Use of ERCP to identify the site of traumatic injuries of the main pancreatic duct in children

Major pancreatic injuries in children are uncommon but potentially very serious. They usually occur in active young boys following characteristic accidents. Despite this they frequently go unrecognized for prolonged periods. Four patients with delayed recognition of blunt pancreatic trauma are described. The presence of pancreatic injury was identified by hyperamylasaemia in every case. Ultrasound and CT scanning were helpful in identifying pseudocysts but accurate pre-operative diagnosis of main duct disruption required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Surgical treatment involved a full exploration of the lesser sac with drainage of the cyst contents and identification of the site of extravasation. Two patients with proximal duct lacerations were treated by internal drainage into a Roux-en-Y loop with the addition of a distal pancreaticojejunostomy in one case. Two patients with distal lacerations were treated by distal pancreatectomy and oversewing of the remnant. All four patients recovered and were well at follow-up. Early ERCP is the only reliable method of identifying duct injuries which require urgent surgery. It should be considered in all children with blunt pancreatic trauma.     

Management of major pancreatic duct injuries in children.

BACKGROUND: The operative versus nonoperative management of major pancreatic ductal injuries in children remains controversial. The computed tomographic (CT) scan may not be accurate for determination of location and type of injury. We report our experience with ductal injury including the recent use of acute endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for definitive imaging, and an endoscopically placed stent as definitive treatment. This has not been reported in children. METHODS: In review of 14,245 admissions to a regional pediatric trauma center over a 14-year period, 18 patients with major ductal injuries from blunt trauma were noted. Records were reviewed for mechanism of injury, method of diagnosis, management, and outcome. RESULTS: There were 10 girls and 8 boys, ranging in age from 2 months to 13 years. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle and bicycle crashes. Admission CT scan in 16 children was suggestive of injury in 11, and missed the injury in 5. Distal pancreatectomy was carried out in eight patients with distal duct injuries: one died of central nervous system injury. Nonoperative management in three proximal duct injuries suggested by initial CT scan and in three missed distal duct injuries resulted in pseudocyst formation in five survivors; one patient died of central nervous system injuries. Two children with minimal abdominal pain, normal initial serum amylase, and no initial imaging developed pseudocysts. Two of seven pseudocysts spontaneously resolved and five were treated by delayed cystogastrostomy. Two recent children with suggestive CT scans were definitively diagnosed by acute ERCP and treated by endoscopic stenting. Clinical and chemical improvement was rapid and complete and the stents were removed. Follow-up ERCP, CT scan, and serum amylase levels are normal 1 year after injury. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic ductal injuries are rare in pediatric blunt trauma. CT scanning is suggestive but not accurate for the diagnosis of type and location of injury. Acute ERCP is safe and accurate in children, and may allow for definitive treatment of ductal injury by stenting in selected patients. If stenting is not possible, or fails, distal injuries are best treated by distal pancreatectomy; proximal injuries may be managed nonoperatively, allowing for the formation and uneventful drainage of a pseudocyst.     

Contribution of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in management of complications following distal pancreatic trauma.

Pancreatic trauma is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Treatment of this condition is controversial. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the management of distal pancreatic trauma and its complications, assessing the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The clinical course and surgical management of 38 patients with distal pancreatic trauma were analyzed in a university hospital in Paris, France. Twenty-five patients were referred after initial treatment elsewhere. As initial treatment, patients underwent external drainage (n = 25), pancreatic resection (n = 6), laparotomy alone (n = 5), and no surgery (n = 2). Nineteen patients with pancreatic duct injury and no pancreatic resection developed fistulae (n = 14) or pseudocysts (n = 5). Only four of these patients recovered without a subsequent pancreatic resection or internal drainage procedure. In the absence of duct injury, patients recovered without the need for pancreatic resection. ERCP was performed in 16 cases and provided critical information on duct status influencing surgical management. We conclude that the presence of pancreatic trauma duct injury is a major determinant of complications and outcome after pancreatic trauma. It is optimally managed by pancreatic resection. ERCP is valuable in providing a definitive diagnosis of duct injury, thereby directing treatment.     

Failure of percutaneous drainage in children with traumatic pancreatic pseudocysts

Recent reports have documented the successful use of percutaneous drainage (PD) in the management of traumatic pancreatic pseudocysts in children. This study presents four cases of pancreatic pseudocyst in which percutaneous catheter drainage was performed. In one instance, no operative therapy was required. However, in the other three cases PD failed to resolve the problem and distal pancreatectomy with splenic salvage was performed when contrast studies (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or catheter injection) demonstrated disruption of the main pancreatic duct. This report suggests that children with pancreatic pseudocysts unresponsive to PD require prompt investigation of ductal anatomy to rule out transection or other major injury.     

ERCP������������β�г���������8������

??Clinical application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: A report of 8 cases WU Wen-guang*??ZHANG Wen-jie??GU Jun??et al. *Department of General Surgery??Institute of Biliary Tract Disease??Xinhua Hospital??Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine??Shanghai 200092??China
Corresponding author??WANG Xue-feng??E-mail??wxxfd@live.cn
Abstract Objective To evaluate the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Methods A retrospective review of 8 cases with ongoing symptoms related to the pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy was conducted from November 2010 to February 2014 at Department of General Surgery and Laboratory of General Surgery??Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Results ERCP was performed and demonstrated clear extravasation of contrast from the main pancreas duct at the site of pancreas transection in all eight cases. Pancreatic duct stents were placed in all patients at a median time of 15.8 days (range??9-26 days)postoperation and the pancreatic fistula resolved in all patients after a median duration of 16.0 days(range??12-25 days) from the index ERCP. Pancreatic duct stent were removed in all patients three months after discharge??and no patient has developed recurrent pancreatic fistula after stent removal. There was no episodes of pancreatitis??perforation??or other complications associated with pancreatic duct stent placement or removal. Conclusion ERCP with pancreatic duct stent may have a beneficial role in the management of patients with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy and the approach should be considered in patients not responsive to traditional management strategies.     

Demonstration of microcystic disease of the pancreas by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Report of a case

A case of microcystic disease of the pancreas which was clearly demonstrated by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is reported herein. Cystic dilatation of the pancreatic duct was recognized by computed tomography scanning and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Furthermore, the existence of microcystic clusters surrounding the dilated pancreatic duct were clearly visualized by MRCP. These microcystic clusters were strongly suspected preoperatively of having caused dilatation of the major pancreatic duct. Based on these findings, a distal pancreatectomy was performed. The operative specimen showed no accumulation of mucin and no evident lesions in the dilated pancreatic duct, being inconsistent with the entity of a mucus-producing tumor. Pathological examination revealed that the inner parts of microcysts constituted columnar epithelium with mucus production and papillary growth. Thus, a final histological diagnosis of intraductal papillary adenoma with idiopathic pancreatic duct ectasia was confirmed. In conclusion, MRCP, being a less aggressive diagnostic procedure than ERCP, proved extremely useful for obtaining precise information on cystic lesions of the pancreas in this patient.     

ERCP辅助治疗胰体尾切除术后胰瘘8例报告

目的 探讨内镜逆行胰胆管造影（ERCP）辅助治疗胰体尾切除术后胰瘘的疗效。 方法 回顾性分析上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普外科2010年11月至2014年2月间行胰体尾切除术后因胰瘘相关症状而采用ERCP辅助治疗的8例病人临床资料,并分析其术后疗效。结果 8例病人在ERCP下均见胰腺主胰管有明显的造影剂外渗出,均行胰管支架置入术,支架置入距手术日的平均时间为15.8（9～26）d,ERCP术后胰瘘愈合时间平均为16.0（12～25）d。所有病人的胰管支架在出院3个月后拔除,支架拔除后无胰瘘复发病例。治疗期间均未发生胰腺炎、穿孔及其他并发症。结论 对常规方法无效的胰体尾切除合并胰瘘病人,ERCP辅助行胰管支架置入可改善治疗效果。     

MANAGEMENT OF TRANSECTED PANCREAS IN CHILDREN

The pancreas is the fourth most commonly injured intra-abdominal organ in children who sustain blunt abdominal trauma. Appropriate management of the injured pancreas has been controversial. With the advent of the computerized tomography scan, paediatric surgeons have tended to manage pancreatic injuries non-operatively. However. if pseudocysts develop. non-operative management may necessarily entail a long hospital course involving total parenleral nutrition. drainage procedures and attendant morbidity. The critical element in planning therapy is to determine the status of the pancreatic duct. We have recently encountered five children who suffered blunt pancreatic injury where the main pancreatic duct was determined to have been transected. These children underwent spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy with resultant shorter hospital stays and minimal long-term morbidity. We suggest that in children with pancreatic injury where the main pancreatic duct has been transected early operative management rather than non-operative therapy is the procedure of choice. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should be used to determine the status of the pancreatic duct. This modality can be both diagnostic and therapeutic in appropriate circumstances.     

Late complications of pancreatic trauma

Pancreatic trauma is rare and experience concerning its management is consequently limited. Lessons learnt in the investigation and treatment of a group of 11 patients (median age 28.0 years, range 14-44 years), who presented with the sequelae of trauma, are described. These patients were referred to a centre with an interest in pancreatic disease at a median time of 6.0 months (range 1.5-34 months) after blunt (n = 9) or penetrating (n = 2) injury to the pancreas. Ten of the 11 patients had undergone either single (n = 4) or multiple (n = 6) previous operations. Ten of the 11 patients had either strictures or disruptions of the main pancreatic duct demonstrated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and ultrasonography (n = 8) or by exploration of the pancreas (n = 2). Satisfactory results were achieved by non-operative treatment in one patient and by distal pancreatectomy in eight. One further patient, who underwent distal pancreatectomy, later required completion resection because of unsuspected ductal injury in the head of the gland. The final patient continued with symptoms of pancreatitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy. It is concluded that the non-resolving sequelae of pancreatic trauma are associated with injury to the main pancreatic duct and that specialist investigation should be performed before surgical intervention is contemplated.     

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the assessment of pancreatic duct trauma and its sequelae: preliminary findings

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the evaluation of pancreatic duct trauma and pancreas-specific complications. METHODS: Ten hemodynamically stable patients with clinically suspected pancreatic injury related to blunt abdominal trauma (n = 8), penetrating trauma (n = 1), or iatrogenic trauma (n = 1) underwent MRCP. Two abdominal radiologists conducted a review of the MRCPs to assess for the presence or absence of pancreatic duct trauma and pancreas-specific complications such as pseudocysts. The MRCP findings were correlated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograms (n = 2), surgical findings (n = 1), computed tomographic scans (n = 10), and with clinical, biochemical or imaging follow-up (n = 10). RESULTS: Diagnostic quality MRCPs were obtained in each of the 10 patients. A mean imaging time of 5 minutes was required to perform the MRCPs. Pancreatic duct injuries were detected in four patients; pseudocysts were detected in three of these four patients. The pancreatic duct injuries in three patients were acute or subacute. In one of the three patients, disruption of a side branch of the pancreatic duct diagnosed with MRCP was not detected with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography but was confirmed surgically. In the fourth patient, the pancreatic duct injury was chronic; MRCP revealed a posttraumatic stricture in this patient who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma 17 years previously. In the remaining six patients, pancreatic duct trauma was excluded with MRCP. The information derived from the MRCPs was used to guide clinical decision-making in all 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: MRCP enables noninvasive detection and exclusion of pancreatic duct trauma and pancreas-specific complications and provides information that may be used to guide management decisions.     

闭合性胰腺损伤的诊断和治疗：附32例报告

目的：探讨闭合性胰腺损伤的早期诊断和治疗方法。
方法：回顾性分析收治的闭合性胰腺损伤32例的临床资料。
结果：CT诊断符合率为79.3%。非手术治疗4例,其中I级3例,II级1例。 手术治疗28例,I级5例和II级7例行胰周清创外引流术;6例Ⅲ级胰腺损伤中,行远端胰腺切除术和脾切除术4例,行保脾远端胰腺切除术2例;5例Ⅳ级胰腺损伤中,行胰腺空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术4例,行远端胰腺切除术和脾切除术1例;5例Ⅴ级胰腺损伤中,行十二指肠憩室化手术1例,2例胰头严重毁损伤行胰十二指肠切除术,2例由于复合伤情较重,首先应用损伤控制手术,于受伤后48 h再次行彻底性手术。全组死亡3例,死亡原因主要为多器官功能衰竭,余25例中术后发生并发症19例（76.0%）,包括胰瘘、胰腺假性囊肿等,均经治疗而愈。
结论：无明确主胰管损伤、临床情况稳定时,胰腺损伤可先行非手术治疗。手术治疗适于重度闭合性胰腺损伤,根据胰腺损伤的程度选择合理的手术方式可提高治愈率,降低病死率。     

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of traumatic pancreatic pseudocysts. A report of 2 cases.

The results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 2 patients with traumatic pancreatic pseudocysts are described. As a pre-operative procedure, this investigation provided useful information on the exact site of duct disruption. In both patients, the pancreatic pseudocysts were drained via a posterior cyst gastrostomy, and they have remained well since surgery. Follow-up ERCP at 6 and 12 months demonstrated complete stenosis at the site of duct disruption. The value of ERCP in the pre-operative and follow-up management of traumatic pancreatic pseudocysts is discussed.     

ERCP in evaluating the mode of therapy in pancreatic pseudocyst

Twenty patients with ultrasonographic or computed tomographic diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocyst were referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Two of these were found at laparotomy not to have pseudocysts and were excluded. Pancreatography was successful in 15 out of 18 cases (83%) and cholangiography in 12 out of 18 cases (67%). Three types of pseudocysts were noticed according to the communication of the pseudocyst to the main pancreatic duct and the presence of pancreatic duct stenosis. Successful treatment included two spontaneous resolutions, two internal drainages and three left pancreatic resections. In the eight percutaneous external drainages four recurrences (50%) occurred, one after closure of temporary pancreatocutaneous fistula. All the recurrences occurred in Type III pseudocysts with communication of the pseudocysts to stenotic main pancreatic duct. In these cases internal drainage would have been the preferable treatment method. We believe that by ERCP one can identify pseudocysts not suitable for external drainage.     

Failure of percutaneous catheter drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst

Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts under CT radiologic guidance is a valuable adjunct or alternative to operative pseudocyst management. PCD failure is characterized by the development of recurrent pseudocysts or external pancreatic fistulas. The purpose of this study is to define the cause and management of PCD failure patients. A retrospective review and analysis of patients with symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts managed with PCD who required subsequent operative treatment because of PCD failure was undertaken. There were 23 study patients (18 men, 5 women) with a mean age of 44 years identified over a 13-year time period. Pancreatitis etiology was alcohol abuse in 10, gallstones in 7, pancreas divisum in 3, trauma in 2, and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in 1. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography findings were: 13 genu strictures, 4 main pancreatic duct dilations, 2 head strictures, 1 body stricture, 1 stricture in the tail, 1 intact duct, and 1 unknown. Operations used to manage PCD failures were: lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (LPJ) in 9 patients, Roux-en-Y pancreatic fistula jejunostomy in 7, distal pancreatectomy in 3, caudal pancreatectomy in 2, pancreatoduodenectomy in 1, cyst gastrotomy in 1, and caudal pancreatojejunostomy in 1. Follow-up has ranged from 1 to 13 years (mean, 5 years). Five patients who underwent pancreatic fistula jejunostomy developed recurrent pseudocysts or pancreatitis. There have been no recurrent pseudocysts or fistulas in patients managed with LPJ or pancreatic resection. Genu strictures were the cause of PCD failure in the majority of patients. LPJ is the treatment of choice for genu strictures but may not always be possible because of chronic inflammatory changes. Roux-en-Y pancreatic fistula jejunostomy is an acceptable alternative. Recurrent pseudocysts in the head and body are treated with LPJ with cyst incorporation. Pancreatic resection is appropriate for certain strictures of the head, body, and pancreatic tail. Failure of PCD is associated with an underlying ductal disorder that needs to be defined preoperatively with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to select the appropriate operation.     

Early management of traumatic pancreatic transection by spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

Pancreatic trauma is a common cause of acute pancreatitis in children and is often treated by conservative measures alone. Conservative measures are more likely to fail when there is complete pancreatic duct disruption. We report a case of complete transaction of the pancreatic neck following blunt trauma in a 14-year-old boy. Complete duct disruption was confirmed by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. The patient was successfully managed by a laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy and recovered quickly without complications. The merit of a laparoscopic approach to severe pancreatic injury in children is discussed.     

Surgical Management of Pancreaticopleural Fistulas

Background: Pancreaticopleural fistula is defined as a communication between the pancreatic duct and the pleural cavity. Initially, it is treated conservatively and endoscopically. Surgery is performed within a small group of patients in whom other therapeutic approaches failed.

Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, nine patients with pancreaticopleural fistulas were treated. In 8 of nine patients, conservative treatment was used experimentally. Patients were considered as having a pancreaticopleural fistula before operation if a fistulous tract was seen on radiologic examination or if a large exudative pleural effusion was present with an amylase level > 5.000 U/L and total pleural fluid protein content > 3 g/L. All patients were evaluated for computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (USG) examination and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Results: The mean age of patients was 47 (35–51) years. Pancreatic effusion was present in the left pleural cavity in 6 cases, in the right cavity in 2 and on both sides in 1 case. The causes of fistula formation were as follows: chronic pancreatitis due to alcohol abuse-seven patients, rupture of the pancreas and main pancreatic duct due to trauma-one patient and pancreatolithiasis-1 patient. Endoscopic stenting of the main pancreatic duct was unsuccessful in all patients except one. Five patients underwent distal (n = 4) or corporocaudal pancreatectomy (n = 1) with splenectomy, two underwent pancreatic duct anastomosis with an intestinal loop (the Partington-Rochelle procedure) and one underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Postoperative complications were observed in two patients. There were no cases of hospital mortality. The mean time of hospitalization was 16 days. Seven patients reported for the follow-up examination in the postoperative period of 10 to 67 months. No recurrence of pleural effusion was noted in any case. Conclusion: Surgical treatment is effective and safe for the management of a pancreaticopleural fistula when conservative and endoscopic therapy has failed.     

Traumatic pancreatic fistula with sinistral portal hypertension: Surgical management

Combined ductal and vascular injuries are awesome complications of pancreatic injury. We report on a 29-year-old male unrestrained driver who sustained a blunt abdominal injury from the steering wheel in a high velocity head-on car collision. He developed a pancreatic fistula, portosplenic venous thrombosis and sinistral portal hypertension as a result of complete duct disruption at the pancreatic neck. We describe a safe surgical strategy of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy after failed medical and endoscopic management.     

Isolated main pancreatic duct injuries spectrum and management

BACKGROUND: We present our experience with the rare injury of isolated major pancreatic duct disruption. METHODS: From 1997 to 2003, 3 females and 13 males whose age ranged from 4 to 46 years were identified. Stabs caused 2 and blunt trauma 14 injuries. Nine presented acutely. Delay occurred in 7 patients, 6 with pseudocysts and 1 with infected pancreatic necrosis. RESULTS: Nine cases were managed in the acute phase: 6 by splenic-preserving distal pancreatectomy and 2 by distal pancreatico-enteric anastomosis; 1 was drained. A small pseudocyst and transient pancreatic fistula were the only complications. The 6 cases with pseudocysts were managed endoscopically. Five were stented and 1 was drained without stent. Four had resolution. Two had stent cyst migration. One required a pancreaticojejunostomy and another distal pancreatectomy. One patient died of infected pancreatic necrosis. Long-term outcome could not be assessed. CONCLUSION: In the acute situation, resection or distal pancreatico-enteric anastomoses are attainable with low morbidity. Endoscopic pseudocyst management options are feasible, with good short-term resolution. Giant cysts may be better managed operatively.     

Endoscopic stenting for selected cases of biliary fistula after hepatic hydatid surgery

Background Biliary fistula develops in 4%–28% of patients after hepatic hydatid disease (HHD) surgery. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) are helpful in the treatment of this complication, persistent fistulas may occur. We therefore conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic biliary stenting in the treatment of biliary fistulas after HHD. Methods In this study, 84 patients who underwent ERCP for postoperative biliary fistula due to HHD were evaluated. Group I included 70 patients treated with only ES, and group II included 14 patients who underwent biliary stenting as their initial treatment. Demographic data, complications, the results of treatment and the reasons for the failure were compared between two groups. Results Ninety-five ERCPs were performed. In 63 patients, biliary fistulas were successfully treated with only ERCP and ES. However, 7 patients underwent repeat ERCP and stent placement because of persistent fistula. Biliary stenting was initially performed in 14 patients. The average time for closure of the fistula was 14 ± 10 days and 7 ± 3 days in group I (7 patients with repeat ERCP were excluded.) and group II, respectively (p = 0.007). There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rates between the groups. Conclusions Although ES is effective in the treatment of biliary fistula after HHD surgery, endoscopic biliary stenting may be considered as the initial procedure in patients with biliary stricture, incomplete clearance of hydatid material in the bile duct, and persisting biliary fistulas after treatment with ERCP and ES.     

Local pancreatic resection with preoperative endoscopic transpapillary stenting

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula, although not common, can cause serious complications after pancreatectomy. During local pancreatectomy, injury to the main pancreatic duct (in addition to the accessory and side branch ducts) increases the risk of pancreatic fistula formation. Nonetheless, local pancreatic resection maintains the advantage of preserving pancreatic parenchyma. METHODS: In this study, we reviewed the cases of 5 patients who underwent preoperative endoscopic transpapillary pancreatic stenting to help prevent refractory fistula development after local pancreatic resection. RESULTS: Stenting was successful in all 5 patients, and none developed a refractory grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in selected patients, preoperative endoscopic pancreatic stenting may be an effective prophylactic measure to lower the risk of refractory grade C fistula formation after local pancreatic resection.