Identification of αβ and γδ T Cell Receptor-Positive Cells

Two lineages of T lymphocytes bearing the CD3 antigen can be defined on the basis of the nature of the heterodimeric receptor chain (alpha beta or gamma delta T cell receptor (TCR) expressed. Precise identification of alpha beta and gamma delta TCR+ cells is essential when studying the tissue distribution and function of these different T cells. In immunofluorescence studies gamma delta TCR+ cells have been identified as CD3+WT-31- or CD3+CD4-CD8- cells. However, this may not be the optimal procedure because gamma delta TCR+ cells are weakly WT-31+, and some are CD8+. The aim of this study was to evaluate a panel of monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) directed against different chains of the TCR-T3 complex for a more precise identification of alpha beta+ and gamma delta TCR+ cells in flow cytometric studies. We found that the MoAb anti-Ti-gamma A and delta-TCS-1, recognizing the TCR-gamma and the TCR-delta chain respectively, only reacted with a subpopulation of gamma delta TCR+ cells, whereas another TCR-delta chain recognizing MoAb anti-TCR-delta 1 reacted with all gamma delta TCR+ cells. All MoAb reported to belong to the CD3 group reacted with both alpha beta TCR+ and gamma delta TCR+ cells as expected. Our results indicate that all gamma delta TCR+ cells can be identified with the MoAb anti-TCR-delta 1. Because no MoAb recognizing the TCR-alpha or TCR-beta chains at the cell surface of intact cells are yet available, we suggest that alpha beta TCR+ cells could be identified as CD3+ anti-TCR-delta 1-cells.     

Integrated morphogen signal inputs in γδ versus αβ T-cell differentiation

Summary:  Morphogens, a class of secreted proteins that regulate gene expression in a concentration-dependent manner, are responsible for directing nearly all lineage fate choices during embryogenesis. In the thymus, morphogen signal pathways consisting of WNT, Hedgehog, and the transforming growth factor-β superfamily are active and have been implicated in various developmental processes including proliferation, survival, and differentiation of maturing thymocytes. Intriguingly, it has been inferred that some of these morphogen signal pathways differentially affect γδ and αβ T-cell development or maintenance, but their role in T-cell lineage commitment has not been directly probed. We have recently identified a modulator of morphogen signaling that significantly influences binary γδ versus αβ T-cell lineage diversification. In this review, we summarize functions of morphogens in the thymus and provide a highly speculative model of integrated morphogen signals, potentially directing the γδ versus αβ T-cell fate determination process.     

γδ and αβ T Cells are Equally Susceptible to Apoptosis

Gamma/delta TCR bearing T lymphocytes represent a T-cell subset whose functional relevance remains unclear. Nevertheless these T cells may play a role in the early immune reponse against bacteria. Until now the regulatory mechanisms on this response have not been investigated. The study described here evaluated the immunoregulatory effects of Interleukin-10 on γ/δ and α/β TCR-positive T-cell clones and freshly isolated peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). IL-10 has been shown previously to inhibit lectin and antigen-induced proliferation and cytokine production by α/β T cells. The results outlined below show that rhIL-10 strongly inhibits lectin-induced production of IFN-γ, TNF-α. IL-2, and to a lesser degree proliferation and IL-4 production of both T-cell subsets. As IL-10 did not inhibit proliferation but at the same time strongly suppressed cytokine production in various experiments, the hypothesis that it could function as a growth factor for human T cells as has been described for murine thymoeytes was tested. The data demonstrate that, although the γ/δ T-cell clones tested do not produce IL-10 they can use it as a growth factor in combination with IL-2, IL-4 or alone. Furthermore, IL-10 has the same properties on human α/β T-cell clones and PBMC. In summary, it is shown that IL-10 has pleiotropic effects on γ/δ and α/β TCR⁺ T cells by inhibiting lectin-induced cytokine production and by acting as a growth factor for these cells alone or in combination with IL-2 or IL-4.     

Recent insights into the signals that control αβ/γδ-lineage fate

Summary:  During thymopoiesis, two major types of mature T cells are generated that can be distinguished by the clonotypic subunits contained within their T-cell receptor (TCR) complexes: αβ T cells and γδ T cells. Although there is no consensus as to the exact developmental stage where αβ and γδ T-cell lineages diverge, γδ T cells and precursors to the αβ T-cell lineage (bearing the pre-TCR) are thought to be derived from a common CD4⁻CD8⁻ double-negative precursor. The role of the TCR in αβ/γδ lineage commitment has been controversial, in particular whether different TCR isotypes intrinsically favor adoption of the corresponding lineage. Recent evidence supports a signal strength model of lineage commitment, whereby stronger signals promote γδ development and weaker signals promote adoption of the αβ fate, irrespective of the TCR isotype from which the signals originate. Moreover, differences in the amplitude of activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase- mitogen-activated protein kinase-early growth response pathway appear to play a critical role. These findings will be placed in context of previous analyses in an effort to more precisely define the signals that control T-lineage fate during thymocyte development.     

αβ and γδ T-cell networks and their roles in natural resistance to viral infections

Summary: Lymphocyte-mediated inflammation is a hallmark of autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis and sarcoidosis. However, this type of inflammation probably developed under evolutionary pressure from pathogenic microorganisms, such as mycobacteria and other intracellular infective agents. One such pathogen, the gram-positive bacterium Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes), induces a cascade of tissue alterations that ultimately results in the eradication of the bacteria associated with a granulomatous response. Consequently, murine listeriosis has been established as a model to analyze not only T-cell-dependent antibacterial protection but also T-cell-mediated mononuclear inflammation in parenchymal organs. Extensive studies of the molecular basis of the latter phenomenon led to the conclusion that the most decisive step from non-specific microabscess formation to granulomatous inflammation is the activation of non-specifically invading CD4⁺ T cells, which results in high local concentrations of TNF-α and IFN-γ in the presence of IL-2. This in turn induces CD11b-independent mechanisms of intraparenchymal monocyte accumulation. Because any attempt to neutralize the effects of TNF-α and IFN-γ to modulate T-cell-mediated inflammation will also dramatically decrease host resistance, other anti-inflammatory strategies based on the modulation of TNF-α and IFN-γ-induced mechanisms of monocyte accumulation must be developed. Recalling the classical work by Dienes & Schoenheit on the induction d bacterial allergies (1), the cytokine phenotype of granuloma formation also has implications as regards the most potent adjuvant environment for the development of a T-cell response. The murine listeriosis model is the basis for all conclusions in this article on the role of cytokines in the induction and expression of T-cell-mediated inflammation and. as we will show, promises to yield still more insights into the rational design of vaccines.     

An architectural perspective on signaling by the pre-, αβ and γδ T cell receptors

The T cell antigen receptor (TCR) is a multimeric complex composed of an antigen‐binding clonotypic heterodimer and a signal transducing complex consisting of the CD3 dimers (CD3γε and CD3δε) and a TCR‐ζ homodimer. In all jawed vertebrates there are two T cell lineages, αβ and γδ, distinguished by the clonotypic subunits contained within their TCRs (TCR‐α and ‐β or TCR‐γ and ‐δ, respectively). A third receptor complex, the preTCR, is only expressed on immature T cells. The preTCR, which contains the invariant pre‐Tα (pTα) chain in lieu of TCR‐α, plays a critical role in the early development of αβ lineage cells. The subunit composition of the signal transducing complexes of the pre‐, αβ‐ and γδTCRs was previously thought to be identical. However, recent data demonstrate that there are significant differences in the signal transducing complexes of these three TCRs. For example, αβTCRs contain both CD3γε and CD3δε dimers, whereas γδTCRs contain only CD3γε dimers. Moreover, preTCR function appears to be unaffected in the absence of CD3δ, suggesting that CD3δε dimers are dispensable for pre‐TCR assembly. In this review, we summarize current data relating to the subunit composition of the pre‐, αβ‐ and γδTCRs and discuss how these structural differences may impact receptor signaling and αβ/γδ lineage determination.     

Antigen recognition by γδ T cells

Summary:  γδ T cells contribute to host immune competence uniquely. This is most likely because they have distinctive antigen-recognition properties. While the basic organization of γδ T-cell receptor (TCR) loci is similar to that of αβ TCR loci, there is a striking difference in how the diversity of γδ TCRs is generated. γδ and αβ T cells have different antigen-recognition requirements and almost certainly recognize a different set of antigens. While it is unclear what most γδ T cells recognize, the non-classical major histocompatibility complex class I molecules T10 and T22 were found to be the natural ligands for a sizable population (0.2–2%) of murine γδ T cells. The recognition of T10/T22 may be a way by which γδ T cells regulate cells of the immune system, and this system has been used to determine the antigen-recognition determinants of γδ T cells. T10/T22-specific γδ T cells have TCRs that are diverse in both V gene usage and CDR3 sequences. Their Vγ usage reflects their tissue origin, and their antigen specificity is conferred by a motif in the TCR δ chain that is encoded by V and D segments and by P-nucleotide addition. Sequence variations around this motif modulate affinities between TCRs and T10/T22. That this CDR3 motif is important in antigen recognition is confirmed by the crystal structure of a γδ TCR bound to its ligand. The significance of these observations is discussed in the context of γδ T-cell biology.     

γδ T-cell receptors: functional correlations

Summary:  The γδ T-cell receptors (TCRs) are limited in their diversity, suggesting that their natural ligands may be few in number. Ligands for γδTCRs that have thus far been determined are predominantly of host rather than foreign origin. Correlations have been noted between the Vγ and/or Vδ genes a γδ T cell expresses and its functional role. The reason for these correlations is not yet known, but several different mechanisms are conceivable. One possibility is that interactions between particular TCR-V domains and ligands determine function or functional development. However, a recent study showed that at least for one ligand, receptor specificity is determined by the complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) component of the TCR-δ chain, regardless of the Vγ and/or Vδ. To determine what is required in the TCR for other specificities and to test whether recognition of certain ligands is connected to cell function, more γδTCR ligands must be defined. The use of recombinant soluble versions of γδTCRs appears to be a promising approach to finding new ligands, and recent results using this method are reviewed.     

Development and selection of γδ T cells

Summary:  Two main lineages of T cells develop in the thymus: those that express the αβ T-cell receptor (TCR) and those that express the γδ TCR. Whereas the development, selection, and peripheral localization of newly differentiated αβ T cells are understood in some detail, these processes are less well characterized in γδ T cells. This review describes research carried out in this laboratory and others, which addresses several key aspects of γδ T-cell development, including the decision of precursor cells to differentiate into the γδ versus αβ lineage, the ordered differentiation over the course of ontogeny of functional γδ T-cell subsets expressing distinct TCR structures, programming of ordered Vγ gene rearrangement in the thymus, including a molecular switch that ensures appropriate Vγ rearrangements at the appropriate stage of development, positive selection in the thymus of γδ T cells destined for the epidermis, and the acquisition by developing γδ T cells of cues that determine their correct localization in the periphery. This research suggests a coordination of molecularly programmed events and cellular selection, which enables specialization of the thymus for production of distinct T-cell subsets at different stages of development.     

γδ T-Cell Precursor-Derived CD4− CD8−αβ T Cells Retain γδ Cell Function

We have previously shown that some of the DNαβ⁺ T cells arising in TcRα-chain transgenic mice are of γδ T cell origin, based on phenotypic data and on their status of TcR gene rearrangements. In the present report we investigated the impact of αβ TcR expression on the functional programme of the mature γδ precursor-derived DNαβ⁺ T cells. Our results demonstrate that both their proliferative capacity and their cytokine production profile are similar to that of γδ T cells. Furthermore, both transgenic DNαβ⁺ T cells and DNγδ⁺ T cells up-regulate CD8α expression after activation, but, in contrast to CD4⁺αβ T cells, are unable to induce proliferation of naive B cells. Thus, our results suggest that the effector functions of mature T cells are determined independently of the TcR isotype, probably at an early stage of differentiation, and thereby have important implications for current models of T-cell lineage commitment.     

Bio-histochemical aspects of integrins (α2β1, α6β1) in invasive mammary carcinomas: An immunohistochemical study

Immunohistochemical expression of integrins was examined in 39 human invasive mammary carcinomas, of which 34.2% and 43.6% expressed integrins α2β1 and α6β1, respectively. Immuno-electron microscopy clearly demonstrated that the integrins were in the cell membrane of the carcinoma cells. Similar expression of integrin α2β1 or α6β1 in both the intraductal component and invasive portion of the same tumor was seen in 76.9% and 85.7% of cases, respectively. This suggested that invasive carcinoma cells retained their integrin expression after invasion through the basement membrane. Reciprocal expression of integrins α2β1 and α6β1 was seen in 20 cases. Expression of α2β1 was seen significantly less frequently in scirrhous carcinoma than in the more differentiated papillotubular or solid tubular carcinoma (Chi-squared test, P < 0.05). Intraductal components of carcinoma were present more frequently in cases expressing integrin α2β1 than in those that were negative. This suggests the potential usefulness of integrins as clinical parameters in the surgical treatment of mammary carcinomas, since recent trials of conservative treatment for mammary carcinoma have focused on the intraductal spread of the tumor cells.