Long-term follow-up of allogeneic HSCT for CML reveals significant improvement in the outcome over the last decade

Allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is still the only curative therapeutic option for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). To examine the development of allogeneic HSCT at our center over the past two decades (decade 1: 1984–1994; decade 2: 1995–2005), all CML patients transplanted in first chronic phase (n = 234) were analyzed with respect to patient characteristics, overall survival, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and relapse incidence. The median follow up time was 54 months (range 1–218). The incidence of acute graft vs host disease (GvHD) °II–IV and extensive chronic GvHD were not different between the two decades (p = 0.894 and p = 0.422, respectively). There was also no difference in the relapse incidence (23 vs 26%, p = 0.869). One-year TRM and overall survival were improved in the later decade (33 vs 18%, p = 0.011 and 62 vs 73% at 5 years, p = 0.063, respectively). The major reason for improved outcome in decade 2 was the improved management of acute GvHD and infections in the early phase after transplantation (p = 0.026). In conclusion, the past decade has seen significant improvement in the performance of allogeneic HSCT for CML.     

Growth factor-associated graft-versus-host disease and mortality 10 years after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

This study analysed the effects of growth factor on outcome after haematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation (HSCT) with >9 years follow‐up. Of 1887 adult patients with acute leukaemia who received bone marrow from human leucocyte antigen (HLA)‐identical siblings and were treated with myeloablative conditioning, 459 (24%) were treated with growth factor. Growth factor hastened engraftment of neutrophils (P < 0·0001), but reduced platelet counts (P = 0·0002). Graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD)‐free survival (no acute GVHD grade II–IV or chronic GVHD) at 10 years was 12 ± 2% (±SE) in the growth factor group, as opposed to 17 ± 2% in the controls [hazard ratio (HR) 0·81, P = 0·001]. Similar differences in GVHD‐free survival were seen in patients with or without conditioning with total body irradiation (TBI). Non‐relapse mortality (NRM) was higher in the growth factor group irrespective of whether or not TBI conditioning was included [HR = 1·48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·15–1·9; P = 0·002; HR = 1·59; 95% CI: 1·07–2·37; P = 0·02, respectively]. Both groups had similar probabilities of leukaemic relapse (HR = 0·96; 95% CI: 0·78–1·18; P = 0·71). Leukaemia‐free survival (LFS) at 10 years was 35 ± 2% in those receiving growth factor prophylaxis, as opposed to 44 ± 1% in the controls (HR = 0·70; 95% CI: 0·60–0·82; P = 0·00001). Prophylaxis with growth factor increases the risk of GVHD, does not affect relapse, increases NRM and reduces LFS > 10 years after HSCT, regardless of conditioning with TBI.     

Sequential chemotherapy followed by reduced‐intensity conditioning and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with relapse or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a survey from the Acute Leukaemia Working Party of EBMT

This study analysed the outcome of 267 patients with relapse/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML ) who received sequential chemotherapy including fludarabine, cytarabine and amsacrine followed by reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC ) and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT ). The transplants in 77 patients were from matched sibling donors (MSD s) and those in 190 patients were from matched unrelated donors. Most patients (94·3%) were given anti‐T‐cell antibodies. The incidence of acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD ) of grades II ‒IV was 32·1% and that of chronic GVHD was 30·2%. The 3‐year probability of non‐relapse mortality (NRM ) was 25·9%, that of relapse was 48·5%, that of GVHD ‐free and relapse‐free survival (GRFS ) was 17·8% and that of leukaemia‐free survival (LFS ) was 25·6%. In multivariate analysis, unrelated donor recipients more frequently had acute GVHD of grades II ‒IV [hazard ratio (HR ) = 1·98, P  = 0·017] and suffered less relapses (HR  = 0·62, P  = 0·01) than MSD recipients. Treatment with anti‐T‐cell antibodies reduced NRM (HR  = 0·35, P  = 0·01) and improved survival (HR  = 0·49, P  = 0·01), GRFS (HR  = 0·37, P  = 0·0004) and LFS (HR  = 0·46, P  = 0·005). Thus, sequential chemotherapy followed by RIC HSCT and use of anti‐T‐cell antibodies seems promising in patients with refractory AML .     

Persistent MRD before and after allogeneic BMT predicts relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) during early chemotherapy is a powerful predictor of relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and is used in children to determine eligibility for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first (CR1) or later complete remission (CR2/CR3). Variables affecting HSCT outcome were analysed in 81 children from the ANZCHOG ALL8 trial. The major cause of treatment failure was relapse, with a cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years (CIR) of 32% and treatment‐related mortality of 8%. Leukaemia‐free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar for HSCT in CR1 (LFS 62%, OS 83%, n = 41) or CR2/CR3 (LFS 60%, OS 72%, n = 40). Patients achieving bone marrow MRD negativity pre‐HSCT had better outcomes (LFS 83%, OS 92%) than those with persistent MRD pre‐HSCT (LFS 41%, OS 64%, P < 0·0001) or post‐HSCT (LFS 35%, OS 55%, P < 0·0001). Patients with B‐other ALL had more relapses (CIR 50%, LFS 41%) than T‐ALL and the main precursor‐B subtypes including BCR‐ABL1, KMT2A (MLL), ETV6‐RUNX1 (TEL‐AML1) and hyperdiploidy >50. A Cox multivariate regression model for LFS retained both B‐other ALL subtype (hazard ratio 4·1, P = 0·0062) and MRD persistence post‐HSCT (hazard ratio 3·9, P = 0·0070) as independent adverse prognostic variables. Persistent MRD could be used to direct post‐HSCT therapy.     

Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells compared with bone marrow from HLA-identical siblings for reduced-intensity conditioning transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission: a retrospective analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT

Reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC)‐alloSCT is increasingly used for acute myelogenous leukemia. Limited data are available for the comparison of peripheral blood stem cells with bone marrow for RIC‐alloSCT. We used the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) ALWP data to compare the outcome of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (n = 1430) vs. bone marrow (BM) (n = 107) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients with complete remission that underwent RIC‐alloSCT from compatible sibling donors. The leukemia features, the disease status, and the time from diagnosis were similar between the two groups. Engraftment was achieved in 99% and 93% in the PBSC and BM groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The day of engraftment was significantly earlier for the PBSC vs. the BM group, 15 (1–59) and 19 (5–69), respectively (P < 0.001). Acute GVHD, severe GVHD (grade III–IV) and chronic GVHD did not differ between the groups. leukemia‐free survival (LFS), relapse, and non‐relapsed mortality (NRM) were 51 ± 2%, 32 ± 1%, and 17 ± 1% vs. 50 ± 6%, 38 ± 6%, and 12 ± 3% for the PBSC and BM groups, respectively. Our results indicate faster engraftment, but no difference in GVHD, LFS, relapse, and NRM when comparing PBSC to BM grafts from sibling donors following RIC conditioning. This is the first study comparing PBSC to BM grafts in the RIC setting, analyzing a homogeneous population of patients with AML in remission. Whether PBSC should be preferred for advanced phases of the disease, where the outcome is dominated by relapse incidences, needs further investigation.     

Assessing the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (allo‐HSCT) by analyzing survival end points in defined groups of acute myeloid leukemia patients: A retrospective,multicenter Polish Adult Leukemia Group study

The importance of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) for survival outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) currently remains unclear. The study aimed to compare measures of clinical treatment for patients with AML in CR1 (the first complete remission) with or without being subjected to allo‐HSCT. These consisted of leukemia‐free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non‐relapse mortality disease (NRM). Subjects were 622 patients, median age of 44, forming part of the prospective, randomized, and multicenter clinical Polish Adult Leukemia Group trials during 1999–2008. The Mantel–Byar approach was used to assess allo‐HSCT on survival endpoints, accounting for a changing transplant status. Undergoing allo‐HSCT significantly improved the LFS and OS for the entire group of patients with AML in CR1, along with the DAC induction subgroup and for the group with unfavorable cytogenetics aged 41–60. The CIR demonstrated that allo‐HSCT reduced the risk of relapse for patients with AML in CR1 and those with an unfavorable cytogenetic risk. In addition, the NRM analysis showed that allo‐HSCT significantly reduced the risk of death unrelated to relapse for the entire group of AML patients in CR1 and aged 41–60. The allo‐HSCT treatment particularly benefitted survival for the AML in CR1 group having an unfavorable cytogenetic prognosis. Am. J. Hematol. 90:904–909, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared to peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: a meta-analysis based on time-to-event data from randomized controlled trials

Controversy remains regarding the transplant outcomes of human leukocyte antigen-identical related bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for the treatment of patients with hematological malignancies. To provide an estimate of the effect of BMT and PBSCT on clinical outcomes in patients with hematological malignancies, we conducted a meta-analysis based on time-to-event data from 17 randomized controlled trials. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), from 1972 through July 2010, and conference proceedings through July 2009 and reference lists, without any language restriction, of randomized trials that compared the transplant outcomes after BMT and PBSCT in patients with hematological malignancies were searched for details. Two independent reviewers extracted the data. The outcomes examined were engraftment, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, transplant-related mortality (TRM), leukemia-free-survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS). Compared to PBSCT, BMT had lower neutrophil (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.80 to 2.42; p < 0.00001) and platelet (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.78 to 4.30; p < 0.00001) engraftment. BMT was associated with a significant decrease in the development of grades II–IV (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.90; p = 0.002) and III–IV (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.84; p = 0.001) acute GVHD as well as overall (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.83; p < 0.0001) and extensive (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.91; p = 0.002) chronic GVHD. BMT was associated with a higher incidence of relapse (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.74; p = 0.0004). Comparable TRM (1.08; 95% CI, 0.56 to 2.10; p = 0.81), LFS (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.30; p = 0.73), and OS (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.39; p = 0.65) were demonstrated for both treatments. An inverse linear relationship was observed between the acute GVHD difference (PBSCT minus BMT) and the outcome of OS (p = 0.016). Our meta-analysis suggest that BMT leads to slower hematological recovery, increasing rates of relapse, and a lower risk of GVHD, but no significant difference in LFS and OS. A lower incidence of acute GVHD is associated with a superior OS.     

Allogeneic transplantation is not superior to chemotherapy in most patients over 40 years of age with Philadelphia‐negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission

Survival of patients ≥40 years of age with Philadelphia‐negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains poor with current therapeutic approaches. It is unknown whether allogeneic hematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission confers a survival benefit compared to a chemotherapy‐only approach. We retrospectively compared the outcome of patients >40 years treated with HSCT or chemotherapy alone in first remission (n = 40 in each cohort). Three‐year overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) were not significantly different between the chemotherapy‐only and HSCT groups (OS, 46% [31–68] vs. 40% [27–59], P = 0.35; DFS, 31% [18–52] vs. 40% [27–59], P = 0.98). The 3‐year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non‐relapse mortality (NRM) were 61% [41–76] and 9% [2–21] for the chemotherapy‐only group and 28% [15–43] and 32% [17–47] for the transplant group (CIR, P = 0.011; NRM, P = 0.014). Allogeneic transplantation for patients ≥40 years with Ph‐negative ALL in first remission is associated with a lower CIR, but this benefit is offset by considerable NRM as compared with chemotherapy‐only approach. HSCT may be beneficial in patients with high‐risk disease features. Am. J. Hematol. 91:793–799, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A comparison of busulphan versus total body irradiation combined with cyclophosphamide as conditioning for autograft or allograft bone marrow transplantation in patients with acute leukaemia

We retrospectively compared the outcome in patients in the EBMT database transplanted for acute leukaemia from January 1987 to January 1994 who received busulphan and cyclophosphamide (BU/CY) as a pretransplant regimen versus those who received cyclophosphamide and total-body irradiation (CY/TBI). The patients were matched for type of transplant (autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) versus allogeneic (BMT)), diagnosis (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)), status (early (first complete remission, CR-1) versus intermediate (second or later remission, first relapse)), age, FAB classification for AML, prevention of graft-versus-host disease and year of transplantation. In ABMT recipients (matched paired 530 × 2) with ALL CR-1, AML CR-1 and AML intermediate disease, transplant-related mortalities (TRM), relapse incidence (RI) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS) did not differ significantly in patients treated with BU/CY or CY/TBI. However, in ABMT recipients with ALL intermediate disease, the probability of relapse was 82 ± 5% (±95% confidence interval) in the BU/CY group compared to 62 ± 6% in the CY/TBI group (P = 0.002) and the 2-year leukaemia-free survival 14 ± 4% and 34 ± 6%, respectively (P = 0.002). In BMT recipients of bone marrow from HLA-identical siblings (matched paired 391 × 2), the TRM, RI and LFS did not differ significantly between the two treatments in all groups. In particular, the 2-year LFS in patients with AML CR-1 was 64 ± 3% in those treated with BU/CY (n = 237) compared to 66 ± 3% in those given CY/TBI (n = 237). In all groups the findings were confirmed in a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) of the liver (P < 0.05) and haemorrhagic cystitis (P < 0.001) was more common in the BU/CY group compared to the CY/TBI group for ABMT and BMT patients. In conclusion, BU/CY and CY/TBI as pretransplant regimens gave similar results in all situations, except ABMT for ALL intermediate stages with more than 2 years from diagnosis to transplantation, where a lower RI and a higher LFS were associated with CY/TBI.     

Comparison of umbilical cord blood allogeneic stem cell transplantation vs. auto‐SCT for adult acute myeloid leukemia patients in second complete remission at transplant: a retrospective study on behalf of the SFGM‐TC

This retrospective study considered the outcomes of 181 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transplanted in second complete remission (CR2) between January 2005 and April 2012 and who received either a myeloablative autologous stem cell transplant (Auto‐SCT; n = 82; median age: 48 years; median follow‐up: 45 months) or an umbilical cord blood (UCB) allogeneic SCT (n = 99, median age: 46 years; median follow‐up: 36 months; conditioning regimens: myeloablative n = 21, reduced n = 78; single unit n = 37, double units n = 62). Although the Auto group showed a significant better prognostic profile at transplant, with longer median interval between diagnosis and time of graft, higher incidence of good‐risk cytogenetics and lower number of previously transplanted patients, 3‐year OS and LFS were similar between both groups (Auto: 59 ± 6% vs. 50 ± 6%, P = 0.45; and 57 ± 6% vs. 46 ± 6%, P = 0.37). In multivariate analysis, UCB allo‐SCT was associated with lower relapse incidence (HR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.11–0.82, P = 0.02), but higher non‐relapse mortality (NRM) (HR: 4.16; 95% CI: 1.46–11.9, P = 0.008). Results from this large study suggest that UCB allo‐SCT provides better disease control than auto‐SCT, which is especially important in the setting of high‐risk disease. However, this disease control advantage is counterbalanced by higher toxicity, highlighting the need for novel approaches aiming to decrease NRM after UCB allo‐SCT.     

Clofarabine-containing conditioning regimen for allo-SCT in AML/ALL patients: a survey from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT

Clofarabine (CLO), a second‐generation purine analogue, has demonstrated an efficient anti‐leukemia activity while showing a favorable toxicity profile. This retrospective multicenter report assessed the outcome of 90 patients who received a CLO‐containing conditioning regimen before allo‐SCT for AML (n = 69) or ALL (n = 21). Median age was 42 yr at transplant. The majority of cases (n = 66) presented with an active disease at transplant while 38 patients had received previous transplantation(s). A total of 88 and two patients received a reduced‐intensity conditioning or a myeloablative regimen, respectively. Engraftment was achieved in 97% of evaluable patients. With a median follow‐up of 14 months (range, 1–45), the 2‐year OS, LFS, relapse, and NRM rates were 28 ± 5%, 23 ± 5%, 41 ± 6%, and 35 ± 5%, respectively. When comparing AML and ALL patients, OS and LFS were significantly higher for AML (OS, 35 ± 6% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001); LFS: 30 ± 6% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001). In a Cox multivariate analysis, an AML diagnosis was the only factor associated with a better LFS ( HR = 0.37; 95%CI, 0.21–0.66; P = 0.001). We conclude that a CLO‐containing conditioning regimen prior to allo‐SCT might be an effective treatment. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of CLO as part of conditioning regimens in acute leukemias.     

The superiority of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donor over chemotherapy for adult patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission

For adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from HLA-matched related donors (MSD) is recommended for standard and high-risk patients. The role of unrelated donor transplantation (URD) in first remission has not been fully determined. We sought to compare directly the outcome of URD allo-HSCT and chemotherapy in patients with high-risk ALL. In this single-center retrospective analysis, we included 74 consecutive adult patients with high-risk ALL in first complete remission (CR) and without a sibling donor, in which 32 patients received URD allo-HSCT in CR1 with busulfan-cyclophosphamide preparation regimen and in vivo T-cell depletion with anti-T-lymphoglobulin (ATG). The remaining 42 patients received chemotherapy consolidation and maintenance only in first remission. With median follow-up of 18 months, in the URD allo-HSCT group, the relapse rate (RR) was 30.6 ± 11.4 % which was significantly lower than that of the chemotherapy group (80.5 ± 10.1 %, p < 0.001), while non-relapse mortality (NRM) was higher (16.4 ± 6.7 % vs. 0, p = 0.028). Overall, 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was superior in the URD allo-HSCT group compared to chemotherapy group (57.8 ± 10.6 vs. 19.5 ± 10.5 %, p = 0.002), as was 3-year overall survival (OS, 63.5 ± 13.3 vs. 31.6 ± 10.6 %, p = 0.016). URD HSCT was the only factor associated with improved OS, LFS and reduced RR in multivariate analysis. Based on our data, URD allo-HSCT significantly reduced the relapse in high-risk ALL and the benefit translated into improvement in both LFS and OS. Prospective studies based on availability of HLA-matched URD are warranted to evaluate the precise role of URD transplantation in adult ALL.     

Peripheral blood late mixed chimerism in leucocyte subpopulations following allogeneic stem cell transplantation for childhood malignancies: does it matter?

The impact of persistent mixed chimerism (MC) after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains unclarified. We investigated the incidence of MC in peripheral blood beyond day +50 after HSCT and its impact on rejection, chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (c‐GvHD) and relapse in 161 children receiving allogeneic HSCT for haematological malignancies. The 1‐year incidence of late MC was 26%. Spontaneous conversion to complete donor chimerism (CC) occurred in 43% of patients as compared to 62% after donor lymphocyte infusions. No graft rejection occurred. The 1‐year incidence of c‐GvHD was 20 ± 7% for MC, and 18 ± 4% for CC patients (P = 0·734). The 3‐year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) according to chimerism status at days +50 and +100 was 22 ± 4% for CC patients vs. 22 ± 8% for MC patients (day +50; P = 0·935) and 21 ± 4% vs. 20 ± 7% (day +100; P = 0·907). Three‐year CIRs in patients with persistent MC and patients with CC/limited MC were comparable (8 ± 7% vs. 19 ± 4%; P = 0·960). HSCT for acute leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome as secondary malignancies (hazard ratio (HR) 4·7; P = 0·008), for AML (HR 3·0; P = 0·02) and from mismatched donors (HR 3·1; P = 0·03) were independent factors associated with relapse. Our data suggest that late MC neither protects from c‐GvHD nor does it reliably predict impending disease relapse.     

Monitoring MRD with flow cytometry: an effective method to predict relapse for ALL patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

This study evaluated the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by four-color flow cytometry (FCM) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). MRD was examined with four-color FCM at different time points in 139 patients (including pediatric and adult patients) with ALL after allo-HSCT. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) was applied to evaluate the MRD of Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (Ph+ ALL) patients. Patients who were FCM-positive (FCM+) after transplantation had a lower event-free survival (EFS) of 0.54 and a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of 0.54 compared to an EFS of 0.80 and a CIR of 0.08 in FCM-negative (FCM−) patients (EFS, p < 0.001; CIR, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in high-risk patients and Ph+ ALL patients. Moreover, a FCM+ status after the second month post-HSCT (defined as MRD positive) proved to be a predictor of leukemia relapse. Multivariate analysis for EFS, OS and CIR showed that MRD status after transplantation was an independent prognostic factor (p < 0.001, p = 0.013, and p < 0.001, respectively). A good correlation was found between the MRD results of FCM and RQ-PCR (n = 126 pairs, Spearman r = 0.8139, p < 0.001). MRD monitoring by four-color FCM post-transplantation is an important tool for relapse prediction in ALL patients. Prompt and appropriate pre-emptive anti-leukemia treatment could be considered based on the status of MRD after HSCT.     

Excellent disease eradication by myeloablative therapy and stem-cell transplantation in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

 Between February 1982 and 1999, 118 consecutive patients (65 male, 53 female) with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), with a median age of 35 years (range 17–56 years), received stem-cell grafts from a human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling (n=71), one-antigen-mismatched family member (n=2), matched unrelated donor (n=15), one-antigen-mismatched unrelated donor (n=4) or an autologous (n=26) graft. At the time of transplant, 56 patients were in the first complete remission (CR), 27 in the second CR, 6 in untreated relapse, 17 in primary refractory, and 12 in refractory relapse. The French-American-British classification (FAB) subtypes were as follows: M1 (n=25), M2 (n=28), M3 (n=11), M4 (n=32), M5 (n=16), M6 (n=6). For conditioning, most patients underwent total body irradiation-containing regimens. As of 28 February, 1999, probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) is 58% for patients after related and 45% after unrelated stem-cell transplantation (SCT). The probability of LFS is 70% for patients given allogeneic transplants in the first CR compared with 33% for those beyond the first CR at SCT. In autologous stem-cell graft recipients, the probability of LFS is 37%. Transplant-related mortality was 28% after related, 20% after unrelated, and 4% after autologous SCT. Probability of relapse for patients given related-donor stem-cell grafts in the first CR and beyond the first CR is 30% and 67%, 55% after unrelated and 63% after autologous stem-cell grafting. Thus, myeloablative therapy followed by allogeneic stem-cell infusion has a high curative potential for patients with AML in remission and offers substantial benefits to patients in advanced disease. Received: 26 May 1999 / Accepted: 20 August 1999     

Impact of measurable residual disease on outcomes of unrelated donor haematopoietic cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in AML in first complete remission

Pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) predicts relapse and outcome of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The impact of MRD on the outcomes of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based allo-HCT from a matched unrelated donor (UD) is unknown. This study assessed the impact of MRD in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in the first complete remission (CR1). A total of 272 patients (MRD negative [MRD−], n = 165; MRD positive [MRD+], n = 107) with a median follow-up of 19 (range: 16–24) months were studied. The incidence of grades II–IV and grades III–IV acute GVHD at day 180 was 25.2% and 25% (p = 0.99), and 10.6% and 6.8% (p = 0.29), respectively, and 2-year chronic GVHD was 35% and 30.4% (p = 0.96) in MRD+ and MRD− cohorts, respectively. In multivariate analysis, MRD+ status was associated with a higher incidence of relapse (RI) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.39–4.72), lower leukaemia-free survival (LFS) (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.23–3.39), overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.04–3.25) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.10–2.58). MRD status did not have a significant impact on non-relapse mortality (NRM), or acute or chronic GVHD risk. Among patients with AML undergoing UD allo-HCT with PTCy, pre-transplant MRD+ status predicted a higher relapse rate, lower LFS, OS and GRFS.     

Comparative outcomes of myeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with prior solid tumor: A report from the acute leukemia working party of the European society for blood and bone marrow transplantation

Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) arises as a late complication following antecedent solid tumors or hematologic diseases and their associated treatments. There are limited data regarding risk factors and outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for t-AML following a prior solid tumor, and furthermore, the impact of myeloablative (MAC) vs reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) on survival is unknown. The acute leukemia working party (ALWP) of the European society for blood and bone marrow transplantation (EBMT) performed a large registry study that included 535 patients with t-AML and prior solid tumor who underwent first MAC or RIC allogeneic HCT from 2000-2016. The primary endpoints of the study were OS and LFS. Patients receiving RIC regimens had an increase in relapse incidence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.26; P = 0.04), lower LFS (HR, 1.52; 95% CI 1.12-2.05, P = 0.007), and OS (HR, 1.51; CI 1.09-2.09; P = 0.012 ) . There were no differences in NRM and GRFS. Importantly, LFS and OS were superior in patients receiving ablative regimens due to a decrease in relapse. As NRM continues to decline in the current era, it is conceivable that outcomes of HCT for t-AML with prior solid tumor may be improved by careful patient selection for myeloablative regimens.     

Improved outcome with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a poor prognostic subgroup of patients with mixed‐lineage‐leukemia‐rearranged acute leukemia: Results from a prospective,multi‐center study

The purpose of this study is to define the role for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) in mixed‐lineage‐leukemia (MLL)‐rearranged acute leukemia, which is now poorly understood. A prospective, multi‐center cohort study to determine whether allo‐HSCT could decrease relapse rates and improve long‐term survival of MLL+ leukemia patients was performed. Fifty‐six consecutive patients diagnosed with MLL–rearranged acute leukemia undergoing allo‐HSCT from two transplant centers in China were enrolled between October 2007 and October 2012. The trial was registered at www.chictr.org as # ChiCTR‐ONC‐12002739. The incidences of grades II to IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) and of grades III and IV aGVHD were 28.8% (CI, 16.87–40.8%), and 14.2% (CI, 5.4–23.0%), respectively. The cumulative incidences for chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 2 years after HSCT were 35.2% (CI, 21.2–49.2%). Up to April 30, 2013, 12 patients had relapsed and 11 died from relapse, and 37 patients were still alive without disease recurrence. The relapse and NRM rates at 3 years were 25.3% (CI, 12.7–37.9%) and 18.0% (CI, 2.6–33.4%), respectively. The probalities of overall survival and leukemia free survival were 61.8% (CI, 46.0–77.6%) and 56.3% (CI, 38.1–74.5%) at 3 years, respectively. Patients transplanted during their hematological first complete remission (CR1) had a lower relapse rate (17.9% vs. 48.1%, P = 0.03) compared with patients transplanted beyond CR1. The median overall survival for the 29 patients not receiving allo‐HSCT during the study period was 145 days from diagnosis. This study showed that allo‐HSCT could be a valuable treatment choice for MLL+ acute leukemia. Am. J. Hematol. 89:130–136, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Thiotepa‐based conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia—A survey from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

In this study, we analyzed a thiotepa‐based conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, using the EBMT database. A total of 323 patients were identified. The median age was 43 years. Disease status at transplant was first complete remission (CR1) in 48.9%, CR2 in 21.7%, CR3 in 6.2%, while 23.2% of the patients had an active disease at the time of transplant. This was performed from a HLA‐matched sibling (49.8%) or a matched‐unrelated donor (51.2%). The incidence of acute graft‐vs.‐host disease (GvHD) (grade > II) was 26.6%, while chronic GvHD occurred in 35.9% of the patients at 1 year (24.6% with extensive disease). With a median follow‐up of 16.8 months, the nonrelapse mortality was 12.4 and 25.3% at 100 days and 1 year, respectively. The relapse incidence at 1 year was 33.3% with no difference for patients in CR1 (27%). The one‐year leukemia‐free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were 57 and 66%, respectively for the entire cohort and 50 and 66%, respectively in patients in CR1. Thiotepa/busulfan ± melphalan (n = 213) in comparison to thiotepa/other (n = 110) conditioning regimen resulted in higher relapse incidence at 1 year (34.9 vs. 30.3%, P = 0.016) and lower LFS (38.8 vs. 45.9%, P = 0.0203), while nonrelapse mortality (23.8 vs. 26.3%, n.s.) and OS (59.6 vs. 51.1%, P = 0.109) did not differ. This large study suggests that a thiotepa‐based conditioning for allogeneic transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia is feasible and effective, with the main outcomes being comparable to those achieved with other regimens. Am. J. Hematol. 92:18–22, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus—single center experience

Background and objective Little is known about the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). We investigated the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with DM. Materials and methods Thirty one patients with DM from a group of 263 consecutive patients undergoing a first-time catheter ablation of AF procedure were enrolled in a prospective study. The ablation protocol (guided by CARTO system) consisted in two continuous circular lesions around ipsilateral pulmonary veins. Results The following clinical characteristics differed between DM and no-DM patients: age (62.0 ± 10.8 vs. 56.1 ± 10.6 years, P = 0.004), longer AF history (9.6 ± 9.3 vs. 6.7 ± 6.3 years, P = 0.024), significantly larger left atrium size (41.1 ± 7.8 vs. 38.3 ± 5.8 mm, P = 0.021), hypertension (58.1 vs. 35.8%, P = 0.018) and structural heart disease (67.7 vs. 43.5%, P = 0.011). Despite a similar AF recurrence rate in DM and no-DM patients (32.3 vs. 22.4%, P = 0.240), the ablation procedure was complicated in 28 patients (11 hematomas, three cardiac tamponades and three strokes) and the incidence of complications was significantly higher in DM than in no-DM patients (29.0 vs. 8.2%, respectively, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that DM was an independent risk factor for complications occurrence (odd ratio 5.936, 95% confidence interval 2.059 to 17.112, P = 0.001). Conclusions First catheter ablation of AF procedure in DM patients was equally efficacious than in no-DM patients. However, DM patients had a higher incidence of complications, mostly thrombotic or hemorrhagic.