The Dilemma of Conditioning Intensity: When Does Myeloablative Conditioning Improve Outcomes for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The impact of conditioning intensity on different disease risk index (DRI) groups has not been evaluated. We retrospectively analyzed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients in 2 groups based on DRI, to assess the impact of conditioning intensity on overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM).A total of 380 patients with either high/very high (n?=?148) or low/intermediate DRI (n?=?232) myeloid malignancy (AML, n = 278; MDS, n?=?102) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up for survivors was 35 months. Median age was 58years (range, 18 to 75). Patient and transplant-related characteristics were 41% reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), 59% myeloablative conditioning (MAC), 13% bone marrow graft, 29% matched related donor, 49% matched unrelated donor, 22% haploidentical donor, and 52% HCT-specific comorbidity index ≥ 3. Among patients with high/very high DRI, there was no difference in OS, DFS, relapse, and NRM between RIC and MAC conditioning groups. For low/intermediate risk DRI recipients of MAC had better 3-year OS estimate (69% versus 57%, P?=?.001), DFS (65% versus 51%, P?=?.003), and lower relapse (3-year cumulative incidence, 17% versus 32%; P?=?.01) but similar NRM (19% versus 17%, P?=?.04) to RIC recipients. On multivariable analysis MAC was associated with better DFS (hazard ratio [HR], .58; 95% confidence interval [CI], .39-.88; P?=?.01), lower relapse (HR, .56; 95% CI, .32 to .97; P?=?.038), and similar NRM (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, .54 to 2.26; P?=?.781) compared with RIC in the low/intermediate DRI group. Intensity had no impact on HCT outcomes in the high/very high DRI group.MAC improves DFS and relapse compared with RIC among AML/MDS patients with low/intermediate DRI. The finding of no such benefit in high/very high DRI needs to be further explored in a larger cohort with a longer follow-up.     

HLA-Matched Sibling versus Unrelated versus Haploidentical Related Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients Aged Over 60 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Donor Comparison

Haploidentical related donor (HRD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was developed as a valid option for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the absence of a matched donor. However, many investigators are reluctant to consider the use of this alternative in elderly patients, anticipating high morbidity. Here, we report a single-center comparison of HRD versus matched sibling donor (MSD) and unrelated donor (UD) allo-HSCT for patients with AML aged ≥60 years. Ninety-four patients (MSD: n?=?31; UD: n?=?30; HRD: n?=?33) were analyzed. The median age was 65 (range, 60 to 73) years. We observed a higher cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after UD allo-HSCT (MSD versus UD versus HRD: 3% versus 33% versus 6%, respectively; P?=?.006). Two-year cumulative incidence of moderate or severe chronic GVHD was 17%, 27%, and 16% in the MSD, UD, and HRD groups, respectively (P?=?.487). No difference was observed in the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse or nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (relapse: MSD versus UD versus HRD: 32% versus 25% versus 25%, respectively; P?=?.411; NRM: MSD versus UD versus HRD: 19% versus 27% versus 24%, respectively; P?=?.709). At 2 years, progression-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD- and relapse-free survival were 48%, 50%, and 39%, respectively, in the MSD group; 48%, 51%, and 23%, respectively, in the UD group; and 50%, 52%, and 32%, respectively, in the HRD group, without statistically significant differences between the groups. We conclude that HRD allo-HSCT is highly feasible and no less efficient than MSD or UD allo-HSCT in patients with AML aged ≥60 years. Thus, the absence of a HLA-identical donor should not limit the consideration of allo-HSCT for the treatment of AML.     

The Role of Allogeneic Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Study from the Japanese Society of Myeloma

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered a potentially curative therapy for patients with multiple myeloma, the role of allo-HSCT remains unclear in the novel agent era. We conducted a retrospective study of 65 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent allo-HSCT at 19 institutions from 2009 to 2016. Patients received a median of 3 (range, 1 to 7) lines of prior therapy, including at least 1 novel agent, except for autologous HSCT. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6% to 30.3%) and 47.2% (95% CI, 33.9% to 59.4%), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, an age ≥50 years and less than a very good partial response (VGPR) before allo-HSCT were independent significant adverse factors for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30, P?=?.0063; HR, 2.86; P?=?.0059) and OS (HR, 2.37, P?=?.013; and HR, 2.74; P?=?.040). In contrast, the 3-year PFS and OS rates in patients <50 years of age who achieved a VGPR or better before allo-HSCT were 64.3% (95% CI, 29.8% to 85.1%) and 80.2% (95% CI, 40.3% to 94.8%), respectively. The overall response rate was 86.4% (95% CI, 75.0% to 94.0%). The proportion of VGPR or better increased from 29% before allo-HSCT to 71% after allo-HSCT. The nonrelapse mortality at 3 years was 23.4% (95% CI, 13.8% to 34.4%). Only an age ≥50 years was associated with higher nonrelapse mortality (HR, 4.71; P?=?.015). We showed that allo-HSCT is feasible for heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma, even in the novel agent era. Allo-HSCT in particular is a promising therapy for young and chemosensitive patients.     

Comparison between Upfront Transplantation and different Pretransplant Cytoreductive Treatment Approaches in Patients with High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Secondary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative treatment for patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML), but in the absence of prospective trials the impact of pretransplant cytoreduction is controversially discussed. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 165 patients with MDS and excess blasts (n = 126, 76%) and sAML (n = 39, 24%) according to a pretransplant strategy. Sixty-seven patients (41%) were directly transplanted (upfront group), whereas 98 patients (59%) had received pretransplant cytoreductive treatment (induction chemotherapy [CTX], n = 64; hypomethylating agents [HMAs], n = 34) resulting in a significantly higher complete remission rate in the CTX group (59% versus HMA 18%, P < .0001). Estimated rates of 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) for the entire group were 54% and 39%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of the upfront, CTX, and HMA groups were 61%, 50%, and 45%, respectively (P = .116), whereas RFS rates were 38%, 41%, and 38% (P = .926). Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) did not differ between treatment groups. In the upfront group no difference regarding OS and RFS was seen with respect to pretransplant blast count (>10% versus <10%). In multivariate analyses type of pretransplant strategy did not have an effect on OS, RFS, CIR, and NRM, whereas cytogenetics (OS, RFS, CIR), reduced-intensity conditioning (OS, RFS, CIR), and an unrelated donor (RFS, CIR) were identified as negative predictors. When compared with the upfront group, 5-year OS was significantly lower in patients with CTX-refractory disease (34% versus 64%, P = .0346) and by clear trend in HMA nonresponders (42% versus 61%, P = .073), whereas RFS did not differ significantly. In further support of the concept, that pretransplant therapy may favor the selection of resistant clones, patients in the upfront group had a higher likelihood to respond to HMAs as salvage therapy for relapse in comparison with pretreated patients (complete remission, 58% versus 10%; P = .0005) and a higher 2-year OS rate after relapse (59% versus 19%, P = .0001). These data suggest that an upfront transplant strategy is at least not inferior to pretransplant cytoreduction and may be augmented by HMAs + donor lymphocyte infusion salvage therapy in case of relapse after allo-HSCT.     

Sorafenib Therapy Is Associated with Improved Outcomes for FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Internal Tandem Duplication Acute Myeloid Leukemia Relapsing after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The optimal therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains unclear. In this study we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of sorafenib combined with other therapeutic strategies as salvage therapy for these patients. Eighty-three AML patients with FLT3-ITD relapsing after allo-HSCT were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients received salvage therapy containing sorafenib and 30 patients did not. Salvage therapy containing sorafenib was superior to that without sorafenib with respect to complete remission rates, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) (66.0% versus 30.0%, 46.8% versus 20.0%, and 44.9% versus 16.7%, respectively; P = .002, P = .003, and P = .001). Further subgroup analysis revealed that the OS and PFS of patients who received sorafenib combined with chemotherapy followed by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were superior to those receiving other therapeutic regimens, including sorafenib combined with chemotherapy, chemotherapy followed by DLI, and monochemotherapy (P = .003, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that salvage therapy including sorafenib was the only protective factor for longer OS (P = .035; hazard ratio [HR], .526); salvage therapy including sorafenib and DLI were the protective factors for longer PFS (P = .011, HR, .423; P = .019, HR, .508). Our data suggest that sorafenib therapy is associated with improved outcomes for FLT3-ITD AML relapsing after allo-HSCT, and whether sorafenib combined with chemotherapy followed by DLI reveals an optimal efficacy merits further study.     

Prognostic Impact of Donor Source on Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Adults with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis in Japan

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative therapeutic option for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). We retrospectively compared the post-transplantation outcomes of 159 patients with CMML who underwent allo-HSCT using 4 types of donor sources: HLA-matched related donor graft, unrelated bone marrow (U-BM), unrelated cord blood (U-CB), and HLA-mismatched related donor graft. The median patient age at allo-HSCT was 54 years (range, 16 to 75 years). In multivariate analyses, the use of HLA-matched related donor grafts correlated with better overall survival than U-BM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 3.48; P?=?.008), U-CB (HR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.07 to 6.95; P?<?.001), or HLA-mismatched related donor grafts (HR, 6.18; 95% CI, 2.70 to 14.15; P?<?.001). Mortality after the relapse or progression of CMML did not significantly differ among the 4 types of donor source. Transplantation-related mortality was highest in recipients of U-CB (HR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.33 to 8.26; P?=?.010). In patients with CMML, allo-HSCT using an alternative donor may contribute to durable remission; however, further improvements in transplantation-related mortality are required for this type of transplantation.     

Homozygous HLA-C1 is Associated with Reduced Risk of Relapse after HLA-Matched Transplantation in Patients with Myeloid Leukemia

Natural killer (NK) cells assume graft-versus-leukemia alloreactivity after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) through their inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs). KIR2D family members recognize HLA-C alleles with Asn80 (HLA-C1) or Lys80 (HLA-C2). The predominance of HLA-C1 over HLA-C2 and the frequent presence of KIR2DL1 are characteristic of Japanese people. We compared clinical outcomes among homozygous HLA-C1 (HLA-C1/C1) patients and heterozygous HLA-C1/C2 patients who underwent HLA-matched HSCT for hematologic malignancies by assessing the data of 10,638 patients from the Japanese national registry. HLA-C1/C1 recipients had a lower rate of relapse than HLA-C1/C2 recipients after transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (hazard ratio [HR], .79; P?=?.006) and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) (HR, .48; P?=?.025), but not for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR, 1.36), lymphoma (HR, .97), or low-grade myelodysplastic syndrome (HR, 1.40). We then grouped AML and CML patients together and divided them into several subgroups. Advantages of HLA-C1/C1 recipients over HLA-C1/C2 recipients regarding relapse were observed irrespective of donor relation (related: HR, .79, P?=?.069; unrelated: HR, .77, P?=?.022), preparative regimen (myeloablative: HR, .79, P?=?.014; reduced intensity: HR, .73, P?=?.084), and occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease (yes: HR, .70, P?=?.122; no, HR .71, P?=?.026) or cytomegalovirus reactivation (reactivated: HR .67,P?=?.054; nonreactivated: HR .71, P?=?.033); however, these advantages were not observed in recipients with a delay in achieving complete chimerism (HR, 1.06). The advantage of decreasing relapse and extending relapse-free survival of C1/1 over C1/2 KIR-ligand status was most pronounced in T cell-depleted HSCT (HR, .27; P?<?.001 and HR, .30; P?=?.002, respectively) and in children age <15 years (HR, .29; P?<?.001 and HR .31; P?<?.001, respectively). Our findings represent an important mechanism responsible for the immunity against HLA-C2–negative myeloid leukemia cells after HLA-matched transplantation.     

Promising Outcome of Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Comorbidities

The hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) has been recently proposed to predict the probability of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the usefulness of the HCT-CI in single-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) remains unclear. We investigated the impact of the HCT-CI on the clinical outcomes of allogeneic HSCT in a single-center retrospective study including 53 recipients of UCBT (UCBT group) and 90 recipients of other HSCT (non-UCBT group). In the non-UCBT group 2-year OS rates for HCT-CI score <?3 and?≥3 were 67% (n?=?74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 54% to 78%) and 26% (n?=?16; 95% CI, 7% to 51%), respectively (P?=?.001). In the UCBT group these rates were 66% (n?=?39; 95% CI, 48% to 79%) and 69% (n?=?14; 95% CI, 36% to 87%), respectively (P?=?.73). In the non-UCBT group 1-year NRM rates for HCT-CI score <?3 and?≥3 were 14% (95% CI, 6.4% to 22%) and 37% (95% CI, 14% to 61%), respectively (P?=?.02). In the UCBT group these rates were 6.1% (95% CI, 3.4% to 24%) and 7.7% (95% CI, .4% to 29%), respectively (P?=?.78). Using multivariate analysis we showed that HCT-CI score ≥ 3 was significantly associated with lower OS (hazard ratio, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.47 to 6.38; P?=?.003) and higher NRM (hazard ratio, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.18 to 6.96; P?=?.02) for the non-UCBT group. UCBT showed good OS with low incidence of NRM, even in patients with high HCT-CI scores. Altogether, we propose single-unit UCB to be a promising stem cell source for improving survival in patients with multiple comorbidities.     

Deep NPM1 Sequencing Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Improves Risk Assessment in Adults with NPM1-Mutated AML

Relapse is the major cause of death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Measurable residual disease (MRD) detected by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) before and after HCT is a strong, independent risk factor for relapse. As next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly applied in AML MRD detection, it remains to be determined if NGS can improve prediction of post-HCT relapse. Herein, we investigated pre-HCT MRD detected by MFC and NGS in 59 adult patients with NPM1-mutated AML in morphologic remission; 45 of the 59 had post-HCT MRD determined by MFC and NGS around day 28. Before HCT, MRD detected by MFC was the most significant risk factor for relapse (hazard ratio [HR],?4.63; P?<?.001), whereas MRD detected only by NGS was not. After HCT, MRD detected by either MFC or NGS was significant risk factor for relapse (HR, 4.96, P?=?.004 and HR, 4.36, P?=?.002, respectively). Combining pre- and post-HCT MRD provided the best prediction for relapse (HR, 5.25; P?<?.001), with a sensitivity at 83%. We conclude that NGS testing of mutated NPM1 post-HCT improves the risk assessment for relapse, whereas pre-HCT MFC testing identifies a subset of high-risk patients in whom additional therapy should be tested.     

Comparison of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation versus Haploidentical Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Favorable- and Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in First Complete Remission

Stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an attractive postremission treatment option for patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and for some favorable-risk AML patients with additional nongenetic risk factors. Autologous SCT (auto-SCT) and haploidentical donor SCT (haplo-SCT) are the widely used alternatives in cases of a lack of a HLA-matched donor. However, limited data have been published on the direct comparison between these 2 transplant types. Based on the transplant database in our center, we conducted a retrospective study involving patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML in first complete remission (CR1), according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Patients with extramedullary disease or those achieving CR by more than 2 cycles were excluded. In total, 195 patients were included in the study, 88 of whom underwent auto-SCT and 107 haplo-SCT. In the entire cohort analyses the impact of high relapse incidence in the auto-SCT group was compensated by low nonrelapse mortality (NRM), which resulted in a comparable overall survival (OS) (79.0%?±?4.6% versus 80.1%?±?5.0%, P?=?.769) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (66.1%?±?5.2% versus 77.4%?±?4.8%, P?=?.079) compared with those observed in the haplo-SCT group. However, for patients with intermediate-risk AML, NRM was similar between the groups, and haplo-SCT exhibited superior survival. In case of post-SCT relapse, patients with intermediate-risk AML showed markedly inferior 3-year OS compared with that shown by patients with favorable-risk AML (23.3%?±?9.8% versus 60.8%?±?14.3%, P?=?.011). In the multivariate analyses, minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by flow cytometry and gene mutation status before transplantation were independent predictors for both OS and RFS. We concluded that both auto-SCT and haplo-SCT were acceptable options for postremission treatment of patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML. Haplo-SCT yielded a better outcome in patients with intermediate-risk AML, but the relapse after SCT still led to a poor outcome. Clearance of MRD before SCT could improve the prognosis after transplantation.     

Outcomes of Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma after Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation: A Eurocord and EBMT Lymphoma and Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Party Study

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is an alternative for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but only limited data on unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) are available. We analyzed 131 adults with HL who underwent UCBT in European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers from 2003 to 2015. Disease status at UCBT was complete remission (CR) in 59 patients (47%), and almost all patients had received a previous autologous stem cell transplantation. The 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19% to 34%) and 46% (95% CI, 37% to 55%), respectively. Relapse incidence was 44% (95% CI, 36% to 54%), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 31% (95% CI, 23% to 40%) at 4 years. In multivariate analysis refractory/relapsed disease status at UCBT was associated with increased relapse incidence (hazard ratio [HR], 3.14 [95% CI, 1.41 to 7.00], P?=?.005) and NRM (HR, 3.61 [95% CI, 1.58 to 8.27], P?=?.002) and lower PFS (HR, 3.45 [95% CI, 1.95 to 6.10], P < .001) and OS (HR, 3.10 [95% CI, 1.60 to 5.99], P?=?.001). Conditioning regimen with cyclophosphamide?+?fludarabine?+?2 Gy total body irradiation (Cy+Flu+2GyTBI) was associated with decreased risk of NRM (HR, .26 [95% CI, .10 to .64], P?=?.004). Moreover, Cy+Flu+2GyTBI conditioning regimen was associated with a better OS (HR, .25 [95% CI, .12 to .50], P < .001) and PFS (HR, .51 [95% CI, .27 to .96], P?=?.04). UCBT is feasible in heavily pretreated patients with HL. The reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with Cy+Flu+2GyTBI is associated with a better OS and NRM. However, outcomes are poor in patients not in CR at UCBT.     

Impact of Toxicity on Survival for Older Adult Patients after CD34+ Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Ex vivo CD34⁺ selection before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) reduces graft-versus-host disease without increasing relapse but usually requires myeloablative conditioning. We aimed to identify toxicity patterns in older patients and the association with overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 patients who underwent CD34⁺ selection allo-HCT using the ClinicMACS® system between 2006 and 2012. All grade 3 to 5 toxicities by CTCAE v4.0 were collected. Eighty patients aged ≥ 60 years with a median age of 64 (range, 60 to 73) were compared with 120 patients aged < 60 years. Median follow-up in survivors was 48.2 months. OS and NRM were similar between ages ≥ 60 and <60, with 1-year OS 70% versus 78% (P?=?.07) and 1-year NRM 23% versus 13% (P?=?.38), respectively. In patients aged ≥ 60 the most common toxicities by day 100 were metabolic, with a cumulative incidence of 88% (95% CI, 78% to 93%), infectious 84% (95% CI, 73% to 90%), hematologic 80% (95% CI, 69% to 87%), oral/gastrointestinal (GI) 48% (95% CI, 36% to 58%), cardiovascular (CV) 35% (95% CI, 25% to 46%), and hepatic 25% (95% CI, 16% to 35%). Patients aged ≥ 60 had a higher risk of neurologic (HR, 2.63 [95% CI, 1.45 to 4.78]; P?=?.001) and CV (HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.04 to 2.63]; P?=?.03) toxicities but a lower risk of oral/GI (HR, .58 [95% CI, .41 to .83]; P?=?.003) compared with those aged < 60. CV, hepatic, neurologic, pulmonary, and renal toxicities remained independent risk factors for the risk of death and NRM in separate multivariate models adjusting for age and hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index. Overall, the toxicity of a more intense regimen is potentially balanced by the absence of toxicity related to methotrexate and calcineurin inhibitors in older patients. Prospective study of toxicities after allo-HCT in older patients is essential.     

CD34+ Cell Selection versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning and Unmodified Grafts for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients Age >50 Years with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and T cell depletion (TCD) through CD34⁺ cell selection without the use of post-transplantation immunosuppression are 2 strategies used to reduce nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in older patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). To compare the efficacy of the RIC and TCD approaches, we evaluated the outcomes of patients age >50 years with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who underwent allo-HCT from an HLA-matched donor with one of these strategies. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the patients receiving TCD (n?=?204) and those receiving RIC (n?=?151), except for a higher proportion of unrelated donors (68% versus 40%; P?<?.001) and a higher comorbidity burden (Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index [HCT-CI] ≥3: 51% versus 38%; P?<?.001) in the TCD cohort. Analysis of outcomes at 3 years showed a higher chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)/relapse-free survival (CRFS) (51% versus 7%; P?<?.001), lower incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD (18% versus 46% at day +180) and chronic GVHD (6% versus 55% at 3 years; P?<?.001), and a lower incidence of relapse (19% versus 33% at 3 years; P?=?.001) in the TCD group compared with the RIC group. Relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and NRM were similar in the 2 groups. Combining transplantation approach (RIC versus TCD) and comorbidity burden (HCT-CI 0-2 versus ≥3), patients with an HCT-CI score of 0-2 seemed to benefit from the TCD approach. In conclusion, in this retrospective study, the use of a CD34⁺ cell-selected graft and a myeloablative conditioning regimen was associated with higher CRFS and similar RFS and OS compared with unmodified allo-RIC in patients age >50 years with AML and MDS.     

Favorable Effect of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation on Outcomes in Cord Blood Transplant and Its Differences Among Disease Risk or Type

The effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation on cord blood transplant (CBT) are unclear. We assessed the effect of CMV reactivation in adult single-unit CBT without in vivo T cell depletion. Of 3147 eligible cases, 2052 were acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 643 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and 452 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). CMV reactivation up to 100 days after CBT was associated with better overall survival (OS) compared with no reactivation cases (57.3% versus 52.6% at 3 years after CBT), whereas nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was increased in ALL (16.2% versus 8.9%) and standard disease risk (17.1% versus 10.6%, P = .014) by CMV reactivation. On multivariate analysis, CMV reactivation had favorable effects on relapse in MDS (hazard ratio [HR], .55; P = .044) and high disease risk (HR, .77; P = .047). In NRM, only standard-risk cases showed adverse effects of CMV reactivation (HR, 1.56; P = .026). OS was significantly improved with CMV reactivation in a subgroup of patients with AML (HR, .84; P = .044), MDS (HR, .68; P = .048), and high disease risk (HR, .81; P = .013). This favorable effect of CMV reactivation on OS in AML and high disease risk cases was maintained even after considering the effect of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease. Thus, CMV reactivation might have beneficial or adverse effects on relapse, NRM, and OS, depending on the disease type or disease risk.     

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation versus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Here we compare outcomes between the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus chemotherapy regimen and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (transplantation cohort) in patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+?ALL) and explore factors associated with prognosis. Data from 145 Ph+?ALL patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were treated with imatinib plus chemotherapy and then transplantation or continuous TKIs with chemotherapy based on patient preference. A total of 145 Ph+?ALL patients were recruited for this study (median age, 37 years; range, 14 to 65). Among these patients, 81 were men (55.9%) and 86 underwent IKZF1 detection, which identified 59 patients (68.6%) with IKZF1 deletions. After treatment 136 patients (95.8%) achieved complete remission (CR) eventually. With a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 4 to 114) for CR patients, 77 patients (57.9%) underwent transplantation and 56 (42.1%) received continuous TKIs with chemotherapy. At the 4-year follow-up the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were 29.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.9% to 34.4%), 60.9% (95% CI, 56.5% to 65.3%), and 69.2% (95% CI, 65.1% to 73.3%), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that WBC?counts <?30?×?10⁹/L at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 4.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 9.2; P??<?.001; HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.9; P?=?.003; HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 5.4; P?=?.003), 3-log reduction of BCR-ABL levels from baseline after 2 consolidation cycles (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.9 to 9.9; P?<?.001; HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.7 to 5.9; P? <?.001; HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.9 to 8.7; P?=?.001; defined as “minimal residual disease low level”), and transplantation (HR, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.2 to 11.2; P??<?.001; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.4; P???<?.001; HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.9 to 8.7; P???<?.001) were the favorable factors of CIR, DFS, and OS. According to the first 2 risk factors, CR patients were divided into 3 groups: low risk (no factor, n?=?42, 31.6%), intermediate risk (1 factor, n?=?73, 54.9%), and high risk (2 factors, n?=?18, 13.5%). In the low-risk group at the 4-year follow up no significant difference existed between the transplant and nontransplant arms for the probabilities of CIR (8.5% versus 7.7%, P?=?.671), DFS (88.2% versus 83.9%, P?=?.426), and OS (96.6% versus 83.3%, P?=?.128). In the intermediate- and high-risk groups at the 4-year follow-up, CIR (23.6% versus 36.9%, P?=?.017; 37.5% versus 100.0%, P???<.001), DFS (62.4% versus 43.8%, P?=?.048; 56.2% versus 0%, P???<.001), and OS (76.1% versus 47.7%, P?=?.037; 51.4% versus 6.3%, P?=?.001) rates were significantly better in the transplant arm than in the nontransplant arm. In surviving patients of the low-risk group, no difference in complete molecular response (CMR) rates (85.7% versus 72.7%, P?=?.379) between the transplant and nontransplant arms was found. However, in the intermediate-risk group the proportion of CMR was significantly higher in the transplant arm than in the nontransplant arm (82.8% versus 42.9%, P?=?.006). In the high-risk group 4 of 7 transplant patients (57.1%) were in CMR, and no patients survived in the nontransplant arm. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation confers significant survival advantages for Ph+?ALL patients compared with TKIs plus chemotherapy, especially in intermediate- and high-risk patients.     

Superior Survival of Black Versus White Patients Following Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Haploidentical Transplantation for Adults with Hematologic Malignancy

Available evidence from large registry studies has shown inferior survival for black adult patients following both unrelated donor and cord blood transplantation. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)–based haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT) is being increasingly used in ethnic minorities. However, no studies of the impact of race on outcomes following HIDT have been reported. We analyzed 203 consecutive patients (123 white, 80 black) who underwent first HIDT using PTCy for hematologic malignancy at a single institution. Median recipient age was 53 (range, 19-75) years. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were used as the stem cell source in 66% of patients, and conditioning intensity was myeloablative (MA) in 41%. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were significantly better in black patients, compared with white patients (72% [95% confidence interval (CI), 60% to 81%], 65% [95% CI, 52% to 75%], and 25% [95% CI, 16% to 35] versus 50% [95% CI, 40% to 59%], 45% [95% CI, 36% to 54%], and 39% [95% CI, 31% to 47%], respectively; P?<?.001 for OS and DFS, P?=?.015 for CIR). In contrast, 3-year nonrelapse mortality was similar between black (11%) and white (16%) patients, as were the incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD. Improved survival was noted in all subgroups of black patients—younger versus older, male versus female, lower versus higher disease risk index, MA versus non-MA conditioning, or PBSC versus marrow stem cell source. In multivariate analysis, black race was independently associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR], .47; P?=?.003), DFS (HR, .49; P?=?.003), and relapse (HR, .49; P?=?.01). Black patients achieve superior outcomes to their white counterparts following PTCy-based HIDT due to a decreased incidence of disease relapse.     

Clinical Impact of Pretransplant Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Colonization in Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) are an emerging cause of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Three-hundred forty-eight consecutive patients transplanted at our hospital from July 2012 to January 2016 were screened for a pretransplant MDR-GNB colonization and evaluated for clinical outcomes. A pretransplant MDR-GNB colonization was found in 16.9% of allo-HSCT and in 9.6% of auto-HSCT recipients. Both in auto- and in allo-HSCT, carriers of a MDR-GNB showed no significant differences in overall survival (OS), transplant-related mortality (TRM), or infection-related mortality (IRM) compared with noncarriers. OS at 2 years for carriers compared with noncarriers was 85% versus 81% (P?=?.262) in auto-HSCT and 50% versus 43% (P?=?.091) in allo-HSCT. TRM at 2 years was 14% versus 5% (P?=?.405) in auto-HSCT and 31% versus 25% (P?=?.301) in allo-HSCT. IRM at 2 years was 14% versus 2% (P?=?.142) in auto-HSCT and 23% versus 14% (P?=?.304) in allo-HSCT. In multivariate analysis, only grade III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease was an independent factor for reduced OS (P?<?.001) and increased TRM (P?<?.001) and IRM (P?<?.001). During the first year after transplant, we collected 73 GNB bloodstream infectious (BSI) episodes in 54 patients, 42.4% of which sustained by a MDR-GNB. Rectal swabs positivity associated with the pathogen causing subsequent MDR-GNB BSI episodes in 13 of 31 (41.9%). Overall, OS at 4 months from MDR-GNB BSI episode onset was of 67.9%, with a 14-day attributed mortality of 12.9%, not being significantly different between carriers and noncarriers (P?=?.207). We conclude that in this extended single-center experience, a pretransplant MDR-GNB colonization did not significantly influence OS, TRM, and IRM both in auto- and allo-HSCT settings and that MDR-GNB attributed mortality can be controlled in carriers when an early pre-emptive antimicrobial therapy is started in case of neutropenic fever.     

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Therapy-Related Myelodysplasia after Autologous Transplantation for Lymphoma: A Retrospective Study of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a rare complication with no curative option. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) may be considered for eligible patients and has been understudied in t-MDS. We report 47 consecutive patients with t-MDS after an ASCT who underwent allo-HSCT with a median age of 58 years (range, 30 to 71 years) at transplantation and a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 0.7 to 107). The median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0 to 19 months). OS rates were 45% (29% to 60%) and 30% (15% to 45%) at 1 and 3 years after transplantation, respectively. On univariate analysis, prior therapy for t-MDS before allo-HSCT (P = .02) and mismatched donors (P = .004) were associated with poor OS. Three-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse rates were 44% (25% to 63%) and 41% (22% to 61%), respectively. Mismatched donors (P < .001) were associated with higher NRM and a high-risk MDS (P = .008) with a higher relapse risk. On multivariate analysis, HLA mismatch was associated with higher NRM (hazard ratio, 6.21; 95% CI, 1.63 to 23.62; P = .007). In conclusion, our results suggest that one third of the patients who develop t-MDS after an ASCT for lymphoma are cured after an allo-HSCT. The use of mismatched donors with standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis should be avoided in such an indication for allo-HSCT. It will be worthwhile to see if the implementation of cyclophosphamide post-transplantation will improve the outcome with mismatched donors.     

T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed after Autologous Transplantation: Reduced Incidence of Relapse and of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Compared with HLA-Identical Related Donors

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) represents a potential curative strategy for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) relapsing after autologous SCT (ASCT), but the incidence of disease relapse is still high. We performed a retrospective study on 64 patients with HL relapsing after ASCT to compare outcomes after HLA-identical SCT (HLAid-SCT; n?=?34) and haploidentical SCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) (Haplo-SCT; n?=?30). All patients engrafted, with a significantly shorter median time for neutrophil and platelet engraftment after HLAid compared with Haplo-SCT (14 days versus 19 days and 11 days versus 23 days, respectively; P?<?.005). With a median follow-up of 47 months, 3-year overall survival (OS), 3 -year progression-free survival (PFS), and 1-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 53%, 44% and 17%, respectively. Recipients of Haplo-SCT were less likely to experience disease relapse (3-year cumulative incidence of relapse, 13% versus 62%; P?=?.0001) and chronic graft- versus-host disease (GVHD; 3% versus 32%; P?=?.003), resulting in improved PFS (60% versus 29%; P?=?.04) and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (47% versus 17%; P?=?.06). The 3-year OS did not differ between the 2 groups (56% versus 54%; P?not significant), and NRM was higher after Haplo-SCT, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (26% versus 9%; P?=?.09). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, receipt of Haplo-SCT (hazard ratio [HR], .17; P?=?.02) and achieving optimal disease control (complete remission before SCT: HR, .6; P?<?.0001) were the only independent variables associated with a reduced risk of disease relapse. Haplo-SCT is a valid option for patients with HL relapsing after ASCT, with a reduced incidence of relapse compared with HLAid SCT.     

Impact of HLA Disparity in Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation Followed by High-Dose Cyclophosphamide

We studied the impact of HLA mismatching on the outcome of 318 consecutive patients who received an unmanipulated haploidentical bone marrow transplant, followed by post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). The number of HLA-mismatched antigens was tested for its impact on overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), whereas HLA mismatches in the graft-versus-host (GVH) direction were tested for prediction of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD and relapse. Finally, we studied whether graft rejection correlated with the number of HLA mismatched antigens in host-versus-graft (HVG) direction. Two hundred thirty-one donor–recipient pairs (72%) had 4/8 mismatches at the -A, -B, -C, -DRB1 HLA loci. HLA mismatches did not predict the 2-year OS (hazard ratio, .83; P?=?.58) and NRM (subhazard ratio, 1.08; P?=?.93). The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (P?=?.13), 1-year chronic GVHD (P?=?.84), and relapse rate (P?=?.26) did not correlate with univectorial GVH mismatches. Similarly, no correlation was observed between the amount of HLA mismatch in the HVG direction and graft rejection. In multivariate analysis advanced disease at transplant was the strongest predictor of survival, NRM, relapse, and graft rejection. In conclusion, the degree of HLA mismatching should not be used as a criterion to select family haploidentical donors when using bone marrow as stem cell source and PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis.