Defining a role for endoscopic ultrasound in staging periampullary tumors

BACKGROUND: The goal of the preoperative workup in patients with suspected periampullary carcinoma is to establish the diagnosis with a high degree of certainty. In this study we compared endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) scans for the detection of tumor, lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion in patients with suspected periampullary carcinoma in order to define a role for EUS in the preoperative staging of these patients. METHODS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients received EUS and CT scanning followed by operation for presumed periampullary carcinoma during a 30-month period. Both imaging modalities were reviewed in a blinded fashion and the results compared with pathology and operative reports on all patients. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for tumor detection by EUS were 97%, 33%, 94%, and 50%, respectively, compared with 82%, 66%, 97%, and 25% for CT scan. For lymph nodes the values were 21%, 80%, 57%, and 44%, respectively, for EUS compared with 42%, 73%, 67%, and 50% for CT. For vascular invasion, the values were 20%, 100%, 100%, and 89%, respectively, for EUS, compared with 80%, 87%, 44%, and 96% for CT. CONCLUSIONS: CT is the initial study of choice in patients with suspected periampullary tumors. EUS is superior for detecting tumor and for predicting vascular invasion. Therefore, EUS should be used for patients in whom CT does not detect a mass and for those with an identifiable mass on CT in whom vascular invasion cannot be ruled out.     

Prospective Analysis of Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography,Computed Tomography,and Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Staging of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction

Background: Exact preoperative staging of esophageal cancer is essential for accurate prognosis and selection of appropriate treatment modalities.Methods: Forty-two patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or the esophagogastric junction suitable for radical esophageal resection were staged with positron emission tomography (PET), spiral computed tomography (CT), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).Results: Diagnostic sensitivity for the primary tumor was 83% for PET and 67% for CT; for local peritumoral lymph node metastasis, it was 37% for PET and 89% for EUS; and for distant metastasis, it was 47% for PET and 33% for CT. Diagnostic specificity for local lymph node metastasis was 100% with PET and 54% with EUS, and for distant metastasis, it was 89% for PET and 96% for CT. Accuracy for locoregional lymph node metastasis was 63% for PET, 66% for CT, and 75% for EUS, and for distant metastasis, it was 74% with PET and 74% with CT. Of the 10 patients who were considered inoperable during surgery, PET identified 7 and CT 4. The false-negative diagnoses of stage IV disease in PET were peritoneal carcinomatosis in two patients, abdominal para-aortic cancer growth in one, metastatic lymph nodes by the celiac artery in four, and metastases in the pancreas in one. PET showed false-positive lymph nodes at the jugulum in three patients.Conclusions: The diagnostic value of PET in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction is limited because of low accuracy in staging of paratumoral and distant lymph nodes. PET does, however, seem to detect organ metastases better than CT.     

Is a preoperative multidiagnostic approach to predict surgical resectability of periampullary tumors still effective?

BACKGROUND: Multimodality staging is recommended in patients with periampullary tumors to optimize preoperative determination of resectability. We investigated the potency of currently used diagnostic procedures in order to determine resectability. METHODS: Ninety-five consecutive patients with periampullary tumors prehospitally staged resectable underwent preoperative diagnostic tests: helical-computed tomography (CT) with maximum intensity projection of arterial vessels (MIP), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and positron emission tomography (PET). Diagnoses were verified by surgery and histopathology. RESULTS: In 45 patients with benign and 50 patients with malignant periampullary tumors sensitivity for tumor diagnosis was 89% to 96% in CT, MRI, EUS, and PET. Small tumors were best diagnosed by EUS (100%). Diagnosis of malignancy was made with 85% (EUS), 83% (CT), 82% (PET), and 72% (MRI) accuracy. Arterial vessel infiltration was best predicted by CT/MIP with an accuracy of 85%. For venous vessel infiltration MRI reached 85% accuracy. Accuracy rates for local nonresectability were 93% (EUS), 92% (MRI), and 90% (CT). Two and 4 of 8 patients with distant metastases were identified by CT and PET, respectively. The correct diagnosis of malignancy and determination of resectability was made by CT in 71% and by MRI in 70%. Biliary stenting reduced accuracy of CT diagnosis of malignancy from 88% to 73%. CONCLUSIONS: CT obtained before stenting was the single most useful test, providing correct diagnosis in 88% and resectability in 71% of patients. If no tumor is depicted in CT, EUS should be added. Uncertain venous vessel infiltration can be verified by MRI or EUS. Angiography should no longer be a routine diagnostic procedure. Equivocal tumors or possible metastasis may be further examined with PET.     

Dynamic CT in the Preoperative Evaluation of Patients With Gastric Cancer: Correlation With Surgical Findings and Pathology

Background: The use of diagnostic techniques in the preoperative staging of patients with gastric cancer must be better defined. To further clarify which technique is indicated, we applied a new modality of computed tomography (CT) scanning for patients with gastric cancer.Methods: Dynamic CT of the abdomen using water as oral contrast agent was performed in 30 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients without evidence of metastatic disease underwent exploratory laparotomy and intraoperative staging. Resectable patients had surgical excision and definitive pathologic staging.Results: Two patients (7%) had metastatic disease by CT and were considered inoperable. The remaining 28 underwent laparotomy. Of these, six (21%) were unresectable and 22 (79%) had surgical resection. Dynamic CT adequately suggested advanced stage disease in four (67%) of the 6 unresectable patients. Wall thickness in dynamic CT correlated with the risk of serosal involvement (P < .001). Both CT and surgery had an accuracy of 64% (P > .05) in predicting pathologic staging. CT overstaged only 4% of cases.Conclusions: Dynamic CT is a useful modality that can indicate inoperable disease, obviating the need for laparotomy in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. CT can modify the surgical approach by suggesting unresectable or advanced disease. The low percentage of patients that are overstaged by CT, combined with its similar staging accuracy when compared with laparotomy, support its preoperative use in these patients.     

Efficacy of 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasonography compared with conventional ultrasonography and computed tomography in preoperative rectal cancer staging

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to verify reports of the decreased accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) in preoperative staging of rectal cancer, and to compare the efficacy of 3-dimensional (3D) EUS with that of 2-dimensional (2D) EUS and computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Eighty-six consecutive rectal cancer patients undergoing curative surgery were evaluated by 2D EUS, 3D EUS, and CT scan. RESULTS: The accuracy in T-staging was 78% for 3D EUS, 69% for 2D EUS, and 57% for CT (P < .001-.002), whereas the accuracy in evaluating lymph node metastases was 65%, 56%, and 53%, respectively (P < .001-.006). Examiner errors were the most frequent cause of misinterpretation, occurring in 47% of 2D EUS examinations and in 65% of 3D EUS examinations. By eliminating examiner errors, the accuracy rates in T-staging and lymph node evaluation could be improved to 88% and 76%, respectively, for 2D EUS, and to 91% and 90%, respectively, for 3D EUS. Conical protrusions along the deep tumor border on 3D images were correlated closely with infiltration grade, advanced T-stage, and lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: We found that 3D EUS showed greater accuracy than 2D EUS or CT in rectal cancer staging and lymph node metastases. Concrete 3D images based on tumor biology appear to provide more accurate information on tumor progression.     

Clinical utility of positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and management of periampullary neoplasms

Background This study examined the effect that 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET) imaging had on the clinical management of patients with suspected periampullary malignancy. Methods Fifty-four patients with suspected pancreatic neoplasms underwent both whole-body¹⁸FDG-PET and abdominal computed tomography (CT). Malignant or benign disease was confirmed pathologically in 47 patients. Results Of the 41 patients with malignancy,¹⁸FDG-PET failed to identify the primary tumor in 5 patients.¹⁸FDG-PET demonstrated increased uptake suggesting primary malignancy in 37 patients. Malignant pathology was confirmed in 36 cases.¹⁸FDG-PET identified malignant locoregional lymph node metastases in six of ten patients. All nodes identified before surgery by¹⁸FDG-PET were also seen on preoperative CT. Six patients who were thought to have resectable disease by CT were found to have distant metastasis at laparotomy.¹⁸FDG-PET did not detect metastasis in any of these cases. Before surgery,¹⁸FDG-PET identified distant metastases that were not detected by CT in one patient. Conclusions Despite high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing periampullary malignancy,¹⁸FDG-PET did not change clinical management in the vast majority of patients previously evaluated by CT. In addition,¹⁸FDG-PET missed>10% of periampullary malignancies and did not provide the anatomical detail necessary to define unresectability.     

Low impact of staging EUS for determining surgical resectability in esophageal cancer

Background

Although studies have shown that EUS has a high sensitivity and specificity for T and N staging, the value of EUS for staging tumors as resectable or nonresectable after CT of the chest and abdomen and US neck assessment, is largely unknown. This study was designed to assess the diagnostic value of EUS for determining resectability of esophageal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent staging EUS, CT, and US. Tumors were considered resectable when there was no evidence of metastases or ingrowth in adjacent structures. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive value of CT/US neck and CT/US neck?+?EUS for predicting surgical resectability were calculated. PPVs of CT/US alone and CT/US?+?EUS together were compared for assessing the diagnostic value of EUS.

Results

In total, 211 patients (155 men; mean age of 64?±?9.4?years) were included, of which 176 (83?%) underwent all three staging investigations. Based on preoperative staging, 173 (82?%) patients were considered resectable and 38 (18?%) nonresectable. Of all 173 initially resectable patients, 145 were operated on. Of these patients, five (3.4?%) tumors were found nonresectable during surgery. Postoperative sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of CT/US and CT/US?+?EUS for predicting surgical resectability were 88 versus 87?%, 20 versus 40?%, 97 versus 98?%, and 6 versus 10?%, respectively.

Conclusions

Although EUS adds to the specificity of preoperative esophageal cancer staging after CT chest and abdomen, and US of the neck have been performed, the overall added value of EUS is limited.     

Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction: Positron Emission Tomography Improves Staging and Prediction of Survival in Distant but Not in Locoregional Disease

In adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for prognostication and treatment allocation, one prerequisite is accurate pretreatment staging. This staging, we hypothesized, would be improved by the use of positron emission tomography (PET). After 55 patients suitable for radical esophageal resection were staged with PET, spiral computed tomography (CT), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), results were compared with histopathology and with survival. Accuracy in detecting locoregional lymph node metastasis did not differ significantly between EUS (72%), PET (60%), and CT (58%). Adding PET to standard staging failed to improve the accuracy of N staging (P = 0.250). In M staging, accuracy between CT (75%) and PET (76%) did not differ. The accuracy of combined studies of CT and PET and of EUS, CT, and PET were 87% (P = 0.016 versus CT) and 91% (P = 0.031 versus EUS and CT), respectively. Of the 55 patients, 19 (35%) had metastatic lesions. By combined use of CT and EUS and by combined use of CT, EUS, and PET, 8 and 14 (P = 0.031), respectively, could be detected. In nodal disease without distant metastases, PET did not improve the prediction of survival. However, positive PET for distant metastasis by either positive EUS or CT predicts well the poor survival of these patients. The staging value of PET by itself in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is limited because of low accuracy for nodal and the lack of specificity for distant disease prognosis. Adding PET to standard staging does, however, improve detection of stage IV disease and its associated poor survival. Presented at the Forty-Fifth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 15–19, 2004 (poster presentation).     

The Value of Modern Ultrasonographic Techniques and Computed Tomography in Detecting and Staging of Pancreatic Carcinoma

Objective : to assess the clinical value of ultrasonographic methods and computed tomography in diagnosing and staging pancreatic carcinoma.

Methods : prospective clinical trial of 140 patients (64 women and 77 men; mean age 59,6) operated on for pancreatic carcinoma between 2000 and 2004. In each case helical CT, routine-, color-and power Doppler and 3-D USG were performed to detect and stage cancer. Analyses of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of ultrasonographic methods and CT were made.

Results : 3-D USG showed the best accuracy of local staging (T): 95.6%. CT was the most accurate in lymph node assessment: 91.3%. The accuracy of CT, 3-D USG and power-Doppler at detecting vascular infiltration was 93.1%. Conclusions : diagnostic accuracy of modern ultrasound techniques is comparable to helical CT in detecting and staging pancreatic carcinoma. USG is recommended due to the relatively low cost, non-invasiveness and availability of the procedure.     

Medullary carcinoma of the thyroid: Prognostic factors and treatment recommendations

Background: Because medullary thyroid carcinoma accounts for only 7% of all thyroid malignancies, data to support treatment strategies are scarce. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed treatment and outcome in 34 patients with MTC treated at Roswell Park between 1961 and 1995. Univariate analysis was performed using the variables age, sex, tumor size, N stage, and M stage. Results: Median survival was 4.7 years, with 51% and 32% of patients alive at 5 and 15 years, respectively. Nodal metastases were seen in 76% and distant metastases in 67% of all patients. More than 60% of the patients with nodal metastases survived longer than 10 years. Once diagnosed with distant metastases, 90% of the patients died within 5 years. Local failure rate with lobectomy was 44%, compared to 10% after total thyroidectomy (P<.02). Age, extrathyroid extension, and M stage portend a poor outcome. Nodal status had no statistically significant impact on survival. Conclusion: Survival with tumors confined to the thyroid gland is independent of nodal status. Long-term survival in patients with distant metastases is rare. This study underscores the role of total thyroidectomy in the initial treatment and the need to develop effective adjuvant therapy for MTC.Presented at the 50th Annual Cancer Symposium of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Chicago, Illinois, March 20–23, 1997.     

Is laparoscopic sonography a reliable and sensitive procedure for staging colorectal cancer?

Background: Laparoscopic colectomy has developed rapidly with the explosion of technology. In most cases, laparoscopic resection is performed for colorectal cancer. Intraoperative staging during laparoscopic procedure is limited. Laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) represents the only real alternative to manual palpation during laparoscopic surgery. Methods: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in comparison with preoperative staging and laparoscopy in 33 patients with colorectal cancer. Preoperative staging included abdominal US, CT, and endoscopic US (for rectal cancer). Laparoscopy and LUS were performed in all cases. Pre- and intraoperative staging were related to definitive histology. Staging was done according to the TNM classification. Results: LUS obtained good results in the evaluation of hepatic metastases, with a sensitivity of 100% versus 62.5% and 75% by preoperative diagnostic means and laparoscopy, respectively. Nodal metastases were diagnosed with a sensitivity of 94% versus 18% with preoperative staging and 6% with laparoscopy, but the method had a low specificity (53%). The therapeutic program was changed thanks to laparoscopy and LUS in 11 cases (33%). In four cases (12%), the planned therapeutic approach was changed after LUS alone. Conclusions: The results obtained in this study demonstrate that LUS is an accurate and highly sensitive procedure in staging colorectal cancer, providing a useful and reliable diagnostic tool complementary to laparoscopy. Received: 2 May 1997/Accepted: 11 February 1998     

The value of endoscopic ultrasonography in predicting resectability and margins of resection for periampullary tumors

Cure of pancreatic head and other periampullary neoplasms continues to be infrequent and is unattainable unless clear surgical margins are achieved during Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a relatively recent gastrointestinal tumor imaging modality and may be superior to other techniques used in locoregional staging. We hypothesized that EUS can accurately predict not only tumor resectability, but also negative resection margins with Whipple resection. A retrospective review was undertaken of 81 consecutive patients with periampullary tumors who underwent preoperative CT and EUS followed by surgical exploration for intended Whipple resection. Correlations among preoperative EUS results, successful resection, and surgical margins on final histopathology were investigated. Of the 81 patients, 61 (75%) underwent successful Whipple resection, and 20 (25%) were found to be unresectable at laparotomy. Resection was achieved in 57 (86%) of 66 patients predicted to be resectable by EUS. Of the 61 resected patients, 52 (85%) had negative margins and nine (15%) had positive margins on final pathology. Margins were determined to be negative in 50 (88%) of 57 resected patients predicted to have negative margins by EUS. We conclude that EUS is a powerful and desirable imaging modality in the preoperative assessment of periampullary neoplasms.     

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan compared to CT-scan alone for lymph node staging before radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer

BackgroundAccurate Lymph node (LN) staging before radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with bladder cancer (BC) is crucial to improve patient's management. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) become widely used in the loco-regional staging of BC. The diagnostic performance of PET-CT in preoperative LN staging of BC is still unknown due to lacking large trials.ObjectivesWe aim to evaluate the diagnostic value of PET-CT scan, compared with CT scan alone for preoperative LN staging of BC.Patients and methodsFrom January 2010 to November 2020, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 300 patients undergoing RC for muscle-invasive BC and high-risk non-muscle-invasive BC. All patients had PET-CT and CT of abdomen and pelvis to assess for pelvic LN metastases before RC. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting pelvic LN metastases were determined by comparing the results of the FDG PET-CT and CT alone to the final histopathology reports obtained after RC.ResultsLN metastasis was confirmed histology in 134 patients (44.7%). On a patient-based analysis, PET–CT, and CT showed a sensitivity of 40.3% and 13.4 %, respectively, a specificity of 79.5% and 86.7 %, respectively, positive predictive value (PPV) of 61.4% and 45%, respectively, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 62.3% and 55.4%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of PET-CT scan depends on multiple preoperative and postoperative factors.ConclusionPET-CT is more accurate than CT-scan alone for preoperative LN staging in patients with BC.     

Endoscopic Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Predictors of Pancreatic Cancer Resectability

Introduction This study investigates the ability of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) to predict a margin negative (R0) resection and the need for venous resection in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods Patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma undergoing surgery with intent to resect during the last 5 years were identified. EUS and CT data on vascular involvement were collected. Preoperative imaging was compared to intraoperative findings and final pathology. Contingency table analysis using Fisher’s exact test identified imaging features of EUS and CT associated with unresectability and positive margins. Results Seventy-six patients met study criteria. Forty-seven (62%) underwent potentially curative PD. The R0 resection rate was 70%. There were 16 unresectable patients because of locally advanced disease. Venous involvement >180° and arterial involvement >90° by CT had 100% positive predictive value for failure to achieve R0 resection (p < .01). If patients with prestudy biliary stents were excluded, EUS venous abutment or invasion also predicted R0 failure (p = .02). Combined but not individual EUS and CT findings were predictive of need for vein resection. Conclusions Pancreas protocol CT imaging appears to be a better predictor of resectability compared to EUS. EUS accuracy is affected by the presence of biliary stents. This article was presented at SSAT, Washington DC, May 2007.     

Diagnostic performance of the FDG-PET/CT in patients with resected mucinous colorectal liver metastases

Backgroundand purpose: FDG-PET/CT has gained acceptance for tumours staging. Few and conflicting data exist on the sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT in identifying colorectal mucinous liver metastases (mucCRLM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the FDG-PET/CT in patients with mucCRLM who underwent liver surgery.MethodsAll patients affected by mucCRLM scheduled for liver resection who had undergone preoperative FDG-PET/CT between 2005 and 2018 were analyzed. Diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT was assessed in organ and lesion-based analysis.Results58 patients out of 131 (44.2%) affected by mucCRLM fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 118 mucCRLM were detected. FDG-PET/CT confirmed 71 (60.2%) CRLM in 51 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT were 89.4% and 100% in the organ-based analysis and 60.7% and 100% in lesion-based analysis. Absence of micro-vascular invasion (100% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) and median percentage of viable tumour cells were associated with FDG-PET/CT false negative (15% vs. 60%, p = 0.007). At ROC analysis viable tumour cells percentage >25% was associated with low risk of false negative (AUC 0.848; p = 0.006).ConclusionsFDG-PET/CT had a significant rate of false negative results in patients with mucinous colorectal liver metastases. Negative FDG-PET/CT in patients with low percentage of viable tumour cells after chemotherapy should be considered with caution.     

Clinical usefulness of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with nonpancreatic periampullary neoplasms

BACKGROUND: 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18-FDG PET) has been investigated for the diagnosis and staging of gastrointestinal malignancies including pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical usefulness of 18-FDG PET in the diagnosis and follow-up evaluation of patients with periampullary neoplasms. METHODS: Twenty-five patients underwent whole-body 18-FDG PET and abdominal computed tomography (CT). Pathologic confirmation was obtained in all patients by surgical resection or biopsy examination. The 18-FDG PET was analyzed visually and semiquantitatively using the standard uptake value (SUV). Positivity was assumed when a focal uptake occurred with an SUV of 2.5 or greater. RESULTS: Between January 1998 and December 2003, 14 ampullary, 7 bile duct, and 4 duodenal tumors were included in the study. PET showed increased focal uptake in 22 patients (88%): 11 of 14 (79%) ampullary tumors, and 100% of bile duct and duodenal tumors. PET showed a focal uptake in 11 of 12 patients without detectable mass at CT scan, and lymph node metastases in 6 patients. An SUV value of 2.7 discriminated adenomas or noninvasive cancers (n = 6) from invasive malignancies (n = 14). Follow-up evaluation including CT scan and PET was performed in 12 patients: PET showed recurrent disease not seen by CT in 4 patients, confirmed CT findings in 6 patients, and showed an unsuspected primary lung cancer in 1 patient and colon cancer in another patient. CONCLUSIONS: 18-FDG PET is very sensitive for detecting periampullary neoplasms. It may be useful to differentiate benign or borderline lesions from invasive tumors when no mass has been identified by traditional imaging. Finally, it is very useful in the follow-up evaluation of resected patients to identify recurrent disease or other malignancies.     

TNM staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer by laparoscopic ultrasonography

Background: Laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) is an imaging modality that combines laparoscopy and ultrasonography. The purpose of this prospective blinded study was to evaluate the TNM stage and assessment of resectability by LUS in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: Of the 71 consecutive patients admitted to our department, 36 were excluded from the study, mainly due to evident signs of metastatic disease or another condition that would preclude surgery. Thus, a total of 35 patients were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent abdominal CT scan, ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), diagnostic laparoscopy, and LUS. Histopathologic examination was considered to be the final evaluation for LUS in all but three patients, where EUS was used as the reference. Results: The accuracy of LUS in T staging was 29/33 (80%); in N staging it was 22/34 (76%); in M staging, it was 23/34 (68%); and in overall TNM staging, it was 23/34 (68%). In assessment of nonresectability, distant metastases, and lymph node metastases, the sensitivity was 0.86, 0.43 and 0.67, respectively, for LUS alone. Combining the information gleaned from laparoscopy and LUS, the accuracy in finding nonresectable tumors was 89%. Conclusions: Diagnostic laparoscopy with LUS is highly accurate in TNM staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer and should be considered an important modality in the assessment algorithm. Received: 6 July 1998/Accepted: 13 October 1998     

Is CT angiography sufficient for prediction of resectability of periampullary neoplasms?

The optimal preoperative evaluation of periampullary neoplasms remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy of helical computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction in predicting resectability. Between March 1996 and May 1999, a total of 100 patients with periampullary neoplasms were prospectively staged by helical CT and CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction. Vascular involvement was graded from 0 to 4, with grade 0 representing no vascular involvement and grade 4 total encasement of either the superior mesenteric vein or artery. Patients with grade 4 lesions were considered unresectable. Sixty-eight patients underwent surgical exploration with intent to perform a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Forty-four lesions were grade 0, five were grade 1, eight were grade 2, and 11 were grade 3. Resectability for grades 0 to 3 was 96%, l00%, 50%, and 9%, respectively, for an overall resectability rate of 76%. Resectability in patients with vascular encroachment (grade 2) is usually determined by the extent of local disease rather than the presence of extrapancreatic disease. Resection is rarely possible in patients with evidence of vascular encasement (grade 3). Additional imaging modalities such as diagnostic laparoscopy are superfluous in patients with no evidence of local vascular involvement on CT angiography (grades 0 and 1) because of the high resectability rate and infrequency of unsuspected distant metastatic deposits.     

Diagnostic laparoscopy for periampullary and pancreatic cancer: What is the true benefit?

The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with periampullary and pancreatic malignancies is controversial. A retrospective review was performed including all patients (n = 188) with a periampullary or pancreatic malignancy who underwent both CT and laparotomy at our institution between January 1997 and December 1999. The overall resectability rate for all periampullary cancers was 67.3% (115 of 171 patients). This compared favorably with the resectability rate for cancers of the pancreatic body and tail (3 of 17 patients, 17.6%; P < 0.01 vs. periampullary cancers). Fifty percent of patients with periampullary cancers were unresectable because of metastatic disease, whereas metastatic disease precluded resection in 64.3% of patients with cancers of the pancreatic body and tail. After patients undergoing operative palliation were eliminated, a nontherapeutic laparotomy would have been precluded by the use of diagnostic laparoscopy in only 2.3% of patients with periampullary cancers (4 of 171 patients). In contrast, 6 (35.3%) of 17 patients with cancers of the pancreatic body and tail underwent a nontherapeutic laparotomy (P < 0.01 vs. periampullary cancers). One hundred fifty-eight (84%) of the 188 CT reports reviewed could be definitively categorized as either “likely to be resectable” or “likely to be unresectable.” The remaining 16% were equivocal. Of the 107 patients categorized as likely to be resectable, 89 were actually resected (83.2%). In contrast, only 10 of the 51 patients categorized as likely to be unresectable could be resected (19.6%). Presented at the 2001 Meeting of the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Miami Beach, Fla., Feb. 24, 2001.     

Endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma

Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is potentially the best method for pretreatment staging of esophageal carcinoma once distant metastases have been excluded by other methods. However, its apparent accuracy might be influenced by the use of neoadjuvant therapy. To determine the accuracy of EUS in patients undergoing esophageal resection, the authors reviewed their experience with EUS. Methods A total of 73 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent an esophagectomy between April 2000 and February 2005 were examined using preoperative EUS and computed tomography (CT). Of these patients, 39 also underwent preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Both EUS and CT scan were used to determine the depth of tumor penetration (T-stage) and the presence of lymph node metastases (N-stage). These results then were compared with staging determined after pathologic examination of the resected surgical specimen. Results For patients not undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, T-stage was accurately determined by EUS in 79%, N-stage in 74%, and tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification in 65% of the cases. However, when patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included, the overall accuracy of EUS was 64% for T-stage, 63% for N-stage, and 53% for TNM classification. For the patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy, EUS indicated a more advanced T-stage in 49%, N-stage in 38%, and TNM classification in 51% of the cases, as compared with pathology. The overall accuracy of EUS for T- and N-stage carcinomas was superior to that of CT scanning. Conclusion For patients who do not undergo preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, EUS is a more accurate method for determining T- and N-stage resected esophageal carcinomas. Neoadjuvant therapy, however, results in apparent overstaging, predominantly because of tumor downstaging, and this reduces the apparent accuracy of EUS (and CT scanning) in this patient group. Nevertheless, EUS staging before neoadjuvant therapy could be more accurate than pathologic staging after treatment, thereby providing better initial staging information, which can be used to facilitate treatment.