Helical CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis

Purpose: To determine the utility and accuracy of helical CT angiography (CTA) in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Methods: A comparison of CTA and conventional arteriogram was performed in 53 patients undergoing evaluation for carotid artery stenosis. Ninety-six carotid systems were evaluable. CTA stenosis was determined by the percent of area reduction seen on axial images through the level of greatest narrowing. MIP images were used to identify the point of maximal stenosis and to visualize overall vascular anatomy. The percent diameter stenosis was measured on conventional arteriograms using strict North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria. Results: Significant correlation was found between CTA and arteriography (NASCET method R = 0.87, ECST method R = 0.87, p < 0.001). Using NASCET >60% as an indicator for disease, CTA had a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 90%, accuracy of 89%, negative predictive value of 88%, and positive predictive value of 89%. CTA identified plaque characteristics such as ulcerations (8), occlusion (10), fatty plaques (22), calcifications (48), and fibrosis (2). CTA underestimated 2 cases of short segment stenoses because of volume averaging, but this discrepancy was detected by duplex scan. No complications or renal dysfunction occurred with CTA; 1 patient became symptomatic during arteriography, necessitating termination of the procedure. Conclusion: CTA is a safe, non-invasive technique that precisely measures carotid artery area reduction and highly correlates to conventional arteriography. With this new technology, the current standards for carotid artery imaging may need to be reevaluated, and the precise role for helical CTA more clearly defined. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:290-300.)     

Accuracy of angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the detection of carotid stenosis: a histopathological study of 123 cases

Summary Background. A prospective study was performed comparing the accuracy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) stenosis findings with measurements on histological specimens. Method. DSA and DUS were used to evaluate carotid stenosis and were compared with measurements on histological specimens. Intact carotid plaques from 123 cases were removed in one piece during surgery. The specimens were histologically processed and examined in transverse sections. The smallest inner and correlating outer diameters were measured and the extent of stenosis was calculated. Carotid artery stenoses were compared and statistics done. Specimens in symptomatic cases were divided into 3 groups: stenosis 30–49% (Group 1), stenosis 50–69% (Group 2) and stenosis 70–99% (Group 3). Specimens in asymptomatic cases were divided into two groups: stenosis ≤59% (Group A) and stenosis ≥60% (Group B). Findings. Wilcoxon paired tests revealed significant differences between DSA, DUS and measurements on histological specimens. In severe stenoses only, no significant difference was observed between stenosis measurement according to the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) angiography methodology and measurements on histological specimens. The most pronounced differences were found between angiography methodology of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and measurements on histological specimens. When investigating how often preoperative measurement classified stenosis into the same Group of stenoses as postoperative measurement, DUS was the most accurate diagnostic tool. Conclusions. This study confirmed our previous results, i.e., angiography underestimates the degree of carotid artery stenosis. DUS seems to be more accurate in classifying stenoses into different groups to the extent of narrowing of the carotid arteries. These results make the position of angiography in diagnostic algorithm of carotid stenoses investigations even more questionable.     

Variability in measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis by arch angiography and duplex ultrasonography--time for a reappraisal?

OBJECTIVES: to determine the inter- and intra-observer variability of ICA stenosis measurement using duplex, ECST and NASCET methods. DESIGN: a retrospective review of arch angiograms and carotid duplex scans in 50 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: carotid stenoses were calculated by three independent observers according to NASCET and ECST methods. Variation between observers for NASCET and ECST was determined. For each observer, the variation between NASCET and ECST was determined. The variation between duplex and both NASCET and ECST was determined. RESULTS: inter-observer agreement on the degree of ICA stenosis was clinically and statistically good for NASCET but was poorer for ECST. For each observer, comparison between NASCET and ECST showed 95% limits of agreement of around 50 percentage points. Comparison of duplex with NASCET and ECST showed similar 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: arch angiography allows reproducible measurement of carotid stenosis by the NASCET method between different observers. For the ECST method, reproducibility is not so good. Variations in results between NASCET and ECST and between angiography and duplex are significant. In view of the similar results of the NASCET and ECST trials, this suggests that degree of stenosis may only be a surrogate marker for outcome following carotid endarterectomy.     

Carotid artery stenting: to be or not to be?

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been the standard of care for suitable patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic high grade carotid stenosis since the landmark NASCET (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial), ECST (European Carotid Surgery Trial) and ACAS (Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Surgery) studies performed in the 1990s and more recently the ACST (Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial). Carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the treatment of both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis has recently been investigated as an alternative to CEA. We present a review of the most recent CAS trials and examine some of the controversies that surround them.     

Carotid endarterectomy before and after publication of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: In 1991, the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) demonstrated that carotid endarterectomy (CEA), in addition to best medical therapy, significantly reduces ipsilateral stroke in patients with high-grade (70 per cent or more) carotid artery stenosis compared with best medical therapy alone. In 1995, the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study demonstrated that CEA was of benefit in asymptomatic patients with stenosis greater than 60 per cent. The aim of this paper was to examine how the practice and outcome of CEA have changed since publication of these data. METHODS: A prospectively gathered computerized database comprising 634 consecutive CEAs was studied. Two time intervals were analysed: 1975-1991 inclusive (17 years) and 1 January 1992 to 1 May 1998 (6 years 4 months). RESULTS: Since 1991, there has been a fourfold increase in the number of CEAs performed annually for symptomatic disease. CEA is now performed almost exclusively for high-grade (more than 70 per cent) stenosis. There has been a significant reduction in the total peri-operative neurological event rate (12.5 versus 5.9 per cent, P < 0.05), and the 30-day combined major stroke (Rankin grade 3-5) and mortality rate has fallen to 2.0 per cent. The number of patients who have CEA for asymptomatic disease remains small with 16 of 30 being randomized within the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial. CONCLUSION: Publication of ECST and NASCET data has been associated with a major increase in the number of CEAs performed for symptomatic disease in this unit. Despite a greater proportion of high-risk patients, the results have improved progressively.     

Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: validation of Doppler/duplex ultrasound criteria and angiography against endarterectomy specimen.

OBJECTIVES: duplex ultrasound has replaced angiography prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in many institutions. However, the indications for CEA are based on angiographically controlled studies and widely accepted ultrasound criteria do not exist. Consequently, the reliability of Doppler and/or duplex ultrasound to predict a high-grade ICA stenosis has to be proven. DESIGN: prospective validation study. MATERIALS: one hundred and fifty carotid bifurcations assessed by ultrasound and selective angiography and 68 acrylat outcasts of carotid specimen after eversion CEA. METHODS: ICA stenosis was measured angiographically according to the ECST criteria. Combined Doppler acoustic standard criteria (CDASC), peak systolic frequency (PSF), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) served as criteria for the ultrasound assessment. These criteria and the results of angiography were compared to the degree of ICA stenosis determined by specimen measurements. RESULTS: the median degree of ICA stenosis as assessed by angiography (82%, range 56-97%) and CDASC (83%, range 50-99%) corresponded well to the specimen measurements (80%, range 50-95%). The sensitivity of angiography and CDASC to predict a 70-90% ICA stenosis (ECST criteria) compared to the specimen measurements was 88% and 95%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) reached 92% and 96%, respectively. CDASC were equivalent to angiography and were superior to the best single frequency or velocity parameters. If CDASC do not indicate a >/=70% ICA stenosis in spite of a PSV >/=180 cm/s and/or an EDV >/=50 cm/s, angiography may detect patients with a >70% ICA stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: CDASC are valid in the quantification of high-grade ICA stenosis. They are more reliable than single velocity and/or frequency measurements. However, if velocity criteria and CDASC do not agree, angiography should be performed.     

Audit of 149 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed by a single surgeon in a district general hospital over a 12-year period.

Carotid endarterectomy has been established by two large randomised controlled trials (European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET)) as an important surgical procedure for the prevention of ischaemic strokes in patients presenting with transient cerebral ischaemia or non-disabling strokes attributable to severe ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis. The operation carries significant risk of death and stroke and it has been advocated by some that carotid endarterectomy should only be performed in a small number of designated regional centres in order to achieve good surgical results. It is doubtful that the regional centres alone can cope with the increasing numbers of patients requiring carotid endarterectomy and there is therefore a requirement for the procedure to be carried out by vascular surgeons in district general hospitals. It is important that surgical results are audited to ensure that comparable outcomes are achieved. We present an audit of our experience of carotid endarterectomy since 1981. A total of 149 consecutive carotid endarterectomies were performed by a single surgeon with a special interest in carotid surgery. The results are comparable to ECST with a 30-day mortality of 0% and an overall 30-day stroke rate of 5.7% (major strokes) for patients with severe, ie 70-99%, ipsilateral carotid artery stenoses. We have shown that carotid endarterectomy is an operation that can be performed safely and with good results by suitably trained surgeons in district general hospitals.     

Overview of the principal results and secondary analyses from the European and North American randomised trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: Review of the primary results and secondary analyses from the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). DESIGN: Review of 48 ECST and NASCET papers. RESULTS: The simple assumption that all patients with a symptomatic stenosis >70% benefit from CEA is untenable. Approximately 70-75% will not have a stroke if treated medically. The ECST and NASCET have identified subgroups that should have expedited investigation and surgery (male sex, age >75 years, 90-99% stenosis, irregular plaque, hemispheric symptoms, recurrent events for >6 months, contralateral occlusion, multiple co-morbidity). Accordingly development of local protocols for patient selection/exclusion should involve surgeons and physicians and take account of the local operative risk. The ECST and NASCET have also shown that the ubiquitous "string sign" is not associated with a high risk of stroke, and emergency CEA is unnecessary. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons must quote their own results and be aware that a high operative risk reduces long-term benefit. Accordingly, in those centres with a higher operative death/stroke rate, some "lower risk" patients should probably be considered for best medical therapy alone. It is hoped that pooling of the ECST and NASCET databases will enable more definitive guidelines to be developed regarding who benefits most from CEA.     

Carotid arteriography impacts carotid stenosis management

Recent literature advocates carotid endarterectomy on duplex alone. The authors hypothesized that carotid angiography adds information that alters clinical management in a substantial number of patients compared to the use of carotid duplex examination alone. The records of 182 consecutive patients who underwent carotid artery duplex and subsequent carotid/cerebral angiography for suspected carotid artery stenosis between January 1998 and April 1999 were reviewed retrospectively. Carotid artery duplex examinations were stratified based on stenosis: < or =39%, 40% to 59%, 60% to 79% (moderate), 80% to 99% (severe), 100%. Carotid stenosis on angiograms was determined by NASCET criteria. New information found at angiography included vertebral, subclavian, or arch atherosclerosis, intracranial pathosis, or a change in duplex stenosis category to a degree of stenosis not requiring surgery. Clinical importance was attributed to angiograms that altered the patients' management plan. Angiography provided additional information in 53% (97/182) of patients. Vertebral disease was found in 25.1%, subclavian disease in 16.4%, intracranial disease in 15.3%, aortic arch disease in 3.3%. Patient treatment was altered in 30% (55/182). Angiographic findings downgraded the stenosis to medical therapy in 20.9% (38/182). The surgical plan was influenced in 5.5% (10/182). Nine intracranial aneurysms were discovered. Carotid angiography was essential for vascular bypass surgery planning in 3.3% (6/182). Angioplasty was performed in 2.2% (4/182). The accurate determination of stenosis is critical in determining optimal treatment of patients with carotid artery stenosis. Routine carotid angiography remains valuable in the clinical treatment of these patients.     

The limitations of diagnosis of carotid occlusion by Doppler ultrasound.

Duplex scanning has been advocated as an acceptable alternative to angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. To evaluate the accuracy of carotid Doppler in differentiating severe carotid stenosis from occlusion, we compared the results of angiography with duplex scanning in 124 carotid arteries (62 patients) and with continuous-wave Doppler in 662 carotid arteries (331 patients). The specificity was 95-99%, sensitivity was 86-96%, and accuracy was 95-98%. Duplex scanning wrongly identified occlusion in four arteries and failed to detect occlusion in one artery. In making decisions prior to carotid endarterectomy, even infrequent errors are unacceptable. We recommend angiography of all surgical candidates with apparent severe stenosis when the internal carotid artery cannot be clearly identified on duplex, or to distinguish apparent occlusion from undetectably low blood flow.     

Reappraisal of velocity criteria for carotid bulb/internal carotid artery stenosis utilizing high-resolution B-mode ultrasound validated with computed tomography angiography

OBJECTIVE: Reliability of the most commonly used duplex ultrasound (DUS) velocity thresholds for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis has been questioned since these thresholds were developed using less precise methods to grade stenosis severity based on angiography. In this study, maximum percent diameter carotid bulb ICA stenosis (European Carotid Surgery Trial [ECST] method) was objectively measured using high resolution B-mode DUS validated with computed tomography angiography (CTA) and used to determine optimum velocity thresholds for > or =50% and > or =80% bulb internal carotid artery stenosis (ICA). METHODS: B-mode DUS and CTA images of 74 bulb ICA stenoses were compared to validate accuracy of the DUS measurements. In 337 mild, moderate, and severe bulb ICA stenoses (n = 232 patients), the minimal residual lumen and the maximum outer bulb/proximal ICA diameter were determined on longitudinal and transverse images. This in contrast to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method using normal distal ICA lumen diameter as the denominator. Severe calcified carotid segments and patients with contralateral occlusion were excluded. In each study, the highest peak systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic (EDV) velocities as well as ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) ratio were recorded. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimum threshold for each hemodynamic parameter was determined to predict > or =50% (n = 281) and > or =80% (n = 62) bulb ICA stenosis. RESULTS: Patients mean age was 74 +/- 8 years; 49% females. Clinical risk factors for atherosclerosis included coronary artery disease (40%), diabetes mellitus (32%), hypertension (70%), smoking (34%), and hypercholesterolemia (49%). Thirty-three percent of carotid lesions (n = 110) presented with ischemic cerebrovascular symptoms and 67% (n = 227) were asymptomatic. There was an excellent agreement between B-mode DUS and CTA (r = 0.9, P = .002). The inter/intraobserver agreement (kappa) for B-mode imaging measurements were 0.8 and 0.9, respectively, and for CTA measurements 0.8 and 0.9, respectively. When both PSV of > or =155 cm/s and ICA/CCA ratio of > or =2 were combined for the detection of > or =50% bulb ICA stenosis, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 97% and an accuracy of 82% were obtained. For a > or =80% bulb ICA stenosis, an EDV of > or =140 cm/s, a PSV of > or =370 cm/s and an ICA/CCA ratio of > or =6 had acceptable probability values. CONCLUSION: Compared with established velocity thresholds commonly applied in practice, a substantially higher PSV (155 vs 125 cm/s) was more accurate for detecting > or =50% bulb/ICA stenosis. In combination, a PSV of > or =155 cm/s and an ICA/CCA ratio of > or =2 have excellent predictive value for this stenosis category. For > or =80% bulb ICA stenosis (NASCET 60% stenosis), an EDV of 140 cm/s, a PSV of > or =370 cm/s, and an ICA/CCA ratio of > or =6 are equally reliable and do not indicate any major change from the established criteria. Current DUS > or =50% bulb ICA stenosis criteria appear to overestimate carotid bifurcation disease and may predispose patients with asymptomatic carotid disease to untoward costly diagnostic imaging and intervention.     

Effect of image normalization on carotid plaque classification and the risk of ipsilateral hemispheric ischemic events: results from the asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of stroke study

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of image normalization on plaque classification and the risk of ipsilateral ischemic neurologic events in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The first 1,115 patients recruited to the Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Stroke (ACSRS) study with a follow-up of 6 to 84 months (mean 37.1 months) were included in this study. Duplex ultrasonography was used for grading the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis and for plaque characterization (types 1-5), which was performed before and after image normalization. One hundred sixteen ipsilateral ischemic hemispheric events occurred. Image normalization resulted in 60% of plaques being reclassified. Before image normalization, a high event rate was associated with all types of plaque. After image normalization, 109 (94%) of the events occurred in patients with plaque types 1 to 3. For patients with European Carotid Stenosis Trial (ECST) 70 to 99% diameter stenosis (equivalent to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial [NASCET] 50-99%) with plaque types 1 to 3, the cumulative stroke rate was 14% at 7 years (2% per year), and for patients with plaque types 4 and 5, the cumulative stroke rate was 0.9% at 7 years (0.14% per year). The results suggest that asymptomatic patients with plaque types 4 and 5 classified as such after image normalization are at low risk irrespective of the degree of stenosis.     

New duplex ultrasound scan criteria for managing symptomatic 50% or greater carotid stenosis

PURPOSE: The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) showed that selected patients benefited from surgery when their carotid artery was 50% or more stenosed. This study assessed the accuracy of color-flow duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) parameters to detect 50% or greater carotid artery stenosis and to determine the situations in which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) without angiography could be justified. METHODS: From March 1, 1995, to December 1, 1995, all patients considered for CEA were studied with DUS and carotid angiography. Results of the two tests were blindly compared. DUS measurements of internal carotid artery (ICA) peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity, and ratio of the ICA to common carotid artery PSV (ICA/CCA) were subjected to receiver operator characteristic curve analysis to determine the most accurate criterion predicting 50% or greater angiographic stenosis. The criterion for identifying patients for CEA without angiography was selected from criteria with a high positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 188 carotid bifurcations were available for comparison. A PSV (ICA/CCA) of 2 or higher was the most accurate criterion for detection of 50% or greater stenosis, with an accuracy rate of 93% (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 89%; PPV, 92%). A PSV (ICA/CCA) of 3.6 or higher was the best criterion for identifying candidates for CEA who had not undergone earlier angiography, with PPV, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of 98%, 77%, 98%, and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These redefined criteria detect the NASCET-defined threshold level of 50% or greater ICA stenosis, above which CEA results in stroke reduction. A management algorithm based on these criteria should help to minimize both angiography and unnecessary intervention.     

Diagnostic Performance of Duplex Ultrasonography in the Detection of High Grade Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

OBJECTIVES: to establish on a national basis whether the diagnostic accuracy of carotid duplex justifies carotid surgery without preoperative angiography. DESIGN: prospective national multicentre study with 10 participating university and county hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: one hundred and thirty-four patients, aged 69+/-9 years, were subjected to routine carotid duplex ultrasonography and angiography. The influence of relevant factors on the relation between ultrasonographic and angiographic variables was evaluated using multiple regression analysis. The capacity of carotid ultrasonography to detect internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis > or =80% was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: the correlation between peak systolic velocity in ICA (PSV(ICA)) and the angiographic degree of stenosis was strong and significantly influenced only by the applied Doppler angle. Accordingly, the optimal PSV(ICA) cutpoint values for the diagnosis of ICA stenosis > or =80% (ECST method) differed substantially (2.1 and 3.2 m/s) between the two considered angle ranges (0-49 degrees and 50-62 degrees ), the ability to identify high grade ICA stenosis being significantly better at small Doppler angles (0-49 degrees ). CONCLUSION: ultrasonographic duplex technique identifies high grade ICA stenosis with a high degree of accuracy, which can be further improved by the application of small Doppler angles and the use of angle range specific PSV(ICA) cut-off points.     

Accuracy of duplex scanning in the detection of stenosis after carotid endarterectomy

The results of duplex ultrasonography in grading stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (78 sites) were compared with those of contrast angiography in 71 patients studied for recurrent or contralateral occlusive disease of the carotid bifurcation. Duplex and angiographic studies were performed within one month of each other at a mean postoperative interval of 44 months (range 3 to 122 months). Stenosis of the common carotid (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) was classified into five disease categories (normal or less than 15% diameter reduction [DR], 16% to 49% DR, 50% to 75% DR, greater than 75% DR, and occlusion). The overall accuracy of duplex scanning compared with angiography in predicting recurrent carotid bifurcation disease was 83%, a level of agreement similar to classification of disease involving the nonoperated, contralateral bifurcation (overall accuracy 87%). Recurrent stenosis (greater than 50% DR) or occlusion of the CCA or ICA after endarterectomy was identified with an accuracy of 97%. Overestimation of severity of recurrent stenosis accounted for 11 of 13 duplex classification errors (85%). Presence of moderate (30% to 50% DR) recurrent stenosis of the CCA, tortuosity of the ICA, and severe contralateral carotid bifurcation disease were associated with velocity spectra that predicted a more severe recurrent stenosis at the endarterectomy site compared with angiographic grading. The level of agreement between duplex scanning and angiography was comparable to the interobserver variability in angiographic interpretation. The accuracy reported justifies the use of duplex scanning to grade the severity of carotid bifurcation recurrent stenosis and to follow these lesions for disease progression.     

The clinical utility of carotid duplex scanning

We retrospectively compared the results of duplex scanning (DS) with contrast angiography (CAN) in the evaluation of 119 patients whose 238 carotid arteries were evaluated by both methods within a four-week period. The results of all patients were then categorized by two different definitions of severity of stenosis. Category A classified 1-29% stenosis as mild, 30-69% stenosis as moderate, and 70-99% diameter reduction as severe stenosis. Category B defined mild stenosis as 1-19% lumen diameter reduction, moderate as 20-49% stenosis, and severe as 50-99% stenosis. The findings by each classification were compared in 60 patients with hemispheric symptoms and in 59 patients with nonspecific symptoms. CAN was our "gold standard", and exhibited greater sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and predictive values than DS. Carotid arteries with 70% stenosis were identified by DS with greater specificity, accuracy, and predictive values than were arteries with 50% stenoses. Only the sensitivity was comparable in categorizations A and B (80% and 83%). All parameters of measurement were superior in patients with hemispheric symptoms. DS alone cannot substitute for CAN in selecting patients for carotid endarterectomy because its error rate exceeded acceptable rates of complications for carotid artery surgery. The false positive rate of DS was 4%. DS failed to diagnose 7 of 19 carotid artery occlusions, 9 of 11 ulcerated plaques, 7 of 119 instances of aortic arch disease, and 13 cases of severe intracranial artery stenosis.     

Behandlung der Karotisstenose durch Stentimplantation

The incidence of arterioarterial stroke originating from the supra-aortic branches is 187/100,000/year.The 90-day prognosis shows a probability of 15% mortality and 19% severe disability. Based on the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), the indications for endarterectomy have a high level of evidence. Recommendations for carotid endarterectomy depending on the perioperative risk are defined in the American Heart Association (AHA) and European Stroke Initiative (EUSI) proposals. Several trials have shown that stent supported carotid angioplasty is now an almost equivalent alternative for short-term and intermediate-term follow-up, and an even safer alternative technique in surgically high risk patients. However, the following contraindications must be taken into consideration: thrombosis of the internal carotid artery, long stenoses, aneurysms of the aortic arch with involvement of the supra-aortic branches, carotid occlusion in cases of maintenance of the branchial artery coiling of the internal exit area, as well as severe contrast medium allergy. For the endovascular surgeon this implies the need to learn about and to be involved in using this challenging technique. This therapeutic option allows patient oriented therapy and may further reduce the overall complication rate of carotid stenosis therapy.     

Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery stenosis

Purpose: Large multicenter trials (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial, European Carotid Surgery Trial) have documented the benefits of carotid endarterectomy for treating symptomatic patients with ≥70% stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Although color-flow duplex scanning has become the preferred method for noninvasive assessment of internal carotid artery disease, no criteria have been generally accepted to identify this subset of patients. We previously reported a retrospective series to establish such criteria. This study details our results when these criteria were applied prospectively.Methods: Carotid color-flow duplex scans were compared with arteriograms in 457 patients who underwent both studies. Criteria for ≥70% internal carotid artery stenosis were peak systolic velocity >130 cm/sec and end-diastolic velocity >100 cm/sec. Internal carotid arteries with peak systolic velocity <40 cm/sec in which only a trickle of flow could be detected were classified as preocclusive lesions (95% to 99% stenosis). Arteriographic stenosis was determined by comparing the diameter of the internal carotid artery at the site of maximal stenosis to the diameter of the normal distal internal carotid artery.Results: Internal carotid artery stenosis of ≥70% was detected with a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 97%, positive predictive value of 89%, negative predictive value of 96%, and overall accuracy of 95%. Eighty-seven percent of 70% to 99% stenoses were correctly identified. False-positive errors (n = 10) were attributed to contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion or high-grade (>90%) stenosis (n = 5) and to interpreter error (n = 1); no explanation was apparent in the other four. Eleven of 12 false-negative examinations occurred in patients with 70% to 80% internal carotid artery stenosis.Conclusions: In our laboratories, prospective application of the above velocity criteria identified internal carotid artery stenosis of ≥70% with a reasonably high degree of accuracy. Errors occurred when stenoses were borderline and in patients with severe contralateral disease. With suitably modified velocity criteria, color-flow duplex scanning remains the most reliable noninvasive method for identifying symptomatic patients who are candidates for carotid endarterectomy. (J V ASC S URG 1996;23:254-62.)     

Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial?

Purpose: The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and the Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Study (ACAS) both confirmed the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke in patients who have significant carotid stenosis. A uniform technique for measuring carotid stenosis from an arteriogram (% stenosis = [1 - minimum residual lumen/normal distal cervical internal carotid artery diameter] × 100) was used in both trials, with reproducibility internally validated. The reliability of this measurement when used outside the trials for defining carotid stenosis has not been validated. Imprecise calculation of carotid stenosis can result in a 50% overestimation of significant carotid disease and potential overuse of carotid surgery. This is a prospective study of the reliability of carotid stenosis measurements performed by practicing physicians of different specialties and different levels of clinical experience.Methods: Two vascular surgeons and two interventional radiologists (one resident and one staff member per specialty), blinded to results, calculated the percent stenosis from 219 consecutive arteriograms performed to evaluate extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease; 72 random films were reread by each individual. The interpretations were grouped as <60% or ≥60% stenosis (ACAS) and as <30%, 30% to 69%, and ≥70% stenosis (NASCET). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement were analyzed with the kappa statistic and Pearson correlation coefficients.Results: Interobserver reliability in categorizing carotid stenosis revealed excellent agreement for both ACAS (κ = 0.825 to 0.903) and NASCET groups (κ = 0.729 to 0.793). Interobserver correlation coefficients ranged from 0.91 to 0.95. Intraobserver agreement was also highly reproducible for both the ACAS (κ = 0.732 to 0.970) and NASCET categories (κ = 0.634 to 0.805). Intraobserver correlation coefficients ranged from 0.89 to 0.95.Conclusion: The NASCET technique for quantification of carotid stenosis can be easily learned by physicians and reliably implemented for appropriate identification of candidates for carotid endarterectomy. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:449-56.)     

Follow-up of stented carotid arteries by Doppler ultrasound

OBJECTIVE: Blood flow velocity (BFV) in the carotid artery is altered by stent placement. The significance of these alterations is unknown. In our experience, both standard BFV criteria for stenosis and customized criteria recommended by other authors have led to high rates of false-positive studies. We reviewed our experience with Doppler ultrasonography immediately after extracranial carotid artery stent placement to define criteria for restenosis by BFV. METHODS: Complete carotid angiograms and BFV results were available for 114 patients treated between January 1998 and December 1999. Angiographic images obtained immediately after stent placement and at follow-up were measured for residual or recurrent stenosis by a blinded reviewer according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method. Results of BFV studies obtained within 1 week of stent placement were interpreted by using two standard criteria (A, peak in-stent systolic velocity greater than 125 cm/s; B, internal carotid artery-to-common carotid artery ratio greater than 3.0) and two customized criteria (C, peak in-stent velocity greater than 170 cm/s; D, internal carotid artery-to-common carotid artery ratio greater than 2.0). The results of follow-up angiography and the most recent Doppler study were compared for nine patients. RESULTS: On the basis of an examination of Doppler studies obtained immediately after stent placement, 36 patients met Criterion A for stenosis according to measured BFV (corresponding mean angiographic stenosis, 14.73 +/- 18.45%), 3 patients met Criterion B (mean stenosis, 1.67 +/- 2.89%), 8 patients met Criterion C (mean stenosis, 12.61 +/- 13.18%), and 14 met Criterion D (mean stenosis, 7.98 +/- 21.74%). No patient with Doppler criteria for significant stenosis had more than 50% residual stenosis. Three of nine patients who underwent follow-up angiography had stenosis of 50% or more; of these three patients, two underwent second angioplasty procedures. The peak in-stent systolic velocity or internal carotid artery-to-common carotid artery BFV ratio for each of the three patients with restenosis, but not for the six other patients, had increased by more than 80% since the immediate post-stenting Doppler study. CONCLUSION: Strict BFV criteria for restenosis after carotid artery stenting are less reliable than change in BFV over time. An immediate post-stenting Doppler study must be obtained to serve as a reference value for future follow-up evaluation.