In vitro comparative antimicrobial activity of cefpimizole against clinical isolates from five medical centers.

Cefpimizole was compared with cefoperazone and cefotaxime against 6,599 clinical bacterial isolates from five medical centers. Cefoperazone and cefotaxime were both more active and provided a greater spectrum of antimicrobial coverage than cefpimizole. Some of the cefpimizole minimum concentrations inhibiting 50% of tested strains were as follows: Citrobacter freundii and Enterobacter cloacae, 16 micrograms/ml; Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2.0 micrograms/ml; Proteus mirabilis, 1.0 microgram/ml; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 16 micrograms/ml; Staphylococcus spp., 32 micrograms/ml; and the enterococci, greater than 32 micrograms/ml.     

Antimicrobial activity of cefpirome. An update compared to five third-generation cephalosporins against nearly 6000 recent clinical isolates from five medical centers

Cefpirome, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefoperazone, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone were tested against approximately 6000 fresh clinical isolates from five medical centers. For 3031 strains of Enterobacteriaceae tested, cefpirome consistently had the lowest MIC50s and lowest percentage of resistant strains. Cefpirome was also the most active agent against the 2138 Gram-positive cocci tested; Staphylococcus haemolyticus was uniformly resistant to all agents tested. Against 791 nonenteric Gram-negative bacilli, the activity of cefpirome was most comparable to that of cefoperazone and slightly less active than ceftazidime. Among the current third-generation cephalosporins, cefotaxime and cefoperazone emerged as having better overall balanced activity. Ceftazidime displayed poorest coverage against Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-positive organisms. Ceftizoxime also provided compromised coverage of staphylococci and nonenteric Gram-negative bacilli. Cefpirome remains as active as originally described in 1984 and possesses a slightly wider spectrum of activity against contemporary aerobic pathogens compared to currently marketed third-generation cephalosporins.     

In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against clinical bacterial isolates from 11 North American medical centers

This study compared the in vitro activities of the new long-half-life carbapenem ertapenem (also known as MK-0826 and L-749,345) with those of imipenem, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and ciprofloxacin against 5,558 recent clinical isolates from 11 North American medical centers. We confirmed the greater activity of ertapenem than of imipenem against the Enterobacteriaceae and the greater activity of imipenem against pseudomonads and gram-positive bacteria.     

In vitro activities of daptomycin against 2,789 clinical isolates from 11 North American medical centers

The in vitro activity of daptomycin is affected by the concentration of calcium cations in the test medium. Mueller-Hinton broth is currently adjusted to contain 10 to 12.5 mg of magnesium per liter and 20 to 25 mg of calcium per liter, but for testing of daptomycin, greater concentrations of calcium (50 mg/liter) are recommended to better resemble the normal concentration of ionized calcium in human serum. Two levels of calcium were used for broth microdilution tests of 2,789 recent clinical isolates of gram-positive bacterial pathogens. MICs of daptomycin were two- to fourfold lower when the broth contained additional calcium. For most species, however, the percentages of strains that were inhibited by 2.0 microg of daptomycin per ml were essentially identical with the two broth media. Enterococci were the important exception; i.e., 92% were inhibited when tested in calcium-supplemented broth but only 35% were inhibited by 2.0 microg/ml without the additional calcium. This type of information should be considered when selecting criteria for defining in vitro susceptibility to daptomycin.     

Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of beta-lactam antibiotics by Etest against clinical isolates from 100 medical centers in Japan (2004)

This antimicrobial resistance surveillance study was performed in 100 medical centers. The susceptibility of 9347 strains including Escherichia coli (997 strains), Klebsiella spp. (997 strains), Enterobacter spp. (988 strains), Citrobacter spp. (834 strains), indole-positive Proteae spp. (855 strains), Serratia spp. (925 strains), Acinetobacter spp. (902 strains), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (996 strains), oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (992 strains), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (861 strains) to 7 beta-lactam antibiotics, cefepime, cefpirome, ceftazidime, cefoperazone/sulbactam, imipenem and piperacillin (for gram negatives), or oxacillin (for gram positives) was tested. No strain resistant to these beta-lactams except for ceftazidime was found in oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. E. coli (16.5%) clinical isolates were resistant to piperacillin, whereas 1.5% or less (cefpirome = 1.5%) was resistant to other beta-lactams. Klebsiella spp. strains were more susceptible to imipenem (99.7%), cefepime (98.4%), and cefpirome (97.3%). Isolates of Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., indole-positive Proteae, and Serratia spp. were susceptible to imipenem, cefepime, and cefpirome, as well. Acinetobacter spp. strains were most susceptible to cefoperazone/sulbactam (0.8% resistance), imipenem (3.2%), ceftazidime (6.0%), and cefepime (7.0%) than other beta-lactam antibiotics tested. Isolates of P. aeruginosa were more susceptible to ceftazidime (9.9% resistance), cefoperazone/sulbactam (14.9%), and cefepime (11.2%) than piperacillin (15.5%), cefpirome (19.1%), and imipenem (19.3%). The percentage of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa is around 20% in clinical isolates in Japan.     

Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility for beta-lactams using the Etest method against clinical isolates from 100 medical centers in Japan (2006)

This antimicrobial resistance surveillance study was performed in 100 medical centers. Susceptibility testing (Etest; AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) of 9152 strains including Escherichia coli (991 strains), Klebsiella spp. (1000 strains), Enterobacter spp. (971 strains), Citrobacter spp. (803 strains), indole-positive Proteae spp. (834 strains), Serratia spp. (902 strains), Acinetobacter spp. (874 strains), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (992 strains), oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (984 strains), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 801 strains) was performed with 7 beta-lactams (cefepime, cefpirome, ceftazidime, cefoperazone/sulbactam, imipenem and piperacillin for Gram-negative bacteria, or oxacillin for Gram-positive bacteria). No strain resistance to these beta-lactams (except for ceftazidime) was found in oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus and CoNS. Of the E. coli clinical isolates, 17.1% were resistant to piperacillin, whereas 2.9% or less (cefpirome = 2.9%) were resistant to other beta-lactam agents. Klebsiella spp. strains were more susceptible to imipenem (99.9%), cefepime (99.2%), ceftazidime (98.6%), and cefpirome (98.3%). Isolates of Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., indole-positive Proteae, and Serratia spp. were susceptible to imipenem, cefepime, and cefpirome as well. Acinetobacter spp. strains were least resistant to cefoperazone/sulbactam (0.7% resistance), imipenem (2.6%), cefepime (6.6%), and ceftazidime (7.7%) compared with other beta-lactam antibiotics tested. Isolates of P. aeruginosa were more susceptible to ceftazidime (8.7% resistance), cefoperazone/sulbactam (9.8%), and cefepime (8.9%) than piperacillin (11.9%), cefpirome (16.2%), and imipenem (12.4%). The percentage of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa was approximately 13% in clinical isolates in Japan. The proportion of strains resistant to beta-lactam antimicrobials has been decreasing compared with data from 2004, suggesting that reduced consumption of beta-lactams has reflected the decreased rates of resistant bacterial isolates in Japan.     

Cefdinir (FK482), an orally administered cephalosporin in vitro activity comparison against recent clinical isolates from five medical centers and determination of MIC quality control guidelines.

Cefdinir, a new oral cephalosporin, was compared to cefaclor, cefadroxil, cefixime, and cefuroxime against greater than 5000 recent aerobic clinical isolates. This multicenter study revealed broad-spectrum cefdinir activity against all Enterobacteriaceae (MIC50s, 0.06-2 micrograms/ml) except Enterobacter cloacae, Morganella morganii, Proteus vulgaris, and Serratia marcescens (MIC50s, greater than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml). Oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci (MIC90s, 0.5-2 micrograms/ml), beta-hemolytic Streptococcus group B (MIC90, 0.06 micrograms/ml), and Acinetobacter lwoffii were also susceptible to cefdinir. The activity of cefdinir was similar to that of cefixime and cefuroxime against Gram-negative organisms and superior to all tested oral cephems when tested against Gram-positive cocci. None of the cephalosporins were active against oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp., enterococci, Pseudomonas spp., or Xanthomonas maltophilia. MIC quality control range guidelines were established for the strains recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards documents.     

Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline against clinical isolates from Spanish medical centers. Second multicenter study

The antimicrobial activity of tigecycline, a novel glycylcycline, was evaluated against 1102 bacterial isolates from 20 centers in Spain. The MIC of tigecycline at which 90% (MIC(90)) of the pneumococci tested were inhibited was the lowest (0.06 microg/mL) of all the antibiotics tested. The MICs of tigecycline against enterococci ranged from 0.03 to 0.125 microg/mL. All staphylococci were inhibited by < or =0.25 microg/mL of tigecycline, and 99.6% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates were inhibited by < or =2 microg/mL of tigecycline. Tigecycline demonstrated good activity against Bacteroides fragilis group organisms with an MIC(90) of 4 microg/mL. The results of this study confirm the excellent activity of tigecycline against multiresistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.     

Benchmarking the in vitro activities of moxifloxacin and comparator agents against recent respiratory isolates from 377 medical centers throughout the United States

To benchmark the activity of moxifloxacin (a newer fluoroquinolone), a U.S. study comprising 16,141 contemporary isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (5,640), Haemophilus influenzae (6,583), and Moraxella catarrhalis (3,648) referred from 377 institutions during 1998 is described. For S. pneumoniae the modal MIC and MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC(90)) for moxifloxacin were 0.12 and 0.25 microg/ml, respectively, independent of susceptibility to other drug classes, geography, or site of infection. Eleven isolates were intermediate or resistant to levofloxacin and grepafloxacin; of these isolates, 1 remained susceptible to sparfloxacin, 2 remained susceptible to moxifloxacin, and 4 remained susceptible to trovafloxacin. All 11 isolates possessed classic mutations in gyrA and/or parC known to confer reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones. Four isolates (originating from four separate states) belonging to a multidrug-resistant, fluoroquinolone-resistant clone were identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. For moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin, at least 87% of isolates demonstrated MICs > or =3 twofold concentrations below the susceptibility breakpoints, in contrast to no more than 15% for levofloxacin, grepafloxacin, and sparfloxacin. Of the isolates that were multidrug resistant (7.4%), >98% remained susceptible to moxifloxacin. The modal MIC and MIC(90) for M. catarrhalis (both 0.06 microg/ml) and for H. influenzae (both 0.03 microg/ml) were independent of beta-lactamase production. These data demonstrate the in vitro activity of moxifloxacin and establish a baseline for future studies.     

In vitro activity of ceftaroline against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered in 43 U.S. medical centers during 2010-2011

The in vitro activity of ceftaroline, a recently introduced parenteral cephalosporin, was assessed versus 1,750 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from patients with a variety of pneumococcal infections in 43 U.S. medical centers during 2010-2011. Using a breakpoint of ≤ 0.5 μg/ml for susceptibility, all of the isolates were found to be susceptible to ceftaroline. Ceftaroline MICs were consistently 16-fold lower than ceftriaxone MICs. Among the isolates characterized in this investigation, 38.9% were found to be nonsusceptible to penicillin (oral penicillin breakpoints) and 9.1% were nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone (nonmeningitis breakpoints).     

In vitro susceptibilities of 185 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to WY-49605 (SUN/SY 5555), a new oral penem, compared with those to penicillin G, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, and cefdinir.

In vitro susceptibility of 185 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to WY-49605, a new oral penem, was compared with susceptibility to penicillin G, amoxicillin with and without clavulanate, cefixime, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, and cefdinir. WY-49605 yielded MICs for 50 and 90% of the strains tested (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively) of 0.03 and 0.06, 0.125 and 0.5, and 0.5 and 1.0 micrograms/ml, respectively, against penicillin-susceptible, intermediately resistant, and fully resistant strains, respectively. The MIC50 and MIC90 for both amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate were identical and approximately 1 doubling dilution higher than those for WY-49605 and were < or = 0.06 and 0.125, 0.25 and 1.0, and 1.0 and 1.0 micrograms/ml, respectively. Cephalosporin MIC90s were all significantly higher than those of the latter three compounds for intermediately resistant and fully resistant strains.     

Molecular characterization of the beta-lactamases from clinical isolates of Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis obtained from 24 U.S. medical centers during 1994-1995 and 1997-1998

The beta-lactamases from 403 Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis clinical isolates obtained during 1994-1995 and 1997-1998 U.S. multicenter surveillance studies were characterized by isoelectric focusing. The overall prevalences of the BRO-1 and BRO-2 enzymes among beta-lactamase-positive isolates were estimated to be 97.5 and 2.5%, respectively. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ampicillin for all BRO-2-producing isolates were 相似文献   

Piperacillin/tazobactam (YTR 830) combination. Comparative antimicrobial activity against 5889 recent aerobic clinical isolates and 60 Bacteroides fragilis group strains

Piperacillin combined with tazobactam (formerly YTR 830) was tested at a ratio of 8:1 against 5889 aerobic isolates and 50 strains from the Bacteroides fragilis group. Imipenem was the most active agent tested against Enterobacteriaceae (99.3% at less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml), ceftazidime was most effective against nonenteric Gram-negative bacilli (80.7% at less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml), and piperacillin/tazobactam possessed a superior spectrum against Gram-positive cocci (92.2% at less than or equal to 16/2 micrograms/ml). Against all aerobic strains, piperacillin/tazobactam had a spectrum (90.3% at less than or equal to 16/2 micrograms/ml) comparable to imipenem (93.6% at less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml) and was distinctly greater than that of ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (73.3% at less than or equal to 16/2 micrograms/ml) and ceftazidime (75.5% at less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml). Against the B. fragilis group isolates, all piperacillin/tazobactam MICs were less than or equal to 64/8 micrograms/ml. This activity was superior to piperacillin alone (MIC:50, 8-64 micrograms/ml) and cefoxitin (MIC50, 4-64 micrograms/ml). Piperacillin/tazobactam appears to be a promising parenteral antimicrobial combination, with a spectrum effective against a wide variety of clinical pathogens.     

Comparative antimicrobial spectrum and activity of ceftibuten against clinical isolates from West Germany

The in vitro activity of a new oral cephalosporin, ceftibuten, was determined against 837 clinical isolates by agar dilution technique and compared with that of the oral cephalosporins, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefixime, cefpodoxime, and cefprozil. Against Enterobacteriaceae, ceftibuten was the most active of the compounds. Ceftibuten MIC90s were less than or equal to 0.25 micrograms/ml for most members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 0.13 microgram/ml for Haemophilus influenzae, 4 micrograms/ml for Moraxella catarrhalis, and 0.5 microgram/ml for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Ceftibuten also was active against beta-haemolytic streptococci (serogroups A, C, and G) and penicillin-susceptible strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC90, 4 micrograms/ml), but was not active against Staphylococcus spp. or the anaerobic bacteria studied. Cefpodoxime and cefuroxime were the most active of the cephalosporins against nonenteric streptococci; cefprozil and cefuroxime were the most active against staphylococci, and cefaclor demonstrated the greatest activity against some Bacteroides spp. Most strains of Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas spp., and methicillin-resistant staphylococci, as well as all strains of Clostridium difficile, were resistant to each of the cephalosporins tested.     

In vitro activities of antimicrobial combinations against clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now recommend combination therapy with ceftriaxone 250 mg plus azithromycin (AZM) 1 g as a first-line regimen for gonorrhea because the increase of Neisseria gonorrhoeae resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents. However, reports on the in vitro activity of antimicrobial combinations against clinical isolates of N. gonorrhoeae are very rare. In the present study, a checkerboard method was utilized to examine the in vitro activity of ceftriaxone (CTRX), cefodizime (CDZM), spectinomycin (SPCM), or gentamicin (GM) in combination with AZM against 25 clinical isolates of N. gonorrhoeae. The SPCM + AZM combination demonstrated the lowest mean fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) of 0.69, followed by the CDZM + AZM combination (mean FICI, 0.75), the CTRX + AZM combination (mean FICI, 0.81), and the GM + AZM combination (mean FICI, 0.83). Additivity/indifference effect was detected for the SPCM + AZM combination, the CDZM + AZM combination, the CTRX + AZM combination, and the GM + AZM combination, against 96 %, 72 %, 92 %, and 100 % of the isolates, respectively. There was no antagonism for any of the antimicrobial combinations against the 25 N. gonorrhoeae isolates. These results suggest that the antimicrobial combinations may be worthy of clinical evaluation as an alternative regimen for gonococcal infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant strains.     

Comparative activities of piperacillin and tazobactam against clinical isolates of Legionella spp.

We evaluated the in vitro activity of piperacillin alone or in combination with the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam against clinical isolates of Legionella species. At an inoculum of approximately 10(4) CFU, tazobactam, piperacillin, and the 8:1 combination had equivalent activities against Legionella spp. At an approximately 10-fold higher inoculum, the following results were obtained, expressed as MICs for 50 and 90% of strains tested (MIC range): piperacillin, 4 and 16 (0.25 to 32) micrograms/ml; tazobactam, 0.5 and 1 (0.125 to 2) micrograms/ml; and piperacillin-tazobactam (expressed in terms of MIC of piperacillin) 0.5 and 1 (0.03 to 2) micrograms/ml. Tazobactam alone and the combination with piperacillin were more active than piperacillin alone at the higher inoculum.     

Comparative in-vitro activities of A-56268 (TE-031) and erythromycin against 306 clinical isolates

The inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal (MBC) activities of a new macrolide A-56268 (TE-031) against 306 clinical aerobic bacterial isolates was compared with that of erythromycin. The MIC90/MBC90 ratios for A-56268 were: Campylobacter jejuni 4/16, Haemophilus influenzae 8/8-16, H. parainfluenzae 8/8-16, Legionella pneumophila 0.06/0.5, methicillin-sensitive isolates of Staphylococcus aureus 0.5/1, and coagulase negative staphylococci 1/8, methicillin resistant isolates of Staph. aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci greater than 16/ greater than 16, Streptococcus pneumoniae 0.06/0.125, streptococcus Group A 0.06/2-4, streptococcus Group B 0.06/8- greater than 16, streptococcus Groups C and G 0.125/8 and Str. faecalis 4/64. Compared with erythromycin, A-56268 had greater inhibitory and bactericidal activity against isolates of L. pneumophila, with an MIC90 16-fold less and an MBC90 eight-fold less than that of erythromycin. Except for enterococci, A-56268 showed inhibitory activity equal to or greater than that of penicillin G against isolates of streptococci and an MIC two-fold less than that of erythromycin. For other strains tested, the inhibitory and bactericidal activities of A-56268 and erythromycin were similar. The clinical importance of the differences between these two macrolides will depend on the pharmacokinetic and tissue penetration properties of the new compound.     

In vitro activities of antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates of Flavimonas oryzihabitans obtained from patients with cancer.

We evaluated the in vitro activities of 21 different antimicrobial agents against nine clinical isolates of Flavimonas oryzihabitans obtained from patients with cancer. The organisms were susceptible to most agents commonly used for the empiric therapy (aminoglycosides, ureidopenicillins, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems) and prevention of infections (quinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) in this patient population.     

Comparative in vitro activities of carbapenem antimicrobial agents against 264 penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from Korea

We compared in vitro activities of carbapenems against 264 penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) isolates. The MIC(50)/MIC(90) (microg/mL) values of imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, and panipenem were 1/1, 0.25/0.25, 0.25/0.5, and 0.125/0.25, respectively. The susceptibility rates to imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem were 0%, 85.2%, and 99.6%, respectively. Compared with imipenem and meropenem, ertapenem and panipenem had better in vitro activities against PRSP.