Preservation of the incretin effect after orthotopic pancreas transplantation in inbred rats.

To establish whether the incretin effect is under neural control, insulin, C-peptide, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) responses and hepatic insulin clearance were investigated after oral and "isoglycemic" intravenous glucose in 12 inbred rats after denervation of the pancreas by orthotopic transplantation with portal venous drainage (Tx group) and in 12 laparotomized controls (sham group). Effective pancreas denervation was documented by a decreased pancreatic polypeptide (PP) response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia and by decreased levels of norepinephrine and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in pancreatic tissue. Basal and incremental arterial plasma glucose integrated over 180 minutes did not differ between oral and intravenous glucose, but the integrated insulin response (mean +/- SEM) was significantly greater with oral versus intravenous glucose (Tx group, 104.9 +/- 22.0 v 31.0 +/- 4.9 nmol x L(-1) x min, P < .01; sham group, 79.5 +/- 10.6 v 36.6 +/- 5.8 nmol x L(-1) x min, P < .01). The integrated response of C-peptide was similar during both tests (Tx group, 105 +/- 14 v 79 +/- 8 pmol x mL(-1) x min; sham group, 112 +/- 10 v 121 +/- 12 pmol x mL(-1) x min). Hepatic insulin clearance was significantly decreased in both groups by oral compared with intravenous glucose administration (Tx group, 1.3 +/- 0.2 v 3.3 +/- 0.6 mmol/mmol, P < .01; sham group, 1.6 +/- 0.1 v 3.9 +/- 0.6 mmol/mmol, P < .02). The incretin effects for insulin (Tx group, 5.6 +/- 2.7; sham group, 3.0 +/- 0.8) and C-peptide (Tx group, 1.4 +/- 0.2; sham group, 1.1 +/- 0.2), calculated as the ratio of the integrated oral response and integrated intravenous response, and GIP responses to oral and intravenous glucose were not significantly different between the two groups. We conclude that there is preservation of the incretin effect in rats with orthotopically transplanted and hence extrinsically denervated pancreas, thus ruling out the possibility that the autonomic nervous system substantially contributes. Hepatic insulin clearance and insulinotropic hormones such as GIP appear to be more important.     

Defective amplification of the late phase insulin response to glucose by GIP in obese Type II diabetic patients

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) is strongly insulinotropic in patients with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, whereas glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is less effective. Our investigation evaluated "early" (protocol 1) - and "late phase" (protocol 2) insulin and C-peptide responses to GLP-1 and GIP stimulation in patients with Type II diabetes. METHODS: Protocol 1: eight Type II diabetic patients and eight matched healthy subjects received i.v. bolus injections of GLP-1(2.5 nmol) or GIP(7.5 nmol) concomitant with an increase of plasma glucose to 15 mmol/l. Protocol 2: eight Type II diabetic patients underwent a hyperglycaemic clamp (15 mmol/l) with infusion (per kg body weight/min) of either: 1 pmol GLP-1 (7-36) amide (n=8), 4 pmol GIP (n=8), 16 pmol GIP (n=4) or no incretin hormone (n=5). For comparison, six matched healthy subjects were examined. RESULTS: Protocol 1: Type II diabetic patients were characterised by a decreased "early phase" response to both stimuli, but their relative response to GIP versus GLP-1 stimulation was exactly the same as in healthy subjects [insulin (C-peptide): patients 59+/-9% (74+/-6%) and healthy subjects 62+/-5% (71+/-9%)]. Protocol 2, "Early phase" (0-20 min) insulin response to glucose was delayed and reduced in the patients, but enhanced slightly and similarly by GIP and GLP-1. GLP-1 augmented the "late phase" (20-120 min) insulin secretion to levels similar to those observed in healthy subjects. In contrast, the "late phase" responses to both doses of GIP were not different from those obtained with glucose alone. Accordingly, glucose infusion rates required to maintain the hyperglycaemic clamp in the "late phase" period (20-120 min) were similar with glucose alone and glucose plus GIP, whereas a doubling of the infusion rate was required during GLP-1 stimulation. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Lack of GIP amplification of the late phase insulin response to glucose, which contrasts markedly to the normalising effect of GLP-1, could be a key defect in insulin secretion in Type II diabetic patients.     

Similar insulin secretory response to a gastric inhibitory polypeptide bolus injection at euglycemia in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes and control subjects

Insulin secretion following the intravenous infusion of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is diminished in patients with type 2 diabetes and at least a subgroup of their first-degree relatives at hyperglycemic clamp conditions. Therefore, we studied the effects of an intravenous bolus administration of GIP at normoglycemic conditions in the fasting state. Ten healthy control subjects were studied with an intravenous bolus administration of placebo, and of 7, 20, and 60 pmol GIP/kg body weight (BW), respectively. Forty-five first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes and 33 matched control subjects were studied with (1) a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and (2) an intravenous bolus injection of 20 pmol GIP/kg BW with blood samples drawn over 30 minutes for determination of plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and GIP. Statistical analysis applied repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's post hoc tests. Insulin secretion was stimulated after the administration of 20 and of 60 pmol GIP/kg BW in the dose-response experiments (P <.0001). GIP administration (20 pmol/kg BW) led to a significant rise of insulin and C-peptide concentrations in the first-degree relatives and control subjects (P <.0001), but there was difference between groups (P =.64 and P =.87, respectively). Also expressed as increments over baseline, no differences were apparent (Delta(insulin), 7.6 +/- 1.2 and 7.6 +/- 1.6 mU/L, P =.99; Delta(C-peptide), 0.35 +/- 0.06 and 0.38 +/- 0.08 ng/mL, P =.75). Integrated insulin and C-peptide responses after GIP administration significantly correlated with the respective insulin and C-peptide responses after glucose ingestion (insulin, r = 0.78, P <.0001; C-peptide, r = 0.35, P =.0015). We conclude that a reduced insulinotropic effect of GIP in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes cannot be observed at euglycemia. Therefore, a reduced GIP-induced insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and their first-degree relatives at hyperglycemia is more likely due to a general defect of B-cell function than to a specific defect of the GIP action.     

Insulin and glucagon secretion are suppressed equally during both hyper- and euglycemia by moderate hyperinsulinemia in patients with diabetes mellitus

Hyper- and euglycemic clamp studies were performed in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus to examine the effects of exogenous insulin administration on insulin and glucagon secretion. Plasma glucose was kept at the fasting level [mean, 10.0 +/- 0.2 (+/- SE) mmol/L; hyperglycemic clamp], and graded doses of insulin (1, 3, and 10 mU/kg.min, each for 50 min) were infused. The plasma C-peptide level gradually decreased from 523 +/- 66 to 291 +/- 43 pmol/L (n = 13; P less than 0.005) by the end of the hyperglycemic clamp study. After 90 min of equilibration with euglycemia (5.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/L; euglycemic clamp), the same insulin infusion protocol caused a similar decrease in the plasma C-peptide level. With the same glucose clamp protocol, physiological hyperinsulinemia for 150 min (676 +/- 40 pmol/L), obtained by the infusion of 2 mU/kg.min insulin, caused suppression of the plasma C-peptide level from 536 +/- 119 to 273 +/- 65 pmol/L during hyperglycemia and from 268 +/- 41 to 151 +/- 23 pmol/L during euglycemia (n = 9; P less than 0.005 in each clamp). Plasma glucagon was suppressed to a similar degree in both glycemic states. These results demonstrate that 1) insulin secretion in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is suppressed by high physiological doses of exogenous insulin in both the hyper- and euglycemic states, the degree of inhibition being independent of the plasma glucose level; and 2) glucagon secretion is also inhibited by such doses of exogenous insulin.     

Enhanced glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) response to oral glucose in glucose-intolerant HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), which are major regulators of glucose tolerance through the stimulation of insulin secretion, contribute to impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) among HIV-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: Eighteen HIV-infected male patients (six lipodystrophic and 12 nonlipodystrophic) with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were compared with 10 HIV-infected male patients (eight lipodystrophic and two nonlipodystrophic) with IGT. Plasma concentrations of GLP-1 and GIP were determined frequently during a 3-h, 75-g glucose tolerance test. Insulin secretion rates (ISRs) were calculated by deconvolution of C-peptide concentrations. RESULTS: The incremental area under the curve (incrAUC) for GLP-1 was increased by 250% in IGT patients compared with NGT patients (1455+/-422 vs. 409+/-254 pmol/L/180 min, respectively; P<0.05), whereas the incrAUC for GIP did not differ between the study groups (7689+/-1097 vs. 8041+/-998 pmol/L/180 min, respectively; not significant). In pooled study groups, the GIP incrAUC correlated positively with the ISR incrAUC without adjustment (r=0.38, P<0.05) and following adjustment for glucose incrAUC (r=0.49, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest: (1) that glucose-intolerant, HIV-infected male patients may display enhanced GLP-1 responses to oral glucose compared with normal glucose-tolerant HIV-infected male patients, which may represent a compensatory mechanism rather than explain the IGT; (2) that the GIP response may be associated with ISR independently of plasma glucose in nondiabetic HIV-infected males on HAART.     

Glyburide enhances the responsiveness of the beta-cell to glucose but does not correct the abnormal patterns of insulin secretion in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Eleven patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were studied before and after 6-10 weeks of glyburide therapy. Patients were studied during a 24-h period on a mixed diet comprising 30 Cal/kg divided into three meals. The following day a hyperglycemic clamp study was performed, with glucose levels clamped at 300 mg/dL (16.7 mmol/L) for a 3-h period. Insulin secretion rates were calculated by deconvolution of peripheral C-peptide concentrations using individual C-peptide clearance kinetics derived after bolus injection of biosynthetic human C-peptide. After 6-10 weeks on glyburide, the identical studies were repeated. In response to glyburide, the fasting plasma glucose level decreased from 12.3 +/- 1.2 to 6.8 +/- 0.9 mmol/L. Although the mean glucose over the 24 h of the meal study decreased from 12.7 +/- 1.4 to 10.8 +/- 1.2 mmol/L, postprandial hyperglycemia persisted on therapy, and after breakfast, glucose levels exceeded 10 mmol/L and did not return to fasting levels for the remainder of the day. Fasting serum insulin, plasma C-peptide, and the insulin secretion rate were not different before (152 +/- 48 pmol/L, 0.82 +/- 0.16 pmol/mL, and 196 +/- 34 pmol/min, respectively) and after (186 +/- 28 pmol/L, 0.91 +/- 0.11 pmol/mL, and 216 +/- 23 pmol/min, respectively) glyburide treatment despite lowering of the glucose level. However, average insulin and C-peptide concentrations over the 24-h period increased from 366 +/- 97 pmol/L and 1.35 +/- 0.19 pmol/mL to 434 +/- 76 pmol/L and 1.65 +/- 0.15 pmol/mL, respectively. The total amount of insulin secreted over the 24-h period rose from 447 +/- 58 nmol before therapy to 561 +/- 55 nmol while receiving glyburide. Insulin secretion was demonstrated to be pulsatile in all subjects, with periodicity ranging from 2-2.5 h. The number of insulin secretory pulses was not altered by glyburide, whereas pulse amplitude was enhanced after lunch and dinner, suggesting that the increased insulin secretion is characterized by increased amplitude of the individual pulses. In response to a hyperglycemic clamp at 300 mg/dL (16.7 mmol/L), insulin secretion rose more than 2-fold, from 47 +/- 9 nmol over the 3-h period before treatment to 103 +/- 21 nmol after glyburide therapy. We conclude that the predominant mechanism of action of glyburide in patients receiving therapy for 6-10 weeks is to increase the responsiveness of the beta-cell to glucose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

A supplementary infusion of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) with a meal does not significantly improve the beta cell response or glucose tolerance in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 6) were studied on two separate days after overnight fasts. On each day they were given a 500-kcal mixed meal plus an infusion of either porcine glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) (0.75 pmol/kg/min) or control solution (CS) from 0 to 30 min in random order. Frequent measurements of plasma glucose, C-peptide, insulin and GIP concentrations were made. Fasting GIP levels were similar on both days. During the meal plus GIP infusion plasma GIP levels increased from a basal value of 7.6 +/- 1.5 pmol/1 to a peak of 88.6 +/- 5.4 pmol/1 at 30 min. Following the meal infusion of CS GIP increased from a fasting level of 10.3 +/- 1.2 pmol/1 to a significantly lower peak of 58.0 +/- 8.3 pmol/1 at 60 min. During the meal plus GIP infusion GIP levels were higher at 10-45 min and at 90 min (P less than 0.05-0.001). Fasting and postprandial glucose, C-peptide and insulin levels were, however, similar on both study day. A supplementary infusion of porcine GIP with a mixed meal did not significantly alter the beta cell response or glucose tolerance in this group of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Studies of the Entero-insular Axis Following Pancreas Transplantation in Man: Neural or Hormonal Control?

To study the role of hormonal and neural factors in the control of the entero-insular axis the insulin, C-peptide, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) responses to oral and intravenous glucose were investigated in 5 patients who had received a combined kidney and paratopic pancreas transplant, with physiological portal venous drainage. The incremental areas under the insulin and C-peptide responses to oral glucose were significantly greater than the responses to intravenous glucose (insulin: patients 7983 +/- 1937 (+/- SE) vs 3513 +/- 2188 mU l-1 min, p less than 0.002, control subjects 5505 +/- 1035 vs 1066 +/- 484 mU l-1 min, p less than 0.004; C peptide: patients 440 +/- 80 vs 144 +/- 61 nmol l-1 min, p less than 0.01, control subjects 200 +/- 38 vs 63 +/- 16 nmol l-1 min, P less than 0.01). The incretin effects for insulin (patients 4.4 +/- 1.4, control subjects 7.7 +/- 1.8) and C-peptide (patients 4.4 +/- 0.9, control subjects 3.7 +/- 0.9) and the GIP responses to oral and intravenous glucose were not significantly different between transplant patients and control subjects. As the incretin effect was preserved, despite a denervated pancreas, hormonal rather than neural factors may be more important in mediating increased insulin secretion after oral carbohydrate. The normal GIP response is compatible with its proposed role as an insulinotropic hormone.     

Influence of gastric inhibitory polypeptide on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls

AIM:Gastric inhibitory polypeptide is secreted fromintestinal K-cells in response to nutrient ingestion andacts as an incretin hormone in human physiology.Whileanimal experiments suggested a role for GIP as aninhibitor of gastric secretion,the GIP effects on gastricacid output in humans are still controversial.METHODS:Pentagastrin was administered at an infusionrate of 1 μg.kg~(-1).h~(-1)over 300 min in 8 patients withtype 2 diabetes(2 female,6 male,54 10 years,BMI30.5 2.2 kg/m~2;no history of autonomic neuropathy)and 8 healthy subjects(2/6,46±6 years.,28.9±5.3 kg/m~2).A hyperglycaemic clamp(140 mg/dl)was performedover 240 min.Placebo,GIP at a physiological dose(1pmol.kg~(-1).min~(-1)),and GIP at a pharmacological dose(4 pmol.kg~(-1).min~(-1))were administered over 60 mineach.Boluses of placebo,20 pmol GIP/kg,and 80 pmolGIP/kg were injected intravenously at the beginning ofeach infusion period,respectively.Gastric volume,acidand chloride output were analysed in 15-min intervals.Capillary and venous blood samples were drawn for thedetermination of glucose and total GIP.Statistics werecarried out by repeated-measures ANOVA and one-wayANOVA.RESULTS:Plasma glucose concentrations during thehyperglycaemic clamp experiments were not different between patients with type 2 diabetes and controls.Steady-state GIP plasma levels were 61±8 and 79±12pmol/l during the low-dose and 327±35 and 327±17pmol/l during the high-dose infusion of GIP,in healthycontrol subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes,respectively(P=0.23 and p 0.99).Pentagastrin markedlyincreased gastric acid and chloride secretion(P<0.001).There were no significant differences in the rates ofgastric acid or chloride output between the experimentalperiods with placebo or any dose of GIP.The temporalpatterns of gastric acid and chloride secretion weresimilar in patients with type 2 diabetes and healthycontrols(P=0.86 and P=0.61,respectively).CONCLUSION:Pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acidsecretion is similar in patients with type 2 diabetes andhealthy controls.GIP administration does not influencegastric acid secretion at physiological or pharmacologicalplasma levels.Therefore,GIP appears to act as anincretin rather than as an enterogastrone in humanphysiology.     

Relationship between insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in cirrhosis

Hepatic insulin extraction is difficult to measure in humans; as a result, the interrelationship between defective insulin secretion and insulin insensitivity in the pathogenesis of glucose intolerance in cirrhosis remains unclear. To reassess this we used recombinant human C-peptide to measure C-peptide clearance in cirrhotic patients and controls and thus derive C-peptide and insulin secretion rates after a 75-gm oral glucose load and during a 10 mmol/L hyperglycemic clamp. Cirrhotic patients were confirmed as insulin-insensitive during a euglycemic clamp (glucose requirement: 4.1 +/- 0.1 mg/kg/min vs. 8.1 +/- 0.5 mg/kg/min; p less than 0.001), which also demonstrated a low insulin metabolic clearance rate (p less than 0.001). Although intolerant after oral glucose, the cirrhotic patients had glucose requirements identical to those of controls during the hyperglycemic clamp (cirrhotic patients: 6.1 +/- 1.0 mg/kg/min; controls: 6.3 +/- 0.7 mg/kg/min), suggesting normal intravenous glucose tolerance. C-peptide MCR was identical in cirrhotic patients (2.93 +/- 0.16 ml/min/kg) and controls (2.96 +/- 0.24 ml/min/kg). Insulin secretion was higher in cirrhotic patients, both fasting (2.13 +/- 0.26 U/hr vs. 1.09 +/- 0.10 U/hr; p less than 0.001) and from min 30 to 90 of the hyperglycemic clamp (5.22 +/- 0.70 U/hr vs. 2.85 +/- 0.22 U/hr; p less than 0.001). However, with oral glucose the rise in serum C-peptide concentration was relatively delayed, and the insulin secretion index (secretion/area under 3-hr glucose curve) was not elevated. Hepatic insulin extraction was reduced both in fasting and during the hyperglycemic clamp (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Dissociated effects of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide vs glucagon-like peptide-1 on β-cell secretion and insulin clearance in mice

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) potently augment insulin response to glucose. It is less known what their effects are insulin clearance, which also contributes to peripheral hyperinsulinemia observed after administration of incretins together with glucose. The aims of this study were the quantification of C-peptide secretion and the evaluation of insulin clearance after administration of GIP with glucose. This allows the assessment of GIP's effects on hyperinsulinemia. In addition, GIP's effects were compared with those of GLP-1. Anesthetized female NMRI mice were injected intravenously with glucose alone (1 g/kg, n = 35) or glucose together with GIP (50 μg/kg, n = 12). Samples were taken through the following 50 minutes, and C-peptide and insulin concentrations were used to reconstruct C-peptide secretion rate and insulin clearance. In a previous study, GLP-1 (10 μg/kg) was used in 12 mice; and we used those GLP-1 results to compare GIP effects with those of GLP-1. C-peptide secretion rate peaked at 1 minute after glucose injection, and the immediate part of the insulin-releasing process was markedly augmented by both incretin hormones (1-minute suprabasal increment secretory rate was 20 ± 2 pmol/min for GIP and 28 ± 2 pmol/min for GLP-1, vs only 9 ± 1 pmol/min for glucose alone; P < .001). Until 10 minutes after administration, C-peptide secretion remained higher with incretins (P < .0001), whereas starting from 20 minutes, the 3 patterns were undistinguishable (P > .2). Insulin clearance, previously shown to be abridged by 46% with GLP-1, was reduced only by a nonsignificant (P = .27) 21% with GIP. This study thus shows that the 2 incretins markedly augment glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in mice by a preferential action on the immediate response to glucose of insulin secretion. However, the action of GIP is less effective than that of GLP-1. Insulin clearance with GIP is not significantly reduced. We conclude that GIP is less potent than GLP-1 in inducing glucose-stimulated hyperinsulinemia in the mouse.     

Effect of porcine gastric inhibitory polypeptide on beta-cell function in type I and type II diabetes mellitus

The effect of highly purified natural porcine GIP on C-peptide release was examined in six type I (insulin-dependent) diabetics (IDD) with residual beta-cell function, six type II non-insulin-dependent) diabetics (NIDD), and six normal subjects. All subjects were normal weight. From -120 minutes to 180 minutes glucose or insulin was infused IV to achieve a constant plasma glucose level of 8 mmol/L. On two separate days GIP (2 pmol/kg/min) or isotonic NaCl at random were infused from 0 to 30 minutes. After 10 minutes of GIP infusion plasma IR-GIP concentrations were in the physiologic postprandial range. At 30 minutes a further increase in IR-GIP to supraphysiologic levels occurred. In all subjects plasma, C-peptide increased more after 10 minutes of GIP infusion (IDD, 0.48 +/- 0.05; NIDD, 0.79 +/- 0.11; normal subjects, 2.27 +/- 0.29 nmol/L) than on the corresponding day with NaCl infusion (IDD, 0.35 +/- 0.03; NIDD, 0.62 +/- 0.08; normal subjects, 1.22 +/- 0.13 nmol/L, P less than .05 for all). The responses of the diabetics were significantly lower than that of the normal subjects (P less than .001 for both groups). No further increase in C-peptide occurred during the remaining 20 minutes of the GIP infusion in the diabetic subjects (IDD, 0.49 +/- 0.05; NIDD, 0.83 +/- 0.10 nmol/L). In the presence of a plasma glucose concentration of 8 mmol/L, physiologic concentrations of porcine GIP caused an immediate but impaired beta-cell response in IDD and NIDD patients.     

Dose-dependent efficacy of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 on GIP actions in humans

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) fragment GIP(3-30)NH₂ is a selective, competitive GIP receptor antagonist, and doses of 800 to 1200 pmol/kg/min inhibit GIP-induced potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by >80% in humans. We evaluated the effects of GIP(3-30)NH₂ across a wider dose range in eight healthy men undergoing six separate and randomized 10-mmol/L hyperglycaemic clamps (A–F) with concomitant intravenous infusion of GIP (1.5 pmol/kg/min; A–E) or saline (F). Clamps A to E involved double-blinded, infusions of saline (A) and GIP(3-30)NH₂ at four rates: 2 (B), 20 (C), 200 (D) and 2000 pmol/kg/min (E), respectively. Mean plasma concentrations of glucose (A–F) and GIP (A–E) were similar. GIP-induced potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was reduced by 44 ± 10% and 84 ± 10% during clamps D and E, respectively. Correspondingly, the amounts of glucose required to maintain the clamp during D and E were not different from F. GIP-induced suppression of bone resorption and increase in heart rate were lowered by clamps D and E. In conclusion, GIP(3-30)NH₂ provides extensive, dose-dependent inhibition of the GIP receptor in humans, with most pronounced effects of the doses 200 to 2000 pmol/kg/min within the tested range.     

Dissociated incretin response to oral glucose at 1 year after restrictive vs. malabsorptive bariatric surgery

Aim: Compare the response to oral glucose of the two incretin hormones, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) at 1 year after restrictive vs. malabsorptive bariatric surgery.
Methods: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG, n = 7) or jejunoileal bypass (JIB, n = 5) was performed in 12 women, aged 26–39 years, with severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) 46.6 ± 2.3 kg/m²]. After 1 year, 75 g glucose was administered and plasma levels of glucose, insulin, GIP and GLP-1 were determined regularly during the following 2 h.
Results: At 1 year after operation, reduction in body weight, actual body weight, fasting glucose or insulin, or the glucose and insulin responses to oral glucose did not differ significantly between the groups. Similarly, fasting GIP and GLP-1 levels did not differ significantly between the groups. In contrast, the GIP and GLP-1 responses to oral glucose were different between the groups in a dissociated pattern. Thus, AUC_GIP was significantly higher after VBG than after JIB (53 ± 8 vs. 26 ± 6 pmol/l/min, p = 0.003). In contrast, AUC_GLP−1 was significantly higher after JIB than after VBG (49 ± 5 vs. 20 ± 3 pmol/l/min, p = 0.007).
Conclusions: We conclude that at 1 year after bariatric surgery, the two incretins show dissociated responses in that the GIP secretion is higher after VBG whereas GLP-1 secretion is higher after JIB. This dissociated incretin response is independent from reduction in body weight, glucose tolerance or insulin secretion.     

Compared to glibenclamide, repaglinide treatment results in a more rapid fall in glucose level and beta-cell secretion after glucose stimulation

BACKGROUND: The more rapid onset of action and the shorter half-life of repaglinide may reduce the post-load glucose excursion and limit sustained insulin secretion compared to sulphonylurea (SU) derivatives. METHODS: We studied 12 patients with type 2 diabetes (age 62 +/- 2 years, BMI 28.3 +/- 1.3 kg m(-2), HbA1c 6.7 +/- 0.2%) on SU monotherapy at submaximal dose. Patients were treated for 3 weeks with repaglinide or glibenclamide in a randomized, crossover trial. At the end of each treatment period, patients underwent a 60-min hyperglycaemic clamp (glucose 12 mmol L(-1)) followed by 4-h observation (60-300 min) with frequent blood sampling for determination of glucose, insulin, proinsulin and C-peptide levels. Before the clamp (5 min for repaglinide, 30 min for glibenclamide), patients ingested their usual morning drug dose. RESULTS: After the end of the hyperglycaemic clamp, mean plasma glucose fell to a level of 5 mmol L(-1) after approximately 150 min with repaglinide, and after approximately 190 min with glibenclamide. While initially quite similar, in the period from 240 to 300 min, insulin, proinsulin and C-peptide levels were lower during repaglinide treatment (insulin 133 +/- 20 vs 153 +/- 25 pmol L(-1) (P < 0.05), proinsulin 14 +/- 3 vs 19 +/- 4 pmol L(-1) (P = 0.06) and C-peptide 0.81 +/- 0.19 vs 1.14 +/- 0.18 nmol L(-1) (P = 0.05) for repaglinide vs glibenclamide, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Following glucose stimulation, plasma glucose levels, and insulin concentration decrease more rapidly after repaglinide treatment than after glibenclamide. Proinsulin and C-peptide secretion tended to fall more rapidly as well. These findings are consistent with a more rapid onset and shorter duration of beta-cell stimulation associated with repaglinide.     

Effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 on counterregulatory hormone responses, cognitive functions, and insulin secretion during hyperinsulinemic, stepped hypoglycemic clamp experiments in healthy volunteers

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and analogues are being evaluated as a new therapeutic principle for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. GLP-1 suppresses glucagon secretion, which could lead to disturbances of hypoglycemia counterregulation. This has, however, not been tested. Nine healthy volunteers with normal oral glucose tolerance received infusions of regular insulin (1 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) over 360 min on two occasions in the fasting state. Capillary glucose concentrations were clamped at plateaus of 4.3, 3.7, 3.0, and 2.3 mmol/liter for 90 min each (stepwise hypoglycemic clamp); on one occasion, GLP-1 (1.2 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was administered i.v. (steady-state concentration, approximately 125 pmol/liter); on the other occasion, NaCl was administered as placebo. Glucagon, cortisol, GH (immunoassays), and catecholamines (radioenzymatic assay) were determined, autonomous and neuroglucopenic symptoms were assessed, and cognitive function was tested at each plateau. Insulin secretion rates were estimated by deconvolution (two-compartment model of C-peptide kinetics). At insulin concentrations of approximately 45 mU/liter, glucose infusion rates were similar with and without GLP-1 (P = 0.26). Only during the euglycemic plateau (4.3 mmol/liter), GLP-1 suppressed glucagon concentrations (4.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.5 +/- 0.7 pmol/liter; P = 0.012); at all hypoglycemic plateaus, glucagon increased similarly with GLP-1 or placebo, to maximum values greater than 20 pmol/liter (P = 0.97). The other counterregulatory hormones and autonomic or neuroglucopenic symptom scores increased, and cognitive functions decreased with decreasing glucose concentrations, but there were no significant differences comparing experiments with GLP-1 or placebo, except for a significant reduction of GH responses during hypoglycemia with GLP-1 (P = 0.04). GLP-1 stimulated insulin secretion only at plasma glucose concentrations of at least 4.3 mmol/liter. In conclusion, the suppression of glucagon by GLP-1 does occur at euglycemia, but not at hypoglycemic plasma glucose concentrations (< or = 3.7 mmol/liter). GLP-1 does not impair overall hypoglycemia counterregulation except for a reduction in GH responses, which is in line with other findings demonstrating pituitary actions of GLP-1. Below plasma glucose concentrations of 4.3 mmol/liter, the insulinotropic action of GLP-1 is negligible.     

The pathophysiology of diabetes involves a defective amplification of the late-phase insulin response to glucose by glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide-regardless of etiology and phenotype

The effect of the insulinotropic incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), is preserved in typical middle-aged, obese, insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic patients, whereas a defective amplification of the so-called late-phase plasma insulin response (20-120 min) to glucose by the other incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), is seen in these patients. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate plasma insulin and C-peptide responses to GLP-1 and GIP in five groups of diabetic patients with etiology and phenotype distinct from the obese type 2 diabetic patients. We studied (six in each group): 1) patients with diabetes mellitus secondary to chronic pancreatitis; 2) lean type 2 diabetic patients (body mass index < 25 kg/m(2)); 3) patients with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults; 4) diabetic patients with mutations in the HNF-1alpha gene [maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)3]; and 5) newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. All participants underwent three hyperglycemic clamps (2 h, 15 mM) with continuous infusion of saline, 1 pmol GLP-1 (7-36)amide/kg body weight.min or 4 pmol GIP pmol/kg body weight.min. The early-phase (0-20 min) plasma insulin response tended to be enhanced by both GIP and GLP-1, compared with glucose alone, in all five groups. In contrast, the late-phase (20-120 min) plasma insulin response to GIP was attenuated, compared with the plasma insulin response to GLP-1, in all five groups. Significantly higher glucose infusion rates were required during the late phase of the GLP-1 stimulation, compared with the GIP stimulation. In conclusion, lack of GIP amplification of the late-phase plasma insulin response to glucose seems to be a consequence of diabetes mellitus, characterizing most, if not all, forms of diabetes.     

Secretion of incretin hormones and the insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in women with a history of gestational diabetes

Aims/hypothesis The insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes and around 50% of their first-degree relatives under hyperglycaemic conditions. It is unknown whether this is a result of a specific defect in GIP action or of a general reduction in beta cell function. Moreover, impaired secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) has been described in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we studied the insulinotropic effect of GIP in women with previous gestational diabetes (pGDM) under euglycaemic fasting conditions and during a hyperglycaemic clamp experiment. The secretion of GIP and GLP-1 was assessed following oral glucose ingestion.Materials and methods On separate occasions we performed an OGTT and administered an i.v. bolus of 20 pmol GIP/kg body weight in 20 women with pGDM and 20 control women. An additional hyperglycaemic clamp experiment (140 mg/dl [7.8 mmol/l] over 120 min) with i.v. infusion of GIP (2 pmol kg^–1 min^–1; 30–90 min) was performed in 14 women in each group. Capillary and venous blood samples were drawn for the measurement of glucose (glucose oxidase), insulin, C-peptide, GIP and GLP-1 (specific immunoassays). Indices of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function were calculated. Statistical analyses were carried out using repeated measures ANOVA.Results Following oral glucose ingestion, plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations increased to higher levels in the women with pGDM than in the control women (p<0.05). The women with pGDM were characterised by a higher degree of insulin resistance than the control women (p=0.007 for the Matsuda index), but showed no overt defects in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (p=0.40 for the insulinogenic index following i.v. glucose). The secretion of GLP-1 and GIP was not different between the groups (p=0.87 and p=0.57, respectively). The insulin secretory response to GIP administration was similar in the two groups both after GIP bolus administration and during the hyperglycaemic clamp experiment (p=0.99 and p=0.88, respectively). A hyperbola-like relationship was found between the degree of insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) and the insulin secretory response to GIP and i.v. glucose administration.Conclusions/interpretation These results do not support the hypothesis of an early defect in GIP action as a risk factor for subsequent development of diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes. The inverse relationship between insulin resistance and the insulin secretory response to glucose or GIP suggests that beta cell secretory function in response to different stimuli increases adaptively when insulin sensitivity is diminished.     

New developments in the incretin concept

Summary Experimental and clinical work over the last 6 years has confirmed and broadened, but also challenged, the incretin concept. The nervous component of the entero-insular axis is still poorly defined, especially the peptidergic nerves, of which several contain insulinotropic regulatory peptides. The incretin effect is preserved after complete denervation of the porcine pancreas. Type 2 (non insulin-dependent) diabetic patients have a significantly decreased incretin effect. GIP (gastric inhibitory polypeptide; glucose dependent insulin releasing peptide) remains the strongest incretin factor. Its secretion depends on the absorption of nutrients. However, the correlation between the GIP response and disturbances of the entero-insular axis in some gastrointestinal diseases and, in particular, Type 2 diabetes, is poor. Furthermore, physiological concentrations of exogenous GIP do not produce fully the incretin effect and injection of GIP antibodies does not abolish the incretin effect. This suggests the existence of additional humoral incretin factors. On the other hand, GIP seems to have direct metabolic effects independent of its insulinotropic activity. The incretin effect of oral glucose is smaller if plasma levels of C-peptide rather than insulin are measured. However, decreased hepatic extraction of insulin after glucose ingestion only accounts partially for the incretin effect. GIP is unlikely to be the gut factor which regulates hepatic insulin extraction.     

Lack of insulinotropic effect of endogenous and exogenous cholecystokinin in man

Summary Intraduodenal phenylalanine administration (333 mg/min over 60 min) released endogenous cholecystokinin in healthy young subjects as demonstrated radioimmunologically and by intraduodenal bilirubin and pancreatic enzyme output. Concomitantly, there was only a small increase over basal in circulating immunoreactive-insulin and immunoreactive-C-peptide concentrations. In healthy volunteers intraduodenal infusions of saline (10 ml/min), glucose (333 mg/min) or phenylalanine (333 mg/min) were performed for 60 min when plasma glucose was clamped at approximately 8 mmol/l. Phenylalanine enhanced immunoreactive-insulin and immunoreactive-C-peptide responses three-fold more than did the same amount of glucose. Immuno-reactive gastric inhibitory polypeptide responses were small and not different after glucose and phenylalanine administration. Immunoreactive cholecystokinin was significantly stimulated to 9.4±1.4pmol/l only by intraduodenal phenylalanine. Plasma phenylalanine concentrations increased into the supraphysiological range (approximately 1.5 mmol/l). Intravenous infusions of phenylalanine achieving plasma concentrations of 1.2 mmol/l stimulated insulin secretion at elevated plasma glucose concentrations (approximately 8 mmol/l clamp experiments), but had no effect at basal plasma glucose concentrations. A small increase in cholecystokinin also was observed. Intravenous infusions of synthetic sulphated cholecystokinin-8 leading to plasma concentrations in the upper postprandial range (8–12 pmol/l) did not augment the immunoreactive-insulin or immunoreactive-C-peptide levels during hyperglycaemic clamp experiments, in the absence or presence of elevated plasma phenylalanine concentrations. It is concluded that the augmentation of the glucose-induced insulin release by intraduodenal administration of phenylalanine cannot be related to cholecystokinin release, but rather is explained by the combined effects of elevated glucose and phenylalanine concentrations. In man, cholecystokinin does not augment insulin secretion caused by moderate hyperglycaemia, elevations of phenylalanine concentrations, or combinations thereof.