Induction therapy in lung transplantation: a prospective, controlled clinical trial comparing OKT3, anti-thymocyte globulin, and daclizumab

BACKGROUND: Because acute rejection is associated with inferior outcomes in lung transplantation, we have routinely employed OKT3, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), or daclizumab as adjuncts to reduce rejection. METHOD: We performed a 4-year prospective, controlled clinical trial of these 3 therapies to determine differences in post-operative infection, rejection, survival, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Eighty-seven consecutive lung transplant patients received OKT3 (n = 30), ATG (n = 34), and daclizumab (n = 23) as induction agents. The groups had similar demographics and immunosuppression protocols differing only in induction agents used. RESULTS: No differences were observed in immediate post-operative outcomes such as length of hospitalization, ICU stay, or time on ventilators. Twelve months post-transplant, OKT3 had more infections per patient than the other agents, a difference that only became significant 2 months post-operatively (p = 0.009). The most common infection was bacterial and OKT3 had more bacterial infections than any other agent. Daclizumab had more patients remain infection free in the first year (p = 0.02), having no fungal infections and a low rate of viral infections. No patient receiving daclizumab developed drug specific side-effects. Only those patients with episodes of acute rejection developed BOS. There were no significant differences in the freedom from acute rejection or BOS between the groups. The 2-year survival for the entire cohort was 68%, with no differences observed in patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study again reveals the importance of acute rejection in the subsequent development of BOS. Although daclizumab offers a low risk of post-transplant infection and drug specific side-effects, no drug is superior in delaying rejection or BOS or in prolonging long-term survival.     

Early experience with two-dose daclizumab in the prevention of acute rejection in cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND: Daclizumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the interleukin-2 receptor. It has been used as induction therapy in heart transplantation with repeated administrations over several weeks. At our institution, we use a two-dose regimen of daclizumab based on its extended half-life. We sought to determine the incidence of acute rejection with 2-dose daclizumab in cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive heart transplants performed at a single center were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received daclizumab (2 mg/kg) within 8 h of cardiac transplantation and a second dose (1 mg/kg) 2 wk thereafter. Maintenance immunosupression included mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone and either cyclosporine or tacrolimus, based on side-effect profile. The endpoint was the incidence of acute rejection as defined by a histologic grade >2 according to the classification of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation. RESULTS: Four patients had acute rejections (all were 3A) during the first 3 months post-transplantation. All four patients had rejection at the first biopsy and only two had rejection thereafter. None of the rejections were hemodynamically significant and no patients were hospitalized. All except one rejection was seen in the context of low 2-h cyclosporine levels. The two-dose regimen was easier to administer on an outpatient basis and resulted in lower cost. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary report suggests that induction therapy with a two-dose regimen of daclizumab appears to be safe and well tolerated in patients undergoing cardiac transplantation.     

Prophylactic therapy for rejection after cardiac transplantation. A comparison of rabbit antithymocyte globulin and OKT3

The value of prophylactic monoclonal or polyclonal antibody therapy early after cardiac transplantation is controversial. Between Jan. 1, 1987, and July 1, 1988, 32 consecutive patients underwent cardiac transplantation (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone maintenance therapy) with either early prophylactic rabbit antithymocyte globulin (n = 17) or monoclonal OKT3 (Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Raritan, N.J.) (10 days) (n = 15). Follow-up was through Sept. 1, 1988, for morbid events and through Jan. 1, 1989, for survival. All patients (100%) survived the study period (follow-up of 6 to 24 months). The efficacy of rabbit antithymocyte globulin and OKT3 prophylaxis was similar regarding median time (days) to first rejection (16 versus 21 days, p = 0.5), number of rejection episodes during first 2 months (1.5 versus 1.3 days, p = 0.8), and freedom from rejection at 2 months (18% versus 27%, p = 0.8). Early infections were slightly less common in the rabbit antithymocyte globulin group than the OKT3 group (median time to first infection: 318 versus 250 days, p = 0.5; freedom from rejection at 2 months: 82% versus 64%, p = 0.21), although differences were likely due to chance. Cytomegalovirus syndrome was common, with one case of cytomegalovirus pneumonia. T-cell markers during OKT3 treatment did not predict subsequent rejection (within 2 weeks after OKT3) as assessed by mean T3-lymphocyte count during OKT3 use (p = 0.3) or T3-lymphocyte count during the last 3 days of OKT3 use (p = 0.4). Inferences: (1) Prophylactic rabbit antithymocyte globulin or OKT3 with triple-drug immunosuppression yields excellent intermediate survival after heart transplantation. (2) These protocols for rabbit antithymocyte globulin and OKT3 provide similar protection against early rejection with a relatively low risk of early infection. (3) T-cell markers do not predict early rejection after OKT3.     

Induction therapy in lung transplantation: initial single-center experience comparing daclizumab and antithymocyte globulin

Acute and chronic rejection remain unresolved problems after lung transplantation, despite heavy multidrug immunosuppression. Because acute rejection is associated with inferior outcomes in lung transplantation, we have routinely employed antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or daclizumab as adjuncts to reduce the incidence of rejection episodes. METHODS: We performed a controlled clinical trial of the two therapies to evaluate differences in postoperative rejection, infection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and host survival. Twenty-five consecutive lung transplant patients received ATG (n = 12; group 1) or daclizumab (n = 13; group 2) as an induction agent. The groups showed similar demographics and immunosuppression protocols, differ only in induction agent. RESULTS: No differences were observed in the immediate postoperative outcomes, such as length of hospitalization, ICU stay, or time on ventilator. There were no significant differences in the number of episodes of acute rejection, freedom from BOS, or infections. Freedom from acute rejection was significantly greater with daclizumab than with ATG (P = .037). The 1-year survival for group 1 was 67% and for group 2, 77% (P = .584). CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab constitutes a safe and effective form of induction immunosuppressive therapy. Using a two-dose administration schedule, daclizumab prolonged the time without acute rejection compared to ATG. The differences in the incidence of infectious complications, acute rejection, or BOS as well as the short-term or long-term results were not significantly different. The results of the study justify the further use of daclizumab as an induction agent in patients following lung transplantation.     

舒莱和赛尼哌预防肾移植后急性排斥反应的效果比较

目的评价比较2剂舒莱(basiliximab)和赛尼哌(daclizumab)在肾移植中诱导治疗预防急性排斥的有效性及安全性. 方法选择58例肾移植患者,随机分成舒莱组(30例)和赛尼哌组(28例),在三联免疫抑制剂基础上(环孢素+骁悉+泼尼松,CsA+MMF+Pred.CsA首剂6 mg·kg-1·d-1,3个月减至4～5 mg·kg-1·d-1,6个月减至3～4 mg·kg-1·d-1,其间根据血药浓度调整剂量.MMF首剂0.5 g/次,3次/d,1个月后减至0.5 g/次,2次/d.Pred首剂30 mg/d,3周后减至20 mg/d,6个月减至10～15 mg/d),分别予2剂舒莱(术前2 h及术后第4天各20 mg 静滴)及2剂赛尼哌(术前24 h及术后第14天各50 mg静滴)治疗.观察术后6个月2组急性排斥及术后6～12个月不良事件和人/肾存活情况,以流式细胞仪监测术前及术后每周1次共8周外周血中淋巴细胞CD25+变化. 结果术后6个月,赛尼哌组6例出现急性排斥反应,舒莱组无急性排斥发生(P<0.05).用药后,两组外周血中淋巴细胞CD25+均下降,舒莱组由术前(37.7±2.3)%持续下降至第6周的(1.5±0.1)%,赛尼哌组由术前(37.7±2.9)%持续下降至第4周的(1.4±0.1)%.随后分别上升,舒莱组在第8周升至(21.3±1.6)%,达正常水平(37.3±2.6)%的60%;赛尼哌组在第8周达到正常水平.术后6～12个月舒莱组和赛尼哌组各有2例细菌感染,CMV感染者分别为1例和2例,未见肿瘤及其他并发症,两组患者均100%存活,各有1例出现移植肾丢失. 结论 2剂舒莱比2剂赛尼哌预防肾移植术后急性排斥的效果好,对CD25+封闭时间长.安全性方面两组差异无显著性意义.     

Experience with single-dose daclizumab in the prevention of acute rejection in heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Daclizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the interleukin-2 receptor. It has been used as induction therapy in heart transplantation with two to five repeated administrations over several weeks. The objective of our study was to estimate the efficacy and safety of induction therapy with only one dose of daclizumab in a consecutive series of patients undergoing heart transplantation. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive heart transplants performed since July 2002, who received single-dose daclizumab as induction therapy, were compared with the 30 patients transplanted previously, who received OKT3. In both groups, maintenance immunosuppression included cyclosporine or tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Follow-up time was 1 year. RESULTS: There were no baseline differences between the two groups regarding age, gender, or etiology. In the group treated with daclizumab there were more diabetics (43% versus 10%, P = .01) and the ischemia time was longer (192 versus 156 minutes, P = .03). During the first posttransplant year, 76% of patients treated with OKT3 and 55% of those treated with daclizumab presented acute rejection > or =3A; 20% and 25%, respectively, presented infections; and 5 (17%) patients in the OKT3 group and 2 (6%) in the group treated with daclizumab died. None of these differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that induction therapy with a single-dose regimen of daclizumab seems to have an efficacy and safety profile similar to OKT3, and it is easier to administer and has a lower cost than other induction regimens.     

Effect of prophylaxis with low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin on prevention of acute kidney allograft rejection

INTRODUCTION: During kidney transplantation, the first contact between the recipient's immune system and the donor organ takes place immediately following the arterial anastomosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a single, low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) prophylaxis in the reduction of early acute rejection in renal allograft recipients. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, we studied the rate of acute rejection within the first month of kidney transplantation in patients who had received their transplant at a single center between the years 2004 and 2007. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 37) received cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine, and prednisolone; group 2 (n = 31) received the above-mentioned agents plus a single ATG bolus (Thymoglobulin; SangStat, Lyon, France; 4-5 mg/kg) the night before the transplantation ( approximately 12 hours before the operation). Blood urea and serum creatinine levels were measured regularly in the posttransplantation period. Acute allograft rejection was justified clinically and/or pathologically. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 13.0 using Student t test and Fisher exact test. A P value < or = .05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: There were no significant differences regarding the age and gender ratio between the 2 groups. Acute allograft rejection was found in 32.4% (n = 12) of group 1 patients, and was reduced to 12.9% (n = 4) in group 2 (P = .05). Hence, the first-month acute rejection episodes decreased by approximately 60% with ATG prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of a single and low-dose ATG the night before kidney transplantation could reduce the risk of acute allograft rejection in renal transplant recipients. However, further studies with a greater number of patients should be conducted to confirm these results.     

Induction therapy by anti-thymocyte globulin (rabbit) in renal transplantation: a 1-yr follow-up of safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND: Two hundred and forty cadaveric renal transplant recipients given anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) as induction immunotherapy were followed up prospectively to review safety and efficacy. METHODS: The median number of infusions was 10 [2-21] with a cumulative dose of 8.8 mg/kg [2.0-23.2 mg/kg]. During the fortnight following transplantation, 231 patients (96%) received a calcineurin inhibitor; all patients were given steroids and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. At 1 yr, 60% of patients were on tripletherapy, 38% on bitherapy, and 2% on monotherapy; 20% had discontinued steroids. RESULTS: Tolerance was excellent with no cases of anaphylaxis. The commonest adverse event was fever (55%). Eighteen patients developed serum sickness on median day 11 [10-14]. Seven patients had thrombocytopenia; six patients had severe neutropenia. All of these adverse events recovered spontaneously. The overall incidence of delayed graft function was 24%. At 1 yr patient and graft survival were 98 and 95%, respectively, and creatinine was 135 +/- 43 micromol/L. Clinically suspected and biopsy-proven acute rejection were observed in 65 patients (27%) and 34 patients (14%), respectively. There were 62 non-cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (two fatal) and 81 episodes of CMV infections. Eight malignancies were reported; two possibly related to immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that anti-thymocyte globulin has a safety profile with good tolerability and excellent efficacy.     

Induction therapy for pediatric and adult heart transplantation: comparison between OKT3 and daclizumab

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy can reduce morbidity and early mortality in pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients. Monoclonal and polyclonal agents are most widely used; they nonspecifically deplete the T-cell pool and are thus associated with drug-induced side effects. The cytokine release syndrome is one of the most problematic events associated with induction. Daclizumab, a highly humanized, specific interleukin-2 receptor blocker, may be efficacious to the monoclonal agent, OKT3. Due to its specific action and properties, the safety profile of this agent may be superior to OKT3. METHODS: Forty subjects received daclizumab and their clinical outcomes were compared against a historical group of 40 subjects who received OKT3. Three- and six-month outcome measures included survival, rejection history, steroid burden, and complications. RESULTS: Mortality was low between the groups with equivalent 6-month survival. No differences in rejection profile or time to the first significant rejection event were detected; no subject had severe acute rejection within the first 180 days. Steroid requirement for maintenance immunosuppression and treatment of rejection was also similar between the groups. Six-month prevalence for complications were significantly different; 55% of OKT3-treated subjects having at least one event compared to 33% of daclizumab-treated subjects (P=0.04). The likelihood of complications occurred within the first month after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab induction therapy is as efficacious as OKT3 in the prevention of early acute rejection after heart transplantation among pediatric and adult subjects. Complications related to the induction agent are significantly lower in the humanized product.     

Results of 3-year phase III clinical trials with daclizumab prophylaxis for prevention of acute rejection after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Daclizumab (Zenapax, Roche Pharmaceuticals), a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of the interleukin 2 receptor, has been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection at 6 months after renal transplantation in two phase III clinical trials. This report presents the combined 1- and 3-year outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who participated in these two phase III clinical trials. METHODS: Data from two multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trials were evaluated with regard to graft survival, patient survival, incidence of malignancies (including lymphoma), renal function (serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate [GFR]), and current maintenance immunosuppressive regimen. In addition, the impact of acute rejection and acute rejection requiring treatment with antilymphocyte therapy upon 3-year graft survival was evaluated. Daclizumab was compared to placebo on a background of cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine, and corticosteroids (triple therapy, TT) or CsA and corticosteroids (double therapy, DT). RESULTS: Treatment with daclizumab in the pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes at 12 months posttransplant (43% vs. 28%, P<0.001). The 3-year graft survival was not significantly different between placebo and daclizumab-treated patients in the TT trial (83% vs. 84%) or in the DT trial (78% vs. 82%). Pooled patient survival was excellent in both placebo- (91%) and daclizumab- (93%) treated patients. The incidence of malignancies or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in placebo- versus daclizumab-treated groups was comparable in both clinical trials. Renal function was similar between placebo- and daclizumab-treated groups in both the TT and DT trials. The occurrence of delayed graft function, acute rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy at 6 months, and acute rejection at 12 months posttransplant were associated with decreased graft survival rates at 3 years posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of daclizumab prophylaxis upon the incidence of acute rejection after renal transplant with TT or with DT was not associated with adverse clinical sequelae, including the development of PTLD, at 3 years posttransplant. There was no beneficial effect of daclizumab on graft survival at 3 years, but the trial was inadequately powered to detect this. Both studies showed excellent graft and patient survival at 3 years.     

Rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin for the prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplantation

This report describes the results of 2 international randomized trials (total of 508 kidney transplant recipients). The primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin (rATG, Thymoglobulin^®) versus interleukin‐2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) for the quadruple endpoint (treatment failure defined as biopsy‐proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow‐up) to serve as the pivotal data for United States (US) regulatory approval of rATG. The pooled analysis provided an incidence of treatment failure of 25.1% in the rATG and 36.0% in the IL2RA treatment groups, an absolute difference of ?10.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] ?18.8% to ?2.9%) supporting noninferiority (noninferiority margin was 10%) and superiority of rATG to IL2RA. In a meta‐analysis of 7 trials comparing rATG with an IL2RA, the difference in the proportion of patients with BPAR at 12 months was ?4.8% (95% CI ?8.6% to ?0.9%) in favor of rATG. In conclusion, a rigorous reanalysis of patient‐level data from 2 prior randomized, controlled trials comparing rATG versus IL‐2R monoclonal antibodies provided support for regulatory approval for rATG for induction therapy in renal transplant, making it the first T cell–depleting therapy approved for the prophylaxis of acute rejection in patients receiving a kidney transplant in the United States.     

西罗莫司在肾移植后初始免疫抑制治疗中的应用

目的探讨西罗莫司预防肾移植后急性排斥反应的有效性和安全性。方法36例肾移植患者,31例在术后即开始应用西罗莫司,其中30例应用减剂量环孢素A(CsA)、西罗莫司及泼尼松预防排斥反应,1例应用他克莫司、两罗莫司及泼尼松预防排斥反应;5例在术后1个月内因CsA的不良反应而将CsA替换为西罗莫司,其中1例改为减剂量CsA、西罗莫司及泼尼松,3例改为西罗莫司、霉酚酸酯及泼尼松,1例改为西罗莫司及泼尼松。观察移植肾功能以及急性排斥反应、感染、移植肾功能恢复延迟(DGF)等的发生情况。结果术后随访18～40个月,有2例移植肾功能丧失,恢复血液透析,移植肾分别存活1.6年、1.8年;3例血肌酐>200μmol/L,发展成为慢性移植肾肾病;31例移植肾功能良好。4例发生急性排斥反应,经甲泼尼龙冲击治疗后逆转;8例发生感染,经抗感染处理后全部康复;6例发生DGF,免疫抑制方案未做调整,术后14～80 d恢复泌尿。西罗莫司后的不良反应包括血脂升高、一过性白细胞减少及蛋白尿等。结论肾移植后采用西罗莫司与减剂量CsA和泼尼松联用可取得较好的免疫抑制效果。     

骁悉和环孢素-A预防肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应

目的 探讨骁悉和环孢素－Ａ预防肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应的效果。方法 回顾性分析１９９７年１２月￣１９９９年１月临床资料完整肾移植患者１４６例,随访时间６￣１６个月。根据应用免疫抑制剂方案的不同分为硫唑嘌呤（Ａｚａ）组（环孢素－Ａ、泼尼松龙、Ａｚａ）和骁悉（ＭＭＦ）组（环孢素－Ａ、泼尼松、ＭＭＦ）。其中Ａｚａ组７８例,ＭＭＦ组６８例。所有受者术前行人类白细胞抗原（ＨＬＡ）配型,ＨＬＡ错配≤３个位点     

Short-term induction therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin and delayed use of calcineurin inhibitors in orthotopic liver transplantation.

The appropriate time point for starting immunosuppressive treatment with calcineurin inhibitors after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been a subject of debate. The aim of the study was to analyze the effects of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy on rejection, renal function, infection, tumor rate, and survival. We retrospectively analyzed 391 patients after OLT who had either received calcineurin inhibitors immediately after OLT (n = 129) or after an initial short-term Thymoglobulin induction therapy (n = 262). The 1-year acute rejection rate was 14.5% vs. 31.8% in favor of ATG (P = 0.0008). Rejection grades and the need for treatment also differed significantly (7.3% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.001). Serum creatinine at transplantation was similar in both groups (1.14 mg/dL vs.1.18 mg/dL; P = NS). Postoperative hemofiltration was less frequently seen after induction therapy (P < 0.05). Reduced renal function at 1 year was commonly observed, but serum creatinine (1.26 mg/dL vs. 1.37mg/dL; P = 0.015) and glomerular filtration rate (81 mL/min vs. 75 mL/min; P = 0.02) were far better in the ATG group. Undesired side effects occurred at a similar rate in both groups. Five-year patient survival was also similar in the 2 groups (70.1% and 74.3%; P > 0.05). Short-term ATG induction therapy with delayed administration of calcineurin inhibitors led to a more favorable rejection rate and an improved clinical course in case of a rejection episode. It has beneficial effects on renal function immediately after OLT as well as later, and no additional harmful effects.     

Rituximab therapy for acute humoral rejection after kidney transplantation

A pilot study was performed on eight consecutive renal-transplant (RT) patients presenting with acute humoral rejection (AHR) to assess the efficacy of monoclonal anti-B cell antibodies, such as rituximab (375 mg/m weekly) for 3 to 5 consecutive weeks, in addition to plasma exchange (PE), steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. AHR was associated with increased serum creatinine, the appearance of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA), and the presence of C4d in a transplant biopsy. After a follow-up of 10 months (range 7-23), patient and graft survivals were 100% and 75%, respectively. Renal function improved in six cases in which serum creatinine decreased from 297+/-140 to 156+/-53 micromol/L (P=0.015); graft loss occurred in two cases; and four patients had infectious complications. At last follow-up, DSA had disappeared or decreased in four cases. Rituximab therapy, in addition to PE, might be of benefit for RT patients presenting with AHR.     

Efficacy of tacrolimus rescue therapy in refractory acute rejection after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Encouraging results in transplantation of other solid organs led to investigation of the use of tacrolimus in lung transplantation as a salvage immunosuppressant in persistent acute rejection. METHODS: The incidence and severity of acute rejection and the number of steroid pulses were analyzed in 20 lung recipients who were converted from a cyclosporine- to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen because of refractory biopsy-proven acute rejection. RESULTS: Tacrolimus was started 12.0 +/- 13.0 months after transplantation, and the mean follow-up was 25.0 +/- 13.7 months. After shifting to tacrolimus, a significant decline was observed in both the number of acute rejections per patient (3.0 +/- 1.56 to 0.85 +/- 1.14, p < 0.0001), and the incidence of acute rejection per 100 patient-days (1.52 +/- 0.99 to 0.14 +/- 0.21, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the average histologic grade of rejection decreased from 1.9 +/- 0.8 to 0.4 +/- 0.5 (p < 0.0001). Methylprednisolone pulses similarly decreased from 1.9 +/- 1.3/patient to 0.3 +/- 0.7/patient (p < 0.0001). During cyclosporine immunosuppression, the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second decreased to 84.4% +/- 13.3% of individual best value. The average lung function parameters were stable 3 months after the change of medication, and then began to improve. After an average follow-up of 36.5 +/- 19.2 months, 2 patients have developed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (one has Stage 1 and one has Stage 3). CONCLUSION: Conversion to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen for refractory acute lung rejection is associated with reduced incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes, steroid sparing, and stabilization or improvement of pulmonary function.     

Plasma exchange in steroid and anti-thymocyte globulin resistant allograft rejection in children

Six children with steroid- and anti-thymocyte globulin-resistant transplant rejection were treated with plasma exchange. Three had a sustained improvement in renal function; two improved for a short period and one showed no benefit. Received March 20, 1995; received in revised form and accepted January 22, 1996     

A truncated-dose regimen of daclizumab for prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience

Daclizumab can decrease the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in renal transplant (RTx) recipients. In this prospective study, 52 RTx patients were divided into two groups according to the dose of daclizumab: 1 mg/kg on day 0 and every 14 days for five doses (group 1, n = 30) or a truncated regimen of 2 mg/kg on day 0 and on the day of discharge (group 2, n = 22). The following variables were recorded: demographics; delayed graft function; AR at 3, 6, and 12 months; time to AR; chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN); and serum creatinine. The overall incidences of AR were 23% and 27% (P = 0.76) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, whereas at 6 months they were 21% and 18% (P = 1.0). Median time to AR was 10 days in group 1 and 94 days in group 2 (P = 0.09). The incidence of CAN was 6.6% in group 1 and 13% in group 2 (P = 0.63). These data suggest that the truncated dose of daclizumab is as effective as the standard regimen for AR prophylaxis.