Phase II clinical trial of second-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: AVASIRI trial

Objective

FOLFIRI is a standard chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Although some studies have shown its efficacy in combination with bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy, there are no data to support FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with this form of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI and bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

Eligible patients were ??20?years old, previously treated (except with irinotecan [CPT-11] and bevacizumab), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2, and adequate organ function. Twenty-five eligible patients received FOLFIRI with bevacizumab at a dose of 10?mg/kg given intravenously on day 1. All therapy was administered every 2?weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the response rate.

Results

Twenty-five patients were enrolled between February 2008 and March 2009. The median age was 62 (range 38?C73) years, the male/female distribution was 20/5, 16 patients had performance status 0 and 9 had performance status 1, and the proportion of patients who were oxaliplatin pretreated/untreated was 16/9. The overall response rate was 32% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 17.0?C50.4%), with 8 patients showing partial responses, 15 with stable disease, and 2 with disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 11.6?months (95% CI: 6.9?C16.4). Median overall survival was 21.4?months (95% CI: 12.0?C30.8). The grade 3/4 adverse events with treatment were neutropenia (64%), leukopenia (16%), diarrhea (8%), anorexia (8%), and febrile neutropenia (8%). The bevacizumab-related grade 3/4 adverse event was hypertension, which was observed in 12% of patients.

Conclusions

The FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen is an active, well-tolerated second-line chemotherapy treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Phase I study of intraperitoneal irinotecan in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma with peritoneal seeding

Purpose

The objectives of this phase I study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and preliminary efficacy of intraperitoneally administered irinotecan (CPT-11) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding.

Experimental design

Gastric adenocarcinoma patients with surgical biopsy proven peritoneal seeding were enrolled at the time of surgery. Prior to IP chemotherapy, patients underwent palliative gastrectomy and CAPD catheter insertion in which CPT-11 was administered on postoperative day 1. The IP CPT-11 was initiated at 50?mg/m², which was escalated to 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300?mg/m². IP CPT-11 chemotherapy was repeated every 3?weeks.

Results

Seventeen patients received a total of 56?cycles at five different CPT-11 dose levels. The DLTs were neutropenic fever, neutropenia, and diarrhea. At the dose level 2 (100?mg/m²), there were one DLTs in one of the first cohort of three patients, but no DLTs at the second cohort of this level. At the dose level 5 (250?mg/m²), two DLTs were detected in the first two patients; thus, the accrual was stopped resulting in the recommended dose of IP CPT-11 of 200?mg/m². Median progression-free survival was 8.6?months (95% CI, 5.9,11.2), and median overall survival was 15.6?months (95% CI, 8.4,22.8). Pharmacokinetic results of the study showed that the C _max of peritoneal SN-38 was achieved earlier than that of plasma SN-38.

Conclusions

Intraperitoneally administered CPT-11 was feasible and tolerable. Further, phase II study of IP CPT-11 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding is warranted.     

Area under the curve calculation of nedaplatin dose used in combination chemotherapy with irinotecan in a phase I study of gynecologic malignancies

Purpose

Although the pharmacokinetic mechanism of nedaplatin (NDP) is similar to carboplatin, the dose of NDP is typically determined by body surface area and not by the area under the curve (AUC). We conducted a phase I study to determine the AUC-calculated optimal dosage of NDP used in combination chemotherapy with irinotecan (CPT-11) for gynecologic malignancies.

Methods

A total of 15 patients who were to undergo combination chemotherapy consisting of NDP and CPT-11 were enrolled in this study. The dose of CPT-11 was administered at a fixed dose of 60?mg/m² and that of NDP was gradually increased from 8 to 12???g?h/mL (AUC). The individual dose of NDP was calculated based on cratinine clearance of the patient according following formula: Dose_NDP?=?AUC?×?CL_NDP, where CL_NDP?=?0.0738?×?creatinine clearance?+?4.47 (Ishibashi??s formula).

Results

One patient had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at level 1, and two patients suffered DLT at level 3. The dosage of NDP at AUC 12 was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose in combination chemotherapy with CPT-11, even though only two of the six patients showed DLT at level 3.

Conclusions

The recommended dosage of NDP calculated by AUC with Ishibashi??s fomula was set to AUC 10 in combination chemotherapy with CPT-11.     

Phase I/II study of irinotecan, UFT and leucovorin with hepatic arterial infusion using 5-FU in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of systemic chemotherapy with irinotecan (CPT-11), UFT and leucovorin (LV) combined with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases.

Methods

Patients were treated concurrently with escalating doses of intravenous CPT-11 (100, 120, and 140?mg/m²) on day 1 of each 14-day treatment cycle, with oral UFT (300?mg/m² per day) and LV (75?mg/body per day) on days 1?C7 of each cycle, and with HAI 5-FU (2,000?mg/week) on days 8?C14 of each cycle.

Results

Twelve patients were enrolled in the phase I study. The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Consequently, the recommended dose of CPT-11 for the phase II study was determined to be 140?mg/m². Twenty-two patients were evaluated in the phase II study. Five patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia, two experienced grade 3 anorexia, two experienced nausea, and two experienced vomiting. An overall response was observed in 19 out of 22 patients (86.4%). The median progression-free survival period was 11.2?months, and the 3-year survival rate was 50.6%. Fourteen patients (63.6%) were ultimately able to undergo a complete liver resection.

Conclusions

Chemotherapy with CPT-11 and UFT/LV combined with HAI yielded a high response rate and enabled a significant proportion of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to undergo surgical resection. Further trials are warranted.     

A phase I study of S-1 and irinotecan combination therapy in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

This phase I study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and to determine the recommended doses of the combination therapy of S-1 and irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as second-line treatment.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC who were previously treated with one chemotherapy regimen and had a performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible. CPT-11 was administered at 60 mg/m² (level 1), 80 mg/m² (level 2) on days 1 and 8, and oral S-1 was administered at 80 mg/day for body surface area (BSA) less than 1.25 m², 100 mg/day for BSA 1.25–1.5 m², and 120 mg/day for BSA more than 1.5 m² on days 1–14 every 3 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 leukocytopenia or neutropenia, grade ≥3 neutropenia with fever over 38°C, grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, or grade ≥3 major nonhematological toxicities.

Results

Nine patients were enrolled in the study. None of 3 patients enrolled in level 1 had any DLT. Of 6 patients in level 2, 2 patients had grade 3 diarrhea and one had grade 3 interstitial pneumonia. Level 1 was declared as the recommended dose.

Conclusion

The feasibility of the combination therapy of S-1 and CPT-11 was shown in the second-line setting for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The recommended dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m² combined with standard dose of S-1 for phase II trials of pretreated advanced NSCLC patients.     

Phase I trial of irinotecan and amrubicin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

We conducted a phase I trial of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, combined with amrubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) support to overcome the neutropenia associated with this particular combination. The aim was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of amrubicin combined with a fixed dose of CPT-11 and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of this combination in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) patients.

Methods

Fifteen patients with ED-SCLC were treated at 3-week intervals with amrubicin on days 1–3 plus 60?mg/m² CPT-11 on days 1 and 8. In addition, prophylactic rhG-CSF (50?μg/m²) was given from day 4 to day 21, except on the day of CPT-11 administration. Amrubicin was started at 30?mg/m² and then escalated in 5?mg/m² increments until MTD was reached.

Results

The MTD of amrubicin was 35?mg/m², since 2 of 4 patients experienced DLTs during the first cycle of treatment at the 40 mg/m² dose level. Neutropenia, neutropenic fever, ileus, and diarrhea were the DLTs. There were 13 partial responses among the 13 assessable patients, yielding an overall response rate of 100?%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.4?months and 13.4?months, respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of amrubicin and CPT-11 showed high activity against ED-SCLC with acceptable toxicity. Use of rhG-CSF allowed the dose of amrubicin to be raised 40?% above that in the original regimen (60?mg/m² CPT-11 and 25?mg/m² amrubicin).     

Clinical study of irinotecan therapy in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced colorectal cancer

The clinical efficacy and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) therapy were studied retrospectively in patients with fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced colorectal cancer. The subjects were 44 patients who were treated with CPT-11 alone or with a combination of CPT-11 and mitomycin C (MMC) at our institute from April 1999 to March 2003. CPT-11 (120-150 mg/m2) alone or CPT-11 with MMC (5 mg/m2) was administered every 2 weeks. The objective overall response rate was 11% (95% confidence interval, 3.8-25%). In 38 patients who were treated until October 2002, the median survival time was 12 months. Two-year survival rate was 13%. Grade 3 anorexia or diarrhea occurred in 6 patients (14%) and 5 patients (11%), respectively. There was no treatment-related death or early death within 30 days from the last administration of CPT-11 (+MMC). This retrospective study demonstrated the reproducible activity and safety of CPT-11 for the treatment of fluoropyrimidine-resistant advanced colorectal cancer in clinical practice.     

A randomized phase II study of biweekly irinotecan monotherapy or a combination of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (mFOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma refractory to or progressive after first-line chemotherapy

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) monotherapy and CPT-11 plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) combination (mFOLFIRI) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

A total of 59 patients were randomly assigned to either CPT-11 (150 mg/m² iv on day 1) or mFOLFIRI (CPT-11 150 mg/m² plus LV 20 mg/m² on day 1 followed by 5-FU 2,000 mg/m² over 48 h), every 2 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR).

Results

Following random assignment, 29 patients received CPT-11 and 30 patients mFOLFIRI. The ORR was 17.2 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.4–30.9] and 20.0 % (95 % CI 5.6–34.3) for the CPT-11 and mFOLFIRI arms, respectively (P = 0.525). There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival: 2.2 months (95 % CI 0.2–4.3) for CPT-11 versus 3.0 months (95 % CI 2.0–3.7) for mFOLFIRI (P = 0.481) or in median overall survival: 5.8 months (95 % CI 3.0–8.7), compared with 6.7 months (95 % CI 5.3–8.2) (P = 0.514). Grade 3/4 toxicity was observed in 21 and 28 events in the CPT-11 and mFOLFIRI arms, respectively.

Conclusions

Although this study had a small sample size and limited statistical power, CPT-11 monotherapy and mFOLFIRI appear to be equally active and tolerable as second-line chemotherapy for AGC. The addition of 5-FU/LV to CPT-11 did not significantly improve efficacy.     

Phase II study of carboplatin and pemetrexed in advanced non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer: Kyoto Thoracic Oncology Research Group Trial 0902

Background

Subgroup analyses of randomized studies have consistently shown that pemetrexed is exclusively effective in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) other than squamous cell carcinoma and the combination of pemetrexed and platinum agents is recommended for first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous NSCLC; however, there have been few prospective studies of a selected population.

Patients and methods

This was a single-arm phase II study of carboplatin and pemetrexed in Japanese patients with chemo-naive advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Patients received six cycles of pemetrexed (500?mg/m²) combined with carboplatin (area under the curve: AUC 6) every 3?weeks. Maintenance chemotherapy with pemetrexed was permitted in patients whose disease did not progress after combination chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the response rate, and secondary endpoints were safety and survival.

Results

Fifty-one patients were enrolled between November 2009 and March 2011, and 49 patients were evaluable for both safety and efficacy. All but one patient had adenocarcinoma histology. Forty-four (90?%) patients completed four cycles, and 33 (67?%) completed six cycles of chemotherapy. Partial response was achieved in 25 patients (response rate: 51?%) and stable disease in 18 patients (37?%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.3?months and 24.3?months, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 7.9?months and 24.3?months in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, and 6.3?months and 21.0?months in patients with EGFR wild type or unknown. There were no statistical differences between EGFR mutants and non-mutants for both PFS (p?=?0.09) and OS (p?=?0.23). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 16 (33?%) and 9 (18?%) patients, respectively. Non-hematologic toxicities were generally mild, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions

The combination of carboplatin and pemetrexed was safe and effective in advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Although the sample size was small, our results indicate that pemetrexed is a key drug for advanced non-squamous NSCLC, irrespective of the EGFR mutation status (UMIN-CTR number 000002451).     

Possible use of combination chemotherapy with mitomycin C and methotrexate for metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes

Background

Most patients with breast cancer need anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant setting, and an increasing number of them receive taxanes either in this setting or as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, no standard chemotherapy has been fully established for MBC patients pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 48 patients with MBC who had been treated with chemotherapy combining mitomycin C and methotrexate (MMC/MTX), following treatment with anthracycline and taxanes. MMC was given at a dose of 8 mg/m² on day 1, and MTX of 60 mg/m² on day 1 and day 15. The cycle was repeated every 4 weeks.

Results

There were 11 partial responses (24%). The median time to progression was 4.8 months. The response rate of liver metastasis was 31%. Thrombocytopenia (grade 3) was observed in five patients (10%). Other toxicity was mild and manageable.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that MMC/MTX could be an effective subsequent treatment for patients whose MBC has been pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes.     

Effects of bevacizumab on plasma concentration of irinotecan and its metabolites in advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving FOLFIRI with bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy

Purpose

Bevacizumab (BV) prolongs the survival of colorectal cancer patients when combined with irinotecan (CPT-11)-based regimens. In the AVF2107g study, the area under the curve (AUC) ratio for bolus CPT-11/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (IFL) with the BV arm to bolus IFL with placebo indicated that SN-38 concentrations may have been increased in subjects receiving BV. However, the mechanism underlying such increase remains unclear, and the difference might be caused by an imbalance between the two arms and a possible inter-subject variability of CPT-11 metabolism. Within-subject comparisons were used to evaluate the effect of BV on advanced colorectal cancer patients when administered with the FOLFIRI regimen as second-line chemotherapy.

Methods

Ten advanced colorectal cancer patients received the FOLFIRI regimen every 2 weeks. At cycle 1, BV was administered following FOLFIRI administration to allow baseline pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of CPT-11 and its metabolites. From cycle 2, BV was administered just before FOLFIRI administration. Plasma samples were collected under the same condition (at cycle 3).

Results

There were no significant differences in the C _max and AUC_0-∞ of CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G between cycle 1 (without BV) and cycle 3 (with BV). PK parameters of CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G were not significantly affected by BV. There were no significant differences in the changes in the AUC ratio of CPT-11 to SN-38 between cycles 1 and 3, as well as in the ratio of SN-38 to SN-38G.

Conclusion

BV does not affect the plasma concentration of CPT-11 and its metabolites on FOLFIRI regimen.     

Combination therapy consisting of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and docetaxel as an active treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma

Background

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine, carboplatin, and docetaxel (GCD) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) as a phase II trial.

Materials and methods

Patients with metastatic or locally advanced unresectable UC were eligible for this trial. All enrolled patients were considered to be “unfit??for cisplatin-based chemotherapy, or to have methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (MVAC)-refractory UC. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of gemcitabine 1000?mg/m² on days 1 and 8, and carboplatin (with a target area under the curve of 5) and docetaxel 70?mg/m² on day 1; this was repeated every 21?days.

Results

Thirty-five patients were enrolled, with a median age of 68?years. A total of 89 cycles were administered (median, 2 cycles). Major toxicities were Grade 3/4 neutropenia in 28 (80.0%) patients and Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 18 (51.5%). An objective response rate (ORR) was 11 of 21 patients (52.4%), including a complete response in 1 (4.8%). The median overall survival (OS) was 13.1?months (1-year survival rate, 60%) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.0?months. Among 16 patients who had previously received MVAC, the ORR, the median PFS, the median OS and 1-year survival rate was 56.3%, 5.0?months, 12.6?months and 54%, respectively.

Conclusions

GCD chemotherapy is active and well tolerated as a first- or second-line therapy for patients with advanced UC. Response rate, duration and survival did not differ between those with and without a history of MVAC treatment.     

Chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and docetaxel in the treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

Purpose

To assess the antitumor activity and toxicity of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and docetaxel (GCD) regimen in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Patient and methods

Chemotherapy-na?ve patients, aged ??70?years with measurable or evaluable disease and a performance status (PS) of 0?C2 were treated with sequential cisplatin 80?mg/m² (d1), gemcitabine 1,100?mg/m² (d1 and d14), and docetaxel 80?mg/m² (d14) every 28?days.

Results

Sixty patients with an ECOG PS of 0?C2 were enroled. Most (71.7%) patients had stage IV disease. A median number of 4 chemotherapy cycles per patient (range, 1?C9) was administered. Eight (13.3%) patients achieved a CR and 16 (26.7%) a partial response (PR) (intention-to-treat: ORR 40%; 95% CI 27.6?C52.4%). Thirteen (21.7%) and 23 (38.3%) patients experienced stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) was 7.7?months (range, 0.7?C43.4), and the median overall survival 21.4?months (range, 0.7?C68.6). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 27 (45%) patients and grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in five (8.3%). Three (5%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Severe non-haematological toxicity was infrequent.

Conclusions

The GCD combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with chemotherapy-naive locally advanced or metastatic TCC and merits to be further investigated.     

Second-line chemotherapy with Capecitabine (Xeloda) and Docetaxel (Taxotere) in previously treated, unresectable adenocarcinoma of pancreas: the final results of a phase II trial

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the docetaxel and capecitabine combination in patients with previously treated, unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Patients and Methods

Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, pre-treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, were treated with capecitabine (800?mg/m² orally, twice a day for 14?days) and docetaxel (75?mg/m² i.v, on day1), every 3?weeks. The primary end-point was overall response rate (RR).

Results

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study; 93.6% of them had a performance status (PS) of 0?C1 and 96.8% had stage IV disease. Patients received a median of 4 cycles/patient, and the main reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression. Partial response was observed in three (9.7%) patients, stable disease in seven (22.6%) (disease control rate: 32.3%, 95% CI: 15.80?C48.71%) and disease progression in 21 (67.6%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4?months (95% CI: 1.6?C3.13) and the median overall survival (OS) was 6.3?months (95% CI: 3.38?C9.23); the estimated 1-year survival rate was 14.7%. Grade III/IV neutropenia occurred in 10 (32.2%) patients and febrile neutropenia in one patient. Other severe non-hematologic toxicities were mild and manageable. After 2 chemotherapy cycles, pain control occurred in 20% of patients and stabilization of body weight in 40%.

Conclusion

The combination of docetaxel/capecitabine may confer good disease control associated with improvement of quality of life as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

A phase I/II study of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy plus curcumin for patients with gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer

Purpose

Curcumin, a plant-derived natural polyphenol, could be a promising anti-cancer drug and shows synergic effects with cytotoxic agents. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of combination therapy using curcumin with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Methods

Gemcitabine-resistant patients with pancreatic cancer received 8?g oral curcumin daily in combination with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was safety for phase I and feasibility of oral curcumin for phase II study.

Results

Twenty-one patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the phase I study and oral curcumin 8?g/day was selected as the recommended dose for the phase II study. No patients were withdrawn from this study because of the intolerability of curcumin, which met the primary endpoint of the phase II study, and the median compliance rate of oral curcumin was 100% (Range 79?C100%). Median survival time after initiation of curcumin was 161?days (95% confidence interval 109?C223?days) and 1-year survival rate was 19% (4.4?C41.4%). Plasma curcumin levels ranged from 29 to 412?ng/ml in five patients tested.

Conclusions

Combination therapy using 8?g oral curcumin daily with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was safe and feasible in patients with pancreatic cancer and warrants further investigation into its efficacy.     

Down-regulation of lipids transporter ABCA1 increases the cytotoxicity of Nitidine

Purpose

This study examined the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan (CPT-11), active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) amrubicin (AMR), and active metabolite amrubicinol (AMR-OH) after intravenous administration of this combination therapy in rats.

Methods

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with 10 mg/kg CPT-11 with 10 mg/kg AMR. AMR, AMR-OH, CPT-11, SN-38 and SN-38G were measured in plasma, bile, and tissues using high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results

Co-administration of CPT-11 resulted in a significant decrease in plasma concentrations and area under the curves (AUC) of AMR-OH compared with treatment with AMR alone. On the other hand, co-administration of AMR resulted in a slight increase in the initial plasma concentration of SN-38; however, there were no differences in AUC values in CPT-11 and SN-38. The cumulative biliary excretion curves of AMR, CPT-11, and their active metabolites were not changed. CPT-11 inhibited the conversion of AMR to AMR-OH in rat cytosolic fractions.

Conclusions

CPT-11 did not affect the pharmacokinetic of AMR but decreased the plasma concentration of AMR-OH and might affect the formation of AMR-OH from AMR in hepatocytes.     

Efficacy of weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to docetaxel-based chemotherapy

Background

Only partial cross-resistance between docetaxel and paclitaxel has been demonstrated in breast and ovarian cancers. Whether weekly paclitaxel is effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to docetaxel-based chemotherapy remains unclear, and we aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel in such patients.

Methods

Patients who had received docetaxel-based regimens were assigned to the prior-docetaxel group, and those who had never received docetaxel were designated as the non-docetaxel group. Paclitaxel at 80?mg/m² was administered by intravenous infusion in all patients, and this was repeated weekly for 3?weeks out of 4.

Results

Between April 2006 and June 2011, 65 patients were studied: 26 in the prior-docetaxel group and 39 patients were non-docetaxel group. The median age, gender, performance status, histological type, history of gastrectomy, and the locations and numbers of metastatic sites did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the prior-docetaxel group, the response rate (RR) was 14.2% (3/21) among patients with measurable lesions, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 79?days [95% confidence interval (CI), 47–135?days], and overall survival (OS) was 123?days (95% CI, 90–215?days) from the initiation of paclitaxel treatment. In the non-docetaxel group, the RR was 11.5% (3/26) among patients with measurable lesions, PFS was 82?days (95% CI, 52–106?days), and OS was 143?days (95% CI, 121–178?days). The efficacy of weekly paclitaxel thus appeared to be similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

Weekly paclitaxel was modestly active in patients with gastric cancer refractory to docetaxel-based chemotherapy.     

A multicenter analysis of GTX chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Purpose

Studies treating adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with gemcitabine alone or in combination with a doublet have demonstrated modest improvements in survival. Recent reports have suggested that using the triple-drug regimen FOLFIRINOX can substantially extend survival in patients with metastatic disease. We were interested in determining the clinical benefit of another three-drug regimen of gemcitabine, docetaxel and capecitabine (GTX) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Patients and methods

The cases of 154 patients, who received treatment with GTX chemotherapy with histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, were retrospectively reviewed. All demographic and clinical data were captured including prior therapy, adverse events, treatment response and survival.

Results

One hundred and seventeen metastatic and 37 locally advanced cases of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were reviewed. Partial responses were noted in 11% of cases, and stable disease was observed in 62% of patients. Responses significantly correlated with toxicity (neutropenia, ALT elevation and hospitalizations). Grade 3 or greater hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were noted in 41% and 9% of cases, respectively. Overall median survival was 11.6?months. Chemotherapy na?ve patients with metastatic and locally advanced disease achieved a median survival of 11.3 and 25.0?months, respectively.

Conclusions

We observe a substantial survival benefit with GTX chemotherapy in our cohort of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. These findings warrant further investigation of this combination in this patient population.     

Repeated Radionuclide therapy in metastatic paraganglioma leading to the highest reported cumulative activity of 131I-MIBG

Objective

To examine the efficacy of different radiation doses after achievement of a complete response to chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Methods

Patients with stage I-IV DLBCL treated from 1995?C2009 at Duke Cancer Institute who achieved a complete response to chemotherapy were reviewed. In-field control, event-free survival, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Dose response was evaluated by grouping treated sites by delivered radiation dose.

Results

105 patients were treated with RT to 214 disease sites. Chemotherapy (median 6 cycles) was R-CHOP (65%), CHOP (26%), R-CNOP (2%), or other (7%). Post-chemotherapy imaging was PET/CT (88%), gallium with CT (1%), or CT only (11%). The median RT dose was 30?Gy (range, 12?C40?Gy). The median radiation dose was higher for patients with stage I-II disease compared with patients with stage III-IV disease (30 versus 24.5?Gy, p?<?0.001). Five-year in-field control, event-free survival, and overall survival for all patients was 94% (95% CI: 89-99%), 84% (95% CI: 77-92%), and 91% (95% CI: 85-97%), respectively. Six patients developed an in-field recurrence at 10 sites, without a clear dose response. In-field failure was higher at sites????10?cm (14% versus 4%, p?=?0.06).

Conclusion

In-field control was excellent with a combined modality approach when a complete response was achieved after chemotherapy without a clear radiation dose response.     

Survival prolongation after treatment failure of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: combined analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Trials JCOG9205 and JCOG9912

Background

Two randomized phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (JCOG9205 and JCOG9912) conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group used 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion (5-FUci) as the control arm. New active agents (e.g., S-1, irinotecan, and taxanes) were introduced as second-line chemotherapy in the late 1990s after JCOG9205. This combined analysis evaluated whether patients in the 5-FUci arm of JCOG9912 exhibited better survival after adjusting for baseline factors and also investigated the cause of survival prolongation.

Patients and methods

The subjects were patients assigned to the 5-FUci arms who met the eligibility criteria of both JCOG9205 and JCOG9912. Overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival after treatment failure in the first-line chemotherapy (OS-TTF) were compared after adjusting baseline characteristics using the Cox proportional hazard model. Second-line chemotherapy details were also reviewed.

Results

The combined analysis included 89 and 230 patients in JCOG9205 and JCOG9912, respectively. After adjusting baseline characteristics, TTF was similar between groups (HR 0.95; 95 % CI, 0.73–1.26). However, both OS (HR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.56–0.99) and OS-TTF (HR, 0.76; 95 % CI, 0.57–1.01) were longer in JCOG9912. More patients in JCOG9912 received second-line chemotherapy (83 vs. 52 %) with new drugs (77 vs. 10 %) than in JCOG9205. OS-TTF was substantially prolonged in patients who received second-line chemotherapy (HR, 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.46–0.95).

Conclusion

OS and OS-TTF were longer in JCOG9912 than JCOG9205. Second-line chemotherapy with new drugs is a potential reason for the observed prolongation of survival.