Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma with dacarbazine plus tamoxifen,or vindesine plus tamoxifen: a prospective randomized study

This study aimed to verify whether the advantage in terms of response rate and survival of dacarbazine plus tamoxifen over dacarbazine alone in metastatic malignant melanoma reported in a previous randomized trial was due to a specific interaction of dacarbazine with tamoxifen. A total of 125 patients with locoregional or disseminated malignant melanoma were randomized to receive dacarbazine (250 mg/m(2) days 1-5 every 3 weeks) plus tamoxifen (arm A) or vindesine (3 mg/m(2) every week for 6 weeks, then every 2 weeks) plus tamoxifen (arm B). Of the 125 randomized patients, 57 and 59 were evaluable in arm A and B, respectively. The complete response rates were the same (2% versus 2%) and the complete plus partial response rates were similar (11% versus 14%) in the two groups. There was no significant difference in survival. Neither response or survival correlated with gender. In conclusion, when combined with tamoxifen, dacarbazine does not have a specific effect on response or survival compared with vindesine. The lower response rate to dacarbazine plus tamoxifen (11%) than that reported in the previous trial (28%) might be explained by actual differences in patient and/or participating centre accrual characteristics in the presence of apparently identical eligibility criteria.     

Comparison of the efficacy of two different dosage dacarbazine-based regimens and two regimens without dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: a single-centre randomized four-arm study

The aim of this randomized four-arm phase III study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in activity between regimens containing dacarbazine and regimens without dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma, whether there is a dose-effect relationship for dacarbazine, and whether non-dacarbazine-containing aggressive regimens are in any way superior to non-aggressive ones. A total of 219 patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma were included in this study; 196 of them were evaluable for activity. The patients were randomized into four treatment arms: arm A (standard dose dacarbazine arm), vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1, carmustine (BCNU) 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and dacarbazine 300 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 2-5; arm B (high-dose dacarbazine arm), vincristine and BCNU as in arm A and dacarbazine 600 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 2-5; arm C ('aggressive' regimen without dacarbazine), vindesine 3 mg/m2 on day 1, bleomycin 7 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 1-4, and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 5-8; arm D ('non-aggressive' regimen without dacarbazine), BCNU 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and procarbazine 90 mg/m2 per 24 h on days 1-10. The four arms were well balanced with regard to patient- and disease-related characteristics. On an intend-to-treat basis, the response rate was 11 out of 49 (22%) in arm A, nine out of 47 (19%) in arm B, 16 out of 63 (25%) in arm C and nine out of 60 (15%) in arm D. There was a large overlap between the 95% confidence intervals and no significant differences in the response rates between the four arms. Median survival in the four treatment arms was 4, 5, 6 and 4 months, respectively, again with no significant differences. Median survival for responders (8, 11, 10 and 13 months, respectively) in all four arms was significantly longer than in non-responders (4, 3, 5 and 4 months, respectively). Arms A, B and C were significantly more toxic compared with arm D, which was for all practical purposes devoid of toxicities. The efficacy of all four regimens thus appeared comparable both in terms of response rate and survival. Responders in all four arms achieved a survival benefit. There does not seem to be a dose-effect relationship for dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma. Chemotherapy from arm D, might be well suited for 'fragile' or elderly patients due to the lack of toxicity.     

A randomized phase 2 study of etaracizumab,a monoclonal antibody against integrin αvβ3, ± dacarbazine in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND:

The alpha _v beta ₃ (α_vβ₃) integrin is involved in intracellular signaling regulating cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation and is important for tumor‐induced angiogenesis.

METHODS:

This phase 2, randomized, open‐label, 2‐arm study was designed to capture safety data and evaluate the antitumor efficacy of etaracizumab (Abegrin), an IgG1 humanized monoclonal antibody against the α_vβ₃ integrin, in patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma. The objective was to evaluate whether etaracizumab ± dacarbazine had sufficient clinical activity to warrant further study in a phase 3 clinical trial.

RESULTS:

One hundred twelve patients were randomized to receive etaracizumab alone (N = 57) or etaracizumab + dacarbazine (N = 55). Safety of etaracizumab ± dacarbazine was acceptable with infusion‐related, gastrointestinal, and metabolic reactions being the most common adverse events (AEs). The majority of AEs were grade 1 or 2 in severity in both study arms; most events were not considered serious, except for cardiovascular (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation) and thromboembolic events, which occurred in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. None of the patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 12.7% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm achieved an objective response. The median duration of objective response in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm was 4.2 months. Stable disease rate, time to progression (TTP), and progression‐free survival (PFS) appeared to be similar between the 2 treatment arms. Stable disease occurred in 45.6% of patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 40.0% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm. Median TTP and median PFS were both 1.8 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 2.5 and 2.6 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm, respectively. Median overall survival was 12.6 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 9.4 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm.

CONCLUSIONS:

The survival results in both treatment arms of this study were considered unlikely to result in clinically meaningful improvement over dacarbazine alone. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Chemoimmunotherapy with dacarbazine, cisplatin, interferon-alpha2b and interleukin-2 versus two cycles of dacarbazine followed by chemoimmunotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: a randomised phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Melanoma Group

BackgroundChemoimmunotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma is associated with high toxicity, and only a subset of patients will benefit. This randomised phase II study was performed with the primary objective of exploring whether two cycles of dacarbazine monotherapy could select the subset of patients that would benefit most from more intensive chemoimmunotherapy.Patients and methodsPatients with metastatic melanoma were randomised to either receive chemoimmunotherapy with dacarbazine, cisplatin, interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 (arm A) or initial treatment with two cycles of dacarbazine monotherapy followed irrespective of response by the same 4-drug regimen of chemoimmunotherapy (arm B). Chemoimmunotherapy was continued in the absence of disease progression for a maximum of four cycles. Primary end-point was the disease stabilisation rate.ResultsA total of 93 patients were randomised, and 89 patients were eligible. Disease stabilisation (complete/partial response or stable disease) was achieved in 19 patients (42.2%) in arm A and 9 patients (20.5%) in arm B. In arm B 32 of the 44 patients continued chemoimmunotherapy after two cycles of dacarbazine. Of 20 patients with progressive disease (PD) after two cycles of dacarbazine in arm B, only 2 patients achieved an objective response. Median overall survival (OS) in arms A and B was 10.5 months and 9.5 months, respectively.ConclusionsDespite a lower initial stabilisation rate, the strategy of starting with 2 courses of DTIC prior to a 4-drug regimen led to comparable median overall survival. Only few transient responses were achieved with the 4-drug regimen in patients with disease progression on DTIC, suggesting frequent cross resistance. Two cycles of dacarbazine monotherapy cannot be recommended to select patients for more intensive chemoimmunotherapy.     

Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: Several single-institution phase II trials have reported that the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine, cisplatin, carmustine, and tamoxifen) can induce major tumor responses in 40% to 50% of stage IV melanoma patients. This study was designed to compare the overall survival time, rate of objective tumor response, and toxicity of the Dartmouth regimen with standard dacarbazine treatment in stage IV melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter phase III trial, 240 patients with measurable stage IV melanoma were randomized to receive the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine 220 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3, carmustine 150 mg/m(2) day 1 every other cycle, and tamoxifen 10 mg orally bid) or dacarbazine 1, 000 mg/m(2). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were observed for tumor response, survival time, and toxicity. RESULTS: Median survival time from randomization was 7 months; 25% of the patients survived > or = 1 year.There was no difference in survival time between the two treatment arms when analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis or when only the 231 patients who were both eligible and had received treatment were considered. Tumor response was assessable in 226 patients. The response rate to dacarbazine was 10.2% compared with 18.5% for the Dartmouth regimen (P =.09). Bone marrow suppression, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue were significantly more common in the Dartmouth arm. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in survival time and only a small, statistically nonsignificant increase in tumor response for stage IV melanoma patients treated with the Dartmouth regimen compared with dacarbazine. Dacarbazine remains the reference standard treatment for stage IV melanoma.     

Phase II randomized study of dacarbazine, carmustine, cisplatin and tamoxifen versus dacarbazine alone in advanced melanoma patients

This randomized phase II trial was performed to define the activity and toxicity of the combination of dacarbazine (DTIC), carmustine (BCNU), cisplatin (DDP) and tamoxifen (DBDT regimen) versus DTIC alone in patients with metastatic melanoma. Sixty patients with metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive BCNU 150 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 i.v. daily on days 1 to 3, DTIC 220 mg/m2 i.v. daily on days 1 to 3 and tamoxifen 160 mg orally daily for 7 days prior to chemotherapy (DBDT arm; arm A). Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days, while BCNU was given every two cycles. The DTIC arm (arm B) patients received DTIC alone 1200 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, repeated every 21 days. Patients were evaluated every two cycles; responding patients continued the treatment for a maximum of 12 cycles. The overall response rate was 26% in the DBDT arm and 5% in the DTIC arm. Complete responses were 2.5% for DBDT and 0% for DTIC. The median progression-free survival and the median survival were 4 and 9 months, respectively for DBDT, and 2 and 7 months for DTIC. DBDT was associated with significant haematological toxicity: 33% of the patients experienced a grade III or IV neutropenia and 28% a grade III or IV thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, the overall response rate obtained with DBDT was greater than that obtained with DTIC alone; however, this combination increases toxicity with limited impact on overall survival.     

Phase III clinical trial of the combination of cisplatin, dacarbazine, and carmustine with or without tamoxifen in patients with advanced malignant melanoma.

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted to assess whether the addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to the three-agent regimen of cisplatin (CDDP), dacarbazine (DTIC), and carmustine (BCNU) significantly increased the progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with advanced malignant melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced malignant melanoma were treated with CDDP + DTIC + BCNU (CDB) with or without TAM. The dose schedule was CDDP 25 mg/m(2) given intravenously (IV) for 30 to 45 minutes in 500 mL of dextrose and (1/2) normal saline (NS) on days 1 to 3 of a 3-week cycle; DTIC 220 mg/m(2) IV for 1 hour in 500 mL of dextrose and (1/2) NaCl on days 1 to 3 of a 3-week cycle; BCNU 150 mg/m(2) IV for 2 to 3 hours in 750 to 1,000 mL of dextrose and 5% water on day 1 of every odd 3-week cycle; and TAM 20 mg taken orally every morning. RESULTS: There were 184 eligible patients enrolled. These patients were observed until death or for a minimum of 1.3 years. At last contact, 12 were still alive. The median time to progression was 3.4 months on the CDB arm and 3.1 months on the CDB + TAM arm. The median survival time was 6.8 months with CDB and 6.9 months with CDB + TAM. Progression-free survival (P =.429) and overall survival (P =.545) were not found to differ by treatment. CONCLUSION: The addition of TAM to this three-agent regimen of CDB was not found to provide a meaningful clinical advantage in the treatment of patients with advanced malignant melanoma.     

Multi-institutional phase II randomized trial of integrated therapy with cisplatin, dacarbazine, vindesine, subcutaneous interleukin-2, interferon alpha2a and tamoxifen in metastatic melanoma. BREMIM (Biological Response Modifiers in Melanoma)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of a monochemotherapy regimen of dacarbazine (DTIC), tamoxifen , interferon-alpha2a and interleukin-2 (IL-2) and two polychemotherapy regimens of cisplatin, DTIC, vindesine, tamoxifen, interferon-alpha2a with or without IL-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma. Consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled in this trial and were randomized to arm A, consisting of DTIC 800 mg/m2 every 21 days, IL-2 9 MIU subcutaneously days 1-5 and 8-12, arm B, consisting of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 days 1-3, DTIC 250 mg/m2 days 1-3 and vindesine 2.5 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days (CVD), or arm C, consisting of CVD plus IL-2 6 MIU days 1-5 and 8-12 every 28 days. In all three arms Interferon 3 MU subcutaneously three times a week and tamoxifen 20 mg orally were given throughout. Ninety-two patients were included in this study. Patient characteristics in the three groups were well balanced. The three regimens were delivered on an outpatient basis without major toxicity. The toxicities that did occur consisted primarily of flu-like symptoms in the IL-2 arms (A and C) and haematological toxicities in the CVD arms (B and C). No grade IV toxicities were encountered and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The total response rate was 13% in arm A, 35% in arm B and 37% in arm C. The median duration of response was 6 months and the median survival was 11 months. According to this phase II randomized trial polychemoimmunotherapy with CVD has an objective response rate of 35-36%, while monochemoimmunotherapy with DTIC has a response rate of 13%.     

Metastatic melanoma

Opinion statement The overall survival for patients with metastatic melanoma ranges from 4.7 to 11 months, with a median survival of 8.5 months. Standard treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma has not been defined. The range of treatment options includes close observation, surgical resection of isolated metastases, therapy with dacarbazine, combination chemotherapy, and participation in clinical trials. Numerous chemotherapeutic agents have shown activity in the treatment of malignant melanoma. Dacarbazine (DTIC-Dome; Bayer Corporation, West Haven, CT) has a response rate of 15% to 20% and remains the reference agent for the treatment of metastatic disease. Additional agents with single-agent activity include cisplatin, (Platinol-AQ; Bristol-Myers Oncology, Princeton, NJ); carmustine (BiCNU; Bristol-Myers Oncology, Princeton, NJ); paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ); and docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Collegeville, PA). Temozolomide (Temodar; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ), which is essentially an oral form of dacarbazine but with greater central nervous system penetrance, is associated with a response rate of 20%. Combination chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen has been extensively evaluated in patients with metastatic melanoma. Although the initial results with the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine, cisplatin, carmustine, and tamoxifen) were associated with overall response rates of 50% to 55% in single-institution studies, results from larger multicenter studies reveal responses rates ranging from 10% to 20%. Based on the results of several clinical trials, there is no evidence that the addition of tamoxifen improves the response rate. Another combination regimen is cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD), which is associated with a 20% to 25% response rate. There has been widespread interest in developing immunotherapies against metastatic melanoma. Interferon (IFN)-alfa and interleukin (IL)-2 as single agents have produced response rates in the 15% to 20% range. Biochemotherapy, which is a combination of immunotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, has been studied in patients with metastatic melanoma. Multiple phase II studies have demonstrated high response rates but unclear impact on overall survival. Therapy is associated with significant toxicity. Ongoing randomized clinical trials will clarify the role of biochemotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Ongoing new approaches to treatment include the therapeutic use of vaccines alone or in combination with cytokines.     

Temozolomide in combination with interferon-alfa versus temozolomide alone in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a randomized, phase III, multicenter study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma equal to that of dacarbazine (DTIC), the standard chemotherapeutic agent for melanoma. As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-alpha in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week). RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-two patients were eligible for an intent-to-treat analysis, 271 patients were treated per protocol. In the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm, 33 (24.1%) of 137 patients responded to therapy (partial or complete remission) whereas in the monotherapy arm, in 18 (13.4%) of 134 patients, a response was evident. Thus, the response rate was significantly higher in the combination arm (P = .036). Median survival time was 8.4 months for patients treated with TMZ (95% CI, 7.07 to 9.27) and 9.7 months for those treated with the combination (95% CI, 8.26 to 11.18; P = .16). Dose modifications and interval prolongations due to hematologic toxicity were significantly more frequent in the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In metastatic melanoma treatment with TMZ + IFN-alpha leads to a significantly superior OR rate compared to treatment with TMZ alone, which did not translate into prolonged survival in our study population.     

Prospective randomized trial of the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma using chemotherapy with cisplatin, dacarbazine, and tamoxifen alone or in combination with interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2b.

PURPOSE: The combination of chemotherapy with immunotherapeutic agents such as interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2b has been reported to provide improved treatment results in patients with metastatic melanoma, compared with the use of chemotherapy alone. We have performed a prospective randomized trial in patients with metastatic melanoma, comparing treatment with chemotherapy to treatment with chemoimmunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred two patients with metastatic melanoma were prospectively randomized to receive chemotherapy composed of tamoxifen, cisplatin, and dacarbazine or this same chemotherapy followed by interferon alfa-2b and interleukin-2. Objective responses, survival, and toxicity in the two groups were evaluated at a median potential follow-up of 42 months. RESULTS: In 52 patients randomized to receive chemotherapy, there were 14 objective responses (27%), including four complete responses. In 50 patients randomized to receive chemoimmunotherapy, there were 22 objective responses (44%) (P2 = .071), including three complete responses. In both treatment groups, the duration of partial responses was often short, and there was a trend toward a survival advantage for patients receiving chemotherapy alone (P2 = .052; median survival of 15.8 months compared with 10.7 months). Treatment-related toxicities were greater in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy. CONCLUSION: With the treatment regimens used in this study, the addition of immunotherapy to combination chemotherapy increased toxicity but did not increase survival. The use of combination chemoimmunotherapy regimens is not recommended in the absence of well-designed, prospective, randomized protocols showing the benefit of this treatment strategy.     

Randomized phase III trial of vinblastine, bleomycin, and cis-dichlorodiammine-platinum versus dacarbazine in malignant melanoma

A randomized phase III study was carried out in 57 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with either dacarbazine (DTIC) given intravenously (IV) daily for 10 days using light protection, or a combination of vinblastine IV on days 1 and 2, bleomycin by continuous IV infusion during days 1-5, and cisplatin by IV infusion on day 5 (VBD). Objective response rates were similar: 14% for dacarbazine and 10% for VBD. However, dacarbazine responses were associated with a trend toward longer progression-free intervals and longer survival. Toxicity was significantly greater in the VBD arm, and fatal in two patients. Dacarbazine was also associated with severe toxicity by the 10-day light-protected schedule used here. VBD is not as effective as previously reported, and dacarbazine remains a standard of therapy for metastatic melanoma.     

Improved results with the addition of interferon alfa-2b to dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma

Sixty-four patients with histologically confirmed metastatic malignant melanoma were entered on a prospectively controlled randomized trial. Patients received dacarbazine (DTIC) alone or DTIC plus interferon (IFN) alfa-2b. Patients were reasonably balanced with respect to age, sex, performance status (PS), site of metastases, and number of metastatic sites. Objective response (complete plus partial remission [CR + PR]) was documented in six patients on DTIC and in 16 patients on DTIC plus IFN alfa-2b. Median time to treatment failure (TTF) and median survival are significantly better on the combination arm, with some long-term CRs observed. More toxicity was encountered in the combination arm, which was acceptable except in three patients where treatment was discontinued because of IFN toxicity.     

Survival advantage for carboplatin substituting cisplatin in combination with vindesine and mitomycin C for stage IIIB and IV squamous-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: a randomized phase III study

This communication represents the definitive report of a randomized phase III study comparing cisplatin and carboplatin, in combination with vindesine and mitomycin C in stage IIIB and IV squamous-cell bronchogenic carcinoma. A total of 221 patients entered the study and were randomized into two arms. Of these, 114 patients (109 evaluable for activity) were randomized to arm A, receiving cisplatin 120 mg/m(2), mitomycin C 8 mg/m(2) and vindesine 3 mg/m(2) per cycle; 107 patients (101 evaluable for activity) were randomized to arm B receiving carboplatin 500 mg/m(2) with the same doses of mitomycin C and vindesine per cycle. Patients with progressive disease (PD) were excluded from the study after the 2nd cycle, and those with stable disease (SD), partial response (PR) and complete response (CR) received six cycles of chemotherapy (or less in case of early progression). Patients were stratified according to the clinical stage (IIIB vs. IV), performance status (0+1 vs. 2+3) and tumor histological grade (I+II vs. III). In the cisplatin arm two patients (1.9%) achieved a CR, 38 (34.9%) a PR, 45 (41.2%) a SD and 24 (22.0%) had PD; the overall response rate was 40/109 (36.8%). In the carboplatin arm five patients (5.0%) achieved a CR, 31 (30.7%) a PR, 40 (39.6%) a SD, and 25 (24.7%) had PD; the overall response rate was 36/101 (35.7%). No statistically significant difference in response rate was present between the two arms, and the response rate was not influenced by performance status, histological grade or clinical stage. The Kaplan-Meyers curves displayed a significant advantage both for time to progression (P=0.005) and overall survival (P=0.008) for patients in the carboplatin arm. The advantage for patients receiving carboplatin instead of cisplatin appeared evident in univariate setting for patients with a good performance status and clinical stage IV, and occurred irrespectively of tumor histological grade; response duration and survival of responders was identical in the two arms. Patients achieving a stable disease survived longer in the carboplatin than in the cisplatin arm (P=0.012). Thus, substitution of cisplatin by carboplatin in the combination chemotherapy regimen, although more hematologically toxic (but less emetogenic) resulted in a similar response rate, but a significantly longer time to progression and overall survival.     

Multicenter phase III randomized trial of polychemotherapy (CVD regimen) versus the same chemotherapy (CT) plus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha2b in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The addition of cytokines to chemotherapy (CT) has obtained encouraging but contradictory results in metastatic melanoma. In this phase III trial, we compared the effects of CT [cisplatin, vindesine and dacarbazine (CVD)] with those of concurrent biochemotherapy (bioCT) consisting of CVD plus interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha2b. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 151 untreated metastatic melanoma patients were randomized, 75 on arm A (cisplatin 30 mg/m2 on days 1-3, vindesine 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1 and dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 on days 1-3), and 76 on arm B (same CVD scheme plus interferon-alpha2b on days 1-5 and interleukin-2 on days 1-5 and 8-15, both administered subcutaneously), either recycled every 3 weeks. Response was assessed every two cycles. RESULTS: Ten percent of the patients were alive at a median of 52 months from start of therapy. We observed a response rate (RR) of 21% on arm A versus 33% on arm B; three patients (4%) given bioCT had complete responses (CRs). Median time to progression (TTP) was identical; median overall survival (OS) time was 12 months on arm A and 11 months on arm B. CONCLUSIONS: BioCT is not better than CT alone; the trend in favor of the bioCT in terms of RR did not translate into better TTP or OS. Therefore, bioCT cannot be recommended as standard first-line therapy for metastatic melanoma.     

Dacarbazine, cisplatin, and interferon-alfa-2b with or without interleukin-2 in metastatic melanoma: a randomized phase III trial (18951) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Melanoma Group.

BACKGROUND: Based on phase II trial results, chemoimmunotherapy combinations have become the preferred treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma in many institutions. This study was performed to determine whether interleukin-2 (IL-2) as a component of chemoimmunotherapy influences survival of patients with metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 combined with interferon-alfa-2b 10 x 10(6) U/m2 subcutaneously on days 1 through 5 without (arm A) or with (arm B) a high-dose intravenous decrescendo regimen of IL-2 on days 5 through 10 (18 x 10(6) U/m2/6 hours, 18 x 10(6) U/m2/12 hours, 18 x 10(6) U/m2/24 hours, and 4.5 x 10(6) U/m2 for 3 x 24 hours). Treatment cycles were repeated in the absence of disease progression every 28 days to a maximum of four cycles. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-three patients with advanced metastatic melanoma were accrued. The median survival was 9 months in both arms, with a 2-year survival rate of 12.9% and 17.6% in arms A and B, respectively (P = .32; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.11). There was also no statistically significant difference regarding progression-free survival (median, 3.0 v 3.9 months) and response rate (22.8% v 20.8%). CONCLUSION: Despite its activity in melanoma as a single agent or in combination with interferon-alfa-2b, the chosen schedule of IL-2 added to the chemoimmunotherapy combination had no clinically relevant activity.     

Paclitaxel and tamoxifen: An active regimen for patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: In early trials of paclitaxel administered as a 24-hour infusion, an overall response rate of 16% was reported for patients with metastatic melanoma. Paclitaxel is a natural product-based agent and is thus subject to the problem of multidrug resistance (MDR). Tamoxifen is an agent that can abrogate MDR and potentially enhance the effect of paclitaxel. A Phase II trial of the combination was undertaken with previously treated patients. METHODS: Patients with metastatic cutaneous or mucosal melanoma who were previously treated with the Dartmouth chemotherapy regimen (dacarbazine, carmustine, cisplatin, and tamoxifen) were evaluated. Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 hours every 3 weeks. All patients also took tamoxifen 40 mg orally daily. Treatment continued until disease progression. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients completed at least two cycles of paclitaxel and were evaluable for response. Five responses were observed, 1 complete response, and 4 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 24%. The combination was well tolerated. The most common nonhematologic side effects were myalgia and paresthesia. Hematologic toxicity was mild. No patients developed neutropenic fever. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a Phase II trial evaluating paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion in melanoma patients. The 3-hour infusion is well tolerated and results in little myelosuppression and minimal neurotoxicity. The contribution of tamoxifen is difficult to evaluate because plasma levels were not measured. It is possible that a higher response rate might be observed with larger doses of tamoxifen. Further investigation of paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma is warranted.     

Biochemotherapy in patients with metastatic anorectal mucosal melanoma

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic anorectal melanoma generally have an unfavorable prognosis, but no effective systemic therapy has been reported. METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated the medical records of all patients with metastatic anorectal melanoma treated with biochemotherapy between January 1991 and December 2001 at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). RESULTS: The search yielded 18 patients. Of these patients, 14 had undergone treatment with cisplatin (CDDP), vinblastine (VB), dacarbazine (DTIC), interferon alpha-2b (IFN), and interleukin 2 (IL-2); 2 had undergone treatment with CDDP, VB, DTIC, and IFN; 1 had undergone treatment with CDDP, IFN, and IL-2; and 1 had undergone treatment with CDDP, VB, temozolomide, IFN, and IL-2. All IL-2 treatments were administered intravenously. The median follow-up time was 12.2 months (range, 3.5-43.7 months). Eight patients (44%) had major responses, including two (11%) complete responses (CRs). Three patients were lost to follow-up evaluation after the completion of treatment. The median time to progression among the 15 remaining patients was 6.2 months. Four patients, including 1 with a CR, were alive at their last documented follow-up visits (survival: 14.0, 20.7, 31.3, and 43.7 months, respectively). The median overall survival was 12.2 months. Among 13 patients who received biochemotherapy as first-line systemic therapy, 6 patients (46%) had major responses, including two (15%) CRs. The median time to progression for this group was 6.2 months, and the median overall survival was 12.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Biochemotherapy had substantial activity against metastatic anorectal melanoma and should be considered for use in the treatment of metastatic disease from primary anorectal melanoma.     

Complete remission of brain metastases in three patients with stage IV melanoma treated with BOLD and G-CSF

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are the most life-threatening among the secondary localizations of melanoma for their unresponsiveness to the surgical, radiotherapeutic and/or chemotherapeutic treatments. METHODS: Accidentally, we observed a complete response (CR) in a patient undergoing chemotherapy with bleomycin, vincristine or Oncovin, CCNU or lomustine, dacarbazine (BOLD) regimen for metastatic melanoma including brain metastases, who was also treated with G-CSF to manage a concomitant leukopenia. After this observation, seven more patients with stage IV melanoma with brain metastases were treated with BOLD regimen repeated every 6 weeks with administration of G-CSF in the intervals. RESULTS: Three patients presented CR (37.5%). Two patients stopped the treatment after two courses for evident progressive disease (25%). The other three patients showed stable disease (SD: 37.5%). Median duration of SD was 24 weeks. Among the eight patients, six (75%) achieved clinical benefit. Median time to progression was 8.5 months (range 0-74+ months). Median survival was 12.5 months (range 4-74+ months). Two patients are still alive and disease-free after 74 and 57 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: We believe that the brilliant CR, the long duration of the disease-free intervals and the long survival in at least three of eight patients should encourage further research on BOLD with G-CSF for the treatment of advanced melanoma.     

Circulating levels of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with chemoimmunotherapy alone or combined with bevacizumab

There are no identified biomarkers that could predict response to antiangiogenic or traditional chemoimmunotherapy in metastatic melanoma. We hypothesized that soluble angiogenic factor receptors might help us to identify patients responsive to treatment. A series of 48 patients with stage IV melanoma participating in two phase II clinical trials were included. The trials included treatment with carboplatin, vinorelbine, and subcutaneous interleukin-2 (n=22) or treatment with bevacizumab, dacarbazine, and low-dose interferon-α2a (n=26).Serum samples were prospectively collected and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (s-VEGFR-1) and 2 (s-VEGFR-2) were measured before starting the trial treatment and during response evaluation.There was a trend toward longer overall survival among patients with higher-than-median serum VEGFR-1 levels (21.3 months) compared with 12.3 months in patients with low pretreatment s-VEGFR-1 levels (P=0.146). Pretreatment s-VEGFR-2 levels did not correlate to survival. Serum VEGFR-2 levels decreased during therapy in 44% of the patients and increased in 56% of the patients. VEGFR-2 increased in 78% (14 of 18) of the patients who progressed during therapy (P=0.017). VEGFR-2 decrease was associated with clinical benefit in 65% of the patients (11 of 17) and with progression in only four patients (P=0.016).High pretreatment levels of s-VEGFR-1 are associated with improved prognosis among patients with metastatic melanoma independently on therapy, whereas increased VEGFR-2 levels during therapy are associated with disease progression. These markers might be useful in selecting patients responsive to antiangiogenic therapy.