Perigastric lymph node status can be a simple prognostic parameter in patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The number of metastatic lymph nodes has been a significant prognostic factor after curative resection of gastric cancer and adopted as a new UICC classification of nodal stages in gastric cancer. The extent of lymphadenectomy is another significant factor but has been fiercely debated. Regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy, perigastric lymph node dissection is always carried out. In this study, we examined whether the number of metastatic perigastric nodes can be a prognostic indicator of gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: For the purpose of evaluating perigastric lymph node status, a retrospective study was carried out with 760 patients who underwent curative gastric resection from June 1994 to November 1998. RESULTS: The 4-year cumulative survival rate was 64% and the survival rate decreased significantly when the number of positive perigastric nodes exceeded 3. Comparing with the patients having 0-2 positive perigastric nodes, patients whose metastatic perigastric lymph nodes exceeded 3 or more exhibited deeper tumor invasion, larger tumor size and older age. Multivariate analysis identified the number of positive perigastric nodes, together with depth of tumor invasion, as the strongest independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the number of metastatic perigastric nodes can be used as a simple prognostic parameter in patients with gastric cancer and that intensive follow-up and adjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended for the patients with more than 3 metastatic perigastric nodes.     

Correlation of tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes with prognosis of patients with surgically-removed gastric carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes as prognostic factors of gastric carcinoma in surgically-treated patients. METHODS: The postoperative survival of 169 patients with gastric cancer who were performed D2 curative gastrectomy was analyzed with regard to its lymph node metastasis ratio and number. Meanwhile correlation of tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes with pathological parameters of these patients was studied. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate of all the patients studied was 29.6%. The 5-year cumulative survival rate in patients with 1%-20% and more than 20% of tumor-positive lymph nodes was 70.6% and 12.0% respectively, and 46.6% and 17.4% in those with 1-5 and more than 5 of tumor-positive lymph nodes respectively, which were significantly decreased with the increment of involved lymph nodes assessed by either numbers or ratio (P<0.05). Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that both the positive ratio and number of tumor-involved lymph nodes were sensitive prognostic factors in these surgically-treated patients, which were also significantly correlated with tumor size and depth of submucosal invasion (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes are associated with cancer progression and five-year survival rate, and may serve as valuable prognostic factors of gastric cancer in surgically-treated patients.     

Prognosis of gastric cancer patients with node-negative metastasis following curative resection: outcomes of the survival and recurrence

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to provide valuable prognostic information on lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients following curative resection. METHODS: Data from 112 lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection were reviewed to identify the independent factors of overall survival and recurrence. RESULTS: The five-year survival rate of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was 85.7%, and recurrence was identified in 25 patients after curative surgery. The five-year survival rate of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was higher than that of lymph node-positive gastric cancer patients (P<0.001). Recurrence in lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was less than that of lymph node-positive gastric cancer patients (P=0.001). The median survival after recurrence of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was longer than that of lymph node-positive gastric cancer patients (P=0.021). Using multivariate analyses, the following results were determined for lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients: sex, operative type and the presence of serosal involvement were independent factors of overall survival; and lymphadenectomy, number of dissected nodes and the presence of serosal involvement were independent factors of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients was better than that of lymph node-positive gastric cancer patients. Male sex, subtotal gastrectomy and nonserosal involvement should be considered to be the favourable predictors of postoperative long-term survival of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients. Conversely, limited lymphadenectomy, few dissected nodes and serosal involvement should be considered to be risk factors of postoperative recurrence of lymph node-negative gastric cancer patients.     

Multivariate prognostic study on node-positive gastric cancer: is tumor size a prognostic indicator?

Background/Aims: We analyzed the clinicopathological factors of patients with node-positive gastric cancer, evaluated the prognostic factors associated with long-term survival and clarified the effect of tumor size on long-term survival. Methodology: The study included 591 patients who underwent curative resection for node-positive gastric cancer. Clinicopathological prognostic variables were evaluated as predictors of long-term survival by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The 5-year survival rate was influenced by tumor size, tumor location, depth on invasion, level of lymph node metastasis, Borrmann classification, histological type, liver metastasis, peritoneal dissemination and disease stage. Of these, independent prognostic factors were depth on invasion and lymph node metastasis. Tumor size is an influence but not independent factor for the prediction of long-term survival in patients with node-positive gastric cancer. Conclusions: In patients with node-positive gastric cancer, two independent prognostic factors were depth on invasion and the status of lymph node metastasis.     

Does extended lymphadenectomy influence prognosis of gastric carcinoma after curative resection?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is unclear whether gastric cancer prognosis is improved by extended lymph node dissection more than by lymph node dissection limited to the contiguous N1 perigastric lymph nodes. METHODOLOGY: Four hundred and thirty-eight patients treated by curative gastrectomy were evaluated. Outcomes of D1/D1.5 lymphadenectomy, limited lymph node dissection and of D2/D2.5 lymphadenectomy, extended lymph node dissection and histopathological prognostic factors as in the 1993 TNM staging classification supplement were analyzed. RESULTS: Estimated overall 5-year survival was 54.9%. Five-year survival was 58.4% in the limited lymph node dissection group and 54% in the extended lymph node dissection (P n.s.). Stage I 5-year survival was 59% after D2.5 lymph node dissection, 58% after D1.5 and 50% after D2 dissection (P n.s.). Stage II 5-year survival was 86% in D2.5 group and 56% in D1.5 group (P = 0.041). Stage IIIa survival was 61% in the D2.5 group and 22% in the D1.5 group (P = 0.001). Stage IIIb 5-year survival was 42% after D2.5 resection and 0% in D1.5 group (P = 0.001). In the pT3 group 5-year survival was 72% after D2.5 dissection and 33% after D2 dissection (P = 0.001). In the positive N1 lymph nodes group 5-year survival was better after extended lymph node dissection than after limited lymph node dissection. In pN2a patients 5-year survival was 57% after D2.5 resection and 0% after D2 resection (P < 0.001). In pN2b and pN2c patients extended lymph node dissection did not statistically improve survival. CONCLUSIONS: Even if no statistical differences were found in overall survival, prognosis was improved by extended lymph node dissection in stage II and III, particularly in T2 and T3 subgroups and in N1 and N2a subgroups. When large numbers of positive nodes were found, improved survival was dependent upon resection of extragastric nodes distal to the uppermost echelon of positive nodes.     

Lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in gastric cancer: a multiple logistic regression analysis

BACKGROUND: In Japan, the standard treatment policy for all potentially curable patients with gastric cancer is radical resection including extensive lymphadenectomy. This treatment strategy has been used for both early and advanced gastric cancers, and substantial increases in survival time have been reported. In advanced gastric cancer, lymphatic spread is reported to be one of the most relevant prognostic factors for gastric cancer resected for cure. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting lymph node involvement and to establish guidelines for the extent of lymph node dissection most appropriate for the treatment of gastric cancer. METHODS: The clinicopathological features of 926 patients with gastric cancer were reviewed. Information on the clinicopathological features was obtained from the database of gastric cancer at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai National Hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses of data for patients with gastric cancer tumors were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinicopathological features. The independent risk factors influencing lymph node metastasis were determined by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The following clinicopathologic factors were found to be correlated with prognosis of gastric cancer: (1) macroscopic type, (2) depth of invasion, (3) cancer-stromal relationship, (4) histological growth pattern, (5) lymph node involvement, (6) lymphatic invasion, (7) vascular invasion and (8) tumor site. However, a multivariate analysis revealed that macroscopic type, depth of invasion, lymph node involvement and tumor site are independent risk factors for the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Among these factors, the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer was most strongly influenced by lymph node involvement (odds ratio, 4.632). According to a multiple logistic regression model, depth of cancer invasion and lymphatic invasion was significantly correlated with lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node involvement has the strongest influence on the prognosis of gastric cancer. Among the clinicopathological factors, depth of invasion and microscopically lymphatic invasion are important factors in predicting lymph node metastases. Thus, the ability to perform gastrectomy with dissection of lymph nodes is a basic requirement for gastric cancer surgeons.     

Prognostic Indicators for Survival After Curative Resection for Patients with Carcinoma of the Stomach

This study aims to determine prognosticindicators among patient-, tumor-, and treatmentrelatedfactors of gastric cancer patients. A total of 510patients who underwent curative gastric resection were studied. Univariate analysis of patient-relatedfactors showed a significantly lower survival inpatients with a history of obstruction, hypoalbuminemia,and anemia. Tumor-related factors including gross appearance, location, and size of tumor; depthof cancer invasion; level, number, and frequency oflymph node metastasis; stromal reaction and tumor growthpattern; and histological classification allsignificantly affected survival. Surgical treatment relatedfactors such as total or distal subtotal gastrectomy,extent of lymphadenectomy, and combined resection ofadjacent organ(s) showed a statistically significant adverse influence on survival. Multivariateanalysis identified only four tumor-related factors— number of metastatic lymph nodes, depth ofcancer invasion, stromal reaction, and gross appearanceof the tumor — as independently affectingsurvival. These findings suggest that only fourtumor-related factors were prognostic indicators inpatients with gastric cancer.     

Association of the number of metastatic perigastric lymph nodes with long-term survival in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The presence of metastases in lymph nodes is an important prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Currently, the total number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLN) is thought to be more prognostically significant than the anatomical distribution of MLN. METHODOLOGY: The associations of the total number of MLN and of the number of perigastric (PG) MLN with long-term survival were retrospectively evaluated using uni- and multivariate analysis in 481 nodepositive gastric cancer patients who underwent potentially curative resections. RESULTS: The number of PG MLN was a better prognostic indicator than the total number of MLN (indices of correlation 0.2908 and 0.3424, respectively). Good surgical results were obtained in patients with 5 PG MLN or fewer. CONCLUSIONS: The number of perigastric metastatic lymph nodes is a more conveniently obtained and reliable prognostic factor than the total number of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with node-positive gastric cancer.     

Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer,one of the most common malignancies in the world,frequently reveals lymph node,peritoneum,and liver metastases.Most of gastric cancer patients present with lymph node metastasis when they were initially diagnosed or underwent surgical resection,which results in poor prognosis.Both the depth of tumor invasion and lymph node involvement are considered as the most important prognostic predictors of gastric cancer.Although extended lymphadenectomy was not considered a survival benefit procedure and was reported to be associated with high mortality and morbidity in two randomized controlled European trials,it showed significant superiority in terms of lower locoregional recurrence and disease related deaths compared to limited lymphadenectomy in a 15-year followup study.Almost all clinical investigators have reached a consensus that the predictive efficiency of the number of metastatic lymph nodes is far better than the extent of lymph node metastasis for the prognosis of gastric cancer worldwide,but other nodal metastatic classifications of gastric cancer have been proposed as alternatives to the number of metastatic lymph nodes for improving the predictive efficiency for patient prognosis.It is still controversial over whether the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is superior to the number of metastatic lymph nodes in prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer.Besides,the negative lymph node count has been increasingly recognized to be an important factor significantly associated with prognosis of gastric cancer.     

Evaluation of D3/D4 lymph node dissection for patients with grossly N2 positive advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Extended lymphadenectomy (D2) with complete resection of gastric cancer has been generally accepted as a standard treatment modality in Japan. However, the clinical evaluation of the superextended lymphadenectomy (D3/D4) for advanced type of gastric cancer has not been established. METHODOLOGY: Eight hundred and twenty primary gastric cancer patients underwent gastric resection in our institute (1987-1997). Of those patients, 436 patients with more than t2 depth of cancer invasion underwent curative gastrectomy either with D2 (337 cases) or D3/D4 (99 cases). D3/D4 was performed for the cases in which metastasis was recognized in N2 lymph nodes with gross inspection at the time of operation. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant survival advantage to the D3/D4 when comparing between the D2 and D3/D4 groups. However, the relative risk of death due to postoperative relapse in the D3/D4 showed a significantly lower hazard ratio than in the D2, in the Cox proportional-hazard model (0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.94). Patients receiving D3/D4 lymphadenectomy showed a better 5-year survival rate in stage IIIb than those with D2 (18.4% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.039). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups as regards postoperative morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: D3/D4 lymphadenectomy might be of therapeutic value for limited patients with advanced gastric cancer.     

Effects of extended lymphadenectomy and postoperative chemotherapy on node-negative gastric cancer

AIM:To investigate the effects of extended lymphadenectomy and postoperative chemotherapy on gastric cancer without lymph node metastasis.METHODS:Clinical data of 311 node-negative gastric cancer patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy with more than 15 lymph nodes resected,from January 2002 to December 2006,were analyzed retrospectively.Patients with pT4 stage or distant metastasis were excluded.We analyzed the relationship between the D2 lymphadenectomy and the 5-year survival rate among different subgroups stratified by clinical features,such as age,tumor size,tumor location and depth of invasion.At the same time,the relationship between postoperative chemotherapy and the5-year survival rate among different subgroups were also analyzed.RESULTS:The overall 5-year survival rate of the entire cohort was 63.7%.The 5-year survival rate was poor in those patients who were:(1)more than 65 years old;(2)with tumor size larger than 4 cm;(3)with tumor located in the upper portion of the stomach;and(4)with pT3 tumor.The survival rate was improved significantly by extended lymphadenectomy only in patients with pT3 tumor(P=0.019),but not in other subgroups.Moreover,there was no significant difference in survival rate between patients with and without postoperative chemotherapy among all of the subgroups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION:For gastric cancer patients without lymph node metastasis,extended lymphadenectomy could improve the survival rate of those who have pT3-stage tumor.However,there was no evidence of a survival benefit from postoperative chemotherapy alone.     

Recurrence in early gastric cancer--presence of micrometastasis in lymph node of node negative early gastric cancer patient with recurrence

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are cases of recurrence even after curative resection in early gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: Seven hundred and sixty-five patients with early gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy were analyzed to identify the prognostic factor. Micrometastases within lymph nodes were determined by immunohistochemistry using anti-cytokeratin antibody in node-negative early gastric cancer patients with recurrence. RESULTS: The recurrence was observed in 17 patients. Hematogenous recurrence was observed most frequently (47.1%), followed by peritoneal recurrence (23.5%). Of 17 patients with recurrence, 6 (35.3%) patients died more than 5 years after operation. The prognosis was poorer when the patients were older, and the depth of invasion was greater, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic involvement, and vascular involvement were present, and lymph node dissection was limited. The independent prognostic factors were lymph node metastasis, lymph node dissection, and age by multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards. Micrometastases within lymph nodes were confirmed in 3 of 6 node-negative patients with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: When patients have lymph node metastases or are older, close and long-term follow-up and careful planning of postoperative adjuvant therapy might be necessary to avoid recurrence. The detection of micrometastases by anti-cytokeratin antibody might be useful for predicting the possibility of recurrence in early gastric cancer.     

Indications of limited surgery for gastric cancer with submucosal invasion--analysis of 715 cases with special reference to site of the tumor and level 2 lymph nodes

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is controversy as to whether limited or extended lymph node dissection should be performed for gastric cancer with submucosal invasion. METHODOLOGY: To clarify the indications of limited surgery for gastric cancer invading the submucosa, we retrospectively examined the incidence of lymph node metastases with regard to the location of the tumor and distant lymph node station in 715 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer with submucosal invasion. We classified the level 2 lymph nodes into four groups as follows: group 1 was defined as perigastric lymph nodes far from the primary tumors, group 2 as nodes around the left gastric and the common hepatic arteries, group 3 as nodes around the celiac axis, and group 4 as nodes along the splenic artery. RESULTS: The occurrence of the metastases to level 1 nodes was 14.5% (104 of 715) and that to level 2 nodes was 4.5% (32 of 715). Among the latter, metastases to group 1 lymph nodes were detected in 6 only in the lower third (2.1%) and that to group 2 in 5 in the upper third (6.2%), 9 in the middle third (2.6%), and 12 in the lower third of the stomach (4.1%). Metastases to groups 3 and 4 were only recognized in 2 in the middle third of the stomach (0.3%). Tumors less than 8 mm did not metastasize to lymph nodes and those less than 12 mm did not metastasize to distant ones. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that in gastric cancer invading the submucosa, it would be sufficient to dissect group 2 lymph nodes for tumors located at the upper third or the middle third of the stomach, and for tumors located in the lower third of the stomach nodes of groups 1 and 2 should be dissected. For tumors less than 8 mm in the diameter partial resection alone could do and for those less than 12 mm D1 dissection is recommended.     

Preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasound.

The preoperative use of endoscopic ultrasound was evaluated in 74 patients with confirmed gastric cancer. It was used in diagnosing the depth of invasion in the gastric wall, the infiltration to the adjacent organs, and the involvement of the perigastric lymph nodes. Results were compared with histological findings in resected specimens. Accuracy in staging gastric cancer using the T grade of the 1987 TNM system was 81.1% (60 of 74 patients). Endoscopic ultrasound provided excellent results compared with computed tomography and conventional ultrasound, particularly in evaluating perigastric lymph node metastasis and direct infiltration to the adjacent organs. The success rate in detecting lymph node metastasis was 50% (11 of 22 patients); the accuracy in diagnosing direct infiltration to the adjacent organs was 60% (three of five patients). This technique is useful in diagnosing malignant invasion and lymph node metastasis of gastric carcinomas but requires further refinement for use in diagnosing the disease itself. Its preoperative use is recommended for establishing surgical and other treatment plans, as well as in predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer.     

Regional lymph node recurrence without intragastric lesions after curative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer meeting the absolute indications of endoscopic resection: A case report

Rationale:With the increase of gastric cancer surveillance and endoscopic resection techniques, the number of endoscopic resections being performed for the treatment of early gastric cancer in East Asian countries has been increasing. Previously, endoscopic resection has been limited to only differentiated type intramucosal cancers which had a diameter ≤2.0 cm, provided there was no evidence of ulceration and lymphovascular invasion, known as absolute indications. And recently, indications for endoscopic resection have been expanded to include even more cases.Patient concerns:A 57-year-old female, who had undergone curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer under the absolute indications for endoscopic resection 5 years prior, was referred to the department of general surgery with metastatic perigastric lymph nodes without intragastric lesions.Diagnosis:Computed tomography scan revealed the presence of a few enlarged lymph nodes at the distal part of the lesser curvature of the stomach. And positron emission tomography scan further revealed the presence of two hypermetabolic lymph nodes near the common hepatic artery, suggestive of metastatic lymph nodes.Interventions:Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy with D2 lymph node dissection were performed.Outcomes:Final pathology report revealed the absence of any residual carcinoma in the stomach. However lymphovascular invasion of omental fat, and 3 out of 29 perigastric lymph nodes harvested had metastatic adenocarcinoma.Lessons:The case demonstrates that regional lymph node recurrence without intragastric lesions after curative resection of early gastric cancer meeting the absolute indications for endoscopic resection is possible even 5 years after resection of the primary lesion.     

Postoperative mortality and morbidity after D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND Surgery for gastric cancer is a complex procedure and lymphadenectomy is often mandatory.Postoperative mortality and morbidity after curative gastric cancer surgery is not insignificant.AIM To evaluate the factors determining mortality and morbidity in a population of patients undergoing R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.METHODS A retrospective analysis of clinical data and pathological characteristics(age,sex,primary site of the tumor,Lauren histotype,number of positive lymph nodes resected,number of negative lymph nodes resected,and depth of invasion as defined by the standard nomenclature)was conducted in patients with gastric cancer.For each patient we calculated the Kattan’s score.We arbitrarily divided the study population of patients into two groups based on the nomogram score(<100 points or≥100 points).Prespecified subgroups in these analyses were defined according to age(≤65 years or>65 years),and number of lymph nodes retrieved(≤35 lymph nodes or>35 lymph nodes).Uni-and multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological findings were performed to identify the factors affecting postoperative mortality and morbidity.RESULTS One-hundred and eighty-six patients underwent a curative R0 resection with D2 lymphadenectomy.Perioperative mortality rate was 3.8%(7 patients);a higher mortality rate was observed in patients aged>65 years(P=0.002)and in N+patients(P=0.04).Following univariate analysis,mortality was related to a Kattan’s score≥100 points(P=0.04)and the presence of advanced gastric cancer(P=0.03).Morbidity rate was 21.0%(40 patients).Surgical complications were observed in 17 patients(9.1%).A higher incidence of morbidity was observed in patients where more than 35 lymph nodes were harvested(P=0.0005).CONCLUSION Mortality and morbidity rate are higher in N+and advanced gastric cancer patients.The removal of more than 35 lymph nodes does not lead to an increase in mortality.     

The prognosis of stage IV gastric carcinoma patients after curative resection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the UICC staging system, stage IV contains not only those patients with distant metastasis but also patients with far-advanced T and N status but without distant metastasis. We investigated the prognostic factors of stage IV gastric carcinoma patients, without distant metastasis after curative resection and the role of surgery. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and ninety stage IV gastric carcinoma patients, without distant metastasis were reviewed after curative resection in our hospital from January 1987 to December 1996. RESULTS: Male sex, distal third location, diffuse or infiltrative type and histologically undifferentiated type were common. Of the 190 patients, 52 (27.4%) patients lived more than 3 years. The lymph node ratio (positive lymph node/retrieved lymph node) and combined resection independently affected survival (P = 0.0013, 0.0061, respectively). The perigastric lymph node ratio was well correlated with overall lymph node ratio (r = 0.794, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With the involvement of an adjacent organ and knowing the perigastric lymph node ratio, the surgeon can decide upon the extent of dissection and postoperative treatment. However, a prospective study is warranted.     

Routine modified D2 lymphadenectomy performance in pT1-T2N0 gastric cancer

AIM: To evaluate routine modified D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer, based on immunohistochemically detected skip micrometastases in level Ⅱ lymph nodes.METHODS: Among 95 gastric cancer patients who were routinely submitted to curative modified D2 lymphadenectomy, from January 2004 to December 2008, 32 were classified as pN0. All level Ⅰ lymph nodes of these 32 patients were submitted to immunohistochemistry for micrometastases detection.Patients in whom micrometastases were detected in the level Ⅰ lymph node stations ( n = 4) were excluded from further analysis. The level Ⅱ lymph nodes of the remaining 28 patients were studied immunohistochemically for micrometastases detection and constitute the material of the present study.RESULTS: Skip micrometastases in the level Ⅱ lymph nodes were detected in 14% (4 out of 28) of the patients.The incidence was further increased to 17% (4 out of 24) in the subgroup of T12 gastric cancer patients. All micrometastases were detected in the No. 7 lymph node station. Thus, the disease was upstaged from stage ⅠA to ⅠB in one patient and from stage ⅠB to Ⅱ in three patients.CONCLUSION: In gastric cancer, true R0 resection may not be achieved without modified D2 lymphadenectomy.Until D2+/D3 lymphadenectomy becomes standard,modified D2 lymphadenectomy should be performed routinely.     

Clinical results and prognostic factors of radiologically node-positive gastric carcinoma

Lymph node metastasis determined by histologic examination is an important prognostic indicator in gastric carcinoma. However, prognostic value of lymph node metastasis detected by computed tomography (CT) is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical results and prognostic factors of patients with radiologically node-positive gastric carcinoma. The study included 78 patients with primary gastric carcinoma and lymph node metastasis confirmed by CT. The level of lymph node metastasis was simply graded as follows: level I included perigastric nodes; level II included intermediate nodes along the left gastric, common hepatic, and celiac arteries; and level III included distant nodes along the hepatoduodenal ligament, pancreas, spleen, and abdominal aorta. Sixty patients (79%) had stage IV tumors showing one or more of the following: level III lymph node metastasis in 37, pancreatic invasion in 27, peritoneal dissemination in 23, and liver metastasis in 19. Overall 1- and 5-year survival rates were 29% and 6%, respectively, and the 1-year survival rate was significantly influenced by the level of lymph node metastasis on CT (55% for level I, 27% for level II, 7% for level III, P < 0.01). In patients with gastrectomy, prognostic factors were tumor size (<10 cm versus >10 cm, P < 0.01), gross type (localized versus infiltrative, P < 0.01), histologic type (well differentiated versus poorly differentiated, P < 0.01), and curability of the disease (curative versus noncurative, P < 0.01). Our study indicates that prognosis of patients with radiologically node-positive gastric carcinoma is poor because of high frequency of extensive tumor spreads. Patients having only positive level I nodes on CT are candidates for curative gastrectomy, which may offer long-term survival.     

Prediction of survival period for patients with postoperative recurrence after curative resection for advanced gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although many studies have attempted to clarify the prognostic indicators for gastric carcinoma, there have been few studies regarding the factors that correlate with the survival period of patients with postoperative recurrence. METHODOLOGY: Among 504 advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy, 188 patients who had died of recurrence were used in this study. RESULTS: Univariate analysis indicated that age, the presence of lymph node metastasis and blood vessel invasion, the number of positive lymph nodes, and gastrectomy significantly correlated with the survival period. Multivariate analysis indicated that the length of the survival period was independently influenced by the number of positive lymph nodes and blood vessel invasion. The survival time of patients with less than 3 positive lymph nodes and no accompanying blood vessel invasion was significantly longer than that of other patients. CONCLUSIONS: The number of positive lymph nodes and the presence of blood vessel invasion are the most important factors predicting the survival period of patients with postoperative recurrence after curative resection for advanced gastric carcinoma.