不同术式治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症的疗效对比

目的 比较经皮内窥镜下腰椎椎间盘切除术(PELD)、后路显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术(MED)及后路小切口椎间盘切除术(MD)治疗腰椎椎间盘突出症(LDH)的疗效.方法 回顾性分析2016年8月—2018年10月在重庆医科大学附属永川医院接受手术治疗的96例LDH患者临床资料,按照手术方式分为PELD组、MED组和MD组,...     

后路椎间盘镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的中长期随访及疗效分析

自1997年Foley和Smith首次报道后路椎间盘镜(MED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症以来,随着腰椎后路椎间盘镜器械的完善和手术操作的规范,该技术已成为治疗腰椎间盘突出症的有效手段之一。根据国内外大量文献报道显示其     

胸椎间盘突出症的手术治疗

目的 探讨胸腰椎间盘突出症(TDH)的临床表现、诊断及手术治疗方法及效果.方法 经后路手术治疗TDH患者24例,采用后路全椎板切除,经一侧或两侧关节突和下位横突进入切除突出椎间盘,其中15例采用后路椎间植骨融合双侧钉棒系统内固定,9例采用后路椎间植骨融合单侧钉棒系统内固定.结果 随访1～8年,23例脊髓神经功能均有不同程度改善,1例T10～11巨大椎间盘突出者神经功能无改善.1例T8～9椎间盘突出合并后纵韧带骨化者术后症状加重,经对症治疗后1例神经症状加重者术后26个月神经功能恢复至D级.按Otani et al方法评价疗效:优16例,良8例,优良率达91.6%.结论 CT或MRI检查对TDH确诊与定位有重要价值.后路经关节突和下位横突(单或双侧)入路切除胸椎间盘可获得满意疗效.     

椎间盘镜下可膨胀性椎间融合器B-Twin椎间融合术治疗退变失稳性腰椎间盘突出症

目的 探讨后路显微椎间盘镜下可膨胀性椎间融合器B-Twin植入椎间融合术治疗腰椎退变失稳性椎间盘突出症的临床疗效.方法 2005年6月～2008年6月,对32例腰椎退变失稳性巨大型椎间盘突出症行后路显微椎间盘镜联合可膨胀性椎间融合器B-Twin植入椎间融合术.结果 术后1周VAS疼痛评分由术前(8.7±0.3)分降至术...     

多节段颈椎间盘突出症的前后路手术疗效比较

目的　比较多节段颈椎间盘突出症颈椎前后路手术疗效。　方法　回顾性总结 1999年以来治疗的 5 6例多节段颈椎间盘突出症病例 ,其中前路手术组 37例 ,采用摘除病变椎间盘、选择性椎体次全切除、植骨融合及前路钢板固定 ;后路手术组 19例 ,采用全椎板减压、侧块钢板固定。　结果　前路手术者术后随访 6个月～ 4年 5个月 ,平均 2年 10个月 ;后路手术者随访 1年 5个月～ 5年 1个月 ,平均 3年 8个月。两组 JOA评分及硬脊膜囊矢状径比较术前差异无统计学意义 (P>0 .0 5 ) ,术后差异有统计学意义 (P<0 .0 1) ,前路手术组高于后路手术组 ;术后改善率前路手术组高于后路手术组 ,差异有统计学意义 (P<0 .0 1) ;并发症例数前路手术组略多于后路手术组。　结论　前路手术组疗效明显优于后路手术组。前路减压、植骨、钢板固定术是治疗多节段颈椎间盘突出症的有效方法     

椎间盘镜下腰椎间盘切除术疗效及主要并发症的防治

目的：了解我国目前椎间盘镜下椎间盘切除术的疗效和主要并发症的发生概况。方法：利用中国期刊全数据库，对近年正式发表的论进行统计，分析椎间盘镜下椎间盘切除术的疗效、主要并发症的发生率及其原因和防治。结果：早期的侧后路椎间盘镜(AMD)系统的手术优良率为84．01％，而近期的后路椎间盘镜(MED)系统超过95％。神经损伤与椎间隙感染的发生率分别为0．45％和0.77％。结论：与传统的椎间盘切除术比较，椎间盘镜下椎间盘切除术，尤其后路MED手术优良率高，并发症少，且可有效预防，是治疗腰椎间盘突出症的一种有效方法。     

后路椎间盘镜在治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的应用

目的：探讨后路椎间盘镜在治疗腰椎管狭窄症中的应用。方法：2000年2月--2001年12月退行性腰椎管狭窄症142例行后路椎间盘镜下椎管有限减压、全椎板或半椎板切除减压、开窗减压术。结果：应用后路椎间盘镜行椎管有限减压87例，减压松解充分。82例随访平均18月，优良率92．7％(优58例，良18例)。无并发症。结论：单纯腰椎间盘膨出或突出、黄韧带肥厚和小关节增生引起的退行性腰椎管狭窄症是后路椎间盘镜下椎管有限减压的适应证。满意的手术效果取决于：病人选择适当，术中操作精细，减压彻底。     

伴HIZ的椎间盘源性腰痛的诊断与治疗体会

目的探讨伴HIZ的椎间盘源性腰痛的诊断及采用后路椎间盘切除椎间融合术治疗的临床疗效。方法 33例符合椎间盘源性腰痛临床表现同时伴单节段HIZ的患者,经椎间盘造影28例明确诊断为椎间盘源性腰痛,均行后路椎间盘切除椎间植骨融合术治疗。术前及术后评估患者的腰部疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)及Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry Disability Index ODI)。结果在符合椎盘源性腰痛临床表现的患者中,HIZ预示着椎间盘造影的阳性率较高(84.8%)。末次随访时所有病人均恢复正常生活,腰痛较术前明显缓解,腰痛的VAS评分及ODI与术前比较差异有统计学意义。结论临床表现及HIZ可提供椎间盘源性腰痛的诊断参考,椎间盘造影是诊断椎间盘源性腰痛的可靠方法,后路椎间融合术治疗伴HIZ的椎间盘源性腰痛效果理想。     

后路椎间盘镜治疗多节段腰椎间盘突出症

1997年,Foley和Smit研制出经腰椎后路正中入路的显微内窥镜椎间盘手术（microendoscopy disectomy,MED）系统,这套系统具有创伤小,手术时间短,费用低,疗效确切等优点,能广泛应用于腰椎间盘突出症的治疗,对于多节段椎间盘突出,我科2007年采用后路腰椎间盘镜手术治疗45例（93个椎间盘）,收到较好的效果,现报告如下。     

椎间盘源性腰痛的诊断及手术治疗

目的:分析和总结椎间盘源性腰痛的诊断及手术疗效。方法:对50例腰痛患者应用MRI及椎间盘造影进行术前检查,并对确诊患者行后路病变节段的椎间盘切除、椎间融合、椎弓根螺钉内固定术手术治疗,对治疗结果作回顾性分析。结果:39例确诊患者经治疗后,效果确切,优良率92.3%。统计学结果显示,术前MRI信号改变,包括高信号(HIZ)现象以及终板信号改变,与椎间盘造影阳性的结果在本组患者中显示有较高相关性。结论:MRI、椎间盘造影可为椎间盘源性腰痛的诊断提供重要的依据;后路椎间盘切除、椎体间融合、椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗椎间盘源性腰痛疗效确切。     

MED与微创TLIF治疗伴Modic改变的腰椎间盘突出症的对比研究

目的：对比分析椎间盘镜下髓核切除术（MED）与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术（TLIF）治疗伴Modic改变的腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2003年9月至2008年12月解放军第188医院收治的59例伴Modic改变腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床资料,其中MED组30例、微创TLIF组29例,对比两组疼痛视觉模拟量表（VAS）评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数（ODI）评分的差异。结果59例患者均获得有效随访,随访时间0.5～5年,平均随访时间3年2个月。两组患者术后切口均获Ⅰ期愈合,无椎间隙感染和神经功能损伤。MED组术后5例复发,均表现为下腰痛伴下肢放射性疼痛,MRI检查证实为原位椎间盘再次突出,后采用TLIF术治愈;微创TILF组术后无复发,X线片检查示所有患者骨性融合。术前两组患者VAS及ODI评分比较,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。末次随访时,两组患者VAS及ODI评分均较术前显著下降（P＜0.05）;微创TLIF组明显优于MED组,两组比较,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论与MED比较,微创TLIF治疗伴Modic改变的腰椎间盘突出症具有复发率低、疼痛缓解理想、功能恢复快等优势。     

腰痛患者下腰椎MRI上Modic改变与高信号区的发生情况及意义

目的:探讨腰痛患者下腰椎MRI上Modic改变与腰椎间盘局限性高信号区(high-intensity zone,HIZ)的发生情况及意义。方法:对511例腰痛患者(男263例,女248例;年龄20~70岁,平均48岁)腰椎MRI上L4/5和L5/S1节段的Modic改变和HIZ进行评估,统计两者及两者共存于同一节段的发生率。将有Modic改变和/或HIZ的椎间盘分为Modic组、Modic-HIZ组、HIZ组,比较3组的年龄、椎间盘高度、椎间盘退变程度、腰痛VAS和ODI评分。结果:511例患者中,190例(37.18%)209个节段有Modic改变,127例(24.85%)142个椎间盘有HIZ,18例(3.52%)18个节段出现Modic改变和HIZ共存的现象。HIZ组、Modic-HIZ组和Modic组分别为89例(124个节段)、18例(18个节段)、152例(191个节段),患者平均年龄分别为46.0±11.0岁、49.2±9.2岁和53.5±10.6岁,仅HIZ组和Modic组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);椎间盘平均高度分别为9.93±2.46mm、8.73±2.45mm和7.57±2.21mm,组间两两比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);3组椎间盘退变分级均≥Ⅲ级,其中Ⅳ级+Ⅴ级退变率分别为48.39%、72.22%和75.92%,仅HIZ组与Modic组、Modic-HIZ组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);腰痛VAS分别为8.39±0.32分、8.45±0.30分、8.61±0.54分,ODI评分分别为38.22±4.23分、38.45±4.16分、39.18±3.53分,3组间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:腰痛患者下腰椎Modic改变和HIZ的发生率较高,但两者共存于同一节段的发生率低,当两者共存于同一节段时腰痛并不会明显加重。     

The prevalence of MRI-defined spinal pathoanatomies and their association with Modic changes in individuals seeking care for low back pain

Modic changes are of increasing interest, however their age and gender prevalence are not well described. To date, the associations between Modic changes and other common vertebral pathologies have only been described in small samples (n < 100). Our aim was, in a large dataset of people with low back pain, to (1) describe the prevalence of a range of spinal pathoanatomies, and (2) examine the association between Modic changes and stages of intervertebral disc (IVD) pathology. Common pathologies were coded from the lumbar spine MRIs from 4,233 consecutive people imaged while attending a publicly-funded secondary care outpatient facility in Denmark. Prevalence data were calculated by pathology and by vertebral level. Prevalence was also calculated by age and gender categories for Modic changes. The association between stages of IVD pathology (degeneration, bulge, herniation) and Modic changes at L4/5 and L5/S1 was expressed using prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals. The prevalence of Modic changes and IVD pathology were greater in L4/5 and L5/S1, compared with the upper lumbar spine. There was no significant gender difference in prevalence of Modic changes (p = 0.11). The prevalence of IVD disc pathology occurring concurrently with Modic changes ranged from 11.5 to 17.5% (Type 1), 8.5 to 12.7% (Type 2) and 17.1 to 25.6% (Type 1 and/or 2) while the prevalence occurring in the absence of Modic changes ranged from 0.5 to 6.3% (Type 1), 0.3 to 4.9 (Type 2), 0.8 to 9.7% (Type 1 and/or 2). The associated PR for IVD pathology occurring concurrently with Modic changes ranged from 1.8 to 29.2 (p < 0.05). The highest PR (29.2) was between degeneration and Modic changes, indicating that it is rare for Modic changes to occur without disc degeneration. Spinal pathoanatomy was common in this population, particularly IVD pathologies, and a consistent trend of a relatively greater prevalence in the lower lumbar spine was identified. Modic changes were more likely to be present among individuals with IVD pathology than without, which may implicate mechanical factors as being one aetiological pathway for Modic changes, although other hypotheses may equally explain this association.     

腰椎间盘退变性疾患下腰椎终板形态的MRI观察

【摘要】　目的：在MRI片上观察腰椎间盘退变患者下腰椎终板形态的分布规律,分析终板形态和椎间盘退变的关系。方法：回顾分析两组腰椎间盘退变性疾病患者的术前腰椎MRI,A组110例为单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者,B组35例为椎间盘源性腰痛患者。根据正中矢状面MRI T1像,将终板形态分为凹面、平坦、不规则三型;根据Pfirrmann法评定椎间盘退变程度并将Ⅰ～Ⅴ级分别计为1～5分;按Modic改变分级标准判定各节段终板有无Modic改变。分析下腰椎终板的形态特点及三种分型与椎间盘退变程度、Modic改变等的关系。结果：①435个下腰椎节段中,凹面型终板最多（215/435）,A组中占50.6％（167/330）,B组中占45.7％（48/105）,且主要分布于L3/4（108/215）、L4/5（83/215）节段;平坦型终板占29.0％（126/435）,并主要位于L5/S1节段（76/126）;不规则型终板最少（94/435）,A组中占23.0％（76/330）,B组中占17.1％（18/105）,也主要位于L5/S1节段（45/94）。②A组患者中,凹面型终板退变程度平均为3.31±0.81分,平坦型为3.66±0.64分,不规则型为4.16±0.67分,两两比较有显著差异（P＜0.05）;椎间盘突出节段以平坦型（37/110）和不规则型（43/110）终板占多数,无突出节段则以凹面型（137/220）终板占多数,差异有显著性（P＜0.05）;不规则型终板比凹面型和平坦型更容易伴发Modic改变,差异有显著性（P＜0.05）,凹面型和平坦型间无显著性差异（P＞0.05）。③B组患者中,凹面型终板的椎间盘退变程度平均为3.23±0.86分,平坦型为3.54±0.85分,不规则型为3.94±0.54分,仅凹面型和不规则型间差异有显著性（P＜0.05）。④相同终板形态时A组和B组椎间盘退变程度相比均无显著性差异（P＞0.05）。结论：终板形态与椎间盘退变、Modic改变之间有相关性。终板形态由凹面型到平坦型再到不规则型,腰椎间盘退变程度逐渐加重。影像学上终板形态改变在一定程度上反映了椎间盘退变的程度。     

Predictive value of MRI vertebral end-plate signal changes (Modic) on outcome of surgically treated degenerative disc disease. Results of a cohort study including 60 patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of MRI vertebral end-plate changes (Modic) on clinical outcome of surgically treated lumbar single-level degenerative disc disease (DDD). METHODS: A cohort of 60 patients was included. Patient groups were similar in respect of age, gender and clinical presentation, allowing comparisons. Patient age ranged from 30 to 72 years (mean: 45.8 years). All patients suffered severe chronic low back pain for more than 6 months, with single-level symptomatic DDD. All patients experienced segmental instrumented interbody (n = 22) or posterolateral (n = 38) fusion. Clinical outcome was assessed by using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the functional disability scale of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) for lumbar spine. The number of patients for each Modic group was as follows: Modic type 0, n = 15; Modic type I, n = 22; Modic type II, n = 14; and Modic type I/II, n = 9. Fusion rates were similar for each Modic group of patients. Mean follow-up was 14 months. RESULTS: The pre-operative mean VAS improved by 53.5% (from 8.2+/-2.0 to 3.8+/-1.9, p < 0.05) and the pre-operative mean JOA score by 58% (from 5.5+/-2.1 to 11.0+/-2.4, p < 0.05). Patients harboring Modic type I changes improved much better than others (p < 0.05). Conversely, clinical outcome of patients presenting with Modic type II lesions was poor. CONCLUSION: This study confirms instrumented fusion as an effective treatment in symptomatic lumbar DDD. Preoperative combination of low back pain of discal origin and severe DDD with Modic type I lesion on MRI may lead to excellent results after fusion in a large proportion of patients. Conversely, arthrodesis for patients harboring Modic type II abnormalities implicates smaller benefit of doubtful clinical significance.     

Success of lumbar microdiscectomy in patients with modic changes and low-back pain: a prospective pilot study

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case controlled. OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome after microdiscectomy in patients with disc herniation, concordant sciatica, and low-back pain with Modic I and II degenerative changes compared with similar patients without Modic changes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The decision to perform a microdiscectomy versus a fusion or total disc replacement in a patient with a disc herniation and sciatica may be confounded by the presence of low-back pain, degenerative disc disease, and marrow and endplate (Modic) changes. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients underwent a microdiscectomy by a single surgeon. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients, 6 men and 9 women, with a mean age of 36.7 years (range, 21 to 48 y), with Modic I and II changes. Group 2 contained 15 patients, 9 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 34.1 years (range, 20 to 68 y), without Modic changes. The average duration of low-back pain before surgery was 25.6 months (range 4 to 120 mo) in group 1 and 17.5 months (range 5 to 120 mo) in group 2. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to grade low-back pain and the Oswestry score was used to grade overall disability. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative sciatica, low-back pain, VAS or Oswestry scores for group 1 versus group 2 patients. Postoperatively, all patents had improved sciatica and resolution of any nerve tension sign. Eighty-six percent of patients in group 1 versus 93% of patients in group 2 had improvements in postoperative VAS score for low-back pain at 6 months. Average improvement within each group was 67% and 75%, respectively. VAS scores for low-back pain at 6 months improved from 6.9 to 2.3 (P=0.0005) in group 1 and 6.3 to 1.6 (P=0.0002) in group 2. Group 1 and 2 had 89% and 100% of patients show improvement in postoperative Oswestry score at 6 months with an average improvement of 58% and 84%, respectively. Oswestry scores at 6 months improved from 68.7% to 28.8% (P=0.0007) in group 1 and 61.2% to 9.9% (P=0.00003) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend toward greater improvement in Oswestry scores in patients without Modic changes (P=0.09). Both groups reported statistically significant improvement in sciatica, low-back pain, and disability after microdiscectomy. Microdiscectomy was therefore an effective treatment for disc herniation and concordant sciatica despite low-back pain and Modic I and II degenerative changes. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.     

颈椎终板Modic改变在颈肩痛病例中的分布和相关因素分析

目的 探讨颈椎终板Modic改变在颈肩痛病例中的临床分布特点,并探讨其发生的相关因素.方法 选择2006年一年内因颈肩痛而在本院行颈椎MR和常规X线检查的患者共1023例,回顾性分析颈椎MR中所表现的Modic改变在人群、椎间盘节段、年龄、颈椎曲度和椎间盘退变分级中的分布特点以及其发生的相关因素.结果 1023例共计6138个颈椎椎间盘中90例(8.8％),108(1.8％)个椎间盘邻近终板发生Modic改变.I型32例(3.1％),34个椎间盘(0.6％);Ⅱ型55例(5.4％),71个椎问盘(1.2％)Ⅲ型3例(0.3％),3个椎间盘(0.06％).按照各个椎间盘节段发病数统计,C2-3 O个、C3-4 10个、C415 18个、C5-6 52个、C6-7 23个、C7 T1 5个,发病率分别为O％、0.2％、0.4％、1.0％、0.4％、0.1％.Modic改变和椎间盘退变明显相关(P=0.000).40岁以上是Modic改变发生较多的年龄段(P=0.000).通过Binary Logistic检验逐步回归法得出回归方程为y=一15.514+3.047D+0.684C+0.210L+0.152,4(y为Modic改变、A为年龄、L为椎问盘节段、D为椎间盘退变程度、C为Cobb角分组),P=0.000,EXP值,D=21.048,C=I.982,L=1.233,A=1.164.结论 颈椎终板Modic改变发生率较腰椎低,其发生和椎间盘退变、椎间盘节段、年龄和颈椎曲度之间存在相关性,椎问盘退变是最重要的影响因素.Ⅱ型最为多见,I型次之,Ⅲ型最为少见,多发生于C3-6椎间盘.40岁以上是Modie改变易发年龄.     

Indication of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc herniation

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether lumbar disc herniation with massive extrusion and/or segmental instability can be an indicator for spinal fusion or not, by comparing the outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and discectomy alone. METHODS: One hundred seventy-four patients with PLIF and 177 patients with discectomy were retrospectively analyzed. We hypothesized two criteria for fusion: massive herniation and segmental instability. The patients were divided into four groups according to our original criteria: group F-F (n = 96) consisted of the patients who fulfilled the criteria for fusion and underwent PLIF; group nF-F (n = 78) consisted of those who did not fulfill the criteria but had PLIF; group F-nF (n = 30) consisted of those who fulfilled the criteria but underwent discectomy; group nF-nF (n = 147) comprised those who did not fulfill the criteria and underwent discectomy. Each patient was evaluated clinically and radiologically at 5 years after operation. RESULTS: Groups F-F and nF-F had significantly superior results on low back pain compared with group F-nF (F-F vs F-nF, P < 0.05; nF-F vs F-nF, P < 0.01). The frequency of additional operation at the involved level was significantly higher in group F-nF (10.0%) than in group F-F (2.0%) (P < 0.05). Postoperative instability of the adjacent segment developed in 15 cases (8.6%) in groups F-F and nF-F and in 3 cases (1.7%) in groups F-nF and nF-nF (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Lumbar disc herniation with massive herniation or segmental instability can be well treated with PLIF.     

Intra-operative identification of conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: a report of three cases

We report 3 cases of conjoined nerve root anomalies identified during micro-endoscopic discectomy (MED). Between 2009 and 2010, 61 men and 20 women aged 18 to 84 (mean, 42) years underwent MED for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation of L3-4 (n=1), L4-5 (n=44), and L5-S1 (n=36). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), myelogram, and postmyelo computed tomography did not identify the anomalies. All 3 patients were male and had type 2A S1 conjoined nerve roots, with a herniated disc at L5-S1. None of them had any preoperative pseudolocalising neurological signs, but all demonstrated stiffer positive straight leg raise sign and deterioration of the Achilles tendon reflex. Postoperatively, all 3 patients achieved excellent clinical outcomes.     

颈椎病病人颈部疼痛的影响因素分析

目的探讨引起颈椎病病人颈部疼痛的影响因素,尤其是Modic改变在颈部疼痛中所起的作用。方法回顾分析2016年9月至2019年4月于我院就诊的261例颈椎病病人,其中男136例,女125例,年龄为(51.2±10.9)岁。纳入统计的因素包括年龄、性别、身体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、吸烟史、受教育水平、颈椎曲度改变、颈椎滑脱、Modic改变、高级别椎间盘退变、椎间盘高度丢失和纤维环撕裂。通过数字化疼痛量表(numerical rating scale,NRS)评估病人的颈部疼痛程度,利用单因素分析及多因素Logistic回归分析分别计算上述因素对严重性颈部疼痛(SNP)和持续性颈部疼痛(PNP)的影响。另外,利用单因素分析及多因素Logistic回归分析计算颈椎滑脱、椎间盘退变分级、椎间盘高度丢失和纤维环撕裂对Modic改变的影响。结果共32例存在Modic改变。1型Modic改变病人的NRS评分明显高于2型(4.6±0.7 vs.3.7±1.1,P=0.003)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示颈椎后凸[OR=2.413,95%CI(1.329,5.180),P=0.009]、颈椎滑脱[OR=2.962,95%CI(1.592,5.665),P=0.001]和纤维环撕裂[OR=1.766,95%CI(1.087,2.765),P=0.021]是病人SNP的3个独立危险因素,而颈椎后凸[OR=2.738,95%CI(1.399,5.468),P=0.005]、颈椎滑脱[OR=2.565,95%CI(1.361,4.784),P=0.006]和Modic改变[OR=2.360,95%CI(1.264,4.275),P=0.010]是病人PNP的3个独立危险因素。Modic改变与椎间盘病变的回归分析提示高级别椎间盘退变[OR=2.512,95%CI(1.186,5.611),P=0.013]以及椎间盘高度丢失[OR=2.403,95%CI(1.160,5.721),P=0.025]是Modic改变的独立危险因素。结论颈椎后凸、颈椎滑脱和纤维环撕裂会加重颈椎病病人颈部疼痛的程度,而颈椎后凸、颈椎滑脱和Modic改变会延长颈椎病病人颈部疼痛的时间。此外,高级别椎间盘退变和椎间盘高度丢失是颈椎Modic改变的危险因素。