Totally epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy system implantation in patients with heart failure undergoing CABG

BACKGROUND: Systolic dyssynchrony is present in a considerable number of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Surgical revascularization offers an optimal setting for totally epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) system implantation. AIM: To assess the efficacy of totally epicardial CRT implantation during CABG, in patients with HF. METHODS: Twenty three patients with HF and dyssynchrony underwent totally epicardial CRT system implantation during CABG. This randomised, single-blind, cross-over study compared clinical and echocardiographic parameters during two periods: 3 months of active CRT (CRT+) and 3 months of inactive CRT (CRT-) pacing. RESULTS: Twenty two patients underwent randomisation and completed both study periods. In the CRT+ group more patients improved by two NYHA classes (p=0.028), had a longer 6-minute walk test distance (p=0.047) and better quality of life (p=0.003) compared with the CRT- group. Echocardiography revealed an improved LV ejection fraction (p<0.001), smaller LV end-systolic volume (p=0.04), reduced mitral regurgitation (p=0.026) and improved LV synchrony in the CRT+ group compared with the CRT- group. CONCLUSION: CRT delivered by a totally epicardial system implanted during CABG is associated with additional improvement of clinical and echocardiographic parameters in patients with HF and systolic dyssynchrony.     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS complex.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with narrow QRS complex (<120 ms) and evidence of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony on tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is beneficial in selected heart failure patients with wide QRS complex (> or =120 ms). Patients with narrow QRS complex are currently not eligible for CRT, and the potential effects of CRT are not well studied. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with narrow QRS complex and 33 consecutive patients with wide QRS complex (control group) were prospectively included. All patients needed to have LV dyssynchrony > or =65 ms on TDI, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV heart failure, and LV ejection fraction < or =35%. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, particularly LV dyssynchrony, were comparable between patients with narrow and wide QRS complex (110 +/- 8 ms vs. 175 +/- 22 ms; p = NS). No significant relationship was observed between baseline QRS duration and LV dyssynchrony (r = 0.21; p = NS). The improvement in clinical symptoms and LV reverse remodeling was comparable between patients with narrow and wide QRS complex (mean NYHA functional class reduction 0.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.6 [p = NS] and mean LV end-systolic volume reduction 39 +/- 34 ml vs. 44 +/- 46 ml [p = NS]). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy appears to be beneficial in patients with narrow QRS complex and severe LV dyssynchrony on TDI, with similar improvement in symptoms and comparable LV reverse remodeling to patients with wide QRS complex. The current results need confirmation in larger patient cohorts.     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with end-stage inotrope-dependent class IV heart failure

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in patients with drug-refractory New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV heart failure (HF) and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, CRT efficacy is not well established in patients with more advanced HF on inotropic support. Ten patients (age 55 +/- 13 years) with inotrope-dependent class IV HF (nonischemic [n = 6] and ischemic [n = 4]) received a CRT implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device. QRS duration was 153 +/- 25 ms (left branch bundle block [n = 7], intraventricular conduction delay [n = 2], and QRS <120 ms [n = 1]). The indication for CRT was based on either electrocardiographic criteria (n = 9) or echocardiographic evidence of LV dyssynchrony (n = 1). Intravenous inotropic therapy consisted of dobutamine (n = 6; 4.3 +/- 1.9 microg/kg/min) or milrinone (n = 4; 0.54 +/- 0.19 microg/kg/min) as inpatient (n = 3) or outpatient (n = 7) therapy for 146 +/- 258 days before CRT. One patient required ventilatory support before and during device implantation. All patients were alive at follow-up 1,088 +/- 284 days after CRT. Three patients underwent successful orthotopic cardiac transplantation after 56, 257, and 910 days of CRT. HF improved in 9 patients to NYHA classes II (n = 5) and III (n = 4). Intravenous inotropic therapy was discontinued in 9 of 10 patients after 15 +/- 14 days of CRT. LV volumes decreased (end-diastolic from 226 +/- 78 to 212 +/- 83 ml; p = 0.08; end-systolic from 174 +/- 65 to 150 +/- 78 ml; p <0.01). LV ejection fraction increased (23.5 +/- 4.3% to 32.0 +/- 9.1%; p <0.05). No implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks were recorded, and antitachycardia therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias was delivered in 1 patient. In conclusion, patients with end-stage inotrope-dependent NYHA class IV HF and LV dyssynchrony may respond favorably to CRT with long-term clinical benefit and improved LV function.     

Responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy with narrow or intermediate QRS complexes identified by simple echocardiographic indices of dyssynchrony: the DESIRE study

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recommended for patients with NYHA class III-IV refractory heart failure (HF), ejection fraction <35% and a QRS >120 ms. We attempted to identify responders to CRT from echocardiographic (echo) indices of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with QRS<150 ms. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study enrolled 51 men and 9 women (mean age: 64.5 years) in NYHA class III (n=54) or IV (n=6) presenting with a mean ejection fraction: 25.7%, LV end-diastolic diameter: 69.1 mm, and QRS=121+/-19 ms. All patients were implanted with a CRT system and followed for 1 year. Implantation was preceded and followed by clinical, functional and Doppler (D)-echo evaluation. The primary combined endpoint included 1) death from any cause, 2) HF-related hospitalisations, and 3) NYHA class at 6 months. Before implant, 27 patients had > or =1 echo criterion of mechanical dyssynchrony (DES+ group) and 33 had no evidence of dyssynchrony (DES- group). At 12 months, 8 patients (4 per group) had died, 7 from HF. As regards the primary endpoint at 6 months, 33 patients (55%) had improved, 10 (16%) were unchanged, and 17 (29%) had deteriorated. Clinical improvement was observed in 19 of 27 DES+ (70%), versus 14 of 33 DES- (42%) patients (P<0.04). Baseline QRS duration did not predict response to CRT. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of HF patients with QRS<150 ms, the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony at baseline D-echo examination, but not the QRS width, predicted 6-month clinical response to CRT.     

Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to predict the response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves HF symptoms, exercise capacity, and left ventricular (LV) function. Because not all patients respond, preimplantation identification of responders is needed. In the present study, response to CRT was predicted by the presence of LV dyssynchrony assessed by tissue Doppler imaging. Moreover, the prognostic value of LV dyssynchrony in patients undergoing CRT was assessed. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with end-stage HF, QRS duration >120 ms, and left bundle-branch block were evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging before CRT. At baseline and six months follow-up, New York Heart Association functional class, quality of life and 6-min walking distance, LV volumes, and LV ejection fraction were determined. Events (death, hospitalization for decompensated HF) were obtained during one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Responders (74%) and nonresponders (26%) had comparable baseline characteristics, except for a larger dyssynchrony in responders (87 +/- 49 ms vs. 35 +/- 20 ms, p < 0.01). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that an optimal cutoff value of 65 ms for LV dyssynchrony yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 80% to predict clinical improvement and of 92% to predict LV reverse remodeling. Patients with dyssynchrony >/=65 ms had an excellent prognosis (6% event rate) after CRT as compared with a 50% event rate in patients with dyssynchrony <65 ms (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LV dyssynchrony >/=65 ms respond to CRT and have an excellent prognosis after CRT.     

Triple-Site Versus Standard Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Study (TRUST CRT): Clinical Rationale, Design, and Implementation

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF), lowered LV ejection fraction, and wide QRS. However, many patients (≤40%) do not respond to this form of pacing. TRUST CRT is a prospective, single-center, randomized, single-blind, parallel, and controlled study that has been designed to treat patients with moderate to severe HF (NYHA III-IV), QRS ≥120 ms, sinus rhythm, LV dysfunction (EF ≤ 35%), and signs of mechanical dyssynchrony.
Objective: The primary objective will evaluate the 6-month's combined endpoint of alive status, freedom from hospitalization for HF or heart transplantation, relative ≥10% increase in LV ejection fraction, ≥10% in peak oxygen consumption, and ≥10% in 6-minute walking distance.
Methods: Patients with HF receiving optimal pharmacotherapy, with LV dysfunction, mechanical dyssynchrony, wide QRS and sinus rhythm will be randomized in a 1: 1 fashion to standard or triple-site CRT-D. Patients will be followed for 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months during a blind phase, then every 6 months until study completion. One hundred patients will be enrolled by the study center.
Conclusions: TRUST CRT is a randomized, clinical trial in CRT candidates to evaluate the effectiveness of triple-site pacing versus standard resynchronization in patients with HF.     

Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide in the management of patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in predicting the progression of heart failure (HF) after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: It has been shown that BNP predicts the prognosis and can guide the treatment of HF. METHODS: We studied 50 consecutive patients (61+/-10 years, 23 male) with HF (8 with ischaemic cardiomyopathy), NYHA class III, left bundle branch block, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 91.5 pg/ml had 89% sensitivity, 59% specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of 96% and 33%, respectively, for HF progression after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: HF patients with high BNP values after 1 month of CRT have worse prognosis during follow-up. Therefore, in these patients other therapeutic options should be considered.     

Comparison between Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI) and Tissue Synchronization Imaging (TSI) in Evaluation of Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure

Background: Assessment of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony has an important role in optimizing the selection of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates. We compared a new semiautomatic echocardiographic modality, tissue synchronization imaging (TSI) with a manual method, color-coded tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), in the assessment of LV dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: Ninety-five patients (age = 54.5 ± 17.1 years, 66.3% male) with advanced HF (NYHA functional class ≥III and ejection-fraction ≤35%) were included in the study and evaluated echocardiographically. The time to regional peak systolic velocity (Ts) in six basal and six middle segments of the LV was measured manually using velocity curves from TDI and semiautomatically using TSI and seven parameters of systolic dyssynchrony were computed. Results: Overall, a moderate-to-good association was found between Ts derived by these two modalities, whereas the mean of Ts via TSI was significantly lower than that measured by TDI in many LV segments. The agreement between these two modalities in identifying LV dyssynchrony varied from weak to moderate according to various dyssynchrony indices. In comparison to the TDI-derived dyssynchrony indices, TSI showed a high sensitivity of more than 90% using Ts delay at the basal/all LV segments and the indices for their standard deviations (SD) for identifying LV dyssynchrony, whereas the highest specificity of 80% was achieved using the septal-lateral dyssynchrony index in the prediction of LV dyssynchrony. Conclusion: With the aid of selected LV dyssynchrony indices, the TSI method may confer enough sensitivity for a speedy evaluation and initial screening of LV dyssynchrony in HF patients; however, the current technology of TSI does not seem specific enough to replace TDI in the evaluation of dyssynchrony. (Echocardiography 2012;29:7-12).     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction and symptoms of mild heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in selected patients with moderate to severe heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] classes III to IV). Patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure (NYHA class II) are currently not eligible for CRT and the potential beneficial effects in these patients have not been well studied. Fifty consecutive patients in NYHA class II heart failure and 50 consecutive patients in NYHA classes III to IV (control group) were prospectively included. All patients had left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction120 ms. The effects of CRT in NYHA class II patients were compared with the results obtained in both groups. The severity of baseline LV dyssynchrony (assessed with color-coded tissue Doppler imaging) was comparable between patients in NYHA class II versus those in NYHA classes III to IV (83+/-49 vs 96+/-51 ms, p=NS); resynchronization was achieved in all patients. NYHA class II patients showed a significant improvement in LV ejection fraction (from 25+/-7% to 33+/-10%, p<0.001) and reduction in LV end-systolic volume (from 168+/-55 to 132+/-51 ml, p<0.001) after CRT, similar to patients in NYHA classes III to IV. In addition, only 8% of NYHA class II patients had progression of heart failure symptoms. In conclusion, CRT had comparable effects in patients in NYHA class II and in NYHA classes III to IV heart failure in terms of LV resynchronization, improvement in LV ejection fraction, and LV reverse remodeling.     

Long-term outcome in diabetic heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF) patients. AIMS: To compare functional and structural improvement, as well as long-term outcome, between diabetic and non-diabetic HF patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: We compared response to CRT in 141 diabetic and 214 non-diabetic consecutive patients. Major events were; death from any cause, urgent heart transplantation and implantation of a left ventricular (LV) assist device. Frequencies of hospitalisation and defibrillator (CRT-D) discharges were also analyzed. RESULTS: CRT was able to significantly improve functional capacity, ventricular geometry and neurohumoral imbalance in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients over a median follow-up time of 34 months. Overall event-free survival was similar in diabetic and non-diabetic patients (HR 1.23, p=0.363), as was survival free from CRT-D interventions (HR 1.72; p=0.115) and hospitalisations (HR 1.12; p=0.500). On multivariable analysis, NYHA class IV (p=0.002), low LV ejection fraction (p=0.002), absence of beta-blocker therapy (p<0.001), impaired renal function (p=0.003), presence of an epicardial lead (p=0.025), but not diabetes (p=0.821) were associated with a poor outcome after CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic HF patients treated with CRT had a very favourable functional and survival outcome, which was comparable to non-diabetic patients.     

Benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure patients with narrow QRS complexes and coexisting systolic asynchrony by echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with narrow QRS complexes (<120 ms) and echocardiographic evidence of mechanical asynchrony. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is currently recommended to advanced HF patients with prolonged QRS duration. Echocardiographic assessment of systolic mechanical asynchrony has been proven useful to predict a favorable response after CRT. METHODS: A total of 102 HF patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV were enrolled. Among them, 51 had wide QRS (>120 ms) and 51 had narrow QRS (<120 ms). Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was employed to select patients with systolic asynchrony (increased asynchrony index) in the narrow-QRS group. Clinical and echocardiographic assessments were performed at baseline and 3 months after CRT. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction of left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume in both narrow (122 +/- 42 cc vs. 103 +/- 47 cc, p < 0.001) and wide (148 +/- 74 cc vs. 112 +/- 64 cc, p < 0.001) QRS groups. Improvement of NYHA functional class (both p < 0.001), maximal exercise capacity (both p < 0.05), 6-min hall-walk distance (both p < 0.01), ejection fraction (both p < 0.001), and mitral regurgitation (both p < 0.005) was also observed. In both groups, the degree of baseline mechanical asynchrony determined LV reverse remodeling to a similar extent, as shown by the superimposed regression lines. Withholding CRT for 4 weeks resulted in loss of echocardiographic benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy for HF patients with narrow QRS complexes and coexisting mechanical asynchrony by TDI results in LV reverse remodeling and improvement of clinical status. The amplitude of benefit is similar to the wide-QRS group provided that similar extent of systolic asynchrony is selected.     

Indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy: 2011 update from the Heart Failure Society of America Guideline Committee

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves survival, symptoms, quality of life, exercise capacity, and cardiac structure and function in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or ambulatory class IV heart failure (HF) with wide QRS complex. The totality of evidence supports the use of CRT in patients with less severe HF symptoms. CRT is recommended for patients in sinus rhythm with a widened QRS interval (≥150 ms) not due to right bundle branch block (RBBB) who have severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and persistent NYHA functional class II-III symptoms despite optimal medical therapy (strength of evidence A). CRT may be considered for several other patient groups for whom evidence of benefit is clinically significant but less substantial, including patients with a QRS interval of ≥120 to <150 ms and severe LV systolic dysfunction who have persistent mild to severe HF despite optimal medical therapy (strength of evidence B), some patients with atrial fibrillation, and some with ambulatory class IV HF. Several evidence gaps remain that need to be addressed, including the ideal threshold for QRS duration, QRS morphology, lead placement, degree of myocardial scarring, and the modality for evaluating dyssynchrony. Recommendations will evolve over time as additional data emerge from completed and ongoing clinical trials.     

Predictive parameters of left ventricular reverse remodeling in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with severe congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is useful for the treatment of severe congestive heart failure. Unfortunately up to 30% of patients could be non-responders. The aim of our study was to find parameters to predict responsiveness to CRT. METHODS: Fifteen patients (9 males, 6 females, mean age 67.3 +/- 7.8 years, range 52-83 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy, NYHA functional class III-IV, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction < 35% and QRS > or = 110 ms, underwent CRT. All the patients had echocardiographic evidence of systolic dys-synchrony. RESULTS: One patient died of electromechanical dissociation. The remaining 14 patients maintained biventricular stimulation at 6 months; mean QRS width decreased from 156 to 132 ms (p < 0.001). Ten patients (71%) were considered responders because of a reduction in LV end-systolic volume > 15%. In non-responders (4 patients, 29%) LV end-systolic volume was stable in 3 patients and increased in 1. LV ejection fraction significantly increased only in responders (p < 0.001). Responders had more severe pre-pacing dyssynchrony than non-responders (p < 0.001). Inter- (p = 0.002) and intraventricular dyssynchrony (p = 0.003) did significantly reduce after CRT only in responders. On multiple regression analysis there were two independent predictors of reverse remodeling after pacing: the baseline mitral QS-tricuspid QS (QSm-QSt) time (B = -1.7, p = 0.005) and the intraventricular dyssynchrony index (B = -1.55, p = 0.007). Pre-implant QSm-QSt of 38 ms correctly identified the two groups: responders had a value > 38 ms and non-responders < 38 ms. The pre-implant intraventricular dyssynchrony index of 28 ms was the cut-off value: responders had an index > 28 ms, non-responders < 28 ms. CONCLUSIONS: In the literature a tissue Doppler imaging index of intraventricular dyssynchrony evaluated before implantation is used to select responders to CRT. In our work we studied interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony, and both the QSm-QSt time and the standard deviation of the 12 LV segment QS time were correctly able to identify responders.     

Usefulness of preimplantation B-type natriuretic peptide level for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Nearly 1/3 of patients with heart failure (HF) fail to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of preimplantation brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in predicting the clinical response to CRT. We retrospectively analyzed 164 patients who underwent CRT. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF symptoms despite maximal medical therapy, who were not on inotropic medications, had left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%, and QRS duration >130 ms were included in the study. CRT response in patients who survived at 6-month follow-up was defined as no HF hospitalization and improvement of > or =1 grades in the New York Heart Association classification. BNP assays were performed before implantation and at 6-month follow-up. Patients had ischemic (47%) or nonischemic (53%) cardiopathy. Responders (n = 107) and nonresponders (n = 57) had similar baseline characteristics. Cardiac death and hospitalization for HF occurred in 5 (4.7%) and 18 (31.6%) patients, respectively. CRT responders compared with nonresponders exhibited higher preimplantation BNP levels (800 +/- 823 vs 335 +/- 348 pg/ml, p = 0.0002) and a significant reduction in the QRS duration after implantation (-6 +/- 34 vs +7 +/- 32 ms, p = 0.048). The preimplantation BNP was the only independent predictor of the CRT response (p = 0.001). A BNP value > or =447 pg/ml demonstrated a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 79% in identifying CRT response. In a subgroup of 41 patients who underwent Doppler tissue imaging analysis, the preimplantation BNP was higher in patients presenting with intraventricular dyssynchrony (845 +/- 779 vs 248 +/- 290 pg/ml, p = 0.04). In conclusion, the preimplantation BNP value independently predicts CRT response and was superior to QRS duration reduction in identifying CRT responders.     

腺相关病毒介导心肌肌浆网Ca2+-ATPase 2a基因转导治疗大鼠慢性心力衰竭

目的 研究腺相关病毒为载体的心肌肌浆网Ca^2＋ -ATPase 2a（sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca^2＋ -ATPase,SERCA2a）基因转导对慢性心力衰竭（HF）大鼠的治疗作用,并探讨其多种可能的机理.方法 采用腹主动脉缩窄术建立HF大鼠模型,应用经腹心包腔内注射术分别将生理盐水、携带eGFP基因和携带SERCA2a基因的重组腺相关病毒导入HF、HF＋EGFP和HF＋SERCA2a组大鼠心脏.于导入30天,检测各组大鼠的心脏功能、SERCA2a蛋白表达和活性;比较HF组和HF＋SERCA2a组大鼠心肌蛋白质组表达的差异;检测各组大鼠心肌肌球蛋白重链（MHC）亚型的表达.结果 HF大鼠心脏内转导入SERCA2a基因30天,心脏收缩和舒张功能达到对照组大鼠水平,并且HF＋SERCA2a组左室重/体重比值显著降低;SERCA2a蛋白表达和活性明显升高至对照组大鼠水平;多种能量代谢酶表达明显增加;α-MHC、β-MHC的表达以及α-MHC/β-MHC恢复至对照组大鼠水平.结论 以重组腺相关病毒2作为载体,SERCA2a基因转导可以增强衰竭心脏的SERCA2a功能,增加心脏能量代谢,纠正MHC亚型的异常表达;在临床方面表现为显著改善心脏收缩和舒张功能,可能能够减轻心脏肥厚等病理性结构改变.     

Postero-lateral scar tissue resulting in non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

In large cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials, approximately 20-30% of patients did not respond to CRT. Recent studies indicated that left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony is needed for response to CRT. However, the presence of LV dyssynchrony may not be the only determinant of response, because some patients with LV dyssynchrony do not benefit from CRT. In the current case report, we present a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy, NYHA class III heart failure symptoms, and substantial LV dyssynchrony on tissue Doppler imaging who underwent CRT implantation but did not respond. Following CRT, LV dyssynchrony was not reduced and the patient did not improve in clinical symptoms or LV function. The lack of LV resynchronization was explained by the presence of extensive scar tissue in the region of the tip of the LV pacing lead resulting in ineffective LV pacing. In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and history of previous infarction, assessment of scar tissue should be considered before CRT implantation.     

Intraventricular dyssynchrony predicts mortality and morbidity after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a study using cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue synchronization imaging.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess a novel measure of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, a cardiovascular magnetic resonance-tissue synchronization index (CMR-TSI), in patients with heart failure (HF). A further aim was to determine whether CMR-TSI predicts mortality and major cardiovascular events (MCE) after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: Cardiac dyssynchrony is a predictor of mortality in patients with HF. The unparalleled spatial resolution of CMR may render CMR-TSI a predictor of clinical benefit after CRT. METHODS: In substudy A, CMR-TSI was assessed in 66 patients with HF (age 60.8 +/- 10.8 years, LV ejection fraction 23.9 +/- 12.1% [mean +/- SD]) and 20 age-matched control subjects. In substudy B, CMR-TSI was assessed in relation to clinical events in 77 patients with HF and with a QRS > or =120 ms undergoing CRT. RESULTS: In analysis A, CMR-TSI was higher in patients with HF and a QRS <120 ms (79.5 +/- 31.2 ms, p = 0.0003) and in those with a QRS > or =120 ms (105.9 +/- 55.8 ms, p < 0.0001) than in control subjects (21.2 +/- 8.1 ms). In analysis B, a CMR-TSI > or =110 ms emerged as an independent predictor of the composite end points of death or unplanned hospitalization for MCE (hazard ratio [HR] 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51 to 4.34, p = 0.0002) or death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for HF (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.23 to 4.14, p = 0.0060) as well as death from any cause (HR: 2.6; 95% CI 1.29 to 6.73, p = 0.0061) and cardiovascular death (HR 3.82; 95% CI 1.63 to 16.5, p = 0.0007) over a mean follow-up of 764 days. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial dyssynchrony assessed by CMR-TSI is a powerful independent predictor of mortality and morbidity after CRT.     

Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts right ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to evaluate right ventricular (RV) remodeling after six months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is beneficial in patients with end-stage heart failure. The effect of CRT on RV size is currently unknown. Accordingly, the effects of CRT on RV size, severity of tricuspid regurgitation, and pulmonary artery pressure were evaluated. METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure (52% ischemic cardiomyopathy), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) < or =35%, QRS duration >120 ms, and left bundle branch block were included. Clinical parameters, LV volumes, LVEF, LV dyssynchrony, and RV chamber size were assessed at baseline and after six months of CRT; LV dyssynchrony was assessed using tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS: Clinical parameters improved significantly; LV dyssynchrony was acutely reduced after CRT and remained unchanged at six-month follow-up. Left ventricular EF improved significantly from 19 +/- 6% to 26 +/- 8% (p < 0.001), and LV end-diastolic volume decreased from 257 +/- 98 ml to 227 +/- 86 ml (p < 0.001). Right ventricular annulus decreased significantly from 37 +/- 9 mm to 32 +/- 10 mm, RV short-axis from 29 +/- 11 mm to 26 +/- 7 mm, and RV long-axis from 89 +/- 11 mm to 82 +/- 10 mm (all p < 0.001). Left ventricular and RV reverse remodeling were only observed in patients with substantial LV dyssynchrony at baseline. Finally, significant reductions in severity of tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary artery pressure were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy results in significant reverse LV and RV remodeling after six months of CRT in patients with LV dyssynchrony. Moreover, CRT leads to a reduction of the severity of tricuspid regurgitation and a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure.     

Spectral pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging lateral-to-septal delay fails to predict clinical or echocardiographic outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: The current study sought to assess if pre-implantation lateral-to-septal delay (LSD) > or =60 ms assessed by spectral pulsed-wave myocardial tissue Doppler imaging (PW-TDI) could predict successful long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients (72% males, mean age 59 +/- 10 years) who were referred for CRT according to the ACC/ESC guidelines were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent spectral PW-TDI before and 1 year after CRT. Two left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony time intervals, T(O) and T(P) (time to onset and peak of LV myocardial velocity, respectively), LSD were recorded. Left ventricular dyssynchrony was defined as LSD > or =60 ms. Clinical response was defined as an improvement in >1 NYHA class plus improvement in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) > or =25%, echocardiographic response was defined as a > or =15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LV-ESV). One year after CRT, 50 patients (83%) were clinical responders and 47 patients (78%) were echocardiographic responders. Both T(O) and T(P) LV dyssynchrony indices failed to predict echocardiographic CRT outcome. In addition, there were no significant differences between 'synchronous' and 'dyssynchronous' patient populations at baseline or follow-up in either clinical (NYHA class and 6MWD) or echocardiographic (LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic, and end-systolic) variables. CONCLUSION: The great majority of patients referred for CRT benefit clinically from it. However, spectral PW-TDI failed to predict CRT outcome. When PW-TDI dyssynchrony was applied for selection of proper CRT patients, up to 80-86% of the patients with synchronous LSD that had proven clinical and echocardiographic benefit from CRT would have been denied CRT.