Growth hormone treatment during suppression of early puberty in adopted girls

Girls adopted from developing countries often have early or precocious puberty, requiring treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. During such treatment decreased growth velocity is frequent. The aim of this investigation was to study whether the addition of growth hormone (GH) to GnRH analogue treatment improves height velocity and final height in girls with early or precocious puberty. Forty-six girls with early or precocious puberty adopted from developing countries were randomized for treatment with GnRH analogue or a combination of GH and GnRH analogue. After 2 y of treatment the mean growth in the GH/GnRH analogue group was significantly higher, 14.6 cm, compared to 10.9 cm in the control group. The increase in bone age did not differ, while the difference in predicted adult height increased by 2.7 cm in favour of the combination group. Although data on final height are not yet available, combined GH/GnRH analogue treatment for 2 y resulted in a higher growth velocity and predicted final height compared to GnRH analogue treatment alone.     

Growth, Growth Hormone and Sex Steroid Secretion in Girls with Central Precocious Puberty Treated with a Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Analogue

ABSTRACT. We have treated 14 girls with central precocious puberty for a mean period of 2.3 years (range, 0.5–3.9) with intranasal (D-Ser⁶) GnRH analogue administered in a mean dose of 28 μg/kg/day (range, 15–56). With the onset of treatment there was an initial increase in sitting height compared to subischial leg length, but overall there was no significant change in height standard deviation score for bone age. In this respect our results were indistinguishable from untreated children with central precocious puberty. There was a decrease in physiological GH secretion, associated with decreased sex steroid secretion, which probably accounts for the growth deceleration which has been described during GnRH analogue therapy. The effect of this growth deceleration combined with slowing of the rate of epiphyseal maturation may explain the absence of alteration in height prognosis.     

Management of Growth Hormone Deficiency Through Puberty

ABSTRACT. As a model of the growth hormone (GH) dependence of growth in prepuberty and puberty, the growth of 182 children (93 boys, 89 girls) who survived in first remission for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia was examined. Chemotherapy regimens, including intrathecal methotrexate, were similar in all patients, but CNS treatment differed, in that one group received 2400 cGy cranial irradiation, while the other received 1800 cGy. There was a significant decrease in height SDS during prepuberty, which was equivalent in both sexes, whereas there was a much greater decrease in pubertal growth in girls than in boys. Girls treated with the lower dose regimen of cranial irradiation had their onset of pubertal maturation significantly advanced, to a mean of 9.9 years ( p < 0.001). Previous studies have indicated that the duration of puberty is shortened by GH treatment in patients with idiopathic multiple pituitary hormone deficiency or isolated GH deficiency (GHD). To determine whether an increase in the dose of GH administered during the adolescent growth spurt would improve final height, a prospective randomized trial was performed in 32 children (25 boys, 7 girls) with isolated GHD treated with a GH dose regimen of 15 IU/m²/week as daily s.c. injections. At the onset of the pubertal growth spurt, the patients were randomized either to an unchanged dose or to 30 IU/m²/week. There was no significant change in height velocity with the doubled dose of GH, but there was a trend in the advancement of pubertal maturation which was considered to be dose related. It is suggested that these findings are of relevance to the treatment of GHD in puberty, especially in girls with early or precocious puberty occurring as a consequence of low-dose cranial irradiation. It is concluded that optimum final heights may not be achieved in these patients without the therapeutic manipulation of the onset and/or duration of puberty.     

Long-term results of GnRH analogue (Buserelin) treatment in girls with central precocious puberty

The GnRH analogue Buserelin was given for one year to six girls with central precocious puberty in a daily subcutaneous dose of 20 micrograms/kg/day. A decrease of plasma estradiol and vaginal maturation index to prepubertal values was obtained in 5 out of 6 cases. Bone maturation decreased and final predicted adult height improved significantly. This analogue of GnRH appears to be an effective medication for gonadotropin dependent precocious puberty in girls.     

Long-Term Results of GnRH Analogue (Buserelin) Treatment in Girls with Central Precocious Puberty

ABSTRACT. The GnRH analogue Buserelin was given for one year to six girls with central precocious puberty in a daily subcutaneous dose of 20 μg/kg/day. A decrease of plasma estradiol and vaginal maturation index to prepubertal values was obtained in 5 out of 6 cases. Bone maturation decreased and final predicted adult height improved significantly. This analogue of GnRH appears to be an effective medication for gonadotropin dependent precocious puberty in girls.     

Growth, growth hormone and sex steroid secretion in girls with central precocious puberty treated with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue

We have treated 14 girls with central precocious puberty for a mean period of 2.3 years (range, 0.5-3.9) with intranasal (D-Ser6) GnRH analogue administered in a mean dose of 28 micrograms/kg/day (range, 15-56). With the onset of treatment there was an initial increase in sitting height compared to subischial leg length, but overall there was no significant change in height standard deviation score for bone age. In this respect our results were indistinguishable from untreated children with central precocious puberty. There was a decrease in physiological GH secretion, associated with decreased sex steroid secretion, which probably accounts for the growth deceleration which has been described during GnRH analogue therapy. The effect of this growth deceleration combined with slowing of the rate of epiphyseal maturation may explain the absence of alteration in height prognosis.     

Efficacy of combined treatment with growth hormone and gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue in children with poor prognosis of adult height

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to study the role of combination therapy of growth hormone and Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues in girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty (CPP) or idiopathic short stature (ISS). METHODS: Five girls with CPP (median age 9.1 y, pubertal stage 2-3) (3 of them previously treated with GnRH analogue (GnRHa) for 16.2 +/- 0.3 months) and 8 girls with ISS (median age 11.4 y, pubertal stage 2-3) (previously treated with GH for 10.95 +/- 1.42 months), were treated with recombinant human GH (0.33 mg/kg/week) and GnRHa (3.75 mg/28 days) for 22 months. RESULTS: Height of girls with CPP improved from - 1.3 to - 0.2 SDS and height for BA from - 2.1 to - 0.6 SDS (P = 0.042). Predicted adult height (PAH) improved from - 3.1 to - 0.6 SDS (P = 0.042). In girls with ISS only PAH improved from - 3.0 to - 1.5 SDS (P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Combined treatment improves height and PAH in CPP. Height in ISS is also improved however not significantly.     

Effect of combined treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue and growth hormone in patients with central precocious puberty who had subnormal growth velocity and impaired height prognosis

Growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-I status and response to growth hormone therapy (0.6 IU/kg/week sc, six times a week for 12 months) were evaluated in 12 girls (chronological age 9.4 ± 1.6 years) suffering from central precocious puberty with growth velocity less than 4 cm/year and no substantial increase or decrease in predicted adult height during gonadotropin releasing hormone (Gn-RH) analogue treatment (D-Trp⁶-LH-RH, 60 μg/kg im/28 days). At baseline, large variations were observed in nocturnal growth hormone (GH) means (pathological values (< 3.6μg/l) 33.3%), stimulated levodopa GH peaks (pathological values (<10.0 μg/I) 28.6%) and serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. Neither GH nor IGF-I levels were correlated with growth velocity. During recombinant GH therapy, growth velocity increased significantly (baseline 3.0 ± 0.9 cm/year; 6 months 6.4 ± 1.9cm/year, p < 0.001 versus baseline; 12 months 6.0 ± 1.3cm/year, p < 0.001 versus baseline). There was a significant increase in height SDS for bone age (baseline –1.6 ±0.5 SDS; 12 months -1.04 ± 0.6SDS; p < 0.002) and in predicted adult height (baseline 152.0 ± 3.6cm; 12 months 155.9 ± 3.4cm; p < 0.002). Our results suggest that combined therapy with Gn-RH analogues and recombinant GH can improve growth velocity and predicted adult height in girls with central precocious puberty and impaired height prognosis during Gn-RH analogue treatment.     

Growth in precocious puberty

Growth in precocious puberty is a subject of concern to families and clinicians alike. The definition of precocious puberty and the role of obesity in the age of onset have also been areas of debate since the Lawson Wilkins Society recommended a lowering of the age of onset of precocious puberty in US girls. An understanding of growth patterns in normal children with earlier or later onset of puberty and the variable rate of progression between individuals with central precocious puberty as well as the imprecision in available height prediction methods are important in assessing height outcomes in this condition. In the absence of randomised controlled trials in this area, only qualified conclusions about the effectiveness of interventions can be drawn. In general, it appears that height outcome is not compromised in untreated slowly progressive variants of central precocious puberty. In rapidly progressing central precocious puberty in girls, gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH agonists) appear to increase final height by about 5cm in girls treated before the age of eight, but there is no height benefit in those treated after eight years. Scanly data is available to assess treatment effects in boys. GnRH agonists appear to be relatively safe. The decision to treat central precocious puberty should take into account rate of progression of pubertal changes as well as biochemical markers and may need to address other factors (for example psychosocial and behavioural issues) as well as height outcome.     

Longitudinal growth and height velocity of Japanese children with Down's syndrome

Aim: To determine the natural growth pattern of Japanese children with Down's syndrome. Methods: Longitudinal height data of 85 patients (43 males, 42 females) from birth to final height were analyzed. Based on these data, semi-longitudinal standard growth curves and height velocity curves for Down's syndrome were drawn. Results: The means ± SD of final height of males and females with Down's syndrome were 153.2 ± 5.6 and 141.9 ± 4.2 cm, respectively. They were -3.0 SD and -2.8 SD for Japanese standards. Mean peak height velocities were 8.9 and 7.5 cm y[Formula: See Text], and the ages at peak height velocity were 11.6 and 10.2 y for males and females, respectively.

Conclusion: The mean height of patients with Down's syndrome was around -2 SD for normal children before puberty. Their pubertal growth spurt starts about 1 y earlier and their peak height velocity was about 1.3-1.4 cm shorter than for normal children.     

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol suppression and growth in girls with central precocious puberty: is more suppression better? Are pre-injection LH levels useful in monitoring treatment?

CONTEXT: Girls with central precocious puberty (CPP) are treated with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues to suppress puberty. Gonadotropin levels are used to monitor treatment, since estradiol is difficult to measure at low levels. The optimal degree of hormonal suppression is still unknown. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that in girls treated for CPP, estradiol levels (by ultrasensitive bioassay) would correlate with the rate of skeletal maturation and linear growth velocity. We asked whether predicted height would improve with greater luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol suppression. We also compared pre- and post-injection LH levels for monitoring treatment. DESIGN: Thirty girls with CPP were followed for up to 2 years during treatment with leuprolide acetate depot at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/28 days. We measured LH and estradiol levels, bone age, and growth velocity every 6 months. RESULTS: Estradiol levels were suppressed to below the detection limit in three-quarters of the girls and did not correlate with the rate of skeletal maturation or linear growth. Improvement in predicted height correlated significantly with lower pre-injection LH levels. These girls have some of the lowest estradiol and LH levels, best improvement in predicted height, and least amount of bone age advancement published to date. Pre- and post-leuprolide injection LH levels were positively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Greater LH suppression may improve height outcome in girls treated for CPP with GnRH analogues. The degree of LH suppression achieved is individualized and not necessarily related to absolute dose. Pre-injection LH levels may be useful for monitoring treatment. Ultrasensitive estradiol levels were very low and usually unmeasurable, affirming the increased suppression at the higher doses of GnRH analogue used in these girls. Further investigation is needed, with longer treatment duration, a range of doses, and ultimately final height. Until such studies are completed, clinicians should be cautious when interpreting pubertal suppression.     

Pubertal height gain in Ullrich-Turner syndrome

Short stature and ovarian failure are the main features in Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS). The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the influence of age at initiation of puberty on final height. Sixty-five girls were treated with growth hormone (GH) and had a final height of 150.6 +/- 5.7 cm; 12/65 entered puberty spontaneously. A non-GH treated group of 12 girls with UTS reached a final height of 147.3 +/- 6.6 cm. Subdividing the GH treated group (n = 53) based on the age at induction of puberty, before or after 13 years, there was no significant difference in final height. Final height was affected by the age at which GH treatment was initiated, height SDS at the beginning of puberty, and by the duration of GH therapy. Therefore, early treatment with GH for short stature in UTS should be attempted so that an age adequate initiation of puberty will be feasible.     

Final height and pubertal growth in Japanese patients with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening

Aim: To investigate the final adult heights and pubertal growth patterns in Japanese patients with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) detected by neonatal screening. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of female patients >15 y of age (n = 18) and male patients >18 y of age (n = 9), who were detected by neonatal screening and kept on continuous thyroid hormone replacement therapy. Final height standard deviation scores (FHSDS) and target height standard deviation scores (THSDS) were determined. Parameters characterizing the pubertal growth process (such as age at onset of pubertal growth spurt and age at peak pubertal growth) were obtained from each patient's growth rate chart. Menarchial age was determined in each female patient by reviewing the medical record. The impact on FHSDS of the etiology of CH, the severity of CH, the time of initiation of therapy and the adequacy of treatment during the first year of life was assessed. Results: All patients had received initial thyroid hormone treatment no later than 50 d of age, and had reached their final height. The mean FHSDS for female and male patients were +0.17 ± 0.99 and -0.03 ± 0.99, respectively. The mean FHSDS-THSDS for female and male patients was +0.09 ± 0.77 and -0.19 ± 0.53, respectively. No difference was seen in pubertal growth parameters for either gender compared with that of the reference population, except for a greater peak height velocity and pubertal height gain in male patients. The mean menarchial age was identical to that of the reference population. No significant relationship was found between the FHSDS and any of the factors investigated.

Conclusion: The adult height of patients with CH detected by neonatal screening was equivalent to that of the reference population and their target height. As long as early intervention and satisfactory management are ensured, severe CH does not appear to reduce final adult height.     

Combined therapy with GnRH analog plus growth hormone in central precocious puberty

GnRH analogues (GnRHa) arrest pubertal development, and slow growth velocity (GV) and bone maturation, thus improving adult height in central precocious puberty (CPP). In some patients, however, GV decreases to such an extent that it compromises the improvement in predicted adult height (PAH) and therefore the addition of GH is suggested. Of 20 patients with idiopathic CPP (treated with GnRHa [depot-triptorelin] at a dose of 100 microg/kg every 21 days i.m. for at least 2-3 yr) whose GV fell below the 25th percentile for chronological age (CA), ten received, in addition to the GnRHa, GH at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/wk, s.c. 6 days weekly, for 2-4 yr. Ten patients matched for BA, CA, and duration of GnRHa treatment who showed the same growth pattern but refused GH treatment, served to evaluate the efficacy of the addition of GH. No patient showed classical GH deficiency. Both groups discontinued treatment at a comparable BA (mean +/- SEM): 13.2 +/- 0.2 yr in GnRHa + GH vs 13.0 +/- 0.1 yr in the control group. At the conclusion of the study all the patients had achieved adult height. Adult height was considered to be attained when the growth during the preceding year was less than 1 cm, with a BA of over 15 yr. Patients of the group treated with GH + GnRHa showed an adult height significantly higher (p<0.001) than pretreatment PAH (160.6 +/- 1.3 vs 152.7 +/- 1.7 cm). Height SDS for BA significantly increased from -1.5 +/- 0.2 at start of GnRHa to -0.21 +/- 0.2 at adult height (p<0.001). Target height was significantly exceeded. The GnRH alone treated group reached an adult height not significantly higher than pretreatment PAH (157.1 +/- 2.5 vs 155.5 +/- 1.9 cm). Height SDS for BA did not change (from -1.0 +/- 0.3 at start of GnRHa to -0.7 +/- 0.4 at adult height). Target height was just reached but not significantly exceeded. The gain in centimeters obtained calculated between pretreatment PAH and final height was 7.9 +/- 1.1 cm in patients treated with GH combined with GnRH analogue while in patients treated with GnRH analogue alone the gain was just 1.6 cm +/- 1.2 (p=0.001). Furthermore, no side effects, bone age progression, or ovarian cysts, were observed in GnRHa + GH treated patients. In conclusion, a gain of 7.9 cm in adult height represents a significant improvement which justifies the addition of GH for 2-3 yr to conventional treatment with GnRH analogues in patients with central precocious puberty, and with a decrease in growth velocity so marked as to impair predicted adult height to below the third percentile.     

Improved final height with long-term growth hormone treatment in Noonan syndrome

Aim: To assess whether children with Noonan syndrome on long-term growth hormone (GH) therapy improve their final height to near mid-parental height. Methods: Twenty-five prepubertal children (13 girls) with Noonan syndrome (NS) were studied. A single clinician made the diagnosis based on clinical criteria. GH treatment started at an age ranging from 3.1 to 13.8 y and was continued for at least 2 y. Improvement or “gain” in final height (FH) was defined as either the difference between adult height SD scores (SDS) and pre-treatment height SDS (the childhood component of the Swedish reference) or height SDS compared to the Noonan reference. Results: Ten children received a GH dose of 33 μg/kg/d (mean age at start 7.7±2.1 y, mean age at stop 17.6±1.7 y) and 15 received a dose of 66 μg/kg/d (mean age at start 8.6±3.3 y, mean age at stop 18.4±2.1 y). Eighteen out of 25 patients reached FH. A substantial improvement in FH of 1.7 SDS, equivalent to 10.4 cm compared to pre-treatment height, was observed. No significant difference was seen between the two GH doses. Females gained a mean height of 9.8 cm and males 1-13 cm (FH 174.5±7.8 cm vs mean adult height of 162.5±5.4 cm for males with NS) at final height. Moreover, 60% reached a mid-parental height of±1 SD.

Conclusion: GH treatment improves final height in patients with Noonan syndrome, with a mean gain of 1.7 SDS. The prepubertal height gain is maintained to final height and the children achieve a height close to their mid-parental height.     

Use of GnRH agonists in GH-deficient patients: arguments for and against. The case for GnRH agonists in GH-deficient patients

The use of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in growth hormone (GH)-deficient children remains controversial. Evidence suggests that GnRH agonists can improve adult height by delaying epiphyseal closure, thereby allowing more time for growth during puberty. However, long-term treatment (>3 years) with GnRH agonists is needed to achieve significant growth, likely related to growth rate deceleration with GnRH agonists. In addition, the height gained following GnRH agonist treatment may not be significantly greater than that achieved with GH treatment alone. The timely diagnosis of GH deficiency and the initiation of GH therapy prior to puberty may provide sufficient height gains such that GnRH agonist therapy may be unnecessary. A clinician must balance multiple issues when considering GnRH agonist therapy, including physical concerns, such as reduced bone mineralization, psychological concerns stemming from significantly delaying puberty, as well as cost:benefit analysis. This review debates the use of GnRH agonist therapy in GH-deficient children.     

Effects of combined gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and growth hormone therapy on adult height in precocious puberty: a further contribution

Out of 35 girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty (CPP) treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) (depot-triptorelin) at a dose of 100 microg/kg every 21 days i.m. for at least 2-3 years whose growth velocity fell below the 25th percentile for chronological age (CA), 17 received growth hormone (GH) in addition at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/week, s.c., 6 days per week, for 2-4 years. The other 18, matched for bone age (BA), CA and duration of GnRHa treatment, who showed the same growth pattern but refused GH treatment, remained on GnRHa alone, and were used as a control group to evaluate GH efficacy. No patient was GH deficient. Both groups discontinued treatment at a comparable BA (mean +/- SD): BA 13.4 +/- 0.6 in GnRHa plus GH group vs 13.0 +/- 0.5 years in the GnRHa alone group. The 35 patients have reached adult height (i.e. growth during the preceding year was less than 1 cm, with a BA of over 15 years). Patients of the group treated with GH plus GnRHa showed an adult height (161.2 +/- 4.8 cm) significantly higher (p < 0.001) than pre-treatment predicted adult height (PAH) calculated according to tables either for accelerated girls (153.2 +/- 5.0 cm) or for average girls (148.6 +/- 4.3 cm). The adult height of the GnRH alone treated group (156.6 +/- 5.7) was not significantly higher than pre-treatment PAH if calculated on Bayley and Pinneau tables for accelerated girls (153.9 +/- 3.8 cm), whilst it remained significantly higher if calculated on tables for average girls (149.6 +/- 4.0 cm) (p < 0.001). The gain between pre-treatment PAH and final height was 8.2 +/- 4.8 cm according to tables for accelerated girls and 12.7 +/- 4.8 cm according to tables for average girls in patients treated with GH plus GnRHa; while in patients treated with GnRH alone the gain calculated between pre-treatment PAH for accelerated girls was just 2.3 +/- 2.9 cm and 7.1 +/- 2.7 cm greater than pre-treatment PAH for average girls. The difference between the gain obtained in the two groups (about 6 cm) remained the same, however PAH was calculated. The addition of GH to GnRHa in a larger cohort of patients with CPP with a longer follow-up confirms the safety of the combined treatment and the still significant but more variable gain in the group with the combined treatment, probably due to the larger number of patients analyzed. Caution is advised in using such an invasive and expensive treatment, and there is need for further studies before widespread clinical use outside a research setting.     

Combination growth hormone and gonadotropin releasing hormone analog therapy in 11beta-hydroxylase deficiency

Diagnosis of 11beta-hydroxylase deficiency was made in a boy at the age of 2 1/2 years on the basis of peripheral precocious puberty, growth acceleration (height standard deviation score +4.4) with advanced skeletal maturation (bone age 8.4 years) and elevated deoxycortisol levels. Glucocorticoid supplementation led to normalization of blood pressure but was associated with progression to central precocious puberty and increase in bone age resulting in decrease in predicted adult height to 133.7 cm (target height 163 cm). The child was started on GnRH analog (triptorelin 3.75 mg every 28 days), which led to improvement in predicted adult height by 3.1 cm over 15 months. Addition of growth hormone (0.1 IU/kg/day) resulted in improvement in predicted adult height (151 cm) and height deficit (12 cm) over the next 3.6 years. Final height (151 cm) exceeded predicted height at the initiation of GnRH analog treatment by 17.3 cm. This report suggests that combination GH and GnRH analog treatment may be useful in improving height outcome in children with 11beta-hydroxylase deficiency and compromised final height.     

When and how to combine growth hormone with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue

The effect of combined treatment with growth hormone (GH) and a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue, or GH alone, on pubertal height gain was assessed in an uncontrolled study in 15 boys and 10 girls with GH deficiency (GHD). Seven boys and six girls were treated with GH alone (group 1), and eight boys and four girls were treated with a combination of GH and an LHRH analogue during puberty (group 2). Mean ages (+/- SD) at the start of GH treatment and at the onset of puberty were significantly lower in group 2 (8.0 +/- 3.3 years and 11.2 +/- 0.8 years, respectively, in boys, and 6.3 +/- 1.6 years and 10.8 +/- 0.7 years in girls) than in group 1 (12.8 +/- 1.9 years and 13.7 +/- 1.4 years in boys, and 11.2 +/- 1.0 years and 12.5 +/- 1.2 years in girls). Height at the onset of puberty was less in group 2 than in group 1, but the difference was significant only for the boys. Combination treatment was started at a mean age of 11.7 +/- 1.2 years in boys and 11.5 +/- 1.0 years in girls. The duration of the combination treatment was 5.1 +/- 1.5 years in boys and 2.3 +/- 0.7 years in girls. The duration of the period between the onset of puberty and the end of GH treatment was significantly longer in group 2 (6.8 +/- 1.2 years in boys and 5.5 +/- 1.0 years in girls) than in group 1 (4.3 +/- 1.6 years in boys and 3.6 +/- 1.4 years in girls). The pubertal height gain was also significantly greater in group 2 (36.7 +/- 6.5 cm in boys and 29.0 +/- 8.3 cm in girls) than in group 1 (21.9 +/- 4.1 cm in boys and 18.6 +/- 4.1 cm in girls). Final height was significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1 in boys. Although there was no significant difference in final height between groups in the girls, the change in height SDS from the start of GH treatment until final height was significantly greater in group 2 (2.7 +/- 1.6 in boys and 4.5 +/- 0.5 SD in girls) than in group 1 (1.0 +/- 0.8 in boys and 1.8 +/- 0.9 SD in girls), in both boys and girls. In conclusion, it appears that combination of an LHRH analogue and GH may increase the pubertal height gain and the final height of children with GHD. The improvement is attributed to the prolongation of the treatment period, permitting slow bone maturation, and to the maintenance of height velocity. This combination treatment appears to be more effective in boys than girls. To fully assess this therapeutic approach, prospective controlled studies are needed.     

Predictive factors for the effect of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue therapy on the height of girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty

The factors influencing the final height of central precocious puberty patients treated with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues remain a critical issue. This study compares the predicted final height before and after GnRH analogue therapy to identify predictive factors for final height. Fourteen girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty were treated with a GnRH analogue. All had an active non-regressive form before therapy, full and permanent suppression of oestrogenic activity during therapy (duration >2 years, 3.1±0.3 years, mean ±SEM), and the pubertal pituitary-ovarian axis had normalized in all of them 1 year after the cessation of therapy. The mean predicted final height increased from 152±1.8 cm before therapy to 162.2±1.2 cm (P<0.01) at the last evaluation performed 4.5±0.3 years after the onset of therapy. The mean gain in predicted final height between the onset of therapy and the last evaluation was 10.2±1.1 cm. It was correlated with the following data recorded at the onset of therapy: bone age advance over chronological age (r=0.66,P<0.02), predicted final height at the onset of therapy (r=–0.76,P<0.001), and the difference between the target height and the predicted height at onset of therapy (r=0.76,P<0.001). We conclude that GnRH analogue therapy is more likely to improve final height prognosis in girls who initially present with a markedly advanced bone age and a great difference between their target and predicted heights. Both these parameters reflect the severity of the disease at diagnosis.This work was presented in part at the international symposium on GnRH analogues in cancer and human reproduction, Geneva, November 1990. Abstract, Gynecol Endocrinol 4 [Suppl 2]:101 (1990)