Immune tolerance therapy utilizing factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate in haemophilia A patients with high titre factor VIII inhibitors

Summary.  Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors remain a serious complication of treatment for patients with haemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) can eliminate inhibitors in the majority of patients, but there are major concerns related with this therapy. Investigators have raised the possibility that the use of FVIII/von Willebrand factor (FVIII/VWF) concentrates may improve the success rate of ITI and may shorten the duration of therapy necessary to attain tolerance. This retrospective study describes 25 patients at five institutions in the USA, who were treated with FVIII/VWF concentrate as part of their ITI. These were all patients who were considered poor prognosis because of clinical and laboratory characteristics, which made ITI less likely to be successful or because of a poor response to initial ITI with a monoclonal/recombinant FVIII concentrate. Overall success (complete tolerization) was 32% with another 40% attaining partial tolerization, but not complete tolerization. Of those patients attaining only partial tolerization, two patients ultimately discontinued ITI and had return of their high titre inhibitors. Eight percent of patients failed to attain either partial or complete tolerization and discontinued ITI. Another 24% are continuing with ITI but have titres of >10 BU. This study adds further retrospective data to the information regarding the use of FVIII/VWF concentrate in ITI.     

Pharmacokinetics of Optivate®, a high‐purity concentrate of factor VIII with von Willebrand factor,in patients with severe haemophilia A

Summary. Optivate^® is a high purity factor VIII/von Willebrand factor (FVIII/VWF) concentrate, which is manufactured using two antiviral processes: solvent/detergent and terminal dry heating (80°C for 72 h). A multicentre, non‐randomized open‐label study in 15 patients was conducted to test the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Optivate^®. PK variables were analysed for the patients’ prior FVIII product (PK1), their first dose of Optivate^® (PK2) and at 3 months therapy (PK3). Mean non‐compartmental half‐lives (h) were 14.1, 12.4 and 12.1, respectively (P = 0.45), mean clearances (mL h^?1 kg^?1) were 3.6, 3.2 and 3.1, respectively (P = 0.051), MRTs (h) were 19.0, 17.3 and 17.4, respectively (P = 0.39) and mean AUC_0–48h (h IU mL^?1) were 14.3, 15.4 and 16.6, respectively (P = 0.051) and mean AUC_0–∞ (h IU mL^?1) were 15.9, 16.4 and 17.9, respectively (P = 0.18). The recovery data from this PK study was aggregated with recovery data collected from another study, with similar design but devoid of the other PK measurements. A total of 309 recoveries were conducted in 70 patients. The overall mean recovery per subject across 27 Optivate^® batches was 2.7 IU dL^?1 per IU kg^?1. There were no clinical differences between Optivate^® and other FVIII products, and except for volume of distribution (Vd), no statistically significant differences were seen with respect to any of the other PK variables, or in recovery between weeks 0 and 12. Therefore, the PK of FVIII is not affected by the processes used to manufacture Optivate^®, which can be expected to be effective in the management of patients with haemophilia A.     

von Willebrand factor in factor VIII concentrates protects against neutralization by factor VIII antibodies of haemophilia A patients

We investigated the neutralization activity of factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies of 12 haemophilia A patients, acquired during treatment with plasma-derived FVIII concentrates. All plasma samples, drawn in a clinically stable situation before any immunotolerance treatment, contained anti-A2 domain and anti-light-chain FVIII antibodies. In nine patients' plasmas, containing relatively high amounts of FVIII light-chain antibodies (53-96%), a higher neutralization activity was found against recombinant FVIII concentrate (Recombinate) than against plasma-derived von Willebrand factor (vWF)-containing concentrate (Haemoctin SDH). No difference in neutralization of the two concentrates was found in two patients' plasmas with almost equal content of FVIII light- and heavy-chain antibodies, or one plasma with predominantly heavy-chain antibodies. These results suggest that haemophilia A patients with relatively high amounts of FVIII light-chain antibodies in plasma might benefit by infusion of FVIII concentrates containing vWF because vWF appears to have some protective effect on FVIII. This hypothesis should be tested by a clinical study.     

Low-dose continuous infusion of factor VIII in patients with haemophilia A

BackgroundPatients with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) can be given prophylactic or on-demand treatment administered by continuous infusion or bolus injections of factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX). In this study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose continuous infusion of FVIII or FIX.ResultsA total of 66 continuous infusions (40 in major surgery, 10 in minor surgery and 16 with bleeding episode) in 46 HA patients and 16 (15 in severe and 1 in mild HA) in eight HB patients were included in the study. During the first week of treatment, the median continuous infusion rates in HA patients undergoing major surgery, minor surgery and a bleeding event were 2.18 (0.75–3.68), 1.48 (1.0–2.54) and 2.24 (1.33–3.93) IU/kg/h, respectively. The median FVIII activities were 0.69 (0.37–1.19), 0.47 (0.39–0.84) and 0.52 (0.36–1.06) IU/mL. After the first week of treatment, even lower doses of FVIII were needed. Red blood cell transfusions had to be administered to three patients (2 with severe and 1 with moderate HA) during the continuous infusion and inhibitors developed in five patients. In HB patients, the median continuous infusion rate was 1.85 (1.07–2.94) IU/kg/h and the median FIX activity was 0.62 (0.30–1.04) IU/mL. Red blood cell transfusions were not required, and thrombophlebitis and inhibitors did not appear.DiscussionOverall, low-dose continuous infusion was shown to be an effective and safe way of treating patients with HA. The protocol used also proved efficient and safe in all HB patients.     

Intermittent injections vs. continuous infusion of factor VIII in haemophilia patients undergoing major surgery

Continuous infusion (CI) of factor VIII (FVIII) has been proved to be a safe alternative to intermittent bolus injections (BI) in haemophilia A. Most reports on CI suggest a considerable saving in FVIII compared with historical controls treated with BI, but some recent reports failed to demonstrate such an effect. The present study prospectively compared safety, efficacy and factor requirements in 43 major surgical procedures performed in severe haemophilia A patients who were treated with either BI (18 operations) or CI (25 operations). The aim was to maintain factor VIII levels above the same minimum levels. Improved safety of CI over BI was observed, despite a bias in favour of the BI group (all underwent unilateral operations, compared with 24% of the CI group who underwent bilateral operations). Higher nadir levels were found in the CI group (0.44 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.31 +/- 0.09 IU/ml; P < 0.01) with a lower incidence of dangerous drops below 0.3 IU/ml (8% vs. 44% of patients respectively; P < 0.01), and a lower drop in haemoglobin (Hb) (1.56 +/- 1.21 vs. 3.01 +/- 2.13 g/dl; P < 0.05) and blood transfusion requirements (12% vs. 39%; P < 0.01). Major bleeding complications developed in three out of 18 patients (17%) in the BI group and none of the CI group (P = 0.06). The FVIII dosage was lower by 36% in the CI group (467 +/- 104 vs. 733 +/- 126 IU/kg; P < 0.01). Had the trough factor levels been maintained at the target levels, a greater difference of 72% would probably have been observed.     

Clinical assessment of Optivate®, a high‐purity concentrate of factor VIII with von Willebrand factor,in the management of patients with haemophilia A

Summary. Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates have revolutionized the treatment of patients with haemophilia A. Concerns over the transmission of viral infections through these products have been addressed through stringent, donor‐screening procedures and robust antiviral manufacturing steps. Bio Products Laboratory has developed a high‐purity FVIII product with von Willebrand factor, Optivate^®. Its safety, tolerability and efficacy as prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds have been established in long‐term studies. Seventy previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A, with ≥20 exposure days, were recruited into two long‐term, multicentre, open‐label studies. The protocols were virtually identical. Patients received Optivate^® either prophylactically or on‐demand. A mean of 159.0 EDs were experienced over 11 320 infusions. Under both conditions, Optivate^® was well tolerated. Only 10% of patients experienced a treatment‐related adverse event; the most commonly reported were headache (4% of patients) and dizziness (3% of patients). The mean number of bleeds/patient over the 2 year treatment period was 23.5 during prophylactic use and 70.4 during on‐demand use. In patients treated prophylactically, clinical responses to breakthrough bleeds were rated by physicians as excellent or good and as very helpful or helpful by patients in 95% of bleeds. Clinical responses for on‐demand patients were rated as excellent or good by physicians and helpful or very helpful by the patients for 91% of bleeds. There were no viral transmissions or inhibitors. The studies confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of Optivate^® in both prophylactic and on‐demand management of patients with haemophilia A.     

Continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIII formulated with sucrose in surgery: Non‐interventional,observational study in patients with severe haemophilia A

In haemophilia A, continuous infusion (CI) of FVIII perioperatively provides a more constant FVIII level than conventional bolus injections, avoiding low trough levels that could increase bleeding risk. Due to the low number of surgical cases in clinical trials, especially in haemophilia, more information on the clinical practice of CI from observational studies is helpful. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CI with recombinant factor VIII formulated with sucrose (rFVIII‐FS) in a typical surgery practice setting. This was a non‐interventional study in 12 centres. Patients with severe haemophilia A who received rFVIII‐FS by CI during and after surgery were included in this study if they had more than 150 exposure days (EDs) to any FVIII product and had no history of inhibitors before CI. Patients were observed during the entire course of CI, with monitoring up to 3 months thereafter. Twenty‐five patients with 28 surgeries were included in the analysis. Median age was 51.7 (range 10–75). Most (75%; 21/25) patients underwent orthopaedic surgeries. The median dose of rFVIII‐FS consumed during CI was 376 IU kg^?1 (range 157.9–3605.6 IU kg^?1) with a greater median dose for orthopaedic surgeries (424.0 IU kg^?1) compared to non‐orthopaedic surgeries (278.5 IU kg^?1). 95% of all FVIII measurements (214/224) were on target. Efficacy and tolerability were rated as good/excellent in 89.3% (25/28) of surgeries. No inhibitors were observed during or after surgery. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of CI with rFVIII‐FS during surgery in patients with severe haemophilia A in a clinical practice setting.     

In vitro kinetics of factor VIII activity in patients with mild haemophilia A and a discrepancy between one-stage and two-stage factor VIII assay results

In some mild haemophilia A patients (discrepant haemophilia), factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) levels, by one-stage assay are more than double than those by two-stage assay. This may be due to the longer incubation times (10-12 min) in the two-stage assay. This study aimed to determine the time course of the activation phase of the two-stage assay, using both classical coagulation and chromogenic detection methods. In both systems, for equivalent patients (equivalent FVIII:C levels by one-stage and two-stage assays, n = 6, all different mutations), similar FVIII:C results were obtained with short- or long-incubation times. In contrast, plasma from discrepant patients (n = 8, five different mutations) showed higher FVIII:C at shorter incubation times than after longer incubation times. In the chromogenic assay, FVIII:C levels were higher after incubation for 2 min (23-56%, mean 41%) than after 10 min (19-41%, mean 29%). In the classical coagulation assay, FVIII:C levels were higher at shorter incubation times (21-64%, mean 37%) than with the longer incubation times usually used (13-29%, mean 23%). These time-course experiments have verified that the longer incubation time used in the two-stage assay is at least partly responsible for the lower FVIII:C measured by that assay in discrepant haemophilia.     

Experience with Optivate®, a new high purity concentrate of factor VIII with von Willebrand factor,in patients undergoing surgery

Summary. The efficacy and safety of Optivate^® was assessed in 23 surgical operations, orthopaedic (12) including 5 revision arthroplasties, ophthalmic (1), ENT (1), dental (6), liver biopsy (2), and removal of portacath (1) on 15 teenagers and adults with severe haemophilia A. The preoperative dose was calculated to raise the FVIII concentration to 100 IU dL^?1. Subsequent doses were targeted to maintain at least 50 IU dL^?1. There were 11 major and 12 minor operations categorized as receiving intensive replacement therapy for ≥5 days or <5 days respectively. The median preoperative dose was 50.4 (range 18.2–88.2) IU kg^?1. The median incremental recovery based on this first dose in 10 procedures (5 patients) was 2.9 (range 2.4–3.4 IU dL^?1) per IU kg^?1. The daily doses decreased during the first 4 days of the study. The patients in this study received 173 infusions in total. Outcome was ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ for 19 (83%) of 23 operations, ‘uncertain’ in three procedures because an antifibrinolytic agent was used as well and for one procedure outcome was not assessed. Tolerance was good. There were no excessive bleeds, no inhibitors and no virus transmissions.     

Continuous infusion of intermediate-purity factor VIII in haemophilia A patients undergoing elective surgery

An open, non-randomized trial of continuous infusion therapy was conducted involving five patients with severe haemophilia A who required factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis for elective surgery. This was preceded by a 24-h preoperative pharmacokinetic study to characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters of each individual patient following a bolus dose of the intermediate-purity product. A retrospective matched control group was identified to allow for comparisons of FVIII usage between bolus and continuous infusion administration. A loading dose of FVIII was administered preoperatively, and the continuous infusion was started at the end of surgery and continued for 5 days. The patients' FVIII levels, vital signs, and infusion sites were monitored on a daily basis. The clearance was re-calculated on a daily basis using the FVIII activity of that day to adjust the infusion rate to achieve the desired FVIII level. The mean (CV%) pharmacokinetic parameters estimated preoperatively by noncompartmental analysis were: clearance 3.2 mL kg-1 h-1 (35.5%), volume of distribution 52.1 mL kg-1 (40.2%), mean residence time 17.4 h (23.3%), and half-life 12.7 h (23.6%). A progressive decrease in the clearance of FVIII from a mean of 3.1 mL kg-1 h-1 to 2.0 mL kg-1 h-1 (P = 0.125) over the first 5 days was observed. A therapeutically acceptable level of FVIII was systematically achieved, with the only complication being frequent thrombophlebitis. On average the patients used 19% less FVIII when compared with matched historical controls (P = 0.25). This method was found to be safe and effective in haemophilia A patients undergoing elective surgery procedures.     

Immunoprotective effect of von Willebrand factor towards therapeutic factor VIII in experimental haemophilia A

The development of inhibitory anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies in patients with haemophilia A following replacement therapy is associated with several types of risk factors. Among these, the purity of FVIII concentrates, and in particular the presence of von Willebrand factor (VWF), was controversially proposed to influence the immunogenicity of exogenous FVIII. We re-assessed in vivo and in vitro the immuno-protective effect of VWF towards FVIII. The immuno-protective effect of VWF towards FVIII was investigated in vivo, in a model of haemophilia A. We studied the endocytosis of FVIII by murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells and evaluated the capacity of VWF to block the internalization of FVIII. We characterized the relevance of VWF for the accumulation of FVIII in the marginal zone of the spleen, a secondary lymphoid organ where the immune response to therapeutically administered FVIII initiates. Our results confirm that VWF reduces the immunogenicity of FVIII in FVIII-deficient mice. Paradoxically, VWF is important for the accumulation of FVIII in the marginal zone of the spleen. We propose that VWF exerts at least two non-mutually exclusive immunoprotective roles towards FVIII in haemophilic mice: VWF prevents the endocytosis of FVIII by professional antigen-presenting cells by blocking the interaction of FVIII with as yet unidentified endocytic receptor(s). Hypothetically, VWF, by virtue of increasing the half-life of FVIII in the circulation, may allow an increased contact time with tolerogenic marginal zone B cells in the spleen.     

Successful treatment of acute subdural haemorrhage with continuous intravenous infusion of factor VIII in a 17 year old with haemophilia A

Intracranial haemorrhage is a common complication of haemophilia, occurring in 2–8% of sufferers [1]. Half of the cases give a history of trauma and despite developments in the management of acute bleeding the condition still carries a mortality of approximately 30% [2]. Surgery may be required, most commonly for evacuation of a subdural haematoma which carries a mortality of up to 40% [3]. We present the case of a 17-year-old haemophiliac with a traumatic subdural haemorrhage, who was treated with a continuous intravenous infusion of factor VIII and made a complete recovery without recourse to surgery. We have found no reference in the world literature of such treatment for acute subdural haemorrhage in a haemophiliac.     

Inhibitor development in haemophilia A: the role of von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrates

Summary.  The presence of inhibitors that neutralize the function of factor VIII (FVIII) decreases the haemostatic efficacy of replacement clotting factor concentrate and increases morbidity among patients with haemophilia A. Certain genetic and environmental variables have been linked to a higher incidence of inhibitors. Conversely, the presence of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in some plasma-derived FVIII products may provide some measure of protection against inhibitor development, although the evidence is not conclusive. Clinical trials are needed to resolve this issue and determine the appropriate role of VWF-containing FVIII concentrates in the treatment of haemophilia A patients.     

Cross-reactivity to porcine factor VIII of factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia in Australia and New Zealand

Abstract Background: Inhibitory antibodies which neutralise factor VIII develop in 10–20% of individuals with inherited haemophilia A and rarely as autoantibodies in normal individuals to cause acquired haemophilia. The antibodies are directed against human factor VIII but cross-react to varying degrees with porcine factor VIII. Porcine factor VIII can be used for treatment in individuals with low cross-reactivity.
Aims: To determine the cross-reactivity of factor VIII inhibitors between human factor VIII and porcine factor VIII, in a population of patients with inherited and acquired haemophilia A. Also, to determine whether patients with inherited haemophilia and inhibitors have a higher incidence of factor VIII gene inversion in intron 22.
Methods: Samples and data sheets from 43 patients with inherited and ten with acquired haemophilia were submitted from hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Inhibitor levels to human and porcine factor VIII were measured by the Bethesda method in 39 with inherited and nine with acquired haemophilia A.
Results: Of 39 patients with inherited haemophilia A, cross-reactivity was 0% in 17 patients,1–19% in six, 20–39% in 11 and 40–80% in five. In six of nine patients with acquired haemophilia cross-reactivity was 7%. In inherited severe haemophilia A, the frequency of the intron 22 inversion was not greater in 37 study patients than in 28 patients without an inhibitor.
Conclusions: Many patients in Australia and New Zealand with inhibitors to human factor VIII presently show a low or absent level of cross-reactivity to porcine factor VIII. These may respond to treatment with this concentrate at least in the short term. There remains a group of patients with high cross-reactivity who will respond only to recombinant factor Vila or prothrombin complex concentrates.     

Laboratory and clinical markers of HIV infection in a national haemophilia cohort treated with recombinant factor VIII concentrate

Over an interval of approximately six months beginning in October 1993, most haemophilia A patients in Canada were switched from a plasma-derived intermediate-purity factor VIII concentrate (ipVIII) to a recombinant factor VIII (rVIII). In order to determine the consequence of this change in therapy on progression of HIV infection, we gathered surveillance data on clinical status and CD4 and CD8 cell counts in those patients who were HIV seropositive at the time of switching concentrates. Data were recorded at the time of switchover, annually for 2 years thereafter, and retrospectively at a point 1 year prior to the switch. CD4 cells fell significantly over the study period. Multiple direct comparisons revealed that this decline was restricted to the time intervals which included the final year in which patients received intermediate-purity factor VIII concentrate (ipVIII). In the 2 year interval in which rVIII was used exclusively, there was a nonsignificant fall in CD4 cells. Changes in CD4 cells did not correlate with the intensity of exposure to either ipVIII or rVIII. CD8 cells did not fall significantly over the study period. There was no obvious reduction in the incidence of death or clinical progression over the 2 years in which rVIII was used. However, we are hopeful that the stabilizing trend in CD4 cell counts which followed the introduction of rVIII will be predictive of corresponding clinical stabilization over the coming years.     

The safety and efficacy of B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII concentrate in patients with severe haemophilia A

BACKGROUND: B-domain-deleted recombinant factor VIII (BDDrFVIII) was developed when the B-domain was found to be redundant for maintaining haemostasis. This allows formulation of the final product without albumin added as a stabilizer. METHODS: Three multicentre clinical studies and one pharmacokinetic study were conducted in 218 patients to evaluate the safety and haemostatic efficacy of BDDrFVIII. RESULTS: Previously treated patients (n = 113; median duration, 1711 days; median exposure days, 385; total 98,096,287 IU infused) rated 97-99% of all infusions as good or excellent efficacy. FVIII inhibitor was noted in one patient in the previously treated patient cohort after 113 exposure days. Among 101 previously untreated patients, responses to BDDrFVIII were rated as excellent or good in 92-95% of infusions (median duration, 1413 days; median exposure days, 148; total 12,636,458 IU infused). Thirty-two previously untreated patients developed inhibitors after a median duration of 12 exposure days (range, 3-49). Sixteen of 32 (50%) patients had low levels (< or = 5 Bethesda units) and 16 had high levels of inhibitors. Inhibitors disappeared in six of 14 (43%) of the high-level and six of eight (75%) of the low-level patients who underwent immune tolerance induction therapy. A total of 42 patients underwent surgery and the overall efficacy of BDDrFVIII was rated as excellent or good for 99.6% of infusions. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these clinical studies indicate that BBDrFVIII is safe and effective and has haemostatic activity similar to that of full-length FVIII concentrates.     

Intranasal DDAVP induced increases in plasma von Willebrand factor alter the pharmacokinetics of high-purity factor VIII concentrates in severe haemophilia A patients

Because native circulating factor VIII (FVIII) is maximally stabilized when it is bound to von Willebrand factor (vWf), increased plasma vWf levels may enhance the infused FVIII concentrate intravascular survival and efficacy in severe haemophiliacs. To assess whether the kinetic characteristics and recovery of high purity, plasma-derived (Monoclate-P, Centeon) and recombinant (Bioclate , Centeon) FVIII concentrates are enhanced by increased plasma vWf concentrations, we compared the pharmacokinetic response to a bolus of FVIII infused alone with the response to a bolus infused 2 h after the intranasal delivery of 300 microg of desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) High Concentration Nasal Spray (Stimate, Centeon) in 10 adult severe haemophiliacs. FVIII activity was determined using a one-stage clotting assay on cryopreserved plasma specimens obtained at baseline and at 14 distinct time points (0.25-48 h) following the FVIII infusions. Ristocetin co-factor activity (RCoFA) and vWf antigen levels were assayed at baseline and 2 h after Stimate. FVIII kinetic parameters were calculated using standard, noncompartmental kinetic methods. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test with 95% confidence limits. The mean rises in RCoFA (0.65+/-0.44 IU mL(-1)) and vWf antigen (0.19+/-0.07 IU mL-1) induced by Stimate were significant (P<0.01 and P<0.0001, respectively). The mean increases in the volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) (13.2+/-9.3 dL) and mean residence time (MRT) (4.4+/-3.9 h) between the FVIII-only arm and the FVIII plus Stimate arm were highly significant (P = 0.0015 and P = 0. 0059, respectively). The mean differences in recovery, area under the curve (AUC), half-life, and clearance (Cl) were not significantly altered. Subgroup analysis revealed statistically significant increases in Vss and MRT (P = 0.025 and P = 0.012, respectively) following the administration of intranasal DDAVP in the Monoclate-P cohort, but not in the Bioclate group. These data suggest that even modest pharmacologically induced increases in plasma vWf can favourably affect the kinetics of high-purity, plasma-derived FVIII concentrates in severe haemophiliacs.