D2-dopamine receptor occupancy differs between patients with and without extrapyramidal side effects

To investigate whether the occurrence of extrapyramidal side effects was related to D2 dopamine receptor occupancy, iodobenzamide single positron emission computed tomography was carried out in 27 schizophrenic patients and 10 controls. Eighteen patients were treated with haloperidol; 9 patients were treated with clozapine. Our data suggest a relationship between D2 receptor occupancy and extrapyramidal side effects as well as the existence of a neuroleptic threshold of a striatal:frontal cortex ratio of 1.2, below which drug-induced exptrapyramidal side effects can be expected.     

Relationship between dopamine D(2) occupancy, clinical response, and side effects: a double-blind PET study of first-episode schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: Since all antipsychotics block dopamine D(2) receptors, the authors investigated how well D(2) receptor occupancy in vivo predicts clinical response, extrapyramidal side effects, and hyperprolactinemia. METHOD: In a double-blind study, 22 patients with first-episode schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 1.0 or 2. 5 mg/day of haloperidol. After 2 weeks of treatment, D(2) receptor occupancy was determined with [(11)C]raclopride and positron emission tomography, and clinical response, extrapyramidal side effects, and prolactin levels were measured. Patients who showed adequate responses continued taking their initial doses, those who did not respond had their doses increased to 5.0 mg/day, and evaluations were repeated at 4 weeks for all patients. RESULTS: The patients showed a wide range of D(2) occupancy (38%-87%). The degree of receptor occupancy predicted clinical improvement, hyperprolactinemia, and extrapyramidal side effects. The likelihood of clinical response, hyperprolactinemia, and extrapyramidal side effects increased significantly as D(2) occupancy exceeded 65%, 72%, and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that D(2) occupancy is an important mediator of response and side effects in antipsychotic treatment. The data are consistent with a "target and trigger" hypothesis of antipsychotic action, i.e., that the D(2) receptor specificity of antipsychotics permits them to target discrete neurons and that their antagonist properties trigger within those neurons intracellular changes that ultimately beget antipsychotic response. While limited to haloperidol, the relationship between D(2) occupancy and side effects in this study helps explain many of the observed clinical differences between typical and atypical antipsychotics.     

Positron emission tomographic analysis of central D1 and D2 dopamine receptor occupancy in patients treated with classical neuroleptics and clozapine. Relation to extrapyramidal side effects.

Positron emission tomography and selective radioligands were used to determine D1 and D2 dopamine receptor occupancy induced by neuroleptics in the basal ganglia of drug-treated schizophrenic patients. In 22 patients treated with conventional dosages of classical neuroleptics, the D2 occupancy was 70% to 89%. Patients with acute extrapyramidal syndromes had a higher D2 occupancy than those without side effects. This finding indicates that neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal syndromes are related to the degree of central D2 occupancy induced in the basal ganglia. In five patients treated with clozapine, the prototype atypical antipsychotic drug, a lower D2 occupancy of 38% to 63% was found. This finding demonstrates that clozapine is also "atypical" with respect to the central D2 occupancy in patients. During treatment with clozapine, there is a low frequency of extrapyramidal syndromes, which accordingly may reflect the comparatively low D2 occupancy induced by clinical doses of clozapine. Classical neuroleptics, like haloperidol or sulpiride, did not cause any evident D1 occupancy, but the thioxanthene flupentixol induced a 36% to 44% occupancy. In four patients treated with clozapine, the D1 occupancy was 38% to 52%. The D1 occupancy induced by clozapine and flupentixol may contribute to the antipsychotic effect of these drugs.     

Increasing D2 affinity results in the loss of clozapine's atypical antipsychotic action

Typical antipsychotics (haloperidol) give rise to severe motor side-effects while atypical antipsychotics like clozapine do not. Action at several neurotransmitter receptors have been implicated. To identify the critical mechanisms involved we synthesized an 8-C1 isomer of clozapine which showed an equivalent affinity to clozapine on multiple receptors (5-HT1A, 5-HT2, D1, D4, M1) but differed in having a 10-fold higher affinity at the dopamine D2/3 receptor. When tested in a series of animal models indicative of the typical/atypical distinction (catalepsy, striatal gene-induction, prolactin elevation) isoclozapine lost atypical properties and behaved like a typical antipsychotic. Simultaneous in vivo receptor occupancy studies confirmed that alterations in D2 receptor occupancy were most closely related to loss of atypicality by clozapine's isomer isoclozapine. The implications for the design of future antipsychotics is discussed.     

Prolactin levels in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder patients treated with clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol

BACKGROUND: Prolactin levels are elevated to varying degrees by antipsychotics. Prolactin elevations may result in sexual and other adverse effects, and they may be related to antipsychotic effects. We used the data collected in a trial of antipsychotics to study the differential effect of these drugs on prolactin level, to explore the relation between clinical effects and prolactin level, and to determine the relationship between plasma levels of antipsychotics and prolactin level. METHOD: Treatment-resistant patients (133 men, 24 women) diagnosed with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder participated in a double-blind, randomized, 14-week trial comparing clozapine (N = 40), olanzapine (N = 39), risperidone (N = 41), and haloperidol (N = 37). Plasma levels of prolactin and antipsychotics were determined at baseline and at weeks 5, 8, 10, 12, and 14 during the trial. Clinical effects were measured with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. Statistical analyses were limited to the 75 men for whom repeated prolactin levels were available. Data were gathered from June 1996 to December 1999. RESULTS: Risperidone caused significant elevation of prolactin levels (p <.05) that appeared to be dose-dependent. Clozapine and olanzapine were associated with decreases of prolactin, whereas haloperidol led to a minor, nonsignificant increase. Plasma olanzapine and prolactin levels were correlated. Prolactin levels were not related to clinical improvement or extrapyramidal side effects. CONCLUSION: Antipsychotics show major differences in their effects on prolactin, and risperidone has clearly the most robust effect.     

The effect of chronic treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotics on working memory and jaw movements in three- and eighteen-month-old rats

The effects of chronic treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotics on acquisition, working memory, motor activity, and rat tardive dyskinesia (TD) were studied in 3- and 18-month-old Sprague-Dawley rats. Acquisition and working memory were studied in eight-arm radial mazes. TD liability of antipsychotic drugs (APD) was evaluated in rat model of TD in which spontaneous repetitive jaw movements (RJM) occur during withdrawal from neuroleptic treatment. Motor behavior was assessed using the traverse beam test. D1 and D2 receptor occupancy was determined in the rat brain during treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotics. Chronic administration of clozapine, haloperidol, and risperidone impaired acquisition of the eight-arm radial maze in both young and aging rats while olanzapine had no effect. Retention tests showed that aging rats made more errors than the adults and that the antipsychotics haloperidol and risperidone significantly impaired retention in both age groups. Evaluation of motor behavior revealed that typical and atypical antipsychotics used in comparable doses in young rats had no effect on motor behavior, whereas in aging rats performance was impaired by clozapine, haloperidol, and risperidone but not by olanzapine. RJM responses were increased during washout from haloperidol treatment in young and aging rats whereas olanzapine, clozapine, and risperidone had no effect. D2 receptor occupancy in haloperidol- and risperidone-treated rats was above 70% while olanzapine and clozapine receptor occupancy was below 70%, which is the threshold for the appearance of extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) and TD.     

A positron emission tomography study of quetiapine in schizophrenia: a preliminary finding of an antipsychotic effect with only transiently high dopamine D2 receptor occupancy

BACKGROUND: Quetiapine is a new atypical antipsychotic medication. As such, relatively little has been published regarding its in vivo effects at the dopamine type 2 (D2) and serotonin type 2a (5-HT2a) receptor systems. The following study was undertaken to explore these effects across the clinical dose range and relate this information to its clinical profile. METHODS: Twelve patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to doses of 150 to 600 mg/d (n=3, at 150, 300, 450, and 600 mg/d) of quetiapine. After 3 weeks of treatment, D2 and 5-HT2a occupancy were measured using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, 12 to 14 hours after the last dose. Clinical efficacy and adverse effect ratings were obtained at baseline, at the time of PET scanning, and at 12 weeks. Two additional patients were included to examine the effects of the drug 2 to 3 hours after last dose. RESULTS: Quetiapine was an effective antipsychotic and improved the extrapyramidal symptoms and prolactin level elevation noted at baseline. It achieved these results with minimal (0%-27%) D2 occupancy 12 hours after the last dose. Study of the additional subjects revealed that quetiapine does give rise to transiently high (58%-64%) D2 occupancy 2 to 3 hours after a single dose that then decreases to minimal levels in 12 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine shows a transiently high D2 occupancy, which decreases to very low levels by the end of the dosing interval. Quetiapine's low D2 occupancy can explain its freedom from extrapyramidal symptoms and prolactin level elevation. The data suggest that transient D2 occupancy may be sufficient for its antipsychotic effect. Future studies controlling for nonpharmacological effects as well as activities on other receptors will be necessary to confirm this suggestion.     

No support for regional selectivity in clozapine-treated patients: a PET study with [(11)C]raclopride and [(11)C]FLB 457

OBJECTIVE: The authors' goal was to test the hypothesis of extrastriatal D(2) receptor selectivity as the mechanism of action of clozapine. METHOD: Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to examine extrastriatal as well as striatal dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy in four patients treated with clozapine and three patients treated with haloperidol. The reference radioligand [(11)C]raclopride was used for determination of D(2) receptor occupancy in the striatum. The radioligand [(11)C]FLB 457 was chosen for determination of D(2) receptor occupancy in the thalamus, the temporal cortex, and the frontal cortex. RESULTS: In patients treated with haloperidol the D(2) receptor occupancy was high in all examined brain regions. In clozapine-treated patients the D(2) receptor occupancy was relatively low in both the striatum and the extrastriatal regions. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present study give no support for the hypothesis of regional selectivity as the mechanism of action for clozapine.     

Typical and atypical antipsychotic occupancy of D2 and S2 receptors: An autoradiographic analysis in rat brain

In thin sections of rat brain, [3H]spiperone binds to D2 sites in the basal ganglia (caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, olfactory tubercle) and S2 sites in the claustrum and motor cortex. The in vitro displacement of [3H]spiperone from these regions was quantified autoradiographically with the "atypical" neuroleptics clozapine and thioridazine, which ameliorate psychosis, a "typical" neuroleptic, haloperidol, which also induces extrapyramidal side effects, or with metoclopramide, which induces extrapyramidal side effects but is an ineffective antipsychotic. Whereas metoclopramide was equipotent at D2 sites, haloperidol was less potent and clozapine and thioridazine more potent by 2- to 3-fold at competing for D2 sites in the nucleus accumbens or olfactory tubercle than in the caudate-putamen. As measured autoradiographically or with tissue homogenates, clozapine, thioridazine, and five other atypical neuroleptics were 4- to 800-times more potent at competing for S2 sites in the frontal cortex than for D2 sites in the basal ganglia. A preference of atypical antipsychotics for D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens and olfactory tubercle and for the S2 receptor may explain the relative lack of extrapyramidal side effects produced by these compounds.     

Efficacy and tolerability of second-generation antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia

Early-onset schizophrenia-spectrum (EOSS) disorders (onset of psychotic symptoms before 18 years of age) represent a severe variant associated with significant chronic functional impairment and poor response to antipsychotic treatment. All drugs with proven antipsychotic effects block dopamine D(2) receptors to some degree. The ongoing development of the dopamine and other neurotransmitter receptor systems during childhood and adolescence may affect clinical response and susceptibility to side effects in youth. A literature search was conducted of clinical trials of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with EOSS disorders between 1980 and 2007 from the Medline database, reference lists, and conference proceedings. Trials were limited to double-blind studies of duration of 4 or more weeks that included 15 or more patients. Ten clinical trials were identified. Antipsychotic medications were consistently found to reduce the severity of psychotic symptoms in children and adolescents when compared with placebo. The superiority of clozapine has been now demonstrated relative to haloperidol, standard-dose olanzapine, and "high-dose" olanzapine for EOSS disorders. However, limited comparative data are available regarding whether there are differences among the remaining second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in clinical effectiveness. The available data from short-term studies suggest that youth might be more sensitive than adults to developing antipsychotic-related adverse side effects (eg, extrapyramidal side effects, sedation, prolactin elevation, weight gain). In addition, preliminary data suggest that SGA use can lead to the development of diabetes in some youth, a disease which itself carries with it significant morbidity and mortality. Such a substantial risk points to the urgent need to develop therapeutic strategies to prevent and/or mitigate weight gain and diabetes early in the course of treatment in this population.     

Subjective experience and D2 receptor occupancy in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia treated with low-dose olanzapine or haloperidol: a randomized,double-blind study

OBJECTIVE: The authors tested the hypothesis that a dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy level between 60% and 70% in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia would result in optimal subjective experience. In addition, they sought preliminary evidence on whether subjective experience is better with low-dose olanzapine than with low-dose haloperidol. METHOD: Subjects (N=24) who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with either olanzapine, 7.5 mg/day, or haloperidol, 2.5 mg/day. Subjective experience, psychopathology, and extrapyramidal symptoms were assessed at baseline and at endpoint. After 6 weeks, D(2) receptor occupancy was assessed with [(123)I]iodobenzamide single photon emission computed tomography. RESULTS: The two study groups were similar at baseline. After 6 weeks, patients receiving olanzapine had a significantly lower mean dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy (51.0%, range=36%-67%) than those given haloperidol (65.5%, range=45%-75%). Receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% was associated with optimal subjective experience, and subjective experience improved significantly in the haloperidol group. CONCLUSIONS: A level of D(2) receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% is optimal for subjective experience of patients with recent-onset schizophrenia. Substantial interindividual variation in D(2) receptor occupancy was seen at fixed low-dose levels of olanzapine and haloperidol. Olanzapine, 7.5 mg/day, showed no superior subjective response over haloperidol, 2.5 mg/day. Olanzapine may need to be dosed higher than 7.5 mg/day for most patients with recent-onset schizophrenia, and haloperidol needs to be individually titrated in the very low dose range to reach optimal occupancy.     

Suggested minimal effective dose of risperidone based on PET-measured D2 and 5-HT2A receptor occupancy in schizophrenic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Multicenter trials with the novel antipsychotic risperidone have suggested a standard dose of 6 mg/day. However, a dose producing the highest response rate in fixed-dose studies is likely to exceed the minimal effective dose in most patients. The aim of this positron emission tomography (PET) study was to suggest a minimal effective dose of risperidone based on measurements of dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor occupancy. METHOD: Eight first-episode or drug-free schizophrenic patients were treated with risperidone, 6 mg/day, for 4 weeks and then 3 mg/day for 2 weeks. PET was performed after 4 and 6 weeks, with [11C]raclopride to measure D2 receptor occupancy and [11C]N-methylspiperone to measure 5-HT2A receptor occupancy. RESULTS: Seven patients completed the study and responded to treatment with risperidone. No patient had extrapyramidal side effects at the time of inclusion in the study. At the 6-mg/day dose, mean D2 receptor occupancy was 82% (range = 79%-85%), 5-HT2A receptor occupancy was 95% (range = 86%-109%), and six patients had developed extrapyramidal side effects. After dose reduction to 3 mg/day, D2 receptor occupancy was 72% (range = 53%-78%), and 5-HT2A receptor occupancy was 83% (range = 65%-112%). Three patients had extrapyramidal side effects at this time. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with risperidone, 6 mg/day, is likely to induce unnecessarily high D2 receptor occupancy, with a consequent risk of extrapyramidal side effects. High 5-HT2A receptor occupancy did not prevent extrapyramidal side effects completely. The authors previously suggested an optimal interval for D2 receptor occupancy of 70%-80%. To achieve this, resperidone, 4 mg/day, should be a suitable initial dose for antipsychotic effect with a minimal risk of extrapyramidal side effects in most patients.     

Prediction and assessment of extrapyramidal side effects induced by risperidone based on dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy

In the present study, we attempted to predict the risk of extrapyramidal side effects of a selective monoaminergic antagonist, risperidone, by analyzing the correlation between the dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy and the degree of extrapyramidal side effects of the drug. The occupancies of D(2) and 5-HT(2) receptors at various doses of risperidone were calculated by means of a receptor occupancy theory. The extrapyramidal side effects after administration of risperidone were attempted to predict by theoretical analysis of the correlation between the calculated occupancies and the evidence of extrapyramidal symptoms using a ternary complex model. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis utilized the data concerning the pharmacokinetics of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone (active metabolite), their binding affinities with D(2) and 5-HT(2) receptors, and the clinical evidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale: ESRS), gathered from the literature. The mean occupancy of 5-HT(2) receptors after the administration of regular doses of risperidone was suggested to be more than 90%, whereas the mean occupancy of D(2) receptors varied between 50-80%, depending on the dose. The correlation between the occupancy of D(2) receptors and the extrapyramidal symptoms could be successfully analyzed with a ternary complex model, showing the predictability of the model for the extrapyramidal side effects of risperidone. Since the estimated risk of the extrapyramidal side effects varied with the dose, the present method of predicting the extrapyramidal side effects of risperidone may provide a basis for developing a rational dosing regimen for the drug.     

In vivo determination of striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in patients treated with olanzapine.

In vivo studies of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy with atypical antipsychotics have suggested good clinical efficacy at occupancy rates less than those observed with typical neuroleptics, and few extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), possibly even at high levels of D2 occupancy. We used [123I]IBZM-SPECT to investigate striatal D2 receptor occupancy in 10 schizophrenic patients who were treated with both a low (5 mg) and a high dose (20 mg) of the novel antipsychotic olanzapine without concomitant medications. The mean D2 occupancy at 5 mg was 59.8% (range 33-81%); the mean D2 occupancy at 20 mg was 82.8% (range 56-97%). Although the D2 occupancy rates on 5 and 20 mg olanzapine were significantly different (P < 0.001), there were no significant differences in clinical ratings for psychiatric symptoms or extrapyramidal side effects between the two doses of olanzapine. These data suggest that: (1) olanzapine doses below those used routinely occupy D2 receptors at levels approaching those associated with therapeutic response; (2) higher doses produce relatively high levels of D2 occupancy rates; and (3) EPS are mild even at relatively high levels of D2 occupancy.     

Dopamine D(2) receptors and their role in atypical antipsychotic action: still necessary and may even be sufficient.

"Atypical" antipsychotics are associated with a much lower propensity for extrapyramidal side effects and, with some exceptions, a lack of sustained prolactin elevation. The authors propose that a low-affinity and fast dissociation (in molecular terms) from the dopamine D(2) receptor, along with administration of the drug in doses that lead to appropriate levels of dopamine D(2) receptor blockade, are the most important requirements for atypicality. Actions at other receptors (5-HT(2), D(4), etc.) may not be necessary to achieve atypicality, and while action at these receptors may have benefits on symptoms such as mood and cognition, this is as yet to be conclusively proven. Why clozapine is effective in refractory patients is still elusive and efforts to make antipsychotics that are devoid of effects on the dopamine D(2) receptors so far have been unsuccessful. In light of this, the authors provide a heuristic model linking pathophysiology and therapeutics and suggest that the ideal treatment for schizophrenia is unlikely to be single-drug with multireceptor blockade (a sort of one-size-fits-all polypharmacy) but will require several specific and targeted treatment strategies that are titrated to match the variable expression of different dimensions of schizophrenia in each patient.     

Atypical antipsychotics: mechanism of action.

BACKGROUND: Although the principal brain target that all antipsychotic drugs attach to is the dopamine D2 receptor, traditional or typical antipsychotics, by attaching to it, induce extrapyramidal signs and symptoms (EPS). They also, by binding to the D2 receptor, elevate serum prolactin. Atypical antipsychotics given in dosages within the clinically effective range do not bring about these adverse clinical effects. To understand how these drugs work, it is important to examine the atypical antipsychotics' mechanism of action and how it differs from that of the more typical drugs. METHOD: This review analyzes the affinities, the occupancies, and the dissociation time-course of various antipsychotics at dopamine D2 receptors and at serotonin (5-HT) receptors, both in the test tube and in live patients. RESULTS: Of the 31 antipsychotics examined, the older traditional antipsychotics such as trifluperazine, pimozide, chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, and flupenthixol bind more tightly than dopamine itself to the dopamine D2 receptor, with dissociation constants that are lower than that for dopamine. The newer, atypical antipsychotics such as quetiapine, remoxipride, clozapine, olanzapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, and amisulpride all bind more loosely than dopamine to the dopamine D2 receptor and have dissociation constants higher than that for dopamine. These tight and loose binding data agree with the rates of antipsychotic dissociation from the human-cloned D2 receptor. For instance, radioactive haloperidol, chlorpromazine, and raclopride all dissociate very slowly over a 30-minute time span, while radioactive quetiapine, clozapine, remoxipride, and amisulpride dissociate rapidly, in less than 60 seconds. These data also match clinical brain-imaging findings that show haloperidol remaining constantly bound to D2 in humans undergoing 2 positron emission tomography (PET) scans 24 hours apart. Conversely, the occupation of D2 by clozapine or quetiapine has mostly disappeared after 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Atypicals clinically help patients by transiently occupying D2 receptors and then rapidly dissociating to allow normal dopamine neurotransmission. This keeps prolactin levels normal, spares cognition, and obviates EPS. One theory of atypicality is that the newer drugs block 5-HT2A receptors at the same time as they block dopamine receptors and that, somehow, this serotonin-dopamine balance confers atypicality. This, however, is not borne out by the results. While 5-HT2A receptors are readily blocked at low dosages of most atypical antipsychotic drugs (with the important exceptions of remoxipride and amisulpride, neither of which is available for use in Canada) the dosages at which this happens are below those needed to alleviate psychosis. In fact, the antipsychotic threshold occupancy of D2 for antipsychotic action remains at about 65% for both typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs, regardless of whether 5-HT2A receptors are blocked or not. At the same time, the antipsychotic threshold occupancy of D2 for eliciting EPS remains at about 80% for both typical and atypical antipsychotics, regardless of the occupancy of 5-HT2A receptors. RELEVANCE: The "fast-off-D2" theory, on the other hand, predicts which antipsychotic compounds will or will not produce EPS and hyperprolactinemia and which compounds present a relatively low risk for tardive dyskinesia. This theory also explains why L-dopa psychosis responds to low atypical antipsychotic dosages, and it suggests various individualized treatment strategies.     

Receptor occupancy and antipsychotic drug action measured by PET and SPECT]

Positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies have demonstrated consistent findings of high dopamine D2 receptor occupancy (> 65-70%) in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs. Further, the risk of extrapyramidal side effects has been shown high in patients with occupancy above 80%. On the basis of these findings, an optimal interval for D2 receptor occupancy between 70% and 80% has been suggested. It has also been shown that several atypical antipsychotics induce marked occupancy of central 5-HT2 and D2 receptors in vivo. However, a low D2 occupancy has been observed in patients with clinical dose of clozapine or quetiapine. The antipsychotic effect of these atypical drugs with a low D2 receptor occupancy has been widely discussed with respect to actions on other receptor systems, limbic selectivity of antipsychotic action and episodic transient occupancy. The recent advances in PET/SPECT and developments of new radioligands have made it possible to evaluate antipsychotic drug actions directly in humans. The empirical data from occupancy measurements will enable us to open future directions of investigation of antipsychotic action and improvement of antipsychotic treatment.     

Are animal studies of antipsychotics appropriately dosed? Lessons from the bedside to the bench.

Animal models are crucial for understanding the mechanism of action of antipsychotics. However, the dose of an antipsychotic in animal studies is often arbitrarily chosen, with haloperidol 1 mg/kg being a rather common standard. Recent clinical positron emission tomography (PET) studies in patients show all antipsychotics to block dopamine D2 receptors, and most are effective at doses that lead to 60% to 80% D2 occupancy. When occupancy exceeds 80%, the incidence of side effects rises sharply. To use this "bedside" information to inform the "bench," we measured D2 occupancy in rats using a method similar in principle to the [11C]-raclopride PET method in humans. We found that: 1) as in humans, haloperidol is effective in animal models of antipsychotic action when D2 occupancy > 70% and leads to effects in models of extrapyramidal side effects when D2 occupancy is > 80%; 2) very low doses, 0.06 mg/kg/sc, cause acute D2 occupancy of 75%; 3) and even doses that acutely saturate D2 receptors give little D2 occupancy after 24 hours due to the very short half-life of haloperidol in rats (2.5 hours versus 24 hours in humans). We conclude that most previous animal studies of antipsychotics have used doses giving rise to inappropriately high acute D2 occupancy and inappropriately low D2 occupancy between doses. We exemplify how this dosing confounder could lead to inappropriate conclusions. Data from the bedside translated to the bench--using D2 occupancy as a mediating variable--will lead to more valid animal models.     

Antipsychotic drugs,dopamine receptors,and schizophrenia

The clinical potencies of antipsychotic drugs are directly related to their affinities for the dopamine D2 receptor. In addition, the concentrations of antipsychotic drugs (given at therapeutic maintenance doses) in the plasma water or in the spinal fluid are almost identical to the antipsychotic dissociation constants at the dopamine D2 receptor. A consistent 70–75% of brain D2 receptors are occupied by antipsychotic drugs, as calculated from the therapeutic concentration and the antipsychotic dissociation constant. The D3 and D4 dopamine receptors, however, are not consistently occupied by antipsychotic drugs, the occupancies being 0–85% for D3, and 0–95% for D4. Human brain imaging also reveals that therapeutic doses of antipsychotic drugs occupy ∼70% of D2 receptors. Between 2 and 4 h after the daily oral dose, clozapine and quetiapine occupy high levels (∼70%) of the dopamine D2 receptors in schizophrenia patients, with lower occupancies at 6 and 12 h. Although clozapine and quetiapine occupy low levels of D2 receptors many hours after the oral dose, the observed fraction of D2 receptors occupied by these drugs, however, depends on the radioligand used, with high occupancy seen when using [¹¹C]raclopride, and low occupancy seen with [¹¹C]methylspiperone (which is tightly bound to D2). This dependence on the radioligand occurs because clozapine and quetiapine are loosely bound to D2. The loose binding of clozapine and quetiapine to D2 permits endogenous dopamine to displace these antipsychotic drugs much more quickly than haloperidol. In addition, the small dose of radioactive raclopride injected (in brain imaging) can displace a little of the D2-bound clozapine. Hence, the observed low level of D2 occupancy by clozapine in patients may arise from a combination of the above three factors – the ligand dependency, the endogenous dopamine, and the displacement by the imaging dose. Parkinsonism and extrapyramidal effects occur with antipsychotics which have a high affinity for D2 and which are, therefore, tightly bound to D2. Clozapine and quetiapine have a low affinity for D2, and, being readily displaced by endogenous dopamine, do not give rise to extrapyramidal effects. Because the loosely bound antipsychotics dissociate from D2 more rapidly, clinical relapse may occur earlier than that found with the tightly bound traditional antipsychotics. The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia is supported by the fact that D2 is the main target of antipsychotic action, that monomers of D2 appear elevated in schizophrenia, and that the synaptic levels of dopamine in schizophrenia are at least two-fold higher than in control subjects.     

In vivo occupation of dopamine D1, D2 and serotonin (5-HT)2A receptors by sertindole in the rat brain.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the in vivo occupation of dopamine D1, D2 and serotonin (5-HT)2A receptors by novel antipsychotic agent sertindole using N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ), an irreversible antagonist at these receptor sites. DESIGN: Animal study. INTERVENTIONS: Intraperitoneal administration to Wistar rats of 1 of 4 test compounds: a control compound of 0.15% tartaric acid, or a compound of either sertindole (0.5 mg/kg or 2.0 mg/kg) or clozapine (20 mg/kg) dissolved in 0.15% tartaric acid 1 hour before intraperitoneal administration of EEDQ (8 mg/kg) or ethanol/water solution. RESULTS: Sertindole exhibited little or no effect on D1 and D2 binding sites in vivo. On the other hand, sertindole occupied 5-HT2A receptors more extensively and firmly than EEDQ. This study indicates that sertindole is characterized by high occupancy of 5-HT2A receptors and by low or minimum occupancy of D1 and D2 receptors. CONCLUSIONS: These characteristics are very similar to atypical antipsychotic agents such as clozapine. Sertindole's low liability to cause extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) may be related to greater long-term binding for 5-HT2A receptors relative to D2 receptors.