Effects of typical,atypical, and novel antipsychotic drugs on amphetamine-induced place conditioning in rats

Because amphetamine-induced place conditioning is believed to be mediated by dopamine (DA) receptors within the nucleus accumbens, this behavioral model may be useful for detecting drugs with antipsychotic efficacy. To test the selectivity and specificity of the model, the present study examined whether amphetamine-induced place conditioning is reversible in rats pretreated with the classical antipsychotic haloperidol, the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, and the novel antipsychotics raclopride and risperidone. The non-antipsychotic drugs baclofen and prazosin were also tested. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received d-amphetamine (5.4 μmol/kg ip) paired with one side of a two-compartment box and saline paired with the other side. During these pairings, locomotor activity was measured. On the test day, the amount of time drug-free rats spent in each compartment was determined. Rats trained with amphetamine alone showed a significant increase in time spent on the drug-paired side from pre- to postconditioning, indicating a place preference. Pretreatment with the highest dose of either haloperidol (0.026, 0.13, 0.26 μmol/kg sc), clozapine (3, 15, 30, 60 μmol/kg sc), raclopride (0.1, 0.2, 1.0 μmol/kg), or risperidone (0.12, 0.24, 1.2 μmol/kg sc) prior to amphetamine significantly blocked the establishment of place conditioning. Treatment with the antipsychotic alone did not support place conditioning (preference or aversion). On conditioning days, haloperidol, clozapine, raclopride, and risperidone significantly decreased amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. Pretreatment with either baclofen or prazosin failed to disrupt amphetamine-induced place conditioning despite significant decreases in locomotor activity on the conditioning days. These data provide preliminary support for amphetamine place conditioning as a rodent model for detecting drugs with antipsychotic efficacy. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The relationship between dorsolateral prefrontal neuronal N-acetylaspartate and evoked release of striatal dopamine in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia has been linked to abnormal dopamine function, recently to excessive amphetamine-induced release of striatal dopamine, and also to pathology of prefrontal cortical neurons. It has been hypothesized that prefrontal pathology is a primary condition that leads to dopamine dysregulation. We evaluated in vivo the relationship between neuronal integrity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, assessed as N-acetylaspartate (NAA) relative concentrations measured with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and amphetamine-induced release of striatal dopamine, assessed with 11C-raclopride Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in patients with schizophrenia and in healthy subjects. In the patients, NAA measures in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex selectively predicted striatal displacement of 11C-raclopride after amphetamine infusions (rho = -0.76, p < .02). In contrast, NAA measures in other cortical regions and in healthy subjects did not show any correlation. These results support the hypothesis that in schizophrenia neuronal pathology of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is directly related to abnormal subcortical dopamine function.     

Pancreatitis associated with atypical antipsychotics: from the Food and Drug Administration's MedWatch surveillance system and published reports

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative numbers and clinical characteristics of pancreatitis in patients treated with the atypical antipsychotic agents, clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone, versus the conventional neuroleptic, haloperidol. DESIGN: Pharmacovigilance study of pooled, spontaneously reported adverse events. SETTING: Government-affiliated drug evaluation center. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-two patients who developed pancreatitis during treatment with one or more antipsychotic agents. INTERVENTION: Patients were identified with the Food and Drug Administration's MedWatch surveillance program and a MEDLINE search. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Most cases of pancreatitis occurred within 6 months after the start of therapy with one or more antipsychotic agents. Of the reports of pancreatitis occurring in conjunction with these drugs, 40%, 33%, 16%, and 12% were in patients receiving treatment with clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol, respectively. In 50% of the patients receiving haloperidol, an atypical antipsychotic was listed as a concomitant drug. Valproate was administered concomitantly in 23% of patients. Hyperglycemia and acidosis, although uncommon, developed with all the drugs except haloperidol. Twenty-two patients died. In contrast to patients who developed pancreatitis while receiving an atypical antipsychotic, those who developed the disease while receiving haloperidol were women and tended to be older. CONCLUSION: The number of reports involving the three atypical antipsychotic agents and the relative paucity of reports involving haloperidol, despite its more extensive patient exposure, suggest that atypical antipsychotics may precipitate pancreatitis. However, the risk may not be the same with all agents; pancreatitis was reported most frequently with clozapine, followed by olanzapine, and then risperidone. The temporal relationship of the onset of pancreatitis with the start of drug therapy further supports a cause-and-effect relationship.     

Dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in vivo by the novel atypical antipsychotic olanzapine — a123 IBZM single photon emission tomography (SPET) study

We have studied striatal D₂ dopamine binding in schizophrenic patients treated with the novel atypical antipsychotic drug, olanzapine.¹²³I iodobenzamide (IBZM) single photon emission tomography (SPET) was used to estimate striatal dopamine D₂ receptor binding in vivo. Patients were recruited from a prospective, double blind controlled trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol treatment. In vivo striatal D₂ binding data from olanzapine treated patients (n=6) were compared with previously reported data from typical antipsychotic responsive (n=10); clozapine (n=10); and risperidone (n=6) treated patient groups. Mean % Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score (BPRS) improvement following olanzapine treatment was 49% (SD 44). The hypothesis that clinical improvement in olanzapine treated patients would be associated with higher mean striatal D₂ binding of¹²³I IBZM (reflecting lower levels of D₂ occupancy) than typical antipsychotic (1.25±0.05) or risperidone (1.24±0.04) treatment was confirmed. Olanzapine treated patients had similar levels of striatal D₂ binding in vivo (1.41±0.06) as those treated with clozapine (1.49±0.04). This preliminary evidence suggests olanzapine is another atypical antipsychotic drug in which therapeutic response is not associated with a high degree of striatal D₂ receptor occupancy in vivo.     

Striatal volume changes in the rat following long-term administration of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs.

Striatal enlargement has been consistently reported in schizophrenics receiving chronic neuroleptic treatment although the results following atypical antipsychotic treatment have been equivocal. In order to disentangle patient illness from a possible drug effect on brain structure, young adult rats were administered either haloperidol, risperidone, clozapine, olanzapine, or vehicle daily for four or eight months via drinking water. Significant increases in caudate-putamen volumes were seen in animals receiving either haloperidol or clozapine when compared with control animals following eight months of drug administration. Conversely, olanzapine-treated animals showed significant decreases in caudate-putamen volumes when compared with control animals after eight months of drug. Thus, converging evidence indicates that the neuroplastic response of the striatum following neuroleptic exposure causes volumetric increases, whereas atypical antipsychotics affect the basal ganglia differentially. The current data suggests that such differential responses may be due to both the pharmacological properties and the relative doses of the atypical agents.     

Striatal and temporal cortical D2/D3 receptor occupancy by olanzapine and sertindole in vivo: a [123I]epidepride single photon emission tomography (SPET) study

RATIONALE: Previous work suggests clozapine preferentially targets limbic cortical dopamine systems, which could help account for its lack of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) and superior therapeutic efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that olanzapine, a novel atypical antipsychotic drug, occupies temporal cortical D2/D3 receptors to a greater extent than striatal D2/D3 receptors in vivo. METHODS: Nine schizophrenic patients taking either olanzapine [(n=5; mean (SD) age: 32.5 (6.5) years; daily dose: 18.3 (2.6) mg] or sertindole [(n=4; mean (SD) age: 30.3 (7.4) years; daily dose: 16 (5.6) mg] were studied with [123I]epidepride ((S)-N-[(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl]-5-iodo-2,3-dimethoxybenz amide) and single photon emission tomography (SPET). An estimate of [123I]epidepride 'specific binding' to D2/D3 receptors was obtained in patients and age-matched healthy volunteers. A summary measure was generated representing striatal and temporal cortical relative %D2/D3 receptor occupancy by antipsychotic drugs. Occupancy data were compared with previously studied groups of patients receiving typical antipsychotic drugs (n=12) and clozapine (n=10). RESULTS: Mean striatal and temporal cortical %D2/D3 receptor occupancy in olanzapine-treated patients was 41.3% (SD 17.9) and 82.8% (SD 4.2), respectively. Unexpectedly low levels of striatal relative %D2/D3 receptor occupancy were seen in two patients with typical antipsychotic-drug-induced movement disorder prior to switching to olanzapine. In the temporal cortex, mean D2/D3 dopamine receptor occupancy levels above 80% were seen for all antipsychotic drugs studied. CONCLUSIONS: The atypical antipsychotic drugs olanzapine and sertindole, in common with clozapine, demonstrate higher occupancy of temporal cortical than striatal D2/D3 dopamine receptors in vivo at clinically useful doses. This could help mediate their atypical clinical profile of therapeutic efficacy with few extrapyramidal side effects. Limbic selective blockade of D2/D3 dopamine receptors could be a common action of atypical antipsychotic drugs.     

Dopamine D2 receptor blockade in vivo with the novel antipsychotics risperidone and remoxipride — an123I-IBZM single photon emission tomography (SPET) study

Risperidone and remoxipride are recently introduced atypical antipsychotics, with clinical efficacy comparable to that of classical antipsychotics but lower propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). It is unclear whether these properties relate to weak dopamine D₂ receptor blockade in vivo, as has been suggested for the archetypal atypical antipsychotic clozapine. We have used¹²³I-IBZM single photon emission tomography (SPET) to characterize the patterns of striatal D₂ receptor binding in vivo in DSMIII-R-diagnosed schizophrenic and schizo-affective patients treated with either risperidone (n=6) or remoxipride (n=4) but predominantly EPS free. These groups were compared to age- and BPRS- matched subjects from a previously reported D₂ receptor binding database of patients treated with clozapine (n=10) and classical antipsychotics (n=10). Patients on risperidone and remoxipride had high levels of D₂ receptor blockade, comparable to those of patients on classical antipsychotics, and significantly greater than those obtained with clozapine-treated patients (risperidone versus clozapine,P<0.005; remoxipride versus clozapine,P<0.025). These results suggest high levels of striatal D₂ receptor occupancy in association with remoxipride and risperidone treatment and argue against modest D₂ antagonism as the explanation for the low incidence of EPS associated with these drugs.     

The effect of olanzapine treatment on m-chlorophenylpiperazine-induced hormone release in schizophrenia.

In addition to dopamine, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) has been reported to play an important role in schizophrenia. Besides blocking dopamine, atypical antipsychotics also block 5-HT receptors. The clinical efficacy of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine is associated with the 5-HT antagonistic action of the drug and a high serotonergic tone before treatment. The atypical antipsychotic olanzapine has a receptor-binding profile similar to that of clozapine. The present study investigated whether treatment with olanzapine blocks hormone release induced by the 5-HT2c agonist m-chlorophenylpiperazine (m-CPP) and, if so, whether this 5-HT antagonistic effect is related to treatment response. Eighteen male schizophrenic patients participated in this study. All patients were challenged with m-CPP (0.5 mg/kg orally) in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design after a drug-free period of at least 2 weeks. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, and prolactin plasma levels were measured every 30 minutes up to 210 minutes after challenge. Patients were treated for 6 weeks with 10 mg olanzapine daily in an open design, after which the challenge tests were repeated. Olanzapine significantly blocked m-CPP-induced ACTH, cortisol, and prolactin release, suggesting that it is a potent 5-HT2c antagonist in vivo. This 5-HT antagonistic effect of olanzapine was not significantly correlated with treatment response. Also, no significant correlation was found between m-CPP-induced hormone release before treatment and clinical response after treatment with olanzapine. These findings suggest that olanzapine is a potent 5-HT2c antagonist in vivo but that this is unrelated to its clinical efficacy in this nonrefractory sample of schizophrenic patients.     

Effects of risperidone on the peripheral noradrenegic system in patients with schizophrenia: a comparison with clozapine and placebo.

Risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic drug that increases plasma norepinephrine (NE) levels, but the mechanism behind this effect is unclear. We measured arterial plasma levels of NE and other catechols during intravenous infusion of tritium-labeled NE (3H-NE) in risperidone-treated patients and compared their data with those from patients treated with clozapine or placebo. NE levels in risperidone patients were significantly higher than in placebo patients, but lower than in clozapine patients. Neither drug, however, had significant effect on plasma levels of the main neuronal metabolite of NE, dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), suggesting that adrenoceptors blockade alone would not explain the NE findings. The rate of release of endogenous NE into the bloodstream (spillover) was elevated in both risperidone and clozapine patients in a manner that paralleled their NE levels; the NE clearance in both groups did not differ from placebo. Following 3H-NE infusion in risperidone-treated individuals, production of 3H-DHPG was normal, as it was in the clozapine group, suggesting that risperidone does not impede neuronal uptake or intraneuronal metabolism of NE by monoamine oxidase. Our data suggest that both risperidone and clozapine elevate plasma NE levels via enhanced neurotransmitter spillover, with risperidone producing a smaller effect.     

Mechanisms of Action of Antipsychotic Drugs of Different Classes,Refractoriness to Therapeutic Effects of Classical Neuroleptics,and Individual Variation in Sensitivity to their Actions: PART I

Many issues remain unresolved about antipsychotic drugs. Their therapeutic potency scales with affinity for dopamine D2 receptors, but there are indications that they act indirectly, with dopamine D1 receptors (and others) as possible ultimate targets. Classical neuroleptic drugs disinhibit striatal cholinergic interneurones and increase acetyl choline release. Their effects may then depend on stimulation of muscarinic receptors on principle striatal neurones (M4 receptors, with reduction of cAMP formation, for therapeutic effects; M1 receptors for motor side effects). Many psychotic patients do not benefit from neuroleptic drugs, or develop resistance to them during prolonged treatment, but respond well to clozapine. For patients who do respond, there is a wide (>ten-fold) range in optimal doses. Refractoriness or low sensitivity to antipsychotic effects (and other pathologies) could then arise from low density of cholinergic interneurones. Clozapine probably owes its special actions to direct stimulation of M4 receptors, a mechanism available when indirect action is lost.Key Words: Antipsychotic drugs, neuroleptic drugs, cholinergic interneurones, D1 receptors, D2 receptors, muscarinic M1 receptors, muscarinic M4 receptors, neuroleptic threshold, atypical antipsychotic agents.     

Evaluation of N-desmethylclozapine as a potential antipsychotic--preclinical studies.

There is growing interest in N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC), the major metabolite of clozapine, as a unique antipsychotic because it acts in vitro as a 5-HT(2) antagonist and as a partial agonist to dopamine D(2) and muscarinic receptors. To explore this, we compared NDMC to a typical (haloperidol), atypical (clozapine), and partial-agonist atypical (aripiprazole) antipsychotic in preclinical models. The comparison was carried out using: brain D(2) and 5-HT(2) receptor occupancy; animal models predictive of antipsychotic efficacy (amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion (AIL) and conditioned avoidance response (CAR) models); measures predictive of side effects (catalepsy and prolactin elevation); and molecular markers predictive of antipsychotic action (striatal Fos induction). NDMC (10-60 mg/kg/s.c.) showed high 5-HT(2) (64-79%), but minimal D(2) occupancy (<15% at 60 mg/kg) 1 h after administration. In contrast to other antipsychotics, NDMC was not very effective in reducing AIL or CAR and showed minimal induction of Fos in the nucleus accumbens. However, like atypical antipsychotics, it showed no catalepsy, prolactin elevation, and minimal Fos in the dorsolateral striatum. It seems unlikely that NDMC would show efficacy as a stand-alone antipsychotic, however, its freedom from catalepsy and prolactin elevation, and its unique pharmacological profile (muscarinic agonism) may make it feasible to use this drug as an adjunctive treatment to existing antipsychotic regimens.     

Aripiprazole, a novel atypical antipsychotic drug

Before the 1990s, treatment of psychoses centered on conventional agents whose tolerability was limited by extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). The past decade has seen the emergence of a newer generation of antipsychotic agents, first with clozapine and followed shortly by risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone. These agents have been touted as providing better negative symptom efficacy, less impaired cognition, and lower risk of extrapyramidal syndromes. However, evolving evidence suggests that several drugs in this class may be associated with significant weight gain and lipid abnormalities. Aripiprazole, a new atypical antipsychotic drug, displayed efficacy similar to that of haloperidol and risperidone and superior to that of placebo in numerous clinical trials. Aripiprazole does not cause significant prolactin elevation and is associated with a low rate of clinically significant weight gain compared with other atypical antipsychotics. Patients receiving aripiprazole experienced EPS at a rate similar to that seen with placebo. Aripiprazole provides a new treatment option with limited adverse effects for patients in need of antipsychotic therapy.     

Optimizing limbic selective D2/D3 receptor occupancy by risperidone: a [123I]-epidepride SPET study

Selective action at limbic cortical dopamine D2-like receptors is a putative mechanism of atypical antipsychotic efficacy with few extrapyramidal side effects. Although risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic with high affinity for D2 receptors, low-dose risperidone treatment is effective without inducing extrapyramidal symptoms. The objective was to test the hypothesis that treatment with low-dose risperidone results in 'limbic selective' D2/D3 receptor blockade in vivo. Dynamic single photon emission tomography (SPET) sequences were obtained over 5 hours after injection of [123I]-epidepride (approximately 150 MBq), using a high-resolution triple-headed brain scanner (Marconi Prism 3000XP). Kinetic modelling was performed using the simplified reference region model to obtain binding potential values. Estimates of receptor occupancy were made relative to a normal volunteer control group (n = 5). Six patients treated with low-dose risperidone (mean = 2.6 mg) showed moderate levels of D2/D3 occupancy in striatum (49.9%), but higher levels of D2/D3 occupancy in thalamus (70.8%) and temporal cortex (75.2%). Occupancy values in striatum were significantly different from thalamus (F (1,4) = 26.3, p < 0.01) and from temporal cortex (F (1,4) = 53.4, p < 0.01). This is the first study to evaluate striatal and extrastriatal occupancy of risperidone. Low dose treatment with risperidone achieves a similar selectivity of limbic cortical over striatal D2/D3 receptor blockade to that of atypical antipsychotics with lower D2/D3 affinity such as clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine. This finding is consistent with the relevance of 'limbic selective' D2/D3 receptor occupancy to the therapeutic efficacy of atypical antipsychotic drugs.     

Atypical antipsychotics: pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacological interactions

The development of new "atypical" antipsychotic agents, which are safer than classical neuroleptics and also active against the negative symptoms and neurocognitive deficits caused by the illness, has produced a significant advancement in the treatment of schizophrenia. The atypical (or "second generation") antipsychotics have several therapeutical properties in common, however they can significantly differ with regard to clinical potency and side effects. The main features regarding pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological interactions of the most important atypical antipsychotics, namely clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone, are treated herein. Several analytical methods available for the therapeutic drug monitoring of these drugs are also presented, as well as the novel formulations, which can notably improve the therapy of schizophrenia. Other very recent atypical agents, such as ziprasidone, aripiprazole, iloperidone, sertindole and zotepine will also be briefly described.     

Activation of midline thalamic nuclei by antipsychotic drugs

The thalamus has been proposed as a site which may be involved in the production of the syndrome of schizophrenia and the response of schizophrenic symptoms to treatment. These studies test whether, consistent with this hypothesis, the activation of thalamic nuclei is a shared property of neuroleptic antipsychotic drugs. Rats were given single doses of the typical high and low potency neuroleptics haloperidol (1 mg/kg) and chlorpromazine (20 mg/kg), the atypical neuroleptics thiroridazine (20 mg/kg) and clozapine (20 mg/kg), the specific dopamine antagonist raclopride (3 mg/kg), the mixed dopamine/serotonin antagonist risperidone (3 mg/kg) or drug-free vehicle. Increased expression of Fos-like protein was utilized as a marker of cellular activation. All drugs tested, including typical and atypical antipsychotic agents, led to similar effects on the midline thalamic paraventricular, centromedian and rhomboid nuclei and the nucleus reuniens. These results suggest that midline thalamic nuclei may participate in neural circuits mediating some of the shared effects of antipsychotic drugs. Received: 9 January 1997/Final verion: 13 June 1997     

Biochemical and behavioural properties of clozapine

The selection and early development of clozapine was based upon its gross behavioural, arousal-inhibiting, sleep-promoting, and caudate spindle-prolonging properties. Compared to classical neuroleptics, clozapine causes only a short-lasting elevation of plasma prolactin levels, elevates both striatal homovanillic acid and dopamine content, is devoid of marked apomorphine-inhibitory or cataleptogenic activity and fails to induce supersensitivity of striatal dopaminergic systems after chronic administration. Clozapine's intrinsic anticholinergic activity, while stronger than that of other neuroleptic agents, does not appear to underlie either its failure to induce tardive dyskinesias or its superior antipsychotic activity. Furthermore, the overlap between clozapine and several classical neuroleptics with regard to alpha-adrenergic-, serotonin- and histamine-blocking activity makes it unlikely that one or more of these properties is the key to its atypical characteristics. More recent findings show that clozapine and classical neuroleptics differ with regard to their indirect effects on nigral GABA-ergic mechanisms implicated in the induction of tardive dyskinesias and, possibly in keeping with this, that clozapine and similar agents exhibit preferential blockade of D-1 dopamine receptors in the whole animal. Such an action of clozapine in man could well explain both its low EPS liability and, in some subjects, its superior antipsychotic activity.     

Sertindole and dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in comparison to risperidone, clozapine and haloperidol – a 123I-IBZM SPECT study

The striatal D₂ dopamine binding was studied in schizophrenic patients treated with the novel atypical antipsychotic drug sertindole (n = 10). Comparisons were obtained with haloperidol (n = 8), clozapine (n = 6), risperidone (n = 11) and untreated healthy controls (n = 8) of a dataset which has partly been reported previously. ¹²³I-Iodobenzamide (IBZM) single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) was used for estimation of striatal dopamine D₂ receptor binding. Sertindole-treated patients exhibited significantly (P < 0.001) lower levels of striatal D₂ binding (BG/FC ratio:1.28) compared with those treated with haloperidol (BG/FC ratio:1.09) and risperidone (8 mg:1.18) but significantly (P < 0.005) higher levels compared with clozapine (BG/FC ratio:1.49). However, if patients were pretreated with a depot neuroleptic, significantly (P < 0.05) higher striatal D₂ binding (BG/FC ratio:1.12) has been obtained. Since sertindole has been shown to exert distinct clinical efficacy for treatment of positive and negative symptoms, our data are indicative that antipsychotic efficacy is not associated with a high degree of striatal D₂ receptor occupancy in schizophrenic patients. Received: 21 July 1997/Final version: 27 October 1997     

Augmenting antipsychotic treatment with lamotrigine or topiramate in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a naturalistic case-series outcome study.

The glutamate hyperfunction hypothesis of schizophrenia has been proposed largely on the basis of studies in post-mortem brain and the lack of efficacy of glutamate agonists as antipsychotic drugs. Recent reports have also suggested that the addition of lamotrigine, a glutamate excess release inhibitor, can cause a dramatic improvement in clozapine treatment-resistant patients, as well as attenuate the neuropsychiatric effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers. To explore the glutamate hyperfunction hypothesis, patients with schizophrenia who were treatment-resistant to current antipsychotic medications were augmented with either lamotrigine (n = 17) or topiramate (a glutamate kainate/alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolaproprionate antagonist that potentiates GABA function) (n = 9) for 24 weeks. Patients receiving lamotrigine augmentation of clozapine had a significant decrease in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score after 2 weeks of treatment. There was no significant improvement when lamotrigine was added to risperidone, haloperidol, olanzapine or fluphenthixol. There was also no significant improvement observed with topiramate augmentation of clozapine, olanzapine, haloperidol and fluphenthixol. These preliminary data support previous evidence that lamotrigine is an effective augmentation agent for clozapine. Although limited by sample size, the findings also suggest glutamate hyperfunction in schizophrenia may have a presynaptic basis and that atypicals with low dopamine receptor occupancy may have antagonistic actions on glutamate function which confer additional antipsychotic activity.     

Neuroendocrine serotonergic and dopaminergic responsivity in male schizophrenic patients during treatment with neuroleptics and after switch to risperidone

RATIONALE: The pharmacological profile of risperidone is that of an atypical neuroleptic regarding its serotonin 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptor blocking properties. Treatment with risperidone, though, results in considerably elevated plasma prolactin (PRL) levels which are not observed with other atypical neuroleptics, such as clozapine, indicating a differentiated action on receptors that are involved in PRL release, mainly dopaminergic and serotonergic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the responsivity of serotonergic and dopaminergic receptors during treatment with neuroleptics and after switch to risperidone, using neuroendocrine paradigms. METHODS: Two neuroendocrine challenge tests, measuring the PRL increases induced by acute administration of serotonergic (clomipramine, 25 mg i.v.) and dopaminergic (haloperidol, 5 mg i.m.) drugs were performed in 13 male schizophrenic patients during treatment with typical neuroleptics and, later, after 6 weeks of treatment with risperidone. The tests were also performed in a group of nine healthy male volunteers. PRL was estimated in blood samples taken every 15 min for 1 h for clomipramine and every 30 min for 2 h for haloperidol. Psychopathology was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). RESULTS: During treatment with neuroleptics (mean dose 1354 mg chlorpromazine equivalents, range 300-2400 mg), i.m. haloperidol caused significant elevations in plasma PRL, which were totally abolished after 6 weeks treatment with risperidone (mean dose 12.1 mg/day, range 8-16 mg/day), indicating complete D2 receptor blockade. In contrast, the PRL increases obtained after clomipramine administration during neuroleptic treatment were preserved after treatment with risperidone. Both PRL response patterns to clomipramine were similar to that of healthy controls. BPRS score was 50.2+/-9.3 points during neuroleptic treatment and was reduced after risperidone to 30.1+/-6.6 points, i.e., 40% in the mean. CONCLUSIONS: During treatment with typical neuroleptics, the PRL responses to clomipramine are normal, and they are preserved after switch to risperidone in doses that cause complete dopamine receptor blockade. Risperidone, a dopamine and 5-HT receptor blocker, does not affect 5-HT receptors that are involved in the PRL release by the 5-HT uptake blocker clomipramine, indicating a different behavior than other atypical neuroleptics such as clozapine or olanzapine, for which a reduction of the PRL release induced by serotonergic agents like fenfluramine or mCPP has been reported. A conclusive identification of the 5-HT receptor subtypes that are involved in this different action cannot be identified at present, but it should be taken into account that risperidone differs from clozapine, showing higher affinity for 5-HT2A than 5-HT2C receptors and lacking the marked affinity of clozapine to 5-HT1A receptors.