Extracranial insults and outcome in patients with acute head injury--relationship to the Glasgow Coma Scale

Hypoxia and hypotension are extracranial insults known to have an adverse effect on the outcome of patients with acute head injury. Arterial oxygen tension, blood pressure and the Glasgow Coma Score on admission of 67 patients seen over a 6-month period were correlated with the outcome at 6 months. With a given level of consciousness the presence of an extracranial insult resulted in a worse outcome than would be predicted. The combination of hypoxia and hypotension was uniformly fatal as was the presence of severe respiratory dysfunction.     

Glasgow Coma Scale score, mortality, and functional outcome in head-injured patients

BACKGROUND: Preresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (P-GCS) score is frequently obtained in injured patients and incorporated into mortality prediction. Data on functional outcome in head injury is sparse. A large group of patients with head injuries was analyzed to assess relationships between P-GCS score, mortality, and functional outcome as measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). METHODS: Records for patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes indicating head injury in a statewide trauma registry between 1994 and 2002 were selected. P-GCS score, mortality, and FIM score at hospital discharge were integrated and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 138,750 patients, 22,924 patients were used for the mortality study and 7,150 patients for the FIM study. A good correlation exists between P-GCS score and FIM, as determined by rank correlation coefficients, whereas mortality falls steeply between a P-GCS score of 3 and a P-GCS score of 7 followed by a shallow fall. Although P-GCS score is related to mortality in head-injured patients, its relationship is nonlinear, which casts doubt on its use as a continuous measure or an equivalent set of categorical measures incorporated into outcome prediction models. The average FIM scores indicate substantial likelihood of good outcomes in survivors with low P-GCS scores, further complicating the use of the P-GCS score in the prediction of poor outcome at the time of initial patient evaluation. CONCLUSION: Although the P-GCS score is related to functional outcome as measured by the FIM score and mortality in head injury, current mortality prediction models may need to be modified to account for the nonlinear relationship between P-GCS score and mortality. The P-GCS score is not a good clinical tool for outcome prediction in individual head-injured patients, given the variability in mortality rates and functional outcomes at all scores.     

Cerebral hypoxia in severely brain-injured patients is associated with admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, computed tomographic severity, cerebral perfusion pressure, and survival

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of cerebral hypoxia with admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, brain computed tomographic (CT) severity, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and survival in patients with severe brain injury. METHODS: CPP and noninvasive transcranial oximetry (Stco2) were recorded hourly for 6 days in patients with a GCS score < or = 8 (3,722 observations). CT score was derived from midline shift (0/1) plus abnormal cisterns (0/1) plus subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (0/1) (range, 0-3). RESULTS: Brain CT results were as follows: shift, 10 (56%); abnormal cisterns, 14 (78%); SAH, 9 (50%); epidural hematoma, 2 (11%); subdural hematoma, 11 (61%); and contusion, 17 (94%). The incidences of Stco2 < 60 were: GCS score 3-4, 26.5%; GCS score 5-7, 12.4%; and GCS score 8, 2.8% (p < 0.0001); CT score 2/3, 26.4%; and CT score 0/1, 10.0% (p < 0.0001); nonsurvivors 36.1%; and survivors 16.3% (p < 0.0001). For incidence of CPP < 70, the results were as follows: Stco2 < 60%, 33% of observations; Stco2 > or = 60%, 10% of observations (odds ratio, 4.3; p < 0.01). Despite CPP > or = 70, Stco2 < 60 incidence was 16% of observations. CONCLUSION: Cerebral hypoxia is common, even with CPP > or = 70, and is associated with GCS score, CT scan severity, and mortality. Cerebral hypoxia is related to cerebral hypoperfusion. Additional studies may prove that Stco2 monitoring will enhance the treatment of severe brain injury.     

Physician knowledge of the Glasgow Coma Scale

Appropriate triage is critical to optimizing outcome from battle related injuries. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is the primary means by which combat casualties, who have suffered head injury, are triaged. For the GCS to be reliable in this critical role, it must be applied accurately. To determine the level of knowledge of the GCS among military physicians with exposure and/or training in the scale we administered a prospective, voluntary, and anonymous survey to physicians of all levels of training at military medical centers with significant patient referral base. The main outcome measures were correct identification of title and categories of the GCS along with appropriate scoring of each category. Overall performance on the survey was marginal. Many were able to identify what "GCS" stands for, but far fewer were able to identify the titles of the specific categories, let alone identify the specific scoring of each category. When evaluated based on medical specialties, those in surgical specialties outperformed those in the medical specialties. When comparing the different levels of training, residents and fellows performed better than attending staff or interns. Finally, those with Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) certification performed significantly better than those without the training. Physician knowledge of the GCS, as demonstrated in this study, is poor, even in a population of individuals with specific training in the use of the scale. It is concluded that, to optimize outcome from combat related head injury, methods for improving accurate quantitation of neurologic state need to be explored.     

Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury

Even 30 years after its first publication the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is still used worldwide to describe and assess coma. The GCS consists of three components, the ocular, motor and verbal response to standardized stimulation, and is used as a severity of illness indicator for coma of various origins. The GCS facilitates information transfer and monitoring changes in coma. In addition, it is used as a triage tool in patients with traumatic brain injury. Its prognostic value regarding the outcome after a traumatic brain injury still lacks evidence. One of the main problems is the evaluation of the GCS in sedated, paralysed and/or intubated patients. A multitude of pseudoscores exists but a universal definition has yet to be defined.     

The Glasgow Coma Scale: A mathematical critique

Summary The Glasgow Coma Scale permits 120 possible mathematical combinations of eye, verbal and motor scores. Out of these only about 15 are clinically valid and useful in the assessment of altered consciousness. A mathematical analysis of this pruned scale shows a predominant skew towards the motor response. Without clinically altering, the scale. The numerical values can be modified to produce a more equitable dominance by each of the factors and greater precision. This is also necessary as the value of a unit is the same in the sum score, whether contributed by the eye, verbal or motor elements.     

A practical review of the Glasgow Coma Scale and Score

Since the Glasgow Coma Scale was introduced in 1974,(1) it has become the most common method of describing a patient's level of consciousness. However, despite its almost universal use, there remain a number of misunderstandings, particularly regarding the appropriate situations in which to use the Glasgow Coma Score rather than the Scale, and also in the correct way to elicit and record the motor responses. This article, aimed at non-neurosurgeons, addresses these problems, and provides a reference for those wishing to learn or teach the Glasgow Coma Scale and Score.     

A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Swedish Reaction Level Scale

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Swedish Reaction Level Scale (RLS85), two level-of-consciousness scales used in the assessment of patients with head injury, were compared in a prospective study of 239 patients admitted to a regional head injury unit over a 4-month period. Assessments were made by nine staff members ranging from house officer to registrar, after briefing about the two scales. Data were also collected on age, nature of injuries, surgical treatment, and condition at discharge or transfer using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Both the GCS and the RLS85 reliably identified comatose patients and those with minor head injury, but were much less effective in defining the response level in patients considered to have a moderate head injury. Only 41% of the patients allocated to a moderate-head-injury category by the GCS and the RLS85 were common to both groups. Where a mismatch occurred, neither scale allocated patients to a 'better' or 'worse' category more frequently than the other. Assessment of patients' conscious levels using the GCS was difficult in only two cases. One patient had facial injuries, and the other was intubated. The RLS85 was reported by all users to be simpler to use than the GCS, but the latter is much more widespread in use. Both scales function well in cases of severe and minor head injury, but have weaknesses when defining moderate head injury. Level-of-consciousness scales are only an aid to assessment and the final choice between the two scales must remain a matter of personal or departmental preference.     

Problems of the Glasgow Coma Scale with early intubated patients

The Glasgow Coma Scale is probably the most common grading scale in neurotraumatology all over the world. Its validity concerning severity and prognosis of the injury has been established in the Anglo-American literature. Data derived from the German rescue system, however is different from the Anglo-American in some respects. The analysis of a well-defined group of German trauma patients with moderate and severe head injuries (n=299) shows that low Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS 3–6) established during the first two posttraumatic days must not correspond directly to the outcome after one year. Especially for the best Glasgow Coma Score during the day after the injury, GCS 4 had a poorer collective long-term prognosis than GCS 3. Therefore, German data from head injury studies based on the Glasgow Coma Scoring are difficult to compare to those cited in the Anglo-American literature. Any statistical analysis of a so called ranking scale which does not satisfy its own claims under special conditions is difficult.     

Effect of alcohol on Glasgow Coma Scale in head-injured patients

OBJECTIVE: Almost 50% of traumatic brain-injured (TBI) patients are alcohol intoxicated. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is frequently used to direct diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in these patients. It is commonly assumed that alcohol intoxication reduces GCS, thus limiting its utility in intoxicated patients. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the presence of blood alcohol has a clinically significant impact on GCS in TBI patients. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank of the American College of Surgeons was queried (1994-2003). Patients 18 to 45 years of age with blunt injury mechanism, whose GCS in the emergency department, survival status, anatomic severity of TBI (Head Abbreviated Injury Score [AIS]), and blood alcohol testing status were known, were included. GCS of patients who tested positive for alcohol (n = 55,732) was compared with GCS of patients who tested negative (n = 53,197), stratified by head AIS. RESULTS: Groups were similar in age (31 +/- 8 vs. 30 +/- 8 years), Injury Severity Score (ISS; 12 +/- 11 vs. 12 +/- 11), systolic blood pressure in the ED (131 +/- 25 vs. 134 +/- 25 mm Hg), TRISS (Trauma Injury Severity Score; probability of survival (94% +/- 16% vs. 95% +/- 15%), and actual survival (96% vs. 96%). When stratified by anatomic severity of TBI, the presence of alcohol did not lower GCS by more than 1 point in any head AIS group (GCS in alcohol-positive vs. alcohol-negative patients; AIS 1 = 13.9 +/- 2.8 vs. 14.3 +/- 2.3; AIS 2 = 13.4 +/- 3.2 vs. 14.1 +/- 2.4; AIS 3 = 11.1 +/- 4.7 vs. 11.6 +/- 4.6; AIS 4 = 9.8 +/- 4.9 vs. 10.4 +/- 4.9; AIS 5 = 5.5 +/- 3.8 vs. 5.9 +/- 4.1, AIS 6: 3.4 +/- 1.1 vs. 3.8 +/- 2.8). CONCLUSION: Alcohol use does not result in a clinically significant reduction in GCS in trauma patients. Attributing low GCS to alcohol intoxication in TBI patients may delay necessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.     

Prediction of neuropsychiatric outcome following mild trauma brain injury: an examination of the Glasgow Coma Scale

The relationship between the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and neuropsychiatric outcome was examined in 57 consecutive subjects with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) attending a follow-up clinic. Subjects were grouped according to initial GCS score (15 versus 13-14) and contrasted at an average of 5-6 months post-injury. As expected, those with GCS 13-14 had longer PTA (p = 0.001) and a higher rate of abnormal brain CT scans (p = 0.005). However, no significant differences emerged for indices of neuropsychiatric status, including measures of neurobehavioural symptoms/signs, overall psychological distress, psychiatric 'caseness', functional and psychosocial outcome, frequency of common somatic complaints, and rate of return to work. Subsidiary analyses based upon the presence/absence of CT abnormalities and the duration of PTA (<1 hour versus 1-24 hours) also failed to predict outcome, although a trend associating longer PTA with lower functional outcome was observed. Thus, despite early neurosurgical differences, the results suggest that initial GCS scores do not clearly translate into neuropsychiatric sequelae at follow-up within the rubric of GCS 13-15.     

Glasgow Coma Scale, brain electric activity mapping and Glasgow Outcome Scale after hyperbaric oxygen treatment of severe brain injury

ＳＤｅｐａｒｔｍｅｎｔｏｆＮｅｕｒｏｓｕｒｇｅｒｙ ,ＳｅｃｏｎｄＡｆｆｉｌｉａｔｅｄＨｏｓｐｉｔａｌ,ＬａｎｚｈｏｕＭｅｄｉｃａｌＣｏｌｌａｇｅ ,Ｌａｎｚｈｏｕ 730 0 30 ,Ｃｈｉｎａ (ＲｅｎＨＪ ,ＷａｎｇＷＰａｎｄＧｅＺＭ)ｉｎｃｅ 1980ｈｙｐｅｒｂａｒｉｃｏｘｙｇｅｎ (ＨＢＯ )ｔｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔｈａｓｂｅｅｎｗｉｄｅｌｙｕｓｅｄ .ＴｏｅｘｐｌｏｒｅｔｈｅｅｆｆｅｃｔｏｆＨＢＯｔｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔｉｎｓｅｖｅｒｅｂｒａｉｎｉｎｊｕｒｙ (ＳＢＩ)ｐａｔｉｅｎｔｓ ,ｗｅｏｂｓｅｒｖｅｄ 35ｃａｓｅｓｏｆＳＢ…     

Post-traumatic amnesia and Glasgow Coma Scale related to outcome in survivors in a consecutive series of patients with severe closed-head injury

A consecutive series of 93 severe closed-head injury (SCHI) patients, discharged from hospital in a conscious state, were rated on the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 and 12 months post-injury. Patients were included in this study if they had a period of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) exceeding 24 h. Approximately 80% of patients had made a good recovery by 12 months post-injury; a better outcome than has been found in studies using the presence of coma during the first 6 h post-admission to hospital to define severe head injury. When analysed individually, duration of PTA and Glasgow Coma Scale scores on admission to hospital were both strongly correlated with outcome. Only duration of PTA, however, contributed significantly to outcome variance when potential outcome predictors were assessed using a stepwise multiple regression analysis. The definition of severe head injury, the higher than usual incidence of good recovery in the present study, and the relationship between injury severity and outcome are discussed.     

Mortality by decade in trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale 3

The aim of this study was to assess how increasing age affects mortality in trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 3. The Los Angeles County Trauma System Database was queried for all patients aged 20 to 99 years admitted with GCS 3. Mortality was 41.8 per cent for the 3306 GCS 3 patients. Mortality in the youngest patients reviewed, those in the third decade, was 43.5 per cent. After logistic regression analysis, patients in the third decade had similar mortality rates to patients in the sixth (adjusted OR, 0.88; CI, 0.68 to 1.14; P = 0.33) and seventh decades (adjusted OR, 0.96; CI, 0.70 to 1.31; P = 0.79). A significantly lower mortality rate, however, was noted in the fifth decade (adjusted OR, 0.76; CI, 0.61 to 0.95; P = 0.02). Conversely, significantly higher mortality rates were noted in the eighth (adjusted OR, 1.93; CI, 1.38 to 2.71; P = 0.0001) and combined ninth/tenth decades (adjusted OR, 2.47; CI, 1.71 to 3.57; P < 0.0001). Given the high survival in trauma patients with GCS 3 as well as continued improvement in survival compared with historical controls, aggressive care is indicated for patients who present to the emergency department with GCS 3.     

Glasgow Coma Scale and laboratory markers are superior to COHb in predicting CO intoxication severity

Carbon monoxide (CO) intoxications can affect several organ systems and lead to coma or death in severe cases. To date, COHb is routinely used as a marker for detecting CO intoxication. In this retrospective study, we investigated 173 patients admitted with CO intoxication to our intensive care unit (ICU) over a period of 8 years. Standardised blood tests, chest X-ray and neurological status evaluation were performed on admission and throughout the inpatient treatment. The duration of inpatient treatment was considered to be an indication of the severity of CO-related illness. Interestingly, the data did not reveal a significant correlation between initial COHb level and the duration of inpatient treatment. Instead, a significant inverse correlation was found between the initial Glasgow Coma Scale and the duration of inpatient treatment. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between the duration of inpatient treatment and the occurrence of elevated leucocyte numbers, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) serum concentrations and the presence of lung infiltrates. In conclusion, we postulate that clinical parameters, such as the Glasgow Coma Scale and the laboratory markers CRP and leucocyte count are adequate supportive tools for evaluating the severity of CO-related illness, and further, that the measurement of COHb alone is insufficient for this purpose.     

A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85)

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85) were compared for rating neurosurgical patients in regard to ranking order of deficit severity, interobserver variability, and coverage for relevant factors. Four physicians, four registered nurses, and four assistant nurses performed 72 pairwise ratings on 47 neurosurgical patients. The rank correlation between the GCS sum score and the RLS85 was -0.94, suggesting the same ranking order of severity and indicating that the underlying concepts of somnolence, delirium, and motor responses in coma are evaluated in the same way. By the sign test, the RLS85 was shown to have better interobserver agreement than the GCS sum score and the eye-motor-verbal (EMV) profile. The interobserver grading disagreements in both scales were distributed over the entire range of responsiveness, and for the GCS sum score they were slanted to combined segments 9 to 15. The RLS85 showed full coverage of relevant factors, while 43 (60%) of the 72 test occasions in the GCS sum score and the EMV profiles showed untestable features, most often because of patient intubation. The pseudoscore (that is, the choice of value given to untestable features) affects interobserver agreement as well as the estimated overall patient responsiveness in the GCS sum score. Assessment by the order of applying the scales showed a significant effect on the GCS eye-opening scale (p = 0.01) and the GCS sum score (p = 0.03), indicating a sensitivity to environmental stimuli unrelated to the patient's status. This study demonstrates that basically the same information as that found in the separate eye, motor, and verbal scales of the GCS can be combined directly into the RLS85, which has better interobserver agreement and better coverage than the GCS sum score.     

Serum neuron-specific enolase as a predictor of short-term outcome and its correlation with Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury

Elevated serum neuron-specific enolase levels are correlated with brain cell damage. Low scores according to Glasgow Coma Scale are also considered as serious poor prognostic factor. The aims of the study were to investigate whether there is a correlation between the two measurements in patients with traumatic brain injury and whether serum neuron-specific enolase levels have potential as a screening test to predict outcome. A total of 169 consecutive patients with traumatic brain injury admitted to our clinic between 2002 and 2005 are included in this study. Those patients, who had any major health problem before trauma, were excluded from the study. However, patients with isolated head injury were included in the study. Serial serum neuron-specific enolase concentrations taken at the first 2, 24, and 48 h after traumatic brain injury were analyzed. A computed tomography was performed on each patient on admission. Their Glasgow Coma Scale scores were recorded serially. The relationship between Glasgow Coma Scale scores and the serum neuron-specific enolase levels were assessed by statistical methods. There was a significant negative correlation between the serum neuron-specific enolase levels and Glasgow Coma Scale scores. The levels of neuron-specific enolase were significantly higher in the patients who died in 30 days after trauma and whose scores were lower than or equal to 8 points in Glasgow Coma Scale. Although there are several serious limitations of the use of neuron-specific enolase as a biomarker in traumatic brain injury (i.e., hypoperfusion, extracranial trauma, bleeding, liver, or kidney damage also increase the level of neuron-specific enolase), its concentrations may be useful as a practical and helpful screening test to identify neurotrauma patients who are at increased risk and may provide supplementary estimation with radiological and clinical findings.