经十二指肠镜括约肌切开胆总管结石的处理(附168例报告)

目的：采用各种方法处理不同大小的胆总管结石。方法：于1986年3月至1996年9月经内镜括约肌切开（EST）治疗胆总管结石168例，其中单颗结石63例，2颗结石56例，3颗以上结石49例，最多一例8颗结石，结石的直径为5～25mm不等。结果：165例（98．2％）切开成功，3例失败。161例（95．8％）结石排出，其中96例（59．6％）结石自然排入肠道，57例（35．4％）采用网篮或气囊取出结石，6例（3．7％）采用碎石网篮碎石后排出，2例（1．2％）经震波碎石后排出。术后出现胃肠道出血1例（0．6％），胰腺炎1例（0．6％），胆管炎3例（1．8％）。48例术后行胃肠钡餐检查，43例胆道内无钡剂返流，2例胆道内有积气，3例有钡剂返流入胆道，但无临床症状。结论：EST是目前治疗胆管结石的重要手段之一。     

Results of endoscopic sphincterotomy in common bile duct lithiasis

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) was attempted in 409 patients with common bile duct stone(s) (CBDS). The mean age of patients was 72.0 +/- 0.8 years (m +/- SEM); 47 p. 100 presented risk factors; 57 p.100 had previously been cholecystectomized while 43 p. 100 had not. On an average, patients in the former group were older (80 +/- 0.7 years) than in the latter 65.4 +/- 1.0 years, p less than 0.001). The procedure was successful in 98 p. 100 of the patients, after a standard ES in 78.5 p. 100 or after different technical artifices in 21.5 p. 100. The vacuity of the CBD was obtained in 96.5 p. 100 of the cases. During the first month after the ES, 13 p. 100 of the patients had complications and 4 p. 100 died; 37 complications (9 p. 100) were related to the ES and were responsible for death in 4 patients: 18 episodes of bleeding at the site of ES, 7 acute pancreatitis, 6 cholangitis, 4 retroperitoneal perforations and 2 other complications. The occurrence of these complications was closely related to the technique of ES being more frequent after technical artifices than after a standard ES (p less than 0.001). On the other hand, these complications occurred independently of the age of patients or of previous cholecystectomy. Seventeen complications (4 p. 100) did not depend directly on ES and were responsible for death in 14 patients (3 p. 100): pneumopathy, pulmonary embolism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Variations of common bile duct diameter after endoscopic sphincterotomy

Diameters of the common bile duct (CBD) and common hepatic duct (CHD) were measured before and after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EPT) in 100 patients. There was a significant reduction of the lumen diameter in both the CBD and CHD (p less than 0.01) after EPT. A comparison between 32 patients without symptoms (such as pain, residual stones, and elevated levels of liver enzymes) and 19 patients with remaining symptoms after EPT, showed a statistically significant reduction in both CBD and CHD diameters (p less than 0.001) in the former group, and no statistically proven changes in the diameters in the latter group, since a change of less than 1.5 mm was not considered significant. Therefore, the absence of a reduction or a dilatation of the diameter of the CBD after EPT may suggest that these patients may have persisting complaints after EPT. Measurements on models (phantoms) show that body position of the patient during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has little and negligible influence on the measured diameters of the CBD and CHD.     

Early postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for retained common bile duct stones

Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed within 28 days after cholecystectomy in 20 patients with retained common bile duct stones, of whom 15 (75%) underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy within the first week of surgery. Stone extraction was successful in all patients and no immediate complications were noted. Early endoscopic sphincterotomy for retained common bile duct stones was safe and effective in the early postoperative period.     

Long-term follow-up of common bile duct diameter after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with common bile duct stones

Background and Aims  

To determine the time to normalization of common bile duct (CBD) diameter after endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction in patients with choledocholithiasis.     

Current management of the gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones

Background: Traditionally, a cholecystectomy is performed after successful endoscopic sphincterotomy and removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones, except in patients of advanced age or with substantial comorbidity. In practice, however, the gallbladder is left in situ more frequently now in patients without contraindications for surgery. The criteria by which patients are selected for an elective cholecystectomy are unclear. The aim of the present study was to establish the proportion of patients for whom a “wait-and-see” strategy was advised and to determine which, if any, patient characteristics had influenced this decision. Methods: This study included 71 patients, all younger than 80 years of age, with both CBD stones and a gallbladder containing stones in whom endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones was achieved. Results: Three patients underwent a cholecystectomy within 1 week because of acute cholecystitis. Among the remaining 68 patients, cholecystectomy was recommended for 42 patients and a wait-and-see strategy was advised for 26 patients. Patient characteristics were identical in both groups except for the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) score. The ASA score was higher in the wait-and-see group, but 69% of the patients in this group had an ASA score of I or II. Six patients in the wait-and-see group had symptoms; five patients underwent cholecystectomy. The outcome of surgery was no worse in this group than in the cholecystectomy group. Conclusions: Selection of patients for either elective cholecystectomy or wait-and-see was not based on established criteria but mainly dependent on preference of the specialist. The outcome of surgery, indicated in 23% of the patients in the wait-and-see group was comparable with elective cholecystectomy. A controlled trial comparing both treatment options in patients younger than 80 years of age should be performed. (Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:514-9.)     

Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy vs open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND Endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) for the management of common bile duct stones(CBDS) is used increasingly widely because it is a minimally invasive procedure. However, some clinical practitioners argued that EST may be complicated by post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)pancreatitis(PEP) and accompanied by a higher recurrence of CBDS than open choledochotomy(OCT). Whether any differences in outcomes exist between these two approaches for treating CBDS has not been thoroughly elucidated to date.AIM To compare the outcomes of EST vs OCT for the management of CBDS and to clarify the risk factors associated with stone recurrence.METHODS Patients who underwent EST or OCT for CBDS between January 2010 and December 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Follow-up data were obtained through telephone or by searching the medical records. Statistical analysis was carried out for 302 patients who had a follow-up period of at least 5 years or had a recurrence. Propensity score matching(1:1) was performed to adjust for clinical differences. A logistic regression model was used to identify potential risk factors for recurrence, and a receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was generated for qualifying independent risk factors.RESULTS In total, 302 patients undergoing successful EST(n = 168) or OCT(n = 134) were enrolled in the study and were followed for a median of 6.3 years. After propensity score matching, 176 patients remained, and all covariates were balanced. EST was associated with significantly shorter time to relieving biliary obstruction, anesthetic duration, procedure time, and hospital stay than OCT(P <0.001). The number of complete stone clearance sessions increased significantly in the EST group(P = 0.009). The overall incidence of complications and mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups. Recurrent CBDS occurred in18.8%(33/176) of the patients overall, but no difference was found between the EST(20.5%, 18/88) and OCT(17.0%, 15/88) groups. Factors associated with CBDS recurrence included common bile duct(CBD) diameter > 15 mm(OR =2.72; 95%CI: 1.26-5.87; P = 0.011), multiple CBDS(OR = 5.09; 95%CI: 2.58-10.07; P< 0.001), and distal CBD angle ≤ 145°(OR = 2.92; 95%CI: 1.54-5.55; P = 0.001). The prediction model incorporating these factors demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81(95%CI: 0.76-0.87).CONCLUSION EST is superior to OCT with regard to time to biliary obstruction relief, anesthetic duration, procedure time, and hospital stay and is not associated with an increased recurrence rate or mortality compared with OCT in the management of CBDS.     

内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合气囊扩张术在胆总管结石治疗中的应用价值

目的探讨内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合气囊扩张术在胆总管结石治疗中的效果和安全性。方法选取胆总管结石患者46例行乳头括约肌小切开联合气囊扩张术取石,观察治愈率,近期、远期并发症。结果取石成功率为95.7%;近期并发症发生率为6.5%,其中急性胰腺炎1例,胆管炎2例,远期并发症发生率为4.4%,反流性胆管炎、结石复发各1例。结论内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合气囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石,与乳头括约肌切开取石术同样有效,且安全性更好,操作更简单。     

Management of choledocholithiasis： Comparison between laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy

AIM：Choledocholithiasis is present in 5 to 10 percent of patients who have cholelithiasis. In the area of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOES) have been used to treatcholedo cholithiasis. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and hospital costs of LCBDE with IOES. METHODS: Between November 1999 and October 2002, patients with choledocholithiasis undergoing LC plus LCBDE (Group A, n=45) were retrospectively compared to those undergoing LC plus IOES (Group B, n=57) at a single institution. RESULTS: Ductal stone clearance rates were equivalent for the two groups (88% versus 89%, P=0.436). The conversion rate was higher for Group B (8.8% versus 4.4%,P=0.381), as was the morbidity (12.3% versus 6.7%, P=0.336). There were no other significant differences between the two groups. The complications were mainly related to endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), and the hospital costs were significantly increased in this subset of Group B (median, 23 910 versus 14 955 RMB yuan, P=0.03). Although hospital stay was longer in Group A (median, 7 versus 6 days, P=0.041), the patients in Group A had a significantly decreased cost of hospitalization compared with those in Group B (median, 11 362 versus 15 466 RMB yuan, P=0.000). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate equivalent ductal stone dearance rates for the two groups. LCBDE management appears safer, and is associated with a significantly decreased hospital cost. The findings suggest LCBDE for choledocholithiasis is a better option.     

Comparison between endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones

Background This study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic outcome and early postoperative complications, especially pancreatitis, of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in patients with common bile duct stones in our department. Methods One hundred eighty patients with common bile duct stones were randomized to undergo EPBD or EST. An 8-mm dilatation balloon was used for EPBD. Modified Cotton's criteria, in which relatively mild pancreatitis is also included as a complication, were used to determine the incidence of postoperative complications. Results The rate of complete removal of stones was significantly higher in the EST group (95.6%) than in the EPBD group (86.6%); for stones less than 10 mm in diameter, however, the rate with EPBD (93.8%) was almost equivalent to that with EST (98.1%). According to modified Cotton's criteria, the incidence of postoperative pancreatitis was significantly higher in the EPBD group (16.7%) than in the EST group (6.7%). Bleeding was encountered in one patient (1.1%) in the EST group, but in none in the EPBD group. No fatal complication occurred in either the EPBD or the EST group. Conclusions Although EPBD appears to be comparable to EST for removal of small common bile duct stones, mild postoperative pancreatitis is more likely to occur with EPBD than with EST.     

Composition of common bile duct stones in Chinese patients during and after endoscopic sphincterotomy

AIM: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is a well-established therapeutic modality for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones. After ES there are still around 10% of patients that experience recurrent CBD stones. The aim of this study is to investigate the composition of CBD stones before and after ES and its clinical significance in Chinese patients. METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2003, 735 patients with CBD stones received ES at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital and stone specimens from 266 patients were sent for analysis. Seventy-five patients had recurrent CBD stones and stone specimens from 44 patients were sent for analysis. The composition of the stones was analyzed by infrared (IR) spectrometry and they were classified as cholesterol or bilirubinate stones according to the predominant composition. Clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: In the initial 266 stone samples, 217 (82%) were bilirubinate stones, 42 (16%) were cholesterol stones, 3 were calcium carbonate stones, 4 were mixed cholesterol and bilirubinate stones. Patients with bilirubinate stones were significantly older than patients with cholesterol stones (66±13 years vs56±17 years, P= 0.001). In the 44 recurrent stone samples, 38 (86%) were bilirubinate stones, 3 (7%) were cholesterol stones, and 3 were mixed cholesterol and bilirubinate stones. In 27 patients, both initial and recurrent stone specimens can be obtained, 23 patients had bilirubinate stones initially and 2 became cholesterol stones in the recurrent attack. In the four patients with initial cholesterol stones, three patients had bilirubinate stones and one patient had a cholesterol stone in the recurrent attack. CONCLUSION: Bilirubinate stone is the predominant composition of initial or recurrent CBD stone in Chinese patients. The composition of CBD stones may be different from initial stones after ES.     

内镜下乳头球囊扩张术和乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的比较

目的 探讨内镜下乳头球囊扩张术(EPBD)治疗胆总管结石的有效性和安全性.方法 2005年6月至2007年5月山东大学齐鲁医院320例拟行内镜下取石的胆总管结石患者,随机分为EPBD组及内镜下乳头括约肌切开术(EST)组,每组160例.EPBD组在乳头球囊扩张后用取石网篮或气囊取石,当结石较大时先行机械碎石网篮碎石后再取石;EST组按常规操作.两组术后均常规鼻胆管引流3 d,并造影复查.结果 EST组及EPBD组分别有156例(97.5%)及157例(98.1%)成功取净结石,其中各有112例(70.0%)及104例(65.0%)一次完成;机械碎石网篮应用比例分别为20.0%(32/160)和22.5%(36/160);术后早期并发症的总发生率分别为5.6%及8.1%,无死亡病例.随访3年,EST组胆管结石复发率(7.5%)高于EPBD组(2.5%),P＜0.05.结论 EPBD取石具有与EST取石相近的成功率,经术后常规鼻胆管引流处理后,胰腺炎发生率无明显升高.EPBD可以作为胆总管结石的备选治疗措施,尤其是对不适于EST的患者.

Abstract：

Objective To explore the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation( EPBD ) for the removal of common bile duct stones. Methods Three hundred and twenty consecutive patients with common bile duct stones on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) who met all eligibility criteria were randomly assigned endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or EPBD.Complications were classified by an expert panel unaware of treatment allocation and outcome. Results After a single ERCP, all stones were removed from 112 patients ( 70% ) assigned EST and 104 ( 65% )assigned EPBD. Mechanical lithotripsy was used to fragment stones in 36 (22. 5% ) EPBD procedures and 32 ( 20. 0% ) EST procedures. Early complications occurred in 5.6% EST patients and 8.1% EPBD patients. No patient died. Gallstone disease recurrence, which is a long-term complication, is 7. 5% ( 12/160) in EST patients and 2.5% (4/160) in EPBD patients, P ＜0. 05. Conclusions The success rate of EPBD was similar to that of EST. We found no evidence of previously suggested higher risk of pancreatitis with EPBD, and suggest that EPBD is preferred in patients who are not suitable for EST, such as those with high risk of bleeding. This procedure is a valuable alternative to EST in patients with bile duct stones.     

内镜下十二指肠乳头小切开后球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的临床研究

目的探讨内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌小切开后球囊扩张术在胆总管结石治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法将150例临床确诊为胆总管结石的患者随机分为乳头括约肌切开组(EST组)和乳头括约肌小切开后球囊扩张术组(SEST+EPBD组),比较两组疗效及并发症的发生率。结果 EST组和SEST+EPBD组取石成功率分别为92%和97%(χ2=1.19,P0.05)。EST组术后出现急性胰腺炎2例,出血4例,结石复发11例,逆行性胆道感染15例。SEST+EPBD组术后出现急性胰腺炎1例,出血1例,结石复发2例,逆行性胆道感染6例。两组取石成功率及近期并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),远期并发症比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论内镜下乳头括约肌小切开后球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石安全、有效,并发症少,并且尽可能的保留了十二指肠乳头括约肌的功能,值得临床推广。