共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 88 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
我国眼科学术期刊学术水平与影响力分析 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
目的 进一步了解我国眼科学术期刊的整体水平和影响力.方法 采用文献计量学方法,依据2002至2007年版<中国学术期刊综合引证报告>(CAJCCR)的数据及<中国引文数据库>2001至2007年的数据,统计我国13种眼科杂志的影响因子(IF)、他引IF、总被引频次、被引文章篇数、即年指标、基金论文比、Web即年下载率、h指数均值,并计算出他引被引率、h2/n、高被引论文比均值等指标.同时统计分析它们被国内外重要核心期刊数据库收录情况.结果 13种眼科学术期刊2001至2006年IF均值、被引频次均值分别为0.3940和557,高于D辑(医药卫生类期刊)每刊平均值.IF、他引IF、总被引频次、他引被引率、即年指标、基金论文比、Web即年下载率、h指数、h2/n、高被引论文比等10种指标中5项指标以上进入前5位并被5种以上国内外重要数据库收录的期刊有:<中华眼科杂志>、<中华眼底病杂志>、<中国实用眼科杂志>、<眼视光学杂志>.<中华眼科杂志>大部分指标名列第一.结论 我国13种眼科学术期刊主要计量指标最高值与最低值相差悬殊,表明部分眼科学术类期刊质量有待提高. 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Jean-Paul Dray Nur Khati Eric Souie Peerooz Saee Guy Ben Simon Juliana Gildener-Leapman Ofira Zloto 《国际眼科》2022,15(11):1852-1856
AIM: To examine the publication trend of oculoplastic articles throughout the last decade in general ophthalmology journals.
METHODS: A review of all abstracts published between January 2010 to December 2019 in general, clinical ophthalmic journals was conducted. Articles that were categorized as original articles in general and clinical journals were included in the study.
RESULTS: Totally 10 281 abstracts were included. Of them 465 (4.5%) were oculoplastic publications. The mean number of annual-publications was 46.5 and the mean annual-rate of oculoplastic publications was 4.51%. A significant decreasing trend in the number of oculoplastic publication in the last decade was found (P<0.01, R2=0.770). However, there was no significant change in the annual-rate of oculoplastic publications during the last decade (P=0.191, R2=0.203). From the 465 oculoplastic articles: 179 (38.5%) were articles about eyelid diseases, 160 (34.40%) were about orbit diseases, 92 (19.80%) were about lacrimal diseases and 34 (7.30%) were about thyroid eye disease (TED). A significant decreasing trends in the number of orbital and eyelids publications were found (P<0.01, P<0.01). However, there were no significant changes in the annual-rate of orbital, eyelids, TED and lacrimal-diseases publications throughout the last decade.
CONCLUSION: Oculoplastic subspecialty deals with a wide range of pathologies in different ages. However, less than 5% of the articles in general, clinical, high impact factor ophthalmology journals are about oculoplastic diseases. One of the best way for ophthalmologists from different subspecilties, nowadays, to be updated, is to read high-impact-factor, general ophthalmology journals. Therefore, it is important that those journals will include articles about breakthroughs in oculoplastic. 相似文献
12.
自"视觉2020"行动发起已有10a余.尽管中国的文章总量在20强国家中排第五位,但各地区的文章分布尚不清楚.本文比较来自中国三个主要地区:大陆、香港和台湾在这10a内发表在国际期刊上的眼科文章情况.检索2000/2009年的PubMed数据库,分别对文章的数量,影响因子(IF)和顶级杂志发表文章数量进行比较.从2000/2009年,中国发表共计 2 493篇眼科相关文章,其中大陆1 076篇,台湾784篇,香港633篇.三个地区发表的文章数量随时间推移有所增加(从99到491).自2006年开始,大陆发表的文章总数超过了香港及台湾.大陆累计影响因子2 565.108分,高于台湾(1 794.049)和香港(1 544.021),但香港在平均影响因子分值方面最高.通过研究发现,近10a来大陆在SCI期刊发表文章的数量有很大的飞跃,并缩小了与台湾和香港之间的差距. 相似文献
13.
AIM: To explore the trends in the ophthalmic literature over a 5-year period in relation to country, research expenditure and demographics.
METHODS: Articles published between 2009 and 2013 by the 20highest-contributing countries in the 20 top-ranked ophthalmology journals were identified by their country of affiliation. The number of articles published and mean impact factor were measured per country for each year and trends explored using regression analysis with 5-year and 10-year forecasts calculated. Data on research expenditure was collected and tested for correlation with the number of articles and mean impact factor.
RESULTS: The analysis included 19 338 articles. The USA, UK and Europe accounted for 60.2% of articles published, with the USA contributing 7388 articles (34.0%). The USA also demonstrated the highest mean impact factor (3.5). Research expenditure was significantly correlated with both research output (r=0.86, P<0.001) and scholarly impact (r=0.42, P<0.001). China (P<0.01), Korea (P<0.01) and India (P<0.02) demonstrated a significant growth in research output over the study period. The research contribution of these three countries combined is forecasted to overtake that of Europe within ten years, with China expected to be the second-largest contributor within five years. These countries were also among those demonstrating the greatest growth in research expenditure.
CONCLUSION: While the USA and European countries are major contributors of ophthalmic research, the productivity of some Asian countries is growing impressively. The contribution of China, Korea and India is forecasted to outweigh that of Europe by 2023. Research expenditure is highly correlated with research productivity and these trends reflect the differing economic priorities across the world. 相似文献
14.
我国眼科专业期刊国际化发展概况 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
简要概括了科技期刊国际化发展的重要性和内涵,对我国15种眼科专业期刊在国际化发展方面进行综合分析,并以《国际眼科杂志》为例,肯定其在国际化发展方面取得的初步成果并找出差距,探讨今后国际化发展努力方向及有效措施,以便加速我国眼科专业期刊国际化、全球化发展。 相似文献
15.
目的 统计分析目前国内学者在SCI期刊发表的眼科领域系统评价和Meta分析论文情况,为今后发表此类研究提供参考。设计 描述性研究。研究对象 在PubMed、EMBASE及Cochrane library三大数据库中收录的所有眼科领域的系统评价和Meta分析论文。方法 系统检索PubMed、EMBASE及Cochrane library三大数据库。检索时,限定研究对象为人类,语言为英语,检索时间截止到2017年1月30日。通过阅读标题、摘要及全文,排除重复及不相关研究,将最终符合条件的研究按作者来源、发表年限、疾病类型等进行归类分析。主要指标 作者来源、发表年限、疾病类型。 结果 三大数据库共检索到10 551条题录(PubMed 4214,EMBASE 6155,Cochrane library 182)。排除重复及不相关研究后,最终符合条件的系统评价和Meta分析442篇。此类研究最早发表于2004年,按年发表量排名,前三名分别是:2015(100篇,22.62%)、2014(91篇,20.59%)、2016(90篇,20.36%)。共有来自52个城市的作者参与发表过此类研究,前三名城市分别是:上海(95篇,21.49%)、北京(45篇,10.18%)、广州(38篇,8.60%)。共有126种杂志发表此类研究,前三名杂志分别是:PLoS One (79篇,17.87%)、Molecular Vision(16篇,3.62%)、BMC Ophthalmology(15篇,3.39%)。研究内容以视网膜疾病最多,前三名疾病分别是:视网膜疾病(168篇,38.01%)、青光眼(95篇,21.49%)、屈光手术(47篇,10.63%)。定性系统评价17篇(3.85%),Meta分析425篇(96.15%)。在Meta分析中干预性研究177篇,观察性研究248篇,后者以基因相关研究(137篇)、危险因素(84篇)为主。结论 国内学者在眼科领域系统评价发表量逐年增多,作者主要集中于国内大城市,尤其是上海和北京,研究热点主要是视网膜疾病、青光眼,非干预性研究发表量已超越干预性研究,其中以基因相关研究及危险因素研究为主。 相似文献
16.
本文分析了中国智能眼科领域的现状、技术发展、学术交流平台、政策支持以及未来的挑战和解决方案。在技术方面,中国智能眼科在糖尿病视网膜病变、眼底图像分析等多个领域取得了显著进展,包括医学人工智能产品的质量评价、临床研究方法、技术评价和产业规范等方面。研究人员通过制定一系列临床应用指南和标准,不断提升智能眼科技术的安全性和规范水平。学术交流平台的建设为多领域专业人士提供了广泛合作的机会,同时各类学术期刊也为智能眼科研究提供了发表平台。在公共政策方面,中国政府通过一系列文件和法规为智能眼科的发展创造积极的政策环境的同时,也提供了法律依据和管理框架。然而,技术创新、数据隐私与安全、法规滞后、人才短缺等问题仍然是未来发展的挑战。为了应对这些问题,未来需要加强技术研发、法规制度建设、人才培养,并提高患者对新技术的认知和接受度。通过全面解决这些挑战,中国智能眼科有望在全球范围内更进一步引领该行业的发展,为眼科医疗领域带来更多创新和便利。 相似文献
17.
目的 探讨眼科门诊患者个性化健康教育的相关因素,为护士进行健康教育提供依据。制定相关的健康教育模式程序及相关的评价量表可供执行。方法 对眼科门诊就诊的390例患者进行个性化健康教育,并对健康教育的方式、方法、时机、时间等因素进行观察和效果评价。结果 个性化健康教育组教育质量优良率显著高于随机教育组(X^2=106.97/,P〈0.01)和计划性健康教育组(X^2=348.02,P〈0.01);治疗过程中进行健康教育的质量优良率显著低于其他时机(X^2=152.16,P〈0、01);患者对疾病知识的了解率在健康教育前后差异有非常显著性(t=45.146,P〈0.01)。结论 针对门诊患者的特点,制定并执行个性化健康教育对提高患者的疾病治疗、健康保健知识及对疾病的防治工作有重要意义。 相似文献
18.
纳米技术在眼科基础研究中的应用 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
纳米技术注重对纳米量级分子结构的分析和操纵,可实现对单个或数个生物活性分子的探测、修饰、运输、传导等,从而完成对生理病理现象的精确观察或调控。本文旨在综述纳米技术在眼科基础研究中的应用,主要是应用共聚焦显微镜观察结膜上皮细胞吞噬纳米颗粒的作用机制,应用原子力学显微镜精确观察角膜内皮表面图像,通过生物学长度尺度断层扫描研究天然基底膜的模型特征与上皮细胞生物学行为之间的关系,应用泪膜脂质层干涉相机从纳米水平分析泪膜干涉图像,研究纳米水平的神经交互作用、库夫勒环绕抑制、内网织层和视网膜信息处理单元的功能。 相似文献
19.
20.
Purpose: To identify the most published authors on the topics of ‘cataract’ and ‘LASIK’, the journals in which they publish, and the citation patterns of the most‐cited articles by these authors over a 5‐year publication period. Methods: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) was used to identify the 30 most‐published authors in ‘cataract’ and ‘laser in situ keratomileusis’ (LASIK) (2000–2004 inclusive). SCI was subsequently used to analyse the recorded articles for each author in terms of source journal, the most commonly cited articles and citation source. Results: Of the 30 most‐published authors in the fields of cataract and LASIK, the USA was the most well‐represented source country, accounting for 33%; 20% were from Australia, and 17% from Austria. Germany and Japan each contributed 7%. Eighty per cent of the publications produced by these 30 authors (2000–2004) were in 10 journals, of which the Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (JCRS) published more than one‐third. Of the three most‐cited articles for each author, the greatest number were published in JCRS (35.6%). The citation count of the articles had a weak correlation to the journal impact factor of the source journal; however, the self‐citation rate of these articles did not. Conclusions: The USA and Australia together were the source of more than half of the most‐published authors on cataract and LASIK and the majority of articles published by the 30 most prolific authors were published in only 10 journals. The impact factors of the publication journals preferred by these authors are influenced by the article citation counts, not vice versa. 相似文献