Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone

PURPOSE: We determine the effect of clinical and pathological variables on the outcome of patients with prostate cancer of Gleason scores 8 or greater treated with radical prostatectomy alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1987 and October 1998, 1,199 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. We identified 188 patients assigned a Gleason score of 8 or higher in the prostatectomy specimen who did not receive any neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Median followup was 60 months (range 1 to 129). Disease recurrence was defined as any detectable prostate specific antigen level 0.1 ng./ml. or greater. RESULTS: Of 188 patients 128 (68%) had no evidence of prostate cancer after a median followup of 60 months, while 60 (32%) demonstrated a detectable PSA level. There were 58 (31%) patients with disease confined to the prostate with negative surgical margins while 108 (57%) had prostate cancer confined to the surgical specimen. Positive surgical margin with extraprostatic extension was seen in 16 (9%) patients and seminal vesicle invasion was present in 40 (21%). The 5 and 7-year disease-free survival rates for the entire cohort were 71% and 55%, respectively. Patients with specimen confined disease had a significantly higher 5-year disease-free survival rate than those with nonspecimen confined disease (84% and 50%, p <0.0001). On multivariate analysis pathological status of the surgical specimen was the most significant independent predictor of disease recurrence. Age, ethnicity, clinical stage and preoperative PSA had no independent effect on disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term disease-free survival can be expected in those patients with high grade prostate cancer whose disease is confined to the prostate and/or the surgical specimen.     

Perineural invasion is a prognostic factor for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy

Objectives:   To identify the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Methods:   Overall, 237 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer between 1995 and 2004 were analyzed for all clinical and pathological factors. The influence of these two pathological features on biochemical failure-free survival was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results:   Lymphovascular and perineural invasion were identified in 41 (17.2%) and 100 (42.0%) patients, respectively. LVI and PNI were significantly associated with the preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, a higher PSA density, a higher pathological stage, a higher Gleason score, a higher frequency of extracapsular extension, a higher frequency of seminal vesicle invasion, and a higher frequency of a positive resection margin. Positive resection margins ( P  = 0.001) and perineural invasion ( P  = 0.011) were identified as independent factors associated with biochemical failure-free survival by the multivariate analysis.
Conclusions:   In this series, PNI was associated with established parameters of biologically aggressive disease, and was an important prognostic factor for biochemical failure-free survival in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. This finding supports routine evaluation of the PNI status in radical prostatectomy specimens and suggests that patients with PNI should be more closely followed after surgery.     

Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers

PURPOSE: We compared pathological findings with prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure rates following radical prostatectomy for large volume cancers (6 cc or greater). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 191 men whose radical prostatectomy specimen had a cancer volume of 6 cc or greater were followed for a mean of 3.6 years (range 0.3 to 11.1) and 112 (58.6%) had PSA failure (PSA 0.07 ng./ml. or greater and increasing). Percent Gleason grade 4/5 (the Stanford modified Gleason scale), cancer volume, seminal vesicle invasion, regional lymph nodes, capsular penetration, positive surgical margin, location of the largest cancer in the peripheral or transition zone, prostate weight, patient age, preoperative PSA and clinical stage were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: In univariate regression analysis percent Gleason grade 4/5, lymph node involvement, cancer volume, cancer location in the peripheral zone, capsular penetration and positive surgical margins were significant predictors of biochemical failure. Seminal vesicle invasion, preoperative serum PSA, patient age, prostate weight and clinical stage were not statistically significant. Forward stepwise, multivariate analysis showed that percent Gleason grade 4/5 (p <0.0001, relative risk ratio 2.498), cancer location in the peripheral zone (p = 0.0097, 1.887), cancer volume (p = 0.0157, 1.691) and lymph node involvement (p = 0.0317, 1. 666) were the only independent predictors of biochemical failure. When 52 men with organ confined, large volume prostate cancer were analyzed separately, univariate and multivariate analyses showed that only cancer location in the peripheral zone (p = 0.0021, relative risk ratio 13.473) and percent Gleason grade 4/5 (p = 0. 0449, 4.111) were independent predictors of failure. CONCLUSIONS: Percent Gleason grade 4/5, cancer location in the peripheral zone, cancer volume and lymph node involvement have prognostic value in large volume prostate cancer. Cancer location in the peripheral zone and percent Gleason grade 4/5 are the most powerful predictors of biochemical failure in men whose cancer is 6 cc or greater and contained in the prostatic capsule. Preoperative serum PSA is not helpful in distinguishing biochemical failure rates in these large volume cancers whether they are organ confined or not.     

Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term outcome of radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason score 8 or greater prostate cancer and characterized the prognostic significance of other pathological variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6,419 patients underwent radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 1996. There were 407 patients classified as having pathological Gleason 8 or greater, including 8 in 48%, 9 in 49% and 10 in 3%. Adjuvant treatment was used in 45% of patients and adjuvant hormonal therapy was administered to 155 (38%). Progression-free, including local or systemic, and/or prostate specific antigen (PSA) 0.4 ng./ml. or greater, and cancer specific survival were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of pathological grade and stage, preoperative PSA, DNA ploidy, margin status, tumor dimension, seminal vesicle invasion, and adjuvant treatment was assessed with the univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Pathological stage distribution was pT2 in 26% of patients, pT3 48% and pTxN+ 27%. Overall and progression-free survival at 10 years was 67% and 36%, respectively, compared to cancer specific survival 85%. Adjuvant treatment, pathological stage, preoperative PSA and pathological grade were significant (less than 0.05) univariate predictors of progression-free survival. Pathological stage, margin status and ploidy were univariately associated with cancer specific survival. Progression-free survival at 10 years of those patients who did and did not receive adjuvant treatment was 52% and 23%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis pathological grade (p=0.02), preoperative PSA (p <0.0001), adjuvant therapy (p <0.0001) and pathological stage (p=0.036) were significant independent predictors of progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: High grade prostate cancer can be controlled with radical prostatectomy in some patients with disease confined pathologically, and 10-year cause specific survival is 96%. Predictors of outcome in patients with Gleason 8 disease or greater are similar to established predictors derived by using all grades. Although adjuvant hormonal therapy appears to improve disease progression rates after radical prostatectomy on the basis of this nonrandomized study, it may not affect prostate cancer death rates within 10 years in patients with high grade cancer.     

Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4

PURPOSE: We evaluated differences in clinical and pathological outcomes between Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radical prostatectomy whole mounted specimens from 263 men with pathological Gleason 7 tumors were identified. Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 tumors were compared in regard to pathological variables and outcome. Significance of clinical and pathological data on progression-free survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Of the tumors 34% had a primary Gleason grade of 4, and were more likely than those with primary grade 3 to have seminal vesicle involvement (34% versus 18%, p = 0.006), a higher pathological stage (pT3 55% versus 42%, N+ 13% versus 3%, 0.001), extraprostatic extension (58% versus 38%, 0.001) and higher median preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) (13.5 versus 9.0 ng./ml., respectively <0.001). Mean followup plus or minus standard deviation was 6.8 +/- 1.9 years. The overall 10-year crude, cancer specific and progression-free survival rates were 83%, 99% and 58%, respectively. Primary Gleason grade was significantly associated with progression-free (risk ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 2.5, p = 0.02) but not crude and cancer-specific survival. Univariately, primary Gleason grade 4 was associated with progression-free survival, as were percent Gleason 4, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node involvement, pT stage, margin status, DNA ploidy, preoperative PSA, cancer volume and extent of extraprostatic extension. Multivariately, only preoperative PSA (p <0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (<0.001) and DNA ploidy (0.002) were associated with progression-free survival. Primary Gleason grade and percent Gleason 4 were not identified as independently associated with progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Gleason 7 score prostate cancer primary Gleason grade 3 and 4 cancers are different in pathological parameters and prognosis. However, primary Gleason grade does not provide any additional information than other known prognostic factors, such as preoperative PSA, seminal vesicle invasion and DNA ploidy.     

Prostate cancer in a large prostate is associated with a decreased prostate specific antigen failure rate after brachytherapy

PURPOSE: A large prostate has been found to correlate with improved prostate cancer survival in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. In the current study we analyzed the relationship of prostate size and prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure in men undergoing brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied data on 613 men who had undergone I radioactive seed implantation. Average patient age +/- SD was 65 +/- 7.2 years. Average prostate volume ultrasonically measured at seed insertion was 40 +/- 15 ml. All patients had a minimum of 2 years of followup. RESULTS: Men with a large prostate had increased freedom from failure compared to men with a small prostate. Failure time in men with an intermediate size prostate was between that for large and small prostates. This difference in failure rates was significant (log rank test p = 0.0002). We further analyzed our data with Cox regression. Large prostate size significantly correlated with increased time to PSA failure (p = 0.013) and it was independent of the significant effects of Gleason score, PSA, disease stage (p <0.001), minimal radiation dose covering 90% of prostate volume (p = 0.008) and hormone treatment, including androgen ablation (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Some investigators have postulated that paracrine signals acting to regulate epithelial proliferation in benign prostatic hypertrophy have beneficial influences on coexistent prostate cancer. Our finding that the effect of prostate size is independent of Gleason score, PSA and disease stage supports the paracrine signal mechanism. If a circulating substance, such as a cytokine, might be responsible for improved survival, this substance might be useful for treating prostate cancer. Moreover, since we found that prostate size is independent of PSA, Gleason score and tumor stage for predicting outcome, we hypothesize that patients with a small prostate treated with brachytherapy might benefit from hormone treatment and larger radiation doses. These measures are now generally reserved for men with more advanced tumors, higher PSA and increased Gleason scores.     

ROLE OF EARLY ADJUVANT HORMONAL THERAPY AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER

PURPOSE: Recent prospective randomized studies have shown that adjuvant hormonal therapy combined with local treatment can significantly improve overall survival in patients with locally advanced disease. This finding challenges the previous belief that adjuvant hormonal therapy may not be beneficial for minimal stages TxN + M0 or less prostate cancer, particularly when combined with local treatment. We reviewed the benefits of adjuvant hormonal therapy in patients at risk for disease progression, especially when administered after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the current literature and evaluated clinical information on stage pT3b cancer from a large single institution prostate cancer database to determine the current role of adjuvant hormonal therapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. RESULTS: Retrospective experimental and clinical studies have proved the impact of adjuvant hormonal therapy for decreasing prostate specific antigen (PSA) and clinical disease progression in patients with regionally limited prostatic cancer. This finding applies to stage pT3b as well as to lymph node positive cancer. Our literature review and current data from the Mayo Clinic database show that adjuvant hormonal therapy after prostatectomy has a significant impact on prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression but it also decreases systemic progression and cause specific death in patients with stage pT3b and lymph node positive disease. After adjusting for preoperative PSA, margins, grade, ploidy and patient age the risk ratio for stage pT3b disease in 707 cases was 0.3 (95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.7). A recent prospective randomized trial showed a significant decrease in cancer death in N+ cases when adjuvant hormonal therapy was administered after radical prostatectomy, supporting previous Mayo Clinic data on N+ disease that favors combination therapy. In the PSA era, that is 1987 and after, our database data on stage pTxN+ cancer indicates that radical prostatectomy and hormonal therapy for single node positive disease resulted in 94% 10-year cause specific survival, which was not significantly different from the rate in patients with N0 disease after adjusting for local stage, Gleason grade, margins, ploidy, PSA and adjuvant hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our literature review, including prospective randomized studies, and more recent results in the PSA era from our database indicate that early adjuvant hormonal therapy has a significant impact on time to progression and cause specific survival in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and limited lymph node disease who undergo radical prostatectomy, although in a retrospective nonrandomized study. Future prospective studies with longer followup are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of adjuvant treatment in regard to survival for stages pT2 and pT3a disease with unfavorable pathological variables.     

An analysis of 148 consecutive transition zone cancers: clinical and histological characteristics

PURPOSE: To improve our understanding of transition zone cancer in terms of the diagnosis and biological behavior we examined all morphological and clinical variables in 148 consecutive cases of untreated transition zone cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy. We matched 79 cases by total cancer volume to 79 of pure peripheral zone cancer with no secondary tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Stanford technique of prospective 3 mm. step sections we identified 175 of 996 men (18%) with untreated transition zone cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy who had the largest cancer volume in the transition zone. We excluded 27 patients from study due to previous transurethral prostatic resection or incomplete data. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) was determined by the Tosoh AIA-600 PSA assay. Postoperatively a PSA of 0.07 ng./ml. and increasing represented biochemical failure when the assay was done in the ultrasensitive mode. RESULTS: Of the 148 cases of transition zone cancer 80% had organ confined disease, 70% stage T1c impalpable disease, 63% a positive initial prostatic biopsy, 62% unilateral cancer in the transition zone, 52% a secondary tumor only in the peripheral zone, 61% serum PSA 10 ng./ml. or greater preoperatively, 36% cancer volume greater than 6 cc and 24% at least 50% Gleason grade 4/5 cancer. Only 20% of the tumors were located in the proximal third of the transition zone near the bladder. The number of secondary tumors in the transition zone ranged from 1 to 12 (median 3) and secondary tumor volume ranged from 0.01 to 4.8 cc (median 0.6). Mean distance plus or minus standard deviation from the posterior prostatic capsule to the posterior border of the transition zone cancer was 12. 0 +/- 7.6 mm. (median 12.3). While only 15% of patients had capsular penetration, 29% had anterior positive surgical margins, 2.7% seminal vesicle invasion and 3.4% lymph node metastasis. When 79 transition zone cancers were matched by volume with 79 peripheral zone cancers, there were no differences in percent Gleason grade 4/5, serum PSA or prostate weight, although differences in clinical stage T1c to T2c and organ confined cancer were highly significant (p <0.0001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that at 5 years of followup 49.2% of the men with peripheral zone cancer had undetectable PSA compared with 71.5% of those with transition zone cancer (log rank test p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Our report should make it easier to diagnose transition zone cancer. The 72% biochemical PSA cure rate is significantly higher than the 49% cure rate for peripheral zone cancer. Since cancer volume and percent Gleason grade 4/5 disease were the same in these 2 groups matched by cancer volume, the differences in behavior of peripheral and transition zone cancers must be sought at the molecular level unless anatomical location alone explains the differences in progression. Pathologists should differentiate transition from peripheral zone cancer when analyzing radical prostatectomy specimens.     

Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: impact of a positive margin

PURPOSE: Bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy has been correlated with improved continence. However, the hazard of a positive margin at this specific site has discouraged many urologists. We evaluated if preservation of the bladder neck at the time of radical prostatectomy jeopardizes surgical cancer control with consequent deleterious outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 675 consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) by a single surgeon (J.E.P.) at Wayne State University during the 1990s decade. The bladder neck was preserved. Margin-positivity was categorized by location and number. Preoperative, pathological and disease status data was prospectively collected into the Karmanos Cancer Institute multidisciplinary prostate cancer database. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 555 patients who had RP as monotherapy. Positive margins were found in 178 (32%) of these patients. Correlation between specimen Gleason score, prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and margin status, was encountered (p=0.001). Apical and bladder neck margin-positivity was detected in 104/555 (19%) and 13/555 (2%), respectively. Of those specimens with a positive margin at the bladder neck eight had Gleason score > or =7, three had seminal vesicle invasion and two nodal disease. Only two patients had a positive bladder neck margin as the sole adverse pathological feature. Significant independent predictors of survival included the Gleason score, PSA, pathological stage and presence of positive margins in more than one location. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical preservation of the bladder neck does not increase the percentage of positive margins at this anatomical location and does not compromise disease-free survival.     

Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: In radical prostatectomy specimens Gleason score 7 is among the most commonly assigned scores for prostate carcinoma accounting for 30% to 50% of cases. Gleason score 7 is different from other more differentiated prostate carcinomas (tumors of Gleason scores 5 and 6) with a significantly worse outcome and higher rate of recurrence. Nonetheless, Gleason score 7 tumors are heterogeneous. In this study we examined the differences in clinical outcome between primary Gleason grade 3 and 4 tumors in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, and determined the influence of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on patient outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 504 patients underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and 228 of the patients (45%) had a Gleason score of 7. Cases were analyzed for a variety of clinical and pathological parameters. The influence of primary Gleason pattern and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on patient outcome was assessed in the Cox regression model. RESULTS: Among 228 patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma, 91 (40%) had a primary Gleason pattern 4 and 137 (60%) had primary Gleason pattern 3. Patients of the former group were more likely to have a higher pathological stage (p = 0.003), more likely to have PSA recurrence (p = 0.02) and more likely to have a tertiary Gleason pattern 5 (p <0.0001). A total of 37 (41%) patients with primary Gleason 4 had a tertiary Gleason pattern 5, whereas only 13 (9%) patients with primary Gleason 3 had a tertiary Gleason pattern 5. In the Cox regression model controlling for tumor stage and surgical margin status, the primary Gleason pattern was not an independent predictor of PSA recurrence (p = 0.80), whereas the presence of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 was a significant predictor of PSA recurrence (hazard ratio 2.10, 95% CI 1.24-3.55, p = 0.006). Five-year PSA recurrence-free survival was 70% for patients without a tertiary Gleason pattern 5 compared to 19% for those patients with a tertiary Gleason pattern 5. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with Gleason score 7, primary Gleason grade 4 indicates a likelihood of higher tumor stage and higher probability of PSA recurrence than does primary pattern 3. However, it does not independently predict a worse outcome after controlling for other known prognostic parameters associated with disease progression. Regardless of whether the primary Gleason pattern is 3 or 4, a tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is the strongest predictor of a worse outcome in patients with Gleason grade 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Therefore, tertiary pattern 5 should be reported in radical prostatectomy specimens.     

FAMILIAL PROSTATE CANCER: A DIFFERENT DISEASE?

Purpose

We analyzed the outcome after radical prostatectomy of patients with familial prostate cancer versus patients with sporadic prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

The study included 720 patients with prostate carcinoma who were treated with prostatectomy between 1987 and 1996. Patients were excluded from the study if they had received adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment, or had no available pretreatment prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level, no available biopsy Gleason score, incomplete pathological information or no available followup PSA levels. The analysis was performed on 529 cases. Patients were considered to have a positive family history for prostate cancer when the index patient confirmed the diagnosis of prostate cancer in a first degree relative (brother or father). The outcomes of interest were biochemical relapse-free survival, local failure and distant metastases. Proportional hazards were used to analyze the effect of family history and confounding variables (that is age, stage, biopsy Gleason score, initial PSA levels, surgical specimen Gleason score, extracapsular extension, lymph node metastasis, seminal vesicle invasion and surgical margin involvement) on treatment outcome.

Results

Median followup was 30 months. Of all cases 12% had a positive family history. Younger age was the only factor associated with positive family history, with 18% of patients younger than 65 years having a positive family history versus 6% of older patients (chi-square p <0.001). The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rate for the entire group was 64%. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rates for patients with negative family history versus positive history were 66% and 46%, respectively (p = 0.001). A multivariate time-to-failure analysis using the proportional hazards model was performed based on family history, age (less than 65 versus 65 to 69 versus 70 or greater, initial PSA (10 or less versus greater than 10), biopsy Gleason score (6 or less versus 7 or greater), clinical T stage (T1-T2 versus T2B-C), prostatectomy specimen Gleason score (6 or less versus 7 or greater), extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle involvement, surgical margin involvement and lymph node involvement. After adjusting for the potential confounding factors, positive family history remained strongly associated with biochemical failure. The clinical failure rate for the entire group was 14%. The 5-year local failure rate was 7%, with positive surgical margins being the only independent predictor of local failure. The 5-year distant metastasis rate was 8%, with family history and initial PSA levels being independent predictors of distant relapse.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that patients with a familial prostate cancer have a higher likelihood of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy than patients with sporadic cancer. This effect is independent of pretreatment or pathological factors. Our results suggest that the higher failure rates associated with familial prostate cancer are mainly secondary to higher distant relapse rates, and that familial prostate cancer may be more biologically aggressive than sporadic cancers.     

Prognostic significance of tumor volume after radical prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis of pathological prognostic factors

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the association between Gleason score, stage and status of surgical margins with tumor volume in prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: 200 consecutive radical prostatectomy specimens were analyzed. Preoperative clinical stage, PSA, results of prostate biopsies as well as pathological results were noted. A biochemical recurrence was defined as a single, postoperative detectable PSA level (>0.2 ng/ml). Tumor volume was compared to postoperative staging, Gleason score, and surgical margin status to predict tumor progression. Univariate and multivariate analysis using stepwise logistic regression were used to identify parameters with additional prognostic value. RESULTS: Pathological results of the prostatectomy specimens showed 149 (74.5%) pT2a-b, 29 (14.5%) pT3a and 22 (11%) pT3b tumors. Tumor volume was 0.57 cc for pT2a, 1.2cc for pT2b, 1.7cc for pT3a and 2.9cc for pT3b, respectively (p<0.05). Taken together, mean volume for pT2 and pT3 were 1.06 and 2.2 cc, respectively (p<0.0001). Five-year progression-free actuarial survival was 69.7%. Using univariate analysis, tumor progression correlated with final Gleason score (p<0.0007), positive surgical margins (p=0.02), tumor volume (p=0.009) and stage (p<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, tumor progression correlated only with the final Gleason score (p=0.04) and stage (p=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Gleason score and pathological stage are independent factors to predict prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. When these parameters are known, tumor volume does not provide additional information.     

Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: preliminary results

PURPOSE: We evaluate a strategy of expectant management for men with stage T1c prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 81 men (median age 65 years, range 52 to 72) with stage T1c prostate cancer who were thought to have small volume prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings and prostate specific antigen (PSA) density were followed for more than 1 year with semiannual PSA and digital rectal examination, and annual prostate biopsies (median followup 23 months, range 12 to 58). A recommendation for treatment was made if disease progression was indicated by unfavorable followup needle biopsy findings (Gleason pattern 4 or 5, greater than 2 biopsy cores with cancer, greater than 50% involvement of any core with cancer). Curable disease was defined on pathological examination of radical prostatectomy specimens as 1) organ confined cancer of Gleason score 7 or less, 2) cancer with extraprostatic extension of Gleason score 7 (3+4) or less with negative margins, seminal vesicles and lymph nodes, or 3) cancer of Gleason score 6 or less regardless of margin status or extraprostatic extension if negative seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. RESULTS: Of the 81 men 25 (31%) had progression of disease at followup. PSA density was statistically significantly higher (p = 0.01) and the percentage of free PSA was statistically significantly lower (p = 0.04) in men with compared to those without disease progression. Disease progression occurred in 22 of 39 men (56%) with every followup biopsy showing cancer compared to 3 of 42 (2%) men with 1 or more negative followup biopsies (p <0.001). Of the 25 men with progression 13 underwent radical prostatectomy and 12 of 13 (92%) had curable cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Expectant management with curative intent may be a reasonable alternative for carefully selected older men who are thought to have small volume cancers.     

Role of radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score

BACKGROUND: The routine use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing combined with digital rectal examination has lowered tumor volume and clinical-pathological stage of men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Therefore, we may identify more men with poorly differentiated tumors of early clinical stage. In order to identify those who may benefit from radical prostatectomy, we evaluated known prognostic variables in patients with prostate cancer of high Gleason score (8-10). METHODS: Of 652 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy as monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer between March 1991-December 1995, 84 patients with prostatectomy specimen Gleason score 8-10 tumors were identified. Clinical-pathological data were obtained from our prostate cancer database. Gleason score, PSA level, margin status, pathologic stage, and tumor volume were analyzed as general prognostic variables for disease-free survival (DFS). Follow-up ranged from 13-84 months (median, 36.2). Biochemical recurrence was defined as a postoperative PSA elevation greater than 0.4 ng/ml. RESULTS: The DFS for patients with Gleason score 8-10 and pathologically organ-confined disease was 62.5%. DFS was 56.2% for patients with PSA < or =10 ng/ml, compared to 19.2% for patients with serum PSA >10 ng/ml (P = 0.009). Patients with nonspecimen-confined disease (positive margins) had a DFS rate of 26.6% vs. 55% for patients with specimen-confined disease (negative margins) (P = 0.009). On multivariable analysis, only preoperative PSA < or =10 ng/ml (P = 0.02) and surgical margin status (P = 0.04) were significant predictors of DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical margin status and preoperative serum PSA level are independent predictors of DFS for patients with high Gleason score prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy as monotherapy. Patients with poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated surgically at an early stage can have a favorable prognosis, especially if negative surgical margins are obtained. A preoperative serum PSA level < or =10 ng/ml carries the greatest likelihood of achieving prolonged DFS in this group of patients.     

LACK OF ASSOCIATION OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA NUCLEAR GRADING WITH PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

PURPOSE: Grading prostate cancer using the Gleason system relies only on architectural tumor growth, in contrast to other systems, such as the WHO system, which grade prostate carcinoma based on nuclear features as well as architectural patterns. The prognostic significance of nuclear grading remains controversial since most studies were performed before prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening became widely available. We evaluated the significance of nuclear grade for predicting PSA recurrence in a contemporary cohort of patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nuclear grades 1 to 3 were determined in 141 consecutive radical prostatectomies in 1995. Predominant and worst nuclear grade was determined by a consensus of 3 pathologists. Statistical analysis compared nuclear grade with Gleason score using the chi-square test. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to calculate the ability of nuclear grade, Gleason score and other variables to predict PSA recurrence. RESULTS: We identified a significant association of Gleason score with worst nuclear grade (p = 0.007). All 6 cases with a Gleason score of 8 or greater had a worst nuclear grade of 3, in contrast to 36 of 60 (60%) with a score 6 or less, in which the worst nuclear grade was 3. Of the 141 patients 31 (21.9%) had PSA recurrence at a median followup of 3.7 years. The univariate Cox model revealed significant associations of PSA recurrence with Gleason score 8 or greater (hazards ratio 5.5, p = 0.005), extraprostatic extension (hazards ratio 3.4, p = 0.001), positive surgical margin (hazards ratio 2.6, p = 0.009), seminal vesicle involvement (hazards ratio 7.3, p <0.001), preoperative serum PSA (hazards ratio 1.03, p = 0.007), tumor stage (hazards ratio 3.6, p = 0.001) and maximal tumor dimension (hazards ratio 2.4, p <0.001). However, overall and worst nuclear grade did not predict PSA recurrence (p = 0.89 and 0.13, respectively). Nuclear grade did not fit any multivariate model tested, which otherwise included Gleason score, log(PSA), surgical margin status, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle status, tumor size and pathological stage. By varying sample fixation time we also showed that benign prostate tissue in the same section as prostate carcinoma had grade 2 or 3 nuclear changes, that is moderate to marked anaplasia. CONCLUSIONS: High nuclear grade is associated with high Gleason score. However, prostate carcinoma with a Gleason score of 6 or less shows extreme variability. Nuclear grade determined by light microscopy failed to predict PSA recurrence in a contemporary series of men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Nuclear morphology is subject to tissue fixation and processing artifact. Any nuclear morphometric study must consider this artifact.     

Serum Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Specific Antigen Density in Patients Receiving Radical Prostatectomy

Objective: To study the significance of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) for predicting the risk of occult metastatic disease and extra-prostatic invasion of prostate cancer in patients receiving radical prostatectomy.
Patients and methods: The cases of 41 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were reviewed. Relations of PSA and PSAD using Market M PA^1M assay for grade, preopvrative clinical stage, postoperative pathological stage, capsular penetration, seminal vesicle invasion, resection margins and lymphnode metastasis are discussed.
Results: Although serum PSA was correlated with PSAD and PSA was correlated with preoperative prostate volume, PSAO was not influenced by prostate volume. PSA correlated only with the grade, while PSAD was correlated with grade, preoperative clinical Stage, postoperative pathological stage, capsular penetration, seminal vesicle invasion, resection margins and lymphnode metastasis. In addition, sixty-two percent (8/13) of margin positive patients showed a PSAD value of more than 0.4, while 93% (26/28) of margin negative patients showed less than 0.4. Sixty-seven percent (6/9) of lymphnode positive patients showed a PSAD of more than 0.4, while 91% (29/32) of lymphnode negative patients showed less than 0.4.
Conclusion: We concluded that PSAD was useful for predicting extraprostatic involvement of prostatic cancer.     

Percent free prostate specific antigen is not an independent predictor of organ confinement or prostate specific antigen recurrence in unscreened patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We studied the controversial relationship of percent free prostate specific antigen (PSA) with organ confined prostate cancer and PSA failure after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested the characteristics of the percent free PSA monoclonal Immulite DPC Immunoassay (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, California) for predicting organ confinement in 698 consecutive unscreened men treated only with radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 2000. In addition, we assessed the ability of percent free PSA to predict post-radical prostatectomy PSA failure, defined as PSA 0.1 ng./ml. or greater, in a subset of 581 men in whom followup was available. All statistical analyses were repeated for stage T1c cancer with PSA between 2 and 10 ng./ml. RESULTS: On univariate analyses percent free PSA achieved significance for predicting organ confined disease at all clinical stages (p <0.001) and for stage T1c cancer with PSA between 2 and 10 ng./ml. (p = 0.012). However, significance dissipated after controlling for total PSA, biopsy Gleason sum and clinical stage (p = 0.135 and 0.851, respectively). In univariate Cox models percent free PSA failed to predict PSA failure across stages (p = 0.341), as well as in stage T1c cancer (p = 0.93). In multivariate analyses controlling for traditional PSA biopsy grade and clinical stage (p <0.001), percent free PSA failed to contribute to predicting PSA failure (p = 0.342). In the stage T1c subset biopsy Gleason sum (p <0.001) and PSA (p = 0.018) remained significant, in contrast to percent free PSA (p = 0.237). CONCLUSIONS: Percent free PSA has no independent, statistically significant association with organ confined status or posttreatment PSA outcome in unscreened patients who undergo radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.     

The role of p53, bcl-2 and E-cadherin expression in predicting biochemical relapse for organ confined prostate cancer in Taiwan

PURPOSE: We evaluated the prognostic significance of p53, bcl-2 and E-cadherin immunoreactivity for organ confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records on 70 pT2 prostatic adenocarcinomas were analyzed retrospectively. Radical prostatectomy specimens were stained using antip53 (DO7), antibcl-2 (124) (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and antiE-cadherin (HECD-1) (R & D Systems, Abingdon, United Kingdom) antibodies. Biochemical relapse was defined as 2 consecutive elevations in serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) higher than 0.2 ng/ml. The prognostic significance of Gleason grade, PSA, and p53, bcl-2 and E-cadherin expression was assessed. RESULTS: While p53 immunoreactivity was identified in 16 patients (22.9%), only 3 tumors (4.3%) expressed bcl-2. Aberrant E-cadherin expression was noted in 39 tumors (55.7%). At a median followup of 36.5 months 21 patients (30%) experienced biochemical relapse. There was a significantly higher biochemical failure rate in patients with abnormal bcl-2 and E-cadherin expression (log rank test p = 0.024 and 0.003, respectively). On multivariate analysis bcl-2 and E-cadherin contributed independently to the prediction of PSA relapse (p = 0.017 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We noted that bcl-2 and aberrant E-cadherin expression are independent factors predicting biochemical relapse in stage pT2 prostatic cancers.     

Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that patients with clinical stage T2c-T3 prostate cancer, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis greater than 20 ng./ml. or a biopsy Gleason score of 8 to 10 are at high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We determined the most important pretreatment predictors of disease recurrence in this high risk population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 547 patients with high risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at University of California, San Francisco or as part of the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor data base, a longitudinal disease registry of patients with prostate cancer. High risk disease was defined as 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage T2c-T3 disease in 411 patients, serum PSA at diagnosis greater than 20 ng./ml. in 124 and/or biopsy Gleason score 8 to 10 in 114. Disease recurrence was defined as PSA 0.2 ng./ml. or greater on 2 consecutive occasions after radical prostatectomy or second cancer treatment more than 6 months after surgery. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to determine significant independent predictors of disease recurrence. The likelihood of disease recurrence for clinically relevant patient groups was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. RESULTS: Median followup after surgery was 3.1 years. Disease recurred in 177 patients (32%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that serum PSA at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason score, ethnicity and the percent of positive prostate biopsies were significant independent predictors of disease recurrence, while patient age and clinical tumor stage were not. Patients with a Gleason score 8 to 10 tumor and a serum PSA of 10 ng./ml. or less had a significantly higher likelihood of remaining disease-free 5 years after surgery than those with PSA greater than 10 ng./ml. (47% versus 19%, p <0.05). Patients with a serum PSA at diagnosis of greater than 20 ng./ml. and a Gleason score of less than 8 had a significantly higher likelihood of remaining disease-free 5 years after surgery than similar patients with a Gleason score of 8 or greater (45% versus 0%, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PSA, Gleason score, ethnicity and the percent of positive prostate biopsies appear to be the most important pretreatment predictors of disease recurrence in men with high risk prostate cancer. Patients with high grade disease may continue to be appropriate candidates for local therapy if PSA is less than 10 ng./ml. at diagnosis or there are fewer than 66% positive prostate biopsies.