肺癌手术中淋巴结清扫的现状与进展

淋巴结转移是肺癌主要而常见的转移途径,也是术后癌残留而导致复发和转移的主要因素,肺癌手术中纵隔、肺门淋巴结清扫至关重要。但目前淋巴结的清扫方式尚不统一,有系统淋巴结清扫术（CMLND）、根治性淋巴结清扫术、淋巴结采样、系统淋巴结采样以及前哨淋巴结技术导航切除,并且随着微创外科的发展,胸腔镜下淋巴结清扫也日趋成熟。而寻求一个更规范、更完善的淋巴结清扫方式甚有必要。现就目前肺癌手术中纵隔、肺门淋巴结清扫的临床意义、清扫方式、清扫范围以及胸腔镜下淋巴结清扫的现状以及展望进行综述。     

Clinical feasibility and surgical benefits of video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of resectable lung cancer

Objective: This study was performed to assess the clinical feasibility and surgical outcomes of video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of resectable lung cancer. Methods: Between July 2004 and December 2009, we retrospectively analyzed 108 consecutive video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomies in lung cancer patients from a prospectively collected database. Ninety-seven (89.8%) patients underwent combined operation during the same anesthesia and six (5.3%) patients underwent a staged operation for the resection of lung cancer and systematic lymphadenectomy. We reviewed the indication and duration of video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy, its complication, combined or staged operation type, the number of dissected lymph nodes and nodal stations, and pathologic staging of the mediastinal node. Results: Mean operative time of video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy was 39.8 ± 12.3 min (range of 14–85 min). Mean number of resected lymph nodes was 16.0 ± 7.7 (range of 3–37). In video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy, the rates of lymph node dissection of stations 4R, 4L, and 7 were 71.3%, 88.0%, and 100%, respectively, whereas the rates of dissection of lymph nodes in station 2R and 2L were only 22.2% and 17.6%, respectively. There was no operative mortality. We identified five complications of recurrent nerve palsy. Conclusions: Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy is a clinically feasible procedure with acceptable complication rate and provides more accurate staging of mediastinal node in lung cancer patients. It may be also an excellent supplementary technique used for complete mediastinal node dissection at minimal invasive surgery for cancer resection, especially with left-sided video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.     

Decision making about operability in non-small cell lung cancer

With the introduction of combined modality therapy and better staging techniques, the role of surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer is continuously redefined. The final aim of surgical treatment for lung cancer is complete resection, also after neoadjuvant or induction therapy. Precise criteria for complete resection have recently been defined. Definite indications for surgery include clinical stages I, II and resectable IIIA. The precise role for surgical resection in stage IIIA-N2 lung cancer remains controversial but only downstaged patients should be considered. Stage IIIB is mostly treated by chemoradiotherapy. Accurate peroperative or surgical staging is necessary, as well regarding the tumour as nodal factor, to determine the extent of resection. A systematic nodal dissection should be performed including at least three hilar and three mediastinal lymph node stations. Post-induction surgical therapy often represents a greater technical challenge due to a pronounced hilar and mediastinal fibrosis. Downstaging is an important prognostic factor and persisting mediastinal lymph node involvement carries a poor prognosis. The optimal restaging method has not been established yet, but a pathological proof should be obtained. Remediastinoscopy is feasible with an acceptable accuracy but less invasive techniques are currently evaluated.     

Does the extent of lymph node dissection influence outcome in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic effect of the extent of lymph node dissection performed in patients with a stage pI non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We analysed data on 465 patients with stage I NSCLC who were treated with surgical resection and some form of lymph node sampling. The median number of lymph node sampled was 10 and the median number of ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node stations sampled was two. We chose to define a procedure that harvested 10 or more lymph nodes and sampled two or more ipsilateral mediastinal stations as a lymphadenectomy, by contrast with sampling when one or both criteria were not satisfied. The effect of the surgical techniques: lymph node sampling (LS; n=207) vs. lymphadenectomy (LA; n=258) on 30-day mortality and overall survival were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 6244 lymph nodes was examined, including 4306 mediastinal lymph nodes. The mean (+/-SD) numbers of removed lymph nodes were 7+/-6.1 per patient following LS vs.18.6+/-9.3 following LA (P=0.001). An average mean of 1+/-0.90 mediastinal lymph node station per patient was sampled following LS vs. 2.7+/-0.8 following LA (P<10(-6)). Overall 30-day mortality rates were 2.4 and 3.1%, respectively. LA was disclosed as a favourable prognosticator at multivariate analysis (Hazard Risk: 1.43; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.00-2.04; P=0.048), together with younger patient age, absence of blood vessels invasion, and smaller tumour size. CONCLUSIONS: Importance of lymph node dissection affects patients outcome, while it does not enhance the operative mortality. A minimum of 10 lymph nodes assessed, and two mediastinal stations sampled are suggested as possible pragmatic markers of the quality of lymphadenectomy.     

Verteilungsmuster und Befall regionärer Lymphknoten bei nicht-kleinzelligem Bronchialcarcinom

Despite the important role of lymph node infiltration for the classification and prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), no standards exist to evaluate the quality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Researches at several centers are not convinced that complete ipsilateral lymphadenectomy is necessary. We investigated 270 consecutive patients undergoing a potential curative operation for NSCLC including complete ipsilateral lymph node dissection in order to ascertain whether or not there is a correlation between tumor localization and lymph node infiltration. Patients were classified into the UICC (1987) stages I (n = 115), II (n = 42), and IIIa (n = 113). In patients with N1-positive lymph nodes (n = 61) we found higher 5-year survival for patients with only intrapulmonary lymph node infiltration (39%) than for patients with hilar infiltration (21%). Patients with N2 disease showed skip metastases in up to 81% of cases. We found that no tumor location predicted the lymph node infiltration. Due to the variability of lymph node infiltration and the frequently occurring skip metastases, complete ipsilateral lymphadenectomy should be the standard for curative operations for NSCLC.     

ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer.

The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) organized a workshop dealing with lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. The objective of this workshop was to develop guidelines for definitions and the surgical procedures of intraoperative lymph node staging, and the pathologic evaluation of resected lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Relevant peer-reviewed publications on the subjects, the experience of the participants, and the opinion of the ESTS members contributing on line, were used to reach a consensus. Systematic nodal dissection is recommended in all cases to ensure complete resection. Lobe-specific systematic nodal dissection is acceptable for peripheral squamous T1 tumors, if hilar and interlobar nodes are negative on frozen section studies; it implies removal of, at least, three hilar and interlobar nodes and three mediastinal nodes from three stations in which the subcarinal is always included. Selected lymph node biopsies and sampling are justified to prove nodal involvement when resection is not possible. Pathologic evaluation includes all lymph nodes resected separately and those remaining in the lung specimen. Sections are done at the site of gross abnormalities. If macroscopic inspection does not detect any abnormal site, 2-mm slices of the nodes in the longitudinal plane are recommended. Routine search for micrometastases or isolated tumor cells in hematoxylin-eosin negative nodes would be desirable. Randomized controlled trials to evaluate adjuvant therapies for patients with these conditions are recommended. The adherence to these guidelines will standardize the intraoperative lymph node staging and pathologic evaluation, and improve pathologic staging, which will help decide on the best adjuvant therapy.     

Surgical assessment and intraoperative management of mediastinal lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer

Mediastinal lymph node status has important prognostic and therapeutic implications for nonsmall cell lung cancer patients. Consequently, an accurate pathologic assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes for metastasis is essential. Despite the significance of nodal assessment, practice patterns among surgeons vary widely. Therefore we reviewed the literature to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the ideal means and extent of preoperative and intraoperative pathologic mediastinal lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer patients. We found that the most sensitive and accurate intraoperative method is a complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. Pathologic evaluation of at least 10 mediastinal lymph node from at least three stations should be performed at the time of surgery.     

直径≤3cm的周围型非小细胞肺癌纵隔淋巴结转移规律的初步研究

目的探讨直径≤3cm的周围型非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)纵隔淋巴结转移的情况,分析早期周围型NSCLC纵隔淋巴结转移的规律。方法 2000年1月1日～2008年12月31日治疗直径≤3cm的周围型NSCLC161例,男89例,女72例,年龄(63.4±10.7)岁,行肺叶切除或肺局限性切除加系统性纵隔淋巴结清扫术,分析其临床特征、病理特点及纵隔淋巴结转移规律。结果全组手术顺利,无死亡及严重并发症发生。肺叶切除153例,肺楔形切除7例,肺段切除1例。全组共清扫淋巴结2456枚,平均每例4.5±1.6组、13.1±7.3枚。术后病理:腺癌99例,鳞癌30例,肺泡细胞癌19例,其他类型肺癌13例。术后TNM分期:ⅠA期50例,ⅠB期62例,ⅡA期6例,ⅡB期10例,ⅢA期33例。N1组淋巴结转移率为23.6%(38/161),N2组转移率为20.5%(33/161),其中隆突下淋巴结转移率为8.1%(13/161),跳跃式纵隔转移率为6.8%(11/161),全组未发现下纵隔淋巴结转移。肺泡细胞癌及直径≤2cm的鳞癌、直径≤1cm的腺癌均无pN2转移。上肺癌发生pN2转移时上纵隔100%(19/19)受累,其中21.1%(4/19)同时伴有隆突下淋巴结转移;下肺癌则除主要转移至隆突下外(64.3%,9/14),还常直接单独转移至上纵隔(35.7%,5/14)。转移的纵隔淋巴结左肺癌主要分布在第5、6、7组,右肺癌主要分布在第3、4、7组。结论对于直径≤3cm的周围型NSCLC,肿瘤直径越大,其纵隔淋巴结转移率越高,肺泡细胞癌、直径≤2cm的鳞癌和≤1cm的腺癌其纵隔淋巴结转移率相对较低;上肺癌主要转移在上纵隔,下肺癌则隆突下及上纵隔均可转移;第5、6、7组淋巴结是左肺癌主要转移的位置,第3、4、7组是右肺癌主要转移的位置,术中应重点清扫。     

Decision Making about Operability in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

With the introduction of combined modality therapy and better staging techniques, the role of surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer is continuously redefined.

The final aim of surgical treatment for lung cancer is complete resection, also after neoadjuvant or induction therapy. Precise criteria for complete resection have recently been defined.

Definite indications for surgery include clinical stages I, II and resectable IIIA. The precise role for surgical resection in stage IIIA-N2 lung cancer remains controversial but only downstaged patients should be considered. Stage IIIB is mostly treated by chemoradiotherapy. Accurate peroperative or surgical staging is necessary, as well regarding the tumour as nodal factor, to determine the extent of resection. A systematic nodal dissection should be performed including at least three hilar and three mediastinal lymph node stations.

Post-induction surgical therapy often represents a greater technical challenge due to a pronounced hilar and mediastinal fibrosis. Downstaging is an important prognostic factor and persisting mediastinal lymph node involvement carries a poor prognosis. The optimal restaging method has not been established yet, but a pathological proof should be obtained. Remediastinoscopy is feasible with an acceptable accuracy but less invasive techniques are currently evaluated.     

Mediastinal lymph nodes: Ignore? Sample? Dissect? The role of mediastinal node dissection in the surgical management of primary lung cancer

The role of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) during the resection of non-small-cell lung cancer is still unclear although most surgeons agree that a minimum of hilar and mediastinal nodes must be examined for appropriate pathological staging. Current surgical practices vary from visual inspection of the mediastinum with biopsy of only abnormal looking nodes to systematic mediastinal node sampling which is to the biopsy of lymph nodes from multiple levels whether they appear abnormal or not to MLND which involves the systematic removal of all lymph node bearing tissue from multiple sites unilaterally or bilaterally within the mediastinum. This review article looks at the evidence and arguments in favour of lymphadenectomy, including improved pathological staging, better locoregional control, and ultimately longer disease-free survival and those against which are longer operating time, increased operative morbidity, and lack of evidence for survival benefit.     

非小细胞肺癌淋巴结清扫方式临床研究

目的 比较非小细胞肺癌不同纵隔淋巴结清扫方式间的差异,为规范化开展肺癌淋巴结清扫临床研究提供依据.方法 在202例Ⅰa-Ⅲa期肺癌中进行前瞻性临床对照试验,比较常规清扫(RMLD)和全纵隔骨骼化清扫(SCLD)两种术式,分析手术经过和术后病理分期情况.结果 RMLD 107例,SCLD 95例.两组术前一般情况、临床分期及肺切除方式无明显差异,SCLD组平均扫除淋巴结组数显著高于RMLD组(8.9组对6.2组,P＜0.001),术后总体并发症(14.7%对14.0%,P=0.884)和病死率(2.1%对1.9%,P=0.904)无差异,但SCLD组分别有3例(3.2%)右侧乳糜胸和左侧喉返神经损伤发生.术后病理证实两组组织学类型及分期无明显差异,RNLD和SCLD组pN2分别占27.1%和24.2%(P=0.888),跳跃性纵隔转移率(RMLD 9.3%对SCLD 7.4%,P=0.613)以及纵隔多组转移率(RMLD 15.0%对SCLD 16.8%,P=0.714)亦无明显差异.分析纵隔各组淋巴结转移率发现上叶肺癌下纵隔转移率＜5%,而中、下叶肺癌上、下纵隔转移率均＞10%;cT1病例以及低度恶性肿瘤无一发生纵隔转移.结论 对非小细胞肺癌行常规纵隔清扫可达到与全纵隔骨骼化清扫同样的分期效果,后者手术风险并不高于常规清扫,但应避免右侧乳糜胸和左侧喉返神经损伤的发生;上叶肺癌仅需扫除上纵隔淋巴结而无需常规清扫下纵隔;早早期肺癌以及低度恶性肿瘤没有必要进行常规纵隔清扫.     

Improved staging using intraoperative ultrasound for mediastinal lymphadenectomy in non-small lung cancer surgery

BackgroundExtent of lymph node involvement in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the cornerstone of staging and influences both multimodality treatment and final outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate accuracy and characteristics of intraoperative ultrasound guided systematic mediastinal nodal dissection in patients with resected NSCLC.MethodsFrom January 2008 to June 2013, 244 patients undergoing intraoperative surgical staging after radical surgery for NSCLC were included in prospective study. The patients were divided in two groups according to systematic mediastinal nodal dissection: 124 patients in intraoperative ultrasound nodal dissection guided group and 120 in standard nodal dissection group. The lymph nodes were mapped by their number and station and histopathologic evaluation was performed.ResultsOperating time was prolonged for 10 min in patients with ultrasound guided mediastinal nodal dissection, but number and stations of evaluated lymph nodes were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the same group. Skip nodal metastases were found in 24% of patients without N1 nodal involvement. Twelve (10%) patients were upstaged using US guided mediastinal lymphadenectomy. In US guided group 5-year survival rate was 59% and in the group of standard systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy 43% (p = 0.001) Standard staging system seemed to be improved in ultrasound guided mediastinal lymphadenectomy patients. Complication rate showed no difference between analyzed groups.ConclusionHigher number and location of analyzed mediastinal nodal stations in patients with resected NSCLC using ultrasound is suggested to be of great oncological significance. Our results indicate that intraoperative ultrasound may have important staging implications.     

Is sampling really effective in staging non-small cell lung cancer? A prospective study

Is sampling really effective in staging non-small cell lung cancer? The aim of the study was to assess if systematic nodal dissection is necessary in order to stage non-small cell lung cancer correctly or whether mediastinal lymph node sampling can be used and whether in selected cases it could replace systematic nodal dissection for the treatment of lung cancer. A prospective study was conducted in 94 patients affected by clinically resectable non-small cell lung cancer (stages I-IIIB) who were surgically treated by the same team of surgeons. During surgery mediastinal lymph node sampling was done first and then another surgeon completed the systematic nodal dissection and performed the lung resection. One hundred and ninety-three mediastinal nodal stations were investigated using the American Thoracic Society lymph node map to identify them. On analysing the 193 mediastinal nodal stations investigated, it emerged that in 181 cases (94%) mediastinal lymph node sampling and systematic nodal dissection yielded the same histopathological findings, whereas in 12 cases (6%) there was no agreement between the two techniques. The negative predictive value of mediastinal lymph node sampling was 92.8% (103/111). The results of the study show no statistical difference between mediastinal lymph node sampling and systematic nodal dissection in staging non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is possible that in a limited percentage of cases a nodal station could be understaged and thus the surgical resection could prove incomplete if mediastinal lymph node sampling alone is performed. Moreover, in those cases where mediastinal lymph node sampling detects N2 disease and systematic nodal dissection has not been completed, the intervention cannot be considered radical.     

Mediastinal lymph node infiltration in non-small cell lung cancer and its role in curative surgery.

Despite the importance of lymph node infiltration for the classification and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are no accepted standards for quality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy. In 270 consecutive patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for NSCLC, including complete ipsilateral lymph node dissection, we investigated the possibility of a correlation between tumour location and lymph node infiltration. The tumours were classified as UICC stage I (n = 115), II (n = 42) or IIIa (n = 113). Patients with N2-disease (n = 68) showed up to 81% skip metastasis. Because of the observed dissemination of lymph node metastasis, tumour location could not predict nodal infiltration. The variability of nodal involvement and the frequent occurrence of skip metastasis thus make complete ipsilateral lymphadenectomy mandatory for curative management of NSCLC.     

临床Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌全胸腔镜与开胸纵隔淋巴结清扫的对比研究

目的评价临床Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者全胸腔镜纵隔淋巴结清扫的效果。方法回顾性研究2003年1月～2009年7月间连续282例临床Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌的资料,152例接受全胸腔镜手术,另130例为开胸手术,对比2组清扫纵隔淋巴结组数、枚数、各区域淋巴结枚数和淋巴结清扫相关并发症。结果胸腔镜组与开胸组纵隔淋巴结清扫组数[中位数4组（3～6组）vs4组（3～7组）,Z=0.603,P=0.544）和枚数[（13.7±6.1）vs（14.6±7.2）,t=-1.136,P=0.257）差异无显著性,各区域（右侧上纵隔、中下纵隔,左侧主动脉弓周围、中下纵隔）两组间淋巴结清扫枚数差异亦无显著性（P〉0.05）。淋巴结清扫相关并发症（胸腔镜组乳糜胸2例,开胸组乳糜胸2例、喉返神经损伤1例,χ2=0.031,P=0.860）和胸腔引流时间[（8.1±3.9）dvs（8.6±4.1）d,t=-1.048,P=0.296]也未到达统计学差异。结论全胸腔镜纵隔淋巴结清扫可以达到等同传统开胸手术的效果,且不增加并发症。     

Pulmonary T2N0 adenocarcinoma with metastasis to a lymph node in the thoracic wall.

We experienced a rare case of lung cancer without hilar/mediastinal nodal involvement or direct invasion to the thoracic wall, but with metastasis to a lymph node in the thoracic wall. A 72-year-old woman with lung cancer was admitted to our hospital for the surgical therapy. She had suffered from right pleuritis in her childhood. During the dissection of the pleural adhesion around the whole lung, one small black lymph node was found in the thoracic wall and resected. Then, right middle and lower lobectomy and systematic nodal dissection were performed. The postoperative pathological examination revealed that nodal involvement was not observed in all samples except in the lymph node in the thoracic wall. In lung cancer patients with broad pleural adhesion, we should pay attention to lymph nodes in the thoracic wall. If we find them, the nodes should be resected for accurate staging.     

Pulmonary T2N0 adenocarcinoma with metastasis to a lymph node in the thoracic wall

We experienced a rare case of lung cancer without hilar/mediastinal nodal involvement or direct invasion to the thoracic wall, but with metastasis to a lymph node in the thoracic wall. A 72-year-old woman with lung cancer was admitted to our hospital for the surgical therapy. She had suffered from right pleuritis in her childhood. During the dissection of the pleural adhesion around the whole lung, one small black lymph node was found in the thoracic wall and resected. Then, right middle and lower lobectomy and systematic nodal dissection were performed. The postoperative pathological examination revealed that nodal involvement was not observed in all samples except in the lymph node in the thoracic wall. In lung cancer patients with broad pleural adhesion, we should pay attention to lymph nodes in the thoracic wall. If we find them, the nodes should be resected for accurate staging.     

Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis found during pulmonary metastasectomy for extrapulmonary carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis in cancer patients is well documented. Pulmonary metastasectomy in selected patients is associated with improved survival. Little is known about the prognostic significance of lymph node metastases found during pulmonary metastasectomy for extrapulmonary carcinoma metastatic to the lung. METHODS: The records of all patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy and complete mediastinal lymph node dissection for extrapulmonary carcinomas at our institution from November 1985 through July 1999 were reviewed. RESULTS: Eight hundred eighty-three patients underwent pulmonary metastasectomy. Of these, 70 patients (7.9%) (44 men, 26 women) had concomitant complete lymphadenectomy. Median age was 64 years (range, 33 to 83 years). Median time interval between primary tumor resection and metastasectomy was 34 months (range, 0 to 188 months). Wedge excision was performed in 46 patients, lobectomy in 16, both in 7, and pneumonectomy in 1. Lymph node metastases were found in 20 patients (28.6%) and were classified as intrapulmonary or hilar (N1) in 9, mediastinal (N2) in 8, and both in 3. There were no operative deaths. Median follow-up was 6.6 years (range, 1.1 to 14.6 years). Three-year survival for patients with negative lymph nodes was 69% as compared with only 38% for those with positive lymph nodes (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of lymph node metastases at the time of pulmonary metastasectomy for extrapulmonary carcinoma has an adverse effect on prognosis. Complete mediastinal lymph node dissection should be considered at the time of pulmonary metastasectomy for carcinoma to improve staging and guide treatment.     

Transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy--the new operative technique and early results in lung cancer staging.

OBJECTIVE: Mediastinal staging is one of the most important problems in thoracic surgery. Although the pathological examination is a generally accepted standard, none of the currently used techniques enables complete removal of all lymph node stations of the mediastinum. The aim of the study is to present a new technique of transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenctomy (TEMLA) and to analyze its value in lung cancer staging. METHODS: In the prospective study of consecutive group of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, operated on between January and August 2004, we evaluated the usefulness of this original technique of bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy, assessing its accuracy and safety. The operations were performed through the transcervical approach, were videomediastinoscopy-assisted, with sternum elevation. Lymph node stations 1, 2R, 2L, 3a, 4R, 4L, 5, 6, 7 and 8 were removed. In patients without mediastinal metastases thoracotomy with pulmonary resection was performed and mediastinum searched for any missed lymph nodes. RESULTS: There were 83 patients operated on with the TEMLA technique. The mean number of nodes removed was 43 (range: 26-85). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the presented method in detecting mediastinal node metastases were: 90, 100, and 96%, respectively, whereas the positive and negative predictive values were: 100 and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TEMLA technique is a safe and highly accurate method of mediastinal staging in NSCLC.     

Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery a feasible approach for clinical N0 and postoperatively pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer?

Objective: It remains controversial whether video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) major pulmonary resection (VMPR) with systematic node dissection (SND) is a feasible approach for clinical N0 and pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer (cN0-pN2 NSCLC). We compared the clinical outcome of patients who underwent VMPR with SND for cN0-pN2 NSCLC with the outcome of patients who underwent MPR with SND by thoracotomy. We conducted this study to determine the feasibility of VMPR for cN0 and pN2 NSCLC patients and intraoperative node staging by node sampling. Methods: Between 1997 and 2006, 770 patients underwent MPR with SND for NSCLC, wherein 450 patients had VMPR and 320 were subjected to open thoracotomy. There were 673 clinical N0 patients. Among them, we retrospectively reviewed 69 patients (10.3%) with cN0-pN2 NSCLC of which the greatest tumor dimension ranged from 20 to 50 mm. These patients were divided into two groups: 37 patients under group V, who underwent VMPR, and 32 patients under group T, who underwent MPR by thoracotomy, for cN0-pN2 NSCLC. The majority of the patients underwent postoperative chemotherapy. Results: There were no differences between the two groups regarding preoperative data or the number of nodes dissected. The rate of nodal metastasis (number of metastatic nodes/number of dissected nodes) was similar between the two groups (group V vs group T, 0.24 vs 0.24 in total nodes dissected, 0.24 vs 0.23 in mediastinal nodes dissected). The 3-year and 5-year recurrence-free survivals were similar (60.9% vs 49.6% and 60.9% vs 49.6%), as well. Most of the pattern of recurrence was due to remote metastasis. In like manner, the 3-year and 5-year survivals were similar (67.6% vs 57.7% and 45.4% vs 41.1%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that VMPR with SND is a feasible surgical therapy for cN0-pN2 NSCLC without loss of curability. It is unnecessary to convert the VATS approach to thoracotomy in order to do SND even if pN2 disease is revealed during VMPR.