The time course of the oculogyral illusion and displacement of the subjective midline after self-rotation

We examined the time course of the apparent motion and displacement of the oculogyral illusion (OGI) after cessation of constant rotation (72 deg/s) as a vestibular stimulation. Subjects scaled the apparent motion of a target presented on the objective midline for 120 s after vestibular stimulation (Experiment 1) and the apparent displacement of the same target from the subjective midline (Experiment 2). The magnitude of apparent motion simply decreased from the maximum value as a function of time. In contrast, the magnitude of displacement was nearly zero, or localized near the subjective midline, immediately after the vestibular stimulation. Then, it increased rapidly in the direction of the acceleration, and decreased gradually moreover after 20 to 30 s. These findings suggest that the apparent motion and displacement in OGI could be controlled by different mechanisms, which have different response characteristics to the same vestibular stimulation.     

Different localization of motion onset with pointing and relative judgements

When observers are asked to judge the first position of a moving object, displacements of the judged onset in the direction of and in the direction opposite to the motion have been reported. These errors have been referred to as the Fröhlich illusion and the onset repulsion effect, respectively. To resolve the apparent contradiction between these results, a number of experimental parameters were investigated. Displacement in the direction opposite to motion was only observed when observers pointed to the onset of a slowly moving target. At higher velocities, no displacement with pointing was observed. In contrast, relative judgements of motion onset were accurate at slow velocities, but displaced in the direction of motion at fast velocities. Whether the target moved on a linear or circular trajectory did not alter the results. In one experiment, a dissociation between perceptual and memory-based judgements was found. Overall, the experimental task determined whether displacement in the direction of or in the direction opposite to motion occurred.     

Adaptation of a bimodal integration stage: visual input needed during neck muscle vibration to elicit a motion aftereffect

Vibratory stimulation of the neck muscles can elicit illusory drift of a visual target; after vibration stops, motion in the opposite direction is perceived. This motion aftereffect (MAE) could be due to adaptation of proprioceptive mechanisms that encode head orientation, or at a stage where visual and proprioceptive information are combined. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we applied vibratory stimulation to dorsolateral neck muscles for 15-s periods alternating with 15-s periods without vibration. Twenty-six observers used a hand-held tracker to indicate perceived motion of a stationary light-emitting diode (LED) in an otherwise dark room. In the critical condition, observers were in complete darkness during vibration, and the LED was only turned on in post-vibration periods. If adaptation was purely proprioceptive, a visual MAE should have occurred in this condition, but it did not. In a follow-up experiment (N = 9), the LED was presented intermittently to determine if there was a position aftereffect that might have been inhibited by processes signalling an absence of motion. No aftereffect occurred under these conditions either. In both experiments, a visual stimulus had to be present during the adaptation period in order to elicit an aftereffect. Results from our previous study ruled out an explanation based on suppression of eye movements. Thus, the most likely site responsible for the visual aftereffect lies with bimodal mechanisms combining proprioceptive and visual information. We conclude that the bimodal mechanisms adapted more quickly than the proprioceptive mechanisms from which they received input.     

Eye movement and visual motion perception in schizophrenia I: Apparent motion evoked smooth pursuit eye movement reveals a hidden dysfunction in smooth pursuit eye movement in schizophrenia

To date, smooth pursuit eye movement in schizophrenia has only been investigated using a target stimulus in continuous motion. However, smooth pursuit can also be evoked by an oscillating jumping dot that appears to be in apparent motion and although there is no continuous motion on the retinal surface this apparently moving stimulus can effortlessly elicit smooth-pursuit eye movement. In the first of two experiments smooth pursuit eye movement was evoked by target stimuli in continuous (real) motion at seven target velocities from 5.0 to 35.0 deg/s, and in a second experiment it was measured in response to an oscillating jumping dot in apparent motion at eight target velocities from 5.0 to 25.0 deg/s in a group with mixed-symptoms in schizophrenia and in a control group. The results of Experiment 1 provided no evidence for a dysfunction in continuous motion evoked smooth pursuit eye movement in the group with schizophrenia. However, following the removal of saccadic eye movements in smooth pursuit, the group with schizophrenia showed significantly lower smooth pursuit eye velocity at target velocities from 20.0 to 35.0 deg/s. The results of Experiment 2 revealed that apparent motion evoked smooth pursuit eye velocity in the group with schizophrenia was significantly lower in comparison with normal observers at all target velocities up to 25.0 deg/s with the inclusion or exclusion of saccadic eye movements. The findings demonstrate that overall smooth pursuit eye movement evoked in response to a continuous (real) motion target in the group with schizophrenia may nevertheless contain a hidden temporal resolution and integration dysfunction that is revealed when smooth pursuit eye movement is evoked in response to an oscillating jumping dot in apparent motion. The findings also demonstrate that normal smooth pursuit eye movement in normal observers can be made to resemble the dysfunctional smooth pursuit eye movement that is naturally found in some people with schizophrenia by using a target stimulus in apparent motion.     

Eye movements cannot explain vibration-induced visual motion and motion aftereffect

Eye movements are thought to account for a number of visual motion illusions involving stationary objects presented against a featureless background or apparent motion of the whole visual field. We tested two different versions of the eye movement account: (a) the retinal slip explanation and (b) the nystagmus-suppression explanation, in particular their ability to account for visual motion experienced during vibration of the neck muscles, and for the visual motion aftereffect following vibration. We vibrated the neck (ventral sternocleidomastoid muscles, bilaterally, or right dorsal muscles) and measured eye movements in conjunction with perceived illusory displacement of an LED presented in complete darkness (N=10). To test the retinal-slip explanation, we compared the direction of slow eye movements to the direction of illusory motion of the visual target. To test the suppression explanation, we estimated the direction of suppressed slow-phase eye movements and compared it to the direction of illusory motion. Two main findings show that neither actual nor suppressed eye movements cause the illusory motion and motion aftereffect. Firstly, eye movements do not reverse direction when the illusory motion reverses after vibration stops. Secondly, there are large individual differences with regards to the direction of eye movements in observers who all experience a similar visual illusion. We conclude that, rather than eye movements, a more global spatial constancy mechanism that takes into account head movement is responsible for the illusion. The results also argue against the notion of a single central signal that determines both perceptual experience and oculomotor behaviour.     

Human gaze shifts in which head and eyes are not initially aligned

Most studies of rapid orienting gaze shifts generated by combined eye and head movements have focused on an experimental condition in which gaze displacements are started with the subject's eyes in the normal straight-ahead position in the orbit. Such an experimental approach does not permit a clear identification of the input signal to the head motor system, because target offset angle is the same for both the eye and head. We have studied gaze shifts in human subjects which began with the visual axis straight ahead relative to the body (i.e., gaze or line of sight aligned with body sagittal plane) and with head offset from straight ahead at various angular positions. In our experimental conditions, the amplitude of head movement during a gaze shift was nearly equal to the angular distance between the target position and the starting head position (target-re-head), even though subjects were not specifically instructed to move their heads. This observation contrasts with other published reports in the literature showing considerable varibility amongst subjects in the amplitude of head rotation within a given task and between tasks. The difference may be related to the initial conditions which required subjects to align the eye and head on specific starting targets, since others have shown that requiring head alignment enhances head displacement. The amplitude of the saccadic eye movement was not determined by either the target's position relative to the starting eye or head positions. The value that best described the eye movement amplitude was the eye position in the orbit at the end of the saccade. This was nearly equal to target-rehead until a saturation eye position in the orbit was attained.     

Constancy of target velocity as a critical factor in the emergence of auditory and visual representational momentum

Representational momentum refers to the tendency to displace the judged final position of a moving auditory or visual target as being too far forward along the path of motion. This phenomenon was investigated here by comparing apparent displacements in final position with constant or with irregularly varying target velocities. Final positions of auditory or visual targets, moving along the horizontal plane, were indicated by manual pointing. In both modalities, we found a significantly smaller displacement magnitude with varying velocities compared to constant velocity. The reduction in displacement occurred irrespective of whether or not the participants pursued the visual targets with their eyes. These findings indicate that the emergence of representational momentum critically depends on the constancy of target velocity. The results are compatible with a model in which changes in the motion signal can override the extrapolation mechanism that usually causes the forward displacement of representational momentum.     

Apparent motion during saccadic suppression periods

Sensitivity to many visual stimuli, and, in particular, image displacement, is reduced during a change in fixation (saccade) compared to when the eye is still. In these experiments, we studied the sensitivity of observers to ecologically relevant image translations of large, complex, real world scenes either during horizontal saccades or during fixation. In the first experiment, we found that such displacements were much less detectable during saccades than during fixation. Qualitatively, even when trans-saccadic scene changes were detectible, they were less salient and appeared slower than equivalent changes in the absence of a saccade. Two further experiments followed up on this observation and estimated the perceived magnitude of trans-saccadic apparent motion using a two-interval forced-choice procedure (Experiment 2) and a magnitude estimation procedure (Experiment 3). Both experiments suggest that trans-saccadic displacements were perceived as smaller than equivalent inter-saccadic displacements. We conclude that during saccades, the magnitude of the apparent motion signal is attenuated as well as its detectability.     

Egocentric and allocentric localization during induced motion

This research examined motor measures of the apparent egocentric location and perceptual measures of the apparent allocentric location of a target that was being seen to undergo induced motion (IM). In Experiments 1 and 3, subjects fixated a stationary dot (IM target) while a rectangular surround stimulus (inducing stimulus) oscillated horizontally. The inducing stimulus motion caused the IM target to appear to move in the opposite direction. In Experiment 1, two dots (flashed targets) were flashed above and below the IM target when the surround had reached its leftmost or rightmost displacement from the subject’s midline. Subjects pointed open-loop at either the apparent egocentric location of the IM target or at the bottom of the two flashed targets. On separate trials, subjects made judgments of the Vernier alignment of the IM target with the flashed targets at the endpoints of the surround’s oscillation. The pointing responses were displaced in the direction of the previously seen IM for the IM target and to a lesser degree for the bottom flashed target. However, the allocentric Vernier judgments demonstrated no perceptual displacement of the IM target relative to the flashed targets. Thus, IM results in a dissociation of egocentric location measures from allocentric location measures. In Experiment 2, pointing and Vernier measures were obtained with stationary horizontally displaced surrounds and there was no dissociation of egocentric location measures from allocentric location measures. These results indicate that the Roelofs effect did not produce the pattern of results in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, pointing and Vernier measures were obtained when the surround was at the midpoint of an oscillation. In this case, egocentric pointing responses were displaced in the direction of surround motion (opposite IM) for the IM target and to a greater degree for the bottom flashed target. However, there was no apparent displacement of the IM target relative to the flashed targets in the allocentric Vernier judgments. Therefore, in Experiment 3 egocentric location measures were again dissociated from allocentric location measures. The results of this experiment also demonstrate that IM does not generate an allocentric displacement illusion analogous to the “flash-lag” effect.

Visual versus motor vector inversions in the antisaccade task: a behavioral investigation with saccadic adaptation

In the antisaccade task, subjects must execute an eye movement away from a visual target. Correctly executing an antisaccade requires inhibiting a prosaccade toward the visual target and programming a movement to the opposite side. This movement could be based on the inversion of the visual vector, corresponding to the distance between the fixation point and the visual target, or the motor vector of the unwanted prosaccade. We dissociated the two vectors by means of saccadic adaptation. Adaptation can be observed when systematic targeting errors are caused by the displacement of the visual target during the saccade. Adaptation progressively modifies saccade amplitude (defined by the motor vector) such that it becomes appropriate to the postsaccadic stimulus position and thus different from the visual vector of the target. If antisaccade preparation depended on visual vector inversion, rightward prosaccade adaptation should not transfer to leftward antisaccades (which are based on the same visual vector) but should transfer to rightward antisaccades (which are based on a visual vector inside the adaptation field). If antisaccade preparation depended on motor vector inversion, rightward prosaccade adaptation should transfer to leftward antisaccades (which are based on the same, adapted motor vector) but should not transfer to rightward antisaccades (which are based on a nonadapted motor vector). The results are in line with the first hypothesis, showing that vector inversion precedes saccadic adaptation and suggesting that antisaccade preparation depends on the inversion of the visual target vector.     

Updating visual space during passive and voluntary head-in-space movements

The accuracy of our spatially oriented behaviors largely depends on the precision of monitoring the change in body position with respect to space during self-motion. We investigated observers’ capacity to determine, before and after head rotations about the yaw axis, the position of a memorized earth-fixed visual target positioned 21° laterally. The subjects (n=6) showed small errors (mean=–0.6°) and little variability (mean=0.9°) in determining the position of an extinguished visual-target position when the head (and gaze) remained in a straight-ahead position. This accuracy was preserved when subjects voluntary rotated the head by various magnitudes in the direction of the memorized visual target (head rotations ranged between 5° and 60°). However, when the chair on which the subjects were seated was unexpectedly rotated about the yaw axis in the direction of the target (chair rotations ranged between 6° and 36°) during the head-on-trunk rotations, the performance was markedly decreased, both in terms of spatial precision (mean error=5.6°) and variability (mean=5.7°). A control experiment showed that the prior knowledge of chair rotation occurrence had no effect on the perceived target position after head-trunk movements. Updating an earth-fixed target position during head-on-trunk rotations could be achieved through both cervical and vestibular signals processing, but, in the present experiment, the vestibular output was the only signal that had the potentiality to contribute to accurate coding of the target position after simultaneous head and trunk movements. Our results therefore suggest that the vestibular output is a noisy signal for the central nervous signal to update the visual space during head-in-space motion. Received: 2 June 1997 / Accepted: 16 March 1998     

Plantar stimulation can affect subjective straight-ahead in neglect patients

The rightward orientation bias of neglect patients has been shown to be decreased by postural changes, suggesting that afferences coding the posture relative to gravity might influence the body-centred spatial reference frame. In order to test this hypothesis, we evaluated the effects of plantar stimulations on the subjective straight-ahead (SSA) of two neglect patients presenting with a strong rightward shift, as well as two non-neglect patients and three normal subjects. Vibratory or electrical stimulations were applied to the left or right plantar sole. Data showed that these manipulations influenced the SSA position in neglect patients only. The observed improvement could be explained by a direction-specific effect of vibration, in addition to a non-specific activation induced by both stimulations.     

Reach adaptation to explicit vs. implicit target error

The adaptation of reaching movements has typically been investigated by either distorting visual feedback of the reaching limb or by distorting the forces acting upon the reaching limb. Here, we investigate reach adaptation when error is created by systematically perturbing the target of the reach rather than the limb itself (Magescas and Prablanc in J Cogn Neurosci 18: 75–83, 2006). Specifically, we investigate how adaptation is affected by (1) the timing of the perturbation with respect to the movement of the eye and the hand and (2) participant awareness of the perturbation. In Experiment 1, participants looked and pointed to a target that disappeared either at the onset of their eye movement or shortly after their eye movement and then reappeared, displaced to the right, at the completion of the reach. In Experiment 2, we made the target displacement more explicit by leaving the target at its initial location until the end of the reach, at which point it was displaced to the right. In Experiment 3, we extinguished the target at the onset of the eye movement but also informed participants about the presence and magnitude of the perturbation. In the no-feedback post-test phase, participants for whom the target disappeared during the reach demonstrated much stronger aftereffects of the perturbation, misreaching to the right, whereas participants for whom the target stayed on until reach completion demonstrated rapid extinction of rightward misreaching. Furthermore, participants who were informed about the target perturbation exhibited faster de-adaptation than those who were not. Our results suggest that adaptation to a target displacement is contingent on the explicitness of the target perturbation, whether this is achieved by manipulating stimulus timing or instruction.     

Eye movement and visual motion perception in schizophrenia II: global coherent motion as a function of target velocity and stimulus density

Coherent global motion is a compelling illusion of visual motion that is seen as the result of spatially and successively presented stimuli that are, in fact, stationary. In the present study the threshold perception of global coherent motion was measured using random-dot kinematograms in a group of normal observers and a group with mixed symptoms in schizophrenia who also participated in a companion study on smooth pursuit eye movement (Slaghuis et al. in Exp Brain Res, 2007). The velocity of coherent motion target stimuli was produced by varying the spatial step-size (Δs) between dots to create three target velocities (6.0, 12.0 and 24.0 deg/s) which were measured at three target stimulus densities (100, 200, and 400 dots/deg²). A staircase procedure was used to determine the threshold for the number of target dots that was needed to move in the same direction to detect the direction of motion and which were plotted amongst a field of randomly moving visual noise dots. The findings demonstrate that in comparison with normal observers, the threshold for the perception of coherent motion in the group with schizophrenia was significantly higher at the lowest target velocity of 6.0 deg/s but not at target velocities of 12.0 and 24.0 deg/s. Stimulus density was found to have a significant effect on the perception of coherent motion, but it had no differential effect on performance in the groups. An examination of relationships between coherent motion and smooth pursuit eye movement in the companion study (Slaghuis et al. in Exp Brain Res, 2007) revealed significant, negative, correlations between coherent motion and apparent motion smooth pursuit eye velocity at target velocities of 6.0, 12.0 and 24.0 deg/s in the group with schizophrenia, but no such relationship was found in normal observers. It was concluded that the significant reduction in sensitivity for the perception of coherent motion at the lowest target velocity of 6.0 deg/s in the group with schizophrenia is consistent with an impairment in the detection of visual motion at a local level and in parallel for all parts of the image at striate and extrastiate levels of visual processing.     

Examination of eye-movement related factors of representational momentum

The judged final position of a moving target that disappears is displaced forward (representational momentum: RM), a phenomenon called representational momentum (RM). Recently, Kerzel (2000) suggested that RM was elicited by SPEMs after a target's offset that moved the persisting image of the target in the direction of the motion after the target dissapeared. We examined RM for a target that was not pursued by eyes. In Experiment 1 the target and a small dot moved in the same or opposite direction. Participants were instructed to pursue the small dot and locate the final position of the target. In both conditions the target's motion on the retina was expected to be equal to each other. Although the Kerzel's hypothesis (2000) predicted negative RM for the target moving in the opposite direction of SPEMs, no consistent negative RM was observed. Results of Experiment 2 suggested that the individual strategy to use the small dot affected RM. Taken together, it was shown that Kerzel's lower-level model was not very successful in explaining RM, but instead data suggested that predictive mental extrapolation and a higher-order individual strategy were involved in the production of RM.     

Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision

Retinal ganglion cells were successfully labelled in the chameleon by retrograde axonal transport of dextran amines that were applied to the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) in an in vitro preparation. Labelled ganglion cells were restricted to the contralateral eye. Many cells were completely stained including their dendritic trees. With few exceptions, all cells had displaced somata that were located at the inner margin of the inner nuclear layer. The labelled ganglion cells had two to six primary dendrites that branched frequently and formed large unistratified dendritic trees within sublamina 1 of the inner plexiform layer. There was extensive overlap of the dendritic trees of neighbouring cells leading to an estimated coverage factor of 2–4. The dendritic field areas varied in size according to the retinal position of the cells and were highest in the central retina around the fovea with a maximum of 0.14 mm² and reached a second maximum at the retinal margin with values of 0.08–0.1 mm². The smallest dendritic areas (0.04–0.06 mm²) were measured midway between the fovea and retinal margin. The size of the soma area was not correlated to the dendritic field size and increased from 100 to 150 μm² near the fovea to 150–300 μm² at the retinal margin. There was no evidence for a retinotopic organisation of ganglion cell fibres within the nBOR. All cells were of uniform morphology that was identical to the type of nBOR-projecting displaced ganglion cell (DGC) described previously for the bird retina. Similar to birds, the labelled DGCs were the only source of retinal projection to the nBOR. A small fraction of cells had orthotopic somata located in the ganglion cell layer but were otherwise identical to the labelled DGCs. The similarity of chameleon nBOR-projecting ganglion cells to those described in avian retinas mirrors the close phylogenetic relationship of birds and lizards. Electronic Publication     

The perception of body orientation after neck-proprioceptive stimulation

Different sensory systems (e.g. proprioception and vision) have a combined influence on the perception of body orientation, but the timescale over which they can be integrated remains unknown. Here we examined how visual information and neck proprioception interact in perception of the "subjective straight ahead" (SSA), as a function of time since initial stimulation. In complete darkness, healthy subjects directed a laser spot to the point felt subjectively to be exactly straight ahead of the trunk. As previously observed, left neck muscle vibration led to a disparity between subjective perception and objective position of the body midline, with SSA misplaced to the left. We found that this displacement was sustained throughout 28 min of continuous proprioceptive stimulation, provided there was no visual input. Moreover, prolonged vibration of neck muscles leads to a continuing disparity between subjective and objective body orientation even after offset of the vibration; the longer the preceding vibration, the more persistent the illusory deviation of body orientation. To examine the role of vision, one group of subjects fixated a central visual target at the start of each block of continuous neck vibration, with SSA then measured at successive intervals in darkness. The illusory deviation of SSA was eliminated whenever visual input was provided, but returned as a linear function of time when visual information was eliminated. These results reveal: the persistent effects of neck proprioception on the SSA, both during and after vibration; the influence of vision; and integration between incoming proprioceptive information and working memory traces of visual information.     

Adaptive plasticity in the naso-occipital linear vestibulo-ocular reflex

 The linear vestibulo-ocular reflex (LVOR) during motion along the naso-occipital (NO) axis is governed by eye position and viewing distance. These influences are necessary for the LVOR to maintain stable foveal images during head translation. The response to NO translation must be large when eye position is eccentric from the axis of head motion (i.e., during lateral gaze) and must diminish as eye position approaches straight-ahead, eventually reaching zero when the eye is aligned with the NO axis of motion (the ”null point”). As eye position crosses to the opposite side, the LVOR response must reappear, but in the opposite direction, and must grow in magnitude as eccentricity increases. To determine whether the NO-LVOR is subject to adaptive plastic mechanisms, squirrel monkeys were conditioned during NO translation while they binocularly viewed a rich visual field through parallel base-right or base-left wedge prisms. This optical method effectively shifted the visual world 9° leftward or rightward, respectively, thus inducing a mismatch between vision and the NO-LVOR during head movements. To restore compensatory function, the relationship between LVOR sensitivity and horizontal eye position must shift by 9° in the same direction as the visual image shift, effectively shifting the null point. After 2 h of adaptive conditioning, all monkeys exhibited an adaptive shift in the appropriate direction by an average of 3.0° (range 0.7-5.0°), corresponding to 33% of the geometrically required adaptation. Received: 2 February 1998 / Accepted: 1 December 1998     

Representational momentum in spatial hearing does not depend on eye movements

The perceived final position of a moving object usually seems to be displaced in the direction of motion. This displacement effect, termed representational momentum, has been reported for both visual and acoustic targets. This study investigated whether representational momentum in the auditory modality depends on oculomotor behavior during target presentation. In a dark anechoic environment, subjects localized the final position of a horizontally moving acoustic target (continuous noise) by using a hand pointer. Subjects were instructed to pursue the acoustic target with their eyes, to maintain central gaze direction, or to fixate a central visual fixation point. Forward displacements of the perceived final target position occurred irrespective of the eye-movement condition. This result is not consistent with previous findings in the visual modality indicating a reduction of forward displacement for continuously moving targets with fixation. It is suggested that factors other than oculomotor behavior are the source of representational momentum in spatial hearing.     

Asymmetry of visuo-vestibular mechanisms contributes to reversal of optokinetic after-nystagmus

When the visual background is moving while subject fixate a visual target, optokinetic eye movements (OKN) are suppressed and the after response, called optokinetic after nystagmus (OKAN), occurring at the stimuli offset is often inverted as compared to the situation when the OKN movements are allowed. In this study, we investigated whether this reversal of OKAN results from a perceptual or extra-retinal feedback in relation with the pursuit system and/or the vestibular indirect system. Optokinesis performance was studied in normal subjects in four experiments always using the same background motion (1) to characterize the OKN and OKAN performance elicited by the whole visual field motion while fixating or not a central visual target, (2) to investigate the 3D characteristics of the OKAN reversal by using different orientations of the visual stimulation, (3) to correlate the occurrence of an inverted OKAN with functional asymmetry of the visuo-vestibular system, by studying the effects of ocular fixation deviations and finally (4) to examine the effects of the depth plane of gaze fixation on the OKAN characteristics. In Experiments 1 and 2, we observed that the visual fixation during full-field motion induced either a dumping effect or an inversion of the OKAN response that could occur in the different planes of eye movements. The time constant was significantly increased in the inverted after-responses as compared to the not inverted ones. In Experiment 3, we found that the occurrence of an OKAN reversal after eye movement inhibition was significantly related to the presence of right/left asymmetrical OKAN responses. Moreover, the OKAN time constant was strikingly dependent on the eye fixation position during the visual stimulation and this time constant/eye position relation diverged between OKAN responses with and without inversion. Finally, Experiment 4 showed that the OKAN inversion tended to disappear when the visual target to fixate was in the near space as compared to the far space included in the background. These results argue in favor of an extraretinal influence in relation to the dynamics of the vestibulo-motor system, rather than for a perceptual influence on the inverted OKAN mechanisms. More precisely, we postulate that the reversal of OKAN could be linked to an inhibition issued from pursuit signals combined with an asymmetrical activity in the VSM vestibular complex. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.