163例腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术的护理配合体会

1997年～ 2 0 0 4年 2月份我院利用电视腹腔镜为 163例病人实施了胆囊、阑尾联合切除术 ,手术全部成功。现就术前、术中的护理配合体会报告如下 :1　临床资料本组 163例病人 ,男性 77例 ,女性 86例 ,年龄 17～ 81岁 ,平均 3 6± 7岁。术前诊断为胆囊结石、多发胆囊息肉 ,急慢性胆囊炎 112例 ,术中做胆囊切除并预防性阑尾切除术 ;急慢性阑尾炎合并有胆囊结石、胆囊息肉、胆囊炎 5 1例 ,均于术中行胆囊、阑尾联合切除术 (LC LA)。2　术前准备2 .1　心理护理 :腹腔镜手术患者的心理状态是影响手术成功的重要方面 ,针对病人的焦虑、紧张、恐…     

腹腔镜胆囊切除联合阑尾切除术30例临床经验与分析

目的 探讨急、慢诊施行腹腔镜胆囊(Laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)联合阑尾切除术(Laparoscopic appendectomy,LA)的操作要点和临床价值.方法 回顾性分析了我院2006年9月至2010年2月对30例患者施行腹腔镜胆囊联合阑尾切除术.其中,急性胆囊炎合并慢性阑尾炎1...     

腹腔镜下胆囊阑尾联合切除术11例

正随着腹腔镜手术的普及,腹腔镜下胆囊切除术(Laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)和腹腔镜下阑尾切除术(Laparoscopic appendectomy,LA)均已成为常见的手术,且具有创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短、术后并发症少等优点。我院2014年6月—2015年6月开展11例腹腔镜下胆囊和阑尾联合切除术(LC联合LA),报道如下。1资料与方法1.1一般资料阑尾炎合并结石性胆囊炎患者11例,其中男     

腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术38例应用体会

腹腔镜胆囊切除术（laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC）已是治疗慢性胆囊良性疾病的金标准。急性阑尾炎亦是外科常见急腹症。慢性胆囊良性疾病合并阑尾炎病人在临床上较多见．传统开腹手术鉴于阑尾和胆囊位置相距较远,故不同时处理。腹腔镜阑尾切除术（laparoscopic appendectomy,LA）虽比LC早报告4年,但其临床应用远不如LC普及。2006年7月至2009年5月我院共行腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术38例．均取得良好疗效,现报告如下。     

腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术的临床应用

目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术的临床疗效.方法 对1993年1月至2009年12月我院施行的121例腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术的临床资料进行回顾性分析,其中腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合手术(LC+LA)119例,LC+LA+腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗术2例,其中其中慢性结石性胆囊炎96例,急性结石性胆囊炎18例,胆囊息肉7例,合并慢性或亚急性阑尾炎110例,急性阑尾炎11例,合并肝囊肿2例.结果 121例均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹,无手术并发症,平均手术时间(55.2±30.6)min,术中出血量5～50 ml,平均(10.2±8.6)ml,术后抗生素使用时间平均3.1 d,平均住院(5.0±2.2)d.106例获得门诊或电话随访,随访率87.6%,随访时间3～130个月,平均52个月,无肠瘘、残株炎、残余脓肿、粘连性肠梗阻、切口疝等手术并发症发生.结论 腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术可同时治疗胆囊和阑尾病变以及腹腔内的其他疾病,具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少、刀口美容效果好、住院时间短、医疗费用低等优点.     

经脐单孔微型腹腔镜胆囊切除421例回顾性分析

近年来经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy,TUSPLC)成为新的研究热点[1-4].我们在熟练掌握常规多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的基础上,应用微型腹腔镜和曲线型器械[5-6],于2010年2月至2011年2月开展421例TUSPLC.现报告如下.临床资料1.一般资料:本组421例,男性117例,女性304例,年龄13～74岁,平均41.8岁.胆囊息肉65例,胆囊结石合并慢性胆囊炎329例,胆囊结石合并急性胆囊炎27例.其中胆囊颈部嵌顿结石12例,3例合并慢性阑尾炎同时行阑尾切除术.     

肥胖女性患者腹腔镜阑尾切除术53例报告

目的探讨对肥胖女性患者（BMI〉30kg/m2）施行腹腔镜阑尾切除术（laparoscopic appendetectomy,LA）的优势。方法采用三孔法LA治疗肥胖女性患者阑尾炎53例。合并胆囊结石4例,不增加切口一并行腹腔镜胆囊切除术;合并卵巢囊肿2例,不增加切口一并行腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术;合并输卵管积脓输卵管炎4例,予以排脓冲洗。结果53例均于腹腔镜下顺利完成阑尾切除术,无中转开腹。手术时间25~65min,平均42min。53例随访1~36个月,平均12个月,均未发生并发症。结论肥胖女性患者行LA具有安全、微创、并发症少、恢复快的优点,值得临床进一步推广。     

腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术的临床应用

<正>近年来,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)以及腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)在各级医院普及开展,在2002年1月到2009年5月间,我院对于胆囊结石(息肉)胆囊炎、合并阑尾病变者采用腔镜下胆囊阑尾联合切除术共26例,现报告如下。     

三孔法腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除68例

目的探讨采用三孔法腹腔镜同时实施胆囊、阑尾联合切除术的可行性。方法对68例急、慢性胆囊炎、胆结石或胆囊息肉合并急、慢性阑尾炎患者实施三孔法腹腔镜胆囊、阑尾联合切除术。结果手术均获成功。平均手术时间70(50~90)m in,平均住院日5(4~7)d。全部病人均恢复正常工作或生活,中位随访7(4~20)个月,无并发症发生。结论在掌握好手术指征及熟练的腹腔镜操作技术的前提下,三孔法腹腔镜胆囊和阑尾联合切除是安全可行的方法。     

慢性胆囊炎合并慢性阑尾炎的腹腔镜联合手术治疗

目的 探讨腹腔镜联合手术在慢性胆囊炎合并慢性阑尾炎中的应用价值。方法 31例慢性胆囊炎合并慢性阑尾炎实施腹腔镜下胆囊阑尾联合切除术，其中慢性阑尾炎的诊断在腹腔镜下探查确定。结果 手术均获成功，无中转开腹。联合手术时间较单纯LC增加10min-30min,平均增加14min。术后无相关并发症发生，术中腹腔镜慢性阑尾炎诊断与术后病理诊断一致。结论 慢性胆囊炎合并慢性阑尾炎适宜采用腹腔镜技术进行诊断治疗，在不增加创伤的情况下明确慢性阑尾炎的诊断，并同时切除。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术操作方法的探讨(附150例报告)

目的：探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术（laparoscopic appendectomy,LA）中阑尾系膜的处理方法.方法：我院采用“阑尾系膜撕脱法”累计实施LA150例,其中慢性阑尾炎36例,急性单纯性阑尾炎48例,急性化脓性阑尾炎52例,坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎14例.结果：全组均顺利完成阑尾系膜的处理,1～2min即可完成,术中术后无出血发生.结论：阑尾系膜撕脱法较其他方法更快速、安全可靠.     

Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is safe for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. This study compared recovery after laparoscopic (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) for confirmed appendicitis, carried out by experienced surgeons in an educational setting. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-three patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis suitable for LA were randomized prospectively to either LA or OA in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was time to full recovery. Secondary endpoints were operating time, complications, hospital stay and functional status. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between LA and OA in time to full recovery (9 and 11 days respectively; P = 0.225). Operating time was 55 min in the LA group and 60 min in the OA group (P = 0.416). The complication rate was 8.6 and 11.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.696), and median hospital stay was 2 days in both groups (P = 0.192). Functional status was significantly better in the LA group 7-10 days after operation (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in time to full recovery after LA and OA in patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis. A trend towards better physical activity was noted after the laparoscopic procedure.     

腹腔镜二孔法与三孔法阑尾切除术的对比研究

目的探讨腹腔镜二孔法与三孔法阑尾切除术的临床应用指征。方法回顾性分析腹腔镜阑尾切除术(Laparoscopic Appendectomy，LA)的临床资料，比较二孔法与三孔法LA的手术时间、戳孔感染率。本组206例完成LA术，其中三孔法148例(9例由二孔法中转)、二孔法58例。结果平均手术时间二孔法显著短于三孔法(P=0．000)。急性单纯性阑尾炎和慢性阑尾炎LA术后戳孔均无感染，急性化脓性阑尾炎戳孔感染率二孔法与三孔法无显著性差异(P=1．000)，急性坏疽性阑尾炎戳孔感染率二孔法显著高于三孔法(P=0．039)。结论LA二孔法具有更加微创、美容的特点，可作为单纯性、化脓性及慢性阑尾炎的首选术式．但对于坏疽性阑尾炎则宜选择三孔法。     

Laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible for the complicated appendicitis

We reviewed the results of 339 consecutive appendectomies, including perforated appendicitis, to assess the advantages of the laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis. Three hundred and eighty-eight patients underwent appendectomy at the Keimyung University Kyungju Dongsan Hospital between March 1994 and June 1996; 339 patients were treated using laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), and 49 patients who were treated with open appendectomy. Special emphasis was given to the results of LA in 27 patients with perforated appendicitis. The mean duration of the operating time for LA was 48.9 minutes. For six patients (1.8%), the procedure was converted to open surgery. Minor complications developed in eight patients (2.4%). There were no complications in the 27 patients with perforated appendicitis. Our experience with LA in perforated appendicitis is limited, but our results show that LA is a safe and acceptable procedure for all forms of acute appendicitis.     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效及对并发症的影响

目的比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA）与开腹阑尾切除术（OA）治疗急阑尾炎的临床疗效及并发症。 方法选择2014年1月至2015年5月收治的拟行阑尾切除术的阑尾炎患者118例,将患者随机分为试验组和对照组,每组59例,试验组采用LA术,对照组采用OA术,比较两组患者的临床效果及并发症发生情况,评价急性和慢性阑尾炎行腹腔镜手术的效果。 结果与对照组比较,试验组的手术时间延长,而住院时间、术后首次下床、排气及进食时间均明显缩短,24 h镇痛药物使用率也显著减少,住院费用明显增加（t=14.342、6.916、4.166、9.527、8.036,χ²=5.950,t=32.663,P<0.05）。试验组中急性阑尾炎患者34例,与25例慢性阑尾炎患者比较,手术时间、住院时间、术后首次排气及进食时间均明显延长,术中出血量明显增加（t=8.195、1.776、5.329、4.337、3.757,P<0.05）。试验组术后24 h、48 h时白细胞（WBC）、C反应蛋白（CRP）水平均显著低于对照组（P<0.05）;伤口感染、腹腔脓肿的发生率及总发生率显著低于对照组（χ²=4.827、4.140、10.602,P<0.05）。 结论LA治疗急性及慢性阑尾炎均安全有效,可减少术后并发症,促进术后恢复。     

Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute and recurrent appendicitis: retrospective analysis of a single-group 5-year experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Twenty years after the first report of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), its role in the treatment of appendicitis is still under debate. We report herein a retrospective analysis of our cases of LA in the last 5 years, during which we adopted a policy of an almost uniform laparoscopic approach on a rather selected population composed mainly of women with acute or recurrent lower quadrant abdominal pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed on 33 male and 98 female patients. The mean age at operation was 25.7+/-11.4 years (range 11-59 years). Acute appendicitis with localized or diffuse peritonitis was present in 34 cases. In the remaining 97 patients, the operation was performed for acute or recurring symptoms of lower quadrant abdominal pain. RESULTS: There were no conversions to open surgery. The operating time was 45+/-17 minutes (range 30-110 minutes). The pathology examination of the removed appendices showed acute appendicitis in 34 cases and chronic inflammation in the remaining 97 patients. In one case, histology revealed a coexisting mucinous carcinoid that extended to the perivisceral fat, and a completion right hemicolectomy was performed. Complications were minor in most cases. Reoperation for deep abdominal abscess or hematoma was required in three cases. The mean hospital stay was 2.59+/-1.58 days (range 24 hours-11 days). CONCLUSION: In our hands, LA has proven to be safe and effective. The laparoscopic operation has significant advantages in terms of lower invasiveness and better diagnostic capability. It is especially useful in women of child-bearing age, in whom it may be considered the procedure of choice.     

Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest increased intraabdominal abscess (IA) rates following laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), especially for perforated appendicitis. Consequently, an open approach has been advocated. The aim of our study is to compare IA rates following LA performed by a laparoscopic surgery and a general surgical service within the same institution. METHODS: Data of LA patients treated at Los Angeles County-University of Southern California (LAC-USC) Medical Center between March 1992 and June 1997 were reviewed. The main outcome measure was postoperative IA. RESULTS: In all, 645 LA were reviewed. A total of 413 LA (285 acute, 61 gangrenous, 67 perforated appendicitis) were performed by three general surgical services (10 attendings). Ten abscesses occurred postoperatively (2.4%), 6 with perforated appendicitis. After the laparoscopic service was introduced, 232 standardized LA (126 acute, 46 gangrenous, 60 perforated) were performed by two attendings. One IA occurred (gangrenous appendicitis). The IA rate for perforated appendicitis was significantly lower on the laparoscopic service (P = 0.025). There was no difference in IA rates for acute and gangrenous appendicitis. There was no mortality in either group. CONCLUSION: IA rate following LA for perforated appendicitis was significantly reduced on the laparoscopic service. Mastery of the learning curve and addition of specific surgical techniques explained this improved result. Therefore, laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis may not be contraindicated, even for perforated appendicitis.     

急性阑尾炎行腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术的比较

目的对比急性阑尾炎经腹腔镜切除与传统开腹切除的手术效果及优缺点。方法对2004年2月~2004年12月临床诊断为急性阑尾炎的病人123例,其中行腹腔镜手术59例,开腹手术64例。比较两种术式的手术时间,术后下床活动时间,术后进食时间,术后出院时间,止疼药使用率,其他器官探查阳性率及综合费用。结果通过比较两种术式的以上各指标,腹腔镜手术组有明显的优势。结论急性阑尾炎经腹腔镜手术具有创伤小、疼痛轻、恢复快、住院时间短及美容等优点,是治疗急性阑尾炎理想的手术方式。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除与开腹阑尾切除术的对比研究及Meta分析

目的比较腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术对急性阑尾炎的疗效和手术安全性。方法收集2006年10月至2007年10月问120例急性阑尾炎患者进行前瞻性研究,随机分为两组,分别采用腹腔镜阑尾切除（LA）术式和开腹阑尾切除（OA）术式,对手术时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、止痛药物应用时间、开始进食时间、住院天数和术后并发症等指标进行比较分析。并对1996年1月至2008年12月期间的该类前瞻性随机对照研究（RCT）文献进行Meta分析,比较两种术式手术时间、住院天数和并发症等指标。结果本组资料表明,两组手术时间、出血量无明显差异,而LA组肠功能恢复时间、止痛药物应用时间、住院天数明显短于OA组,LA组手术并发症也少于OA组;Meta分析有6组资料纳入,LA住院天数和手术并发症少于OA组,而两组的手术时间无明显差异。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有恢复时间短、术后疼痛轻、住院时间短和并发症发生率低等优点,值得推荐。