevalence of thrombophilic genotypes in patients with acute mesenteric vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVES: Mesenteric vein thrombosis is a rare but severe abdominal emergency, often requiring intestinal resection. New genetic prothrombotic defects such as factor V Leiden, the prothrombin transition G20210A, and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase TT677 genotype have been described in association with venous thrombosis. Our goal was to assess prevalence and clinical significance of genetic thrombophilia in mesenteric vein thrombosis. METHODS: Twelve patients with acute mesenteric vein thrombosis were compared with 431 healthy people from the same geographical area. The factor V Leiden, the prothrombin transition G20210A, and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase TT677 genotype were identified by polymerase chain reaction and restriction analysis. RESULTS: A thrombophilic genotype was present in 9 patients (75%): the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase TT677 genotype was present in 6 (50%), the factor V Leiden in 3 (25%), and the prothrombin transition G20210A in 3 (25%). Combined mutations were present in 4 (33%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The factor V Leiden, the prothrombin transition G20210A, and the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase TT677 genotype are important predisposing factors in the pathogenesis of mesenteric vein thrombosis. Their identification bears strong clinical implications for management of patients with mesenteric vein thrombosis.     

Paget-Schroetter syndrome associated with FV:Q506 and prothrombin 20210A--a case report.

Effort thrombosis of the axillary-subclavian vein (Paget-Schroetter syndrome) develops usually secondary to heavy arm exertion. An underlying chronic venous compressive anomaly at the thoracic outlet or intimal damage of the axillary vein following forceful hyperabduction, external rotation of the shoulder joint has been proposed to explain the pathophysiology of this thrombosis. This condition is usually not attributed to an underlying hypercoagulability such as deficiency of natural coagulation inhibitors. Here, the authors present a case with thrombosis of the axillary-subclavian vein following an effort, with factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A mutations. Both factor V Leiden and the genetic variant in the prothrombin gene have been shown to confer an increased risk for venous thrombosis. Although rare, effort thrombosis may develop in a patient with hereditary thrombophilia, so laboratory evaluation should include the common causes of thrombosis.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation and other hereditary thrombophilic factors in Egyptian children with portal vein thrombosis: results of a single-center case-control study

No identifiable cause can be found in more than half of the cases of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Our aim was to assess the prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation and other thrombophilic factors as risk factors in the development of PVT in the pediatric age group. From March 2001 to January 2002, 40 children with PVT were enrolled in the study, in addition to 20 age-matched and sex-matched controls. Protein C, protein S, antithrombin III, and activated protein C resistance (APCR) were assayed. Molecular study of factor II and factor V mutations was carried out. Of the patients, 25 had detectable hereditary thrombophilia (62.5%), 12 had factor V Leiden mutation (30%), 11 had protein C deficiency (27.5%), 6 had factor II mutation (15%), 1 had antithrombin III deficiency (2.5%), and none had protein S deficiency. Five children had concurrence of more than one defect. Factor V Leiden mutation is the most common hereditary thrombophilia associated with PVT and the relative risk of factor V Leiden mutation, as a cause of PVT, was six times more than in controls (odds ratio=6). Concurrence of more than one hereditary thrombophilic factor was seen in 12.5% of our patients. Circumstantial risk factors (neonatal sepsis, umbilical sepsis, umbilical catheterization) were not more significantly prevalent among patients with hereditary thrombophilia than among those with no detectable abnormalities in anticoagulation.An erratum to this article can be found at     

Different circumstances of the first venous thromboembolism among younger or older heterozygous carriers of the G20210A polymorphism in the prothrombin gene

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The G20210A polymorphism in the prothrombin gene is a common cause of inherited thrombophilia. Scarce information is available about the circumstances of the heralding thrombotic manifestation at different ages. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of spontaneous or secondary venous thromboembolism (VTE) among younger and older carriers of the G20210A prothrombin polymorphism. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a case-control study, investigating 650 patients with a first objectively documented deep venous thrombosis of the legs or pulmonary embolism and 703 individuals with no history of vascular disease. In all of them we carried out laboratory screening for antithrombin III, protein C and protein S deficiencies, and for the presence of the factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin polymorphisms. RESULTS. After adjustment for other inherited causes of thrombophilia (deficiency of antithrombin III, protein C or S, factor V Leiden) the overall risk for VTE associated with the prothrombin polymorphism was 3.4 times higher than in the controls (95% CI, 2.0 to 5.8). Stratification according to the age and to the circumstances of the first event revealed an increased risk of spontaneous VTE only among the patients older than 45 years in comparison with age-matched controls (odds ratio 4.4, 95% CI 1.8 to 10.6); among the younger individuals the risk was increased for secondary VTE (odds ratio 4.8, 95% CI, 2.3 to 9.8) but not for spontaneous VTE. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The clinical penetrance of the thrombotic tendency associated with the G20210A prothrombin polymorphism is more expressed in the presence of a circumstantial risk factor (oral contraceptives, pregnancy, surgery, trauma) and in the presence of older age, which acts as an additional circumstantial risk factor. Accordingly, such situations should not discourage from carrying out laboratory screening.     

Direct oral anticoagulant use in patients with thrombophilia,antiphospholipid syndrome or venous thrombosis of unusual sites: A narrative review

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the use of DOACs in unusual VTE, including cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and splanchnic venous thrombosis (SVT), and in patients with biological thrombophilia including minor thrombophilia (Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A), major innate thrombophilia (protein C and S deficiency, and antithrombin) and major acquired thrombophilia (antiphospholipid syndrome [APS]), remains controversial due to the paucity of available data. There are some reports of DOACs use in the initial treatment or long-term maintenance of patients with either CVT or SVT, but their efficacy remains unclear. The efficacy of DOACs may be suitable in patients with biological minor or major thrombophilia. The use of DOACs for the long-term maintenance of patients with APS is more contentious. Randomized clinical trials, which are currently underway, should offer definitive insight into the efficacy and safety profiles of DOACs in these patient populations.     

Genetic risk factors of thrombosis

Genetic risk factors became a frequent predisposing cause of venous thromboembolism (VTE) since the discovery of two mutations: factor V Leiden and G20210A mutation of prothrombin gene. One of these both mutations is associated with around 25% of VTE events. Interaction of genetic risk factors, such as interaction of FV Leiden or G20210A mutation of prothrombin with antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiencies, as well as interaction with acquired risk factors, have demonstrated that venous thrombosis is a multifactorial disease. The search for thrombophilia must be done in VTE occurring before the age of 45, in case of recurrencies and in case of familial history of VTE.     

PAI-1 gene 4G/5G genotype: A risk factor for thrombosis in vessels of internal organs

Although the common 4G/5G polymorphism in the promoter of the PAI-1 gene was suggested to be a risk factor for some of the thrombotic disorders, its significance in the development of thrombosis is still controversial. This study presents the data on a total of 357 patients with different types of thrombosis and 281 unrelated healthy controls. It was found that the 4G/4G genotype is associated with a higher risk of thrombosis (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5). Patients were divided into five distinct groups according to the site of thrombosis. Both 4G/4G and 4G/5G genotypes were associated with a higher risk of thrombosis development in a group of 69 patients with internal organ thrombosis (OR, 6.35; 95% CI, 2.5-16.1 and OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 2.0-12.1, respectively). Interestingly, this association was even stronger in a subgroup of 33 patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and 4G/4G and 4G/5G genotypes conferred more than 10- and 6-fold increases in the risk of developing PVT (95% CI: 2.3-47.1 and 1.4-28.8), respectively. No statistically significant association was found between 4G/4G genotype and the groups of deep vein thrombosis (126 patients), cerebral thrombosis (80 patients), retinal thrombosis (72 patients), and purpura fulminans (16 patients). Factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations did not emerge as additional risk factors for thrombosis in any of the groups studied. To conclude, this study suggests that there may be an association between 4G/4G and 4G/5G genotypes and the thrombosis in vessels of internal organs especially in the portal veins.     

The impact of heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden and factor II G20210A mutations on the risk of thrombosis in Greek patients.

AIM: There is growing evidence that a number of genetic risk factors predispose independently to venous thrombosis and the coexistence of defective genes is involved in the manifestation and recurrence of thrombotic events. The goal of this study was to examine the efficiency of the selection criteria for performing a genetic test for the factor V G1691A (Leiden) and factor II G20210A mutations. METHODS: Blood samples were drawn from 119 patients referred to us by their physicians. FV and prothrombin (FII) mutations were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by digestion with restriction endonucleases MnlI (FV), HindIII and MspI (FII). RESULTS: Patient carrier frequencies were 16.8% and 10.08% for FV Leiden and FII G20210A, respectively. Heterozygosity for FII G20210A was observed in 10.0% of FV Leiden carriers whereas FV Leiden homozygosity was noted in 1.68% of the patients. Genotype frequencies were in conformity with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by the chi square goodness of fit test. CONCLUSION: The obtained data provided a substantial genetic explanation of the thrombotic phenotype in approximately 25% of the patients and thus the physicians selection criteria were sufficient for genetic testing. Furthermore, coinheritance of both genetic defects were significantly associated with increased thrombosis risk and that of recurrent thrombosis.