Cluster headache pain vs. other vascular headache pain: differences revealed with two approaches to the McGill Pain Questionnaire

We compared cluster headache pain and other vascular (migraine and mixed) headache pain on pain intensity ratings and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Cluster headache sufferers reported not only more intense pain and more affective distress, but also different pain qualities than did migraine and mixed headache sufferers. The pain qualities that best distinguished cluster headaches from other vascular headaches were the presence of punctate pressure and thermal sensations and the absence of dull pain. Although cluster headache sufferers and other vascular headache sufferers endorsed different sensory pain qualities, MPQ subscales proved no better than pain intensity ratings at distinguishing these two groups. This finding may have occurred because MPQ subscale scores include an intensity component and do not provide information about specific pain qualities such as that provided by MPQ sensory items. These findings provide evidence that cluster headaches are characterized by distinct pain qualities and are not simply a more intense version of the same vascular headache pain experienced by migraine and mixed headache sufferers. They further suggest than when the MPQ is used to assess specific pain qualities, sensory items and not the sensory subscale are the preferred units for analysis.     

Acetazolamide Testing of Cerebral Vasodilator Capacity Provokes "Vascular" But Not Tension Headaches

Cerebrovascular capacitance was tested by measuring local cerebral blood flow (LCBF) by xenon-contrasted CT scanning before and after the oral administration of 14.3 mg/kg of acetazolamide among 45 subjects including 15 age-matched controls without history of headache, 20 migraineurs with and without aura, 3 patients with cluster headache, and 7 patients with tension-type headache. Percentage increases of LCBF were measured in 10 regions located throughout both hemispheres. Laterality indices for asymmetric LCBF increases were calculated. Local cerebral blood flow in cortical gray matter increased 5.9% in controls, 9.9% in patients with tension headaches, but 18.6% in both migraine and cluster headache patients; significantly greater LCBF increases than among controls or among patients with tension headaches (P<0.05). Increases in LCBF were significantly asymmetric among migraine and cluster patients and provoked typical unilateral vascular headaches which responded to sumatriptan. Maximal asymmetric LCBF increases also corresponded to the reported side of the induced headaches confirming their vascular pathogenesis. Patients with tension headaches and controls without history of headache did not develop head pain after acetazolamide.     

Effectiveness of nasal sumatriptan in 5- to 12-year-old children

OBJECTIVE: To assess the tolerability and effectiveness of nasal sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine in 5- to 12-year-old children. BACKGROUND: Although headaches are a common disorder and occur in up to 10.6% of children, many of the new migraine abortive agents have not been well evaluated in this population. It has recently been reported that nasal sumatriptan is effective in the treatment of migraine in adolescents. In younger children, it is yet to be characterized. In addition, many children have significant amounts of vomiting with their migraines, limiting their use of oral medications. DESIGN AND METHODS: Children with headache were evaluated by a child neurologist, child psychologist, and pediatric nurse practitioner. Clinical and International Headache Society diagnoses were established for each child. Patients with headaches that were either unresponsive to oral medications or had significant vomiting were treated with nasal sumatriptan. Initial administration and tolerability were performed in the Headache Center at Cincinnati's Children's Hospital Medical Center. Patients or their parents were contacted to assess the overall effectiveness of nasal sumatriptan after home administration. RESULTS: Ten patients aged between 5 and 12 years (mean, 9.9 years) received either a 5-mg (n = 2) or 20-mg (n = 8) dose of sumatriptan. All 10 patients had a clinical diagnosis of migraine; 7 met the International Headache Society criteria for migraine. The mean age of headache onset was 6.6 years. A total of 57 headaches were treated; 47 (82.5%) responded to sumatriptan. Of the patients who treated headaches, the mean number of headaches treated was 5.2, while the mean number of responsive headaches was 4.3. One patient had no response, 2 patients had a 50% response, and 6 patients had 100% response to the nasal sumatriptan. Three patients reported persistent "bad taste." CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates that nasal sumatriptan may be effective in aborting migraine in young children (aged 5 to 12 years). It also suggests that there may be subgroups for which it works well. This information suggests that double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are necessary to determine the overall effectiveness of nasal sumatriptan in this age group.     

Acupuncture for Cancer Pain and Related Symptoms

A headache is a common neurological disorder, and large numbers of patients suffer from intractable headaches including migraine, tension headache and cluster headache, etc., with no clear therapeutic options. Despite the advances made in the treatment of headaches over the last few decades, subsets of patients either do not achieve adequate pain relief or cannot tolerate the side effects of typical migraine medications. An electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerves via an implantable pulse generator appears to be good alternative option for patients with treatment-refractory headaches. A number of clinical trials show considerable evidence supporting the use of peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) for headaches not responding to conservative therapies. However, the mechanism by which PNS improves headaches or predicts who will benefit from PNS remains uncertain. The decision to use PNS should be individualized based on patient suffering and disability. Hence, further work is imperative. Here, we discuss the mechanism, indication, efficacy, implant technique, and complications of PNS.     

The Controlled Application of Cold and Heat by a New Device (Migra-lief Apparatus) in the Treatment of Headache

SYNOPSIS
An apparatus which incorporates a cooling compartment encircling the head, extending down the neck, and a separate warming compartment applied to the vertex, was employed in 28 patients with recurrent headaches (20 with migraine, 7 with tension headaches, and I with cluster headaches) who had had inadequate relief from prophylactic and acute medications. This Migra-lief apparatus reduced severity of headache in 15 of the migraine patients, 6 of the tension headache patients, and in the one cluster headache patient.     

Treating early versus treating mild: timing of migraine prescription medications among patients with diagnosed migraine

INTRODUCTION: Although research suggests that early treatment of migraine headache when the pain is mild results in better outcomes for patients, many patients delay taking their acute-migraine medication until their headaches are moderate or severe. Understanding when and why patients use their migraine medications is an important first step to improve migraine management. METHODS: A prospective observational study, conducted at a major national retail pharmacy chain with stores across the United States between April 2001 and November 2002, enrolled men and women between 18 and 55 years of age with a physician diagnosis of migraine with or without aura. Baseline data on 690 patients included patient demographics, migraine history, medication use, tendency to avoid or delay treatment of a migraine attack, and reasons for delaying treatment. Reasons for delaying treatment were assessed via a checklist of nine potential reasons. In the follow-up survey completed after treatment of the next migraine attack, patients reported the timing of medication use in relation to pain onset and the severity of the migraine headache at the time they took the medication. RESULTS: Despite the severity of their typical migraine attacks, approximately 49% of the respondents answered, "yes" to the question, "Do you often avoid or delay taking your migraine medications when you start to experience a migraine attack?" The two most common rationales for avoiding or delaying treatment were "wanting to wait and see if it is really a migraine attack" (69%) followed by "only want to take medications if it is a severe attack" (46%). In the follow-up survey, regardless of medication used, about 85% of patients did not treat their next migraine attack until the headache pain was moderate or severe, although 74% treated within 1 hour of pain onset. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patients with migraine often delay their treatment until they have identified their attack as a migraine. In addition, while many patients treated their follow-up headache early, they did not treat when the pain was mild. This suggests that there is an opportunity for physicians to educate their migraine patients on how to differentiate migraine from other headache types and about when and how to use their acute-migraine medication.     

Vagus nerve stimulation relieves chronic refractory migraine and cluster headaches

Anticonvulsant and antidepressant medications have demonstrated efficacy in migraine treatment. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an effective treatment for drug-refractory epilepsy and possibly depression and it also has documented analgesic effects. These observations suggested a possible role for VNS in treating severe refractory headaches, and led to a trial of VNS in patients with such headaches. VNS was implanted in four men and two women with disabling chronic cluster and migraine headaches. In one man and one woman with chronic migraines VNS produced dramatic improvement with restoration of ability to work. Two patients with chronic cluster headaches had significant improvement of their headaches. VNS was well tolerated in five patients, while one developed nausea even at the lowest current strength. In conclusion, VNS may be an effective therapy for intractable chronic migraine and cluster headaches and deserves further trials.     

Women's issues of migraine in tertiary care

OBJECTIVES: To document the frequency and types of symptoms of migraine in a large group of female migraineurs in tertiary care. Background.-Hormonal changes remain a significant accompaniment in the life cycle of the female migraineur. Little is documented on the relationship of women's issues to other features of migraine or to the lives of patients with migraine. Successful management of migraine mandates attention to women's issues from menarche to beyond menopause. The more information available to this end, the more confidently the clinician can prognosticate, guide, and treat the female patient. METHODS: Women's issues were evaluated in 504 women with migraine diagnosed according to the criteria of the International Headache Society (codes 1.1 and 1.2). The variables graded on a scale of 0 to 3 at the initial visit included premenstrual syndrome, menopausal symptoms, use of birth control pills, use of hormone replacement therapy, hormonal triggering of headaches, worsening of headaches with birth control pills or hormone replacement therapy, headaches with menses only, headaches with menses and at other times, headaches in pregnancy, headaches unchanged in pregnancy, headaches worse in pregnancy, and headaches better in pregnancy. These variables were stratified by age and headache diagnosis. RESULTS: Premenstrual syndrome was reported in 68.7% of patients, menopausal symptoms in 29.0%, and headaches attributed to birth control pills or hormone replacement therapy in 24.4% of patients. Sixty-four point nine percent of women had headaches with menses as well as at other times, while 3.4% of women had headaches exclusively with menses. A pregnancy was reported in 61.3% of the women; 20.4% did not experience headache in pregnancy. Of the 79.6% who did experience headache, 17.8% reported that headaches improved in pregnancy, 27.8% reported headaches to be unchanged, and 34% reported a worsening of headaches. Hormone replacement therapy or birth control pills triggered headaches in 64% of the study group. Patients with 100% aura were significantly different from patients with 0% aura, being less likely to have headaches worsening with birth control pills or hormone replacement therapy (P <.01) and more likely to have headaches occurring during pregnancy (P <.05). When patients with 100% aura were matched for age, headache frequency, use of birth control pills or hormone replacement therapy, and use of prophylactic medications with patients having 0% aura, the former were significantly less likely to have menopausal symptoms (P <.05), less likely to have headaches worsening with birth control pills or hormone replacement therapy (P <.01), and more likely to have headaches occurring only during pregnancy (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a documentation of women's issues in a large cohort of patients. Stratification by headache type, presence of aura, and age refine the study.     

Cluster and related headaches

The disorders described in this article are relatively rare, but probably are more common than previously thought. Because these disorders cause significant pain and disability and treatment response differs from that of migraine, tension-type, and cluster headaches, recognition is essential. Table 1 lists the important clinical features of these syndromes and contrasts them with cluster headache, the disorder for which they are often confused.     

Clinical features of unilateral headaches beyond migraine and cluster headache and their response to indomethacin

The majority of previous studies on unilateral headaches beyond migraine and cluster headache have focussed on certain disorders such as paroxysmal hemicrania, SUNCT and primary stabbing headache. We assessed headache characteristics, importance of neuroimaging and response to indomethacin in an unselected series of uncommon unilateral headaches. We investigated all consecutive patients presented with unilateral headaches not fulfilling ICHD-II criteria of migraine and cluster headache. Patients underwent cranial magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography as well as an indo-test, i.e. oral indomethacin 75 mg b.i.d. for 3 days. Among 63 patients we diagnosed primary stabbing headache in 12 patients, (probable) paroxysmal hemicrania in 6 and tension-type headache in 3 patients. One patient each had probable SUNCT, new daily persistent headache and nasociliary neuralgia. Eight patients had a secondary headache and 31 could not be classified according to ICDH-II. Imaging revealed lesions causally related to the headache in 8 patients. Indo-test achieved full remission of headache in 13 of 51 patients. At follow-up 11 ± 3 months after the first visit 29% of the patients were headache-free for ≥3 months. In conclusion, almost half of the patients presented with unilateral headaches beyond migraine and cluster headache cannot be classified according to ICHD-II. Among classifiable headaches primary stabbing headache was the most common. Imaging should be considered to rule out secondary headaches. The course is favourable in one third of the patients.     

Reversible cognitive decline accompanies migraine and cluster headaches

Vascular headaches, including migraine, cluster, and migrainous transformation to chronic daily headaches, are disabling. During and shortly after headache intervals, difficulties are reported in concentration, comprehension, and communication, not accounted for by nausea, photophobia, or sonophobia. These interfere with interpersonal relations and performance at work with economic loss. The hypothesis tested and reported here is that cognitive impairments comprise an important part of vascular headache diatheses. One hundred ninety-six otherwise normative subjects suffering from migraine or cluster, but not tension-type, headaches (136 women, 63 men; mean age, 46 years) participated in an outpatient prospective trial. One hundred thirty-three patients had migraine without aura, 39 migraine with aura, 11 periodic cluster (by IHS criteria), and 13 had migrainous transformation into chronic daily headaches. Neuropsychological testing was compared with and without headaches, by combined Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination (CCSE), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). During headache intervals, significant decline was measured in both CCSE and MMSE scores (P <. 001) without HDRS change in all types of vascular headache and independent of headache severity, which often improved, or associated physical symptoms. Cognitive decline was promptly relieved by serotonin agonists and sleep. Disorders of cerebral serotoninergic projection systems appear to cause these reversible cognitive impairments.     

fficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Dihydroergotamine Nasal Spray as Monotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Migraine

Recently, a new nasal spray formulation of dihydroergotamine was developed which facilitates at-home treatment of migraine. We studied the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dihydroergotamine nasal spray as monotherapy in the acute treatment of classic and common migraine in two, identical, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Of the 229 patients enrolled, 206 (102 dihydroergotamine nasal spray, 104 placebo) were included in the intent-to-treat analyses; 182 treated two headaches and 24 treated one headache. Based on both the patients' and physicians' ratings, dihydroergotamine nasal spray was significantly superior to placebo for reducing the severity of headache pain in both studies, and in relieving nausea in Study 2. The onset of significant efficacy with dihydroergotamine nasal spray compared to that with placebo for both severity of headache pain and relief of nausea occurred at I hour in Study 2 and at 3 hours in Study 1. Dihydroergotamine nasal spray was also significantly superior to placebo for the relief of headache pain in both studies. Based on the physicians' global evaluations of treatment efficacy for headache pain, 71% of the dihydroergotamine-treated patients in Study 2 and 59% of their counterparts in Study 1 were considered to be responders. The dihydroergotamine-treated patients had less newly-occurring vomiting than the placebo-treated patients. The majority of adverse events reported by the dihydroergotamine-treated patients were nasopharyngeal. The results demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dihydroergotamine nasal spray as monotherapy in the treatment of acute migraine attacks.     

Cephalalgiaphobia: a possible specific phobia of illness

Psychiatric comorbidity, mainly anxiety and depression, are common in chronic migraine (CM). Phobias are reported by half of CM patients. Phobic avoidance associated with fear of headache or migraine attack has never been adequately described. We describe 12 migraine patients with particular phobic-avoidant behaviours related to their headache attacks, which we classified as a specific illness phobia, coined as cephalalgiaphobia. All patients were women, mean age 42, and all had a migraine diagnosis (11 CM, all overused acute medications). Patients had either a phobia of a headache attack during a pain-free state or a phobia of pain worsening during mild headache episodes. Patients overused acute medication as phobic avoidance. It is a significant problem, associated with distress and impairment, interfering with medical care. Cephalalgiaphobia is a possible specific phobia of illness, possibly linked to progression of migraine to CM and to acute medication overuse headache.     

Disability is the major determinant of the severity of depressive symptoms in primary headaches but not in low back pain

Pain syndromes are often associated with depression. In a prospective study we analysed if determinants of depression differ among patients with different primary headaches and between headaches and non-headache pain. During a 2-year period between 1 February 2002 and 31 January 2004, 635 subjects (migraine n = 231; tension-type headache n = 176; cluster headache n = 11; patients with low back pain n = 103; and healthy subjects n = 114) seen by two neurologists filled in a questionnaire on pain characteristics, the MIDAS questionnaire and the Beck Depression Inventory. A multivariate general regression model was used to identify independent predictors of the severity of depressive symptoms. Pain was most frequent in chronic tension-type headache and most intense in the cluster subgroup (P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA). In univariate tests gender, age, pain frequency, pain intensity and disability were all significantly associated with the severity of depressive symptoms. In the multivariate model disability was the most important independent determinant of the severity of depressive symptoms in the pooled headache group as well as in the migraine and tension-type headache subgroups. In contrast to patients with headache, pain frequency and pain intensity were the significant independent predictors of the severity of depressive symptoms in patients with low back pain. In a multivariate model, after controlling for other factors, determinants of the severity of depressive symptoms were different in headache and non-headache pain subjects, suggesting a different mechanism for developing depression in primary headaches and in other pain syndromes.     

Clinical characteristics of tension-type headache and migraine in adolescents: a student-based study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Adolescent headaches, particularly migraine, might present with different features from adult headaches. The objectives of this study were to investigate the characteristics of tension-type headache and migraine, to find the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic criteria of the IHS classification according to age and gender. METHODS: A multistep, stratified, cluster sampling method was used for subject selection. The estimated sample size was 2387. The study was conducted in two phases: the questionnaire and the face to face interview phases. During the semistructured interview, a clinical diagnosis has been made and clinical characteristics have been recorded. RESULTS: All headaches fulfilled the criteria of duration. The most common feature of migraine was moderate to severe (92.4%), pulsating pain (79.2%). For ETTH, bilateral localization (91.3%) and mild to moderate pain intensity (90.6%) were the most common features. Younger adolescents showed mixed headache characteristics. Highest sensitivities for migraine were duration (100%), moderate to severe pain (92.4%), and pulsating quality of pain (79.2%). Vomiting, trigger factors food and alcohol had a high specificity for migraine. CONCLUSIONS: Our data strongly support continuum hypothesis. In early adolescence headaches might present with mixed headache characteristics. Age and gender have some influence on headache characteristics, particularly on migraine. The sensitivity and specificity of case definition criteria of ICHD-2 for adolescent migraine is moderate and need to be reconsidered.     

Somatostatin infusion withdrawal: a study of patients with migraine,cluster headache and healthy volunteers

Migraine and cluster headache are the most common disabling primary headache syndromes and are typically episodic. A reliable method of triggering such headache attacks facilitates the study and treatment of these disorders. There is sufficient clinical and laboratory evidence to suggest that somatostatin withdrawal may be a useful way of triggering headache. We studied 15 subjects, eight migraineurs, four cluster headache sufferers and three healthy controls. Each subject had a standard somatostatin infusion, 250 microg/h for 3.5h. Subjects were followed for 24h post-infusion. Growth hormone was suppressed in each subject demonstrating a biologically active infusion of somatostatin. None of the non-headache sufferers had pain. Seven of eight migraine sufferers had no immediate headache and no delayed headache. One migraineur experienced short lasting headache with no migrainous features. Three of four patients with cluster headache had no significant pain with the infusion, while one had pain after 1h. The results suggest that somatostatin infusion is not a reliable way to produce headache in experimental settings in either migraine or cluster headache. The data do not exclude a role for somatostatinergic mechanisms in primary headache.     

The Relationship of Locus of Control and PsychosociaI-Behavioral Response in Chronic Headache

It has been suggested that patients' perceptions of the impact chronic headache has on their lives as well as perceived control of their headaches may be associated with the intensity, duration, and exacerbation of pain they experience. The present study examined associations among International Headache Society (IHS) diagnostic category, pain characteristics such as severity and duration, perceived impact and control of headaches, and adaptive response. Two hundred twenty-five patients with migraine, tension-type, or combined migraine and tension-type headache served as subjects. General activity level was related to IHS diagnosis, with migraine headache patients reporting that they are more active than tension-type headache patients (F(2, 196) = 5.69, P < .01). Headache locus of control was not significantly related to IHS diagnosis, however external headache locus of control was significantly related to headache intensity (r = .32, P < .001, r = .25, P < .001), as well as to patients' perceptions of the extent to which pain interfered with various domains of their lives (r = .33, P < .001, r = .28, P < .001), and adaptive response (F(6, 402) = 4.68, P < .001). It appeared that perceived control over headaches and perceived impact of headaches were not related to IHS diagnostic category and were not strongly related to each other, but were related to headache severity.     

Cluster headache pharmacotherapy

Cluster headache is a well-known primary headache syndrome with a prevalence of about 5/10,000 of the adult population, making it much less common than migraine. Diagnostic terms such as histaminic cephalalgia, Horton's headache and ciliary neuralgia have been used for what is now known as cluster headache. This disorder can be differentiated from migraine by clinical and pathophysiologic features. Cluster headache also exhibits a differing therapeutic response to medications when compared with migraine. The pharmacologic treatment of cluster is reviewed in this article. In contrast to migraine, men are 3-4 times more likely to be diagnosed with cluster headache than women, and the cluster headache population is older. Cluster attacks are known for their brief intense unilateral excruciating pain during susceptible periods known as cluster periods, which typically last weeks. Attack-free months generally follow. Pain is experienced in the distribution of the trigeminal nerve, with unilateral autonomic features. Most patients are successfully managed with medical therapy. Medication management can be divided into abortive treatments for an ongoing attack and prophylactic treatment. Prophylaxis aims to induce and maintain a remission. There are a variety of different medications for abortive and prophylactic therapy, accompanied by a variable amount of evidence-based medicine. For patients refractory to medical management, interventional procedures are available as a last resort. Most procedures are directed against the sensory trigeminal nerve and associated ganglia, eg, anesthetizing the sphenopalatine ganglion.     

Transformation of Episodic Migraine Into Daily Headache: Analysis of Factors

SYNOPSIS
Seventy-six percent of patients with daily headaches were found to have a history of episodic migraine in the past, more than half of them hormone dependent headache such as menstrual migraine. Various factors possibly influencing the transformation of episodic migraine into daily headaches were analyzed in a series of 61 patients who presented with daily headaches. Abnormal personality profile, especially neuroticism including depression, excessive stress, excessive use of medications such as caffeine containing analgesics, narcotic analgesics and ergotamine, and development of hypertension were found to be significant in the transformation of episodic migraine into daily headache.
The problem of daily headache is discussed. It is suggested that the majority of daily headaches are a continuum of episodic migraine, influenced and perpetuated by various factors such as neuroticism, excessive medication, stress, and development of hypertension. It is pointed out that diagnosis of tension headache under those circumstances is not justified.