Growth hormone response to GHRH, GHRP-6 and GHRH+GHRP-6 in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE A number of long-term research studies are in progress to evaluate the effects of treatment with GH on growth and final height in children with short stature but no demonstrable abnormality of GH secretion. Such treatment is invasive, expensive and carries some risk to the child. An early indication of growth response would allow restriction of treatment to those children most likely to benefit, but anthropometric measurements are relatively subjective, insensitive and imprecise. The aim of this study was to evaluate bone alkaline phosphatase, procollagen Type I C-terminal propeptide, procollagen Type III N-terminal propeptide and the cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of Type I collagen as early biochemical predictors of height velocity response to growth-promoting treatments in short normal children. DESIGN A prospective intervention study, partially placebo controlled on a double blind basis. PATIENTS Fifty healthy children with familial short stature or constitutional delay in growth and puberty (8 girls, 42 boys, ages 5.5–16.5 years and all either prepubertal (45) or in very early puberty (5 boys) at the start of treatment) were treated with placebo (6), GH alone (32), GH plus oxandrolone (8) or GH plus testosterone (4). MEASUREMENTS Bone alkaline phosphatase and the collagen markers were measured at the start of treatment and 3 months later. Height velocity was calculated at the start of treatment and again after one year. RESULTS Pre-treatment biochemical marker concentrations did not predict height velocity response after one year. Increments in all markers after 3 months were significantly correlated with height velocity increments after one year of treatment, the highest correlations being observed for bone alkaline phosphatase (r = 0.67, P < 0.0001) and procollagen Type III N-terminal propeptide (r = 0.57, P < 0.0001). Highly significant correlations (P < 0.0001) were also observed between bone alkaline phosphatase and procollagen Type I C-terminal propeptide (r = 0.55) and between procollagen Type III N-terminal propeptide and the cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide of Type I collagen (r = 0.62). Multiple linear regression with stepwise selection of variables identified bone alkaline phosphatase and procollagen Type III N-terminal propeptide as the only two independent variables that contributed significantly to the prediction of height velocity response after one year (analysis of variance, P < 0.0001). Together they predicted 59% of the variability in height velocity response after a year. CONCLUSIONS The best early predic tors of height velocity response were bone alkaline phosphatase (a protein found in hypertrophic chondrocytes in the epiphyseal growth plate, in calcifying matrix vesicles and in mature osteoblasts) and procollagen Type III N-terminal propeptide, a marker of interstitial fibril biosynthesis in soft tissues. Using these markers, GH treatment could be targeted to those children most likely to benefit in the medium term.     

Evaluation of the reproducibility of the GHRH plus GHRP-6 test of growth hormone reserve in adults

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) is controversial, relying on GH secretion elicited by the provocative tests of GH reserve. However, the performance of most of the tests in use have not been evaluated rigorously. The repeatability of a test is a prerequisite before evaluating its diagnostic capability. OBJECTIVE: The combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) is an efficacious test of GH reserve in adults, and the target of this work was to evaluate its reproducibility. METHODS: Seventeen healthy subjects were challenged with GHRH plus GHRP-6 (1 micro g/kg i.v.). All subjects underwent four tests on different days separated by at least 2 months. GH peaks were evaluated by several mathematical analyses of reproducibility. RESULTS: As a group, the subjects showed high reproducibility after the four tests, with GH peaks of 46.0 +/- 5.1; 48.4 +/- 6.4; 50.1 +/- 5.4 and 52.9 +/- 5.8 micro g/l, respectively (1 micro g/l = 3 mU/l). Individually analysed, the reproducibility was good, and the regression analysis showed a correlation between tests 1 and 2 of R = 0.729, P < 0.0009, between tests 1 and 3 of R = 0.710, P < 0.001, and between tests 1 and 4 of R = 0.683, P < 0.002. Under mathematical analysis, the multiple correlation coefficient analysis, analysis of variance (anova) with repeated measurements, repeatability index, the simplest coefficient of variation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) all unambiguously showed that the GHRH + GHRP-6 test was reproducible. Furthermore, the repeated tests did not alter the biochemical diagnosis of the subjects, with absence of false-positive values. CONCLUSIONS: The GHRH + GHRP-6 test of GH reserve is reproducible in adult subjects.     

Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults by testing with GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GHRH: comparison with the insulin tolerance test

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults should be made using provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is recommended as the gold standard investigation. Because of the risk of serious complications, patients with epilepsy or known ischemic heart disease should not undergo this test. GHRP-6 is a synthetic hexapeptide that releases GH by binding to specific hypothalamic and pituitary receptors. We assessed the diagnostic capability of GH stimulation by GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GHRH in comparison to the results of an ITT. DESIGN: Twenty patients underwent an ITT for suspected pituitary or adrenal disease. Either GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg) alone, or GHRP-6 in combination with GHRH (1 microg/kg) were administered on different days. Blood samples were obtained during a subsequent 90-min period for measurement of GH. RESULTS: Ten patients had a GH peak response of less than 3 microg/l during ITT and were considered growth hormone deficient (GHD). The GH mean peak (+/-S.E.M., range) in this group was 0.7 microg/l (+/-0.3, 0.1-2.9) compared with 14.5 microg/l (+/-3.5, 3.8-40.8) in the group of patients with a GH peak response of more than 3 microg/l (growth hormone sufficient (GS)). For the GHRP-6 test, the GH mean peak was 1.3 microg/l (+/-0.6, 0.1-6.7) in the GHD group versus 25.7 microg/l (+/-5.5, 7.7-54.2) in the GS group. After GHRP-6+GHRH, the GH mean peaks were 4.0 microg/l (+/-1.3, 0.2-11.9) versus 54.7 microg/l (+/-11.1, 13.9-136.0) respectively. During administration of GHRP-6, the only side effects observed were flush symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Peak GH levels below 7 microg/l for the GHRP-6 test and below 13 microg/l for the combined GHRP-6+GHRH test identified all patients with GH deficiency correctly as defined by ITT. The results suggest that testing with GHRP-6 or GHRP-6+GHRH is as sensitive and specific as an ITT for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency.     

Different degrees of GH deficiency evidenced by GHRH+arginine test and IGF-I levels in adults with pituritary disease

To verify if the entity of the peak GH responses to the GHRH+arginine (ARG) test is able to show different degree forms of GH deficiency (GHD), we linked these responses with the number of other anterior pituitary deficits. These anterior pituitary deficits were also related with IGF-I levels. To this purpose, we studied a large cohort of lean patients with pituitary disease of different etiologies [86 males and 68 females; age: mean +/- SEM 41.5 +/- 1.2 yr, body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2]. The patients were subdivided into 4 groups according to the increasing number of hormone deficiencies: isolated GHD (HYPO1, no.=28) or GHD plus one, two or three additional hormones (gonadotrophin, ACTH, and TSH) deficiencies (HYPO2, no.=20; HYPO3, no.=15; HYPO4, no.=91). Peak GH responses to the GHRH+ARG test and IGF-I levels showed a clear difference among the groups (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). A significant difference was found between HYPO1 and HYPO4 for IGF-I levels (p < 0.05), and between HYPO1 and HYPO4 and between HYPO2 and HYPO4 for the GHRH+ARG test (p < 0.005). Considering only the patients who underwent both GHRH+ARG test and insulin tolerance test (ITT) (no.=70), the pattern of the peak GH responses to the GHRH+ARG test was the same of the whole group of patients, while no statistical difference was found with ITT. Our data show that the peak GH responses to the GHRH+ARG test and the IGF-I levels are linked to the severity of hypopituitarism, expressed by the number of increasing anterior pituitary deficits. This association is lost if the evaluation of the GH status is performed by the ITT. In all, the GHRH+ARG test and measurement of IGF-I are able to evidence different degrees of GHD in adult patients with pituitary disease.     

Effect of obesity and morbid obesity on the growth hormone (GH) secretion elicited by the combined GHRH + GHRP-6 test

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is characterized by low basal levels of growth hormone (GH) and impeded GH release. However, the main problem arises in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults, as all accepted cut-offs in the diagnostic tests of GH reserve are no longer valid in obese subjects. In this work, the role of obesity in the GH response elicited by the GHRH + GHRP-6 test was assessed in a large population of obese and nonobese subjects. PATIENTS: GHRH + GHRP-6-induced GH peaks were evaluated in 542 subjects. One hundred and five were healthy obese, 50 were morbid obese, and 261 were nonobese (both normal weight and overweight). One hundred and seventy-six GH-deficient patients (obese and nonobese) were also studied. RESULTS: A regression analysis of the 366 subjects with normal pituitary function indicated that adiposity had a negative effect on the elicited GH peak (r = -0.503, P < 0.0001). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that in subjects with a BMI < or =35, the currently accepted cut-offs of the GHRH + GHRP-6 test (GH peaks > or =20 microg/l: normal secretion; GH peaks < or =10 microg/l: GH deficiency), were fully operative. However, in subjects with a BMI > 35, normality was indicated by GH peaks > or =15 microg/l and GH deficiency by peaks < or =5 microg/l (1 microg/l = 2.6 mU/l). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms: (a) that the combined provocative test is adequate to separate normal and GH-deficient subjects; (b) the negative effect of obesity on GH secretion; (c) that obesity accounts for 25% of the reduction of GH release; and (d) that present cut-off values are applicable to normal weight, overweight and grade I obesity subjects, whereas in obese subjects with a BMI exceeding 35, all the normative limits of the GHRH-GHRP +6 test must be reduced by 5 microg/l.     

The GHRH/GHRP-6 test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in elderly or severely obese men

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Ageing and obesity result in decreased activity of the GH/IGF-I axis and concomitant impaired GH responses to secretory stimuli. We therefore determined the validity of the GH cut-off value of 15.0 microg/l in the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)/GH releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in elderly or severely obese men. METHODS: We performed a combined GHRH/GHRP-6 test in ten elderly men (mean age 74 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 24.6 kg/m(2)), nine obese men (mean age 47 years; mean BMI 40.6 kg/m(2)) and seven healthy male controls (mean age 51 years, mean BMI 24.3 kg/m(2)). After assessment of fasting plasma GH, IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), GHRH (100 microg) and GHRP-6 (93 microg) were given intravenously as a bolus injection. Repeated GH measurements were performed for two hours. RESULTS: Both peak GH levels and areas under the curve (AUC) were significantly lower in the obese than in the controls (peak 13.2 vs 53.4 microg/l, P = 0.001; AUC 707 vs 3250 microg/l x 120 min; P = 0.001). Mean GH response in the elderly was lower than in the controls (peak 35.0 microg/l; AUC 2274 microg/l x 120 min), but this was not statistically significant. In contrast, GH peak levels in seven obese men remained below the cut-off level of 15.0 microg/l associated with severe GH deficiency. All others had GH peak levels exceeding this threshold. IGFBP-3 levels were significantly lower in the elderly than in the controls (1.35 vs 2.05 mg/l, P = 0.001). Baseline GH or IGF-I did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: GH responses following GHRH/GHRP-6 administration were significantly reduced in severely obese men, but were not significantly reduced in elderly men, despite a negative trend. Our data indicate that the cut-off GH level of 15.0 microg/l after GHRH + GHRP-6 administration for the diagnosis of severe GH deficiency cannot be used in severely obese men.     

Growth hormone secretion after the administration of GHRP-6 or GHRH combined with GHRP-6 does not decline in late adulthood

OBJECTIVE Growth hormone (GH) secretion in middle and late adulthood declines with age. However, the precise mechanisms causing this impairment in OH release are unknown. HIs-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH₂(GHRP-6) Is a synthetic compound that releases OH in a dose related and specific manner in several species, including man. In order to gain a further Insight Into disrupted GH secretion in late adulthood, we evaluated GH responses to GHRP-6 or GHRH, administered either alone or in combination, in healthy young and late adulthood groups of subjects. DESIGN All subjects underwent three different tests carried out in random order and separated by at least one week. Tests were performed at 0900 h after an overnight fast. GHRH (100 μg), GHRP-6 (90 μg) either alone or In combination were administered as an I.v. bolus. SUBJECTS Groups of healthy young (mean ± SEM 22 ± 1·1 years, n= 9) and older adult subjects (59·5 ± 1·7 years, n= 9) were studied. MEASUREMENTS Serum GH levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS In the group of young adult subjects the combined administration of GHRH and GHRP-6 elicited a greater GH increase than GHRH alone (F= 21·9, P < 0·001) or GHRP-6 alone (F= 6·2, P= 0·01). Similarly, the response to the combined stimuli was also greater than with GHRH alone (F= 21·8, P < 0·001) or GHRP-6 alone (F= 23·9, P < 0·001) In the late adulthood group of subjects. OH responses to GHRH were greater in younger than in older subjects (F= 3·45, P= 0·03). In contrast, OH responses to either GHRP-6 (F= 0·71, P= NS) or combined GHRH plus GHRP-6 administration (F= 0·68, P= NS) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS These data show that OH responses to GHRP-6 are much greater than to GHRH In late adulthood. The marked Increase of plasma GH levels observed after administration of GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GHRH Indicates that Impaired GH secretion in late adulthood is a functional and potentially reversible state.     

Growth hormone response to GHRH + GHRP-6 in type 2 diabetes during euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamp

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two different glucose levels on GH response to the combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in patients with type 2 diabetes. GH response to i.v. bolus of GHRH+GHRP-6 (100 mcg, each) was measured in 12 male patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age: 53.9+/-1.59 years; BMI: 25.58+/-0.39 kg/m(2); mean HbA(1c): 8.7+/-0.42%), during a euglycemic (mean glucose: 4.92+/-0.08 mmol) hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate of 100 mU/kg/h) and a hyperglycemic clamp (mean glucose: 12.19+/-0.11 mmol/l). There was no difference in basal GH levels between the hyperglycemic and euglycemic clamps (2.9+/-0.99 mU/l versus 1.48+/-0.44 mU/l; P>0.05). Peak GH response to GHRH+GHRP-6 during the hyperglycemic clamp was lower than in the englycemic clamp (112.45+/-14.45 mU/l versus 151.06+/-16.87 mU/l; P<0.05). Area under the GH curve was lower in the hyperglycemic than in the euglycemic clamp (6974.49+/-1001.95 mU/l/min versus 9560.75+/-1140.65 mU/l/min; P<0.05). It is concluded that hyperglycemia significantly reduces GH response to combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in normal weight patients with type 2 diabetes. It is suggested that ambient glucose levels should be taken into account during interpretation of GH response to combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Growth hormone-releasing hormone combined with arginine or growth hormone secretagogues for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults

Insulin-induced hypoglycemia (ITT) is currently the "gold-standard" test for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD). ITT is often contraindicated, however, particularly in conditions that are also common in patients with suspected GHD. Used alone, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) has no diagnostic value owing to within-subject variability and the inability to distinguish GHD from normal subjects. When combined with arginine, however, GHRH becomes a potent and reproducible test, which is unaffected by gender and aging, showing excellent specificity. The GHRH+ arginine (ARG) test distinguishes GHD patients from normal subjects and is at least as sensitive as ITT, provided that appropriate cutoff limits are considered. Its reliability for retesting GHD has also been demonstrated. The GHRH+ARG test can also be performed in a shorter procedure, resulting in potential for cost reduction. Synthetic GH secretagogues (GHSs) possess a strong and reproducible GH-releasing effect and synergize with GHRH. The combination of GHRH and a peptidyl GHS, such as hexarelin or GH-releasing peptide-6, has recently been shown as another reliable test for the diagnosis of adult GHD, again provided that the cutoff limit is appropriate to the potency of the test. Thus, GHRH combined with either arginine or GHS is a potential tool for the diagnosis of adult GHD.     

A simple test for growth hormone deficiency in adults

GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is a well recognized clinical syndrome that results in significant metabolic and psychological morbidity. GH replacement therapy not only reverses these changes but improves the quality of life and results in a significant improvement in well being. There is no single simple and safe test to assess GHD. GHD in adults is diagnosed biochemically by provocative testing of GH secretion, and the insulin tolerance test (ITT) is accepted to be the test of choice. However, the ITT has many contraindications, needs multiple blood samples, and is potentially dangerous, requiring regular monitoring of patients in a specialized investigation unit. The aim of our study was to evaluate the GH-releasing effect of a combination of the hypothalamic secretagogue GHRH with a small dose of the synthetic peptide GHRP-2, to diagnose GHD. We have compared the GH response to ITT and GHRH/GHRP in a large group of adults with hypothalamic/pituitary disease (n = 36; 22 males and 14 females; age, 18 -59 yr) and in healthy volunteers (n = 30; 15 males and 15 females; age, 22-66 yr). The GHRH/GHRP test produces a measurable GH secretory response in normal, hypopituitary and GH-deficient patients. The test has no side effects. Using the ITT as our 'gold standard' with a GH response of 9 mU/L as our cut-off to define GHD, we compared the clinical efficacy of these two tests. Choosing an arbitrary cut-off of 17 mU/L to define GHD in the GHRH/GHRP test, this new test proved to have 78.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity even when we only used the 30-min datum point.     

The influence of growth hormone on sleep in adults with growth hormone deficiency

Eight patients with isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD), 20-30 years old were studied with polysomnography before and after 6 months of treatment with growth hormone (GH). During GH treatment total sleep time decreased and REM sleep time increased significantly. Delta sleep time (stage 3 + 4) did not change significantly. All patients reported improved well-being and none wished to discontinue the treatment with growth hormone. These findings suggest that GH has an effect on sleep. The effect of increased REM sleep in humans is incompletely understood, but sleep recordings may be one way of directly monitoring the effect of GH on the central nervous system.     

Diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in adults with hypothalamic-pituitary disorders: comparison of test results using pyridostigmine plus GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), clonidine plus GHRH, and insulin-induced hypoglycemia as GH secretagogues

The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is widely accepted as the method of choice to evaluate GH secretion capacity in adults with hypothalamic-pituitary disorders. However, the test is not suitable in the elderly or in patients with cardiovascular disease or seizure disorders. In recent years alternatives to the ITT have been introduced. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic outcome with the ITT, the pyridostigmine plus GHRH (PD + GHRH) test, the clonidine plus GHRH (CLO+GHRH) test, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in an unselected group of patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease. An evaluation of the reproducibility of the different stimulation tests was included in the study. Based on repeated testing with the various GH stimulation tests in healthy adult males and females, the lower limits of normality for the ITT, the PD+GHRH test, and the CLO+GHRH test were 3.92, 12.8, and 19.0, microg/L, respectively. A consecutive group of 26 unselected patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disorders, 13 males and 13 females (median age, 44 ys), were tested twice with all stimulation tests, except that only 10 patients were tested once with the CLO+GHRH test due to side-effects related to clonidine. The peak GH responses between test 1 and test 2 correlated significantly in both the ITT and the PD + GHRH test (P < 0.02), and no significant difference was observed in the median peak response to repeated testing. In addition, no sex difference was observed. The coefficients of variation (CV) were 96% (ITT) and 45% (PD + GHRH), but in the majority of patients low values were repeatedly low. The peak GH response was significantly higher during the PD+GHRH test than during the ITT (P = 0.008). In the 10 patients tested with the PD+GHRH and CLO+GHRH tests there was no significant difference in the peak GH response (P = 0.398). When the test specific cut-off values were used, no significant difference in diagnostic outcome was observed between the various tests (P > 0.3). In contrast, the diagnosis obtained with IGF-I differed significantly from all GH stimulation tests (P < 0.03). Twenty (77%) and 22 (85%) patients were diagnosed to be GH deficient with the ITT and the PD+GHRH test, respectively. Of the 14 patients with multiple pituitary failure (>2 hormones affected), GH deficiency was present in more than 90% regardless of the type of stimulation test used. The IGF-I levels were only subnormal in 42% of the patients and did not correlate with the peak GH responses in any of the stimulation tests (P > 0.05). Except for 1 patient all patients with subnormal IGF-I were GH deficient in all stimulation tests. It is concluded that in patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease and a normal IGF-I level 2 stimulation tests should be performed to establish a diagnosis of GH deficiency. In patients with a subnormal IGF-I value a single GH stimulation test should be sufficient to confirm the presence of GH deficiency.     

Retesting young adults with childhood-onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency with GH-releasing-hormone-plus-arginine test

Within an appropriate clinical context, severe GH deficiency (GHD) in adults has to be defined biochemically by provocative testing of GH secretion. Patients with childhood-onset GHD need retesting in late adolescence or young adulthood to verify whether they have to continue recombinant human GH treatment. GHRH + arginine (GHRH+ARG) is the most reliable alternative to the insulin-induced hypoglycemia test (ITT) as a provocative test for the diagnosis of GHD in adulthood, provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed (normal limits, 16.5 microg/L as 3rd and 9.0 microg/L as 1st centile). We studied the GH response to a single GHRH (1 microg/kg iv) + ARG (0.5 g/kg iv) test in 62 young patients who had undergone GH replacement in childhood, based on the following diagnosis: 1) organic hypopituitarism with GHD (oGHD) In = 18: 15 male (M), 3 female (F); age, 26.8+/-2.2 yr; GH peak < 10 microg/L after two classical tests]; 2) idiopathic isolated GHD (iGHD) [n = 23 (15 M, 8 F); age, 23.0+/-1.5 yr; GH peak < 10 microg/L after two classical tests]; and 3) GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHNSD) [n = 21 (10 M, 11 F); age, 25.1+/-1.6 yr; GH peak > 10 microg/L after classical test but mGHc < 3 microg/L]. The GH responses to GHRH+ARG in these groups were also compared with that recorded in a group of age-matched normal subjects (NS) [n = 48 (20 M, 28 F); age, 27.7+/-0.8 yr]. Insulin-like growth factor I levels in oGHD subjects (61.5+/-13.7 microg/L) were lower (P < 0.001) than those in iGHD subjects (117.2+/-13.1 microg/L); the latter were lower than those in GHNSD subjects (210.2+/-12.9 microg/L), which, in turn, were similar to those in NS (220.9+/-7.1 microg/L). The mean GH peak after GHRH+ARG in oGHD (2.8+/-0.8 microg/L) was lower (P < 0.001) than that in iGHD (18.6+/-4.7 microg/L), which, in turn, was clearly lower (P < 0.001) than that in GHNSD (31.3+/-1.6 microg/L). The GH response in GHNSD was lower than that in NS (65.9+/-5.5 microg/L), but this difference did not attain statistical significance. With respect to the 3rd centile limit of GH response in young adults (i.e. 16.5 microg/L), retesting confirmed GHD in all oGHD, in 65.2% of iGHD, and in none of the GHNSD subjects. With respect to the 1st centile limit of GH response (i.e. 9.0 microg/L), retesting demonstrated severe GHD in 94% oGHD and in 52.1% of iGHD. All oGHD and iGHD with GH peak after GHRH+ARG lower than 9 microg/L had also GH peak lower than 3 microg/L after ITT. In the patients in whom GHD was confirmed by retesting, the mean GH peak after GHRH+ARG was higher than that after ITT (3.4+/-0.5 vs. 1.9+/-0.4). In conclusion, given appropriate cut-off limits, GHRH+ARG is as reliable as ITT for retesting patients who had undergone GH treatment in childhood. Among these patients, severe GHD in adulthood is generally confirmed in oGHD, is frequent in iGHD, but never occurs in GHNSD.     

The influence of growth hormone replacement on heart rate variability in adults with growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone (GH) deficiency is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Abnormalities in heart rate variability (HRV), a surrogate marker of cardiac autonomic tone, have also been found in untreated growth hormone deficient (GHD) patients. Similar abnormalities have been found in patients with complications postmyocardial infarction. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: This study was designed to investigate whether GH treatment leads to normalization of cardiac autonomic tone. HRV measurements were obtained from 15 minute resting ECG recordings in 11 untreated adult GHD patients (7 females; mean age 39.2 years), 10 GHD patients (6 females; mean age 46.2 years) reCENving GH replacement (mean duration, 52.7 months) and 12 healthy controls (7 females; mean age 44.6 +/- 2.9 years) who were all of similar age, weight and BMI. The untreated GHD patients were then commenced on GH and HRV measurements repeated after 3 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: In accord with our previous findings, HRV analysis using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) showed a distinct pattern of abnormality in GHD patients compared with controls. Specifically, there was an increase in nHF power (P = 0.04) and a reduction in nLF power (P = 0.04) (representing parasympathetic and sympathetic activity, respectively), a reduction in nVLF power (P = 0.03) and a 50% reduction in LF/HF ratio (P = 0.02) (a measure of sympathovagal balance) in GHD patients when compared with controls. HRV results in patients who have been on long-term GH replacement were indistinguishable from controls. After 3 months GH replacement in the untreated GHD patient group, nVLF power had increased by 28% (P = 0.03) at 3 months and this was sustained at 6 months. However, no significant changes in LF and HF power were seen. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that abnormalities of the cardiac autonomic system in GHD patients may be correctable. Longer duration of prospective follow-up will be required to determine at what time point improvements in the other frequency bands occur.     

Treatment of growth hormone deficiency in adults

In analogy with other hormonal replacement therapy GH treatment should be commenced with a low starting dose, independent of body weight or body surface area. Hormonal replacement should mimic the normal physiology to minimize the risk of side effects in the life-long replacement of adults. We should, therefore, consider individual responsiveness and also be aware of the difference between pattern of GH under normal condition and during s.c. administration. The safety and monitoring of GH replacement therapy in adults have been addressed in the Growth Hormone Research Society Consensus Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with GH Deficiency from the Port Stephens Workshop, April 1997. Besides finding better and more accurate biochemical markers for choosing correct GH replacement dose, future research should address the long-term benefits and safety with GH replacement in adults, with special emphasize on incipient risks in terms of cardiovascular disease and of neoplasia, in particular.     

The utility of the growth hormone (GH) releasing hormone-arginine test for diagnosing GH deficiency in adults with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with cranial irradiation

CONTEXT: The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the current standard diagnostic test for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD), but alternative tests, such as the GHRH-arginine test, have been proposed. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of the GHRH-arginine test using ITT as the gold standard in diagnosing GHD in a group of young adults treated with cranial irradiation (CRT) for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We estimated the positive and negative predictive values of the GHRH-arginine test among patients as well as a number of individual characteristics and therapy-related factors during both the GHRH-arginine test and ITT. DESIGN: Forty-three young adults, treated for childhood ALL with 18-30 Gy CRT and chemotherapy, were studied, and comparison was made with matched controls. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated four different cutoff levels for GHD in the GHRH-arginine test: 5, 7.5, 9, and 16.5 microg/liter. Using 7.5 microg/liter as the cutoff yielded high specificity (94%), but at the same time the sensitivity was only 66%, which leads to a low negative predictive value (27%). In contrast, a failed GH response to the GHRH-arginine test accurately reflects the presence of radiation-induced GHD, illustrated by a high positive predictive value (95% at 7.5 microg/liter). Only age at CRT and body mass index remained significant predictors of the peak GH during the GHRH-arginine test. Because a high proportion of GHD patients show a normal response to the GHRH-arginine test, it cannot be used reliably to exclude GHD in these patients. Complementary ITT is also warranted to confirm GHD in obese patients.     

Endothelial dysfunction in hypopituitary adults with growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVES: Adult hypopituitarism with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) results in reduced exercise capacity, detrimental changes in body composition and lipid profiles and may be associated with an excess cardiovascular mortality. Endothelial dysfunction is an early event in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and predisposes to the deposition of unstable atherosclerotic plaques. We have used a noninvasive method to assess endothelial function in the brachial arteries of a group of treated hypopituitary adults with GHD, and a group of healthy age- and sex-matched controls. PATIENTS: Seventeen hypopituitary adults with GHD (13 male, 4 female) aged 26-54 years were studied. Each patient was receiving standard replacement therapy for all other hormonal deficiencies such that all target hormones were maintained in the normal reference range. All observations obtained were compared with those made in age- and sex-matched control subjects. All study subjects had no identifiable risk factors for endothelial dysfunction. MEASUREMENTS: Using an ultrasound vessel wall tracking system, the diameter of the left brachial artery was measured at rest, in response to reactive hyperaemia (endothelium-dependent dilation) and following sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) (endothelium-independent vasodilatation). We also measured fasting lipids, insulin, plasma glucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and IGF-1, and studied the relationship of these parameters to endothelial function. RESULTS: Flow mediated endothelium-dependent dilatation (FMD), expressed as a percentage change from resting base-line diameter, was significantly impaired in the GHD group (3.70 +/- 2.36% vs. 7.30 +/- 2.42%, P < 0.001). In contrast, GTN-mediated dilatation was similar in both groups. There were no differences in total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol or plasma triglyceride between the groups. Both fasting insulin (27.1 +/- 18.1 vs. 15.89 +/- 6.65 mU/l, P < 0.05) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (5.29 +/- 0.43 vs. 4.91 +/- 0.43%, P < 0.05) were significantly higher in the GHD group. FMD in both groups showed an inverse relationship with total cholesterol (r = -0.58, P < 0.05, GHD and r = -0.55, P < 0.05 controls). However, in the GHD subjects, there was a strong inverse relationship between FMD and LDL-cholesterol (r = -0.81, P < 0.0001). No other relationships were noted between FMD and any other metabolic parameters, or characteristics of GHD. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial dysfunction is present in GH deficient adults prior to the onset of overt atherosclerotic disease. The similar glucose yet elevated fasting insulin levels imply a state of relative insulin insensitivity. The strong inverse correlation between endothelial dysfunction and LDL-cholesterol suggests a possible aetiological role for LDL-cholesterol in the pathogenesis of any excess cardiovascular risk associated with adult hypopituitarism.