Usefulness of adiponectin as a predictor of all cause mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Substantial evidence points to a protective role of adiponectin against atherosclerosis and cardiovascular (CV) disease. However, in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the role of adiponectin has not previously been studied. Consequently, the aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of adiponectin after AMI in a large population of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 735 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction admitted to a single high-volume invasive heart center and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention from September 2006 to December 2008 were included. Blood samples were drawn immediately before the invasive procedure. Plasma adiponectin was measured using a validated immunoassay. End points were all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and admission for new AMI or heart failure. The median follow-up time was 27 months (interquartile range 22 to 33). Patients with high adiponectin (quartile 4) had increased mortality compared to patients with low adiponectin (quartiles 1 to 3) (log-rank p <0.001). After adjustment for conventional risk factors (age, gender, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, body mass index, C-reactive protein, peak troponin I, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, previous AMI, multivessel disease, complex lesions, left anterior descending coronary artery lesion, and symptom-to-balloon time) by Cox regression analysis, high adiponectin remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 3.2, p = 0.001) and CV mortality (hazard ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 4.5, p = 0.001). In conclusion, increased plasma adiponectin independently predicts all-cause and CV mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Impact of chronic total occlusion artery on 12-month mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (From the PL-ACS Registry)

Background

Three-vessel coronary artery disease is associated with high mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on 12‐month mortality of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the non-infarct-related artery (non-IRA), as assessed by coronary angiography during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for NSTEMI, of patients with 3-vessel disease.

Methods

The study included all of the NSTEMI patients with 3-vessel disease by coronary angiogram who were treated by PCI and who were registered in the prospective Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS) from July 2007 to November 2009. The patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and those with significant stenosis of the left main coronary artery were excluded. The 12-month mortality was obtained from a government database.

Results

Of the 925 patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 438 (47.4%) patients had 1 or more CTO of a major non-IRA coronary artery (+ CTO), and 487 (52.6%) patients had 3-vessel disease without CTO (− CTO). The in-hospital mortality for the + CTO and − CTO patients was 5.3% and 2.1%, respectively (p = 0.009), whilst the 12-month mortality was 21.1% and 11.9%, respectively (p = 0.0001). After multivariate adjustment for differences in the baseline characteristics, the presence of CTO remained significantly associated with higher 12-month mortality (relative risk = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.01–2.00, p = 0.047).

Conclusions

The presence of CTO in non-IRA in patients with NSTEMI and 3‐vessel coronary disease predicts higher 12-month mortality.     

Comparison of myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction with versus without diabetes mellitus (from the EMERALD Trial)

Diabetes mellitus is strongly associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. It is unknown whether myocardial perfusion is decreased in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which may contribute to their worse prognosis. We compared myocardial perfusion and infarct sizes between diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing PCI for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the EMERALD trial. EMERALD was a prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating distal embolic protection during primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. End points included final myocardial blush grade, complete ST-segment resolution (STR) 30 minutes after PCI, and final infarct size as determined by technetium-99m single proton emission computed tomography measured between days 5 and 14. Of 501 patients, 62 (12%) had diabetes mellitus. Diabetic patients had impaired myocardial perfusion after PCI as measured by myocardial blush grade 0/1 (34% vs 16%, p = 0.002) and lower rates of complete 30-minute STR (45% vs 65%, p = 0.005). Infarct size (median 20% vs 11%, p = 0.005), development of new onset severe congestive heart failure (12% vs 4%, p = 0.016), and 30-day mortality (10% vs 1%, p <0.0001) were also greater in diabetic patients. After multivariate adjustment, diabetes remained associated with lack of complete STR and mortality at 6 months. Use of distal protection devices did not improve outcomes in diabetic or nondiabetic patients. In conclusion, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI, diabetes is independently associated with decreased myocardial reperfusion, larger infarct, development of congestive heart failure, and decreased survival.     

Prognostic value of uric acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes

The association between uric acid and cardiovascular disease is incompletely understood. In particular, the prognostic value of uric acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention has not been studied. This study included 5,124 patients with acute coronary syndromes who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: 1,629 with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 1,332 with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 2,163 with unstable angina. The primary end point was 1-year mortality. Patients were divided into quartiles according to uric acid level as follows: quartile 1, 1.3 to <5.3 mg/dl; quartile 2, 5.3 to <6.3 mg/dl; quartile 3, 6.3 to <7.5 mg/dl; and quartile 4, 7.5 to 18.4 mg/dl. There were 450 deaths during follow-up: 80 deaths in quartile 1, 77deaths in quartile 2, 72 deaths in quartile 3, and 221 deaths in quartile 4 of uric acid (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year mortality 6.4%, 6.2%, 5.6%, and 17.4%, respectively; unadjusted hazard ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 2.54 to 3.67, p <0.001 for fourth vs first quartile of uric acid). After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, renal function, and inflammatory status, the association between uric acid and mortality remained significant, with a 12% increase in the adjusted risk for 1-year mortality for every 1 mg/dl increase in the uric acid level. Uric acid improved the discriminatory power of the predictive model regarding 1-year mortality (absolute integrated discrimination improvement 0.008, p = 0.005). In conclusion, elevated levels of uric acid are an independent predictor of 1-year mortality across the whole spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.     

In unstable angina or non-ST-segment acute coronary syndrome, should patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergo multivessel or culprit-only stenting?

OBJECTIVES: We examined the safety and efficacy of nonculprit multivessel compared with culprit-only stenting in patients with multivessel disease presenting with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes [NSTE-ACS]). BACKGROUND: In patients presenting with NSTE-ACS, multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with adverse outcome. METHODS: Patients with multivessel CAD and NSTE-ACS that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were included. The culprit lesion was defined by reviewing each patient's angiographic report, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and, if available, nuclear stress test. All patients had at least 2 vessels with > or =50% stenosis, and the angiographic severity of CAD was assessed using the Duke Prognostic Angiographic Score. Patients with coronary bypass grafts, chronic total occlusions, and those with uncertain culprit lesions were excluded. Our end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or any target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: From January 1995 to June 2005, 1,240 patients with ACS and multivessel CAD underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal stenting and met our study criteria. Of these, 479 underwent multivessel and 761 underwent culprit-only stenting. There were 442 events during a median follow-up of 2.3 years. Multivessel intervention was associated with lower death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization after both adjusting for baseline and angiographic characteristics (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and propensity matched analysis (hazard ratio 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.88; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multivessel CAD presenting with NSTE-ACS, multivessel intervention was significantly associated with a lower revascularization rate, which translated to a lower incidence of the composite end point compared with culprit-only stenting.     

Comparison of angiographic and other findings and mortality in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing early invasive intervention

We sought to compare the angiographic findings and mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing early invasive intervention. Of 11,872 patients enrolled in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry from November 2005 to January 2008, we studied patients with NSTEMI undergoing early invasive intervention (n = 1,486) and those with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 4,392). Multivessel coronary disease, baseline Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3, and the left circumflex artery as a culprit lesion occurred more frequently in patients with NSTEMI than in those with STEMI. Those with NSTEMI had a significantly lower mortality rate than those with STEMI during a median follow-up of about 12 months (3.8% vs 6.7%, p <0.001). In the patients with NSTEMI, the independent predictors of mortality included postprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 to 2 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 9.29, p = 0.047) and multivessel coronary disease (HR 3.83, 95% CI 1.36 to 10.81, p = 0.010) but not baseline TIMI flow or infarct location. However, baseline TIMI flow grade 0 to 2 (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.36, p = 0.035), anterior infarction (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.23, p <0.001), multivessel coronary disease (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.91, p = 0.008), and postprocedural TIMI flow grade 0 to 2 (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.82, p <0.001) were all independent predictors of mortality in the patients with STEMI. In conclusion, the angiographic findings in patients from NSTEMI differ from those in patients with STEMI. Postprocedural TIMI flow and multivessel coronary disease were independent predictors of mortality in patients with NSTEMI undergoing early invasive intervention.     

Late (3 years) follow-up of successful versus unsuccessful revascularization in chronic total coronary occlusions treated by drug eluting stent

The success rate of recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) has improved in recent years, but the clinical benefit associated with successful CTO recanalization in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era is not well known. A cohort of 317 consecutive patients (mean age 65 ± 10, 84% men) with CTOs (defined as Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 0 and duration >3 months) of native coronary vessels in which percutaneous coronary intervention was attempted was enrolled from June 2005 to March 2009. All successful procedures (196 patients) were performed by DES implantation. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization) was assessed during a mean follow-up period of 3 years. MACE predictors were assessed in clinical, angiographic, and procedural data, including procedural success. Patients with successful percutaneous coronary intervention experienced a significantly lower MACE rate compared to those with failed procedures (17 [9%] vs 32 [26%], p = 0.008). Patients with multivessel disease experienced MACEs more frequently than those with single-vessel disease (45 [22%] vs 4 [4%], p = 0.002). On multiple Cox regression analysis, the presence of multivessel disease and CTO opening failure were independent predictors of MACEs (hazard ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 4.96, p = 0.01, and hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.33 to 4.12, p = 0.02, respectively). The worst prognosis was confined to patients with multivessel disease and failed procedures (hazard ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 3.92, p = 0.03). In conclusion, successful recanalization of CTOs with DES translates into a reduction of the 3-year MACE rate compared to failed procedures, and the worst prognosis is observed in patients with failed procedures and multivessel disease, a notion that might be taken into account in the management of patients with coronary CTOs.     

Prognostic value of uric acid in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention

Elevated uric acid (UA) levels have been associated with cardiovascular disease in epidemiologic studies. The relation between UA levels and long-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not known. Data from 2,249 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups with high or low UA using upper limits of normal of 6 mg/dl for women and 7 mg/dl for men. There were 1,643 patients in the low-UA group (mean age 55.9 ± 11.6 years, 85% men) and 606 patients in the high-UA group (mean age 60.5 ± 12.6 years, 76% men). Serum UA levels were 8.0 ± 1.5 mg/dl in the high-UA group and 5.2 ± 1.0 mg/dl in the low-UA group (p <0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with high UA levels (9% vs 2%, p <0.001), as was the rate of adverse outcomes in patients with high UA. The mean follow-up time was 24.3 months. Cardiovascular mortality, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, heart failure, and major adverse cardiac events were all significantly higher in the high-UA group. In a multivariate analyses, high plasma UA levels were an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events in the hospital (odds ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 3.75, p = 0.006) and during long-term follow-up (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.56, p = 0.03). In conclusion, high UA levels on admission are independently associated with in-hospital and long-term adverse outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention.     

The Natural History of Nonculprit Lesions in STEMI: An FFR Substudy of the Compare-Acute Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in non-infarct-related arteries (IRAs) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI).BackgroundPatients with ST-segment elevation MI often present with multivessel disease. The treatment of non-IRAs is debated. The applicability of FFR has not been widely proved.MethodsOutcomes were analyzed in all patients in the Compare-Acute (Comparison Between FFR Guided Revascularization Versus Conventional Strategy in Acute STEMI Patients With MVD) trial in whom, after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention, non-IRAs were interrogated using FFR and treated medically. The treating cardiologist was blinded to the FFR value. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular mortality, target vessel–related (non-IRA with FFR measurement at primary percutaneous coronary intervention) nonfatal MI, and target vessel revascularization: major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 24 months.ResultsA total of 751 patients (963 vessels) were included. Target non-IRAs with MACE had lower FFR compared with those without (0.78 vs. 0.84, respectively; p < 0.001). The median FFR of non-IRAs with TVR was lower than that of those without (0.79 vs. 0.85, respectively; p < 0.001). The difference was significant in all vessels. The median FFR of target non-IRAs with MI was lower than that of those without (0.79 vs. 0.84, respectively; p = 0.016). The MACE rate was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the lowest of FFR tertiles (<0.80) compared with the others (0.80 to 0.87 and ≥0.88).ConclusionsIn patients with ST-segment elevation MI with multivessel disease, FFR measured in the medically treated non-IRA immediately after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention shows a nonlinear and inverse risk continuum of MACE. Importantly, worsening prognosis is demonstrated around the cutoff of 0.80.     

Effect of coronary occlusion site on angiographic and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with early coronary intervention

In acute myocardial infarction that is treated with thrombolysis, proximal coronary artery occlusion is associated with worse prognosis, irrespective of the infarcted artery. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently the treatment of choice for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, we evaluated the prognostic significance of proximal versus distal coronary artery occlusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction that was treated with primary PCI. Between 1994 and 2001, patients with a first acute myocardial infarction that was treated with primary PCI were analyzed. A lesion was considered proximal if it was located proximal to the first diagonal branch in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), the first marginal obtuse branch in the left circumflex coronary artery, and the first right acute marginal branch in the right coronary artery. Lesions distal of these side branches were considered distal. In total, 1,468 patients were analyzed. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for proximal LAD lesions was lower than that for distal ones (37 +/- 11% vs 42 +/- 11%, p <0.0001). Adjusted relative risk of 3-year mortality for proximal versus distal LAD was 4.04 (95% confidence interval 1.95 to 8.38). In patients with infarcts related to the right or left circumflex coronary artery, no significant association between lesion location and LVEF or mortality was seen. No difference was seen in adjusted 3-year mortality between distal LAD and non-LAD-related infarcts (p = 0.145). In conclusion, our analysis shows that, even in patients with acute myocardial infarction that is treated with primary PCI, infarcts related to the proximal LAD have the worst 3-year survival and lowest residual LVEF compared with distal LAD or non-LAD-related infarcts.     

Immediate versus staged complete myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: A post hoc analysis of the randomized FLOWER-MI trial

BackgroundIn patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, percutaneous coronary intervention for non-culprit lesions is superior to treatment of the culprit lesion alone. The optimal timing for non-infarct-related artery revascularization – immediate versus staged – has not been investigated adequately.AimWe aimed to assess clinical outcomes at 1 year in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease using immediate versus staged non-infarct-related artery revascularization.MethodsOutcomes were analysed in patients from the randomized FLOWER-MI trial, in whom, after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention, non-culprit lesions were assessed using fractional flow reserve or angiography during the index procedure or during a staged procedure during the initial hospital stay, ≤ 5 days after the index procedure. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and unplanned hospitalization with urgent revascularization at 1 year.ResultsAmong 1171 patients enrolled in this study, 1119 (96.2%) had complete revascularization performed during a staged procedure, and 44 (3.8%) at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. During follow-up, a primary outcome event occurred in one of the patients (2.3%) with an immediate strategy and in 55 patients (4.9%) with a staged strategy (adjusted hazard ratio 1.44, 95% confidence interval 0.39–12.69; P = 0.64).ConclusionsStaged non-infarct-related artery complete revascularization was the strategy preferred by investigators in practice in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease. This strategy was not superior to immediate revascularization, which, in the context of this trial, was used in a small proportion of patients. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these observational findings.     

Comparison of one-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes (from the CUSTOMIZE Registry)

Uncertainty surrounds the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery disease presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), and adequately sized specific comparisons of percutaneous and surgical revascularization in this scenario are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with left main coronary artery disease and ACS treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug-eluting stent implantation or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 583 patients were included. At 1 year, MACEs were significantly higher in patients treated with PCI (n = 222) compared to those treated with CABG (n = 361, 14.4% vs 5.3%, p <0.001), driven by a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (8.1% vs 1.7%, p = 0.001). This finding was consistent after statistical adjustment for MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 5.9, p = 0.01) and target lesion revascularization (adjusted HR 8.0, 95% CI 2.2 to 28.7, p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences between PCI and CABG were noted for death (adjusted HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.4 to 3.0, p = 0.81) and myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 4.8, 95% CI 0.3 to 68.6, p = 0.25). No interaction between clinical presentation (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) and treatment (PCI or CABG) was observed (p for interaction = 0.68). In conclusion, in patients with left main coronary artery disease and ACS, PCI is associated with similar safety compared to CABG but higher risk of MACEs driven by increased risk of repeat revascularization.     

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide is a biomarker of congestive heart failure and predictive of 30-day untoward clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Increased levels of N-terminal pro-brain natiuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are now recognized as a new and useful biochemical marker that is predictive of clinical outcomes in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). However, an association between an increased circulating level of this biomarker and clinical outcomes in patients following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been fully delineated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to test whether NT-proBNP can predict prognosis in patients following ST-segment elevated AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective cohort study of 242 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevated AMI of onset <12 h who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was conducted. Blood samples for plasma concentration of NT-proBNP were collected following vascular puncture. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the 30-day composite major adverse clinical outcomes (MACO) [advanced Killip score > or =3, functional class > or =3 of CHF and 30-day mortality] were strongly associated with elevated NT-proBNP (>243 pg/ml) (p<0.0001), unsuccessful reperfusion (final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow < or =2) (p<0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <45% (p<0.0001), diabetes mellitus (DM) (p=0.0004) and multivessel disease (p=0.0005). Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated that elevation of NT-proBNP (p=0.0002), LVEF < 45% (p=0.0003), DM (p=0.0007), unsuccessful reperfusion (p=0.006), and age (> or =70 years) (p=0.031) are independent predictors of 30-day MACO. Additionally, elevation of NT-proBNP, together with advanced Killip score and unsuccessful reperfusion, are significant independent predictors of increased 30-day mortality (all p values <0.005). CONCLUSION: Increased NT-proBNP level was the most independent predictor of 30-day MACO in patients with ST-segment elevated AMI undergoing primary PCI.     

Relation between electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution and early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

ST-segment resolution (STR) is a surrogate end point in reperfusion trials of acute myocardial infarction, but there are few data regarding the optimum methods of measurement, clinical predictors, and correlation with late cardiac mortality. Consecutive patients (n = 1,005) who had acute myocardial infarction and >/=2 mm ST-segment elevation controlled with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) constituted our study group. Follow-up was obtained in 97% of patients at a median of 6.2 years. STR measured as maximum ST-segment elevation after PCI provided better discrimination of late cardiac mortality than did STR measured as percent resolution. Complete STR (<1.0 mm ST-segment elevation after PCI) was achieved in only 42% of patients. Anterior infarction, Killip's class 3 to 4, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grades <2 before PCI and <3 after PCI were strong independent predictors of partial or poor STR. STR (complete [<1.0 mm] vs partial [1.0 to 2.0 mm] vs poor [>2.0 mm]) correlated with in-hospital mortality (4.0% vs 6.7% vs 11.6%, p = 0.005), reinfarction (1.4% vs 3.4% vs 6.1%, p = 0.01), and late cardiac mortality (17% vs 25% vs 44%, p <0.0001). Correlation with late mortality was stronger for nonanterior than for anterior infarction. Poor STR was a strong independent predictor of late mortality (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.50, p = 0.028), even after adjusting for Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow. These data support the use of STR as a simple method to stratify patients by risk after primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction and support the use of STR as a surrogate end point in reperfusion trials of acute myocardial infarction.     

In-hospital and long-term outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction

Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is discouraged because of the potential for increased complications. However, with recent advances in PCI, the safety and long-term outcomes of multivessel PCI are unknown. We evaluated the outcomes of multivessel PCI early after AMI (ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation AMI). We identified all patients who had multivessel disease and underwent PCI within 7 days after an AMI from 1997 to 2002. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent multivessel PCI (n = 239) and patients who underwent treatment of the infarct-related artery alone (n = 1,145). The primary end point was cumulative survival at 6, 12, and 36 months. Secondary end points included a composite of mortality, recurrent infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, or target vessel revascularization at the same time points. There were 138 deaths and 351 occurrences of the composite end point during follow-up. The multivessel PCI group had a significantly higher prevalence of adverse prognostic indicators. Despite this, observed event rates were similar between the multivessel PCI and 1-vessel PCI groups. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year survival was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87 to 0.95) for the multivessel PCI group and 0.93 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.95) for the 1-vessel PCI group (p = 0.43). Similarly, 1-year survival free of recurrent infarction and target vessel revascularization rates were similar between the 2 groups: multivessel PCI 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.84) and 1-vessel PCI 0.78 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.81). Multivessel PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease after AMI compared with 1-vessel PCI was not associated with an excess risk of death or of combined death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, or target vessel revascularization.     

急性心肌梗死后非梗死相关动脉狭窄的介入治疗策略

急性心肌梗死多支病变患者急诊冠脉介入手术开通梗死相关动脉后,残余的非梗死相关动脉狭窄的介入治疗问题一直存在争议。现就如何评价非梗死相关动脉狭窄及如何选择最能从分期冠脉介入术中获益的患者等问题进行综述。     

Benefit of revascularization in non-infarct-related artery in multivessel disease patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

This study compared the prognosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD) with that of single vessel disease (SVD) and investigated the revascularization benefit of noninfarct-related artery (IRA) in MVD patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Between 2002 and 2009, 1278 patients with STEMI underwent primary PCI. Of these patients, 717 (56.1%) with SVD (only IRA obstruction) were placed in group A, while 561 (43.9%) with MVD (Group B) were further categorized into group 1 (PCI for IRA) and group 2 (staged PCI for IRA+non-IRA). The results demonstrated a lower degree of successful reperfusion in IRA and higher 30-day and 1-year cumulative mortality rates in group B (P < 0.001). While there was no difference in successful reperfusion in IRA between group 1 and group 2, the 30-day and one-year cumulative mortality rates were higher in group 1. Multivariate analysis identified MVD as an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (P < 0.001). In conclusion, patients with subsequent PCI for MVD had better 30-day and 1-year outcomes than those with conservative treatment.     

Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction and simple nonculprit arteries

BACKGROUND: Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is currently controversial. In this study, we investigated the significance of multivessel PCI in Chinese patients with ST-segment elevation AMI and relatively simple lesions in nonculprit arteries. METHODS: We reviewed all consecutive primary PCI of ST-segment elevation AMI in our hospital between 2002 and 2005. The patients with multivessel disease and ACC/AHA type A/B1 lesions in nonculprit arteries who underwent multivessel PCI were identified (n = 105, multivessel PCI group), and 120 patients with single-vessel disease and treatment with primary PCI were enrolled as control subjects (single-vessel PCI group). The primary end points were the occurrences of 6-month major adverse cardiac events (cardiogenic death, nonfatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization). The secondary end points included procedure time, angiographic success rate, TIMI grade, reperfusion arrhythmia, ST-segment resolution, and left ventricular ejection fraction. RESULTS: All patients with multivessel PCI tolerated the operations well and had similar TIMI 3 and angiographic success rates but longer procedure times than those patients with single-vessel PCI. There were no significant differences in reperfusion arrhythmia, ST-segment resolution, left ventricular ejection fraction, or 6-month MACEs between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that multivessel PCI is effective and safe for Chinese patients with ST-segment elevation AMI and simple lesions in nonculprit arteries.     

Major adverse upper gastrointestinal events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention and dual antiplatelet therapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of composite short-term and long-term major adverse upper gastrointestinal (UGI) events (MAUGIEs; defined as gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastroduodenal ulcer, or UGI bleeding) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and routinely received dual-antiplatelet therapy. From May 2002 to September 2010, a total of 1,368 consecutive patients who experienced ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled in the study. The incidence of in-hospital UGI bleeding complications and composite MAUGIEs was 8.9% and 9.9%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with in-hospital MAUGIEs than in those without (p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age, advanced Killip score (≥3), and respiratory failure were the strongest independent predictors of in-hospital composite MAUGIEs (all p <0.003). The cumulative composite of MAUGIEs after uneventful discharge in patients without adverse UGI events who continuously received dual-antiplatelet therapy for 3 to 12 months, followed by aspirin therapy, was 10.4% during long-term (mean 4.0 years) follow-up. In conclusion, the results of this study show a remarkably high incidence of composite short-term and long-term MAUGIEs in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and received routine dual-antiplatelet therapy. Age, advanced Killip score, and respiratory failure were significantly and independently predictive of in-hospital composite MAUGIEs.     

Prognostic impact of chronic total occlusion in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous intervention

Background The presence of a chronic total occlusion(CTO)in a non-infarct-related artery might be associatedwith a worse prognosis in long term benefit for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEIMI)patients. But it still remain controversial. Methods All 383 STEMI patients underwent percutaneous intervention(PCI)from Jan 2015 to Jan 2017 in our center were enrolled in this prospective study. Baseline characteristics,medical history,biochemical findings,echocardiographic and angiographic parameters,procedures performed and complications were recorded. Factors related to worse outcome CTO in STEMI patients were analyzed by the cox logistic regression analysis for the hazard rate(HR). Results In a total of 383 patients enrolled in this study,85 cases had CTO in at least 1 coronary artery. The mean follow-up was 352 days. 1-year mortality and MACE ratesinpatients with CTO were 18.8% and 11.8%,respectively. Major adverse cardiac events(MACE)during follow-up were significantly higher in patients with CTO(HR=2.88;95%CI,1.82-4.77;P0.001). The multivariate analysis showed a significant association between CTO and MACE(HR=2.11 95%CI,1.27-3.88;P=0.014). Conclusion Chronic total occlusion is associated with higher risk of comorbidities and higher mortality,and serves as an independent predictor of MACE.