A Case-Control Study of Male Colorectal Cancer in Aichi Prefecture, Japan: with Special Reference to Occupational Activity Level, Drinking Habits and Family History

The relationships of occupational activity level, drinking habits and family history of cancer to the risk of male colorectal cancer by subsites were investigated in a case-control study involving 1,716 cases with colon cancer, 1,611 cases with rectal cancer and 16,600 controls with other sites of cancer identified from the Aichi Cancer Registry, Japan 1979–1987. An occupation with a low activity level was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer; the age-adjusted relative risk (RR) compared to the high activity level group was 1.92 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–2.67) for proximal colon cancer, 1.52 (95% CI: 1.19–1.94) for distal colon cancer and 1.38 (95% CI: 1.17–1.62) for rectal cancer. Beer drinkers showed an increased risk of colorectal cancer; the age-adjusted RR was 1.49 (95% CI: 1.13–1.95) for proximal colon cancer, 1.65 (95% CI: 1.34-2.04) for distal colon cancer and 1.88 (95% CI: 1.62–2.18) for rectal cancer. The RR for family history of colorectal cancer was 3.40 (95% CI: 2.19–5.29) for proximal colon cancer, 2.54 (95% CI: 1.73–3.75) for distal colon cancer and 1.78 (95% CI: 1.28–2.49) for rectal cancer. Multivariate analysis controlled for age, residence, marital status and smoking in addition to occupational activity level, beer drinking and family history of colorectal cancer did not materially change the RRs. When these three variables were combined, the RR was 15.72 (95% CI: 5.40–45.78) for proximal colon cancer, 10.55 (95% CI: 4.24–26.27) for distal colon cancer and 6.69 (95% CI: 3.12–14.36) for rectal cancer.     

A case-control study of male colorectal cancer in Aichi Prefecture, Japan: with special reference to occupational activity level, drinking habits and family history

The relationships of occupational activity level, drinking habits and family history of cancer to the risk of male colorectal cancer by subsites were investigated in a case-control study involving 1,716 cases with colon cancer, 1,611 cases with rectal cancer and 16,600 controls with other sites of cancer identified from the Aichi Cancer Registry, Japan 1979-1987. An occupation with a low activity level was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer; the age-adjusted relative risk (RR) compared to the high activity level group was 1.92 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-2.67) for proximal colon cancer, 1.52 (95% CI: 1.19-1.94) for distal colon cancer and 1.38 (95% CI: 1.17-1.62) for rectal cancer. Beer drinkers showed an increased risk of colorectal cancer; the age-adjusted RR was 1.49 (95% CI: 1.13-1.95) for proximal colon cancer, 1.65 (95% CI: 1.34-2.04) for distal colon cancer and 1.88 (95% CI: 1.62-2.18) for rectal cancer. The RR for family history of colorectal cancer was 3.40 (95% CI: 2.19-5.29) for proximal colon cancer, 2.54 (95% CI: 1.73-3.75) for distal colon cancer and 1.78 (95% CI: 1.28-2.49) for rectal cancer. Multivariate analysis controlled for age, residence, marital status and smoking in addition to occupational activity level, beer drinking and family history of colorectal cancer did not materially change the RRs. When these three variables were combined, the RR was 15.72 (95% CI: 5.40-45.78) for proximal colon cancer, 10.55 (95% CI: 4.24-26.27) for distal colon cancer and 6.69 (95% CI: 3.12-14.36) for rectal cancer.     

A Comparative Case-Control Study of Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma

We conducted a comparative case-control study of colorectal cancer and adenoma involving 221 cases with colorectal cancer, 525 cases with colorectal adenoma and 578 neighborhood controls. Daily vegetables intake was associated with lower risks of distal colon adenoma (relative risk (RR)=0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39–0.89) and rectal cancer (RR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.25–0.84). Daily beans intake was associated with lower risk of colon adenoma (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.37–0.91 for the proximal colon and RR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.45–0.88 for the distal colon) and daily intake of seaweeds was associated with lower risk of rectal cancer (RR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.22–0.82). Daily intake of fish and shellfish also showed an inverse association with the risk of colon adenoma (RR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.45–0.99 for the proximal colon and RR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.52–0.94 for the distal colon). Generally, intakes of animal or vegetable fat-rich foods, especially meats, were associated with decreases in risks of both adenoma and cancer, though the association of cancer was not statistically significant. Other than dietary factors, daily alcohol drinking was associated with an increased risk of adenoma in the proximal colon (RR=1.95, 95% CI: 1.15–3.29) and ex-drinkers showed higher risks for colon adenoma and colorectal cancer. Sports or occupational activities and coffee drinking were inversely associated and family history of colorectal cancer was positively associated with the risks of both colorectal adenoma and cancer.     

Family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps as a risk factor for colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of common colorectal cancer among first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps. In a population screening programme, 59406 subjects underwent an immunochemical faecal occult blood test. In a medical check-up-based cross-sectional study, 6139 subjects had a colonoscopic examination. They were divided into two groups, according to the results of a questionnaire on family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, and the detection rates for colorectal cancer were compared in the groups positive or negative for a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps. In the screening programme-based cross-sectional study, the detection rate for colorectal cancer was 0.57% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.76) and 0.15% (95% CI: 0.12-0.18) in subjects with and without a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, respectively, showing a significant difference in the detection rate for colorectal cancer between the two groups (P<0.05). In the medical check-up-based cross-sectional study, the detection rate for colorectal cancer was 2.31% (95% CI: 1.15-3.47) and 0.53% (95% CI: 0. 34-0.72) in subjects with and without a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, respectively, indicating a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). These findings indicate that first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps have an elevated risk for common colorectal cancer, and that people with a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps should be considered as a priority group for colorectal cancer screening.     

Tobacco smoking and colorectal hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps.

Colorectal adenomas and possibly some hyperplastic polyps are precursors of colorectal cancer. Tobacco use is associated in epidemiologic studies with these polyps, although links between smoking and colorectal cancer are less consistent. To characterize the role of tobacco in early colorectal carcinogenesis, we compared tobacco use among 4,383 subjects with histologically verified benign (hyperplastic or adenomatous) polyps of the distal colon (descending colon, sigmoid, and rectum) with tobacco use among 33,667 subjects who were endoscopy negative for distal colon tumors, in the screening arm of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Trial, a randomized trial of flexible sigmoidoscopy. Risks, estimated by the odds ratio (OR), associated with current cigarette use were OR = 4.4 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 3.7-5.2] for hyperplastic polyps only, OR = 1.8 (95% CI, 1.5-2.1) for adenomas only, and OR = 6.2 (95% CI, 4.7-8.3) for subjects with both hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps concurrently. Effects were weaker among ex smokers; the smoking-associated ORs remained consistently higher for hyperplastic polyps. This pattern was also seen in relation to cigarettes smoked per day, smoking duration, and pack-years. Tobacco-associated risks for multiple polyps were also stronger when hyperplastic disease was involved. In conclusion, tobacco use, particularly recent use, increases risk for both adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps, but the risks are substantially greater for hyperplastic lesions.     

A comparative case-control study of colorectal cancer and adenoma

We conducted a comparative case-control study of colorectal cancer and adenoma involving 221 cases with colorectal cancer, 525 cases with colorectal adenoma and 578 neighborhood controls. Daily vegetables intake was associated with lower risks of distal colon adenoma (relative risks (RR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-0.89) and rectal cancer (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.84). Daily beans intake was associated with lower risk of colon adenoma (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37-0.91 for the proximal colon and RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.88 for the distal colon) and daily intake of seaweeds was associated with lower risk of rectal cancer (RR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.22-0.82). Daily intake of fish and shellfish also showed an inverse association with the risk of colon adenoma (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45-0.99 for the proximal colon and RR = 0.70, 0.52-0.94 for the distal colon). Generally, intakes of animal or vegetable fat-rich foods, especially meats, were associated with decreases in risks of both adenoma and cancer, though the association of cancer was not statistically significant. Other than dietary factors, daily alcohol drinking was associated with an increased risk of adenoma in the proximal colon (RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.15-3.29) and ex-drinkers showed higher risks for colon adenoma and colorectal cancer. Sports or occupational activities and coffee drinking were inversely associated and family history of colorectal cancer was positively associated with the risk of both colorectal adenoma and cancer.     

Family history and colorectal cancer: predictors of risk

INTRODUCTION: While the association between family history of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives and risk of developing colon cancer has been well defined, the association with rectal cancer is much less clear. The purpose of this study is to define rectal cancer risk associated with family history of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives. We also evaluate diet and lifestyle factors associated with developing colorectal cancer among participants with a positive family history. METHODS: Data were available from two population-based case--control studies of colon and rectal cancer. Participants were members of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program (KPMCP) or residents of the state of Utah. Cases were first primary colon cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 1994 (n = 1308 cases and 1544 controls) or rectal cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 2001 (n = 952 cases and 1205 controls). RESULTS: A family history of colorectal cancer in any first-degree relatives slightly increased risk of rectal cancer (OR: 1.37 95% CI: 1.02-1.85). Family history of colorectal cancer was associated with the greatest risk among those diagnosed at age 50 or younger (OR: 2.09 95% CI: 0.94-4.65 for rectal tumors; OR: 3.00 95% CI: 0.98-9.20 for distal colon tumors; and OR: 7.88 95% CI: 2.62-23.7 for proximal colon tumors). Factors significantly associated with cancer risk among those with a family history of colorectal cancer, included not having a sigmoidoscopy (OR: 2.81 95% CI: 1.86-4.24): a diet not Prudent, i.e. high in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish and poultry, (OR: 2.79 95% CI: 1.40-5.56); smoking cigarettes (OR: 1.68 95% CI: 1.12-2.53), and eating a Western diet, i.e. a diet high in meat, refined grains, high-fat foods, and fast foods, (OR: 2.15 95% CI: 1.06-4.35). Physical inactivity was not associated with increased cancer risk among those with a positive family history of colorectal cancer. SUMMARY: These results confirm observations reported by others that a family history of colorectal cancer increases risk of cancer among those diagnosed at a younger age. Associations with family history are weakest for rectal cancer and strongest for proximal colonic tumors. Since several diet and lifestyle factors influence development of cancer among those with a family history of the disease, there appears to be practical approaches for individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer to reduce their cancer risk.     

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and subsite-specific colorectal cancer incidence in the Iowa women's health study.

BACKGROUND: Previous epidemiologic studies have shown that regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with decreased colorectal cancer risk. However, few studies have examined associations between NSAID use and subsite-specific colorectal cancer risks. Because tumors of the proximal and distal colon differ with respect to their genetic alterations, clinicopathologic features, and demographic distribution, further investigation of subsite-specific colorectal cancer risks may be rewarding. METHODS: Data about aspirin and non-aspirin-NSAID use were recorded by self-report in 1992 among the initially cancer-free cohort of postmenopausal women in the Iowa Women's Health Study (n = 27,160). In total, 637 women developed colorectal cancer during the 11 years of follow-up, including 365 proximal colon, 132 distal colon, and 120 rectal cancer cases (11 overlapping and 9 not specified). RESULTS: For colon cancer, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for women reporting use of aspirin two to five times and six or more times weekly (compared with nonusers of aspirin) were 0.79 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.59-1.04] and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.58-1.00), respectively. The corresponding HRs for non-aspirin NSAIDs were 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41-0.96) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.63-1.15), respectively. For proximal colon cancer, the multivariable-adjusted HRs for women reporting use of aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs two or more times weekly (compared with nonusers of each) were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51-0.87) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.52-0.97), respectively. No statistically significant association was found between either distal colon or rectal cancer and aspirin or non-aspirin NSAID use. DISCUSSION: Our study is consistent with a limited number of prior reports that have observed stronger associations between NSAID use and proximal versus distal colorectal cancer.     

Parity and other reproductive factors and risk of adenomatous polyps of the distal colorectum (United States)

Evidence for an effect of reproductive factors on colorectal carcinogenesis is inconsistent and little is known about their role in development of precursor adenomatous polyps. We evaluated the relation between reproductive factors and distal colorectal adenomas (n = 982) during14 years of follow up of 26,983 participants in the Nurses' Health Study(United States). The women were free of diagnosed cancer or polyps in 1980,underwent endoscopy 1980-94, and had reported on their parity, oral contraceptive (OC) use, and ages at menarche, first term-pregnancy, and menopause. We calculated relative risks (RR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) using multiple logistic regression. Women with higher parity had an increased risk of adenomas of the distal colorectum (P trend = 0.004;6+ cf 0 parity: RR = 1.3, CI = 0.9-1.8) or distal colon (P trend = 0.002, RR= 1.7, CI = 1.2-2.6). This association was significantly stronger among women with a family history of colorectal cancer ( P interaction = 0.03); comparing6+ term-pregnancies with nulliparity, among those with a family history, the RR for distal colon adenoma was 3.2 (CI = 1.4-7.2), while among those without a family history, the RR was 1.3 (CI = 0.8-2.2). We observed no association for distal colorectal adenoma and age at menarche, age at first term-pregnancy, ever use of OCs, or menopausal status. Further work is needed to clarify the relation of parity with colon adenoma risk. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Family history and environmental risk factors for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the joint effect of environmental risk factors and family history of colorectal cancer on colon cancer. METHODS: We used data from a case-control study conducted in northern Italy between 1992 and 1996 including 1225 cases with colon cancer and 4154 controls. We created a weighed risk factor score for the main environmental risk factors in this population (positive family history, high education, low occupational physical activity, high daily meal frequency, low intake of fiber, low intake of calcium, and low intake of beta-carotene). RESULTS: Compared with the reference category (subjects with no family history of colorectal cancer and in the lowest tertile of the risk factor score), the odds ratios of colon cancer were 2.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.89-2.73] for subjects without family history and in the highest environmental risk factor score, 3.20 (95% CI = 2.05-5.01) for those with family history and low risk factor score, and 7.08 (95% CI = 4.68-10.71) for those with family history and high risk factor score. The pattern of risk was similar for men and women and no meaningful differences emerged according to subsite within the colon. CONCLUSIONS: Family history of colorectal cancer interacts with environmental risk factors of colon cancer.     

Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality.

BACKGROUND: Sigmoidoscopy may reduce colorectal cancer mortality by identifying both cancers and precursor lesions (including polyps) for treatment; however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this technique as a screening procedure is extremely limited. PURPOSE: In the absence of data from randomized controlled trials, we performed a retrospective case-control study to determine if sigmoidoscopy screening is associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality. METHODS: The medical records of 66 members of the Greater Marshfield Community Health Plan (GMCHP) who died of large-bowel cancer from 1979 to 1988 were reviewed for history of screening for colorectal cancer (case subjects). For comparison, the records of 196 GMCHP members of similar gender, age, and enrollment duration were randomly selected for review (control subjects). RESULTS: History of screening sigmoidoscopy was much less common among case subjects (10%) than among control subjects (30%). Risk for death from colorectal cancer was reduced among individuals having had a single examination by screening sigmoidoscopy (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.52), compared with the risk for those who never had one. The reduction in risk appeared to be limited to tumors in the rectum and distal colon. Neither fecal occult blood testing nor digital rectal examination was associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that screening sigmoidoscopy can substantially reduce mortality from cancers of the rectum and distal colon.     

Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients

Our objective was to assess the overall risk of subsequent colorectal neoplasms (cancer or adenoma) in relation with the various characteristics of the index lesion in a cohort of patients who underwent endoscopic polypectomies of colorectal adenomas. A total of 1086 patients with adenomas of the large bowel were reported between 1979 and 1999 at the National Cancer Institute of Milan during a screening program for colorectal carcinoma. Data on patients who had colonoscopic examinations and treatments were collected prospectively. The relation between colorectal cancer (CRC) and adenoma features was assessed by computing the hazard ratio (HR) values and corresponding confidence intervals (95% CI) according to Cox proportional hazard models. Of the 1086 eligible patients (487 females, 579 males), 736 had single adenomas (67.7%) and 350 had multiple adenomas (32.3%). Histologic examination revealed 772 cases of tubular adenoma (73%), 205 cases of tubulovillous adenoma and 80 cases of villous adenoma (7.5%). Severe dysplasia was found in 3.3% of the cases. During the 11393 person-years of follow-up, with an average time of surveillance of 10.5 years, colorectal carcinomas developed in 10 patients (0.8%) and a new adenoma in 323 patients (29%). Multivariate analysis showed that male gender (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3-2.0), multiple polyps (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3-2.0), polyps larger than 2 cm (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.1), tubulovillous and villous histology (HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.6 and HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.6, respectively) at index polypectomy were statistically significant risk factors for developing metachronous adenomatous polyps. The standardized incidence rates (SIR) for CRC was 0.52 (95% CI 0.25-0.95). The SIR was increased in subjects with severe dysplasia (2.8; 95% CI 0.34-1.02). Some features of large bowel adenomas are strongly correlated with an increased risk of metachronous adenomas and colorectal cancer. However, the endoscopic polypectomy is able to reduce by 50% the incidence of CRC in patients with large bowel adenomas.     

Prevalence of Colorectal Cancer in Relatives of Iranian Patients Diagnosed with Colorectal Cancer

Background: A high rate of colorectal cancer occurrence is established in individuals with a positive familyhistory of this type of cancer. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of colorectalcancer in first degree and second degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Methods: Family medical historiesof 489 first degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients were obtained by a questionnaire. 249 average riskpatients with no family history of colorectal cancer were included as control patients. Results: In our study froma total of 489 case patients, 153 (31.3%) had at least one close relative affected by colon cancer. Case-controlanalysis showed an odd ratio of 3.1 (95% CI, 2.07 to 6.27) for one and 5.7 (CI, 2.39 to 13.56) for two affectedrelatives. Cases with a positive family history had a 3.006 times greater risk in developing colorectal cancer if afirst degree relative was affected comparing with a 4.898 time greater risk if a second degree family memberwas diagnosed with colorectal cancer .Our study indicated a higher risk for developing colorectal cancer in malefamily relatives 50 years and older. Rectal area was found the most tumor side affected in case and controlpatients. Conclusion: First-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer had an increased risk of developingthis type of cancer. The risk was greater when diagnosis was in male, elderly patients and other first-degreerelatives were affected.     

Bowel movement frequency and risk of colorectal cancer in a large cohort study of Japanese men and women

The relationship between bowel movement (BM) frequency and the risk of colorectal cancer was examined in a large cohort of 25 731 men and 37 198 women living in 24 communities in Japan. At enrolment, each participant completed a self-administrated questionnaire on BM frequency and laxative use. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox's proportional-hazard model. During the follow-up period (average length 7.6 years), 649 cases of colorectal cancer, including 429 cases of colon cancer, were identified. Among women, subjects who reported a BM every 2-3 days had the lowest risk of developing colorectal (IRR=0.71, 95% CI=0.52-0.97) and colon cancer (IRR=0.70, 95% CI=0.49-1.00), whereas those reporting a BM every 6 days or less had an increased risk of developing colorectal (IRR=2.47, 95% CI=1.01-6.01) and colon cancer (IRR=2.52, 95% CI=0.93-6.82) compared with those reporting >or=1 BM per day. A similar, but nonsignificant, association between the frequency of BM and cancer risk was observed in men. There was no association between colorectal or colon cancer risk and laxative use. Regulating BM frequency might therefore have a role in the prevention of colorectal cancer.     

Italian mediterranean index and risk of colorectal cancer in the Italian section of the EPIC cohort

Colorectal cancer is among the commonest cancers worldwide. Dietary factors have been linked to colorectal cancer risk, however, few studies have evaluated the relationship between a priori dietary patterns and colorectal cancer risk. We evaluated the effect of adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern, as measured by the Italian Mediterranean Index, on the risk of colorectal cancer in the 45,275 participants of the Italian section of the EPIC study who completed a dietary questionnaire. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for colorectal cancer in relation to categories of Italian Mediterranean Index score were estimated by multivariate Cox models adjusted for known risk factors, on the whole cohort, on men and women and according to cancer subsite. During a mean follow‐up of 11.28 years, 435 colorectal cancer cases were identified. The Italian Mediterranean Index was inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.35–0.71 for the highest category compared to the lowest, P‐trend: 0.043). Results did not differ by sex. Highest Italian Mediterranean Index score was also significantly associated with reduced risks of any colon cancer (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.81), distal colon cancer (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26–0.75) and rectal cancer (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20–0.81), but not of proximal colon cancer. These findings suggest that adherence to a Mediterranean diet (as measured by the Italian Mediterranean Index) protects against colorectal cancer in general but not against cancer developing in the proximal colon.     

Allergy and other selected diseases and risk of colorectal cancer

It has been reported that allergy and other diseases may be related to colorectal cancer risk. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic analysis using information about medical histories specifically to see if there was any relation between allergies or other medical conditions and colorectal cancer risk. A multicentric case-control study was conducted in six Italian areas between 1992 and 1996 on 1225 incident cases of colon cancer, 728 cases of rectal cancer and 4154 controls comparable with cases according to sex and age group, admitted for acute conditions to the same network of hospitals where cases had been identified. Unconditional logistic regression models including terms for sex, age, study centre, years of education, body mass index, physical activity, smoking, history of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives and energy intake were used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of colon and rectal cancer according to history of allergy and other selected diseases. The OR for history of allergy was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.67-1.14) for colon and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.44-0.92) for rectal cancer, and the inverse association was stronger when allergy was diagnosed at age 35 years or more, or less than 10 years before the cancer diagnosis. No clear pattern emerged in strata of age and sex. History of other selected diseases, including hypertension and cholelithiasis, was not related to colon or rectal cancer risk, though there was a moderate increase in the risk of colon cancer (OR = 1.18, 95% CI, 0.66-2.14) in patients with a history of intestinal polyps. This study lends support to the hypothesis that allergic individuals may be at a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer.     

Prevalence and Characteristics of Colorectal Polyps in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Iranian Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy from 2009-2013

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in males and the second in femalesin Iran. Males are more likely to develop CRC than women and age is considered as a main risk factor forcolorectal cancer. Prevalence of colorectal cancer has been increasing in Asian countries. Aim: The object of thisstudy was to determine the clinical and pathology characteristics of colorectal polyps in Iranian patients andto investigate the variation between our populations with other populations. Materials and Methods: A total of167 patients with colorectal polyps were included in our study. All underwent colonoscopy during 2009-2013and specimens were taken through polypectomy and transferred to pathology. All data in patient files includingpathology reports were collected and analyzed by SPSS 16 software. A two-tailed test was used and a P-value of< 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Mean age of participants was 57±15. Some 84 were females (50.3%)and 83 males (49.7%). Total of 225 polyps were detected which 119 (52.9%) were in males and 106 (47.1%) werein females. Solitary polyps were observed in 124 patients (74%), 26 (15.6%) had two polyps and 17 (10.1%)with more than two polyps (three to five). Rectosigmoid was the site of most of the polyps (63.1%), followedby 19.6% in the descending colon, 7.6% in the transverse, 5.8% in the ascending, and 3.1% in the cecum, databeing missing in two cases. Conclusions: Recto sigmoid was site of most of the polyps. The most prevalent typeof lesion was adenomatous polyps detected in 78 (34.7%). Mixed hyperplastic adenomatous type observed in 70(31.1%). This high prevalence of adenomatous polyps in Iranian patients implies the urgent need for screeningplans to prevent further healthcare problems with colorectal cancer in the Iranian population.     

Cholecystectomy and the risk for developing colorectal cancer and distal colorectal adenomas

Earlier work describes a modest association between cholecystectomy and the risk of colorectal cancer. We conducted a prospective study of 85 184 women, 36-61 years old, who had no history of cancer to evaluate whether known risk factors for colorectal cancer, including dietary history, that have not been controlled for in previous analyses can help explain the observed association. During 16 years of follow-up, 877 cases of colorectal cancer were documented and 1452 women who underwent endoscopy during the follow-up time were diagnosed with distal adenomas. After adjustment for age and other known or suspected risk factors, we found a significant, positive association between cholecystectomy and the risk of colorectal cancer (multivariate relative risk RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.46). The risk was highest for cancers of the proximal colon (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.97-1.88) and the rectum (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.05-2.36). However, we did not observe a significant association between cholecystectomy and distal colorectal adenomas. In this large prospective cohort study, a history of cholecystectomy appears to increase modestly the risk of colorectal cancer, even after adjustment for other colorectal cancer risk factors.     

Dietary marine n-3 fatty acids in relation to risk of distal colorectal adenoma in women.

Epidemiologic studies of dietary marine n-3 fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer have been inconsistent, and their relation to risk of colorectal adenoma has not been evaluated in detail. We examined dietary marine n-3 fatty acids and the ratio of marine n-3 to total n-6 fatty acids (n-3/n-6 ratio) in relation to risk of adenoma of the distal colon or rectum among 34,451 U.S. women who were initially free of colorectal cancer or polyps, who completed a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire in 1980, and who underwent endoscopy from 1980 to 1998. We documented 1,719 distal colorectal adenoma cases (705 large adenomas, 897 small adenomas, 1,280 distal colon adenomas, and 505 rectal adenomas) during 18 years of follow-up. Neither dietary marine n-3 fatty acids nor n-3/n-6 ratio were associated with risk of total distal colorectal adenoma after adjustment for age and established risk factors [multivariable relative risk (RR) for extreme quintiles of dietary marine n-3 fatty acids = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.84-1.27, P(trend) = 0.66; RR for extreme quintiles of n-3/n-6 ratio = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.83-1.25; P(trend) = 0.86]. Similarly, no significant associations were observed separately for distal colon or rectal adenoma. However, higher intake of dietary marine n-3 fatty acids was nonsignificantly but suggestively inversely associated with large adenoma (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.01; P(trend) = 0.16) but directly associated with small adenoma (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.81; P(trend) = 0.09). Our findings do not support the hypothesis that a higher intake of marine n-3 fatty acids or a higher n-3/n-6 ratio reduces the risk of distal colorectal adenoma but are suggestive that higher intake may reduce the progression of small adenomas to large adenomas.     

Screening endoscopy and risk of colorectal cancer in United States men

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe the effect of screening endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Methods: We used data from a prospective cohort study of 24,744 men aged 40 to 75 years in 1986, free from cancer and colon polyps, followed until 1994. The outcomes are diagnosis of colorectal cancer and death from colorectal cancer. Results: Screening endoscopy in 1986-87 was associated with a lower risk of all colorectal cancer (multivariate relative risk [RR]=0.58, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.36-0.96); cancer in the distal colon or rectum (multivariate RR=0.40, CI=0.19-0.84); Dukes stage A&B (multivariate RR=0.66, CI=0.35-1.25); and Dukes stage C&D (multivariate RR=0.50, CI=0.20-1.26) colorectal cancer; and death from colorectal cancer (multivariate RR=0.56, CI=0.20-1.60), after adjusting for age and a wide range of colon cancer risk factors. Screening endoscopy in 1988-87 appeared to provide strong protection against distal stage C&D cancers (age-adjusted RR=0.16, CI=0.02-1.23) but no protection against proximal stage C&D cancers (age-adjusted RR=0.96, CI=0.32-2.91). Conclusions: This study provides strong evidence for a protective effect of screening sigmoidoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality and supports recommendations for screening sigmoidoscopy as an approach to colon cancer prevention.