The impact of a cardioprotective protocol on the incidence of cardiac complications after aortic abdominal surgery

We analyzed a local database including 468 consecutive patients who underwent elective aortic abdominal surgery over an 8-yr period in a single institution. A new cardioprotective perioperative protocol was introduced in January 1997, and we questioned whether perioperative cardiac outcome could be favorably influenced by the application of a stepwise cardiovascular evaluation based on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and by the use of antiadrenergic drugs. Clonidine was administered during surgery, and beta-blockers were titrated after surgery to achieve heart rates less than 80 bpm. We compared data of two consecutive 4-yr periods (1993-1996 [control period] versus 1997-2000 [intervention period]). Implementation of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines was associated with increased preoperative myocardial scanning (44.3% vs 20.6%; P < 0.05) and coronary revascularization (7.7% vs 0.8%; P < 0.05). During the intervention period, there was a significant decrease in the incidence of cardiac complications (from 11.3% to 4.5%) and an increase in event-free survival at 1 yr after surgery (from 91.3% to 98.2%). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the combined administration of clonidine and beta-blockers was associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.8), whereas major bleeding, renal insufficiency, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were predictive of cardiac complications. In conclusion, cardiac testing was helpful to identify a small subset of high-risk patients who might benefit from coronary revascularization. Sequential and selective antiadrenergic treatments were associated with improved postoperative cardiac outcome. IMPLICATIONS: Implementation of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and use of antiadrenergic drugs were associated with better cardiac outcomes after major vascular surgery.     

Limitations in the cardiac risk reduction provided by coronary revascularization prior to elective vascular surgery

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the proposed cardiac protective effect of previous coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]) before elective major arterial surgery. METHOD: Preoperative cardiac risk stratification using American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines was done on 425 consecutive patients undergoing 481 elective major vascular operations at an academic VA Medical Center. The algorithm assumed asymptomatic patients with prior coronary revascularization (CABG, <5 year; PTCA, <2 year) were low cardiac risk. Coronary angiography was done for recurrent symptoms with secondary intervention when appropriate. Outcomes (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, cardiac death, and mortality) within 30 days of vascular surgery were compared between patients with and without previous CABG or PTCA by contingency table and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Coronary revascularization was classified as recent (CABG, <1 year; PTCA, <6 months) in 35 cases (7%), prior (1 year < or = CABG < 5 year, 6 months < or = PTCA < 2 year) in 45 cases (9%), and remote (CABG, > or = 5 year; PTCA, > or = 2 year) in 48 cases (10%). A larger fraction of patients with previous revascularization possessed pathologic cardiac risk variables and were stratified as high-risk preoperatively than their nonrevascularized counterparts. Outcomes in patients with previous PTCA were similar to those after CABG (P =.7). Significant differences in adverse cardiac events (P =.01) and mortality (P =.05) were found between patients with CABG done within 5 years or PTCA within 2 years (6.3%, 1.3%, respectively), individuals with remote revascularization (10.4%, 6.3%), and nonrevascularized patients stratified at high risk (13.3%, 3.3%) or intermediate/low (2.8%, 0.9%) risk. De novo or recurrent 3-vessel coronary disease by angiography, but not the presence or timing of previous revascularization, was an independent predictor of cardiac events after vascular operations, whereas remote revascularization was associated with fatal outcomes by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Previous coronary revascularization (CABG, <5 years; PTCA, <2 years) may provide only modest protection against adverse cardiac events and mortality following major arterial reconstruction.     

Long-term survival after vascular surgery: specific influence of cardiac factors and implications for preoperative evaluation

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify specific determinants of long-term cardiac events and survival in patients undergoing major arterial operations after preoperative cardiac risk stratification by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. A secondary goal was to define the potential long-term protective effect of previous coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) in patients with vascular disease. METHODS: Four hundred fifty-nine patients underwent risk stratification (high, intermediate, low) before 534 consecutive elective or urgent (<24 hours after presentation) open cerebrovascular, aortic, or lower limb reconstruction procedures between August 1996 and January 2000. Long-term follow-up (mean, 56 +/- 14 months) was possible in 97% of patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival data. Long-term prognostic variables were identified with the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and contingency table analysis censoring early (<30 days) perioperative deaths. RESULTS: While 5-year survival was 72% for the overall cohort, cardiac causes accounted for only 24% of all deaths, and new cardiac events (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, unstable angina, new coronary angiography, new CABG or PCI, cardiac death) affected only 4.6% of patients per year during follow-up. High cardiac risk stratification level (hazards ratio [HR], 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.4), adverse perioperative cardiac events (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia; HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.1), and age (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6) were independently prognostic for latemortality. Preoperative cardiac risk levels also correlated with new cardiac event rates ( P < .01) and late cardiac mortality ( P = .02). Modestly improved survival in patients who had undergone CABG or PCI less than 5 years before vascular operations compared with those who had undergone revascularization 5 or more years previously and those at high risk without previous coronary intervention (73% vs 58% vs 62% 5-year survival; P = .02) could be demonstrated with univariate testing, but not with multivariate analysis. Type of operation, urgency, noncardiac complications, and presence of diabetes did not affect long-term survival. CONCLUSION: Despite cardiac events being a less common cause of late mortality after vascular surgery, perioperative cardiac factors (age, preoperative risk level, early cardiac complications) are the primary determinants of patient longevity. Patients undergoing more recent (<5 years) CABG or PCI before vascular surgery do not have an obvious survival advantage compared with patients at high cardiac risk without previous coronary interventions.     

Avoidance of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Improves Early Survival in Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Patients with Poor Ventricular Function

Abstract Background: Patients with diminished ventricular function represent an increasing percentage of candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We have reviewed our recent experience in CABG in patients with ejection fractions (EF) 相似文献   

Cardiac risk stratification in patients undergoing endoluminal graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a single-institution experience with 365 patients

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair have a high incidence of coexisting cardiac disease. The traditional cardiac risk stratification for open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery may not apply to patients undergoing endoluminal graft exclusion. The purpose of this study was to examine predictive risk factors for perioperative cardiac events. METHODS: As part of multiple prospective endograft trials approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, data for 365 patients who underwent endoluminal graft repair from 1996 to 2001 were collected. Variables included for analysis were age and sex; history of smoking; presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or renal insufficiency; Eagle clinical cardiac risk factors; American Society of Anesthesiologists index; type of anesthesia administered; estimated blood loss; preoperative hemoglobin level; preoperative use of beta-blocker therapy; duration of surgery; need for iliac artery conduit; and concomitant other vascular procedures. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine which variables were predictive of an adverse perioperative cardiac event, eg, Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), severe arrhythmia, and unstable angina. RESULTS: The study cohort included 322 men and 43 women (mean age, 74.2 years). Fifty-two (14.2%) postoperative cardiac events occurred: severe dysrhythmia in 15 patients (4.1%), MI in 14 patients (3.8%), non-Q wave MI in 8 patients (2.2%), CHF in 8 patients (2.2%), and unstable angina in 7 patients (1.9%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age 70 years or older (P =.034), history of MI (P =.018), angina (P =.004), history of CHF (P <.001), two or more Eagle risk factors (P <.001), and lack of use of preoperative beta-blocker therapy (P =.005) were predictors of perioperative cardiac events. Multivariate analysis identified only age 70 years or older (P =.026), history of MI (P =.024) or CHF (P =.001), and lack of use of preoperative beta-blocker therapy (P =.007) as independent risk factors for an adverse cardiac event. CONCLUSIONS: Age 70 years or older, history of MI or CHF, and lack of use of preoperative beta-blocker therapy are independent risk factors for perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing endoluminal graft repair.     

Cost implications of more widespread carotid artery stenting consistent with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline

The recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline recommended carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic patients. This and the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) form the basis for seeking more liberalized indications and reimbursement for CAS. For the years 2005-2007, >130,000 carotid interventions/year were performed, 88.6% of which were CEAs and 11.4% were CAS. For the same years, each CAS procedure had on average $12,000-$13,500 more expensive mean total hospital charges than each CEA. If the percentages of CAS and CEA had been equal (ie, 50% CAS and 50% CEA), this would translate into an additional $2,000,000,000 in charges for these 3 years. It seems unreasonable to approve enhanced reimbursement for CAS at this time, especially since the large incremental costs would go to support CAS procedures that are inferior in most symptomatic patients and possibly unnecessary in most asymptomatic patients.     

Guidelines for perioperative cardiac evaluation from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force are effective for stratifying cardiac risk before aortic surgery

PURPOSE: We assessed whether the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) task force guidelines for perioperative cardiac evaluation could reliably stratify cardiac risk before aortic surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively applied the guidelines to a closed database, set up prospectively. The setting was a referral center in an institutional practice with hospitalized patients. The closed database included 133 patients who had a routine cardiac examination, which comprised an estimation of functional capacity and noninvasive testing, before aortic surgery. This cardiac evaluation led to the proposal of coronarography in 23 patients and to treating an underlying coronary artery disease in 21 patients (including three myocardial revascularizations). One patient died after myocardial revascularization, and two patients died of cardiac causes after aortic surgery. The algorithm of the ACC/AHA guidelines was applied independently by two investigators to each patient's file that was included in the existing database. The main outcome measure was a comparison between cardiac risk stratification with the ACC/AHA guidelines and the results of the routine cardiac evaluation. RESULTS: The ACC/AHA guidelines were successfully applied to all 133 files by the two investigators. After applying the algorithm, 73 patients were stratified as low cardiac risk, and 60 patients were stratified as high risk. The 21 patients who had undergone a preoperative coronary artery disease optimization were stratified as high risk by means of the ACC/AHA guidelines. The patients who died from cardiac causes were stratified as high risk by means of the ACC/AHA guidelines, whereas none of the patients stratified as low risk died during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The ACC/AHA guidelines were effective in stratifying cardiac risk by using clinical predictors and an estimate of the physical capacity of the patient. Their use may allow a reduction in unnecessary noninvasive testing in patients stratified as being at low risk, while permitting the selection of all patients likely to benefit from preoperative coronary artery disease optimization.     

Critical appraisal of cardiac risk stratification before elective vascular surgery

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of the cardiac risk stratification protocol proposed by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) in predicting cardiac morbidity and mortality associated with elective, major arterial surgery. Cardiac risk stratification using ACC/AHA guidelines was done on 425 consecutive patients before 481 elective cerebrovascular (n = 146), aortic/inflow (n = 166), or infrainguinal (n = 169) procedures at an academic Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Cardiac risk was stratified as low, intermediate, or high based on clinical risk factors, such as, Eagle criteria, history of cardiac intervention, patient functional status, results of noninvasive cardiac stress testing, and coronary angiography with coronary revascularization performed when appropriate. Outcomes (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, cardiac death, and mortality) within 30 days of surgery were compared between the various risk stratification groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify clinically useful prognostic variables from the preoperative cardiac evaluation algorithm. Overall mortality (1.7%), cardiac death (0.4%), and adverse cardiac event (4.8%) rates were low, but cardiac death and morbidity were increased (p < 0.05) in high-risk stratified patients (3.4%, 11.9%) compared to intermediate (0%, 2.8%) and low (0%, 4.0%) cardiac risk groups. The presence of 3-vessel angiographic coronary artery occlusive disease was an independent predictor of cardiac morbidity, while inducible ischemia by cardiac stress imaging was not. Previous coronary revascularization was associated with increased mortality as was the development of a non-cardiac complication. Cardiac risk assessment identified 78 (18%) patients with indications for coronary angiography. Angiographic findings resulted in coronary artery intervention (9-angioplasty; 4-bypass grafting) in 13 (3%) patients who experienced no adverse cardiac events after the planned vascular surgery (15 procedures). Cardiac risk stratification using ACC/AHA guidelines can predict adverse cardiac events associated with elective vascular surgery; however, protocol modification by increased reliance on Eagle criteria and less use of cardiac stress testing can improve identification of the "highest risk" patients who may benefit from prophylactic coronary intervention.     

In the current era, complete revascularization improves survival after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization has been the standard for coronary bypass grafting. However, surgical intervention has evolved with increasing use of arterial conduits and off-pump techniques. METHODS: Patients undergoing non-redo bypass surgery from January 1998 through December 2000 were followed up with questionnaires and telephone contact. Incomplete revascularization was defined as absence of bypass grafts placed to a coronary territory supplied by a vessel with 50% or greater stenosis. RESULTS: One thousand thirty-four patients were followed for a mean of 3.3 +/- 1.6 years. Complete revascularization was found in 937 (90.6%) patients, and incomplete revascularization was found in 97 (9.4%) patients. Eight hundred twenty-seven (80.4%) patients underwent on-pump operations, and 207 (19.6%) underwent off-pump operations. Incomplete revascularization was more prevalent in off-pump versus on-pump operations (21.7% vs 6.3%, P < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that in-hospital cerebrovascular accidents (hazard ratio, 5.49; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 1.97; P = .019), and incomplete revascularization (hazard ratio, 1.85; P = .040) predicted an increased hazard (risk) of cardiac death. Left internal thoracic artery (hazard ratio, 0.38; P = .047), right internal thoracic artery (hazard ratio, 0.25; P = .019), and radial artery (hazard ratio, 0.36; P < .001) grafting reduced the risk of cardiac death. The 5-year unadjusted survival rate was 52.6% versus 82.4% in patients undergoing incomplete and complete revascularization ( P < .001), with cardiac survival rates of 74.5% versus 93.1%, respectively ( P < .001). However, this difference in cardiac survival was smaller in octogenarians with incomplete versus complete revascularizations (77.4% vs 87.6%, P = .101) and was essentially absent in off-pump versus on-pump operations if complete revascularization was achieved in both cases (93.6% vs 93.1%, P > .200). CONCLUSIONS: Complete revascularization and arterial grafting improve 5-year survival. Off-pump techniques do not affect survival. Complete revascularization should be performed whenever possible.     

Isolated high-grade lesion of the proximal LAD: a stent or off-pump LIMA?

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with an isolated high-grade stenosis of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery randomized to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting (PCI, stenting) or to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (surgery). METHODS: Patients with an isolated high-grade stenosis (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification type B2/C) of the proximal LAD were randomly assigned to stenting (n=51) or to surgery (n=51) and were followed for 3-5 years (mean 4 years). Primary composite endpoint was freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke and repeat target vessel revascularization. Secondary endpoints were angina pectoris status and need for anti-anginal medication at follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: MACCEs occurred in 27.5% after stenting and 9.8% after surgery (P=0.02; absolute risk reduction 17.7%). Freedom from angina pectoris was 67% after stenting and 85% after surgery (P=0.036). Need for anti-anginal medication was significantly lower after surgery compared to stenting (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Patients with an isolated high-grade lesion of the proximal LAD have a significantly better 4-year clinical outcome after off-pump coronary bypass grafting than after PCI.     

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with general versus local anesthesia: a comparison of cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality rates

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality rates after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EAAA) repair with local anesthesia (LA) with intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: Data from patients who underwent elective infrarenal EAAA repair between June 1996 and October 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with two or more Eagle clinical cardiac risk factors were considered to be at increased risk for a major postoperative cardiac event. Univariate and multivariate analyses for major cardiac and pulmonary morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed with respect to anesthetic type (GA versus LA), age, size of aneurysm, mean number of Eagle risk factors, and presence of two or more cardiac risk factors. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients underwent EAAA repair. The GA (158 patients) and LA (71 patients) groups were significantly different with respect to mean age (73 versus 76 years; P =.01) and mean number of cardiac risk factors per patient (1.2 versus 1.6; P =.002). No difference was seen in the overall cardiopulmonary complication rate (13% for GA and 19% for LA; P =.3), pulmonary complication rate (3.8% for GA and 7% for LA; P =.3), or cardiopulmonary mortality rate (3.2% for GA and 2.8% for LA; P =.9). The major cardiac event rate was higher in patients with two or more Eagle risk factors (22%) versus those patients with one or less Eagle risk factors (3.4%; P <.001), irrespective of anesthetic type. In analysis of patients with one or less Eagle risk factors, no difference was seen in the major cardiac event rate by anesthetic type (3% for GA and 5% for LA; P =.6). Also, no difference was seen in major cardiac events in patients with two or more Eagle risk factors by anesthetic type (24% for GA and 22% for LA). On multivariate analysis, the mean number of Eagle risk factors per patient (P <.0001) and the presence of two or more Eagle risk factors were associated with major cardiac and cardiopulmonary complications, whereas age, size of AAA, and anesthetic type were not. CONCLUSION: No difference exists in overall cardiac and pulmonary morbidity and mortality rates after EAAA repair in comparison of GA and LA. The presence of two or more preoperative cardiac risk factors significantly increases the risk of a major postoperative cardiac event.     

Long-term effects of surgical angiogenic therapy with fibroblast growth factor 2 protein

OBJECTIVE: The long-term effects of surgical fibroblast growth factor 2 therapy are examined. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, fibroblast growth factor 2 (10 microg or 100 microg) or placebo (n = 8 each) was delivered in the ungraftable myocardial territory of patients concomitantly undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients were followed up to 32.2 +/- 6.8 months postoperatively with clinical assessment and nuclear perfusion imaging. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the 3 groups. There were 2 late deaths, one of pancreatic cancer and one of undetermined cause (both in the 100-microg fibroblast growth factor 2 group). Two patients (both in the control group) underwent a total of 6 repeat cardiac catheterizations for recurrent coronary events. Mean Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class improved at late follow-up from baseline in all groups (P < or = .02); however, patients treated with either dose of fibroblast growth factor 2 had significantly more freedom from angina recurrence than those treated with placebo (P =.03). Late nuclear perfusion scans revealed a persistent reversible or a new, fixed perfusion defect in the ungraftable territory of 4 of 5 patients who received placebo versus only 1 of 9 patients treated with fibroblast growth factor 2 (P =.02). The overall sum of left ventricular stress perfusion defect scores was also lower in fibroblast growth factor 2-treated patients than in control subjects (1.3 +/- 1.4 vs 3.9 +/- 2.1, respectively; P =.04). A trend toward a higher late left ventricular ejection fraction was noted in fibroblast growth factor 2-treated patients (55.1% +/- 14.6% vs 44.3% +/- 6.5%, fibroblast growth factor 2-treated patients versus control subjects; P =.12). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that surgical angiogenic therapy with sustained-release fibroblast growth factor 2 may result in a prolonged myocardial revascularization effect that could translate into clinical benefit.     

Renal allograft outcomes in African American versus Caucasian transplant recipients in the tacrolimus era

METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1999, 185 kidney transplants were performed with tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression including 120 African American (AA, 65%) and 65 Caucasian recipients (C, 35%). Mean follow-up was 34 months. The AA group was characterized by a higher incidence of renal disease due to hypertension (72% AA vs 37% C, P <.001), pretransplant dialysis (95% AA vs 82% C, P =.003), waiting time (1.9 years AA vs 1.1 years C, P =.02), cadaveric donation (88% AA vs 68% C, P =.01), HLA mismatching (mean 3.5 AA vs 2.4 C, P <.001), and delayed graft function (DGF; 50% AA vs 22% C, P =.001). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 96% AA versus 83% C (P = NS) and 83% AA versus 75% C, (P = NS), respectively. The incidence of acute rejection (21% AA vs 12% C, P = NS) and mean time to acute rejection (12 months AA vs 11 months C) were similar. Although the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was comparable (7% AA vs 5% C), the mean time to CAN was shorter in AA recipients (18 months AA vs 37 months C, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest marked improvement in post-transplant outcomes in the TAC era in patients with multiple immunologic risk factors including AA ethnicity, cadaveric donor source, DGF, and HLA mismatching.     

Guidelines for cardiac management in noncardiac surgery are poorly implemented in clinical practice: results from a peripheral vascular survey in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery recommend an algorithm for a stepwise approach to preoperative cardiac assessment in vascular surgery patients. The authors' main objective was to determine adherence to the ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative care in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Between May and December 2004, data on 711 consecutive peripheral vascular surgery patients were collected from 11 hospitals in The Netherlands. This survey was conducted within the infrastructure of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. The authors retrospectively applied the ACC/AHA guideline algorithm to each patient in their data set and subsequently compared observed clinical practice data with these recommendations. RESULTS: Although 185 of the total 711 patients (26%) fulfilled the ACC/AHA guideline criteria to recommend preoperative noninvasive cardiac testing, clinicians had performed testing in only 38 of those cases (21%). Conversely, of the 526 patients for whom noninvasive testing was not recommended, guidelines were followed in 467 patients (89%). Overall, patients who had not been tested, irrespective of guideline recommendation, received less cardioprotective medications, whereas patients who underwent noninvasive testing were significantly more often treated with cardiovascular drugs (beta-blockers 43% vs. 77%, statins 52% vs. 83%, platelet inhibitors 80% vs. 85%, respectively; all P < 0.05). Moreover, the authors did not observe significant differences in cardiovascular medical therapy between patients with a normal test result and patients with an abnormal test result. CONCLUSION: This survey showed poor agreement between ACC/AHA guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice. Only one of each five patients underwent noninvasive testing when recommended. Furthermore, patients who had not undergone testing despite recommendations received as little cardiac management as the low-risk population.     

Revascularization in multivessel disease: comparison between two-year outcomes of coronary bypass surgery and stenting

OBJECTIVE: The recent appreciation that stenting has improved the short- and long-term outcomes of patients treated with coronary angioplasty has made it imperative to reconsider the comparison between surgery and percutaneous interventions in patients with multivessel disease. METHODS: One thousand two hundred five patients were randomly assigned to undergo bypass surgery or angioplasty with stent implantation when there was consensus between the cardiac surgeon and interventional cardiologist as to equivalent treatability. The primary clinical end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 1 year. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 2 years constituted a secondary end point. RESULTS: At 2 years, 89.6% of the surgical group and 89.2% of the stent group were free from death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (log-rank test P =.65). Among patients who survived without stroke or myocardial infarction, 19.7% in the stent group underwent a second revascularization, as compared with 4.8% in the surgical group (P <.001). At 2 years, 84.8% of the surgical group and 69.5% of the stent group were event-free survivors (log-rank test P <.001), and 87.2% in the surgical cohort and 79.6 % in the stent group were angina-free survivors (P =.001). In the diabetes subgroup, 82.3% of the surgical group and 56.3% of the stent group were free from any events after 2 years (log-rank test P <.001). CONCLUSION: The difference in outcome between surgery and stenting observed at 1 year in patients with multivessel disease remained essentially unchanged at 2 years. Stenting was associated with a greater need for repeat revascularization. In view of the relatively greater difference in outcome in patients with diabetes, surgery clearly seems to be the preferable form of treatment for these patients.     

Guidelines for Cardiac Management in Noncardiac Surgery Are Poorly Implemented in Clinical Practice: Results from a Peripheral Vascular Survey in The Netherlands

Background: The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery recommend an algorithm for a stepwise approach to preoperative cardiac assessment in vascular surgery patients. The authors' main objective was to determine adherence to the ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative care in daily clinical practice.

Methods: Between May and December 2004, data on 711 consecutive peripheral vascular surgery patients were collected from 11 hospitals in The Netherlands. This survey was conducted within the infrastructure of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. The authors retrospectively applied the ACC/AHA guideline algorithm to each patient in their data set and subsequently compared observed clinical practice data with these recommendations.

Results: Although 185 of the total 711 patients (26%) fulfilled the ACC/AHA guideline criteria to recommend preoperative noninvasive cardiac testing, clinicians had performed testing in only 38 of those cases (21%). Conversely, of the 526 patients for whom noninvasive testing was not recommended, guidelines were followed in 467 patients (89%). Overall, patients who had not been tested, irrespective of guideline recommendation, received less cardioprotective medications, whereas patients who underwent noninvasive testing were significantly more often treated with cardiovascular drugs ([beta]-blockers 43% vs. 77%, statins 52% vs. 83%, platelet inhibitors 80% vs. 85%, respectively; all P < 0.05). Moreover, the authors did not observe significant differences in cardiovascular medical therapy between patients with a normal test result and patients with an abnormal test result.     

Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThe introduction and integration of robot technology into modern spine surgery provides surgeons with millimeter accuracy for pedicle screw placement. Coupled with computer-based navigation platforms, robot-assisted spine surgery utilizes augmented reality to potentially improve the safety profile of instrumentation.PURPOSEIn this study, the authors seek to determine the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement compared to conventional free-hand (FH) technique.STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGWe conducted a systematic review of the electronic databases using different MeSH terms from 1980 to 2020.OUTCOME MEASURESThe present study measures pedicle screw accuracy, complication rates, proximal-facet joint violation, intraoperative radiation time, radiation dosage, and length of surgery.RESULTSA total of 1,525 patients (7,379 pedicle screws) from 19 studies with 777 patients (51.0% with 3,684 pedicle screws) in the robotic-assisted group were included. Perfect pedicle screw accuracy, as categorized by Gerztbein-Robbin Grade A, was significantly superior with robotic-assisted surgery compared to FH-technique (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20–2.35; p=.003). Similarly, clinically acceptable pedicle screw accuracy (Grade A+B) was significantly higher with robotic-assisted surgery versus FH-technique (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.01–2.37; p=.05). Furthermore, the complication rates and proximal-facet joint violation were 69% (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.20–0.48; p<.00001) and 92% less likely (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03–0.20; p<.00001) with robotic-assisted surgery versus FH-group. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw implantation significantly reduced intraoperative radiation time (MD: ?5.30, 95% CI: ?6.83–3.76; p<.00001) and radiation dosage (MD: ?3.70, 95% CI: ?4.80–2.60; p<.00001) compared to the conventional FH-group. However, the length of surgery was significantly higher with robotic-assisted surgery (MD: 22.70, 95% CI: 6.57–38.83; p=.006) compared to the FH-group.CONCLUSIONThis meta-analysis corroborates the accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement.     

Transmyocardial laser revascularization combined with coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter, blinded, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of transmyocardial revascularization combined with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients not amenable to complete revascularization by coronary bypass alone. METHODS: A total of 263 patients whose standard of care was coronary artery bypass grafting and who had one or more ischemic areas not amenable to bypass grafting were prospectively randomized to receive coronary bypass of suitable vessels plus transmyocardial revascularization to areas not graftable (n = 132) or coronary bypass alone with nongraftable areas left unrevascularized (n = 131). Group preoperative demographics and operative characteristics were similar. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate after coronary bypass/transmyocardial revascularization was 1.5% (2/132) versus 7.6% (10/131) after coronary bypass alone (P =.02). Patients undergoing both coronary bypass and transmyocardial revascularization required less postoperative inotropic support (30% vs 55%, P =.0001) and had a trend toward fewer insertions of intra-aortic balloon pumps (4% vs 8%, P =.13) than did patients having coronary bypass alone. Multivariable predictors of operative mortality were coronary artery bypass alone (odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-25.7; P =.04) and increased age (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1. 0-1.2; P =.03). One-year Kaplan-Meier survival (95% vs 89%, P =.05) and freedom from major adverse cardiac events defined as death or myocardial infarction (92% vs 86%, P =.09) favored the combination of coronary bypass and transmyocardial revascularization. Baseline to 12-month improvement in angina and exercise treadmill scores was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, transmyocardial revascularization combined with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients not amenable to complete revascularization by coronary bypass alone was safe; however, angina relief and exercise treadmill improvement were indistinguishable between groups at 12 months of follow-up. Operative and 1-year survival benefits observed after adjunctive transmyocardial revascularization require confirmation by a larger validation study, which is ongoing.     

Effect of posterior pericardiotomy on postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias and late pericardial effusion (posterior pericardiotomy).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy from the point of pericardial effusion related with supraventricular tachycardia and development of delayed posterior cardiac effusions. Materials and methods: This prospective randomized study was carried out in 200 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery in Gülhane Medical Academy Department of Cardiovascular Surgery between June 1996 and June 1997. Patients were divided into 2 groups; each group included 100 patients. Longitudinal incision was made parallel and posterior to the left phrenic nerve, extending from the left inferior pulmonary vein to the diaphragm in group I patients. Posterior pericardiotomy was not done in group II. RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation was developed in 6 patients (6%) in group I and in 34 patients (34%) in group II (P =.0000007). Atrial flutter and other supraventricular arrhythmia prevalence was not statistically significant. Early and late pericardial effusion were developed 54% and 21%, respectively, in group II, but neither early nor late pericardial effusion were developed in group I (P =.00001). Delayed pericardial tamponade was also significantly lower in group I (0% vs 10%; P =.001). CONCLUSION: Posterior pericardiotomy is technically easy to perform and a safe and effective technique that reduces not only the prevalence of early pericardial effusion and related atrial fibrillation but also delayed posterior pericardial effusion and tamponade.     

Long-term outcome of infrainguinal bypass grafting in patients with serologically proven hypercoagulability

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the long-term outcome of infrainguinal bypass grafting in patients with congenital or acquired hypercoagulability is inferior to the results in patients without documented clotting disorders. METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients from January 1994 to January 2001. RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-two infrainguinal bypass grafts were created in 456 patients. Indication for surgery was limb-threatening ischemia in 84%; prosthetic conduits were implanted in 38%. Seventy-four grafts were created in 57 patients with one or more serologically proven hypercoagulable states, including heparin-induced platelet aggregation (n = 37), anticardiolipin antibodies (n = 11), lupus anticoagulant (n = 8), protein C or S deficiency (n = 7), antithrombin III deficiency (n = 3), and factor V Leiden mutation (n = 1). Patients with hypercoagulability were younger (63 +/- 2 years versus 69 +/- 1 years; P =.007), more likely to have undergone prior revascularization attempts (38% versus 21%; P =.003), and more likely to have chronic anticoagulation therapy after surgery (46% versus 25%; P =.001). After 5 years (median follow-up, 19 months), patients with hypercoagulability had poorer primary patency (28% +/- 7% versus 35% +/- 5%; P =.004), primary assisted patency (37% +/- 7% versus 45% +/- 6%; P =.0001), secondary patency (41% +/- 7% versus 53% +/- 6%; P =.0001), limb salvage (55% +/- 8% versus 67% +/- 6%; P =.009), and survival (61% +/- 8% versus 74% +/- 4%; P =.02) rates. Multivariate analysis identified only prosthetic conduit choice (P =.0001), hypercoagulability (P =.0003), and limb salvage indication (P =.01) as independent predictors of graft failure. CONCLUSION: Patients with serologically proven hypercoagulability have inferior long-term patency, limb salvage, and survival rates after infrainguinal bypass. The high prevalence rate (13%) of diverse hypercoagulable states in this patient population supports serologic screening, especially in referral practices.