Two-year prognosis of acute coronary syndrome during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

BackgroundThe first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic significantly changed behaviour in terms of access to healthcare.AimTo assess the effects of the pandemic and initial lockdown on the incidence of acute coronary syndrome and its long-term prognosis.MethodsPatients admitted for acute coronary syndrome from 17 March to 6 July 2020 and from 17 March to 6 July 2019 were included. The number of admissions for acute coronary syndrome, acute complication rates and 2-year rates of survival free from major adverse cardiovascular events or death from any cause were compared according to the period of hospitalization.ResultsIn total, 289 patients were included. We observed a 30 ± 3% drop in acute coronary syndrome admissions during the first lockdown, which did not recover in the 2 months after it was lifted. At 2 years, there were no significant differences in the combined endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events or death from any cause between the different periods (P = 0.34). Being hospitalized during lockdown was not predictive of adverse events during follow-up (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.45–1.66; P = 0.67).ConclusionsWe did not observe an increased risk of major cardiovascular events or death at 2 years from initial hospitalization for patients hospitalized during the first lockdown, adopted in March 2020 in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, potentially as a result of the lack of power of the study.     

Population-based assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection among people living with HIV and the general population of Catalonia (March–December, 2020)

IntroductionIt is unclear if SARS-CoV-2 has affected people living with HIV (PLWH) more.MethodsWe compared SARS-CoV-2 testing, test positivity, hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality between PLWH and the general HIV-negative population of Catalonia, Spain from March 1 to December 15, 2020.ResultsSARS-CoV-2 testing was lower among PLWH 3556/13,142 (27.06%) compared to the general HIV-negative population 1,954,902/6,446,672 (30.32%) (p < 0.001) but test positivity was higher among PLWH (21.06% vs. 15.82%, p < 0.001). We observed no significant differences between PLWH and the general population in terms of hospitalisation (13.75% vs. 14.97%, p = 0.174) and ICU admission (0.93% vs. 1.66%, p = 0.059). Among positive cases, we found a lower mortality rate among PLWH compared to the general population (1.74% vs 3.64%, p = 0.002).ConclusionPLWH tested less frequently for SARS-CoV-2, had a higher test positivity, similar ICU admission and hospitalisation rates, and lower SARS-CoV-2-associated mortality compared to the general HIV-negative population.     

Changes in the management of IBD patients since the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. A path toward the implementation of telemedicine in Spain?

BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic increased medical services demand aside from interrupting daily clinical practice for other diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here we present the results of a survey to gain the perception of IBD specialists in their patient-management using telemedicine in their daily practice.MethodsThis was an observational survey study among physicians focused on IBD (gastroenterologist, surgeons, and pediatricians) members of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU), the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology (AEG), and the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP), regarding changes of management of IBD patients.ResultsWe received a total of 269 responses to the survey (from May to June 2020). Before the pandemic, nearly all the respondents reported performing very frequently their visits face-to-face (n = 251, 93.3%) while, during the pandemic, the telephone visits were the most frequent visits performed (n = 138, 51.3%). Regarding communication difficulties, 157 (58.4%) respondents reported the impossibility of performing a proper examination as the most relevant issue. Also, 114 (42.4%) respondents considered remote visits more time-consuming than face-to-face visits. Most gastroenterologists (n = 188, 83.2%) considered patients with active perianal disease in special need of face-to-face consultation and more than half of the surgeons (n = 35, 50.7%) reported having performed an immediate postoperative follow-up remotely.ConclusionsMost IBD units have implemented remote visits during the pandemic, but most professionals found them more time-consuming and unsuitable for some disease profiles. Therefore, there is a need for the development of better telemedicine systems that can meet professionals’ and patients’ requirements.     

Bacteremia during COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary hospital in Spain

IntroductionThe reasons for the decrease in blood cultures were investigated and the rate and aetiology of bacteremia and contaminated blood cultures collected from COVID and non-COVID patients were assessed.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital in Spain during the COVID period from 4th March 2020 to 21st June 2020.ResultsThe number of blood cultures processed was 5313, representing 22.7% and 18.8% of decrease compared to the same months of 2019 and 2018, respectively (p = 0.173). The rate of bacteremia was 1.2% higher among COVID-patients than among non-COVID patients (p < 0.001). COVID patients had a higher proportion of nosocomial bacteremia (95.5%) than non-COVID patients (30.5%) (p < 0.001). In COVID-positive patients, the contamination rate was 12.3% vs 5.7% in non-COVID patients (p < 0.001).ConclusionThere was a decrease in the number of blood cultures collected during the COVID period compared to previous years. Bacteremia in COVID patients was mainly nosocomial and catheter-related.     

Acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A Portuguese cohort

IntroductionThe incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients ranges from 0.5% to 35% and has been associated with worse prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, severity, duration, risk factors and prognosis of AKI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of 192 hospitalized COVID-19 patients from March to May of 2020. AKI was diagnosed using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) classification based on serum creatinine (SCr) criteria. Persistent and transient AKI were defined according to the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) workgroup definitions.ResultsIn this cohort of COVID-19 patients, 55.2% developed AKI (n = 106). The majority of AKI patients had persistent AKI (n = 64, 60.4%). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 18.2% (n = 35) and was higher in AKI patients (28.3% vs. 5.9%, p < 0.001, unadjusted OR 6.03 (2.22–16.37), p < 0.001). In this multivariate analysis, older age (adjusted OR 1.07 (95% CI 1.02–1.11), p = 0.004), lower Hb level (adjusted OR 0.78 (95% CI 0.60–0.98), p = 0.035), duration of AKI (adjusted OR 7.34 for persistent AKI (95% CI 2.37–22.72), p = 0.001) and severity of AKI (adjusted OR 2.65 per increase in KDIGO stage (95% CI 1.32–5.33), p = 0.006) were independent predictors of mortality.ConclusionAKI was frequent in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Persistent AKI and higher severity of AKI were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.     

Pre-hospital Aspirin Use and Patient Outcomes in COVID-19: Results from the International Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS)

IntroductionThe goal of this investigation is to assess the association between prehospital use of aspirin (ASA) and patient-centered outcomes in a large global cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.MethodsThis study utilizes data from the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS) Registry. Adult patients hospitalized from February 15th, 2020, to September 30th, 2021, were included. Multivariable regression analyses were utilized to assess the association between pre-hospital use of ASA and the primary outcome of overall hospital mortality.Results21,579 patients were included from 185 hospitals (predominantly US-based, 71.3%), with 4691 (21.7%) receiving pre-hospital ASA. Patients receiving ASA, compared to those without pre-admission ASA use, were generally older (median 70 vs. 59 years), more likely to be male (58.7 vs. 56.0%), caucasian (57.4 vs. 51.6%), and more commonly had higher rates of medical comorbidities. In multivariable analyses, patients receiving pre-hospital ASA had lower mortality (HR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.82–0.97, p = 0.01) and reduced hazard for progression to severe disease or death (HR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.99, p = 0.02) and more hospital free days (1.00 days, 95% CI 0.66–1.35, p = 0.01) compared to those without pre-hospital ASA use. The overall direction and significance of the results remained the same in sensitivity analysis, after adjusting the multivariable model for time since pandemic.ConclusionsIn this large international cohort, pre-hospital use of ASA was associated with a lower hazard for death in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Randomized controlled trials may be warranted to assess the utility of pre-hospital use of ASA.     

Increase in peritoneal dialysis-related hospitalization rates after telemedicine implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction and objectivesTo minimize our peritoneal dialysis (PD) population exposure to coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in April 2020 we developed and implemented a telemedicine program. In this investigation, we aimed to compare the hospitalization rates and metabolic disorders in patients undergoing PD 6 months before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and telemedicine implementation.Materials and methodsThis single-center retrospective analysis included all active prevalent patients undergoing PD from April 2020. Dialysis records were reviewed to obtain clinical, demographic, laboratory, appointment, and hospitalization data. We compared hospitalization rates (total, non-PD-related, and PD-related), hospitalization-associated factors, and metabolic disorders (hemoglobin, serum potassium, and serum phosphate) 6 months before and after the pandemic.ResultsOur sample comprised 103 participants. During the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods, there were 13 and 27 hospital admissions, respectively. The total hospitalization incident rate ratio (IRR) was 2.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29–4.75). PD-related hospitalizations increased from 3 to 15 episodes (IRR = 7.25 [95% CI, 2.11–24.78]). In the pre-pandemic period, the educational level was lower in participants hospitalised due to PD-related issues than in participants not hospitalised. In the post-pandemic period, only sex distribution differed between patients not hospitalised and those hospitalised due to non-PD-related issues. Only serum potassium levels changed significantly in the post-pandemic period (4.79 ± 0.48 vs. 4.93 ± 0.54 mg/dL; P < 0.01).ConclusionThis study showed a significant increase in hospitalization rates after the COVID-19 pandemic period and telemedicine implementation, mainly due to PD-related infectious causes. Strategies to improve distance monitoring assistance are needed for the PD population.     

Pacientes críticos COVID-19. ¿Han variado el manejo y los resultados en la UCI tras un año de pandemia? Estudio multicéntrico,prospectivo, observacional

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical characteristics, treatments, and evolution of critical patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated in intensive care units (ICU) after one year of pandemic.MethodologyMulticenter, prospective study, which included critical COVID-19 patients in 9 ICUs in northwestern Spain. The clinical characteristics, treatments, and evolution of patients admitted to the ICU during the months of March-April 2020 (period 1) were compared with patients admitted in January-February 2021 (period 2).Results337 patients were included (98 in period 1 and 239 in period 2). In period 2, fewer patients required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (65% vs. 84%, P < .001), using high-flow nasal cannulas (CNAF) more frequently (70% vs. 7%, P < .001), ventilation non-invasive mechanical (NIMV) (40% vs. 14%, P < .001), corticosteroids (100% vs. 96%, P = .007) and prone position in both awake (42% vs. 28%, P = .012), and intubated patients (67% vs. 54%, P = .034). The days of IMV, ICU stay and hospital stay were lower in period 2. Mortality was similar in the two periods studied (16% vs. 17%).ConclusionsAfter one year of pandemic, we observed that in patients admitted to the ICU, CNAF, NIMV, use of the prone position, and corticosteroids have been used more frequently, reducing the number of patients in IMV, and the length of stay in the ICU and hospital stay. Mortality was similar in the two study periods.     

The effect of liver test abnormalities on the prognosis of COVID-19

IntroductionCOVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread rapidly across the world. In our study, we aim to investigate the relationship between the liver enzymes on admission (AST, ALT, ALP, GGT) and severity of COVID-19. We evaluated course of disease, hospital stay, liver damage and mortality.Materials and methodsOur study included 614 patients who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID-19 between 03.16.20 and 05.12.20. Patients with liver disease, hematological and solid organ malignancy with liver metastases were excluded, resulting in 554 patients who met our inclusion criteria. We retrospectively evaluated liver transaminase levels, AST/ALT ratio, cholestatic enzyme levels and R ratio during hospital admission and these were compared in terms of morbidity, mortality and clinical course.ResultsMean age of 554 subjects were 66.21 ± 15.45 years, 328 (59.2%) were men. The mean values of liver enzymes on admission were AST (36.2 ± 33.6 U/L), ALT (34.01 ± 49.34 U/L), ALP (78.8 ± 46.86 U/L), GGT (46.25 ± 60.05 U/L). Mortality rate and need for intensive care unit were statistically significant in subjects that had high ALT–AST levels during their admission to the hospital (p = 0.001). According to the ROC analysis AST/ALT ratio was a good marker of mortality risk (AUC = 0.713: p = 0.001) and expected probability of intensive care unit admission (AUC = 0.636: p = 0.001). R ratio, which was used to evaluate prognosis, showed a poor prognosis rate of 26.5% in the cholestatic injury group, 36.1% in the mixed pattern group and 30% in the hepato-cellular injury group (p 0.001).ConclusionsALT–AST elevation and AST/ALT ratio >1 was associated with more severe course and increased mortality in COVID-19.     

COVID-19 associated infections in the ICU setting: A retrospective analysis in a tertiary-care hospital

IntroductionOur work describes the frequency of superinfections in COVID-19 ICU patients and identifies risk factors for its appearance. Second, we evaluated ICU length of stay, in-hospital mortality and analyzed a subgroup of multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDROs) infections.MethodsRetrospective study conducted between March and June 2020. Superinfections were defined as appeared ≥48 h. Bacterial and fungal infections were included, and sources were ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection (VA-LRTI), primary bloodstream infection (BSI), secondary BSI, and urinary tract infection (UTI). We performed a univariate analysis and a multivariate analysis of the risk factors.ResultsTwo-hundred thirteen patients were included. We documented 174 episodes in 95 (44.6%) patients: 78 VA-LRTI, 66 primary BSI, 9 secondary BSI and 21 UTI. MDROs caused 29.3% of the episodes. The median time from admission to the first episode was 18 days and was longer in MDROs than in non-MDROs (28 vs. 16 days, p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis use of corticosteroids (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.4–16.9, p 0.01), tocilizumab (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1–5.9, p 0.03) and broad-spectrum antibiotics within first 7 days of admission (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.1, p < 0.01) were associated with superinfections. Patients with superinfections presented respect to controls prolonged ICU stay (35 vs. 12 days, p < 0.01) but not higher in-hospital mortality (45.3% vs. 39.7%, p 0.13).ConclusionsSuperinfections in ICU patients are frequent in late course of admission. Corticosteroids, tocilizumab, and previous broad-spectrum antibiotics are identified as risk factors for its development.     

Lung Function,Radiological Findings and Biomarkers of Fibrogenesis in a Cohort of COVID-19 Patients Six Months After Hospital Discharge

IntroductionImpairment in pulmonary function tests and radiological abnormalities are a major concern in COVID-19 survivors. Our aim is to evaluate functional respiratory parameters, changes in chest CT, and correlation with peripheral blood biomarkers involved in lung fibrosis at two and six months after SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.MethodsCOVID-FIBROTIC (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04409275) is a multicenter prospective observational cohort study aimed to evaluate discharged patients. Pulmonary function tests, circulating serum biomarkers, chest radiography and chest CT were performed at outpatient visits.ResultsIn total, 313, aged 61.12 ± 12.26 years, out of 481 included patients were available. The proportion of patients with DLCO < 80% was 54.6% and 47% at 60 and 180 days. Associated factors with diffusion impairment at 6 months were female sex (OR: 2.97, 95%CI 1.74–5.06, p = 0.001), age (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01–1.05, p = 0.005), and peak RALE score (OR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.06–1.40, p = 0.005). Patients with altered lung diffusion showed higher levels of MMP-7 (11.54 ± 8.96 vs 6.71 ± 4.25, p = 0.001), and periostin (1.11 ± 0.07 vs 0.84 ± 0.40, p = 0.001). 226 patients underwent CT scan, of whom 149 (66%) had radiological sequelae of COVID-19. In severe patients, 68.35% had ground glass opacities and 38.46% had parenchymal bands. Early fibrotic changes were associated with higher levels of MMP7 (13.20 ± 9.20 vs 7.92 ± 6.32, p = 0.001), MMP1 (10.40 ± 8.21 vs 6.97 ± 8.89, p = 0.023), and periostin (1.36 ± 0.93 vs 0.87 ± 0.39, p = 0.001).ConclusionAlmost half of patients with moderate or severe COVID-19 pneumonia had impaired pulmonary diffusion six months after discharge. Severe patients showed fibrotic lesions in CT scan and elevated serum biomarkers involved in pulmonary fibrosis.     

Clinical and Epidemiological Correlates of Low IFN-Gamma Responses in Mitogen Tube of QuantiFERON Assay in Tuberculosis Infection Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Population-Based Marker of COVID-19 Mortality?

BackgroundThe clinical and epidemiological implications of abnormal immune responses in COVID-19 for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening are unclear.MethodsWe reviewed QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) results (36,709 patients) from July 2016 until October 2021 in Asturias (Spain). We also studied a cohort of ninety hospitalized patients with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia and a group of elderly hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who underwent serial QFT-Plus and immune profiling testing.ResultsThe indeterminate QFT-Plus results rate went from 1.4% (July 2016 to November 2019) to 4.2% during the COVID-19 pandemic. The evolution of the number of cases with low/very low interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) response in the mitogen tube paralleled the disease activity and number of deaths during the pandemic waves in our region (from March 2020 to October 2021). The percentages of positive QFT-plus patients did not significantly change before and during the pandemic (13.9% vs. 12.2%). Forty-nine patients from the suspected/confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia cohort (54.4%) had low/very low IFN-gamma response to mitogen, 22 of them (24.4%) had severe and critical pneumonia. None received immunosuppressants prior to testing. Abnormal radiological findings (P = 0.01) but not COVID-19 severity was associated with low mitogen response. Immune profiling showed a reduction of CD8 + T cells and a direct correlation between the number of EMRA CD8 + T-cells and IFN-gamma response to mitogen (P = 0.03).ConclusionLow IFN-gamma responses in mitogen tube of QFT-Plus often occur in COVID-19 pneumonia, which is associated with a low number of an effector CD8 + T-cell subset and does not seem to affect LTBI screening; however, this abnormality seems to parallel the dynamics of COVID-19 at the population level and its mortality.     

The burden of inpatient costs in inflammatory bowel disease and opportunities to optimize care: A single metropolitan Australian center experience

Background and aimsInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) causes significant morbidity, frequently resulting in hospital admission and resection surgery. However, little is known about: 1. how IBD patients' inpatient healthcare utilisation compares to other inpatients and 2. whether there are potentially modifiable factors which may influence this.MethodsOver five months a cohort of admitted IBD patients were acquired and each assigned five admitted, age and gender matched controls at a single tertiary center. Data compared over 15 months included: total cumulative length of stay (TLoS), number of admissions (index and subsequent re-admissions), inpatient costs, care complexity (defined by relative stay index [RSI]), and disease-specific factors amongst the IBD cohort. Data were confirmed by case notes review.ResultsThere were 102 IBD patients and 510 controls (median age 44 years, 57% female). IBD patients had more re-admissions (mean 1.72 vs 1.55, p = 0.002) and longer TLoS (median 6.8 vs 3.4 days, p < 0.0001) than controls. Both median cumulative cost of inpatient healthcare and RSI were also higher in IBD compared to controls ($7052 vs $5470 and RSI 362% vs 293%, each p < 0.008). IBD patients seen by a gastroenterologist prior to their index admission had fewer re-admissions (mean 1.37 vs 2.02, p = 0.016,) and tended to have lower total cumulative inpatient costs than those without prior Gastroenterologist review (median $6439 vs $9479, p = 0.069).ConclusionsIBD patients have significantly greater inpatient healthcare utilization, complexity and costs than age and gender matched, hospitalized controls. Prior gastroenterologist care in IBD may reduce subsequent admission rates, and inpatient-related costs.     

Diabetes and COVID-19: A pooled analysis related to disease severity and mortality

Globally, COVID-19 has become a major concern for the diabetic community. We conducted a pooled analysis and constructed a forest plot for the association between diabetes and COVID-19 progression in 47 studies. A random effects meta-analysis (Mantel–Haenszel method) was conducted to estimate the outcomes effect size as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Review Manager Software version 5.3. COVID-19 patients with diabetes have a significantly higher risk of disease severity (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.69–2.86, p < 0.00001) and associated mortality outcomes (OR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.93–3.30, p =  < 0.00001).     

Telerreumatología en tiempos de crisis durante la pandemia por COVID-19

IntroductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic strategies to prevent transmission of the viral infection obliged our hospital to promote virtual consultations.ObjetiveThe objective of this study is to describe the results obtained with the previous strategy of transferring activity to teleconsultation during the period of maximum impact of the pandemic.Material and methodsBetween 16/03 and 10/05/2020 all successive consultations in our unit were performed in virtual rheumatology teleconference (RTC) format. The socio-demographic, geo-functional and clinical characteristics of all patients were collected; a numeric verbal scale (NVS) (where 0=very dissatisfied to 10=fully satisfied) was applied to assess the degree of satisfaction of the doctor/patient with the RTC.Results469 TC were included. Most patients seen by RTC were women, mean age: 60,83 years. Only 16% had university education. The mean distance travelled for face-to face consultation is 33 Km with a mean total time of 2 hours. Most individuals were diagnosed with osteoarthritis/soft tissue rheumatic diseases and/or osteoporosis; 21% had rheumatoid arthritis. The mean length of the TC was 9.64 minutes. We find more patient satisfaction with the TC when their level of education is higher (OR=4.12); doctor satisfaction was higher when the individual was better able to manage the Internet (OR=3.01).ConclusionIt is possible to transfer rheumatological care activity to TC with a considerable degree of satisfaction for both the patient and the doctor.     

Clinical outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients treated by direct catheter-based trombectomy depending on their baseline characteristics

BackgroundDirect catheter-based thrombectomy (d-CBT) was proven to be an effective treatment for proximal occlusions of the major intracranial arteries in acute stroke patients. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients treated by d-CBT depending on their baseline characteristics.MethodsA single center, prospective, observational registry of consecutive patients (pts) treated by d-CBT for an acute ischemic stroke. The degree of dependence after a stroke was measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months follow-up and pts were divided into 2 subgroups based on functional independence/dependence (mRS 0–2 vs. 3–6).ResultsA total of 111 consecutive patients (mean age 65.9 ys, men 55%) have been enrolled. A favorable outcome (mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months) was reached in 39.8% (44 pts). The pts with favorable outcome (mRS ≤ 2) compared to pts with poor outcome (mRS 3–6) were younger (61 ys vs. 70 ys, p < 0.01), had higher prevalence of cigarette smoking (45.5% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.002) and had lower prevalence of known atrial fibrilation (25% vs. 53.7%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the subgroups in: sex (men 50% vs. 58%, p = 0.27), body mass index (27.8 vs. 29.2, p = 0.21), arterial hypertension (70.5% vs. 77.6%, p = 0.26), diabetes mellitus (15.9% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.15), chronic kidney disease (11.4% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.08) and NIHSS on admission (15 vs. 18, p = 0.69).ConclusionsMechanical thrombectomy achieved better clinical results in younger patients, in smokers and in patients with stroke not caused by atrial fibrillation.     

Factores de riesgo de muerte hospitalaria en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio durante la pandemia de la COVID-19

Introduction and objectivesDespite advances in treatment, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) still exhibit unfavorable short- and long-term prognoses. In addition, there is scant evidence about the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation, complications, and risk factors for mortality in patients admitted for AMI during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsThis prospective, multicenter, cohort study included all consecutive patients with AMI who underwent coronary angiography in a 30-day period corresponding chronologically with the COVID-19 outbreak (March 15 to April 15, 2020). Clinical presentations and outcomes were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. The effect of COVID-19 on mortality was assessed by propensity score matching and with a multivariate logistic regression model.ResultsIn total, 187 patients were admitted for AMI, 111 with ST-segment elevation AMI and 76 with non-ST-segment elevation AMI. Of these, 32 (17%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. GRACE score, Killip-Kimball classification, and several inflammatory markers were significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients. Total and cardiovascular mortality were also significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients (25% vs 3.8% [P < .001] and 15.2% vs 1.8% [P = .001], respectively). GRACE score > 140 (OR, 23.45; 95%CI, 2.52–62.51; P = .005) and COVID-19 (OR, 6.61; 95%CI, 1.82-24.43; P = .02) were independent predictors of in-hospital death.ConclusionsDuring this pandemic, a high GRACE score and COVID-19 were independent risk factors associated with higher in-hospital mortality.Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en     

Effects of 12 weeks of probiotic supplementation on quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: A double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundProbiotics may help resolve bowel symptoms and improve quality of life. We investigated the effects of 12 weeks of probiotics administration in colorectal cancer patients.MethodsWe conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The participants took probiotics (Lacidofil) or placebo twice a day for 12 weeks. The cancer-related quality of life (FACT), patient's health-9 (PHQ-9), and bowel symptom questionnaires were completed by each participant.ResultsWe obtained data for 32 participants in the placebo group and 28 participants in the probiotics group. The mean ages of total participants were 56.18 ± 8.86 years and 58.3% were male. Administration of probiotics significantly decreased the proportion of patients suffering from irritable bowel symptoms (0 week vs. 12 week; 67.9% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.03), improved colorectal cancer-related FACT (baseline vs. 12 weeks: 19.79 ± 4.66 vs. 21.18 ± 3.67, p = 0.04) and fatigue-related FACT (baseline vs. 12 weeks: 43.00 (36.50–45.50) vs. 44.50 (38.50–49.00), p = 0.02) and PHQ-9 scores (0 weeks vs. 12 weeks; 3.00 (0–8.00) vs. 1.00 (0–3.00), p = 0.01). We found significant differences in changes of the proportion of patients with bowel symptoms (p < 0.05), functional well-being scores (p = 0.04) and cancer-related FACT scores (p = 0.04) between the two groups.ConclusionProbiotics improved bowel symptoms and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors.     

STEMI vs NSTEACS management trends in non-invasive hospital

ObjectivesTo compare the clinical features, management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS), in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.MethodsA total of 71 patients were enrolled in a longitudinal study at a tertiary hospital without cardiac catheterization facility. These data were collected from Saudi Project for Assessment of Coronary Events registry.ResultsTwenty-three patients with STEMI were compared to 48 patients with NSTEACS. Mean age for STEMI was younger, 57.4 ± 13.7 years compared to 63.2 ± 13.9 years respectively (p = 0.19). Forty-four percent arrived at the hospital by ambulance. History of hypertension and hyperlipidemia were more frequent in NSTEACS (p = 0.05), while both groups showed no difference in diabetes mellitus, 17% vs 22% and smoking, 30% vs 17%. In-hospital medications were: Aspirin (100%) both groups, Clopidogrel (91% vs 100%) (p = 0.03). There was more aggressive use of beta-blockers (74% vs 95%) (p = 0.01) and statins (87% vs 100%) (p = 0.01) in NSTEACS.In-hospital outcomes showed one recurrent myocardial infarction and one death in NSTEACS group (2%). Other outcome in the two groups showed recurrent ischemia (13% vs 29%) (p = 0.14) and cardiogenic shock (9% vs 2%) (p = 0.17). No stroke or major bleeding was reported in both groups.ConclusionNSTEACS patients in western province of KSA present at an older age are mostly males and have higher prevalence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia compared with STEMI patients. It is therefore important to identify patients with high-risk profile and put implement measures to reduce these factors.