Rapid detection of mecA-positive and mecA-negative coagulase-negative staphylococci by an anti-penicillin binding protein 2a slide latex agglutination test

A rapid slide latex agglutination (LA) test, MRSA-Screen (Denka Seiken Co., Niigata, Japan), which detects PBP 2a, was tested for its ability to differentiate between mecA-positive and -negative coagulase-negative staphylococci. A total of 463 isolates from 13 species were included in the study. The mecA gene was detected by PCR, and the oxacillin MIC was determined by the agar dilution method according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). The LA test was performed with oxacillin-induced isolates. The true-positive and true-negative results were defined on the basis of the presence or the absence of the mecA gene. By PCR, 251 isolates were mecA positive and 212 were mecA negative. The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values for the LA test compared to the NCCLS breakpoint for oxacillin resistance (>/=0.5 mg/liter) were as follows: for the LA test, 100, 99.5, 99.6, and 100%, respectively; for the NCCLS breakpoint, 100, 60.8, 75.1, and 100%, respectively. One hundred twenty-five mecA-positive isolates were also tested by the LA test without induction of PBP 2a; only 72 (57.6%) gave a positive result and required 3 to 15 min for reaction. With induction, all 251 isolates were positive within 3 min. The LA test was reliable in classifying mecA-negative isolates, but it classified isolates for which the oxacillin MIC was >/=0.5 mg/liter as oxacillin susceptible. For the reliable detection of oxacillin resistance by the MRSA-Screen in coagulase-negative staphylococci, induction of the mecA gene appears to be necessary.     

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Comparison of Susceptibility Testing Methods and Analysis of mecA-Positive Susceptible Strains

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for an increasing number of serious nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Phenotypic heterogeneous drug resistance (heteroresistance) to antistaphylococcal beta-lactams affects the results of susceptibility testing. The present study compared the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for detection of PBP 2a with agar dilution, the VITEK-1 and VITEK-2 systems (bioMérieux, St. Louis, Mo.), and the oxacillin agar screen test for detection of MRSA, with PCR for the mecA gene used as the "gold standard" assay. Analysis of 107 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates and 203 MRSA isolates revealed that the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test is superior to any single phenotype-based susceptibility testing method, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.1%. Only one isolate that lacked mecA was weakly positive by the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test. This isolate was phenotypically susceptible to oxacillin and did not contain the mecA gene by Southern blot hybridization. The oxacillin agar screen test, the VITEK-1 system, the VITEK-2 system, and agar dilution showed sensitivities of 99.0, 99.0, 99.5, and 99%, respectively, and specificities of 98.1, 100, 97.2, and 100%, respectively. The differences in sensitivity or specificity were not statistically significant. Oxacillin bactericidal assays showed that mecA- and PBP 2a-positive S. aureus isolates that are susceptible to antistaphylococcal beta-lactams by conventional methods are functionally resistant to oxacillin. We conclude that the accuracy of the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination method for detection of PBP 2a approaches the accuracy of PCR and is more accurate than any susceptibility testing method used alone for the detection of MRSA.     

Comparison of the Vitek gram-positive susceptibility 106 card, the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test, and mecA analysis for detecting oxacillin resistance in a geographically diverse collection of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci

The Vitek automated susceptibility testing system with a modified gram-positive susceptibility (GPS) 106 card (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood. Mo.) and a rapid slide latex agglutination test (MRSA-Screen test; Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were evaluated for their abilities to detect oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). The reference broth microdilution method and the detection of the mecA gene by PCR ("gold standard" reference result) were used to compare the results obtained with the commercial products. A total of 123 clinical isolates consisting of eight species were selected from U.S. surveillance collections. Among the mecA-positive isolates (95 strains), 30 isolates were initially negative on the MRSA-Screen test read at 3 min. When the agglutination reaction was extended for 10 min, 26 of the 30 isolates became positive. For a different four isolates, the oxacillin MIC was < or =0.25 microg/ml on the Vitek GPS 106 card. Among the mecA-negative isolates (28 strains), for two Staphylococcus warneri, two S. lugdunensis, and two S. saprophyticus strains MICs were > or =0.5 microg/ml by the reference broth microdilution method. Four of these isolates were also categorized as resistant with the Vitek GPS 106 card and two isolates were positive by the MRSA-Screen test. Overall, the MRSA-Screen test, GPS 106 card, and reference broth microdilution method had sensitivities of 95.7 (result at 10 min), 95.7, and 100%, respectively, and specificities of 92.8, 85.7, and 78.5%, respectively. Although the MRSA-Screen test required a slight procedural modification, both commercial methods achieved a sensitivity and specificity at detecting oxacillin resistance in CoNS at a level that was acceptable for clinical laboratory use.     

Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

The MRSA-Screen test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), consisting of a slide latex agglutination kit that detects PBP 2a with a monoclonal antibody, was blindly compared to the oxacillin disk diffusion test, the oxacillin-salt agar screen, and PCR of the mecA gene for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 120 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 80 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates, defined by the absence or presence of the mecA gene, respectively, were tested. The MRSA-Screen test, the oxacillin disk diffusion test, and the oxacillin-salt agar screening test showed sensitivities of 100, 61.3, and 82.5% and specificities of 99.2, 96.7, and 98.3%, respectively. We conclude that the MRSA-Screen is a very accurate, reliable, and fast test (15 min) for differentiation of MRSA from MSSA colonies on agar plates.     

Comparison of the Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility 106 card and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test for determining oxacillin resistance in clinical bloodstream isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

The Vitek automated susceptibility testing system with a modified Gram-Positive Susceptibility (GPS) 106 Card (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) and a rapid slide latex agglutination test (MRSA-Screen; Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were evaluated for their ability to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The oxacillin-salt agar screen (OS) test, the reference broth microdilution method, and the detection of the mecA gene by PCR were compared with the commercial products. A total of 200 contemporary (1999) bloodstream infection isolates were collected from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, representing diverse geographic areas throughout the world. Among the 99 mecA-positive isolates, 3 isolates were found negative by the MRSA-Screen. Another two isolates did not grow on OS plates and had MICs of 0.5 and 2 microg/ml with the Vitek GPS card. All 101 mecA-negative isolates were also found negative by the MRSA-Screen and were categorized as susceptible by the GPS card. Overall, the MRSA-Screen, GPS card, and OS test had sensitivities of 96.9, 98.0, and 98.0% and specificities of 100.0, 100.0, and 98.0%, respectively. MRSA-Screen was a rapid (相似文献   

Evaluation of a Latex Agglutination Test (MRSA-Screen) for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

The MRSA-Screen (Denka-Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) latex agglutination test was evaluated for its ability to detect PBP 2a from 200 clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 84 mecA-positive strains and 116 mecA-negative strains) consisting of 108 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 37 S. saprophyticus, 15 S. haemolyticus, 11 S. hominis, 10 S. capitis, 10 S. warneri, and 3 S. lugdunensis species as well as 6 other species of CoNS. The assay was compared with susceptibility testing with an agar screen plate with oxacillin at 6 microg/ml (OXA6), by oxacillin disk diffusion (DD), by broth microdilution (BMDIL), by the E test, and with Vitek GPS-SV and Vitek GPS-107 susceptibility cards. PCR for the detection of the mecA gene was used as the "gold standard." The sensitivities and specificities for the methods evaluated were as follows: MRSA-Screen, 100 and 100%, respectively; OXA6, 100 and 99%, respectively; DD, 98 and 62%, respectively; BMDIL, 100 and 60%, respectively; E test, 100 and 51%, respectively; Vitek GPS-SV susceptibility card, 98 and 87%, respectively; and Vitek GPS-107 susceptibility card, 100 and 61%, respectively. The MRSA-Screen test accurately and rapidly detected oxacillin resistance in CoNS.     

Performance of eight methods, including two new rapid methods, for detection of oxacillin resistance in a challenge set of Staphylococcus aureus organisms

Using a set of 55 Staphylococcus aureus challenge organisms, we evaluated six routine methods (broth microdilution, disk diffusion, oxacillin agar screen, MicroScan conventional panels, MicroScan rapid panels, and Vitek cards) currently used in many clinical laboratories and two new rapid methods, Velogene and the MRSA-Screen, that require less than a day to determine the susceptibility of S. aureus to oxacillin. The methods were evaluated by using the presence of the mecA gene, as detected by PCR, as the "gold standard." The strains included 19 mecA-positive heterogeneously resistant strains of expression class 1 or 2 (demonstrating oxacillin MICs of 4 to >16 microg/ml) and 36 mecA-negative strains. The oxacillin MICs of the latter strains were 0.25 to 4 microg/ml when tested by broth microdilution with 2% NaCl-supplemented cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth as specified by the NCCLS. However, when tested by agar dilution with 4% salt (the conditions used in the oxacillin agar screen method), the oxacillin MICs of 16 of the mecA-negative strains increased to 4 to 8 microg/ml. On initial testing, the percentages of correct results (% sensitivity/% specificity) were as follows: broth microdilution, 100/100; Velogene, 100/100; Vitek, 95/97; oxacillin agar screen, 90/92; disk diffusion, 100/89; MicroScan rapid panels, 90/86; MRSA-Screen, 90/100; and MicroScan conventional, 74/97. The MRSA-Screen sensitivity improved to 100% if agglutination reactions were read at 15 min. Repeat testing improved the performance of some but not all of the systems.     

Coagulase-negative staphylococci: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic oxacillin susceptibility tests and evaluation of the agar screening test by using different concentrations of oxacillin

This study evaluated the oxacillin susceptibilities of 152 coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) strains of 12 species by disk diffusion; agar dilution; E-test; the slide latex agglutination test (Slidex MRSA Detection test; bioMérieux S/A, Paris, France); the agar screening test with 1, 2, 4, or 6 microg of oxacillin per ml and incubation for 24 or 48 h; and detection of the mecA gene by PCR. The results revealed that the agar screening test with 4 micro g of oxacillin per ml and incubation for 48 h was superior to any single phenotype-based susceptibility assay, presenting a sensitivity and a specificity of 100% each. For the different methods evaluated, the sensitivities and specificities were as follows: for disk diffusion, 94.2 and 91.8%, respectively; for the agar dilution test 100 and 73.5%, respectively; for E-test, 100 and 71.4%, respectively; and for the slide latex agglutination test, 97.1 and 98%, respectively. A good correlation was observed between oxacillin susceptibility testing results and PCR results for Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis subsp. hominis, and all mecA-positive strains. However, at least 60% of the mecA-negative isolates of the species S. saprophyticus, S. cohnii subsp. urealyticum, S. lugdunensis, and S. sciuri were erroneously classified as oxacillin resistant by the agar dilution test. Conversely, the slide latex agglutination test presented a high sensitivity (97.1%) and a high specificity (98%) for all CoNS species. Our results demonstrated the accuracy of the agar screening test with 4 micro g of oxacillin per ml and incubation for 48 h and the slide latex agglutination test for the appropriate detection of the oxacillin susceptibilities of CoNS isolates. Both assays are technically simple and can be easier to perform in routine laboratories than PCR.     

Comparison of phenotypic methods with PCR to screening methicillin resistance in coagulase negative staphylococci

THE AIM OF STUDY: Appreciation of the frequency, the level and the genetic support of methicillin resistance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-three strains of coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from various specimens, from January to June 2004, were studied. The phenotypic detection was carried out by disk diffusion test using oxacillin and cefoxitin disks, by the determination of oxacillin Minimal Inhibitor Concentration (E-test), by the oxacillin screening test at a concentration of 4 mug/ml and by the search of the penicillin binding protein PBP2a using the slide latex agglutination test. The results of these methods were compared to PCR of mecA gene. RESULTS: Forty-eight strains carried mecA gene whose 30 were detected by the oxacillin disk, the cefoxitin disk, the oxacillin screening test, the slide latex agglutination test and had a MIC from 24 to 256 mug/ml. Seventeen strains were not detected by oxacillin disk but by cefoxitin disk and the slide latex agglutination test. Among these strains, 13 (76%) had oxacillin MIC from 0.5 to 1,5 mug/ml and not grew on oxacillin agar screening, while 4 (24%) had oxacillin MIC from 6 to 16 mug/ml and grew on this agar. One strain had oxacillin MIC of 0,19 mug/ml and was not detected with any phenotypic method. CONCLUSION: The determination of oxacillin MIC, the search of the PBP2a or more simply the cefoxitin disk had permitted to detect the strains mecA gene (+) with resistant and pre-resistant phenotype but not the strain with sensible phenotype (2.1%).     

Rapid Slide Latex Agglutination Test for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

The MRSA screen test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd.), a commercially available, rapid (20-min) slide latex agglutination test for the determination of methicillin resistance by detection of PBP 2a in Staphylococcus aureus, was compared with the oxacillin agar screen test and PCR detection of the mecA gene. A total of 563 S. aureus isolates were tested. Two hundred ninety-six of the isolates were methicillin-susceptible isolates from cultures of blood from consecutive patients. Also, 267 methicillin-resistant isolates that comprised 248 different phage types were tested. Methicillin resistance was defined as the presence of the mecA gene. Of the 267 mecA gene-positive isolates, 263 were positive by the MRSA screen test (sensitivity, 98.5%), and all the mecA-gene negative strains were negative by the MRSA screen test (specificity, 100%). The oxacillin agar screen test detected methicillin resistance in 250 of the mecA gene-positive isolates (sensitivity, 93.6%). The sensitivity of the MRSA screen test was statistically significantly higher than the sensitivity of the oxacillin agar screen test (P < 0. 05). The MRSA screen test is a highly sensitive and specific test for the detection of methicillin resistance. Also, it offers results within half an hour and is easy to perform, which makes this test a valuable tool in the ongoing battle against methicillin-resistant S. aureus.     

Evaluation of the MRSA-Screen Test in detecting oxacillin resistance in community and hospital isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

The MRSA-Screen Test (Denka Seiken Co., Japan), a latex agglutination test to detect penicillin-binding protein 2a, was compared with PCR for the detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 77 oxacillin-sensitive and 269 oxacillin-resistant (ORSA) isolates were evaluated. Of the ORSA isolates, 186 were non-multiresistant (NORSA), defined as being resistant to two or fewer antibiotics other than beta-lactams. Eighty-three were multiresistant ORSA (MORSA) strains. If PCR is considered the gold standard test, then the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the MRSA-Screen Test were 100, 99, 99 and 100%, respectively. The endpoint was hard to read with NORSA strains that took longer than 60 s to react. MORSA strains took a median 12 s (range 5-60 s) to give a positive reaction with the MRSA-Screen Test, whereas NORSA strains took a median 30 s (range 5-180 s), a difference which was significantly different (P < 0.0001, two-tailed Mann-Whitney unpaired two sample test). NORSA strains had an MIC50 of 128 mg/l and MIC90 of 256mg/l, whereas MORSA strains had an MIC50 and MIC90 of >256mg/l. The time that the MRSA-Screen Test took to agglutinate with ORSA strains correlated weakly with the MIC (r2 = 0.26). Detection of methicillin resistance cost AUD$9 per isolate with the MRSA-Screen Test, compared with AUD$13 per isolate with mecA PCR. The MRSA-Screen Test gave excellent sensitivity and specificity, and was quicker and cheaper than PCR. The full 3 min should be allowed to elapse before calling a test negative. Organisms giving indeterminate reactions should be tested for the mecA gene by PCR.     

Evaluation of three rapid methods for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

The probe-based Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay (ID Biomedical Corp., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) and the latex agglutination MRSA-Screen (Denka Seiken Co., Tokyo, Japan) were evaluated for their ability to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and to distinguish strains of MRSA from borderline oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (BORSA; mecA-negative, oxacillin MICs of 2 to 8 microgram/ml). The Velogene is a 90-min assay using a chimeric probe to detect the mecA gene. MRSA-Screen is a 15-min latex agglutination test with penicillin-binding protein 2a antibody-sensitized latex particles. We compared these assays with the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) and with PCR for mecA gene detection. A total of 397 clinical isolates of S. aureus were tested, consisting of 164 methicillin-susceptible strains, 197 MRSA strains, and 37 BORSA strains. All assays performed well for the identification of MRSA with sensitivities and specificities for Velogene, MRSA-Screen, and BBL Crystal MRSA ID of 98.5 and 100%, 98.5 and 100%, and 98.5 and 98%, respectively. Three MRSA strains were not correctly identified by each of the Velogene and MRSA-Screen assays, but repeat testing with a larger inoculum resolved the discrepancies. The BBL Crystal MRSA ID test misclassified four BORSA strains as MRSA. Both the Velogene and the MRSA-Screen assays are easy to perform, can accurately differentiate BORSA isolates from MRSA isolates, and provide a rapid alternative for the detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus in clinical laboratories, especially when mecA PCR gene detection is unavailable.     

Evaluation of phenotypic and molecular methods for detection of oxacillin resistance in members of the Staphylococcus sciuri group

In this paper we report on an experimental evaluation of phenotypic and molecular methods as means for the detection of oxacillin resistance in members of the Staphylococcus sciuri group. A total of 109 S. sciuri group member isolates (92 S. sciuri isolates, 9 S. lentus isolates, and 8 S. vitulinus isolates) were tested by the disk diffusion method, the agar dilution method, the oxacillin salt-agar screening method, slide latex agglutination for PBP 2a, and PCR assay for mecA as the reference method. The mecA gene was detected in 29 S. sciuri isolates, and the true-positive and true-negative results of the other tests were defined on the basis of the presence or the absence of the mecA gene. For the different methods evaluated, the sensitivities and specificities were as follows: for the disk diffusion test with a 1-microg oxacillin disk, 100% and 55.9%, respectively; for the disk diffusion test with a 30-mug cefoxitin disk, 93.5% and 100%, respectively; for the agar dilution method, 100% and 50%, respectively; for the oxacillin salt-agar screen test (with 6 microg of oxacillin per ml and 4% NaCl) 100% and 100%, respectively; and for the slide latex agglutination test for PBP 2a, 100% and 100%, respectively. The disk diffusion test with various beta-lactam antibiotics was performed to evaluate their use for the prediction of oxacillin resistance. The results indicate that meropenem, cefazolin, cefamandole, cefuroxime, cefotetan, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, moxalactam, cefaclor, and cefprozil may be used as surrogate markers of oxacillin resistance, although further studies of their use for the detection of oxacillin resistance are required.     

Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares

Active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the strategies recommended by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America for control of nosocomial MRSA infections. Infection control and laboratory personnel desire rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive methods to enhance surveillance activities. A multicenter study was performed to evaluate a new selective and differential chromogenic medium, BBL CHROMagar MRSA (C-MRSA) medium (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD), which enables recovery and concomitant identification of MRSA strains directly from nasal swab specimens taken from the anterior nares. Specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood agar (TSA II, BD Diagnostics). Mauve colonies on C-MRSA at 24 h and 48 h and suspicious colonies on TSA II were confirmed as Staphylococcus aureus by Gram stain morphology and a coagulase test. In addition, the results of C-MRSA were compared to results of susceptibility testing (five different methods) of S. aureus strains isolated on TSA II. A total of 2,015 specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and TSA II. Three hundred fifty-four S. aureus isolates were recovered; 208 (59%) were oxacillin (methicillin) susceptible and 146 (41%) were oxacillin resistant (MRSA). On C-MRSA, 139/146 or 95.2% of MRSA isolates were recovered, whereas recovery on TSA II was 86.9% (127/146) (P = 0.0027). The overall specificity of C-MRSA was 99.7%. When C-MRSA was compared to each susceptibility testing method, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were as follows: oxacillin MIC by broth microdilution, 94.4% and 96.7%; oxacillin screen agar, 94.3% and 96.7%; PBP2' latex agglutination, 93.7% and 98.5%; cefoxitin disk diffusion, 95.0% and 98.1%; and mecA PCR, 95.1% and 98.1%. In this study, C-MRSA was superior to TSA II for recovery of MRSA from surveillance specimens obtained from the anterior nares and was comparable to conventional, rapid, and molecular susceptibility methods for the identification of MRSA isolates.     

Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam,the Vitek 2 system,and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test

Very-low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), or class 1 MRSA, is often misdiagnosed as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). We evaluated the performances of three methods for detection of low-level methicillin resistance: the disk diffusion method using the cephamycin antibiotics cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux), and the MRSA-screen test (Denka). Detection of the mecA gene by PCR was considered to be the "gold standard." We also determined the sensitivity of the oxacillin disk diffusion method with 5- and 1-microg disks and that of the Oxascreen agar assay with 6 mg of oxacillin liter(-1) for detection of MRSA. We compared the distributions of MICs of oxacillin and cefoxitin by the E-test (AB Biodisk), and those of moxalactam by dilutions in agar, for MRSA and MSSA isolates. The 152 clinical isolates of S. aureus studied were divided into 69 MSSA (mecA-negative) and 83 MRSA (mecA-positive) isolates, including 63 heterogeneous isolates and 26 class 1 isolates (low-level resistance). The cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion tests detected 100% of all the MRSA classes: cefoxitin inhibition zone diameters were <27 mm, and moxalactam inhibition zone diameters were <24 mm. The Vitek 2 system and the MRSA-screen test detected 94 and 97.6% of all MRSA isolates, respectively. The sensitivities of the 5- and 1-microg oxacillin disks were 95.2 and 96.4%, respectively, whereas that of the Oxascreen agar screen assay was 94%. All of the tests except the 1-microg oxacillin disk test were 100% specific. For the class 1 MRSA isolates, the sensitivity of the Vitek 2 test was 92.3%, whereas those of the MRSA-screen test and the disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam were 100%. Therefore, the cefoxitin and moxalactam disk diffusion methods were the best-performing tests for routine detection of all classes of MRSA.     

New chromogenic identification and detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus

This paper describes a new chromogenic plate medium, CHROMagar Staph aureus (CHROMagar, Paris, France), for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus on the basis of colony pigmentation. The abilities of CHROMagar Staph aureus, thermostable nuclease (DNase), and mannitol salt agar (MSA) to identify S. aureus isolates (n = 114) and discriminate between S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; n = 22) were compared. CHROMagar Staph aureus proved to be more sensitive and specific than DNase and MSA, allowing a reliable, simple, and rapid method for the identification of S. aureus isolates. All CoNS encountered in this study with the exception of S. chromogenes could be easily differentiated from S. aureus on this medium. The supplementation with 4 microgram of oxacillin or methicillin per ml allowed simple identification of methicillin resistance in hospital-acquired S. aureus strains which show multiple-drug resistance profiles. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains showing non-multi-drug resistance profiles require further evaluation on this new chromogenic medium. Methicillin or oxacillin resistance of all S. aureus isolates was confirmed by the detection of penicillin-binding protein 2a, encoded by the mecA gene, using the latex slide agglutination MRSA-Screen test (PBP 2' Test, DR900M; Oxoid).     

Evaluation of penicillin binding protein 2a latex agglutination assay for identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures

The penicillin binding protein 2a (PBP2a) latex agglutination test using a blood culture pellet was compared to the oxacillin screen agar method using isolated colonies. For blood cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus (n = 70), the direct PBP2a test was 18% sensitive and 100% specific. The PBP2a test shows poor sensitivity when used directly with positive blood cultures.     

Evaluation of MicroScan MIC panels for detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci.

Clinical isolates of staphylococci (420 Staphylococcus aureus isolates and 248 coagulase-negative staphylococci) were tested by both MicroScan MIC panels (MicroScan, West Sacramento, Calif.) and an oxacillin agar screen (Mueller-Hinton agar [Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.] containing 6 micrograms of oxacillin per ml and 4% NaCl) to evaluate the ability of MicroScan to detect oxacillin-resistant strains. MicroScan panels and oxacillin agar screen plates were incubated at 35 degrees C for 24 h and at 30 degrees C for an additional 24 h. Endpoints were recorded at 24 and 48 h. By MicroScan, 23 (5.5%) and 30 (7%) S. aureus isolates and 161 (65%) and 162 (65%) coagulase-negative staphylococci were oxacillin resistant at 24 and 48 h, respectively. At both 24 and 48 h, 23 (5.5%) S. aureus isolates and 162 (65%) coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant by the oxacillin agar screen. Five strains for which the oxacillin MIC was 2 or 4 micrograms/ml and eight strains resistant to oxacillin only at 48 h were further evaluated by broth macrodilution testing for oxacillin with and without clavulanic acid, by oxacillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disk diffusion, and by oxacillin agar screen comparing Mueller-Hinton agars purchased from Difco and BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md. By this additional testing, all 10 S. aureus isolates and 1 of 3 coagulase-negative staphylococci examined produced increased amounts of beta-lactamase. One coagulase-negative staphylococcus appeared to be truly intermediately oxacillin susceptible. There was no significant difference in the rate of detection of oxacillin resistance between MicroScan and the agar screen. MicroScan panels should be incubated for 24 h only, because prolonged incubation caused strains producing excessive amounts of beta-lactamase to appear to be falsely oxacillin resistant.     

Evaluation of the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

AIMS: To evaluate the BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: 52 methicillin resistant S aureus (MRSA) from five different countries and 85 methicillin susceptible S aureus (MSSA) were included. The species was confirmed by tube coagulation and detection of the clumping factor using the Staphaurex Plus. Clonal non-identity of the MRSA isolates was shown by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. MIC values (oxacillin) were determined using the Etest. Polymerase chain reaction was carried out to detect the mecA gene. The BBL Crystal MRSA ID System was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: The BBL Crystal MRSA ID System showed fluorescence in 45 of 52 MRSA (sensitivity 86.5%; negative predicitive value 92.2%), and the specificity was 97.6% (positive predicitive value 95.7%). Two of seven MRSA that failed to show fluorescence had MIC values (oxacillin) of 4 mg/litre. CONCLUSIONS: The BBL Crystal MRSA ID System is a valuable test for detecting oxacillin resistance in S aureus. Its major advantage is the short time (4-5 hours) required to perform the test when organisms are grown on tryptic soy agar or sheep blood agar. Difficulties may arise in borderline resistant isolates.     

Rapid detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci by a penicillin-binding protein 2a-specific latex agglutination test

The detection of PBP 2a by the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test with 201 clinical coagulase-negative staphylococci had an initial sensitivity of 98% and a high degree of specificity for Staphylococcus epidermidis strains compared to PCR for mecA. Determination of oxacillin MICs evaluated according to the new breakpoint (0.5 microg/ml) of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards exhibited an extremely low specificity for this population.