Kinematics of partial and total ruptures of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow

In this study the kinematics of partial and total ruptures of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow are investigated. After selective transection of the medial collateral ligament of 8 osteoligamentous intact elbow preparations was performed, 3-dimensional measurements of angular displacement, increase in medial joint opening, and translation of the radial head were examined during application of relevant stress. Increase in joint opening was significant only after complete transection of the anterior part of the medial collateral ligament was performed. The joint opening was detected during valgus and internal rotatory stress only. After partial transection of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament was performed, there was an elbow laxity to valgus and internal rotatory force, which became significant after transection of 100% of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament and was maximum between 70 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion. No radial head movement was seen after partial or total transection of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament was performed. In conclusion, this study indicates that valgus or internal rotatory elbow instability should be evaluated at 70 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion. Detection of partial ruptures in the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament based on medial joint opening and increased valgus movement is impossible.     

Functional anatomy of the lateral collateral ligament complex of the elbow: configuration of Y and its role

A previous anatomic study has revealed that the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex of the elbow has a Y-shaped configuration, which consists of a superior, an anterior, and a posterior band. The LCL complex, including the annular ligament, functions as a 3-dimensional (3D) Y-shaped structure. On the basis of this concept, joint laxity after transection of the anterior band was studied in 5 normal, fresh-frozen cadaver elbows with a 3D kinematic testing apparatus. Cutting the anterior band produced significant laxity to varus torque with a mean 5.9 degree at 10 degree of elbow flexion and caused significant laxity to torque in external rotation with a mean 8.5 degree at 40 degree of flexion. No significant laxity was observed during application of valgus or internal rotational torque. Further transection of the posterior band resulted in gross instability with dislocation of the ulnohumeral joint. The laxity occurring after severance of the anterior band suggests that these fibers play a role in preservation of elbow stability against varus and external rotational torque. These results indicate that the LCL functions as a complex with a Y structure and not as an isolated linear ligament. A concept of conjoint point is hypothesized for the function of the LCL complex to restrain posterolateral rotatory instability.     

Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow

Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow is a three-dimensional displacement pattern of abnormal external rotatory subluxation of the ulna coupled with valgus displacement on the humeral trochlea. This pattern causes the forearm bones to displace into external rotation and valgus during flexion of the elbow. Injury to the lateral ulnar collateral ligament allows abnormal supination of the ulna on the humerus. The radial head, being locked in the sigmoid (radial) notch of the proximal ulna by the annular ligament, subluxates posterior to the capitellum. The abnormality is usually posttraumatic and presents with locking, snapping, clicking, catching, and recurrent dislocation of the elbow. The clinical diagnosis is suspected from history and confirmed by the physical examination, which includes the posterolateral rotatory instability test. This test often is best performed under fluoroscopy or general anesthesia. Usually the instability is managed with either a repair of the ligament or an isometric reconstruction using a tendon graft.     

Elbow instability

An understanding of elbow instability is predicated on knowledge of the anatomy of the lateral collateral ligament complex and of the mechanism and kinematics of elbow subluxation and dislocation. The lateral collateral ligament complex is the key structure involved in recurrent elbow instability and it is virtually always disrupted in elbow dislocations that result from a fall. The ulnar part of the lateral collateral ligament complex (also known as lateral ulnar collateral ligament) is the critical portion of the ligament complex securing the ulna to the humerus and preventing posterolateral rotatory instability. The kinematics of elbow subluxation and dislocation are a three dimensional coupled motion referred to as posterolateral rotatory instability in which the forearm rotates off the humerus in valgus/external rotation during flexion from the extended position. Elbow instability is diagnosed on clinical examination by the lateral pivot-shift test, the posterolateral rotatory apprehension and drawer tests and on radiographic examination by performing stress x-rays. While the lateral pivot-shift test is difficult to perform, the posterolateral rotatory drawer test is much less difficult. The most sensitive test, however, is the posterolateral rotatory apprehension test. A positive apprehension test in a patient presenting with a history of recurrent painful clicking, snapping, clucking, or locking of the elbow should lead one directly to the suspected diagnosis of posterolateral rotatory instability. Treatment is surgical, by repair or reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex, specifically the ulnar part. Deficiencies of the coronoid and/or radial head must be addressed.     

Elbow subluxation and dislocation. A spectrum of instability.

After sequential releases of the ligaments and capsules of 13 fresh autopsy specimen elbows, external rotation and valgus moments with axial forces resulted in posterior dislocations in 12 of the 13 with the anterior medical collateral ligament (AMCL) intact. Kinematic displacements measured with a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device showed that dislocation involved posterolateral rotation of 34 degrees-50 degrees and 5 degrees-23 degrees valgus at about 80 degrees flexion. Dislocation is the final of three sequential stages of elbow instability resulting from posterolateral rotation, with soft-tissue disruption progressing from lateral to medial. In each stage, the pathoanatomy correlated with the pattern and degree of instability. Testing for valgus stability of the elbow during simulated active flexion revealed no significant increase (-0.3 degrees-2.4 degrees) in valgus laxity after reduction compared with the intact specimens (p greater than 0.05, beta = 0.1, delta = 2.5 degrees). In no case did the digitized AMCL origin-to-insertion distance increase beyond normal during the dislocation (p less than 0.01). The mechanism of dislocation during a fall on the outstretched hand would involve the body "rotating internally" on the elbow, which experiences an external rotation/valgus moment as it flexes. Posterior dislocations should therefore be reduced in supination. If valgus stability in pronation is demonstrated, the AMCL can be assumed to be intact, and rehabilitation in a hinged cast-brace with the elbow in full pronation can be commenced immediately.     

Ligamentous reconstruction around the elbow using triceps tendon

Posttraumatic instability of the elbow joint can be osseous or ligamentous. Ligamentous instability can be in valgus or in posterolateral rotatory direction. Rupture of both the lateral and medial collateral ligament of the elbow can be seen as an isolated injury, or it can be part of a more complex injury such as a dislocation. Persistent insufficiency of the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow results in posterolateral rotatory instability. Insufficiency of the medial collateral ligament, the anterior part in particular, results in valgus instability. Persistent symptoms after nonoperative treatment are an indication for reconstruction. In the past, ligamentous reconstruction at both the lateral and medial side was performed using palmaris tendon graft through bony drill holes.In this article I describe a new technique using ipsilateral triceps tendon, fixed in drill holes using bioabsorbable interference screws. This technique allows simplified graft tensioning and improved graft fixation, and avoids the risk of fracturing of the bony tunnels. An accelerated rehabilitation protocol can be applied. The final result depends on proper isometric reconstruction, associated lesions or degeneration of the elbow joint and adequate after-treatment. Taking these factors into account, the technique described shows promising short-term results.     

Ligamentous reconstruction around the elbow using triceps tendon

Posttraumatic instability of the elbow joint can be osseous or ligamentous. Ligamentous instability can be in valgus or in posterolateral rotatory direction. Rupture of both the lateral and medial collateral ligament of the elbow can be seen as an isolated injury, or it can be part of a more complex injury such as a dislocation. Persistent insufficiency of the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow results in posterolateral rotatory instability. Insufficiency of the medial collateral ligament, the anterior part in particular, results in valgus instability. Persistent symptoms after nonoperative treatment are an indication for reconstruction. In the past, ligamentous reconstruction at both the lateral and medial side was performed using palmaris tendon graft through bony drill holes. In this article I describe a new technique using ipsilateral triceps tendon, fixed in drill holes using bioabsorbable interference screws. This technique allows simplified graft tensioning and improved graft fixation, and avoids the risk of fracturing of the bony tunnels. An accelerated rehabilitation protocol can be applied. The final result depends on proper isometric reconstruction, associated lesions or degeneration of the elbow joint and adequate after-treatment. Taking these factors into account, the technique described shows promising short-term results.     

Effects of elbow flexion and forearm rotation on valgus laxity of the elbow

BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation of valgus elbow laxity is difficult. The optimum position of elbow flexion and forearm rotation with which to identify valgus laxity in a patient with an injury of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow has not been determined. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of forearm rotation and elbow flexion on valgus elbow laxity. METHODS: Twelve intact cadaveric upper extremities were studied with a custom elbow-testing device. Laxity was measured with the forearm in pronation, supination, and neutral rotation at 30 degrees, 50 degrees, and 70 degrees of elbow flexion with use of 2 Nm of valgus torque. Testing was conducted with the ulnar collateral ligament intact, with the joint vented, after cutting of the anterior half (six specimens) or posterior half (six specimens) of the anterior oblique ligament of the ulnar collateral ligament, and after complete sectioning of the anterior oblique ligament. Laxity was measured in degrees of valgus angulation in different positions of elbow flexion and forearm rotation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in valgus laxity with respect to elbow flexion within each condition. Overall, for both groups of specimens (i.e., specimens in which the anterior or posterior half of the anterior oblique ligament was cut), neutral forearm rotation resulted in greater valgus laxity than pronation or supination did (p < 0.05). Transection of the anterior half of the anterior oblique ligament did not significantly increase valgus laxity; however, transection of the posterior half resulted in increased valgus laxity in some positions. Full transection of the anterior oblique ligament significantly increased valgus laxity in all positions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this in vitro cadaveric study demonstrated that forearm rotation had a significant effect on varus-valgus laxity. Laxity was always greatest in neutral forearm rotation throughout the ranges of elbow flexion and the various surgical conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The information obtained from the present study suggests that forearm rotation affects varus-valgus elbow laxity. Additional investigation is warranted to determine if forearm rotation should be considered in the evaluation and treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow joint.     

Posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow

Recurrent posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow is an apparently undescribed clinical condition that is difficult to diagnose. We treated five patients, ranging in age from five to forty years, who had such a lesion and in whom the instability could be demonstrated only by what we call the posterolateral rotatory-instability test. This test involves supination of the forearm and application of a valgus moment and an axial compression force to the elbow while it is flexed from full extension. The elbow is reduced in full extension and must be subluxated as it is flexed in order to obtain a positive test result (a sudden reduction of the subluxation). Flexion of more than about 40 degrees produces a sudden palpable and visible reduction of the radiohumeral joint. The elbow does not subluxate without provocation. The cause for this condition, we think, is laxity of the ulnar part of the lateral collateral ligament, which allows a transient rotatory subluxation of the ulnohumeral joint and a secondary dislocation of the radiohumeral joint. The annular ligament remains intact, so the radio-ulnar joint does not dislocate. Operative repair of the lax ulnar part of the lateral collateral ligament eliminated the posterolateral rotatory instability, as revealed intraoperatively in our five patients.     

Ligamentous stabilizers against posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: The lateral ulnar collateral ligament, the entire lateral collateral ligament complex, and the overlying extensor muscles have all been suggested as key stabilizers against posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether either an intact radial collateral ligament alone or an intact lateral ulnar collateral ligament alone is sufficient to prevent posterolateral rotatory instability when the annular ligament is intact. METHODS: Sequential sectioning of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments was performed in twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. At each stage of the sectioning protocol, a pivot shift test was performed with the arm in a vertical position. Passive elbow flexion was performed with the forearm maintained in either pronation or supination and the arm in the varus and valgus gravity-loaded orientations. An electromagnetic tracking device was used to quantify the internal-external rotation and varus-valgus angulation of the ulna with respect to the humerus. RESULTS: Compared with the intact elbow, no differences in the magnitude of internal-external rotation or maximum varus-valgus laxity of the ulna were detected with only the radial collateral or lateral ulnar collateral ligament intact (p > 0.05). However, once the entire lateral collateral ligament was transected, significant increases in internal-external rotation (p = 0.0007) and maximum varus-valgus laxity (p < 0.0001) were measured. None of the pivot shift tests had a clinically positive result until the entire lateral collateral ligament was sectioned. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, when the annular ligament is intact, either the radial collateral ligament or the lateral ulnar collateral ligament can be transected without inducing posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow.     

Experimental elbow instability after transection of the medial collateral ligament

In 12 osteoligamentous autopsy elbow preparations, the stability of the elbow was independent of the collateral ligament with flexion of less than 20 degrees and greater than 120 degrees. The anterior part of the collateral medial ligament was the prime stabilizer of the elbow in this range of motion, i.e., the flexion range of function. The maximum valgus and internal rotatory instability after transection of the medial collateral ligament, 20.2 degrees and 21.0 degrees, respectively, were found at elbow flexions from 60 degrees to 70 degrees. Selective repair or reconstruction of the anterior part of the elbow medial collateral ligament may prove to be effective in the treatment of acute or chronic elbow instability.     

The stability of the elbow following excision of the radial head and transection of the annular ligament. An experimental study

The stabilizing role of the lateral ligament complex and the radial head were investigated in ten osteoligamentous elbow preparations. The annular ligament was the prime stabilizer of the lateral aspect of the elbow. Transection of the annular ligament caused maximal varus and external rotatory instability of 13.7 degrees and 32.8 degrees respectively, with an elbow flexion about 70 degrees. Isolated excision of the radial head caused slight varus and external rotatory instability of 4.8 degrees and 10.4 degrees respectively, with an elbow flexion about 40 degrees. The lateral collateral ligament had only a minor stabilizing function of the elbow. The stability of the elbow after excision of the radial head may be improved by proper preservation of the annular ligament.     

Elbow joint instability: A kinematic model

The effect of simultaneous ulnar and radial collateral ligament division on the kinematics of the elbow joint is studied in a cadaveric model. Severance of the anterior part of the ulnar collateral ligament and the annular ligament led to significant elbow joint instability in valgus and varus stress and in forced external and internal rotation. The mean maximum laxity in valgus stress and forced external rotation were 5.7° and 13.2°. The forearms of the elbow joint specimens were transfixed in maximum pronation. During valgus and varus stress the corresponding spontaneous ulnar rotation of the specimens was recorded. The reproducibility of the instability pattern suggests that this model is suitable for evaluating stabilizing procedures aimed at correction of elbow joint instability before these procedures are introduced into patient care.     

Effectiveness of the lateral unilateral dynamic external fixator after elbow ligament injury

BACKGROUND: The optimum management of ligamentous injuries of the elbow is not known. Use of dynamic external fixators has been advocated to stabilize the joint while maintaining motion, but there are no published data to corroborate their efficacy. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a laterally applied unilateral dynamic external fixator is capable of stabilizing and restoring normal kinematics to elbows with varying degrees of soft-tissue injury. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities, from donors who were an average of seventy-six years of age at the time of death, were tested in a custom apparatus with an electromagnetic tracking device to analyze the kinematic behavior. Testing began with an injury of either the lateral or the medial collateral ligament, which was followed by a second test with an injury to the ligament on the contralateral side of the joint. In each test, the varus-valgus displacement and the forearm rotatory displacement were measured through the arc of elbow flexion under three loading conditions (hand weight alone, hand weight plus 3.5 N, and hand weight plus 7 N). After each test (with each injury), a unilateral external fixator was applied from the lateral aspect of the elbow, and the same measurements were conducted under the three loading conditions across the elbow joint. RESULTS: With varus stress testing, both after injury of the medial collateral ligament alone and after injury of the lateral collateral ligament and extensor mass alone, the laterally applied unilateral dynamic external fixator was capable of maintaining the displacements within the laxity envelope of an uninjured elbow. With valgus stress testing, after either lateral or medial ligamentous injury, the fixator was unable to maintain displacements within the normal laxity envelope when a 7-N load was applied to the elbow. When both medial and lateral injuries were present, the lateral fixator maintained varus displacement within normal limits, but valgus displacement was consistently maintained within normal limits only when no additional load was applied to the forearm. CONCLUSIONS: A lateral dynamic elbow external fixator is capable of maintaining varus displacements within normal limits in the presence of medial and lateral collateral ligament injuries and with a 7-N load added to the limb. However, valgus displacement is only consistently maintained within normal limits if no additional displacement force is added to the weight of the hand and forearm. The maintenance of valgus displacement is more sensitive to additional load and specifically to the extent of medial soft-tissue injury.     

The stability of the elbow following excision of the radial head and transection of the annular ligament

Summary The stabilizing role of the lateral ligament complex and the radial head were investigated in ten osteoligamentous elbow preparations. The annular ligament was the prime stabilizer of the lateral aspect of the elbow. Transection of the annular ligament caused maximal varus and external rotatory instability of 13.7° and 32.8° respectively, with an elbow flexion about 70°. Isolated excision of the radial head caused slight varus and external rotatory instability of 4.8° and 10.4° respectively, with an elbow flexion about 40°. The lateral collateral ligament had only a minor stabilizing function of the elbow. The stability of the elbow after excision of the radial head may be improved by proper preservation of the annular ligament.     

Kinematics of the ligamentous unstable elbow joint after application of a hinged external fixation device: a cadaveric study

We studied the kinematics of 8 ligamentous unstable elbow joint preparations after application of the Orthofix elbow external fixation device. Valgus, varus, external rotatory, and internal rotatory load tests were performed in lateral collateral ligament (LCL)-deficient and LCL/medial collateral ligament (MCL)-deficient joints. After placement of the fixator, the mean extension decreased significantly to 19.5 degrees +/- 7.2 degrees in the LCL-deficient joint and to 19.1 degrees +/- 6.6 degrees in the LCL/MCL-deficient joint compared with the mean extension of the intact joint, which was 10.5 degrees +/- 4.2 degrees. After application of the fixator, valgus displacement was significantly decreased by 4.0 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees in the LCL-deficient joint and by 3.6 degrees +/- 3.3 degrees in the LCL/MCL-deficient joint compared with the intact joint. External rotatory displacement was significantly decreased in the LCL-deficient joint by 4.9 degrees +/- 3.7 degrees and in the LCL/MCL-deficient joint by 5.0 degrees +/- 4.7 degrees. Internal rotatory displacement was significantly decreased by 3.3 degrees +/- 2.7 degrees in the LCL-deficient joint, but it was not significantly changed in the LCL/MCL-deficient joint. The Orthofix elbow external fixator guided elbow motion to a more varus position compared with the intact elbow and decreased the range of motion of the joint, constraining mainly extension. We conclude that the fixator stabilized the ligamentous unstable elbow joint efficiently but at the expense of changes in the normal motion pattern.     

重建肘关节外翻稳定性的生物力学研究

目的　评价肘关节桡骨头 (radial head,RH)切除、尺侧副韧带 (medial collateral ligament,MCL )损伤以及 RH假体置换、MCL重建后的外翻稳定性。　方法　新鲜成人尸体上肢标本 12侧 ,制成肘关节“骨 -韧带”标本 ,在2 N· m的外翻力矩作用下 ,分别在肘关节 0°、30°、6 0°、90°和 12 0°伸屈时 ,测量肘关节外翻松弛度 :1完整肘关节(n=12 ) ;2 MCL切断 (n=6 ) ;3RH切除 (n=6 ) ;4 MCL切断 +RH切除 (n=12 ) ;5 RH假体置换 (n=6 ) ;6 MCL重建(n=6 ) ;7RH假体置换 +MCL重建 (n=12 )。用 SPSS 10 .0统计软件包作方差分析 ,比较各组的外翻稳定性。　结果　完整肘关节的平均外翻松弛度最小 ;RH切除后 ,外翻松弛度增大 ;单纯 MCL切断 ,外翻松弛度大于单纯 RH切除 (P<0 .0 1) ;MCL切断 +RH切除 ,外翻稳定性最差 ;行 RH假体置换 ,对稳定性有改善 ;MCL重建与完整 MCL差异无统计学意义 (P>0 .0 5 ) ;RH假体置换同时重建 MCL ,效果最好。　结论　 MCL是抵抗肘关节外翻应力最主要的因素 ,RH是次要因素。在重建肘关节的外翻稳定性方面 ,MCL的重建比 RH的假体置换更重要。在无条件行 RH假体置换时 ,修复MCL是较好的手术方式。     

Fractures of the capitellum

Forty intact cadaver elbows were studied to determine the contribution of the capitellum to elbow stability. With the elbow at 10 degrees of flexion, valgus motion of the elbow after capitellum excision demonstrated a minimal increase. Although some increase in valgus motion did occur after capitellum excision and radial head resection it was not until the ulnar collateral ligament was released that a severe valgus deformity was produced. In addition, isolated capitellum excisions occurring with release of the medial collateral ligament produced severe valgus motion, demonstrating the importance of medial structures to elbow stability. The cadaver study suggests excision of the capitellum in the otherwise intact elbow has little effect on valgus motion. Over the past 15 years, 17 patients with fractures of the capitellum were treated. Followup at greater than 1 year utilizing various treatment modalities is reported. Although closed reduction gave the best result, acceptable results were also obtained by open reduction and internal fixation and excision. Our clinical findings corroborated the cadaver findings in that valgus instability of the elbow only occurred when fracture of the capitellum was associated with medial ligament injuries.     

Posterolateral dislocation of the elbow joint. Relationship to medial instability

BACKGROUND: Dislocation of the elbow joint is the second most common dislocation in the upper extremity, dislocation of the shoulder being the most common. It has been reported that uncomplicated dislocation of the elbow joint may be associated with a decreased range of motion, degenerative changes in the elbow joint, ectopic calcification, or neurological deficits. As the medial collateral ligament complex can be completely disrupted during dislocation, we evaluated the association between the long-term results of treatment of simple posterolateral dislocation of the elbow and the presence of persistent medial or valgus elbow instability. METHODS: Fifty patients who had a mean age of thirty-three years (range, eighteen to fifty-eight years) had closed reduction of a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow without associated fractures. The extremity was immobilized in an above-the-elbow plaster cast for three weeks. After a mean duration of follow-up of nine years (range, six to thirteen years), forty-one patients were evaluated with an interview, a physical examination, and radiographs made while a valgus load was applied to the elbow. RESULTS: The average score according to the system of The Hospital for Special Surgery was 91 points (range, 49 to 100 points), and thirty-one patients described their elbow function as good or excellent. Twenty-four patients had evidence of medial instability on radiographs made while a valgus load was applied to the elbow. Twenty-one patients had signs of degeneration of the joint, and twenty-five patients had ectopic ossification. Magnetic resonance imaging combined with arthrography was performed for the first twenty patients; eight had evidence of rupture of the medial collateral ligament, seven had generalized degenerative changes of the cartilage, and four had a chondral defect of the capitellum. (The study could not be completed for the remaining patient.) Medial instability on radiographs was correlated with signs of degeneration (p = 0.001), ectopic ossification (p = 0.01), a worse score according to the system of The Hospital for Special Surgery (p = 0.002), and persistent pain (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Posterolateral dislocation of the elbow joint can lead to persistent valgus instability that is associated with a worse overall clinical and radiographic result.     

Dynamic contributions of the flexor-pronator mass to elbow valgus stability

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that the demands placed on the medial ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow when it is subjected to valgus torque during throwing exceed its failure strength, which suggests the necessary dynamic contribution of muscle forces. We hypothesized that the flexor-pronator mass assists the medial ulnar collateral ligament in stabilizing the elbow against valgus torque. METHODS: Six cadaveric elbows were tested at 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion with no other constraints to motion. A full medial ulnar collateral ligament tear was simulated in each elbow. Muscle forces were simulated on the basis of the centroids and physiological cross-sectional areas of individual muscles. The biceps, brachialis, and triceps were simulated during flexor carpi ulnaris, flexor digitorum superficialis, flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor carpi ulnaris, and pronator teres-loading conditions. Kinematic data were obtained at each flexion angle with use of a three-dimensional digitizer. RESULTS: Release of the medial ulnar collateral ligament caused a significant increase in valgus instability of 5.9 degrees +/- 2.4 degrees at 30 degrees of elbow flexion and of 4.8 degrees +/- 2.0 degrees at 90 degrees of elbow flexion (p < 0.05). The differences in valgus angulation between each muscle-simulation condition and the medial ulnar collateral ligament-intact condition were significantly different from each other (p < 0.05), except for the difference between the flexor carpi ulnaris contraction condition and the flexor digitorum superficialis-flexor carpi ulnaris co-contraction condition. This co-contraction provided the most correction of the valgus angle in comparison with the intact condition at both 30 degrees and 90 degrees of elbow flexion (1.1 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees and 0.38 degrees +/- 2.3 degrees , respectively). Simulation of the flexor carpi ulnaris alone provided the greatest reduction of the valgus angle among all individual flexor-pronator mass muscles tested (p < 0.05), whereas simulation of the pronator teres alone provided the least reduction of the valgus angle (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The flexor-pronator mass dynamically stabilizes the elbow against valgus torque. The flexor carpi ulnaris is the primary stabilizer, and the flexor digitorum superficialis is a secondary stabilizer. The pronator teres provides the least dynamic stability.