64层螺旋CTA与DSA在颈内动脉狭窄研究中的应用

目的探讨64层螺旋CTA与DSA在颈内动脉狭窄的临床应用价值。方法收集临床拟诊为前循环缺血发作的患者203例,进行64层螺旋CTA检查,其中97例患者同时行DSA检查,并将CTA与DSA结果相对照,计算出二者之间的敏感性和特异性。结果本组行CTA检查的203例患者中有181例患者颈内动脉有不同程度的狭窄,97例行DSA检查的患者颈内的动脉均有不同程度的狭窄,CTA与DSA的敏感性和特异性为100%。结论64层螺旋CTA能够清晰地显示颈内动脉系统的异常,在某些方面上可替代DSA检查。     

3.0T高分辨率CE-MRA对颈部血管狭窄的诊断价值

目的探讨三维对比增强磁共振血管成像(3D CE-MRA)在颈部动脉血管狭窄诊断中的临床应用价值。方法对23例临床拟诊颈部动脉血管狭窄行数字减影血管造影(DSA)的患者行颈部3D CE-MRA。将两种方法检查结果进行相关性比较。结果 23例患者共230个节段血管,3D CE-MRA显示了227个节段,共诊断出74处(32.6%)狭窄,其中28处轻度狭窄,22处中度狭窄,20处重度狭窄,4处闭塞;DSA共显示了230个节段的血管,共诊断出69处(30.4%)血管狭窄,其中24处轻度狭窄,23处中度狭窄,19处重度狭窄,3处闭塞。与DSA相比,3DCE-MRA对颈部动脉轻度、中度、重度狭窄及动脉闭塞的显示敏感性均为100%,特异性分别为85.71%、90.91%、90%和75%,两种检查方法对颈部动脉狭窄程度的判断有良好的一致性(κ=0.921,P=0.000)。结论 3.0T 3DCE-MRA能够可靠的评价颈部动脉狭窄性病变,基本可以替代DSA检查。     

3.0T时间飞跃法MRA诊断颅内动脉瘤-与DSA对照

目的评价3.0T时间飞跃法磁共振血管成像(3.0TTOFMRA)对颅内动脉瘤的诊断价值。方法对34例临床提示颅内动脉瘤患者前瞻性行3.0TTOFMRA及脑血管DSA检查。所有图像由3名医师分成2组在工作站上进行读片。第1组由2名高年资神经影像组医师分别独立阅读重建的最大密度投影(MIP)图像;第2组由1名高年资神经影像组医师同时阅读MIP和原始数据图像(sourceimage)。以DSA诊断结果作为标准,评价3.0TTOFMRA诊断颅内动脉瘤的灵敏度、特异度及正确率。结果DSA共检测20枚动脉瘤(19例),其中颈内动脉7例,前交通动脉5例,后交通动脉5例,大脑前、中动脉各1例。TOFMRA总体诊断灵敏度、特异度、正确率分别为94.8%、89.4%和91.4%。第2组的诊断有效性最高,两组间诊断阳性率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.242,P>0.05和χ2=0.172,P>0.05)。结论3.0TTOFMRA作为一种快速、无创的影像检查方法,能够很好显示颅内动脉瘤。MIP结合Source图像可提高3.0TTOFMRA诊断的准确性。     

3D TRICKS MRA对颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄的诊断价值

目的：探讨3D TRICKS MRA对颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄的诊断价值。方法：对43例临床疑诊颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄的患者行2D TOF MRA和3D TRICKS MRA检查,其中31例同期行DSA检查,以颈总动脉法（CC法）计算狭窄率。结果：颈动脉闭塞2支,重度狭窄10支,中度狭窄31支,轻度狭窄25支,正常18支。2D TOF MRA、3D TRICKS MRA与DSA对照,显示狭窄部位均与DSA所示相符。2D TOF MRA高估狭窄程度6支,3D TRICKS MRA高估狭窄程度1支。以DSA为标准,2D TOF MRA诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、诊断符合率分别为91.6%,85.7%,90.3%（K=0.737）;3D TRICKS MRA诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、诊断符合率分别为97.9%,100%,98.4%（K=0.955）。两种方法对诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度和诊断符合率差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：3D TRICKS MRA与DSA对评估颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄具有极好的一致性（K=0.955）,明显优于2D TOF MRA（K=0.737,P〈0.05）,是对颈动脉粥样硬化狭窄筛查、术前评估、术后随访的最佳检查方法,能基本替代DSA检查。     

症状性颅、颈部动脉狭窄在3.0T上的MRA与DSA比较研究

目的前瞻性分析3．0T应用SENSE技术的高分辨率对比增强容积扫描MRA（CEMRA）和3DTOFMRA在临床疑有颅、颈部动脉狭窄性病变患者中的应用价值。方法46例临床怀疑颅、颈部动脉狭窄的患者接受头颅MRI平扫、头颅3DTOFMRA和颈部CEMRA检查。动脉狭窄的程度与DSA检查结果进行相关性比较。结果MRA显示各段颅、颈部动脉狭窄的不同程度和DSA检查显著相关（Rs=0．97,P〈0．01）。以DSA结果为金标准,狭窄程度超过50％者MRA诊断灵敏度为100％,特异度为99．4％、准确率为99．4％。结论3．0T的3DTOFMRA和高分辨率CEMRA检查能可靠和有效地评价颅、颈部动脉狭窄性病变,可作为DSA术前必要的检查技术,或可替代传统DSA诊断性检查。     

TCD和CDFI联合检测对椎-基底动脉狭窄的诊断价值

目的将通过经颅多普勒超声（TCD）和彩色多普勒血流显像（CDFI）联合检测诊断的椎-基底动脉狭窄患者的检测资料进行分析,并与数字减影血管造影（DSA）做对比研究,客观评价二者对椎-基底动脉狭窄的诊断价值。方法经TCD、CDFI诊断的椎-基底动脉狭窄患者38例,均进一步行磁共振血管造影（MRA）、DSA检测,对比分析其检测结果。结果与DSA比较,TCD、CDFI对椎动脉的检测敏感性为83%,特异性为91%;TCD对基底动脉狭窄检测的敏感性为75%,特异性为93%。以DSA为标准,TCD对基底动脉近段、中段、远段的检出率分别为100%、50%和33%。以DSA为标准,TCD＋CDFI对椎-基底动脉狭窄的检出率为79%,MRA的检出率为96%,TCD、CDFI、MRA三者联合检出率为98%。结论①TCD、CDFI对椎-基底动脉狭窄的特异性较高,且无创、经济、方便,故可作为首选筛查手段。但因其敏感性不是很高,故当临床出现后循环神经缺失症状,而检测结果阴性时,可结合MRA检查;②TCD、CDFI、MRA三者联合对VBA狭窄有较好的准确性。     

16层CT血管造影在诊断烟雾病中的应用价值

目的：探讨16层CT血管造影（16SCTA）在诊断烟雾病中的应用价值。方法23例烟雾病患者均行16层CT平扫和16SCTA检查,图像后处理采用多平面重组（MPR）、容积再现（VR）和最大密度投影（MIP）。其中5例同时行数字减影血管造影（DSA）检查。结果16层CT平扫显示脑梗死8例,脑出血7例,脑出血合并脑梗死6例,脑实质未见异常2例。16SCTA均清晰显示发生狭窄、闭塞的颈内动脉、Willis环血管近侧端,以及明显增多、扩张的脑底部侧支血管影,其中双侧颈内动脉闭塞8例,单侧大脑中动脉闭塞13例,单侧颈内动脉闭塞伴同侧大脑后动脉狭窄2例。侧支血管表现为相应血管及其分支的粗大、增多、迂曲。5例DSA表现与16SCTA结果一致。结论16SCTA可以清晰显示烟雾病病变血管的特点,检查方法简单、快捷,可为临床诊疗提供重要的诊断依据。     

Renal artery stenosis: Comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in detecting renal artery stenosis using intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with possible renovascular hypertension were prospectively studied; 26 of them underwent both MRA and DSA. In these 26 cases, two readers assessed the number of renal arteries, the presence of stenoses and their degree. Results were compared with DSA, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of MRA were determined. Interobserver variability was also calculated. RESULTS: DSA showed 51 main renal arteries (one patient had a single kidney) and six accessory arteries (total number of arteries 57) in the 26 patients considered. Both MRA readers detected all of the 51 main renal arteries and only one accessory vessel. When the presence of stenosis was considered, the readers' results, respectively, were as follows: sensitivity 77% and 72%, specificity 69% and 69%, PPV 86% and 85%, NPV 55% and 50% and diagnostic accuracy 75% and 71%. When the detection of significant stenosis was considered, the results, respectively, were: sensitivity 83% and 83%, specificity 73% and 78%, PPV 60% and 65%, NPV 90% and 91%, and diagnostic accuracy 76% and 80%. Interobserver variation was good when considering stenosis detection (kappa=0.69) and excellent when considering detection of significant stenosis (kappa=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: MRA results do not appear as positive as in the majority of papers in the literature. Multiple reasons can probably be invoked to explain this difference. The mean age of our patients, higher than in many other studies, should be noted and may have accounted for their possible poor cooperation. Moreover, all of the missed significant stenoses were distally located, and therefore, the failure to detect them might be related to the suboptimal spatial resolution of MRA. Nevertheless, MRA showed a high NPV for detecting significant stenoses, a finding of considerable clinical relevance in that it allows patients with normal MRA findings to be spared additional more invasive procedures.     

对比剂增强的磁共振血管成像技术对比数字减影血管造影在颈部动脉诊断中的应用

目的：回顾性分析透视触发对化剂增强的磁共振血管成像（CE-MRA）技术对颈部血管的应用,与数字减影血管造影（DSA）对比,探讨其敏感性及应用价值。方法收集2011-2012年经MRA检查患者中临床表现有脑供血异常,疑颅内、颈内动脉或椎动脉狭窄、均进行透视触发CE-MRA和DSA检查的病例资料共28例进行分析。结果 CE-MRA检出狭窄部位30处,其中狭窄程度50％以上14处,完全闭塞6处,50％以下10处。 DSA检出狭窄部位28处,其中狭窄程度50％以上8处,完全闭塞4处,50％以下16处。2处MRA疑轻度狭窄,DSA未见异常;2处MRA示完全闭塞（颈内动脉）,而DSA示狭窄率90％以上。结论透视触发CE-MRA简便易行,敏感性与特异性均较高,可以作为可疑颈部及颅内动脉狭窄患者的首选检查方法。     

Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in a time-resolved technique compared with digital subtraction angiography (x-ray DSA) in patients with suspected stenoses of the internal carotid artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent selective x-ray DSA involving a total of 84 carotid arteries. CE-MRA was performed in a time-resolved technique with a fast gradient-echo sequence on a 1.5 T MR scanner: TR 3.8 milliseconds, TE 1.49 milliseconds. Four consecutive measurements, each a duration of 10 seconds, were performed with omission of measuring bolus transit time. Four independent radiologists scored the degree of stenosis. The interobserver variability was calculated for CE-MRA and x-ray DSA. RESULTS: In the 43 cases, at least one MRA measurement showed arterial contrast without venous degradation. Compared with x-ray DSA the mean sensitivity and specificity for grading stenosis > or = 70% were 98% and 86%, respectively. The interobserver agreement was substantial with no significant difference between CE-MRA (kappa value 0.794) and x-ray DSA (kappa value 0.786). CONCLUSIONS: The short acquisition time of a fast CE-MRA sequence allows a selective visualization of the internal carotid arteries without degradation from venous enhancement. It is a reliable method with a good interobserver agreement.     

Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of neck vessels: does dephasing effect alter diagnostic accuracy?

The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRA (CEMRA) compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in studying neck vessels of 48 patients. In three groups of patients, we used three MRA protocols differing for voxel size to assess if intravoxel dephasing effects could modify accuracy of CEMRA. Accuracy and correlation with DSA results were calculated in all patients and separately in the three groups. A qualitative analysis of the likeness between morphology of the stenosis in CEMRA and DSA images was also assessed. In all patients accuracy and agreement with DSA were 96% and k=0.85 in subclavian arteries, 96% and k=0.84 in vertebral artery, 97% and k=0.88 in common carotid arteries, and 94% and k=0.86 in internal carotid arteries. In the three groups accuracy and agreement with DSA did not show any significant difference. Qualitative analysis of CEMRA and DSA images revealed a better agreement in depicting the morphology of stenosis using a smaller voxel size. The CEMRA represents a powerful tool for the non-invasive evaluation of neck vessels. Overestimation trend of CEMRA is confirmed and the reduction of voxel size, decreasing the dephasing intravoxel effect, allows to have a better overlapping of stenosis morphology on CEMRA compared with DSA, but it does not yield diagnostic gain in the stenosis grading. Electronic Publication     

MR和CT血管造影在诊断颈动脉狭窄及内膜切除术后随访中的价值

目的 探讨磁共振血管造影（MRA）、CT血管造影（CTA）在诊断颈动脉狭窄及内膜切除术后随访中的价值。方法 11例22支颈动脉行MRA、CTA、CT仿真内窥镜（CTVE）、多普勒超声（DUS）检查。12支结果与DSA对照。3支颈动脉重度狭窄者行内膜切除术,MRA采用二维、三维时间飞越法。CTA经最大强度投影（MIP）及遮盖表现显示法（SSD）三维重建。应用导航功能行CTVE成像。结果 颈动脉轻度狭窄8支,中度狭窄3支,重度狭窄5支,闭塞1支,5支正常。12支颈动脉与DSA对照：CTA评估血管狭窄与DSA相符者11支,MRA与DSA相符者9支,DUS与DSA相符者7支。CTA、CTVE显示斑块、壁血栓6支,3支手术证实。术后MRA示狭窄解除,CTA示斑块消失。结论 MRA、DUS可用于颈动脉狭窄的筛选及术后随访。CTA评估血管狭窄程度与DSA、手术比较有较好的一致性,并能直接显示钙化斑块。     

Actual role of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (mra tof 3d) in the study of stenosis and occlusion of extracranial carotid artery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of MRA (3D TOF) in comparison to contrast-enhanced MRA using DSA as the gold standard in the study of steno-occlusive disease of the internal carotid artery, in order to determine if this technique still has a diagnostic value. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiologists blindly and independently evaluated either the unenhanced MRA, CE MRA, or DSA images of 23 consecutive patients, assessing the stenosis based on a NASCET five-class classification. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CE MRA and unenhanced MRA were 100% and 100%, 100% and 95.5% and 100% and 93.2%, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced MRA should be still considered a valid alternative for studying the extracranial section of the internal carotid arteries especially in patients who refuse or whose laboratory results exclude the use of contrast medium or in patients in whom continuous monitoring of a clinical condition is required but a repeated and/or frequent use of contrast medium is not possible.     

Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography

Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) is a non-invasive alternative to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). CE MRA is increasingly used as a complement to Duplex in the preoperative assessment of carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to determine if CE MRA could replace preoperative DSA. CE MRA with a scan time of 10 or 28 s was performed in 24 consecutive patients who were scheduled for preoperative DSA because of Duplex-verified severe carotid artery stenosis. Two neuroradiologists measured the degree of stenosis with three different methods, and the image quality was evaluated. DSA was used as the gold standard. For detection of severe stenosis (N. American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (NASCET) > or =70%; European symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (ECST) > or =80%; common carotid artery method (CCAM) > or =80%), the sensitivity of CE MRA maximum intensity projection (MIP) compared with DSA was 82%-100 %, the specificity was 74%-93% and the accuracy was 77%-90%. The inter-observer agreement was higher, the image quality was better and the intracranial main arteries were better visualized with the 28 s than with the 10 s scan time. The enhancement of the jugular veins seen in 17% of the 10 s scans and in 58% of the patients with the 28 s scans did not interfere with the evaluation of the carotid arteries. CE MRA, preferably with a scan time of 28 s, can replace DSA in the preoperative assessment of most patients with carotid artery stenosis.     

三维对比剂增强MR血管成像对颈部动脉病变的诊断价值

目的　分析三维对比剂增强MR血管成像 (3DCE MRA)显示的颈部动脉常见病变 ;与DSA比较 ,明确 3DCE MRA诊断颈部动脉病变的价值。方法　对 741例超声多普勒怀疑颈部动脉疾病的患者进行 3DCE MRA成像 ,并根据其病变表现总结分类。 2 0 6例病人同时行DSA检查 ,将颈部动脉分为颈总、颈内、颈外、锁骨下及椎动脉 5个部位 ,由 2位放射学专家独立评估DSA及 3DCE MRA血管资料。结果　 3 6 7%病例 (2 72 / 741)显示无异常。 63 2 9% (469/ 741)显示颈部动脉有病变 ,共计 82 7段 ,其中动脉粥样斑块占 3 4 2 2 % (2 83段 ) ,动脉狭窄占 3 4 46% (2 85段 ) ,动脉闭塞占 3 3 8% (2 8段 ) ,动脉发育纤细占 14 87% (12 3段 ) ;动脉开口变异占 3 87% (3 2段 ) ,动脉扭曲占 3 63 % (3 0段 ) ,动脉瘤占 0 72 % (6段 ) ,动脉夹层占 1 2 1% (10段 ) ,肿瘤包绕或推压动脉占 1 45% (12段 ) ,术后复查占2 18% (18段 )。对 2 0 6例的 412段血管与DSA比较 ,3DCE MRA在颈总动脉、颈内动脉及椎动脉的阳性检出率差异有显著性意义 (P <0 0 1) ,主要是对动脉粥样斑块 (2 56段与 2 83段 )和动脉狭窄 (2 58段与 2 85段 )存在一定的高估。但对 412段血管整个样本 ,两种方法在同一部位诊断各种血管病变差异无显著性意义 (P >0 0     

Non-invasive assessment of neck-vessel pathology

Clinical trials (NASCET, ECTS) have shown that carotid endarterectomy is protective against stroke in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. To decrease costs and risks, new diagnostic tools have been developed, such as duplex ultrasound (DUS), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and more recently computed tomography angiography (CTA). CTA and MRA provide excellent 3D angiography images of the extracranial vessels, using a volume-rendering technique. Digitally subtracted MRA (DSA-MRA) obtained with high-speed acquisitions during gadolinium injection has also recently become available. These techniques are changing the role of non-invasive assessment of carotid stenosis. Although it is probably too early to assess a definite diagnostic algorithm, the use of DSA as a pre-surgical tool for defining carotid stenosis is rapidly decreasing. Received: 9 February 1998; Accepted: 13 February 1998     

颅颈部动脉狭窄的增强 MRA与DSA比较研究

目的 评价椭圆形中心K空间编码增强（CE）MRA在颅颈部动脉狭窄性疾病的诊断价值.方法 48例根据临床症状怀疑有颅颈部动脉狭窄患者接受了CE MRA和DSA检查.MRA图像采用MIP、MPR方法重建,范围包含从主动脉弓部到Willis 环的所有的血管.以DSA为标准,MRA和DSA结果通过统计相关系数比较.结果 以是否狭窄为评判点时,MRA和DSA在各段颅颈部动脉取得较好的一致性.以狭窄程度超过70%为评判点时,MRA和DSA在颈动脉部位取得相当高的一致性.CE MRA显示椎-基底动脉,颈动脉终末段,颅内血管方面稍差.结论 椭圆形中心K空间编码CE MRA能有效地筛选出颅颈部动脉狭窄性病变.在颅外颈动脉部位可使大部分患者免于接受DSA检查.在诊断椎-基底动脉,颈动脉终末段,颅内血管狭窄方面的准确度不够,不能替代传统DSA检查.     

MR-Angiographie der supraaortalen Gefäße

PURPOSE: To compare high resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the assessment of supraaortic vessel stenosis. METHODS: 14 patients with suspicion of cerebrovascular disease or upper limb ischemia underwent selective DSA and high resolution contrast enhanced MRA employing a new Panoramic-Array coil. Stenosis assessment in comparison to DSA followed NASCET criteria. Additionally signal-/noise ratios (SNR) were evaluated to assess contrast enhancement. RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was achieved in all patients. Sensitivity and specificity for assessing high-grade stenosis of the supraaortic vessels were 100% and 96% respectively. In the assessment of high-grade common or internal carotid artery stenosis sensitivity and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSION: High resolution contrast enhanced supraaortic MRA combined with new coil systems allow for a reliable assessment of stenoses along the whole vessel course including the aortic arch. Previous stent procedures limit its use in postinterventional follow-up.     

透视触发3D CE MRA与DSA在颈部动脉狭窄诊断中的比较研究

目的 通过与DSA对照,探讨透视触发3DCE MRA在颈部动脉狭窄诊断中应用价值。方法 回顾性分析60例经DSA确诊的颈部动脉狭窄患者的3DCE MRA影像资料,以血管狭窄部位、数目及程度等作为分析指标,由两位放射科医师进行比较分析。结果 60例患者中3DCE MRA共发现狭窄血管126处,其中轻度49处,中度41处,重度29处,闭塞7处。DSA诊断相应部位血管狭窄124处,其中轻度狭窄49处、中度狭窄40处、重度狭窄29处、闭塞6处;3DCE MRA与DSA对颈部动脉狭窄的诊断结果的一致性较好。结论 透视触发3DCE MRA能够清晰显示颈部动脉狭窄性病变情况,具有广泛的临床应用价值,可基本替代诊断性DSA。     

Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis

The aim of this study was to compare image quality, level of diagnostic confidence and interobserver agreement in assessment of carotid stenosis with contrast enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in comparison with 2D time of flight MR angiography (2D TOF MRA). 60 carotid arteries in 30 patients were examined by three observers. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were assessed on the basis of a visual analogue scale. Interobserver variability was assessed with the help of intraclass correlation coefficient. Median values on the visual analogue scale for image quality and diagnostic confidence were higher for CE MRA compared with 2D TOF MRA for all three observers. Higher intraclass correlation values were recorded for interobserver variability for CE MRA compared with 2D TOF MRA both for visual estimation of carotid stenosis as well as for measurement of carotid stenosis on the basis of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria. CE MRA provides better image quality, higher level of diagnostic confidence and more interobserver agreement compared with 2D TOF MRA.