Ustekinumab improves health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 1 trial

Background PHOENIX 1 was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study that demonstrated the long‐term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. Objectives To assess the effect of ustekinumab maintenance therapy on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in PHOENIX 1 patients. Patients and methods Patients (n = 766) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 45 mg (n = 255) or 90 mg (n = 256) at weeks 0 and 4 and every 12 weeks thereafter, or placebo (n = 255) at weeks 0 and 4 with crossover to ustekinumab at week 12. Ustekinumab‐randomized patients achieving at least 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at weeks 28 and 40 were re‐randomized at week 40 to continue ustekinumab or be withdrawn until loss of therapeutic effect. HRQoL was assessed using the SF‐36 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results At baseline, more than 97% had a DLQI > 1 and the average DLQI was > 10, indicating a significant impact on patients’ HRQoL. Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving ustekinumab 45 and 90 mg achieved a normalized DLQI score (≤ 1) compared with placebo (53·2%, 52·4% and 6·0%, respectively, both P < 0·001) at week 12 and achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (increase of at least five points) in SF‐36 physical (23·1%, 33·7% and 15·6%) and mental (25·5%, 31·3% and 14·8%) component summary scores. At week 12, changes in individual DLQI and SF‐36 domains were significantly better in each ustekinumab group vs. placebo (P < 0·001). The magnitude of improvement across SF‐36 scales was greatest for the bodily pain and social functioning domains. Improvements in HRQoL were sustained with maintenance ustekinumab therapy through at least 1 year. Regression analysis showed that, after adjustment for improvement in PASI or Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), ustekinumab‐treated patients demonstrated significant improvements in DLQI. Conclusions Ustekinumab improves HRQoL in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. Patient‐reported outcomes measured a treatment effect beyond that indicated by clinical measures.     

Efficacy and safety of infliximab vs. methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results of an open-label, active-controlled, randomized trial (RESTORE1)

Background Infliximab is indicated for treatment of moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis in adults whose disease cannot be controlled with other systemic therapies, including methotrexate (MTX). To date, no studies have directly compared the efficacy and safety of infliximab and MTX. Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab vs. MTX in adults with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. Methods MTX‐naïve patients (n = 868) were randomized 3 : 1 to receive infliximab 5 mg kg^?1 at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22 or MTX 15 mg weekly with a dose increase to 20 mg weekly at week 6 if the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response was < 25%. At week 16, patients with < PASI 50 response could switch treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was PASI 75 response at week 16. Major secondary efficacy endpoints were PASI 75 response at week 26, and the proportion of patients achieving a Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) at weeks 16 and 26. Others included Dermatology Life Quality Index, 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey, and PGA, PASI 50, PASI 75 and PASI 90 responses over time. Results The primary endpoint was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of infliximab‐treated patients (508/653, 78%) than MTX‐treated patients (90/215, 42%; P < 0·001). Key secondary endpoints also were achieved by a greater proportion of infliximab‐treated patients. Similar responses were observed at week 26 in patients who switched from MTX to infliximab at week 16. Overall adverse event (AE) incidence was comparable between groups, but incidence of serious and severe AEs was slightly higher in the infliximab group. Conclusions Infliximab was well tolerated and more efficacious than MTX in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. Infliximab also was efficacious in patients who failed MTX and switched to infliximab.     

Infliximab improves health-related quality of life in the presence of comorbidities among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

Background  Psoriasis affects patients both physically and psychologically.
Objectives  To investigate the effect of comorbidities on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to determine whether infliximab improved HRQoL in the presence of these conditions.
Methods  In this multicentre, double-blind study, 835 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized to receive infliximab 3 or 5 mg kg⁻¹ or placebo at weeks 0, 2 and 6. Infliximab-treated patients were re-randomized at week 14 to receive the same treatment every 8 weeks or as needed through week 46; placebo patients crossed over to infliximab 5 mg kg⁻¹ at week 16. Disease severity (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI) and HRQoL (Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI; 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, SF-36) were measured at various time points. The effect of patient comorbidities on baseline HRQoL was assessed using multiple regression models. The impact of key comorbidities on infliximab treatment effect was also assessed.
Results  Disease severity (PASI), depression and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were predictors of poor baseline HRQoL. At week 10, infliximab 3 and 5 mg kg⁻¹ significantly improved physical and mental health dimensions of the SF-36 and the DLQI (all P  < 0·001). Consistent improvement in HRQoL with infliximab treatment was observed regardless of baseline patient characteristics or comorbidities. Through week 50, HRQoL and PASI scores were most improved with infliximab 5 mg kg⁻¹ administered every 8 weeks.
Conclusions  Disease severity, depression and PsA were significant predictors of poor HRQoL. Infliximab significantly improved HRQoL, regardless of these characteristics.     

Infliximab for the treatment of psoriasis in Greece: 4 years of clinical experience at a single centre

Background Infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective for moderate to severe psoriasis. Clinical experience with long‐term infliximab therapy for psoriasis is accumulating, and it is therefore important to share our experience with its use in real‐life clinical practice. Objectives To report our experience with infliximab (Remicade^®; Schering Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, U.S.A.) for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (and/or arthritis) from a single clinic in Greece. Patients and methods Between August 2004 and March 2008, 62 patients presenting to our clinic with moderate to severe psoriasis were treated with infliximab. Disease phenotype, clinical course, disease severity and adverse events were assessed throughout the treatment period. Results Infliximab resulted in a reduction of median Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 70% at week 6 and 84·4% at week 14. Nineteen patients who have completed 1 year on infliximab treatment experienced sustained efficacy with a median PASI improvement of 92·16% and a Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) of ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear’, while nine patients have reached approximately 20 months of continuous therapy. All patients with psoriatic arthritis showed marked improvement in their clinical symptoms following the first infusion. Eight patients (12·9%) experienced adverse events that required discontinuation of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in PASI and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores between patients with arthritis and those with only skin lesions, or between those who received methotrexate, either from the beginning or during infliximab therapy, and those who did not receive methotrexate at all. Selected patients of interest are discussed. Conclusions The above data confirm previous reports that treatment with infliximab is an efficacious and safe option for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (and/or arthritis). Long‐term follow‐up, continued pharmacovigilance, and controlled comparative studies will be required to fully evaluate its use in the treatment of psoriasis.     

Combining etanercept and acitretin in the therapy of chronic plaque psoriasis: a 24-week, randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded pilot trial

Background Combination treatments may increase efficacy while reducing dosages and side‐effects of individual agents. No randomized controlled trials have been published combining biologics with conventional agents for psoriasis. Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of the association of acitretin and etanercept in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Methods A 24‐week, randomized, controlled, investigator‐blinded pilot trial was conducted. Sixty adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis were randomized into three groups to receive etanercept 25 mg twice weekly subcutaneously, oral acitretin 0·4 mg kg^?1 daily or etanercept 25 mg once weekly plus acitretin 0·4 mg kg^?1 daily. The primary end point was a 75% or greater improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline (PASI 75) at week 24. Results At week 24, PASI 75 response was achieved by 10 of 22 patients in the etanercept group (45%), six of 20 in the acitretin group (30%) and eight of 18 (44%) in the group treated with etanercept plus acitretin (P = 0·001 for both etanercept groups compared with acitretin alone). A 50% or greater improvement from baseline in PASI was achieved by 15 of 22 (68%), 10 of 20 (50%) and 12 of 18 (67%) patients, respectively (P = 0·001). The safety profiles of the three groups were similar. Conclusions A combined therapeutic regimen with etanercept 25 mg once weekly and acitretin 0·4 mg kg^?1 daily is as effective as etanercept 25 mg twice weekly, and more effective than acitretin alone. Although larger studies are needed to confirm these results, the etanercept/acitretin association could offer several advantages in the therapy of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.     

Brodalumab and ixekizumab,anti‐interleukin‐17‐receptor antibodies for psoriasis: a critical appraisal

Aim Papp et al. (N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1181–9) and Leonardi et al. (N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1190–9) respectively assessed the efficacy and safety of brodalumab (AMG 827), a human monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin (IL)‐17RA, the receptor of IL‐17A and ixekizumab (LY2439821), a humanized anti‐IL‐17 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. Setting and design In these phase II, multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging studies, 198 patients with severe chronic plaque‐type psoriasis [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 12, body surface area (BSA) ≥ 10] were enrolled in Papp et al. between December 2009 and April 2010 and 142 patients in Leonardi et al. between April 2010 and March 2011. Study exposure In Papp et al., patients with chronic plaque‐type psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive placebo or brodalumab at a dose of 70, 140 or 210 mg, administered subcutaneously on day 1 and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10, or at a dose of 280 mg administered subcutaneously on day 1 and at weeks 4 and 8. In Leonardi et al., patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo or 10, 25, 75 or 150 mg of ixekizumab at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks, followed by a 4‐week follow‐up period. Outcomes In both studies the PASI, static Physician’s Global Assessment (sPGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), adverse events, and routine haematological and laboratory values were analysed. Additionally in Papp et al. the BSA and Medical Outcomes Study 36‐item short‐form health survey, and in Leonardi et al. the joint pain visual analogue scale (VAS), itch severity VAS, Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) and the Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) were also measured. Primary outcome measures At week 12, in Papp et al. and Leonardi et al.: (A) The percentage improvement in PASI. In Leonardi et al. (and in Papp et al. as one of the secondary outcomes): (B) The percentage of patients who achieved a reduction in the PASI by at least 75% (PASI 75) over baseline. Results Primary endpoints: (A) At week 12 in Papp et al., the mean improvements in PASI were significantly greater in the 140, 210 and 280 mg brodalumab groups than in the 70 mg brodalumab group (85·9%, 86·3% and 76·0%, respectively, vs. 45·0%; P < 0·001); in addition, the mean improvement in PASI was significantly greater in each brodalumab group than in the placebo group (16·0%; P < 0·001). (At week 16 lower but still significant percentages compared with placebo were seen). In Leonardi et al., the mean improvements in PASI of the 10, 25, 75 and 150 mg ixekizumab groups are not reported. Significant differences between the two highest dose groups and the placebo group were seen as early as 1 week in PASI. (B) At week 12 in Papp et al., the percentages of patients with PASI 75 were 33% in the 70 mg, 77% in the 140 mg, 82% in the 210 mg and 67% in the 280 mg brodalumab group. The percentages of patients with a 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement in PASI at week 12 were significantly higher among patients who received brodalumab (taking into account all doses) than among patients who received placebo. The authors do not give an explanation for the lower improvements at week 16. In Leonardi et al., the PASI 75 occurred in significantly more patients in the 25 mg (76·7%), 75 mg (82·8%) and 150 mg (82·1%) ixekizumab groups vs. placebo (7·7%; P < 0·001). No significant difference was seen for the 10 mg group. Significant differences between the 150 mg group and the placebo group were seen as early as 2 weeks in PASI 75. Differences were sustained through 20 weeks for all clinical measures in the ixekizumab study. Secondary endpoints: At week 12, in Papp et al., significant decreases of BSA, sPGA and DLQI were also seen. In Leonardi et al., significantly higher percentages of patients in the three highest ixekizumab dose groups had an sPGA score of 0 (clear of disease) or of 0 or 1 (minimal disease) for each dose and score group vs. placebo (P < 0·05). Significant reductions in the mean ± SD DLQI scores were detected at 8 weeks in the 150 mg ixekizumab group (?7·8 ± 5·7), the 75 mg ixekizumab group (?8·5 ± 5·1) and the 25 mg ixekizumab group (?7·1 ± 6·5) as compared with placebo (?2·4 ± 4·4) for all comparisons (P < 0·001). In addition, at 16 weeks, significantly more patients had a DLQI score of 0 in the 150, 75 and 25 mg ixekizumab groups (39·3%, 37·9% and 31·0%, respectively) as compared with placebo (0%) for all comparisons (P < 0·05). In Leonardi et al., significant reductions were seen in the PSSI, in the NAPSI and in the itch severity (VAS scores). Significant reductions from baseline of the joint pain VAS were also observed in the 150 mg ixekizumab group at 12 weeks, and this reduction was sustained through 20 weeks. At week 16: with respect to the other secondary efficacy endpoints and patient‐reported outcomes, significant improvements in scores were seen compared with placebo, but some of these differences were lower than observed at week 12. Safety Papp et al. summarized that during the first 12 weeks of the trial, 68% of the patients in the 70 mg brodalumab group, 69% (140 mg), 82% (210 mg), 73% (280 mg) and 62% in the placebo group had at least one adverse event. Although the authors mentioned only three serious adverse events, four were reported during the study: renal colic (70 mg brodalumab group), two patients with grade 3 asymptomatic neutropenia (210 mg brodalumab group; Papp et al. clarified that only one of these episodes was a serious adverse event) and an ectopic pregnancy in one patient in the placebo group. Leonardi et al. reported that there were no serious adverse events in any group. The frequency of adverse events was similar between the combined ixekizumab groups and the placebo group. A few patients were withdrawn from the trial due to adverse events including hypertriglyceridaemia (placebo group), peripheral oedema (10 mg ixekizumab), hypersensitivity (10 mg ixekizumab) and urticaria (25 mg ixekizumab). Conclusions Papp et al. and Leonardi et al. concluded that brodalumab and ixekizumab, respectively, significantly improved plaque psoriasis in 12‐week, phase II studies. For difficult‐to‐treat areas such as the scalp and nails, significant differences from placebo were observed with ixekizumab treatment. These trials were not large enough or of long enough duration to ascertain uncommon adverse events or to assess the risk of infection or cardiovascular events.     

An assessment of adalimumab efficacy in three Phase III clinical trials using the European Consensus Programme criteria for psoriasis treatment goals

Background The European Consensus Programme (ECP) established pan‐European consensus definitions of psoriasis disease severity and treatment goals among 19 psoriasis experts from European nations. Objectives To use the ECP treatment goals to retrospectively assess adalimumab efficacy in patients who participated in Phase III clinical trials and met ECP criteria for moderate to severe psoriasis. Methods Three trials were analysed: CHAMPION (n = 108), REVEAL (n = 814) and BELIEVE (n = 364). Moderate to severe psoriasis was defined as Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score > 10, with either > 10% body surface area involvement or Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score > 10. Treatment goals were achieved with either treatment success (≥ 75% PASI score reduction) or intermediate response (PASI response ≥ 50% and < 75%) with DLQI ≤ 5. Results The percentages of patients who achieved treatment goals at week 16 in CHAMPION, REVEAL and BELIEVE were, respectively, (i) treatment success, 79·3%, 72·1% and 68·2%; (ii) intermediate response, 1·7%, 5·0% and 5·0%; or (iii) either goal, 81·0%, 77·1% and 73·2%. DLQI ≤ 5 at week 16 was achieved by 70·7%, 70·1% and 67·4% of patients, respectively. Differences between the percentages of adalimumab‐ vs. placebo‐treated patients achieving treatment success were statistically significant (P < 0·001) from week 4 and week 8 of REVEAL and CHAMPION, respectively. Conclusions Treatment success was achieved by > 93% of patients who attained treatment goals. At week 16 > 70% of patients achieved ECP treatment goals and met ECP criteria for continued treatment without modification. These results support the utility of ECP treatment goals for the assessment of therapeutic efficacy in moderate to severe psoriasis.     

Dramatic impact of a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 response on the quality of life in patients with psoriasis: an analysis of Japanese clinical trials of infliximab

European S3 Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis in 2009 propose 75% or more improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index from baseline (PASI 75) and a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 as treatment goals. However, the relationship of these two parameters is yet to be clarified. Herein, we analyzed the data pooled from two Japanese phase III clinical trials on psoriasis with infliximab to clarify the PASI response necessary to achieve a DLQI of 0 or 1. Of the 90 patients, the mean percent improvement in PASI at week 50 or 66 was 74.5%, and the PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates were 66.7% and 46.7%, respectively; no difference in the improvement was noted among the body areas. Significant improvements in nail psoriasis were also observed. A negative correlation was shown between the improvement in PASI and DLQI. Patients who achieved a PASI 90 response had a significantly higher percentage of achieving a DLQI of 0 or 1 than the patients who achieved a PASI 75 but not a PASI 90 response. The median serum trough level of infliximab was maintained at 2 μg/mL or more in the PASI 90 responders, whereas it was less than 1 μg/mL at week 30 and on in the others. The present results demonstrate that a PASI 90 response is necessary to achieve a DLQI of 0 or 1. Infliximab is considered a useful drug in meeting the treatment goal of achieving a DLQI of 0 or 1 through the attainment of a PASI 90 response.     

Successful treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with the PEGylated Fab' certolizumab pegol: results of a phase II randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a re-treatment extension

Background Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a PEGylated antitumour necrosis factor agent. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CZP in patients with plaque psoriasis. Methods In a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study, 176 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis received placebo or CZP 400 mg at week 0 followed by placebo or CZP (200 or 400 mg) every other week until week 10. Co‐primary endpoints were ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and a Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) of clear‐almost clear at week 12. A re‐treatment extension study was conducted in 71 CZP PASI 75 responders who relapsed during a 12‐ to 24‐week observation period without treatment. Results PASI 75 was achieved by 44/59 (75%), 48/58 (83%) and 4/59 (7%) patients in the CZP 200 mg, CZP 400 mg and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0·001 for both treatment arms vs. placebo). A PGA score of clear‐almost clear was achieved by 53%, 72% and 2%, respectively (P < 0·001 for both treatment arms vs. placebo). In the re‐treatment study median PASI scores were similar at week 12 in the first treatment and re‐treatment periods for both CZP groups. Serious adverse events occurred in 3%, 5% and 2% of CZP 200 mg, CZP 400 mg and placebo patients, respectively. Conclusions Treatment with CZP significantly improved psoriasis at week 12. Similar efficacy was observed at week 12 in patients receiving re‐treatment for loss of response after drug withdrawal.     

Improvement in quality of life with infliximab induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis has a well-documented, markedly negative effect on patient quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of long-term infliximab maintenance therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were administered as part of the pivotal double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety EXPRESS study of infliximab in chronic plaque psoriasis. In total, 378 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were enrolled at 32 centres in Europe and Canada. Patients were randomized to receive either placebo or infliximab 5 mg kg(-1) induction at weeks 0, 2 and 6 followed by maintenance every 8 weeks; placebo patients crossed over at week 24 to receive the infliximab induction and maintenance regimen. RESULTS: At week 10, infliximab-treated patients had significantly greater improvement in DLQI scores (P < 0.001) and SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores (P < 0.001) than placebo-treated patients. Significant improvement (P < 0.001) was also seen in all eight SF-36 subscales, and was greatest for the "Bodily Pain" and "Social Functioning" scales. Significant improvement in HRQoL persisted with maintenance infliximab treatment at week 24 (P < 0.001), with patients achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score of 0 reporting the greatest benefit. Treatment-related HRQoL improvement remained substantial at week 50. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab induction and maintenance regimens resulted in rapid, substantial, sustained and clinically meaningful improvement in both dermatology-specific and general quality of life indices in patients with psoriasis, with total clearance resulting in maximum improvement.     

Infliximab treatment improves productivity among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

This study examined the impact of infliximab maintenance therapy on productivity in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patients from the multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled EXPRESS study (n = 378) were randomised to receive infusions of placebo or infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and every 8 weeks through week 46, with placebo crossover to infliximab at week 24. Main outcome measures were a 10-cm productivity visual analog scale (VAS), role-physical and role-emotional domain scores of the Short Form 36-Item questionnaire (SF-36), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores. The productivity VAS score was 5.9 cm at baseline. Mean change through week 10 with infliximab was significantly greater than that with placebo (2.7 cm vs. - 0.1 cm) and was sustained through week 24. Similar trends were observed for SF-36 scores. The proportion of patients whose skin condition prevented them from working and/or studying per DLQI scores decreased through week 10 with infliximab (12.1% and 1.4%, respectively), but increased slightly with placebo (9.1% and 11.6%, respectively). At week 50, improvements in productivity and SF-36 scores were sustained with infliximab. In placebo patients who crossed over to infliximab, these scores improved and approached those seen with infliximab at week 50. Infliximab significantly improved productivity and ability to work in psoriasis patients.     

Scalp discoloration from selenium sulphide: revisiting a report of terra firma-forme dermatosis of the scalp

Background Psoriasis is associated with poor health‐related quality of life, including sleep impairment. Objective To assess the extent of sleep impairment, the effect of adalimumab on sleep and other patient‐reported outcomes, and correlations between changes in these outcomes and sleep quality in patients with psoriasis. Methods Patients in the 16‐week, open‐label, Phase IIIb PROGRESS trial had chronic plaque psoriasis and suboptimal response to prior therapy (etanercept, methotrexate or narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy). Adalimumab was self‐injected subcutaneously (80 mg at week 0, then 40 mg every other week from week 1). The focus for this analysis was the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale. Other patient‐reported outcomes included the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Physician’s Global Assessment, a visual analogue scale for psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (PsA) pain, and the Work Productivity and Activity Index Questionnaire‐Specific Health Problems. Results Patients with psoriasis had impaired sleep at baseline. The degree of sleep impairment was significantly associated with the extent of work productivity for all sleep measures and, for some sleep measures, was associated with DLQI impairment, clinical severity measured by PASI, the presence of PsA, and depression. Adalimumab treatment significantly improved sleep quality by 15% from baseline, as well as DLQI score, pain and work productivity. The improvement in sleep was partially explained (R² = 0·16, P < 0·001) by improvements in the objectively measured psoriasis signs in PASI. Conclusions Adalimumab treatment improved sleep outcomes and other patient‐reported outcomes including health‐related quality of life, work productivity, daily activity and disease‐related pain.     

Treatment of severe recalcitrant plaque psoriasis with single-dose intravenous tumour necrosis factor-alpha antibody (infliximab)

Infliximab is a chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha antibody that has been demonstrated to have marked efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis. Seven patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were treated with single-dose intravenous infliximab (5 mg/kg), and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Questionnaire Index (DLQI) were used as a measure of treatment efficacy. There was an average improvement in PASI scores of 69% at 2 weeks post infusion. There was an improvement in DLQI of 61%. Four of the seven patients were also seen at 10 weeks post infusion and the improvement in PASI and DLQI was sustained. All patients tolerated the initial infusion well without adverse events. The results indicate that single-dose infliximab is an effective and efficacious therapy for recalcitrant psoriasis and has a prolonged therapeutic effect.     

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of psoriasis: a Phase 2b randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging study

Background Tofacitinib is a novel, oral Janus kinase inhibitor under investigation as a potential treatment for plaque psoriasis. Objectives This Phase 2b, 12‐week, dose‐ranging study (A3921047, NCT00678210) aimed to characterize the exposure–response, efficacy and safety of tofacitinib vs. placebo in patients with moderate‐to‐severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Methods One hundred and ninety‐seven patients were randomized. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 75% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) score at week 12. Results At week 12, PASI 75 response rates were significantly higher for all tofacitinib twice‐daily groups: 25·0% (2 mg; P < 0·001), 40·8% (5 mg; P < 0·0001) and 66·7% (15 mg; P < 0·0001), compared with placebo (2·0%). Significant increases in the proportion of PASI 75 responses were seen by week 4 and were maintained at week 12. Exposure–response over the 0–15 mg tofacitinib twice‐daily dose range was successfully characterized. PASI 50, PASI 90 and Physician’s Global Assessment response rates were also higher for tofacitinib vs. placebo. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were infections and infestations: 22·4% (2 mg twice daily), 20·4% (5 mg twice daily), 36·7% (15 mg twice daily) and 32·0% (placebo). Discontinuations due to AEs were 6·0%, 2·0%, 4·1% and 6·1% of patients in the placebo, and 2, 5 and 15 mg twice‐daily tofacitinib groups, respectively. Dose‐dependent increases from baseline in mean serum high‐density lipoprotein, low‐density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, and decreases in haemoglobin and neutrophils were observed. Conclusion Short‐term treatment with oral tofacitinib results in significant clinical improvement in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis and is generally well tolerated.     

Safety and efficacy of alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept and infliximab in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background The relatively recent introduction of biological agents to treat psoriasis presents clinicians with the need to objectively compare and contrast these agents to allow more effective treatment of their patients. Objectives To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of biological agents in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Methods (i) Data sources: Four parallel systematic reviews conducted through July 2006, including peer‐reviewed data and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports. (ii) Study selection: Randomized, controlled, double‐blind, monotherapy trials of alefacept (n = 3), efalizumab (n = 5), etanercept (n = 4) and infliximab (n = 4); 16 studies comprising 7931 patients met inclusion criteria. (iii) Data extraction: Efficacy was measured by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 achievement after 10–14 weeks of treatment, using intention‐to‐treat analysis. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of one or more adverse event(s) (AEs) and serious adverse event(s) (SAEs) during 10–30 weeks of treatment. Results Pooled relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT) of PASI 75 achievement compared with placebo was computed using Mantel–Haenszel methods and the random effects model. All biological agents for psoriasis were efficacious (P < 0·001); however, there was a graded response for achievement of PASI 75: infliximab (RR = 17·40, NNT = 2), etanercept (RR = 11·73, NNT = 3), efalizumab (RR = 7·34, NNT = 4) and alefacept (RR = 3·70, NNT = 8). The risk of one or more AEs was evaluated by RR and number needed to harm (NNH). This was increased in the alefacept (RR = 1·09, P = 0·03, NNH = 15), efalizumab (RR = 1·15, P < 0·001, NNH = 9) and infliximab (RR = 1·18, P < 0·001, NNH = 9) groups compared with placebo. SAEs were increased in a sensitivity analysis of four efalizumab trials (n = 2443, RR = 1·92, P = 0·03, NNH = 60). Conclusions The decreasing rank order for pooled efficacy was infliximab, etanercept, efalizumab and alefacept when compared with placebo. Pooling safety data revealed a previously unreported increased risk of AEs for alefacept, efalizumab and infliximab.     

Long-term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 1 trial through up to 3 years

Background An unmet need remains for safe and effective long‐term treatments of psoriasis. Objectives To evaluate ustekinumab efficacy and safety for up to 3 years in the PHOENIX 1 trial. Methods Patients (n = 766) with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis were randomized to ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg at weeks 0 and 4, and then every 12 weeks, or placebo at weeks 0 and 4, with crossover to ustekinumab at week 12. Ustekinumab responders [≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at weeks 28 and 40] were re‐randomized at week 40 to continue or withdraw from treatment until psoriasis recurrence. Partial responders (week 28: PASI 50–74; week 40: < PASI 75) switched to dosing every 8 weeks. Clinical efficacy was assessed by PASI, the Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) measures. Results Overall, 79·8% of the ustekinumab‐treated patients remained in the study for 3 years. PASI 75 response rates (45 mg: 61·2%; 90 mg: 72·4%) at week 76 were maintained through year 3 (45 mg: 62·7%; 90 mg: 72·2%); PGA response was similarly durable. At year 3, 80·9% (45 mg) and 82·7% (90 mg) of week 40 responders continuing treatment every 12 weeks achieved a PASI 75 response, while 42·6% (45 mg) and 58·0% (90 mg) achieved a PASI 90 response. Among partial responders adjusted to dosing every 8 weeks, 50·9% (45 mg) and 52·0% (90 mg) had a PASI 75 response at year 3. DLQI responses paralleled the PASI responses. Through year 3, no dose response was observed in rates of adverse events (AEs), overall infections, serious AEs, or AEs leading to discontinuation; nor was there evidence of cumulative organ toxicity. Conclusions Continuous, stable, maintenance dosing with ustekinumab was generally well tolerated and sustained durable efficacy for up to 3 years of treatment.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the addition of methotrexate to etanercept in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis

Background Etanercept plus methotrexate combination therapy has not been adequately investigated in psoriasis. Objectives To evaluate etanercept plus methotrexate vs. etanercept monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who had not failed prior methotrexate or tumour necrosis factor‐inhibitor therapy. Methods Patients received etanercept 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks followed by 50 mg once weekly for 12 weeks and were randomized 1 : 1 to receive methotrexate (7·5–15 mg weekly) or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 24. Results In total, 239 patients were enrolled in each arm. PASI 75 was significantly higher at week 24 for the combination therapy group compared with the monotherapy group (77·3% vs. 60·3%; P < 0·0001). Other PASI improvement scores at week 12 [PASI 75, 70·2% vs. 54·3% (P = 0·01); PASI 50, 92·4% vs. 83·8% (P = 0·01); and PASI 90, 34·0% vs. 23·1% (P = 0·03)] showed similar results as did week 24 PASI 50 (91·6% vs. 84·6%; P = 0·01) and PASI 90 (53·8% vs. 34·2%; P = 0·01). Significantly more patients receiving combination therapy than monotherapy had static Physician’s Global Assessment of clear/almost clear at week 12 (65·5% vs. 47·0%; P = 0·01) and week 24 (71·8% vs. 54·3%; P = 0·01). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 74·9% and 59·8% of combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively; three serious AEs were reported in each arm. Conclusions Combination therapy with etanercept plus methotrexate had acceptable tolerability and increased efficacy compared with etanercept monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.     

Ustekinumab does not increase body mass index in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: a prospective cohort study

Background Chronic plaque psoriasis is frequently associated with metabolic disorders including obesity. Antitumour necrosis factor α treatments can induce body‐weight increase in patients with psoriasis. Information on the effect of ustekinumab on body weight is not available. Objectives To investigate whether therapy with ustekinumab is associated with changes in body mass index (BMI) in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Methods A prospective, multicentre study comparing the changes in BMI in two closed cohorts of patients with psoriasis during 7‐month treatment with ustekinumab (n = 79) or infliximab (n = 83). Results Patients treated for 7 months with infliximab showed a significant (P < 0·001) increase in mean BMI (2·1 ± 4·5%) and body weight (2·5 ± 3·3 kg) compared with patients treated with ustekinumab (0·1 ± 3·3%; 0·6 ± 1·1 kg). Some 45% of patients treated with infliximab had a BMI increase > 2%, compared with only 11% of those receiving ustekinumab (P = 0·01). In the multivariate analysis, all other clinical parameters predicted the BMI increase, except for the use of infliximab. At month 7, 96% of patients treated with infliximab and 82% of patients treated with ustekinumab achieved at least a 50% improvement from their baseline psoriasis area and severity index (PASI 50), and 69% of the infliximab group compared with 58% of the ustekinumab group achieved at least PASI 75. There was no difference in the proportion of PASI 50 and PASI 75 responders between the two groups. Conclusions In contrast to infliximab, ustekinumab does not increase BMI in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. This difference could be taken into account in the selection of biologics when treating patients with psoriasis.     

Efficacy and safety of briakinumab vs. etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis

Background The anti‐interleukin‐12/23p40 monoclonal antibody briakinumab has been shown in a phase II study to be effective psoriasis treatment. Objectives The aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of briakinumab compared with etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Methods In this phase III, 12‐week study (M10‐114, NCT00691964), 347 patients were randomized in a 2 : 2 : 1 ratio to receive 200 mg briakinumab at weeks 0 and 4 followed by 100 mg briakinumab at week 8 (n = 138); 50 mg of etanercept twice weekly 3–4 days apart at weeks 0–11 (n = 141); or placebo injections matching active treatment (n = 68). The co ‐ primary efficacy endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving a Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) of 0/1 at week 12, and the proportion of patients achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 response at week 12. Results Of the briakinumab‐treated patients, 71·0% achieved a PGA of 0/1 at week 12 as compared with 39·7% of etanercept‐treated patients and 2·9% of placebo‐treated patients, (P < 0·001, for both comparisons). Of the briakinumab‐treated patients 81·9% achieved a PASI 75 response at week 12 as compared with 56·0% of etanercept‐treated and 7·4% of placebo‐treated patients (P < 0·001, for both comparisons). Serious adverse event rates were reported in four (2·9%) patients receiving briakinumab, one (0·7%) patient receiving etanercept and one (1·5%) placebo‐treated patient. Conclusions In patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, briakinumab had superior efficacy to both placebo and etanercept at 12 weeks as administered in this study.     

Once weekly administration of etanercept 50 mg is efficacious and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a randomized controlled trial with open-label extension

Background In previous studies, etanercept 25 mg twice weekly (BIW) or 50 mg BIW significantly reduced disease severity in patients with plaque psoriasis and demonstrated a favourable safety profile. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of etanercept 50 mg administered once weekly (QW) compared with placebo in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis over 24 weeks. Methods This study was conducted in two parts: (i) a 12‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase, in which patients received etanercept 50 mg QW or placebo QW; and (ii) a 12‐week, open‐label extension phase, in which all patients received etanercept 50 mg QW. Primary endpoint was a 75% or greater improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 12. Secondary endpoints included percentage PASI improvement and Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA). Results One hundred and forty‐two patients were analysed in the double‐blind phase; 126 patients entered the open‐label phase. At week 12, significantly more patients receiving etanercept 50 mg QW (37·5%) achieved PASI 75 response than patients receiving placebo (2·2%; P < 0·0001). At week 24, 71·1% in the etanercept–etanercept group and 44·4% in the placebo–etanercept group achieved PASI 75. Mean percentage of PASI improvement from baseline was 55·4% with etanercept vs. 9·4% worsening with placebo at week 12 (P < 0·0001), with 77·4% and 57·7% improvement in the etanercept–etanercept and placebo–etanercept groups at week 24. A PGA score of 0–1 (clear–almost clear) was achieved by 64% and 42% in the etanercept–etanercept and placebo–etanercept groups at week 24, respectively. Etanercept 50 mg QW was well tolerated. No deaths, serious infections, opportunistic infections (including tuberculosis), demyelinating disorders, malignancies or new safety signals were reported. Conclusions Nearly three‐quarters of patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis receiving etanercept 50 mg QW achieved significant improvement in disease severity over 24 weeks. This study also showed a favourable tolerability and safety profile with etanercept 50 mg QW.