Fluticasone propionate in asthma: a long term dose comparison study

Background: Few dose ranging studies have investigated optimal dosing with inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma. Aims: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate 100 or 200 µg twice daily in children with moderate to severe asthma for one year. Methods: One year, randomised, double blind, parallel group, multicentre study. Children aged 4–11 years (n = 528) with moderate to severe asthma who had previously received high dose inhaled corticosteroids were given fluticasone propionate 100 or 200 µg twice daily for the 52 week treatment period. Efficacy (exacerbations, lung function, and symptoms) and tolerability (adverse events and cortisol levels) were measured. Results: There was a non-significant decreased risk of experiencing an exacerbation at any time with fluticasone propionate 200 µg twice daily compared with fluticasone propionate 100 µg twice daily. This difference reached significance among patients with more severe asthma (defined by previous inhaled corticosteroid dose >800 µg/day). Daily record card morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) in the total population improved significantly more with the higher dose of fluticasone propionate (between group difference, weeks 1–52: 11.4 l/min). Clinic visit mean PEF improved from baseline with both doses, but the response was significantly greater with the higher dose (between group difference, week 52: 17.8 l/min). Both doses were equally well tolerated and overnight urinary cortisol concentrations were unchanged or slightly increased during treatment with either dose. Conclusion: This long term dose comparison study shows that treatment with fluticasone propionate 200 µg twice daily may offer benefits over a lower dose, particularly in children with more severe asthma.     

Systematic review of the dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone propionate.

AIMS: To examine the dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone for both efficacy and adrenal function in children with asthma. METHODS: Systematic review of double blind randomised dose-response studies of fluticasone in children of at least 4 weeks duration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FEV1, morning peak expiratory flow, night awakenings, beta agonist use, major exacerbations, 12 or 24 hour urinary cortisol, peak plasma cortisol post-stimulation. RESULTS: Seven studies of 1733 children with asthma met the inclusion criteria for efficacy. The dose-response curve for each efficacy outcome measure suggested that the response began to plateau between 100 and 200 microg per day with additional efficacy at the 400 microg per day dose shown in one study of severe asthmatics. Five studies of 1096 children with asthma met the inclusion criteria for assessment of adrenal function. The largest placebo controlled study of 437 children reported no difference in 24 hour urinary cortisol between placebo and fluticasone at doses of 100 and 200 microg per day. The non-placebo controlled study of 528 children reported significant suppression of overnight urinary cortisol levels with fluticasone at 400 compared with 200 microg per day. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient data to determine the dose-response of fluticasone in children at doses >400 microg per day. The dose-response curve for fluticasone appears to plateau between 100 and 200 microg per day for efficacy. There was additional efficacy at the 400 microg per day dose in children with severe asthma; however there was evidence of adrenal suppression at this dose.     

The role of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids offer a wide range of anti-inflammatory activity and have consistently proved to be the most effective medication for the control of childhood asthma. The high efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids has led to their use in milder disease and younger children in the hope that permanent changes in lung function and airway remodelling may be prevented. However, evidence has emerged over the past six years that the first of the inhaled corticosteroids to become available, beclomethasone dipropionate, may cause growth deceleration at a dose of 400 microg per day. This is especially apparent in children with mild symptoms. The newest of the inhaled corticosteroids to be developed, fluticasone propionate, is equipotent to older compounds at half the dose and in low doses is superior in efficacy to sodium cromoglycate. Two recent studies have shown that fluticasone propionate 100-200 microg per day does not cause growth suppression in children with mild asthma. The long term outcome for children who wheeze in early life is difficult to predict. For this reason the use of inhaled corticosteroids in very young children is best reserved for those with severe symptoms or a strong family history of asthma, and evidence, from measurement of inflammatory markers, of airway inflammation.     

Effects of 2 inhaled corticosteroids on growth: results of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term effect of treatment with fluticasone propionate or beclomethasone dipropionate on growth in asthmatic children. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. SETTING: Children requiring regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and with a sexual maturity rating of Tanner stage 1 (prepubertal). PATIENTS: Three hundred forty-three children aged 4 to 11 years with asthma. The growth population (excluding patients with protocol violations likely to affect growth measurements) included 277 patients. INTERVENTIONS: Fluticasone propionate or beclomethasone dipropionate, both at a dosage of 200 microg administered twice daily via a dry powder inhaler (Diskhaler) for 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Growth velocity, lung function, and serum and urinary cortisol levels. RESULTS: The adjusted mean growth velocity in the fluticasone group was significantly greater than that in the beclomethasone group (5.01 [SE, 0.14] vs 4.10 [SE, 0.15] cm/y; difference, 0.91 cm; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.20 cm; P<.001). Both treatments improved lung function, with significant differences in favor of fluticasone. Adverse events were similar in both groups, and there were no significant differences in effect on serum and urinary cortisol levels. CONCLUSIONS: The more favorable risk-benefit ratio of fluticasone indicates that this agent is preferable to beclomethasone for the long-term treatment of children with asthma, especially if moderate doses are required.     

Decreased cortisol response to insulin induced hypoglycaemia in asthmatics treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate.

AIMS: To assess adrenal function in asthmatic children treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate for up to 16 weeks. METHODS: Children with asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine were treated with inhaled fluticasone 250-750 microg/day via Volumatic spacer. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) was performed to assess adrenal function. RESULTS: Eighteen asthmatic patients (10 boys, 8 girls), aged 7-17 years received inhaled fluticasone therapy at a median dose of 477 microg/m2 per day for 5-16 weeks. Adrenal suppression, defined as 60 minute serum cortisol less than 500 nmol/l, was found in 9 of 18 children. Following the ITT, the median basal and 60 minute serum cortisol concentrations of the suppressed group were 135.0 and 350.0 nmol/l, respectively; the corresponding values for the unsuppressed group were 242.2 and 564.7 nmol/l. Repeat ITT in the suppressed group 2-3 months after discontinuation of fluticasone revealed that all patients had a 60 minute serum cortisol greater than 500 nmol/l. CONCLUSION: After therapy for asthma with inhaled fluticasone at approximately 500 microg daily for up to 16 weeks, half the children had evidence of adrenal suppression.     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/day with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in mild and moderate asthma.

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of a new inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate at a total daily dose of 200 micrograms, with beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in childhood asthma. A total of 398 asthmatic children (aged 4-19 years) were randomised to receive either fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms daily or beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms daily for six weeks inhaled via a spacer device from a metered dose inhaler. During the study the patients recorded morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), symptom scores, and use of beta 2 agonist rescue medication. In addition, clinic visit PEFR and forced expiratory volume in one second were measured. Safety was assessed by recording all adverse events and by performing routine biochemistry and haematology screens including plasma cortisol concentration before and after treatment. For the purposes of analysis the diary card data were grouped into three periods: week 3 (days 15-21), week 6 (days 36-42), and weeks 1-6 (days 1-42). The results showed no significant difference between treatments on most efficacy parameters. However, there were significant differences in changes from baseline in favour of fluticasone propionate for % predicted morning PEFR both at week 3 (fluticasone propionate 6.1%, beclomethasone dipropionate 3.9%) and at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 8.3%, beclomethasone dipropionate 5. 9%) and % predicted evening PEFR at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 7.3%, beclomethasone dipropionate 4.9% and over weeks 1-6 (fluticasone propionate 5.5%, beclomethasone dipropionate 3.6%. Comparison between groups showed that the group receiving fluticasone propionate had a lower % of days with symptom-free exercise at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 87%, beclomethasone dipropionate 81%) and % days without rescue medication at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 87%, beclomethasone dipropionate 80%) and over weeks 1-6 (fluticasone propionate 80%, beclomethasone dipropionate 73%). Except for a higher incidence of sore throat in the fluticasone propionate group, the two treatments did not differ with regard to safety. There was no evidence of adrenal suppression with either treatment. In conclusion, fluticasone propionate 200 microgram daily ws at least as effective and as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate 400 microgram daily in childhood asthma.     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/day with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in mild and moderate asthma

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of a new inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate at a total daily dose of 200 micrograms, with beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in childhood asthma. A total of 398 asthmatic children (aged 4-19 years) were randomised to receive either fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms daily or beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms daily for six weeks inhaled via a spacer device from a metered dose inhaler. During the study the patients recorded morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), symptom scores, and use of beta 2 agonist rescue medication. In addition, clinic visit PEFR and forced expiratory volume in one second were measured. Safety was assessed by recording all adverse events and by performing routine biochemistry and haematology screens including plasma cortisol concentration before and after treatment. For the purposes of analysis the diary card data were grouped into three periods: week 3 (days 15-21), week 6 (days 36-42), and weeks 1-6 (days 1-42). The results showed no significant difference between treatments on most efficacy parameters. However, there were significant differences in changes from baseline in favour of fluticasone propionate for % predicted morning PEFR both at week 3 (fluticasone propionate 6.1%, beclomethasone dipropionate 3.9%) and at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 8.3%, beclomethasone dipropionate 5. 9%) and % predicted evening PEFR at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 7.3%, beclomethasone dipropionate 4.9% and over weeks 1-6 (fluticasone propionate 5.5%, beclomethasone dipropionate 3.6%. Comparison between groups showed that the group receiving fluticasone propionate had a lower % of days with symptom-free exercise at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 87%, beclomethasone dipropionate 81%) and % days without rescue medication at week 6 (fluticasone propionate 87%, beclomethasone dipropionate 80%) and over weeks 1-6 (fluticasone propionate 80%, beclomethasone dipropionate 73%). Except for a higher incidence of sore throat in the fluticasone propionate group, the two treatments did not differ with regard to safety. There was no evidence of adrenal suppression with either treatment. In conclusion, fluticasone propionate 200 microgram daily ws at least as effective and as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate 400 microgram daily in childhood asthma.     

Fluticasone propionate in children and infants with asthma]

The known efficacy of fluticasone propionate in adults, comparable at half-dosage of corticosteroids has been validated by the market authorization (MA) and by the national and international guidelines for beclomethasone. This could be partly explained by its pharmacological properties, affinity for glucocorticosteroid receptors, lung deposition and lipophilicity. The limited systemic adverse events is due to its low bioavailability, optimal hepatic clearance, high plasma protein binding. The efficacy in asthmatic children has been confirmed in clinical studies showing a "plateau" efficacy between 100 and 200 microg/d for the majority of children. Most children are controlled by such dosages: the added value of increasing posology on asthma control exists but is small. A high off-label posology does not allow more quickly asthma control and therefore is not justified. A twice daily dosing is more efficient, particularly for initiation of maintenance therapy, than a once daily dosing. A literature survey confirms that, at MA recommended daily doses in children (100-200 microg), fluticasone propionate has no clinically significant effect either on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (basal function or stimulation tests), bone or growth velocity. However, high daily doses (higher to 500 microg/day) for long periods expose to systemic adverse effects with measurable consequences on growth rate, bone density (decreasing biochemical makers of bone formation) and HPA function. Several cases of adrenal insufficiency that may have led to acute adrenal crisis have been reported in 4- to 10-year-old children receiving fluticasone propionate in doses between 500 to 2000 microg daily. In case of surgery or infection, a preventive treatment of adrenal insufficiency with hydrocortisone should be proposed for children treated for more than 6 months with such high daily doses. Such children need definitely an advice from paediatricians specialized in chest diseases as well as in endocrinology. It is important to recall that the clinical benefit of daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids higher than recommended is low and that the good use of inhaled corticosteroids particularly in children lays on the careful search of the minimal efficient daily doses.     

Persistent wheezing in infants with an atopic tendency responds to inhaled fluticasone.

BACKGROUND: The role of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of wheeze in infancy remains unclear. AIM: To investigate the effect of inhaled fluticasone on symptoms in a group of wheezy infants who had a high risk of progressing to childhood asthma. METHODS: A total of 52 infants, under 1 year of age, with a history of wheeze or cough and a history (personal or first degree relative) of atopy were prescribed either 150 microg fluticasone twice daily (group F) or placebo (group P), via metered dose inhaler, for 12 weeks following a two week run in period. Symptoms were scored in a parent held diary and the mean daily symptom score (MDS) and symptom free days (SFD) calculated for each two week period. RESULTS: Thirty seven infants completed the study. Both MDS and SFD improved significantly between the run in and final two week period in group F, but not group P, with a mean difference in change (95% CI) between groups of 1.12 (0.05 to 2.18) for MDS and median difference of 3.0 (0.002 to 8.0) for SFD. CONCLUSION: Improvement of clinical symptoms in response to fluticasone can be shown in this high risk group of infants. In the absence of effective alternatives inhaled corticosteroids should be considered in this patient group.     

Systematic review of the dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone propionate

Aims: To examine the dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone for both efficacy and adrenal function in children with asthma. Methods: Systematic review of double blind randomised dose-response studies of fluticasone in children of at least 4 weeks duration. Main outcome measures: FEV₁, morning peak expiratory flow, night awakenings, ß agonist use, major exacerbations, 12 or 24 hour urinary cortisol, peak plasma cortisol post-stimulation. Results: Seven studies of 1733 children with asthma met the inclusion criteria for efficacy. The dose-response curve for each efficacy outcome measure suggested that the response began to plateau between 100 and 200 µg per day with additional efficacy at the 400 µg per day dose shown in one study of severe asthmatics. Five studies of 1096 children with asthma met the inclusion criteria for assessment of adrenal function. The largest placebo controlled study of 437 children reported no difference in 24 hour urinary cortisol between placebo and fluticasone at doses of 100 and 200 µg per day. The non-placebo controlled study of 528 children reported significant suppression of overnight urinary cortisol levels with fluticasone at 400 compared with 200 µg per day. Conclusions: There is insufficient data to determine the dose-response of fluticasone in children at doses >400 µg per day. The dose-response curve for fluticasone appears to plateau between 100 and 200 µg per day for efficacy. There was additional efficacy at the 400 µg per day dose in children with severe asthma; however there was evidence of adrenal suppression at this dose.     

Budesonide/formoterol improves lung function compared with budesonide alone in children with asthma.

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) with budesonide alone (Pulmicort) or budesonide (Pulmicort) and formoterol (Oxis) administered via separate inhalers in children with asthma. In a 12 wk, double-blind study, a total of 630 children with asthma (mean age 8 yr [4-11 yr]; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 92% predicted; mean inhaled corticosteroid dose 454 microg/day) were randomized to: budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily); a corresponding dose of budesonide alone (100 microg, two inhalations twice daily); or a corresponding dose of budesonide (100 microg, two inhalations twice daily) and formoterol (4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily) (budesonide + formoterol in separate inhalers). The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to treatment (average of the 12-wk treatment period) in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). Other changes in lung function and asthma symptoms were assessed, as was safety. Budesonide/formoterol significantly improved morning PEF, evening PEF and FEV(1) compared with budesonide (all p < 0.001); there was no significant difference between budesonide/formoterol and budesonide + formoterol in separate inhalers for these variables. All other diary card variables improved from baseline in all treatment groups; there were no significant between-group differences. Adverse-event profiles were similar in all groups; there were no serious asthma-related adverse events in any treatment group. Conclusion: budesonide/formoterol significantly improved lung function in children (aged 4-11 yr) with asthma compared with budesonide alone. Budesonide/formoterol is a safe and effective treatment option for children with asthma.     

Decreased cortisol response to insulin induced hypoglycaemia in asthmatics treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate

Aims: To assess adrenal function in asthmatic children treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate for up to 16 weeks. Methods: Children with asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine were treated with inhaled fluticasone 250–750 µg/day via Volumatic spacer. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) was performed to assess adrenal function. Results: Eighteen asthmatic patients (10 boys, 8 girls), aged 7–17 years received inhaled fluticasone therapy at a median dose of 477 µg/m² per day for 5–16 weeks. Adrenal suppression, defined as 60 minute serum cortisol less than 500 nmol/l, was found in 9 of 18 children. Following the ITT, the median basal and 60 minute serum cortisol concentrations of the suppressed group were 135.0 and 350.0 nmol/l, respectively; the corresponding values for the unsuppressed group were 242.2 and 564.7 nmol/l. Repeat ITT in the suppressed group 2–3 months after discontinuation of fluticasone revealed that all patients had a 60 minute serum cortisol greater than 500 nmol/l. Conclusion: After therapy for asthma with inhaled fluticasone at approximately 500 µg daily for up to 16 weeks, half the children had evidence of adrenal suppression.     

No effect of fluticasone propionate on linear growth in preschool children with asthma

Background: Eighty percent of asthmatic children develop asthma symptoms by the age of 5 years. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), depending on dosage, may cause linear growth reduction and adrenal gland suppression. There are few studies about linear growth of preschool children with asthma. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether there is any effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) on linear growth and adrenal gland function. Methods: Twenty‐eight children aged 18–52 months with persistent asthma receiving ICS FP 100–200 µg daily were studied for 1 year. Patients were divided into two groups according to clinical parameters: well (group 1) and poorly controlled (group 2). Height was measured every 3 months and expressed as height standard deviation score (SDS). Cumulative dose of FP expressed in mg was calculated for every patient. Early morning levels of serum adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol were assessed at the beginning and at the end of the study. Results: Patients took FP for an average of 11 months in group 1 and 16 months in group 2, which was not statistically significantly different. At the end of the study height SDS difference was ?0.0143 in group 1 and ?0.2000 in group 2, which was not statistically significantly different (t= 0.6072, P= 0.5489). There was also no statistically significant difference for average cortisol (P= 0.4381) or ACTH (P= 0.5845) concentration at the end of the study. Conclusion: FP 100–200 µg daily had no effect on linear growth or on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal gland axis but further follow up is necessary.     

A randomised controlled trial of short term growth and collagen turnover in asthmatics treated with inhaled formoterol and budesonide.

AIMS: To determine effects on short term growth and collagen turnover of adding formoterol (Eformoterol) to half the glucocorticoid dose in children with asthma, treated with inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler). DESIGN: A randomised double blind, placebo controlled crossover study with two six-week periods. SETTING: Outpatient clinic in secondary referral centre. SUBJECTS: A total of 27 prepubertal children aged 6-13 years. INTERVENTIONS: Formoterol 12 microg and dry powder budesonide 100 microg twice daily in one period; placebo and dry powder budesonide 200 microg twice daily in the other. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were lower leg growth rate, and serum and urine markers of type I and type III collagen turnover. Secondary outcome measures were inflammation markers in serum, and parameters of asthma control. RESULTS: During budesonide 200 microg twice daily treatment, mean lower leg growth rate was 0.14 mm/week (p = 0.02) lower than during the formoterol and budesonide period. Similar statistically significant effects on markers of collagen turnover were found, whereas inflammation markers and asthma control did not vary statistically significantly between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: In children treated with inhaled glucocorticoids, halving the dose and adding formoterol is associated with faster short term growth and an increase in markers of collagen turnover, with no loss of asthma control.     

Persistent wheezing in infants with an atopic tendency responds to inhaled fluticasone

BACKGROUND—The role of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of wheeze in infancy remains unclear.AIM—To investigate the effect of inhaled fluticasone on symptoms in a group of wheezy infants who had a high risk of progressing to childhood asthma.METHODS—A total of 52 infants, under 1 year of age, with a history of wheeze or cough and a history (personal or first degree relative) of atopy were prescribed either 150 µg fluticasone twice daily (group F) or placebo (group P), via metered dose inhaler, for 12 weeks following a two week run in period. Symptoms were scored in a parent held diary and the mean daily symptom score (MDS) and symptom free days (SFD) calculated for each two week period.RESULTS—Thirty seven infants completed the study. Both MDS and SFD improved significantly between the run in and final two week period in group F, but not group P, with a mean difference in change (95% CI) between groups of 1.12 (0.05 to 2.18) for MDS and median difference of 3.0 (0.002 to 8.0) for SFD.CONCLUSION—Improvement of clinical symptoms in response to fluticasone can be shown in this high risk group of infants. In the absence of effective alternatives inhaled corticosteroids should be considered in this patient group.     

Effect of formoterol on clinical parameters and lung functions in patients with bronchial asthma: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS: To determine the role of formoterol in the treatment of children with bronchial asthma who are symptomatic despite regular use of inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: A randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled study to investigate the effects of inhaled formoterol (12 microg twice a day) in 32 children with moderate to severe bronchial asthma. The study consisted of two week run in periods and six week treatment periods, during both of which the patients continued their regular anti-inflammatory drugs. The efficacy parameters were symptom scores, bronchodilator use, daily peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), methacholine hyper-reactivity, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), lung volumes, and airway conductance. RESULTS: Formoterol treatment for six weeks decreased symptom scores, PEFR variability, and the number of rescue salbutamol doses, and increased morning and evening PEFR significantly. No adverse reactions were seen. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that inhaled formoterol is effective in controlling chronic asthma symptoms in children who are symptomatic despite regular use of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate vs. double dose fluticasone propionate on lung function and asthma control in children

There is a large body of data to support the use of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus a long‐acting β₂‐agonist vs. increasing the dose of ICS in adults, but less data in children. This double‐blind, parallel group, non‐inferiority study compared lung function and asthma control, based on Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines, in children receiving either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFC) 50/100 μg bd (n = 160) or fluticasone propionate (FP) 200 μg bd (n = 161) for 12 wks. Change from baseline in mean morning peak expiratory flow increased following both treatments, but was significantly greater in the SFC group compared with FP [Adjusted mean change (s.e.) (l/min): SFC: 26.9 (2.13), FP: 19.3 (2.12); treatment difference: 7.6 (3.01); 95% CI: 1.7, 13.5; p = 0.012)]. Asthma control improved over time in both groups. Mean pre‐bronchodilator maximal‐expiratory flow at 50% vital capacity and percentage rescue‐free days showed significantly greater improvements in the SFC group compared with FP. All other efficacy indices showed comparable improvements in each group. Treatment with SFC 50/100 μg bd compared with twice the steroid dose of FP (200 μg bd), was at least as effective in improving individual clinical outcomes and overall asthma control, in asthmatic children previously uncontrolled on low doses of ICS.     

Adrenal function in children with severe asthma treated with high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids: recommended screening tests in outpatient conditions

BACKGROUND: A number of previous studies have suggested that adrenal suppression occurs in asthmatic children treated with high-doses of inhaled glucocorticoids (IGC). This study was designed to determine the frequency of adrenal suppression in children with severe asthma treated with recommended doses of IGC: namely 500-1,000 microg/day of fluticasone propionate or the equivalent of budesonide (1,000-2,000 microg/day) for a period of at least 12 months. METHODS: Early morning cortisol (F) and ACTH serum levels were measured in 27 severe asthmatics aged 6-16 years old. The children underwent a low dose ACTH test (1 microg/1.73 m2) with a parallel glucose measurement. Twenty-four hour urine collection was performed before examination for free F (UfF) and creatinine levels. There were no clinical manifestations of adrenal hypofunction in the analyzed children. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients, 22 had normal basal and post-stimulatory levels of F and normal UfF, and the other five (18.5%) had basal serum F levels of <400 nmol/l. Four of the five also had normal post-stimulatory levels of F and normal UfF. One child had a subnormal peak F value of 484 nmol/l during the ACTH test. None of the patients had a suppressed serum ACTH level, but an elevated ACTH level was found in four children. This study provided biochemical evidence of suboptimal adrenal function in one child in the examined group (3.7%) and a good response to stimulation in all the others, even in those with slightly reduced basal cortisol levels. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the use of fluticasone in doses of up to 1,000 microg/day (or the equivalent of budesonide) as long-term treatment of children with severe asthma did not substantially affect their adrenal function.     

�����͵����ϸ�Ī������˫�����������͵¸ɷ������Ʒ��Զ�ͯ��ȳ�������������Ч�۲�

目的观察布地耐德(BUD)联用福莫特罗(FOM)与单用双倍剂量BUD干粉吸入疗法对轻度持续性哮喘患儿的有效性和安全性,探讨儿童轻度持续性哮喘的理想治疗方案。方法选取2005-01—2005-06在广州医学院附属第一医院呼研所专科门诊就诊的轻度持续哮喘患儿50例,采取开放、随机、平行对照方法把50例患儿分为两组,分别吸入BUD联用FOM(B+F组)或双倍剂量BUD(Double B组)8周,药物均用都保干粉吸入装置吸入。8周的观察期内由患儿或家长记录哮喘日记,包括日间和夜间症状评分、无症状天数、其它平喘药物(包括应急用速效β2-受体激动剂、长效缓释茶碱、口服长效β2-受体激动剂、全身用糖皮质激素)使用情况,同时以简易峰流速仪监测其呼气峰流速值(PEF)作为主要肺功能指标。结果B+F组和Double B组在治疗8周后,日间症状及PEF均较治疗前明显改善,无症状天数明显增加,差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);与治疗前比较,B+F组在治疗8周后夜间症状评分明显下降(P<0.05),而Double B组治疗前后比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组间日间症状评分、夜间症状评分、无症状天数及PEF治疗前及治疗后比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组间病情反复发作次数、需联合应用速效β2-受体激动剂次数及口服强的松、长效缓释茶碱或口服长效β2-受体激动剂的天数均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论低剂量吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)联用长效β2-受体激动剂(LABA)与单用双倍剂量ICS治疗儿童轻度持续性哮喘的疗效相当。但从减少或避免ICS潜在的全身性副反应方面考虑,联用低剂量ICS+LABA可能是更好的选择。     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide 160 μg once daily vs. budesonide 400 μg once daily in children with asthma

Ciclesonide is an onsite-activated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for the treatment of asthma. This study compared the efficacy, safety and effect on quality of life (QOL) of ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator; nominal dose 200 microg) vs. budesonide 400 microg (nominal dose) in children with asthma. Six hundred and twenty-one children (aged 6-11 yr) with asthma were randomized to receive ciclesonide 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily (via hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler and AeroChamber Plus spacer) or budesonide 400 microg once daily (via Turbohaler) both given in the evening for 12 wk. The primary efficacy end-point was change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Additional measurements included change in daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), change in asthma symptom score sum, change in use of rescue medication, paediatric and caregiver asthma QOL questionnaire [PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ, respectively] scores, change in body height assessed by stadiometry, change in 24-h urinary cortisol adjusted for creatinine and adverse events. Both ciclesonide and budesonide increased FEV1, morning PEF and PAQLQ(S) and PACQLQ scores, and improved asthma symptom score sums and the need for rescue medication after 12 wk vs. baseline. The non-inferiority of ciclesonide vs. budesonide was demonstrated for the change in FEV1 (95% confidence interval: -75, 10 ml, p = 0.0009, one-sided non-inferiority, per-protocol). In addition, ciclesonide and budesonide showed similar efficacy in improving asthma symptoms, morning PEF, use of rescue medication and QOL. Ciclesonide was superior to budesonide with regard to increases in body height (p = 0.003, two-sided). The effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis was significantly different in favor of ciclesonide treatment (p < 0.001, one-sided). Both ciclesonide and budesonide were well tolerated. Ciclesonide 160 microg once daily and budesonide 400 microg once daily were effective in children with asthma. In addition, in children treated with ciclesonide there was significantly less reduction in body height and suppression of 24-h urinary cortisol excretion compared with children treated with budesonide after 12 wk.