<Emphasis Type="Italic">MGMT</Emphasis> promoter methylation in non-neoplastic brain

O⁶–methylguanine–DNA–methyltransferase (MGMT) is mainly regulated by cytosine–guanine island promoter methylation that is believed to occur only in neoplastic tissue. The present study was undertaken to investigate whether methylation occurs also in non-neoplastic brains by collecting 45 non-neoplastic brains from autopsies and 56 lobectomy specimens from epileptic surgeries. The promoter methylation status of MGMT was studied by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ), while protein expression was studied by immunohistochemical stain (IHC). The methylation rates, as determined by MSP and PSQ, were 3.0 % (3/101) and 2.9 % (2/69), respectively. Of note, no case had positive result concomitantly from both MSP and PSQ (3 were MSP+/PSQ? and 2 were MSP?/PSQ+), and all the positive samples were further confirmed by cloning and Sanger sequencing. All the methylated cases, except for those having indeterminate IHC results from autopsy specimens, revealed no loss of MGMT protein expression and similar staining pattern to that of the unmethylated cases. In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that MGMT promoter methylation could occur in a low percentage of non-neoplastic brains but did not affect the status of protein expression, which could be regarded as a normal variation in non-neoplastic brains.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">MGMT</Emphasis> promoter methylation in malignant gliomas

The O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene is located at chromosome 10q26 and codes for a DNA repair enzyme that—if active—can counteract the effects of alkylating chemotherapy. Malignant gliomas often have the MGMT gene inactivated due to aberrant methylation of its promoter region. The assessment of the MGMT promoter methylation status has become of clinical relevance as a molecular marker associated with response to alkylating chemotherapy and prolonged survival of glioblastoma patients. MGMT promoter methylation testing is also on the merge of being used as a marker for patient selection within clinical trials, e.g., the current CENTRIC trial that is specifically focusing on patients with MGMT promoter-methylated glioblastomas. In anaplastic gliomas, MGMT promoter methylation is a favorable prognostic marker independent of the type of therapy, i.e., radio- or chemotherapy. This occurrence might be associated with the high incidence of other prognostically favorable molecular markers in these tumors, such as IDH1 mutation, 1p/19q deletion or yet to be identified novel aberrations. A variety of different methods are being used to assess MGMT promoter methylation in clinical samples, which may give rise to inter-laboratory variations in test results. Immunohistochemical determination of MGMT protein expression has not proven reliable for diagnostic purposes. This brief review article aims to summarize the main aspects of MGMT promoter methylation testing in contemporary neuro-oncology, in particular its value as a clinically useful molecular marker, putting it into the context of other molecular markers of clinical use in gliomas of adult patients.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">BRAF</Emphasis>/K-<Emphasis Type="Italic">ras</Emphasis> mutation,microsatellite instability,and promoter hypermethylation of <Emphasis Type="Italic">hMLH1</Emphasis>/<Emphasis Type="Italic">MGMT</Emphasis> in human gastric carcinomas

Background The BRAF and K-ras genes are the most frequently mutated oncogenes in various human malignancies. We examined BRAF and K-ras mutations in human gastric cancer, and investigated their relationship with microsatellite instability (MSI) and the hypermethylation of promoter regions in hMLH1 and O ⁶ -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT).Methods Sixteen gastric cancer cell lines and 62 gastric cancer tissue samples were screened for BRAF and K-ras mutations by direct sequencing. We also performed a microsatellite assay and investigated methylation status in the promoter regions of hMLH1 and MGMT.Results mutation was not found in any of the cancer cell lines examined. One (1.6%) cancer tissue sample showed a point mutation in the BRAF gene (GT_G GA_G; V599E). K-ras mutation (GG_T GA_T, G12D) was detected in five (31%) gastric cancer cell lines and in 1 (1.6%) gastric cancer tissue sample. In the gastric cancer tissue samples examined, MSI was detected in 23 (37%) samples. Hypermethylated promoter regions in hMLH1 and MGMT, respectively, were detected in 6 (10%) and 13 (21%) gastric cancer tissue samples. Microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors showed frequent lymphatic invasion (P = 0.050).Conclusion Although BRAF mutation has been reported in a variety of other human cancers, it is a rare event in the carcinogenesis and progression/development of gastric cancer.     

Frequent but borderline methylation of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> p16</Emphasis><Superscript>INK4a</Superscript> and<Emphasis Type="Italic"> TIMP3</Emphasis> in medulloblastoma and sPNET revealed by quantitative analyses

Certain risk groups among tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) in children take an almost inevitably fatal course. The elucidation of molecular mechanisms offers hope for improved therapy. Aberrant methylation is common in malignant brain tumors of childhood and may have implications for stratification and therapy. Methylation of p16 ^INK4A, p14 ^ARF, TIMP3, CDH1, p15 ^INK4B and DAPK1 in medulloblastoma (MB) and ependymoma has been discussed controversially in the literature. DUTT1 and SOCS1 have not previously been analyzed. We examined methylation in MB, sPNET and ependymoma using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), quantitative Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis (COBRA) and direct and clone sequencing of bisulfite PCR products. We detected methylation of p16 ^INK4A (17/43), p14 ^ARF (11/42) and TIMP3 (9/44) in MB and others by MSP. CDH1 was not only methylated in MB (31/41), but also in normal controls. Evaluation of MSP results by quantitative COBRA and sequencing yielded methylation between the detection limits of COBRA (1%) and MSP (0.1%). Only p16 ^INK4A and TIMP3 were methylated consistently in medulloblastomas (p16 ^INK4A 14%, TIMP3 11%) and p16 ^INK4A also in anaplastic ependymomas (1/4 tumors). Methylation ranged from 1–5%. Evaluation of methylation using MSP has thus to be supplemented by quantitative methods. Our analyses raise the issue of the functional significance of low level methylation, which may disturb the delicate growth factor equilibrium within the cell. Therapeutic and diagnostic implications urge into depth analyses of methylation as a mechanism, which might fill some of the gaps of our understanding of brain tumor origin.     

Induction of apoptosis by <Emphasis Type="Italic">p53</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">bax</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">bcl-2</Emphasis>, and <Emphasis Type="Italic">p21</Emphasis> expressed in colorectal cancer

Background We investigated the influence of genes on the apoptosis of colorectal tumor cells, based on DNA and mRNA kinetics.Methods In 30 colorectal cancer patients, we examined the mRNA expression of p53, bax, bcl-2, and p21 ^WAF1 , and we also investigated the development of tumor cell apoptosis, using a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labeling (TUNEL) method.Results TUNEL-positive cells showed a positive correlation with bax (P = 0.010) and a negative correlation with p21 (P = 0.04). We also investigated the relationship between p53 point mutation, p21 immunostaining degree, and apoptosis, based on DNA ladder expression. A remarkable correlation (P = 0.0090) was found between p21 and apoptosis.Conclusions The present study findings suggest that tumor cell apoptosis is (1) strongly inhibited by p21, (2) induced by bax, and (3) influenced by bcl-2, which, presumably, inhibits tumor cell apoptosis.     

Managing Patient with Mutations in <Emphasis Type="Italic">PALB2</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">CHEK2</Emphasis>, or <Emphasis Type="Italic">ATM</Emphasis>

Purpose of Review

The use of panel testing of multiple cancer-causing genes has allowed to find a subset of patients with harmful mutations in moderate penetrance genes. While extensive information is available regarding patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants, information regarding these less common genes and their management remains scarce. The aim of this review is to discuss penetrance, incidence, and management recommendations for PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2.

Recent Findings

NCCN guidelines now provide management recommendation for patients with pathogenic variants in these genes. In addition, more widespread testing has provided more information on penetrance and incidence. Although this is a huge step toward improving quality of care, prospective studies are still needed. We summarize the NCCN and other guidelines/suggestions for these genes and deliver our insight on the matter based on the best information we could find.

Summary

PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2 are less penetrant than BRCA1–2 and have a different spectrum, suggesting differing management. Data about incidence and penetrance along with management recommendations for these genes are provided.

     

Aberrant methylation of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Polo-like kinase</Emphasis> CpG islands in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Plk4</Emphasis> heterozygous mice

Background  

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the most common cancers world-wide occurs twice as often in men compared to women. Predisposing conditions such as alcoholism, chronic viral hepatitis, aflatoxin B1 ingestion, and cirrhosis all contribute to the development of HCC.     

Selection of patients with germline <Emphasis Type="Italic">MLH1</Emphasis> mutated Lynch syndrome by determination of <Emphasis Type="Italic">MLH1</Emphasis> methylation and <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRAF</Emphasis> mutation

Lynch syndrome is one of the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome and is caused by germline mutations of MLH1, MSH2 and more rarely MSH6, PMS2, MLH3 genes. Whereas the absence of MSH2 protein is predictive of Lynch syndrome, it is not the case for the absence of MLH1 protein. The purpose of this study was to develop a sensitive and cost effective algorithm to select Lynch syndrome cases among patients with MLH1 immunohistochemical silencing. Eleven sporadic CRC and 16 Lynch syndrome cases with MLH1 protein abnormalities were selected. The BRAF c.1799T> A mutation (p.Val600Glu) was analyzed by direct sequencing after PCR amplification of exon 15. Methylation of MLH1 promoter was determined by Methylation-Sensitive Single-Strand Conformation Analysis. In patients with Lynch syndrome, there was no BRAF mutation and only one case showed MLH1 methylation (6%). In sporadic CRC, all cases were MLH1 methylated (100%) and 8 out of 11 cases carried the above BRAF mutation (73%) whereas only 3 cases were BRAF wild type (27%). We propose the following algorithm: (1) no further molecular analysis should be performed for CRC exhibiting MLH1 methylation and BRAF mutation, and these cases should be considered as sporadic CRC; (2) CRC with unmethylated MLH1 and negative for BRAF mutation should be considered as Lynch syndrome; and (3) only a small fraction of CRC with MLH1 promoter methylation but negative for BRAF mutation should be true Lynch syndrome patients. These potentially Lynch syndrome patients should be offered genetic counselling before searching for MLH1 gene mutations.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">SERPINB5</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">AKAP12</Emphasis>-- Expression and promoter methylation of metastasis suppressor genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background  

Early metastasis and infiltration are survival limiting characteristics of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Thus, PDAC is likely to harbor alterations in metastasis suppressor genes that may provide novel diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities. This study investigates a panel of metastasis suppressor genes in correlation to PDAC phenotype and examines promoter methylation for regulatory influence on metastasis suppressor gene expression and for its potential as a diagnostic tool.     

Dabrafenib plus Trametinib: a Review in Advanced Melanoma with a <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRAF</Emphasis><Superscript><Emphasis Type="Italic">V600</Emphasis></Superscript> Mutation

The BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (Tafinlar^®) and the MEK inhibitor trametinib (Mekinist^®) are indicated, as monotherapy or in combination with each other, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF ^V600 mutation. This article reviews the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of combination treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib in this indication and summarizes relevant pharmacological data. Dabrafenib plus trametinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), improved objective response rates (ORRs) and preserved health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) to a greater extent than dabrafenib (in the double-blind COMBI-d study) and vemurafenib (in the open-label COMBI-v study) in two large, randomized, phase III studies in treatment-naïve patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF ^V600E/K mutation. Limited treatment benefit with the combination was also seen in patients who had progressed on prior BRAF inhibitor therapy, as indicated by ORRs of ≤ 15 % and stable disease in ≤ 50 % of patients in small phase I and II studies. Combination therapy did not increase overall toxicity relative to dabrafenib or vemurafenib monotherapy, with most adverse events (AEs) mild or moderate in severity and generally manageable. Fewer skin-related AEs (e.g. cutaneous malignancies, hyperkeratinosis and hand-foot syndrome) were reported with combination therapy than with dabrafenib or vemurafenib, probably because of reduced paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway. Thus, dabrafenib plus trametinib provides an important treatment option for patients with BRAF ^V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

Open image in new window

     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Abstracts</Emphasis>

Summary Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression correlates with both loss of estrogen receptor (ER) and poor prognosis in breast cancer. Interestingly, in normal breast EGFR appears to be expressed more frequently than in malignant tissue, and there may be a different relationship between ER and EGFR. A variety of cellular regulators, such as EGF, TGF, phorbol esters, and steroid hormones, are capable of altering the level of EGFR expression in breast cells. However, much work remains to be done on the mechanistic details of EGFR regulation in this disease. The significance of EGFR as an oncogene in breast cancer is compounded by its potential interactions with other oncogenes such as c-erbB-2 and c-myc. Additionally, several recent studies have placed EGFR prominently in the signal transduction pathway, demonstrating that the EGFR-ligand system may play important roles throughout the course of malignant progression in breast cancer.     

Correlation between O<Superscript>6</Superscript>-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and survival in elderly patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide

Epigenetic silencing of the O⁶-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene by promoter methylation is correlated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who receive alkylating agents. The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between MGMT and survival in elderly patients with GBM treated with radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). Eighty-three patients aged 70 years or older with histologically confirmed GBM treated with RT plus TMZ between February 2005 and September 2009 were investigated in this study. The methylation status of the MGMT promoter was determined by polymerase chain reaction analysis. Median PFS and OS were 7.5 and 12.8 months, respectively. The MGMT promoter was methylated in 42 patients (50.6%) and unmethylated in 41 patients (49.4%). Median OS was 15.3 months in methylated patients and 10.2 months in unmethylated patients (P = 0.0001). Median PFS was 10.5 months in methylated tumors and 5.5 months in unmethylated tumors (P = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis MGMT methylation status emerged as the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS (P = 0.004 and P = 0.005, respectively). The results of the present study suggest that MGMT methylation status might be an important prognostic factor associated with better OS and PFS in elderly patients with GBM treated with RT and TMZ.     

Prognostic significance of co-overexpression of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">EGFR</Emphasis>/<Emphasis Type="Italic">IGFBP-2</Emphasis>/<Emphasis Type="Italic">HIF-2A</Emphasis> genes in astrocytomas

Overexpression of the EGFR, IGFBP-2 and HIF-2A genes has been observed in high-grade astrocytomas and these genes seem to be functionally related to one another. This study aimed to define the profile of their expressions, interactions and correlation with clinical features and prognostic significance in microdissected tumor samples from 84 patients with astrocytomas of different grades and from 6 white matter non-neoplasic brain tissue sample. EGFR, IGFBP-2 and HIF-2A gene expression levels were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR and differed significantly between grades I–IV astrocytic tumors (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001 and P: 0.0013, respectively) when analyzed by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Grade I astrocytomas presented gene expression levels similar to those encountered in samples of microdissected white matter of non-neoplastic brain tissue Overexpression of the EGFR, IGFBP-2 and HIF-2A genes was significantly associated with lower 2-year survival (P: 0.009, P: 0.0002 and P: 0.008, respectively). Co-overexpression of these genes was strongly associated with high-grade gliomas and lower survival in univariate (P < 0.0001) and multivariate (P: 0.009) analysis, suggesting that the co-expression of the EGFR/IGFBP-2/HIF-2A pathway genes may have a more important clinical and biological impact than the expression of each individual gene alone. These data support the existence of a common pathway involving these genes that could contribute to the design of new target treatments.     

Genetic variants of <Emphasis Type="Italic">CYP3A5</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">CYP2D6</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">SULT1A1</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">UGT2B15</Emphasis> and tamoxifen response in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer

Introduction  

Tamoxifen therapy reduces the risk of recurrence and prolongs the survival of oestrogen-receptor-positive patients with breast cancer. Even if most patients benefit from tamoxifen, many breast tumours either fail to respond or become resistant. Because tamoxifen is extensively metabolised by polymorphic enzymes, one proposed mechanism underlying the resistance is altered metabolism. In the present study we investigated the prognostic and/or predictive value of functional polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 3A5 CYP3A5 (*3), CYP2D6 (*4), sulphotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1; *2) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 (UGT2B15; *2) in tamoxifen-treated patients with breast cancer.     

A comprehensive analysis of common genetic variation in <Emphasis Type="Italic">MUC1</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">MUC5AC</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">MUC6</Emphasis> genes and risk of stomach cancer

Objective  

MUC1, MUC5AC, and MUC6 are main constituents of the mucus barrier in the stomach, which protects the underlying epithelium from acid, proteases, mechanical trauma, and pathogenic microorganisms. Accumulating evidence implicates potential roles of MUC1, MUC5AC, and MUC6 genetic variation in the development of stomach cancer.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">PALB2</Emphasis> analysis in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA2</Emphasis>-like families

BRCA2 and PALB2 function together in the Fanconi anemia (FA)–Breast Cancer (BRCA) pathway. Mono-allelic and bi-allelic BRCA2 and PALB2 mutation carriers share many clinical characteristics. Mono-allelic germline mutations of BRCA2 and PALB2 are risk alleles of female breast cancer and have also been reported in familial pancreatic cancer, and bi-allelic mutations cause a severe form of Fanconi anemia. In view of these similarities, we investigated whether the prevalence of PALB2 mutations was increased in breast cancer families with the occurrence of BRCA2 associated tumours other than female breast cancer. PALB2 mutation analysis was performed in 110 non-BRCA1/2 cancer patients: (a) 53 ovarian cancer patients from female breast-and/or ovarian cancer families; (b) 45 breast cancer patients with a first or second degree relative with pancreatic cancer; and (c) 12 male breast cancer patients from female breast cancer families. One truncating PALB2 mutation, c.509_510delGA, resulting in p.Arg170X, was found in a male breast cancer patient. We conclude that germline mutations of PALB2 do not significantly contribute to cancer risk in non-BRCA1/2 cancer families with at least one patient with ovarian cancer, male breast cancer, and/or pancreatic cancer.     

Expression level and methylation status of three tumor suppressor genes, <Emphasis Type="Italic">DLEC1</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">ITGA9</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">MLH1</Emphasis>, in non-small cell lung cancer

Despite therapeutic advances, lung cancer remains one of the most common causes of cancer-related death in the world. There is a need to develop biomarkers of diagnostic and/or prognostic value and to translate findings in basic science research to clinical application. Tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) represent potential useful markers for disease detection, progression and treatment target. We tried to elucidate the role of three 3p21.3 TSGs: DLEC1, ITGA9 and MLH1, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed their expression pattern by qPCR in 59 NSCLC tissues and in the matched macroscopically unchanged lung tissues. Additionally, we analyzed gene promoter methylation status by methylation-specific PCR in NSCLC samples. We did not find significant correlations between gene expression and methylation. In case of DLEC1 and ITGA9, expression levels were decreased in 71–78 % of tumor samples and significantly different between tumor and normal tissues (P = 0.0001). It could point to their diagnostic value. ITGA9 could also be regarded as a diagnostic marker differentiating NSCLC subtypes, as its expression level was significantly lower in squamous cell carcinoma (P = 0.001). The simultaneous down-regulation of DLEC1 and ITGA9 was observed in 52.5 % of NSCLCs. MSPs revealed high frequencies of gene promoter methylation in NSCLCs: 84 % for DLEC1 and MLH1 and 57 % for ITGA9. Methylation indexes reflected moderate gene methylation levels: 34 % for ITGA9, 27 % for MLH1 and 26 % for DLEC1. However, frequent simultaneous methylation of the studied genes in more than 50 % of NSCLCs suggests the possibility of consider them as a panel of epigenetic markers.     

Mutations of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">SDHB</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">SDHD</Emphasis> genes

The succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) is a mitochondrial enzyme complex with an important role in oxydative phosphorylation and intracellular oxygene sensing and signaling. Mutations in the SDHB (1p35–36) and SDHD subunits (11q23) give rise to the paraganglioma syndromes (PGL), namely PGL 4 and PGL 1, and generate paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. For both genes mutations have been described that result in a loss of function of the gene products. SDHBmutations were found in five of eight exons and in two introns, SDHD mutations in all four exons and one intron. Phenotypes and rate of malignancy of SDHB and SDHD seem to be different, with a higher frequency of head-and-neck tumors in SDHD and indications of a higher risk of malignancy in SDHB mutations. As routine diagnostic procedure all SDH mutation carriers should have urine catecholamine analysis as well as pelvic, abdominal, thoracic and skull/neck MRI.     

Genetic variation in <Emphasis Type="Italic">IGF1</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">IGFBP3</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">IRS1</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">IRS2</Emphasis> and risk of breast cancer in women living in Southwestern United States

Background An insulin-related pathway to breast cancer has been hypothesized. Methods We examine the 19 CA repeat of the IGF1 gene, the -202 C > A IGFBP3, the G972R IRS, and the G1057D IRS2 polymorphisms among 1,175 non-Hispanic white (NHW) and 576 Hispanic newly diagnosed breast cancer cases and 1,330 NHW and 727 Hispanic controls living in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah. Results Among post-menopausal women not recently exposed to hormones, not having the 19 CA repeat of IGF1 gene was associated with breast cancer among NHW women [odds ratio (OR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–3.79] and having an R allele of G972R IRS1 increased breast cancer risk among Hispanic women (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.13–6.46). Among post-menopausal Hispanic women recently exposed to hormones the A allele of the -202 C > A IGFBP3 polymorphism increased risk of breast cancer (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.06–2.33). The IGF1 19 CA repeat polymorphism interacted with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among NHW post-menopausal women; women who had the 19/19 IGF1 genotype were at reduced risk of breast cancer (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47–0.88) if they did not use HRT. We also observed interaction between body mass index and IGF1 19 CA repeat (p=0.06) and between weight gain and the -202 C > A IGFBP3 polymorphism (p=0.05) in NHW post-menopausal women not recently exposed to hormones. Conclusions Our data suggest that associations between insulin-related genes and breast cancer risk among women living in the Southwestern United States may be dependent on estrogen exposure and may differ by ethnicity.