Current early results of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic pulmonary embolism

Some patients with chronic pulmonary embolism causing severely symptomatic pulmonary hypertension have been managed by heart-lung transplantation with an associated hospital mortality of 24%. To allow comparison with pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE), we have reviewed the hospital morbidity and mortality in 149 consecutive patients. From 1 October 1984 to 18 September 1989, these patients underwent PTE utilizing a standardized procedure consisting of median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest for bilateral PTE in 91% (136/149) of the procedures with 7.4% (11/149) and 1.3% (2/149) undergoing right or left PTE, respectively. Ventilator dependency (greater than or equal to 5 days on respirator) occurred in 28.3% (41/146). Hospital mortality (death within 30 days or in hospital) was 11.4% (17/149). The most common causes of death were respiratory and multiorgan failure, 10 (59% of deaths) and acute pulmonary hemorrhage, 3 (17% of deaths). We conclude that PTE with an operative mortality of half that of heart-lung transplantation (11.4% vs. 24%) should be the procedure of choice for significantly symptomatic chronic pulmonary embolism. Furthermore, the hazards of immunosuppression and chronic graft rejection are avoided.     

Modifications of techniques and early results of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic pulmonary embolism

In 1980 we described bilateral pulmonary thromboendarterectomy with median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, deep hypothermia, and circulatory arrest for the relief of pulmonary hypertension caused by chronic pulmonary embolism. In our subsequent experience, which totals 41 patients, we have identified three groups of patients characterized by differences of intraoperative management. In Group A (N = 16) myocardial protection consisted of single-dose crystalloid cardioplegia followed by pericardial irrigation with cold saline. Extrapericardial dissection of the pulmonary arteries was performed. Group B (N = 7) was treated the same as Group A except for the substitution of saline slush contained in a laparotomy pad for iced saline. In Group C (N = 18) myocardial protection was single-dose blood cardioplegia followed by the application of a specially designed cooling jacket to the right and left ventricles. Another modification was that of intrapericardial dissection of the pulmonary arteries with extension of the dissection into the hilar tissues without entrance into the pleural spaces. The hospital mortalities of Groups A, B, and C were 18.7%, 14.3%, and 5.5%, respectively (not statistically significant differences). However, other statistically significant differences (p less than 0.05) among the groups were observed: Phrenic nerve paresis occurred in five of seven (71%) Group B patients but in no Group A or C patients; Group B patients required ventilatory support for 32.2 days compared with 8.4 days for Group A and 6.2 days for Group C; time in the intensive care unit was 36 days for Group B patients versus 13 for Group A and 10.3 for Group C; pulmonary vascular resistance decreased 59% (649 versus 259) intraoperatively in 13 patients in Group C. We believe simultaneous bilateral pulmonary thromboendarterectomy with median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, deep hypothermia with circulatory arrest, and the modified methods of myocardial preservation and dissection represent current optimal surgical management of this problem.     

Current status of pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis prophylaxis

Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is an area that has received intense study in certain conditions, but less than adequate coverage in other areas. In considering who needs prophylaxis, patients are categorized into levels of risk. Clinical venous thromboembolism can be correlated to these levels of risk. Methods of prophylaxis include pharmacologic, mechanical, and combinations of these. Each category of surgical and medical patient requires specific types of prophylaxis. In certain orthopedic indications, the length of prophylaxis outlasts the inpatient hospital stay and may be as long as 1 month after discharge. Even with the best prophylaxis today, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is decreased by only approximately 70% to 80%. Further developments should allow for greater declines in the rates of venous thromboembolism, with its subsequent short-term consequence of pulmonary embolism and lower extremity morbidity and long-term consequence of the disabling syndrome of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).     

Current diagnostic techniques in the evaluation of bone architecture

Bone quality, which encompasses trabecular bone and cortical bone architecture, bone mineralization, turnover, and microdamage, is an essential component of bone strength. Therefore, bone quality, bone density, and total content are the most important parameters in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Noninvasive assessment of bone quality has recently received considerable attention because bone density alone is not a surrogate for fracture prevalence and occurrence, and does not completely explain the therapeutic efficacy of emerging treatments. This paper will focus on the noninvasive assessment of trabecular bone architecture, one of the factors that governs bone strength and may be categorized as a contributor to bone quality. The methodologies described will include magnetic resonance imaging, clinical multislice spiral computed tomography, and micro-computed tomography, along with computerized analysis of radiographic patterns of trabecular bone.     

Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism

Venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cardiovascular disease and a leading cause of death in the US. There are many risk factors related to PE. Traditional treatments are anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis, and surgical thrombectomy. More recently, several minimally invasive procedures were introduced, which includes catheter-directed thrombolysis, percutaneous embolectomy, embolus fragmentation techniques, pulmonary artery stent placement or association of two or more of those techniques. In the present study the Authors review the role of the different techniques for the treatment of PE, and provide some guidelines and indications for treatment. The most popular devices and techniques are described in detail, and the efficacy of the techniques is discussed.     

Prophylactic strategies for perioperative pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND: Incidence of perioperative pulmonary embolism (PE) has increased in Japan probably due to the modernized life style. As the mortality rate of PE is very high, its prophylaxis is important. Therefore, prophylactic strategies for PE were instituted in the entire hospital. METHODS: Elastic stockings (ES) for preventing perioperative deep vein thrombosis in lower extremities were worn from the morning of the operation until the beginning of ambulation. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) apparatuses were used in combination with ES. IPC apparatus was employed right after induction of anesthesia until leaving postanesthetic care unit (PACU). Seventy percent of patients stayed in PACU until the morning after the operation and the other patients for a few hours after the end of surgery. RESULTS: We managed 4,200 patients with this method. We experienced one symptomatic deep vein thrombosis but not severe or moderately severe PE. However, it is difficult to evaluate the incidence of mild PE because it is usual that symptom such as chest discomfort is thought as an indefinite complaint and its cause is not investigated further. CONCLUSIONS: Our preventive strategies seem to be useful to decrease the incidence and severity of perioperative PE.     

Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism.

Consensus regarding the use of thrombolysis to treat acute pulmonary embolism has not yet been reached. There is good evidence that thrombolytic agents dissolve clot more rapidly than heparin. However, proving that this benefit reduces the death rate from pulmonary embolism has been difficult. Each of the 3 thrombolytic agents (tissue type-plasminogen activator, streptokinase and urokinase) is equally efficacious at dissolving clot, but all are associated with an increased risk of major hemorrhage when compared with heparin. One evolving position is that, in addition to patients presenting in circulatory collapse, for whom thrombolysis has been demonstrated to be life-saving, a subgroup of patients may be identified by echocardiography, through its ability to assess right ventricular dysfunction, who should also be considered for thrombolytic therapy. It remains to be seen whether this approach can reduce the death rate associated with pulmonary embolism.     

Monitoring for suspected pulmonary embolism.

It is fortunate that serious embolic phenomena are uncommon because, with the exception of neurosurgery in the sitting position and cardiac surgery, thoracic echocardiography and the precordial Doppler device, the most sensitive indicators of embolism, are seldom used. Vigilance is required of the anesthesiologist to recognize the rapid fall in end-tidal PCO2, the usual first indicator of a clinically significant PE. Any sudden deterioration in the patient's vital signs should include embolism in the differential diagnosis, particularly during procedures that carry a high risk of the complication.