Mammography in a mobile setting: remaining barriers

This study examined the barriers to undergoing mammography perceived by a group of women with ready access to reduced-cost screening mammography in a mobile van at the workplace. The subject sample comprised women who made appointments for mammography at the Susan G. Komen Mobile Breast Center in Dallas. Women who underwent mammography and women who made appointments but did not undergo the examination were asked to complete a survey examining potential barriers to undergoing mammography. The group of patients surveyed were, as a whole, well educated, affluent, less than 50 years of age, and knowledgeable about breast cancer. Compliant women were more likely to have previously undergone mammography (P less than .001), to have been influenced by their physician's advice to undergo mammography (P less than .005), and to be influenced by the media than were noncompliant women (P less than .005). These findings may be useful in developing strategies to increase mammographic screening in a self-referred population.     

DIMA enlargement mammography in microcalcifications: a prospective study with ROC analysis

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the four-fold magnification mammography (direct magnification, DIMA) technique would perform better than conventional 1.5-fold magnification mammography in the differentiation of breast microcalcifications into benign and malignant. Fifty patients with non-palpable microcalcifications detected by mammography were examined immediately prior to surgical biopsy using both a conventional (1.5-fold) and the DIMA (fourfold) magnification mammography techniques. The microcalcifications were classified by five experienced radiologists using morphological criteria. A receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of both techniques in assessing malignancy was then carried out. The DIMA mammography technique was slightly but non-significantly superior to the conventional method in detecting malignancy (p > 0.05). Coarse granular and pleomorphic calcifications were detected more frequently with the DIMA technique. Coarse calcifications were significantly more frequently associated with histologically benign findings, whereas fine granular calcifications were significantly more likely to be malignant lesions. Assessment of malignancy associated with microcalcifications using morphological criteria is not significantly improved by mammography techniques with higher magnification.     

Screen-film mammography versus xeromammography in the detection of breast cancer

There are two common methods of obtaining high-quality screening mammography: screen-film mammography (more simply, mammography) using a dedicated unit, and xeromammography. We studied the accuracy of the two techniques in detecting breast cancer by a retrospective study, analysing accuracy of interpretation in cases where both mammography and xeromammography were performed. Seventy-six patients were considered with 86 biopsies and mammograms resulting in detection of 32 cancers and 54 benign lesions. There was no difference in accuracy of interpretation between mammography and xeromammography. The sensitivities were: mammography 0.91, xeromammography 0.88. The specificities were: mammography 0.63, xeromammography 0.75. We conclude that both modalities are comparable in detecting cancer when optimal technique and experienced personnel are used.     

Relationship between the arterial calcification detected in mammography and coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE: Arterial calcification is frequently encountered in mammography. The frequency of breast arterial calcification (BAC) increases with increasing age. Studies have shown that BAC is seen more frequently among the people who are under the risk of coronary artery diseases (CAD) such as diabetes and hypertension. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between the arterial calcification detected in mammography and the CAD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Screening mammography was performed in 123 women above the age of 40 years who had been examined with coronary angiography for the evaluation of CAD. The presence of BAC, number of affected vessels, and the distribution of calcification in the vessel wall were evaluated in the mammography. Subjects were questioned in terms of the cardiovasculary risk factors. The severity of CAD was evaluated according to the Gensini scoring. In addition, the number of blood vessels with stenosis of more than 50% was used as the vascular score. The correlation between Gensini and the vascular scores, and BAC was statistically evaluated using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Eighty (65%) of 123 patients had CAD. BAC was detected in the mammography of 49 (39.8%) subjects. The ages and duration of menopause of the cases with BAC were significantly higher than those without BAC (p<0.001). There was an almost significant correlation between the BAC and Gensini scores (p=0.059). There was a significant increase in the frequency of BAC among subjects with more than two vessels with stenosis (p=0.033). CONCLUSION: Frequency of BAC increases with increasing age. BAC is also frequently seen in subjects having severe coronary artery disease. Although increasing age may be a factor increasing the frequency of BAC, BAC may also be an indicator of CAD. Therefore, the mentioning of arterial calcification in mammography reports may be important in warning the clinician in terms of CAD.     

Barriers and incentives for choosing to specialise in mammography– A survey of Australian undergraduate diagnostic radiography students

IntroductionThere is a projected shortage of radiographers working in breast screening in Australia. This study aimed to examine the perceived barriers and potential incentives among current undergraduate diagnostic radiography students to train, specialise and work in mammography.MethodsA survey was undertaken to assess students' experience of six modalities during both University study and clinical practice. Students were asked to rank their priority of which they would want to specialise and if training and working in mammography was an option.ResultsFrom 248 students invited to participate, 101 students replied to the survey. Students indicated that they had been taught all modalities, however not all students had experienced them on clinical placement. Most students had observed or performed ultrasound (US) (90%, 90%), Computed Tomography (CT) (97%, 75%) and fluoroscopy (80%, 52%), though very few had experience of mammography (55%, 8%). US, CT, and MRI were the modalities that most students would like to specialise in. Male students reported being discriminated against working in mammography as this is “female only” work.ConclusionStudents have more clinical access to the major modalities of US, CT and MRI, and this appears to be a major factor into why student wish to specialise in these modalities. Role extension and higher wages were given as possible incentives that would make specialising in Mammography more appealing. The gender divide may have to be bridged to enable crucial recruitment as male students feel discriminated against.     

Mammography screening: successes and problems in implementing widespread use in the United States

Deterrents to the use of screening mammography include perceived risks of radiation, perceived "unnecessary" biopsies and overdiagnosis, and high cost. In addition, physicians and patients have attitudinal barriers that do not reflect objective realities. Professional and public education efforts are needed to enable women and their physicians to develop a more sophisticated understanding of the usefulness of screening mammography and the role played by the radiologist. As part of their efforts to increase the implementation of screening mammography, the American College of Radiology has developed a Mammography Accreditation Program for radiological facilities and has produced a free Mammography Resource Kit for radiologists, while the American Cancer Society has undertaken the support of local and national campaigns to establish screening programs at reduced cost. Both organizations continue to strive in partnership to increase the acceptance of screening throughout the United States.     

A preliminary study on measurement of muscle activity during mammography positioning

This study focused on measuring examinees' muscle activities during mammography positioning using surface electromyography. Muscle activities were measured in three women (40-50s) in two-view mammography (MLO: mediolateral oblique, CC: craniocaudal). The muscles measured were the sternocleidomastoid, biceps, trapezius, and gastrocnemius, selected based on the visual analogue scale reported by Sharp et al. We used a multi-purpose portable bio-amplifier (Polymate AP1000) to assess the muscle activities. The results showed that the trapezius in right MLO and sternocleidomastoid in right CC were active in all three subjects. This suggests that the muscles directly related to mammography positioning are highly active. In addition, the gastrocnemius was active throughout the mammography. The biceps and gastrocnemius were also active in at least one of the three women. We believe that quantitative assessment of muscle activities during mammography positioning will contribute to the improvement of pain-reduction programs in mammography.     

Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms

OBJECTIVE: We examined the age-specific sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in symptomatic women to determine the age below which sonography may be the more accurate imaging test, which may guide the choice of initial breast imaging examination based on the woman's age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty subjects were sampled from all women consecutively attending a symptomatic breast clinic between 1994 and 1996 and ranging in age from 25 to 55 years. We included all 240 women shown to have breast cancer (thus avoiding selection bias) and 240 age-matched women shown not to have cancer. Mammograms and sonograms were prospectively interpreted independently and without knowledge of age by two radiologists in a blinded manner, with a third radiologist arbitrating disagreements. Sensitivity and specificity of each imaging test in relation to age were examined using logistic regression modeling, and accuracy was compared using the chi-square test for paired proportions. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of each test were not linearly associated with age; however, the sensitivity of mammography increased substantially in women older than 50 years. Sonographic sensitivity of 81.7% was not significantly greater than mammographic sensitivity of 75.8% (chi(2)(1) = 2.06, p = 0.15). However, in women 45 years old or younger, the sensitivity of sonography was 13.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.1-24.3%) greater than that of mammography. The specificity of both tests was approximately 88.0%. CONCLUSION: These data show that sonography is the more accurate imaging test in women 45 years old or younger who present with breast symptoms and may be an appropriate initial imaging examination.     

An investigation of radiographers' and radiologists' perceptions and attitudes in Kuwait towards extending radiographers’ role in mammography

IntroductionKuwait has a shortage of radiologists, especially in mammography, resulting in increased workload and longer waiting times for women receiving imaging investigations. This study looked at how radiographers and radiologists perceived radiographers’ role extension (RE) in mammography, and whether this could reduce radiologist workload, thereby improving patient service and waiting times.MethodsA single case study design with 10 radiographers (mammographers) and 10 radiologists was undertaken across multiple sites: hospitals, screening clinics and specialist centres in Kuwait. Data included individual semi-structured interviews, documentary analysis and field notes. Perceptions were examined under a theoretical framework, Abbotts’ System of Professions.ResultsTwo main themes were identified, firstly in examining the current role of radiographers in mammography and areas of interest for extending role, this highlighted insufficient knowledge of the concept. The second focused on in-depth understanding of drivers and barriers to RE in mammography, both groups opposed radiographers performing extended tasks without radiologist supervision.ConclusionRadiologists and radiographers' attitudes were influenced by concepts of professional identity and professional identity formation. Insufficient professional knowledge negatively affected the radiographers' readiness to undertake RE in mammography. Radiologists are reluctant to blur boundaries, enabling them to maintain and control jurisdiction of their own profession and that of radiographers, thereby, as discussed in Abbott's theory, limiting impact on workload or waiting times.Implications for practiceWhilst RE is limited, to improve workload and patient waiting times, setting up an educational programme for radiographers specialising in mammography would be an important step to extending the radiographers' role. The study highlighted a need to educate radiographers to undertake breast ultrasound and amend policy to introduce training programmes for radiographers. Radiographer rotation across the various radiographic modalities negatively affected radiographers’ performance, placing well-trained radiographers permanently within the mammography department should improve experience and overall skills.     

Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study

PURPOSE: To compare screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in a population-based screening program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Full-field digital and screen-film mammography were performed in 3,683 women aged 50-69 years. Two standard views of each breast were acquired with each modality. Images underwent independent double reading with use of a five-point rating scale for probability of cancer. Recall rates and positive predictive values were calculated. Cancer detection rates determined with both modalities were compared by using the McNemar test for paired proportions. Retrospective side-by-side analysis for conspicuity of cancers was performed by an external independent radiologist group with experience in both modalities. RESULTS: In 3,683 cases, 31 cancers were detected. Screen-film mammography depicted 28 (0.76%) malignancies, and full-field digital mammography depicted 23 (0.62%) malignancies. The difference between cancer detection rates was not significant (P =.23). The recall rate for full-field digital mammography (4.6%; 168 of 3,683 cases) was slightly higher than that for screen-film mammography (3.5%; 128 of 3,683 cases). The positive predictive value based on needle biopsy results was 46% for screen-film mammography and 39% for full-field digital mammography. Side-by-side image comparison for cancer conspicuity led to classification of 19 cancers as equal for probability of malignancy, six cancers as slightly better demonstrated at screen-film mammography, and six cancers as slightly better demonstrated at full-field digital mammography. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in cancer detection rate between screen-film and full-field digital mammography. Cancer conspicuity was equal with both modalities. Full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading is comparable to screen-film mammography in population-based screening.     

Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography

Digital mammography is more and more replacing conventional mammography. Initial concerns about an inferior image quality of digital mammography have been largely overcome and recent studies even show digital mammography to be superior in women with dense breasts, while at the same time reducing radiation exposure. Nevertheless, an important limitation of digital mammography remains: namely, the fact that summation may obscure lesions in dense breast tissue. However, digital mammography offers the option of so-called advanced applications, and two of these, contrast-enhanced mammography and tomosynthesis, are promising candidates for improving the detection of breast lesions otherwise obscured by the summation of dense tissue. Two techniques of contrast-enhanced mammography are available: temporal subtraction of images acquired before and after contrast administration and the so-called dual-energy technique, which means that pairs of low/high-energy images acquired after contrast administration are subtracted. Tomosynthesis on the other hand provides three-dimensional information on the breast. The images are acquired with different angulations of the X-ray tube while the object or detector is static. Various reconstruction algorithms can then be applied to the set of typically nine to 28 source images to reconstruct 1-mm slices with a reduced risk of obscuring pathology. Combinations of both advanced applications have only been investigated in individual experimental studies; more advanced software algorithms and CAD systems are still in their infancy and have only undergone preliminary clinical evaluation.     

Provider efforts to increase mammography screening

This article examines barriers to mammography screening and reviews the professional literature on provider interventions to increase screening. Interventions appropriate for radiologic technologists are evaluated and discussed in an effort to expand R.T.s' role in improving mammography screening rates.     

X线及MRI对聚丙烯酰胺凝胶隆胸后乳腺病变诊断价值的评价与比较

目的对聚丙烯酰胺凝胶(PAG)注射式隆胸术后,出现并发症或合并乳腺其他病变的X线与MRI的诊断价值进行评估。方法回顾性分析26例PAG隆胸术后钼靶X线与MRI的影像表现。结果钼靶X线及MRI能显示充填物位置、形态,合并乳腺病变4例,X线全部漏诊,MRI能检出病灶。结论钼靶X线是PAG隆胸术后普查、随访的首选方法,但出现并发症或者合并乳腺病变时,MRI具有无法比拟的优越性,在临床诊断与治疗中发挥了重要作用。     

Males in mammography – A narrative review of the literature

ObjectiveThere is a worldwide shortage of radiographers qualified to perform mammography. One solution is the employment of male radiographers. This literature review aims to assess the scope of information available that covers the prospect of males being employed in a breast screening setting. The review specifically focuses on the incidence of males employed as mammographers, training options and client perceptions of males performing breast imaging.Key findingsSome countries employ male mammographers, though this is limited. There is contradictory information regarding the education of male radiography students in mammography. Several studies have indicated that clients of breast screening services would be open to males performing mammographic procedures, while others have reported strong opposition. The client's level of education, marital status and ethnicity affected their perception.ConclusionThe review has shown that the employment of male radiographers in mammography may work better in some countries and in some subgroup of clients than others. The review has also highlighted some of the barriers that needs to be overcome if the widespread inclusion of men in mammography were to be successfully implemented. These include the use of chaperones and providing client choice in the gender of radiographer.     

Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of conventional mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced fast 3D gradient-echo (GRE) MRI regarding the detection and characterization of breast lesions relative to histopathologic analysis and to assess the results of a combined evaluation of both methods. fifty consecutive patients with 63 histopathologically verified breast lesions underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced GRE MRI in addition to routine conventional mammography. All lesions were classified by both methods on a five-point scale as benign or malignant, and the results were correlated to histopathology. Conventional mammography and dynamic MRI yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 82 and 64 %, and 92 and 76 %, respectively. The difference between the results was statistically not significant (p > 0.05) with areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves of 0.807 for mammography and 0.906 for MR imaging. Combination of the results of both methods slightly increased the sensitivity for detection of breast cancer to 95 % but decreased specificity to 52 %. In this selected patient subset, including only patients referred for excisional biopsy, contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI proved more sensitive and specific than conventional mammography regarding the detection of malignancy. While a combination of both methods yields a slightly improved sensitivity, specificity is vastly reduced. Received 5 May 1997; Revision received 14 July 1997; Accepted 7 August 1997     

Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG.

Early detection of breast cancer is crucial for efficient and effective treatment. We have developed an instrument for positron emission mammography (PEM) called PEM-I that performs high-resolution metabolic imaging of breast cancer. Images of glucose metabolism are obtained after injection of 75 MBq FDG. The PEM detectors are integrated into a conventional mammography system, allowing acquisition of the emission images immediately after the mammogram, without subject repositioning, and accurate coregistration of images from the 2 modalities. In this article, we present the results of the first clinical pilot study with the instrument. METHODS: Sixteen subjects (age range, 34-76 y) were studied. All subjects were nondiabetic, nonpregnant, and without a history of cancer. They had recently been found to have suggestive mammography findings or a palpable breast mass and underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy within 2 wk of the study. Results from the PEM study were compared with those from mammography and pathology. A PEM test was classified positive (indicating the presence of cancer) if significant focal uptake was seen in the image or if the counting rate in the breast with suggestive findings was significantly higher than in the contralateral breast. RESULTS: Of the 16 subjects studied, 14 were evaluable. Ten cancerous tumors and 4 benign tumors were confirmed by pathologic examination after complete removal of the tumor. PEM correctly detected the presence of disease in 8 of 10 subjects. Findings were false-negative in 2 instances and false-positive in none, giving the instrument 80% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 86% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that PEM can offer a noninvasive method for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Metabolic images from PEM contain unique information not available from conventional morphologic imaging techniques and aid in expeditiously establishing the diagnosis of cancer. In all subjects, the PEM images were of diagnostic quality, with an imaging time of 2-5 min.     

Qualität digitaler Mammogramme

Digital imaging in mammography is becoming more and more accepted using both computed (CR) and direct radiography (DR). These techniques will soon be used in screening programs. Therefore, quality assurance for this technique is indispensable. The relevance of the current regulations, such as EPOC and the German QS-RL was investigated. For the investigation, a breast phantom and appropriate software were developed. Both were tested using digital mammography systems from six manufactures. Quality assurance parameters (such as contrast to noise ratio and contrast resolution) were calculated from these data sets. The results should be considered in future standards for mammography (IEC respectively DIN). In addition, this type of test procedure is time saving and enables a reduction in test devices, i. e. in costs.     

Impact of Primary Care Physician Interaction on Longitudinal Adherence to Screening Mammography Across Different Racial/Ethnic Groups

PurposeRegular contact with a primary care physician (PCP) is associated with increased participation in screening mammography. Older studies suggested that PCP interaction may have a smaller effect on screening mammography uptake among racial and ethnic minorities compared with whites, but there is limited contemporary evidence about the effect of PCP interaction on screening mammography uptake across different racial and ethnic groups. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between PCP contact and longitudinal adherence with screening mammography guidelines over a 10-year period across different racial/ethnic groups.MethodsThis HIPAA-compliant and institutional review board–approved retrospective single-institution study included women between the ages of 50 and 64 years who underwent screening mammography in the calendar year of 2005. The primary outcome of interest was adherence to recommended screening mammography guidelines (yes or no) at each 2-year interval from their index screening mammographic examination in 2005 until 2015. Patients were defined as having a high level of PCP interaction if their PCPs were listed in the electronic medical record within the top three providers with whom the patients had the most visits during the study period. Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the effect of high PCP interaction on screening mammography adherence while adjusting for correlated observations and patient characteristics.ResultsPatients in the high PCP interaction group had increased longitudinal adherence to recommended screening mammography (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-1.73; P < .001). This was observed in stratified analyses for all self-reported racial groups, including white (adjusted OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.36-1.68; P < .001), black (adjusted OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.31-2.86; P = .001), Hispanic (adjusted OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.27-2.87; P = .002), Asian (adjusted OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.01-2.39; P = .045), and other (adjusted OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.32-3.56; P = .002), with no evidence of effect modification by race/ethnicity (P = .342). Medicaid (adjusted OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31-0.53) and self-pay or other (adjusted OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.56) insurance categories were associated with decreased longitudinal adherence to recommended screening mammography (P < .001 for both).ConclusionsHigh levels of PCP interaction result in similar improvements in longitudinal screening mammography adherence for all racial/ethnic minority groups. Future efforts will require targeted outreach to assist Medicaid and uninsured patient populations overcome barriers to screening mammography adherence.     

Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists

PURPOSE: To evaluate performance parameters for radiologists in a practice of breast imaging specialists and general diagnostic radiologists who interpret a large series of consecutive screening and diagnostic mammographic studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data (ie, patient age; family history of breast cancer; availability of previous mammograms for comparison; and abnormal interpretation, cancer detection, and stage 0-I cancer detection rates) were derived from review of mammographic studies obtained from January 1997 through August 2001. The breast imaging specialists have substantially more initial training in mammography and at least six times more continuing education in mammography, and they interpret 10 times more mammographic studies per year than the general radiologists. Differences between specialist and general radiologist performances at both screening and diagnostic examinations were assessed for significance by using Student t and chi(2) tests. RESULTS: The study involved 47,798 screening and 13,286 diagnostic mammographic examinations. Abnormal interpretation rates for screening mammography (ie, recall rate) were 4.9% for specialists and 7.1% for generalists (P <.001); and for diagnostic mammography (ie, recommended biopsy rate), 15.8% and 9.9%, respectively (P <.001). Cancer detection rates at screening mammography were 6.0 cancer cases per 1,000 examinations for specialists and 3.4 per 1,000 for generalists (P =.007); and at diagnostic mammography, 59.0 per 1,000 and 36.6 per 1,000, respectively (P <.001). Stage 0-I cancer detection rates at screening mammography were 5.3 cancer cases per 1,000 examinations for specialists and 3.0 per 1,000 for generalists (P =.012); and at diagnostic mammography, 43.9 per 1,000 and 27.0 per 1,000, respectively (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Specialist radiologists detect more cancers and more early-stage cancers, recommend more biopsies, and have lower recall rates than general radiologists.