Simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesions using different energy levels of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-arc therapy

Objective:

This study compared the dosimetry of volumetric-arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a dynamic multileaf collimator using the Monte Carlo algorithm in the treatment of prostate cancer with and without simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) at different energy levels.

Methods:

The data of 15 biopsy-proven prostate cancer patients were evaluated. The prescribed dose was 78 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV78) including the prostate and seminal vesicles and 86 Gy (PTV86) in 39 fractions to the intraprostatic lesion, which was delineated by MRI or MR-spectroscopy.

Results:

PTV dose homogeneity was better for IMRT than VMAT at all energy levels for both PTV78 and PTV86. Lower rectum doses (V₃₀–V₅₀) were significantly higher with SIB compared with PTV78 plans in both IMRT and VMAT plans at all energy levels. The bladder doses at high dose level (V₆₀–V₈₀) were significantly higher in IMRT plans with SIB at all energy levels compared with PTV78 plans, but no significant difference was observed in VMAT plans. VMAT plans resulted in a significant decrease in the mean monitor units (MUs) for 6, 10, and 15 MV energy levels both in plans with and those without SIB.

Conclusion:

Dose escalation to intraprostatic lesions with 86 Gy is safe without causing serious increase in organs at risk (OARs) doses. VMAT is advantageous in sparing OARs and requiring less MU than IMRT.

Advances in knowledge:

VMAT with SIB to intraprostatic lesion is a feasible method in treating prostate cancer. Additionally, no dosimetric advantage of higher energy is observed.Randomized trials have shown a gain in biochemical relapse-free survival using dose escalation for prostate cancer.¹ However, isolated local failure is still reported in nearly one-third of patients, even with higher radiotherapy (RT) doses.¹ Local recurrence is of clinical importance because a relationship has been suggested between local control, distant metastasis and survival.² It has also been demonstrated that intraprostatic failure mainly originates at the initial tumour location as a result of intrinsic resistance of a fraction of the tumour clones, which implies that selective dose escalation to the dominant intraprostatic lesion using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) might be beneficial.³With new RT techniques, such as intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric-arc therapy (VMAT), SIB could be delivered without increasing acute toxicity.^4–7 Several recent studies have performed dosimetric comparison of IMRT and VMAT plans in prostate cancer;^8–10 however, dosimetric evaluation of IMRT and VMAT plans delivering SIB is rare. In these studies, target volume and organs at risk (OARs) doses may vary with different treatment planning systems. Another aspect not often addressed in these planning studies is the photon energy level.^4,8,9,11 Although higher energy photons have the potential advantage of reduced attenuation with depth, this may in turn increase the risk of secondary malignancies because of the presence of neutrons generated in the accelerator head at treatment energies >8 MV.¹²Functional imaging techniques can clearly demonstrate tumour within the prostate. MRI, MR spectroscopy (MRS) and positron emission tomography are capable of demonstrating intraprostatic lesions (IPLs).¹³ The advent of combined MRI with MRS or dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI improves the detection rate of tumours within the prostate.^13–15The aim of the present study was to make dosimetric comparisons of VMAT and 7-field IMRT with dynamic multileaf collimators (MLCs) using the Monte Carlo algorithm with XVMC code in the treatment of prostate cancer with or without SIB, which can provide improved dose calculation accuracy and has been implemented successfully in the clinical setting.^16,17 Additionally, the impact of three photon energies on target volumes, OARs and normal tissue was evaluated in IMRT and VMAT plans.     

A dosimetric comparison of RapidArc and IMRT with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate for treatment of prostate cancer

Objective:

To compare the dosimetric results and treatment delivery efficiency among RapidArc® (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), 7-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (7-f IMRT) and 9-field IMRT (9-f IMRT) with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate.

Methods:

RapidArc, 7-f IMRT and 9-f IMRT plans were created for 21 consecutive patients treated for high-risk prostate cancer using the Eclipse™ treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems). All plans were designed to deliver 70.0 Gy in 28 fractions to the prostate planning target volume (PTV) while simultaneously delivering 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the pelvic nodal PTV. Target coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were compared across techniques. The total number of monitor units (MUs) and the treatment time were used to assess treatment delivery efficiency.

Results:

RapidArc resulted in slightly superior conformity and homogeneity of prostate PTV, whereas all plans were comparable with respect to dose to the nodal PTV. Although OARs sparing for RapidArc and 7-f IMRT plans were almost equivalent, 9-f IMRT achieved better sparing of the rectum and bladder than RapidArc and 7-f IMRT. RapidArc provided the highest treatment delivery efficiency with the lowest MUs and shortest treatment time.

Conclusion:

RapidArc resulted in similar OAR sparing to 7-f IMRT, whereas 9-f IMRT provided the best OAR sparing. Treatment delivery efficiency is significantly higher for RapidArc.

Advances in knowledge:

This study validated the feasibility and limitations of RapidArc in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer with complex pelvic target volumes.Radiotherapy has played an important role in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. Several randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that high-dose radiotherapy improves prostate-specific antigen control, and a recently published meta-analysis [1] showed that high-dose radiotherapy is superior to conventional-dose radiotherapy in preventing biochemical or clinical failure and prostate cancer-specific death. However, dose escalation has been limited by toxicity in conventional techniques. Therefore, prostate cancer is one of the most common tumour sites treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which enables the delivery of highly conformal dose distribution to the target while reducing the dose to critical organs. IMRT also has the ability to produce inhomogeneous dose distribution, which allows for simultaneous differential dose delivery to multiple tumour targets (simultaneous integrated boost). Despite the obvious benefits of IMRT, there are some disadvantages. The potential downsides of IMRT include the increased time required for radiotherapy delivery and increased monitor units (MUs) needed compared with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a relatively new rotational radiation therapy technique based on the idea of delivering IMRT with continuous dynamic modulation of the dose rate, field aperture and gantry speed. Compared with IMRT, the potential benefit of VMAT is the increase in delivery efficiency, including a shorter treatment time and a lower number of MUs.Several recent studies have compared VMAT with IMRT for prostate radiotherapy [2–13]. Although shortened treatment time is a common finding, there are inconsistencies in the dosimetric outcome. Many studies considering relatively simple target volumes that included prostate only or prostate with seminal vesicles found that VMAT achieved equal or better normal tissue sparing over IMRT [2,3,5,6,8–10,12]. However, very few studies have focused on more complex pelvic target volumes, including the prostate, seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes [4,7,11,13]. Some of these studies found largely equivalent sparing of organs at risk (OARs) between VMAT and IMRT [7,13]. However, other planning studies have reported contradictory results. Yoo et al [4] noted superior OARs sparing with IMRT to VMAT. Myrehaug et al [11] found VMAT to have no consistent dosimetric advantage over IMRT. Thus, those studies have yielded mixed results. Our study aims to expand such studies to quantitatively evaluate VMAT for prostate cancer cases with complex pelvic target volumes and simultaneous integrated boost techniques.RapidArc® is one of the VMAT techniques implementing the progressive resolution optimisation algorithm in the Eclipse™ planning system by Varian Medical Systems (Palo Alto, CA). In the present study, we compare the performance of RapidArc, 7-field IMRT (7-f IMRT) and 9-field IMRT (9-f IMRT) with hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. This study focused on the evaluation of the dosimetric results and treatment delivery efficiency.     

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnostic performance of 64-section multiphase CT enterography and CT angiography compared with capsule endoscopy

Objective:

To compare the diagnostic capabilities between capsule endoscopy (CE) and multislice CT (MSCT) enterography in combination with MSCT angiography for assessment of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).

Methods:

A total of 127 patients with OGIB were looked at in this study. 82 patients (aged 42.7 ± 19.1 years; 34 males) were assigned to receive MSCT diagnosis and 67 patients to (aged 53.9 ± 16.2 years; 28 males) receive CE diagnosis. Among them, 22 patients (aged 54.1 ± 19.1 years; 12 males) received both examinations. Oral isotonic mannitol and intramuscular injection of anisodamine were performed; non-ionic contrast (iopromide, 370 mg I ml⁻¹) was intravenously administered; and then multiphase scanning was conducted at arterial, small intestinal and portal venous phases in MSCT. The results were compared with findings of reference standards including double balloon enteroscopy, digital subtraction angiography, intraoperative pathological examination and/or clinical diagnosis.

Results:

Administration of anisodamine markedly increased the satisfaction rate of bowel filling (94.67% vs 28.57%; p < 0.001) but not the diagnostic yield (p = 0.293) of MSCT. Compared with MSCT, CE showed an improved overall diagnostic yield (68.66% vs 47.56%; p = 0.010), which was also observed in overt bleeding patients (i.e. patients with continued passage of visible blood) (76.19% vs 51.02%; p = 0.013) and in patients aged younger than 40 years of age (85% vs 51.28%; p = 0.024). However, CE had similar positive rates to MSCT (p > 0.05). Among the 22 cases in whom both examinations were conducted, CE showed no significantly different diagnostic capability compared with MSCT (p = 0.4597).

Conclusion:

Both CE and MSCT are safe and effective diagnostic methods for OGIB.

Advances in knowledge:

CE is preferred for overt bleeding or patients aged younger than 40 years. The combined use of CE and MSCT is recommended in OGIB diagnosis.Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), which accounts for approximately 5% of all gastrointestinal haemorrhage cases,¹ is defined as persistent or recurring gastrointestinal bleeding without an obvious aetiology after gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.^2,3 Based on the presence or absence of clinically evident bleeding, OGIB could be divided into occult (no visible blood) and overt (continued passage of visible blood, such as haematemesis, melaena or haematochezia) bleeding.^3,4 OGIB frequently occurs in the small bowel and is caused by small bowel diseases such as intestinal erosions, ulcers, vascular anomaly, gastrointestinal tumours and inflammatory bowel and parasitic diseases.^5,6Multiple diagnostic techniques have been developed to elucidate the causes of OGIB. Among them, two non-invasive technologies, capsule endoscopy (CE) and multislice CT (MSCT) markedly improved the ability to determine the causes of OGIB by allowing the visualization of the gastrointestinal tract.^2,3,6 CE is able to obtain direct visualization of mucosal surface of the entire small intestine.^4,7,8 However, capsule retention remains a major risk of CE diagnosis.^4,9–11 In addition, the visual field restriction limits the value of CE in diagnosis of umbilicate or extraluminal lesions, since the small bowel is difficult to evaluate owing to its large length and tortuous course.^4,10 Conversely, MSCT, including MSCT angiography (MSCTA), MSCT enteroclysis and MSCT enterography (MSCTE), has full capacity to depict the extraintestinal lesions, owing to the combination of the advantages of enteral volume challenge with the ability of cross-sectional imaging.^4,12 Yet, substantial patient radiation exposure is one of the major disadvantages of MSCT diagnosis.^3,13 Careful preparation is also needed before examination.¹⁴ Considering that both CE and MSCT have advantages and disadvantages, a limited number of published data have compared the two diagnostic tools in patients with OGIB.^4,6,15–17 However, most of these studies did not refer to MSCTA, and apparently different results were obtained owing to the advancement of the two technologies. Thus, an updated and comprehensive comparison is required.Hence, we compared the diagnostic capability of MSCTE in combination with MSCTA with CE in patients suffering from OGIB. In this study, MSCTE and MSCTA technologies performed with a 64-slice spiral CT scanner were combined by non-contrast-enhanced scanning after oral administration of a neutral enteric contrast material (isotonic mannitol, 2.5%) and the intramuscular injection of anisodamine to restrain enterocinesia, and the following multiphase scanning at arterial, small intestinal and portal venous phases followed the intravenous infusion of non-ionic iodinated contrast material (iopromide, 370 mg I ml⁻¹). In addition, the influences of the clinical bleeding pattern and age on the diagnostic capability were also investigated.     

A dosimetric analysis of volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy with jaw width restriction vs 7 field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for definitive treatment of cervical cancer

Objective:

Radiation therapy treatment planning was performed to compare the dosimetric difference between volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (RapidArc™ v. 10; Varian® Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and 7-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (7f-IMRT) in the definitive treatment of cervical cancer.

Methods:

13 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. Planning target volume (PTV) 50 and PTV60 were prescribed at a dose of 50 and 60 Gy in 28 fractions, respectively. The dose to the PTV60 was delivered as a simultaneous integrated boost to the pelvic lymph nodes. Owing to the mechanical limitation of the multileaf collimator in which the maximum displacement was limited to 15 cm, two types of RapidArc with different jaw width restrictions (15 and 20–23 cm) were investigated to evaluate their dosimetric differences. The RapidArc plan type with dosimetric superiority was then compared against the 7f-IMRT on the target coverage, sparing of the organs at risk (OARs), monitor units, treatment time and delivery accuracy to determine whether RapidArc is beneficial for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Results:

The 15-cm jaw width restriction had better performance compared with the restrictions that were longer than 15 cm in the sparing of the OARs. The 15-cm RapidArc spared the OARs, that is, the bladder, rectum, small intestine, femoral heads and bones, and improved treatment efficiency compared with 7f-IMRT. Both techniques delivered a high quality-assurance passing rate (>90%) according to the Γ_3mm,3% criterion.

Conclusion:

RapidArc with a 15-cm jaw width restriction spares the OARs and improves treatment efficiency in cervical cancer compared with 7f-IMRT.

Advances in knowledge:

This study describes the dosimetric superiority of RapidArc with a 15-cm jaw width restriction and explores the feasibility of using RapidArc for the definitive treatment of cervical cancer.Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc™ v. 10; Varian® Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) is a novel type of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in which the gantry speed, multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf position, and dose rate (DR) can vary simultaneously during delivery.¹ Compared with traditional IMRT, RapidArc is able to reduce treatment time and number of monitor units (MUs) while improving the dose to organs at risk (OARs) and healthy tissue sparing. It does this while producing similar or even better dose distributions.² Therefore, RapidArc has been widely applied in the treatment of various cancers, such as larynx carcinoma,³ peripheral lung tumour,⁴ nasopharyngeal carcinoma,^5,6 hepatocellular carcinoma,⁷ spinal metastases,⁸ total marrow irradiation,⁹ prostate cancer,¹⁰ cervical cancer^11–13 and so on. The feasibility of RapidArc has been confirmed by many studies. However, no one has reported the influence of jaw width on the dose distribution, especially for the OARs. Only Vieillot et al¹⁴ had described that the RapidArc field size should be minimized to 15 cm in the x direction, although they did not perform additional experiments to confirm whether the 15-cm field size restriction was actually more beneficial than larger restriction sizes. Owing to the mechanical limitation, the maximum leaf span of the MLC is 15 cm. When the field size is set to <15 cm, anywhere inside the field can be moderated by both sides of the MLC and this permits a higher degree of freedom for the MLC modulation to achieve better optimization results. Otherwise, when the field size is >15 cm, some areas in the field can only be reached by one side of the MLC, which may prohibit achieving better modulation for the treatment plans. Therefore, the dosimetric effect of different jaw widths needs to be further investigated.Two previous studies reported that RapidArc produced significant improvements in the coverage of the target, sparing the OARs and reducing the treatment time for cervical cancer compared with 5-field (5f)-IMRT.^11,12 However, it is still difficult to conclude that RapidArc is superior to IMRT in the treatment of cervical cancer. Because 5f-IMRT is not able to offer good conformity for the target, and taking 5f-IMRT as the benchmark is not sufficient to demonstrate the dosimetric superiority of RapidArc. The two studies were not consistent regarding the sparing of the bladder and rectum. Whether RapidArc achieves better sparing of the two organs than IMRT is still unknown. Moreover, only post-operative patients were enrolled in the two studies, and no simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique was used.Because cervical tumours are usually surrounded by many organs, such as the bladder, rectum, bones, femoral heads and the small intestine, it is an ideal model to study the effect of jaw width on the dose distribution and the sparing of the OARs. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the dosimetric benefit of 15-cm RapidArc in the definitive treatment of cervical cancer with SIB to the pelvic lymph nodes that required an additional 10–15 Gy of radiation.¹⁵ We also aimed to compare the 15-cm RapidArc dose distribution and the sparing of the OARs with that of 7-field (7f)-IMRT. Although 9-field (9f)-IMRT was reported to produce improved dose distribution for cervical cancer compared with 7f-IMRT,¹⁶ it required longer treatment time and was not treatment efficient. Thus 7f-IMRT was used as a benchmark in this research. We hope that in addition to clarifying the effect of jaw width, our study will help to determine whether RapidArc is truly beneficial in the treatment of cervical cancer.     

Quality assurance of dynamic parameters in volumetric modulated arc therapy

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate quality assurance checks for accuracy of gantry speed and position, dose rate and multileaf collimator (MLC) speed and position for a volumetric modulated arc treatment (VMAT) modality (Synergy® S; Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden), and to check that all the necessary variables and parameters were synchronous.

Methods

Three tests (for gantry position–dose delivery synchronisation, gantry speed–dose delivery synchronisation and MLC leaf speed and positions) were performed.

Results

The average error in gantry position was 0.5° and the average difference was 3 MU for a linear and a parabolic relationship between gantry position and delivered dose. In the third part of this test (sawtooth variation), the maximum difference was 9.3 MU, with a gantry position difference of 1.2°. In the sweeping field method test, a linear relationship was observed between recorded doses and distance from the central axis, as expected. In the open field method, errors were encountered at the beginning and at the end of the delivery arc, termed the “beginning” and “end” errors. For MLC position verification, the maximum error was −2.46 mm and the mean error was 0.0153 ±0.4668 mm, and 3.4% of leaves analysed showed errors of >±1 mm.

Conclusion

This experiment demonstrates that the variables and parameters of the Synergy® S are synchronous and that the system is suitable for delivering VMAT using a dynamic MLC.The concept of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been described in many studies [1-5]. VMAT is a system for intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment (IMRT) delivery that achieves high dose conformity by optimising the dose rate, gantry speed and leaf positions of the dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) [6]. One study [5] demonstrated quality assurance (QA) checks using dynamic MLC controller log files (Dynalog) for VMAT systems such as RapidArc® (Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA). It is assumed that the actual delivery process is truly represented in the log files [6]. The major disadvantage of this method is that Dynalog files need to be validated against an independent system. The electronic portal imaging device (EPID) is a dependable system when corrections are made for systematic tilts and shifts [7,8] and when image sagging due to gantry angle [9] has been taken into account. A significant number of researchers have investigated MLC QA by film or EPID [7-13] to measure the accuracy of the MLC controller independently and ensure that the MLC edge positions agree with the radiation field edges to within 0.3 mm [14]. EPID measurements are highly reproducible, with a standard deviation of <0.1 mm for individual leaf/collimator positions and <0.05 mm for a 10×10 cm² field [7]. Few studies [15-17] have demonstrated commissioning, QA and patient-specific QA for VMAT using both the RapidArc and the Synergy® S (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) systems. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate QA checks for accuracy of gantry speed and position, dose rate, MLC leaf speed and MLC position, and to ensure that all the necessary variables and parameters were synchronous. These simple tests were designed to fulfil the requirements and limits recommended by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) for the clinical implementation of IMRT [18] and a recent recommendation by AAPM task group 142 (TG-142) [19] for the QA of medical accelerators.     

Advantage of 3D volumetric dosemeter in delivery quality assurance of dynamic arc therapy: comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo calculations

Objective:

To evaluate the accuracy of pencil beam calculation (PBC) and Monte Carlo calculation (MCC) for dynamic arc therapy (DAT) in a cylindrically shaped homogenous phantom, by comparing the two plans with an ion chamber, a film and a three-dimensional (3D) volumetric dosemeter.

Methods:

For this study, an in-house phantom was constructed, and the PBC and MCC plans for DAT were performed using iPlan® RT (BrainLAB®, Heimstetten, Germany). The A16 micro ion chamber (Standard Imaging, Middleton, WI), Gafchromic® EBT2 film (International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ) and ArcCHECK™ (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) were used for measurements. For comparison with each plan, two-dimensional (2D) and 3D gamma analyses were performed using 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria.

Results:

The difference between the PBC and MCC plans using 2D and 3D gamma analyses was found to be 7.85% and 28.8%, respectively. The ion chamber and 2D dose distribution measurements did not exhibit this difference revealed by the comparison between the PBC and MCC plans. However, the 3D assessment showed a significant difference between the PBC and MCC (62.7% for PBC vs 93.4% for MCC, p = 0.034).

Conclusion:

Evaluation using a 3D volumetric dosemeter can be clinically useful for delivery quality assurance (QA), and the MCC should be used to achieve the most reliable dose calculation for DAT.

Advances in knowledge:

(1) The DAT plan calculated using the PBC has a limitation in the calculation methods, and a 3D volumetric dosemeter was found to be an adequate tool for delivery QA of DAT. (2) The MCC was superior to PBC in terms of the accuracy in dose calculation for DAT even in the homogenous condition.Over the past few years, there has been a considerable growth in interest concerning arc therapy. This includes a range of techniques, such as dynamic arc therapy (DAT), intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT), helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).^1–3 These developments have been accompanied by the improvement of dose calculation algorithms and a significant increase in treatment efficiency, thus resulting in shorter treatment times and a smaller number of monitor units (MUs) than with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and other conventional methods.Existing arc therapy planning methods, such as pencil beam calculation (PBC), are based on dividing the full rotation angle by a uniform control point and then optimizing the results.^4,5 Only the dose calculation based on a control point below a certain angle has been previously reported to be an accurate dose delivery to the target area.^4,6–8 However, the errors from approximating the arc with individual beams could occur in the area where adjacent beams do not overlap.⁹ This area could be wide when the phantom size is large or when the field or target size is small. Compared with PBC, Monte Carlo calculation (MCC) has made accurate dose calculations possible because the accuracy of the dose calculation using MCC depends on the number of simulation histories rather than the number of beams.^9,10 Whether the PBC or the MCC plan is used, the radiation that is actually delivered remains the same.Several studies on the accuracy of PBC and MCC for DAT did not show that these errors can result when dividing the arc, and only focused on the errors that occur in the inhomogeneous condition. Chow et al⁹ compared the PBC, collapsed cone convolution (CCC) and MCC for DAT using both homogenous and inhomogeneous phantoms. For homogenous phantoms, the measured dose of the PBC and CCC agreed well (approximately 2% dose error) with predictions made using the MCC. However, in the dose distribution in the phantom with lung inhomogeneity, only MCC agreed with the measurements within 2%, whereas PBC and CCC underestimated or overestimated the dose inside the lung. Petoukhova et al¹⁰ also compared the PBC with MCC for homogenous and inhomogeneous phantoms using conformal radiotherapy, IMRT, and DAT. They also concluded that the PBC and MCC results agreed well with the measured dose for homogenous phantoms, but not for inhomogeneous phantoms. In these studies, they only measured the delivered dose using an ion chamber, film or two-dimensional (2D) diode array detector.The absolute dose measurement using an ion chamber is a target-centred dose evaluation method, and the 2D dose distribution measurement is limited to the range that can be measured because the dose distribution is only assessed on one side during rotating irradiation.^11,12 Recently, a variety of three-dimensional (3D) volumetric dosemeters have been developed and commercialized to overcome these limitations. Representative examples include the Delta^4™ phantom (ScandiDos®, Uppsala, Sweden) and ArcCHECK^™ (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) dosimetry systems. The accuracy and advantage of these new measurement instruments have already been evaluated.^13–19In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of the PBC and MCC for DAT by comparing the PBC with MCC plans and by measuring the delivered dose using an ion chamber, a film and a 3D volumetric diode array detector. We used a homogenous phantom to focus on the errors in the PBC which result from dividing the arc and calculating each beam.     

Femoral neck shaft angle width is associated with hip-fracture risk in males but not independently of femoral neck bone density

Objective:

To investigate the specificity of the neck shaft angle (NSA) to predict hip fracture in males.

Methods:

We consecutively studied 228 males without fracture and 38 with hip fracture. A further 49 males with spine fracture were studied to evaluate the specificity of NSA for hip-fracture prediction. Femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (FN-BMD), NSA, hip axis length and FN diameter (FND) were measured in each subject by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Between-mean differences in the studied variables were tested by the unpaired t-test. The ability of NSA to predict hip fracture was tested by logistic regression.

Results:

Compared with controls, FN-BMD (p < 0.01) was significantly lower in both groups of males with fractures, whereas FND (p < 0.01) and NSA (p = 0.05) were higher only in the hip-fracture group. A significant inverse correlation (p < 0.01) was found between NSA and FN-BMD. By age-, height- and weight-corrected logistic regression, none of the tested geometric parameters, separately considered from FN-BMD, entered the best model to predict spine fracture, whereas NSA (p < 0.03) predicted hip fracture together with age (p < 0.001). When forced into the regression, FN-BMD (p < 0.001) became the only fracture predictor to enter the best model to predict both fracture types.

Conclusion:

NSA is associated with hip-fracture risk in males but is not independent of FN-BMD.

Advances in knowledge:

The lack of ability of NSA to predict hip fracture in males independent of FN-BMD should depend on its inverse correlation with FN-BMD by capturing, as the strongest fracture predictor, some of the effects of NSA on the hip fracture. Conversely, NSA in females does not correlate with FN-BMD but independently predicts hip fractures.Hip fracture is the worst osteoporotic fracture with regard to cost^1,2 and adverse consequences,^3,4 so its prevention by checking for the related fracture risk factors is an important goal. Although low bone mineral density (BMD) is generally recognized as the main risk factor for hip fracture,^5,6 there is growing evidence that other bone characteristics, such as proximal femur geometry (PFG) parameters, are implicated in determining the risk profile for hip fracture.^7,8 This evidence, however, mainly derives from studies carried out in females,^9–13 whereas contradictory results characterize studies carried out in males.^14–20 Authors'' opinions seem to vary widely about the ability of the neck shaft angle (NSA), one of the PFG factors, to predict osteoporotic hip fractures in males,^14–16,21 whereas its association with the risk of hip fracture in females^10,11,14,22 is generally accepted. Gender differences in the hip anatomy²³ have been put forward as a possible explanation for the different relationship of NSA with the hip-fracture risk between genders, whereas geographic and racial differences²⁴ among the examined male populations have been advocated as a possible cause of authors'' discrepancies on the relationship between NSA and the hip-fracture risk in males.This topic is therefore still under debate, and further studies are required to clarify the association of the NSA with hip-fracture risk in males. The authors of the current study contribute to this topic by studying the relationship between NSA and the hip fragility fracture in a sample of white Italian males.     

Cerebral cyst formation following stereotactic ablative irradiation for non-nasopharyngeal head and neck malignancies: imaging findings and relevant dosimetric parameters

Objective:

To describe the clinical characteristics, imaging findings and relevant dosimetric parameters of cases presenting with cerebral cyst formation (CCF) after single or oligo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for non-nasopharyngeal head and neck malignancies (HNMs).

Methods:

We identified four cases with the follow-up duration of 5.7–9.1 years from SRT. The irradiated sites included the middle ear in one case and the ethmoid sinus in three cases, two of the latter possessed brain invasion. The chronological changes in MR images and the dose–volume histogram of the adjacent brain tissue were evaluated.

Results:

CCF with or without multiple septi presented with a latency of 29–86 months (median, 45.5 months), which was preceded by either non-specific parenchymal enhancement or typical radiation necrosis. In three cases, CCF adjacent to the frontal base resultantly caused mass effect, and two of these three cases required surgical intervention at 38 and 54 months, respectively, after SRT for alleviation of symptoms. The relation of the irradiated brain volumes to the biological equivalent dose based on the linear-quadratic (LQ) and LQ-cubic models was represented as a threshold.

Conclusion:

When contemplating SRT for HNM cases, caution should be exercised to the dose–volume relation-ship of the adjacent brain tissue, especially the frontal base, as well as other critical structures, and long-term vigilant follow-up is also mandatory.

Advances in knowledge:

CCF can occur as an unusual consequence of late brain injury with variable but mostly long latency following SRT for non-nasopharyngeal HNMs adjacent to the brain, even superficial parts that were previously irradiated via conventional radiotherapy.http://www.birpublications.org/doi/suppl/10.1259/bjr.20140071Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has emerged as a promising strategy for persistent or recurrent head and neck malignancies (HNMs) deemed not amenable to surgery or conventional radiotherapy (cRT).^1,2 Data regarding the efficacy and safety based on long-term follow ups have been rather limited, whilst various types of severe late toxicities have been reported.^1–3 Furthermore, the optimal dose fractionation scheme (DFS) has remained a controversial issue.^1–3Brain radiation necrosis is one of the important untoward sequelae after radiotherapy, including SRT for HNM, especially nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), with imaging findings being characterized by central loss of enhancement surrounded by feathery or reticular enhancement associated with perilesional oedema.^4–7 Cerebral cyst formation (CCF) is an unusual subset of radiation-induced brain injury and is usually encountered in cases harbouring intracranial disorders embedded in the parenchyma, such as arteriovenous malformation (AVM)^8,9 or brain metastases,^10,11 and rarely extra-axial tumours, such as meningioma¹² and neuroma,¹³ treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). CCF might also occur as a rare consequence of brain injury following definitive radiotherapy for NPC.^14–16 However, CCF as a predominant manifestation of late brain injury in cases with non-nasopharyngeal HNM treated with SRS or SRT is extremely rare.Herein, we describe four cases presenting with CCF following single or oligo-fractionated SRT for previously irradiated HNMs juxtaposed to the brain, focussing on the radiological findings and the relevant dosimetric parameters.     

The challenge of segmental small bowel motility quantitation using MR enterography

Objective:

Analysis of “cine” MRI using segmental regions of interest (ROIs) has become increasingly popular for investigating bowel motility; however, variation in motility in healthy subjects both within and between scans remains poorly described.

Methods:

20 healthy individuals (mean age, 28 years; 14, males) underwent MR enterography to acquire dynamic motility scans in both breath hold (BH) and free breathing (FB) on 2 occasions. Motility data were quantitatively assessed by placing four ROIs per subject in different small bowel segments and applying two measures: (1) contractions per minute (CPM) and (2) Jacobian standard deviation (SD) motility score. Within-scan (between segment) variation was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC), and repeatability was assessed using Bland–Altman limits of agreement (BA LoA).

Results:

Within-scan segmental variation: BH CPM and Jacobian SD metrics between the four segments demonstrated ICC R = 0.06, p = 0.100 and R = 0.20, p = 0.027 and in FB, the CPM and Jacobian SD metrics demonstrated ICC R = −0.26, p = 0.050 and R = 0.19, p = 0.030. Repeatability: BH CPM for matched segments ranged between 0 and 14 contractions with BA LoA of ±8.36 and Jacobian SD ranged between 0.09 and 0.51 with LoA of ±0.33. In FB data, CPM ranged between 0 and 10 contractions with BA LoA of ±7.25 and Jacobian SD ranged between 0.16 and 0.63 with LoA = ±0.28.

Conclusion:

The MRI-quantified small bowel motility in normal subjects demonstrates wide intersegmental variation and relatively poor repeatability over time.

Advances in knowledge:

This article presents baseline values for healthy individuals of within- and between-scan motility that are essential for understanding how this process changes in disease.Dynamic “cine” MRI acquired during MR enterography is increasingly utilized to assess bowel motility in a range of conditions, notably inflammatory bowel disease and enteric dysmotility syndromes.^1–4 Analysis of the data remains primarily subjective in clinical routine, but the ability to apply quantitative techniques makes this a potentially powerful methodology to explore gastrointestinal physiology in disease as well as an emerging application as a biomarker for drug efficacy.^5–7Despite the growing literature, a consensus has yet to be reached as to the best method of quantitatively analysing small bowel data and indeed a range of motility metrics are proposed.^2,3,8–12 The most commonly used metric is the change in luminal diameter at a fixed anatomical position through the time series. By tracking bowel diameter, a characteristic curve can be produced with the number of contractions expressed per minute (CPM) to give an intuitive and broadly accepted metric for small bowel motility (SBM).^{2–4,9,11,13–15} To date, several studies have reported a relationship between CPM and dysmotility in disease, either compared with a histopathological standard or “normal” reference bowel loops.^2–4,12 An array of additional metrics derived both from bowel diameter measures and more abstract processing techniques have further been implemented with varying degrees of effectiveness in disease and health.^{2,4,5,8,10,14,16}Although intuitively attractive, the robustness of assessing overall enteric motility using only an isolated loop of bowel has received relatively little attention to date irrespective of the precise metric applied. It is unclear how representative the selected bowel loops are of overall SBM and if normal motility intrinsically differs between bowel segments, for example, between the jejunum and ileum. Furthermore, the repeatability of single loop metrics, even in normal individuals, is not well described, knowledge of which is vital if segmental analysis is to be used to diagnose, guide treatment and monitor enteric pathology.The purpose of this study is to explore segmental variation in SBM in healthy volunteers measured using two commonly reported small bowel metrics [CPM and Jacobian standard deviation (SD)] looking at (1) within-scan motility variation between different segments and (2) between-scan variation (repeatability) across two time points.     

Diffusion-weighted MRI in the follow-up of chronic periaortitis

Objective:

To evaluate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) for the assessment of the intraindividual follow-up in patients with chronic periaortitis (CP) under medication.

Methods:

MRI data of 21 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed untreated disease were retrospectively examined before and after medical therapy, with a median follow-up of 16 weeks. DWI parameters [b800 signal, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values] of the CP and psoas muscle were analysed together with the extent and contrast enhancement. Pre- and post-treatment laboratory inflammation markers were acquired parallel to each MR examination.

Results:

Statistically significant lower b800 signal intensities (p ≤ 0.0001) and higher ADC values (p ≤ 0.0001) were observed after medical treatment within the fibrous periaortic tissue. Extent and contrast enhancement of the CP showed also a statistically significant decrease (p ≤ 0.0001) in the follow-up examinations, while the control parameters within the psoas muscle showed no differences.

Conclusion:

DWI seems to be a useful method for the evaluation of response to treatment without contrast agents. The technique may be helpful in the assessment of disease activity to guide further therapeutic strategies.

Advances in knowledge:

DWI detects significant differences in the intraindividual follow-up of CP under medical therapy.Chronic periaortitis (CP) is a proliferating fibroinflammatory disease of the perivascular retroperitoneal space and aortic wall.^1–4 Owing to adventitial inflammation, some recent theories consider CP as a large vessel vasculitis.⁵ Clinical manifestations of CP include idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis, inflammatory aortic aneurysm and perianeurysmal retroperitoneal fibrosis.^2,6,7 The three manifestations with very similar histopathological characteristics are distinguished by the diameter of the abdominal aorta and concomitant ureteral affection.^1,3,7Specific clinical symptoms are caused by extrinsic compression of the ureters or retroperitoneal veins, resulting in hydronephrosis, oliguria, lower extremity oedema and deep vein thrombosis.^1,8Under medical treatment with steroids, CP has a good prognosis.⁷ Today tamoxifen is suggested as a safe and effective therapeutic alternative, and immunosuppressive drugs can be considered in patients with suboptimal responses to these drugs or multiple relapses.^9–11CT and MRI are the modalities of first choice for diagnosis and follow-up of CP.^1,7,12 The fibrotic para-aortic tissue shows significant contrast uptake in gadolinium-enhanced MRI.^12–14 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was suggested for the assessment of the disease activity.^15,16 However, in cases with impaired renal function (e.g. by ureteral compression), gadolinium-independent imaging methods should be preferred owing to the potential development of a nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.¹⁷Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is a non-contrast MR modality that has been successfully applied for the assessment of retroperitoneal masses, inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms and for the differentiation between retroperitoneal fibrosis and malignant retroperitoneal neoplasms.^18–21DWI indicates restricted diffusion of water, for example caused by a high cellularity in malignant disease or active inflammation. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a quantitative parameter for the level of restricted diffusion, which is calculated from the signals of different diffusion gradients (b-values).²²In the context of untreated CP diffusion-weighted MRI may detect restricted inflammation as a sign of high cellularity caused by active inflammation.There are no data for the evaluation of intraindividual follow-up and the response to treatment by DWI of CP so far. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyse differences in DWI signals during follow-up in patients with CP before and after treatment. In addition, we sought to elucidate the potential of DWI in the therapy monitoring of CP.     

Walking on thin ice! Identifying methamphetamine “drug mules” on digital plain radiography

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of identifying methamphetamine (MA) internal payloads in “drug mules” by plain abdominal digital radiography (DR).

Methods:

The study consisted of 35 individuals suspected of internal MA drug containers. A total of 59 supine digital radiographs were collected. An overall calculation regarding the diagnostic accuracy for all “drug mules” and a specific evaluation concerning the radiological appearance of drug packs as well as the rate of clearance and complications in correlation with the reader''s experience were performed. The gold standard was the presence of secured drug packs in the faeces.

Results:

There were 16 true-positive “drug mules” identified. DR of all drug carriers for Group 1 (forensic imaging experienced readers, n = 2) exhibited a sensitivity of 100%, a mean specificity of 76.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 78.5%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% and a mean accuracy 87.2%. Group 2 (inexperienced readers, n = 3) showed a lower sensitivity (93.7%), a mean specificity of 86%, a PPV of 86.5%, an NPV of 94.1% and a mean accuracy of 89.5%. The interrater agreement within Group 1 was 0.72 and within Group 2 averaged to 0.79, indicating a fair to very good agreement.

Conclusion:

DR is a valuable screening tool in cases of MA body packers with huge internal payloads being associated with a high diagnostic insecurity. Diagnostic insecurity on plain films may be overcome by low-dose CT as a cross-sectional imaging modality and addressed by improved radiological education in reporting drug carriers on imaging.

Advances in knowledge:

Diagnostic signs (double-condom and halo signs) on digital plain radiography are specific in MA “drug mules”, although DR is associated with high diagnostic insecurity and underreports the total internal payload.For the past decade, significant worldwide manufacturing of amphetamine-type stimulants has been reported to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna, Austria, with a predominance of methamphetamine (MA) and its derivatives, which are also known as “syabu” or “ice”, throughout East and South East Asia.¹ In this region, the use of this synthetic drug is more prevalent than that of cocaine or heroin, which are more common in relatively developed areas, such as Europe and the USA.² During the course of this development, an increase in the number of drug carriers being intercepted by law enforcement at the borders of Malaysia has been observed. Drug carriers or “drug mules” are generally referred to as a human harbouring internal illicit drug packet(s). Internal body concealment of illegal drugs is one of the methods used to smuggle this illicit drug across the border.^3,4 “Drug mules” are generally known as body packers.^5,6 However, for correct terminology, one should differentiate between the terms body packer, body pusher and body stuffer. A body packer swallows a large amount of specially prepared drug packets to smuggle the packets in their gastrointestinal tract across a national border.^5,6 A body pusher hides a few containers in easily accessible body cavities, such as the rectum or vagina. Body stuffers, including traffickers and users, ingest intentionally small amounts of loosely wrapped drug pellets (typically initially hidden in the mouth), usually immediately before an unexpected encounter with law enforcement.^5–10The generally accepted radiological examination is a plain abdominal radiograph in the supine projection.^4–6 This technique is widely available at a low cost and is a simple method of detecting drug-filled packets within the alimentary tract. Radiation exposure to the patient is relatively moderate. In the literature, the detection rate for drug-filled packets is highly variable, and sensitivities from 58.3% to 90% have been reported.^4,5,11 Hence, plain abdominal radiography is a flawed screening method for identifying “drug mules”. Examining the bowel for foreign bodies, such as drug containers with variable sizes and radiodensities, is problematic, even for an experienced radiologist because the drug-filled packets may have an appearance similar to that of stool and gas and may be superimposed. Specific appearances described in the literature, such as the “double-condom”, “halo” and “rosette” signs, may be diagnostic for drug packages but are not necessarily so.^{4–6,11–13} Other modalities employed worldwide for the identification of body packers include CT, ultrasound, MRI and low-dose linear slit digital radiography (LSDR or LODOX®; Lodox Systems, Johannesburg, South Africa).^4,5,14–18Recent research has mainly concentrated on cocaine and heroin drug trafficking, which occurs predominantly in Western countries.^{3,4,6,7,11,14,19} There is little research on the accuracy of plain abdominal radiography in MA drug carriers, although there has been a significant increase of MA in Asia, accompanied by draconian legal measures in cases of drug trafficking.^1,2 The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of plain abdominal digital radiography (DRL) for identifying the internal payloads of MA in “drug mules”.     

Medial temporal lobe atrophy in Alzheimer's disease/mild cognitive impairment with depression

Objective:

Depression is common in patients with Alzheimer''s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Patients with depression have an earlier onset and rapid progression of cognitive decline. Medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) is common in AD and MCI, and some degree of atrophy is found in almost all patients. In the present study, an attempt was made to know if MTA is more common in patients with AD/MCI with depression than those without it.

Methods:

Patients reporting to the outpatient department of a neurology centre of a tertiary care hospital were recruited for the present study. After initial general physical and neurological examination, they were evaluated using National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Related Disorders Association criteria for diagnosis of AD. Clinical Dementia rating scale was used for the diagnosis of MCI. Cornell scale for depression in dementia (CSDD) was used.

Results:

We found 20 cases with depression as per CSDD out of a sample of 37 patients (male:female = 30:7). There were 26 patients with AD and 11 with MCI. The mean age of all patients was 72.33 ± 6.45 years. The mean mini mental status examination score was 19.00 ± 6.73. The mean time since diagnosis was 4.19 ± 3.26 years. The mean Scheltens visual rating scale score for right MTA was 2.08 ± 0.95 and was 2.05 ± 0.94 for the left. Both scores did not differ statistically when analyzed using paired t-test (p > 0.05). However, difference in those with depression (2.36 ± 0.95) from those without depression (1.60 ± 0.74) was significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

MTA scores were higher in those with AD/MCI with depression than those without it.Depression¹ is common in patients with Alzheimer''s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Relationship between depression and cognitive decline is a complex one, and depression is both an aetiological risk factor² and comorbidity for dementia.³ Incidence and prevalence of depressive symptoms in MCI range from 15% in population-based studies to 44% in hospital-based studies.⁴ Likewise, up to two-thirds of patients with AD have been reported to have depression.⁵ Because in many studies, depression has been seen to be an early manifestation of AD, it has been suggested that it may represent a continuum⁴ from depression to MCI to AD (late-life depression → MCI → AD). Two recent meta-analyses have found that a history of depression approximately doubles an individual''s risk for subsequent dementia in general and AD in particular.⁶ Depression is known to be neurotoxic to medial temporal lobe structures and can contribute to their atrophy.^7–9 Atrophy is more so, when depression is severe or recurrent⁷ and medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) has a temporal association with depression.⁹ Continued treatment of depression has been shown to protect the hippocampus from the ill effects of depression.¹⁰ Although volumetric method could be a preferred mode of measuring the hippocampal volume in AD, qualitative rating of MTA is a good alternative.¹¹ Visual rating of the hippocampal volume^12–14 can be carried out using Scheltens et al¹⁵ rating scale that is based on the width of the choroid fissure, the width of the temporal horn and the height of hippocampal formation and is a quantitative scale.     

Radiographers' professional knowledge regarding parameters and safety issues in plain radiography: a questionnaire survey

Objective:

To review the knowledge of radiographers and examine the possible sociodemographic and situational contributors to this knowledge.

Methods:

A questionnaire survey was devised and distributed to a cohort of 120 radiographers. Each questionnaire contained two sections. In the first section, background data, including sex, age, highest academic level, grade point average (GPA), length of time from graduation, work experience as a radiographer and the status of previous refresher course(s), were collected. The second section contained 17 multiple-choice questions concerning radiographic imaging parameters and safety issues.

Results:

The response rate was 63.8%. In univariate analytic model, higher academic degree (p < 0.001), higher GPA (r² = 0.11; p = 0.001), academic workplace (p = 0.04) and taking previous refresher course(s) (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with higher knowledge score. In multivariate analytic model, however, higher academic degree (B = 1.62; p = 0.01), higher GPA (B = 0.50; p = 0.01) and taking previous refresher course(s) (B = −1.26; p = 0.03) were independently associated with higher level of knowledge. Age, sex, length of time from graduation and work experience were not associated with the respondents'' knowledge score.

Conclusion:

Academic background is a robust indicator of a radiographer''s professional knowledge. Refresher courses and regular knowledge assessments are highly recommended.

Advances in knowledge:

This is the first study in the literature that examines professional knowledge of radiographers in terms of technical and safety issues in plain radiography. Academic degree, GPA and refresher courses are independent predictors of this knowledge. Regular radiographer professional knowledge checks may be recommended.The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations mandates “processes that are designed to ensure that the competency of all staff members is assessed, maintained, demonstrated and improved on an ongoing basis.” Tests with practical questions that reflect the knowledge required to perform daily examinations have been proposed as effective tools to attain this purpose. The results enable us to take on existing blemishes and improve the competency.¹Medical imaging, as a field with growing complexity and increasing impact on diagnosis, plans of management and patient health status,² is a good example of raised requirements for competency.^3–8Knowledge assessment may be useful for detecting possible weaknesses in an organization and spotlighting existing educational flaws and shortcomings.⁹ According to some reports, knowledge assessment takes priority over checking competency,^7,10 particularly in professions that are completely mediated by technology.¹¹In addition, although clinical education is the mainstay for developing skills, it has been shown that the combination of practical and theoretical education would lead to a significantly better outcome in the field of teaching. This integrated approach of using both knowledge and practice in education enables the trainee to work more competently and be prepared to take responsibility in his/her future career.¹²Although radiography using film for imaging the internal organs of the body has been introduced for over a century,¹³ it is still among the most widespread and useful imaging modalities all over the world. Radiographers are generally in charge of radiological equipment, imaging examination and frequently nursing care.^7,14,15Incompetent radiographers could render radiographic examinations suboptimal. A poor radiographic technique, in turn, may lead to unnecessary exposures to X-radiation, poor image quality, repeated views and examinations, patient discomfort or further injury because of poor positioning and the possibility of a missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis.¹⁶Furthermore, a rapid shift from conventional to fully digitized radiology departments, along with rapidly evolving changes in healthcare administration¹⁷ entails knowledgeable, up-to-date radiographers who utilize the technology.¹⁸Except for very limited number of studies that have described radiographers'' self-reported competency^7,16 and the level of awareness pertaining to the protection against radiation,^19,20 to the best of our knowledge, there is no study in the literature regarding radiographers'' level of knowledge with a dedicated focus on technical parameters and safety in plain radiography.This study sets out to examine knowledge amongst a cohort of radiographers and to investigate possible association of some sociodemographic and situational factors with the level of this knowledge.     

Quantitative pixelwise myocardial perfusion maps from first-pass perfusion MRI

Objective:

To calculate and evaluate absolute quantitative myocardial perfusion maps from rest first-pass perfusion MRI.

Methods:

10 patients after revascularization of myocardial infarction underwent cardiac rest first-pass perfusion MRI. Additionally, perfusion examinations were performed in 12 healthy volunteers. Quantitative myocardial perfusion maps were calculated by using a deconvolution technique, and results were compared were the findings of a sector-based quantification.

Results:

Maps were typically calculated within 3 min per slice. For the volunteers, myocardial blood flow values of the maps were 0.51 ± 0.16 ml g⁻¹ per minute, whereas sector-based evaluation delivered 0.52 ± 0.15 ml g⁻¹ per minute. A t-test revealed no statistical difference between the two sets of values. For the patients, all perfusion defects visually detected in the dynamic perfusion series could be correctly reproduced in the maps.

Conclusion:

Calculation of quantitative perfusion maps from myocardial perfusion MRI examinations is feasible. The absolute quantitative maps provide additional information on the transmurality of perfusion defects compared with the visual evaluation of the perfusion series and offer a convenient way to present perfusion MRI findings.

Advances in knowledge:

Voxelwise analysis of myocardial perfusion helps clinicians to assess the degree of tissue damage, and the resulting maps are a good tool to present findings to patients.MRI is widely used for the evaluation of myocardial perfusion. Advantages of perfusion MRI are a higher spatial resolution compared with positron emission tomography (PET)^1,2 and single photon emission CT³ and the lack of exposure to radiation. Great efforts have been made to use MRI for quantitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion in the past years.^4,5 In clinical routine, however, evaluation of MRI perfusion examinations is performed by the visual analysis of the acquired images depicting areas remaining hypo-intense during the passage of the contrast agent bolus. One main reason for not quantifying myocardial perfusion is the sometimes-excessive user interaction time required for manual segmentation of the acquired images in the quantification process.If myocardial perfusion is quantified, in most studies, the high spatial resolution of the acquired MR images is not maintained. Instead, a sector-based evaluation is performed.^6,7 First attempts have been made to calculate myocardial perfusion maps to evaluate regional myocardial perfusion.^3,8–10 However, until now, these studies were performed in animals^8–10 or perfusion was only evaluated semiquantitatively.³ Recently, our group has published an automatic post-processing tool for quantitative perfusion evaluation.¹¹ That study focused on the automation of post-processing but confined itself on sectors of the myocardium. The next and consequent step is to evolve this technique to work on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Therefore, it was the goal of this study to develop and test a method that calculates pixelwise quantitative perfusion maps from myocardial perfusion MRI examinations. These maps might help the clinician in making a diagnosis by decreasing the number of images to be examined, because a pixelwise quantitative perfusion map demonstrates the information of a whole series of images obtained in a first-pass perfusion examination clearly arranged.