Imaging Prostate Cancer: An Update on Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Prostate cancer is a common cancer in men and continues to be a major health problem. Imaging plays an essential role in the clinical management of patients. An important goal for prostate cancer imaging is more accurate disease characterization through the synthesis of anatomic, functional, and molecular imaging information. Developments in imaging technologies, specifically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), have improved the detection rate of prostate cancer. MRI has improved lesion detection and local staging. Furthermore, MRI allows functional assessment with techniques such as diffusion-weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The most common PET radiotracer, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose, is not very useful in prostate cancer. However, in recent years other PET tracers have improved the accuracy of PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer. Among these, choline (labeled with ¹⁸F or ¹¹C), ¹¹C-acetate, and ¹⁸F-fluoride have demonstrated promising results, and other new radiopharmaceuticals are currently under evaluation in preclinical and clinical studies.     

Application of 11C‐acetate positron‐emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer: systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature

• To review the literature on the application of ¹¹C‐acetate positron‐emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer.

• We systematically reviewed the available literature and presented the results in meta‐analysis format.
• PubMed, SCOPUS, ISI web of knowledge, Science Direct, Springer, and Google Scholar were searched with ‘Acetate AND PET AND Prostate’ as keywords.
• All studies that evaluated accuracy of ¹¹C‐acetate imaging in primary or recurrent prostate cancer were included, if enough data could be extracted for calculation of sensitivity and/or specificity.

• In all, 23 studies were included in the study. For evaluation of primary tumour, pooled sensitivity was 75.1 (69.8–79.8)% and specificity was 75.8 (72.4–78.9)%.
• For detection of recurrence, sensitivity was 64 (59–69)% and specificity was 93 (83–98)%. Sensitivity for recurrence detection was higher in post‐surgical vs post‐radiotherapy patients and in patients with PSA at relapse of >1 ng/mL.
• Studies using PET/computed tomography vs PET also showed higher sensitivity for detection of recurrence.

• Imaging with ¹¹C‐acetate PET can be useful in patients with prostate cancer. This is especially true for evaluation of patients at PSA relapse, although the sensitivity is overall low.
• For primary tumour evaluation (localisation of tumour in the prostate and differentiation of malignant from benign lesions), ¹¹C‐acetate is of limited value due to low sensitivity and specificity.
• Due to the poor quality of the included studies, the results should be interpreted with caution and further high‐quality studies are needed.

     

Peritoneal recurrence of colon cancer detected by positron emission tomography: Report of a case

Increased glucose metabolism has been reported to occur in association with colorectal cancer. As positron emission tomography (PET) using [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose is able to depict hypermetabolic sites, it can therefore be used to detect colorectal cancer. A 69-year-old male patient with a recurrent solitary liver metastasis from colon cancer underwent whole-body PET which revealed high [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the lesion. Furthermore, PET revealed peritoneal metastases that had not been detected by conventional imaging methods. Consequently, PET proved useful in helping us to avoid performing unnecessary treatment for the liver metastasis. Although it is uncertain whether early identification of recurrence can prolong survival, it may help to prevent unnecessary treatments being carried out. Thus, the application of PET in carefully selected patients could be beneficial to the management of recurrent colorectal cancer.     

Clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: our experience and a review of the literature

Aim The aims of the present study were: (i) to evaluate the focal incidental colorectal uptake of ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) and to correlate it with colonoscopy and histological findings; (ii) to evaluate the relationship between the presence/absence of neoplastic disease and clinical data and the anatomical site of [¹⁸F]FDG uptake; and (iii) to compare our results with those reported for incidental colorectal uptake of [¹⁸F]FDG in the literature and those obtained from various screening programmes for colorectal cancer. Method The database of 6000 patients referred for [¹⁸F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET‐CT) to our centre was retrospectively reviewed for incidental colorectal uptake of [¹⁸F]FDG. Patients with focal uptake were selected and the aetiology of PET findings was verified with a subsequent colonoscopy and histopathological analysis when available. Results Incidental colorectal uptake of [¹⁸F]FDG was seen in 144 (2.4%) patients, of whom 64 (1.1%) had focal uptake; 48 out of these 64 patients underwent colonoscopy, which showed malignant tumours in 12 (25%), premalignant lesions in 19 (40%), non‐neoplastic lesions in six (12%) and lesions not confirmed by colonoscopy in 11 (23%). Our data agreed with previously published data. Statistical analysis did not show any significant relationship between the presence/absence of neoplastic disease and patient sex or age, type of primary disease and anatomical site of [¹⁸F]FDG uptake. Comparing our data with various screening programmes, a significant difference was found only with series in which colonoscopy was performed in patients at high risk for colorectal cancer. Conclusion Focal incidental colorectal uptake of [¹⁸F]FDG is observed in about 1% of PET/CT studies and carries a high risk of neoplastic disease. A PET‐CT report should suggest colonoscopy when abnormal findings are reported.     

The value of 18F‐FDG PET/CT in diagnosing and localising deep sternal wound infection to guide surgical debridement

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a severe complication in patients after open heart surgery (OHS). But there is a lack of appropriate imaging tool to detect the infection sites, which may lead to incomplete debridement. The present study aims to investigate the value of ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F‐FDG PET/CT) in comparison with CT scan in diagnosing and localising DSWI. A total of 102 patients with DSWI after OHS were retrospectively collected from January 2012 to December 2017 in our hospital. All the patients had surgical debridements for DSWI with pretreatment imaging of either ¹⁸F‐FDG PET/CT or CT scan. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of localising infection sites were compared between PET/CT and CT groups, with surgical, microbiological, and histopathological findings as the gold standard. The length of hospital stays and the rate of recurrence were also compared. Ten patients in the PET/CT group had a follow‐up PET/CT scan after debridement, and the correlations between the changes of PET/CT findings and surgical outcomes were analysed. ¹⁸F‐FDG PET/CT is more accurate than CT in diagnosing and localising DSWI after OHS, which leads to a more successful surgical debridement with a lower rate of recurrence and a shorter length of hospital stay. In addition, follow‐up PET/CT after debridement could evaluate the treatment effect.     

[<Superscript>11</Superscript>C]choline PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Objective  

To evaluate [¹¹C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([¹¹C]choline PET/CT) for the detection of a biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.     

Positron Emission Tomography in Clinical Islet Transplantation

The fate of islets in clinical transplantation is unclear. To elude on this positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed for 60 min during islet transplantation in five patients receiving six transplants. A fraction of the islets (23%) were labeled with 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) and carefully mixed with unlabeled islets just prior to intraportal transplantation. The peak radioactivity concentration in the liver was found at 19 min after start of islet infusion and corresponded to only 75% of what was expected, indicating that islets are lost during the transplantation procedure. No accumulation of radioactivity was found in the lungs. A nonphysiological peak of C‐peptide was found in plasma during and immediately after transplantation in all subjects. Distribution in the liver was heterogeneous with wide variations in location and concentration. Islets found in areas with concentrations of >400 IEQ/cc liver tissue varied between 1% and 32% of the graft in different subjects. No side effects attributed to the PET/CT procedure were found. Clinical outcome in all patients was comparable to that previously observed indicating that the [¹⁸F]FDG labeling procedure did not harm the islets. The technique has potential to be used to assess approaches to enhance islet survival and engraftment in clinical transplantation.     

[18F]‐fluorocholine positron‐emission/computed tomography for lymph node staging of patients with prostate cancer: preliminary results of a prospective study

Study Type – Diagnostic (case series)
Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate prospectively [¹⁸F]‐fluorocholine positron‐emission/computed tomography (FCH PET/CT) for lymph node staging of prostate cancer before intended curative therapy, and to determine whether imaging 15 or 60 min after radiotracer injection is preferable.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 25 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (Gleason score >6, and/or a prostate‐specific antigen level of >10 ng/mL, and/or T3 cancer) were scanned before lymphadenectomy. Each patient was assessed twice with imaging, at 15 and 60 min after the injection with FCH. Images were compared with the results of histopathological examination of the surgically removed lymph nodes. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) at 15 and 60 min were also compared.

RESULTS

Histopathologically, metastases were present in removed lymph nodes from three patients. FCH PET/CT showed a high radiotracer uptake in four patients, the former three and a fourth. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of FCH PET/CT for patient based lymph node staging of prostate cancer were 100%, 95%, 75% and 100%, respectively; the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were 29.2–100%, 77.2–99.9%, 19.4–99.4% and 83.9–100%, respectively. Values of SUV_max at early and late imaging were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

This small series supports the use of FCH PET/CT as a tool for lymph node staging of patients with prostate cancer. Values of SUV_max at early and late imaging did not differ. However, larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.     

Correlation between mechanical stress by finite element analysis and 18F‐fluoride PET uptake in hip osteoarthritis patients

¹⁸F‐fluoride positron emission tomography (¹⁸F‐fluoride PET) is a functional imaging modality used primarily to detect increased bone metabolism. Increased ¹⁸F‐fluoride PET uptake suggests an association between increased bone metabolism and load stress at the subchondral level. This study therefore examined the relationship between equivalent stress distribution calculated by finite element analysis and ¹⁸F‐fluoride PET uptake in patients with hip osteoarthritis. The study examined 34 hips of 17 patients who presented to our clinic with hip pain, and were diagnosed with osteoarthritis or pre‐osteoarthritis. The hips with trauma, infection, or bone metastasis of cancer were excluded. Three‐dimensional models of each hip were created from computed tomography data to calculate the maximum equivalent stress by finite element analysis, which was compared with the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) examined by ¹⁸F‐fluoride PET. The SUV_max and equivalent stress were correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ρ = 0.752), and higher equivalent stress values were noted in higher SUV_max patients. The correlation between SUV_max and maximum equivalent stress in osteoarthritic hips suggests the possibility that ¹⁸F‐fluoride PET detect increased bone metabolism at sites of stress concentration. This study demonstrates the correlation between mechanical stress and bone remodeling acceleration in hip osteoarthritis. © 2014 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:78–83, 2015.     

Imaging of prostate cancer with PET/CT and radioactively labeled choline derivates

PET- and PET/CT using [¹¹C]- and [¹⁸F]-labeled choline derivates are increasingly being used for imaging of prostate cancer. The value of PET- and PET/CT with [¹¹C]- and [¹⁸F]-labeled choline derivates in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer has been examined in many studies and demonstrates an increasing importance. PET/CT, in comparison to PET, improves especially the lesion localization as well as characterization. Primary prostate cancer can be detected with moderate sensitivity using PET and PET/CT using [¹¹C]- and [¹⁸F]-labeled choline derivates—the differentiation between benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is not always possible. At the present time, [¹¹C]-choline PET/CT is not recommended in the primary setting but may be utilized in clinically suspected prostate cancer with repeatedly negative prostate biopsies, in preparation of a focused re-biopsy. Promising results have been obtained for the use of PET and PET/CT with [¹¹C]- and [¹⁸F]-labeled choline derivates in patients with biochemical recurrence. The detection rate of choline PET and PET/CT for local, regional, and distant recurrence in patients with a biochemical recurrence shows a linear correlation with PSA value at the time of imaging and reaches about 75% in patients with PSA > 3 ng/ml. Even at PSA values below 1 ng/ml, the recurrence can be diagnosed with choline PET/CT in approximately one-third of the patients. PET and PET/CT with [¹¹C]- and [¹⁸F]-choline derivates can be helpful in the clinical setting for choosing a therapeutic strategy in the sense of an individualized treatment: an early diagnosis of recurrence is crucial to the choice of optimal treatment. Especially important for the choice of treatment is the exact localization of the site of recurrence: local recurrence, recurrence as lymph node metastasis, or systemic recurrence, as it has direct influence on individual therapy. This article reviews the use of PET and PET/CT with [¹¹C]- and [¹⁸F]-labeled choline derivates in prostate cancer imaging with special emphasis on patients with biochemical recurrence. We briefly provide an overview of PET tracers for prostate cancer imaging, the rationale of using choline derivatives for prostate cancer imaging and discuss the contribution of choline PET/CT in patients suffering from prostate cancer with an emphasis on recurrent disease. Furthermore, we provide an outlook on future prospects of choline PET/CT imaging for therapy guidance and monitoring in the framework of therapy individualization.     

Histological verification of 11C-choline-positron emission/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in patients with biochemical failure after treatment for localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the potential of ¹¹C‐choline‐positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for planning surgery in patients with prostate cancer and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) relapse after treatment with curative intent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 10 patients with PSA recurrence after either external beam radiation (two) or radical retropubic prostatectomy (eight) for prostate cancer, and who had a laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for suspicious lymph nodes detected on ¹¹C‐choline‐PET/CT. The histological results and PET/CT findings were compared.

RESULTS

In all, 22 suspicious lymph nodes were found on PET/CT, and 14 on conventional CT or magnetic resonance imaging. Comparing the conventional imaging showed concordance in 13 lymph nodes. Three of the 10 patients had no metastatic lymph node disease on definitive histology. The mean (sd ) PSA level for these patients was 1.0 (0.4) ng/mL, whereas that in patients with lymph node metastases was 15.1 (9.2) ng/mL (statistically significant difference, P < 0.05). The positive predictive value was seven of 10. All of the patients initially regressed, with PSA increases after lymphadenectomy. Two of the patients are being managed by watchful waiting, two had radiotherapy of the prostate fossa and two had chemotherapy with docetaxel. Four patients were treated by hormone‐deprivation therapy. After a mean (sd ) follow up of 11 (7) months, one patient died, one has PSA progression, but none of those with negative histology has clinical signs of local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

¹¹C‐choline‐PET is a valuable tool for detecting recurrent prostate cancer, but the limited positive predictive value should lead to a critical interpretation of the results.     

18F‐FDG‐PET/CT predicts early tumor recurrence in living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

The prognosis including ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F‐FDG‐PET/CT) for the early recurrence for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was not well established. Consecutive patients who underwent ¹⁸F‐FDG‐PET/CT and subsequent LDLT for HCC from March 2005 to June 2011 were enrolled. The 191 patients with a median follow‐up of 26.1 months were evaluated. There were 20 patients (10.5%) with early recurrence (≤6 months), 18 patients (9.4%) with late recurrence (>6 months), and 153 patients (80.1%) with no recurrence. Fifty‐five patients (28.8%) displayed increased PET/CT tumor uptake. Three‐year overall and disease‐free survival for PET/CT‐positive patients were 65.5% and 57.1%, respectively, while PET/CT‐negative patients showed respective values of 89.8% and 86.8% (P = 0.001 vs. P < 0.001). Tumor variables associated with PET/CT‐positive finding were preoperative AFP level, Milan, UCSF criteria, maximum tumor size, total tumor size, differentiation, vascular invasion, and serosal invasion. PET/CT‐positive status was identified as an independent prognostic factor for disease‐free survival influencing early recurrence in multivariable analysis (HR 3.945, 95% CI 1.196–13.016, P = 0.024). ¹⁸F‐FDG‐PET/CT is an independent and significant predictor of early tumor recurrence in LDLT for HCC.     

Funktionelle Bildgebung beim Harnblasenkarzinom

Computed tomography (CT) represents the current standard imaging modality in muscle invasive bladder cancer; however, local tumor and lymph node staging is often impaired. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted sequences, determination of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values or utilization of supraparamagnetic iron nanoparticles potentially exhibits advantages in the assessment of local tumor and lymph node involvement and therefore might play a role in the staging of bladder tumor in the future. Likewise, positron emission tomography (PET) with the currently used tracers ¹⁸F fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG), ¹¹C-choline and ¹¹C-acetate is being investigated in bladder cancer patients, mostly in combination with diagnostic CT. Although promising results could be obtained for PET/CT investigations to some extent, the true value cannot be determined at present.     

Combined 18F‐fluorocholine and 18F‐fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for staging of high‐risk prostate cancer

Study Type – Diagnosis (cohort) Level of Evidence 2a What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with choline and fluoride for the detection of metastases in patients with prostate cancer have each been evaluated, with mixed results. Choline PET/CT has been evaluated against pelvic lymphadenectomy, generally with a low sensitivity but a high specificity; however, the study populations have been heterogenous. Fluoride PET/CT has been evaluated against other imaging methods, such as bone scan, single photon emission CT and MRI, and has been shown to have high specificity as well as sensitivity for bone metastases, but there are no studies with biopsy verification. This is the first study that evaluates the clinical use of both choline and fluoride PET/CT on the same patients in a well‐defined population of patients with high‐risk prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To investigate how often positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, with both ¹⁸F‐fluorocholine and ¹⁸F‐fluoride as markers, add clinically relevant information for patients with prostate cancer who have high‐risk tumours and a normal or inconclusive planar bone scan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Patients with prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels between 20 and 99 ng/mL and/or Gleason score 8–10 tumours, planned for treatment with curative intent based on routine staging with a negative or inconclusive bone scan, were further investigated with a ¹⁸F‐fluorocholine and a ¹⁸F‐fluoride PET/CT.
• ? None of the patients received hormonal therapy before the staging procedures were completed.

RESULTS

• ? For 50 of the 90 included patients (56%) one or both PET/CT scans indicated metastases.
• ? ¹⁸F‐fluorocholine PET/CT indicated lymph node metastases and/or bone metastases in 35 patients (39%).
• ? ¹⁸F‐fluoride PET/CT was suggestive for bone metastases in 37 patients (41%).
• ? In 18 patients (20%) the PET/CT scans indicated widespread metastases, leading to a change in therapy intent from curative to non‐curative.
• ? Of the patients with positive scans, 74% had Gleason score 8–10 tumours. Of the patients with Gleason score 8–10 tumours, 64% had positive scans.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? PET/CT scans with ¹⁸F‐fluorocholine and ¹⁸F‐fluoride commonly detect metastases in patients with high‐risk prostate cancer and a negative or inconclusive bone scan.
• ? For 20% of the patients the results of the PET/CT scans changed the treatment plan.

     

Role of PET/CT in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

The purpose of this study covered the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients through previously published literature. Through 30 September, 2019, the PubMed database was searched for eligible articles that evaluated PET/CT imaging in bladder cancer patients. In general, FDG PET/CT, the most commonly used PET/CT imaging, does not show good performance for the detection of primary lesions; however, according to the literature it could accurately assess pelvic lymph node (LN) status better than other imaging technologies and it was especially helpful in determining extra-pelvic recurrences. More recently, non-FDG PET/CT imaging, such as C-11 acetate and C-11 choline, has been introduced. Although further research is required, preliminary results show the potential of these techniques to overcome the drawbacks of FDG. This concise study will overview the role of PET/CT when treating muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).     

C11 choline PET/CT succeeds when conventional imaging for primary hyperparathyroidism fails

BackgroundFocused parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism is possible with accurate preoperative localization. A growing body of data exists regarding the role of radio-labeled C¹¹ choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. In cases of nonlocalized disease, it may be a useful adjunct to ultrasound, (123)I/(99)Tc-sestamibi (I-123 sestamibi), or 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging.MethodsPatients who received a neck and chest limited coverage C¹¹ choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of primary hyperparathyroidism from 2017 to 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed the sensitivity, positive predictive value, and false negative rate. We also compared these rates to the standard modalities of ultrasound, I-123 sestamibi, 4-dimensional computed tomography, and examined concordance rates.ResultsWe identified 43 patients, of whom 33 had a positive C¹¹ choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography finding. This cohort of patients had failed to localize on multiple standard imaging modalities. Twenty-five patients proceeded to surgery, 72% of whom were reoperative cases. Twenty (80%) achieved an intraoperative cure. Analysis showed that C¹¹ choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography achieved a sensitivity of 64% (95% confidence interval 47%–82%) and positive predictive value of 72% (95% confidence interval 54%–90%). There were 5/25 (20%) false positive positron emission tomography C¹¹ choline results found to be lymph nodes, normal parathyroid, and 1 recurrent laryngeal nerve neuroma.ConclusionC¹¹ choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography is a useful adjunct for parathyroid localization in a complex population of patients who have failed standard localization techniques including ultrasound, I-123 sestamibi, or 4-dimensional computed tomography and/or prior operations. Although routine inclusion of C¹¹ choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging may not be necessary, it may aid in preoperative localization in the reoperative setting.     

Value of [11C]choline-positron emission tomography for re-staging prostate cancer: a comparison with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography

PURPOSE: We compared [11C]choline-positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET for re-staging prostate cancer in a group of 100 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients referred for whole body [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET for clinical prostate re-staging after radical treatment for prostate cancer were retrospectively included in the study. Mean prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 6.57 ng./ml. In all cases [11C]choline-PET was also performed. PET studies were done with a multiring device 5 minutes after intravenous injection of approximately 370 MBq. [11C]choline and 60 minutes after injection of approximately 370 MBq. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. PET findings were compared with those obtained with different conventional imaging and with PSA assessed at the time of PET and 1 year later. RESULTS: Areas of abnormal focal increases were noted in 47% of patients on [11C]choline-PET and in 27% on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET. Of the 100 patients 49 had positive conventional imaging findings. All except 14 [11C]choline-PET findings were concordant with conventional imaging, including 6 negative and 8 positive conventional imaging results. All except 1 [11C]choline-PET negative cases also had negative conventional imaging after 1 year. PSA at 1 year remained stable or decreased in 80% and 62% of [11C]choline-PET negative and positive cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: [11C]choline-PET seems to be useful for re-staging prostatectomy cases with increasing serum PSA levels. It is superior to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET and complementary to conventional imaging but with the advantage of staging disease at a single step.     

PET and prostate cancer

The diagnosis of prostate cancer leaves some questions without answers. The different diagnostic techniques are limited in three situations: (1) staging of the tumour: identification of node involvement, (2) quantification of the tumour volume and its location inside the gland, (3) premature identification of relapse after radical treatment. These are the three problems that we need to consider in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma. Imaging techniques can tell us the morphological alterations in the structures and organs. Positron emission tomography (PET) introduces a new way of identifying damage by counting metabolic activity. The tracers are substances that are marked with a radioactive molecule that is picked up more readily by the tumours. The presence of these substances in a set anatomic zone means higher consumption and therefore more metabolic activity. The radiotracer most frequently used in PET is glucose marked with fluoride 18. The first studies with marked glucose and prostate tumours started at the end of the 1990s. There are many contradictions in the results of these studies due to renal elimination, which produces an accumulation in the urinary tract and does not correctly show the prostate zone and iliobturator nodes area, and its capitation by zones with inflammatory process or prostatic hyperplasia. Choline is a substance that is present in cellular membranes. When it is marked with carbon 11, it changes to a new tracer. This radiotracer has affinity with prostate damage and allows the better differentiation of malignant from benign processes. It also has the advantage of the absence of renal elimination. Trials that used choline marked with carbon 11 (11C choline) are beginning to obtain very promising results. This union of a method that identifies metabolic activity with an imaging technique increases the sensitivity in the diagnostic test and can help find the exact location of the 11C choline deposits. The PET-CT combines the PET with computerised tomography. The 11C choline PET-CT is presented as a promising technique for answering the three problems mentioned above.     

Detection of incidental colorectal tumours with 18F‐labelled 2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans: results of a prospective study

Aim This study assessed the clinical significance of incidental colorectal 2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake using ¹⁸F‐FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans and evaluated the importance of colonoscopy when incidental colorectal FDG uptake was observed. Method A prospective study was designed and conducted at a single institution over a 2‐year period. In patients undergoing PET/CT scans, all with FDG uptake in the colorectum were assigned to have colonoscopy and biopsy. The value of PET/CT scanning was studied by comparison with the colonoscopy and biopsy results. Results Among 10 978 PET/CT scans, one or more focal uptakes of FDG in the colorectum were observed in 148 (1.35%) patients. In 136 valid patients, malignant colorectal tumours and polyps were found in 23.5% and 20.5%, respectively,, while the colon in the other 56% was normal. A higher false‐positive rate was found in the right colon compared with the distal colorectum (66.2%vs 36.7%, P = 0.004). A significant increase of the maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value was found among normal, polyps and cancer groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that SUVmax was the risk factor for predicting colorectal cancer or polyps and FDG uptake in the right colon was a negative predictive factor for finding cancers or polyps. Conclusions Our study proves the necessity of colonoscopy when incidental FDG uptake is found on PET/CT imaging. The false‐positive FDG uptake is more commonly observed in the right colon. Although the SUVmax value is higher in cancer patients, a high SUVmax value does not necessarily result in malignancies.     

Clinical value of whole body fluorine‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of metastatic bladder cancer

Objectives: To investigate the value of whole‐body fluorine‐18 2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of metastatic bladder cancer. Methods: From December 2006 to August 2010, 60 bladder cancer patients (median age 60.5 years old, range 32–96) underwent whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by performing both organ‐based and patient‐based analyses. Identified lesions were further studied by biopsy or clinically followed for at least 6 months. Results: One hundred and thirty‐four suspicious lesions were identified. Among them, 4 primary cancers (2 pancreatic cancers, 1 colonic and 1 nasopharyngeal cancer) were incidentally detected, and the patients could be treated on time. For the remaining 130 lesions, positron emission tomography/computed tomography detected 118 true positive lesions (sensitivity = 95.9%). On the patient‐based analysis, the overall sensitivity and specificity resulted to be 87.1% and 89.7%, respectively. There was no difference of sensitivity and specificity in patients with or without adjuvant treatment in terms of detection of metastatic sites by positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Compared with conventional imaging modality, positron emission tomography/computed tomography correctly changed the management in 15 patients (25.0%). Conclusions: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography has excellent sensitivity and specificity in the detection of metastatic bladder cancer and it provides additional diagnostic information compared to standard imaging techniques.