Comparative evaluation of the QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 and 3.0 (bDNA) assays and the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 test for the quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma

HIV-1 RNA measurements from 84 plasma specimens obtained with the QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 and 3.0 (bDNA) assays (Chiron Diagnostics, Emeryville, CA) and with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, version 1.5 with ultra-sensitive specimen preparation (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ) were compared. The absolute RNA values of tested specimens differed significantly between bDNA 2.0 and bDNA 3.0 or Monitor v1.5 measurements (Wilcoxon signed-rank test P<0.001). Results generated with bDNA 3.0 or with Monitor v1.5 were approximately twofold greater than those generated with bDNA 2.0, with smaller differences at higher HIV-1 RNA levels and greater differences at RNA levels below 1000 copies per ml. Although highly correlated (r=0.92 and 0.86, respectively), viral load data generated with bDNA 2.0 and either bDNA 3.0 or Monitor v1.5 were in poor agreement. Concordant results (difference in log(10) copies per ml <0.5) were found at frequencies of 80% for bDNA 2.0 and bDNA 3.0 and only at 58.5% for bDNA 2.0 and Monitor v1.5. In contrast, bDNA 3.0 and Monitor v1.5 measurements were highly correlated (r=0.96) and in good agreement (92.7%).     

Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) DNA and RNA sequences in HIV-1 antibody-positive blood donors in Uganda by the Roche AMPLICOR assay.

The ability of commercially available PCR-based assays to accurately detect or quantitate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) DNA or RNA in individuals predominantly infected with HIV-1 subtypes A and D is not known. Therefore, peripheral leukocytes from 43 individuals in Kampala, Uganda, positive for HIV by the Western blot (immunoblot) assay were tested by using the Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 assay for the detection of DNA gag sequences. Plasma from these same individuals was tested by using the Roche HIV-1 AMPLICOR MONITOR HIV-1 assay for the quantitation of HIV-1 RNA gag sequences. In addition, peripheral leukocytes were tested for HIV-1 DNA by using a lower annealing temperature or a different primer pair for the HIV-1 pol region. The proportions of individuals with detectable HIV-1 DNA and RNA gag sequences by the Roche assays were 74 and 90%, respectively. The proportions positive for HIV-1 DNA sequences by using a 50 degrees C annealing temperature or the pol primer pair were 71 and 98%, respectively. In summary, the standard Roche assay did not detect HIV-1 DNA sequences in a significant number of HIV-1-infected individuals in Uganda. However, use of a pol primer pair increased the sensitivity of the assay to 98%. The sensitivity of the Roche AMPLICOR MONITOR assay for the detection and quantitation of HIV-1 RNA sequences was significantly higher than that of the DNA-based assay, but the efficiency of the assay, and hence, the accuracy of the values obtained with RNA, is not known. Modifications to existing assays are needed to enhance the sensitivities and accuracies of these commercially available assays for use in developing countries where non-B HIV-1 subtypes predominate.     

Assessment of viral loads in patients with chronic hepatitis C with AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 1.0, COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0, and QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA version 2.0 assays

The correlation between response to antiviral therapy and pretreatment viral load in patients with chronic hepatitis C has prompted the development of quantitative assays to measure viral load. The aim of our study was to assess the clinical relevance of the newly developed semiautomated PCR system COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0 in comparison with (i) the AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 1.0 assay, which underestimates RNA concentration of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 2 to 6, and (ii) the QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA version 2.0 assay, which achieves equivalent quantification for each HCV genotype, with samples from 174 patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C before therapy. The level and range of quantification measured with AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 1.0 were 1 log lower than when measured with the COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0, at 0.261 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml (range, 0.001 x 10(6) to 2.50 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml) and 4.032 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml (range, 0.026 x 10(6) to 72.6 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml), respectively. The two assays showed a poor correlation (r(2) = 0.175). The level and range of quantification were similar when measured with the COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0 and QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA version 2.0 assays, at 3.03 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml (range, 0.023 x 10(6) to 72.6 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml) and 4.91 Meq/ml (range, 0.200 to 49.5 Meq/ml), respectively. The two assays showed a strong correlation (r(2) = 0. 686) for each HCV genotype. The duration of treatment (6 or 12 months) is modulated according to HCV genotype and viral load. Our results indicate that COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0 and QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA version 2.0 assays showing an equal dynamic range for each HCV genotype are suitable tools to assess patients before therapy.     

Assessment of agreement between the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR test versions 1.0 and 1.5

The agreement of the microwell plate AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.0 (MWP 1.0), the microwell plate AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5 (MWP 1.5), and the COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5 (COBAS 1.5) tests was evaluated using clinical specimens and well-characterized control material. Two hundred patient plasma specimens and a panel of known human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtypes were tested. All data were log(10) transformed prior to analysis. The 95% limits of agreement for the three tests at the average of 3.66 log(10) copies/ml were +/- 0.28 log(10), +/- 0.34 log(10), and +/- 0.34 log(10) copies/ml for MWP 1.0-MWP 1.5, MWP 1.0-COBAS 1.5, and MWP 1.5-COBAS 1.5, respectively. Ten specimens (6.1%) had differences exceeding the limits of agreement for the MWP 1.0 and MWP 1.5 tests. Correlation coefficients among the three tests were high (r >or=0.96). The viral-load values obtained with the MWP 1.0 test were only 2.1% higher on average than those measured with the MWP 1.5 test and 1.6% higher than those seen with the COBAS 1.5 test. The MWP 1.5 test values were 0.8% higher than the COBAS 1.5 test values. Overall, there was less agreement among the different tests for viral-load values near the lower limit of quantification. The MWP 1.0 test underquantified subtypes A, E, F, G, and H by 1.0 to 2.0 log(10) copies/ml; this problem was not observed with the MWP 1.5 test. The close agreement among the results obtained with the different test versions and formats suggests that it is not necessary to reestablish a baseline viral load when changing AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR tests, unless the patient is known to be infected with a non-B subtype.     

Quantification of HIV-1 group M (subtypes A-G) and group O by the LCx HIV RNA quantitative assay

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genetic diversity presents a challenge to nucleic acid-based assays with regard to sensitivity of detection and accuracy of quantification. The Abbott LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay (LCx(R) HIV assay), a competitive RT-PCR targeting the pol integrase region, was evaluated using a panel of 297 HIV-1 seropositive plasma samples from Cameroon, Uganda, Brazil, Thailand, Spain, Argentina and South Africa. The panel included group M subtypes A-G, mosaics, and group O based on sequence analysis of gag p24, pol integrase, and env gp41. The LCx HIV assay quantified 290 (97.6%) of the samples, including all the group O samples tested. In comparison, the Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR test versions 1.0 and 1.5 quantified 67.3 and 94.6% of the samples, respectively. No group O specimens were quantified by either version of AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR. Seven specimens were below the detectable limits of all the three assays. The LCx HIV assay had fewer nucleotide mismatches at primer/probe binding sites as compared with both AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR tests. The high degree of nucleotide conservation within the pol target region enables the LCx HIV assay to efficiently quantify the HIV-1 subtypes A-G and the most genetically diverse HIV-1, group O.     

Comparison of two amplification technologies for detection and quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in the female genital tract. Division of AIDS Treatment Research Initiative 009 Study Team

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels in female genital tract and peripheral blood samples were compared using two commercial amplification technologies: the Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR test and either the Organon Teknika nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA-QT) assay or the NucliSens assay. Estimates of HIV-1 RNA copy number were derived from internal kit standards and analyzed unadjusted and adjusted to a common set of external standards. We found a discordance rate of approximately 18% between the two technologies for the detection of HIV-1 in either the genital tract or peripheral blood samples. Detection discordance was not consistent among specimens or among women. There were no significant differences in adjusted or unadjusted estimates of HIV-1 RNA copy number in the genital tract samples using the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR test and either the NASBA-QT assay or the NucliSens assay. In addition, the estimated HIV-1 RNA copy number in peripheral blood samples did not differ when tested with the NucliSens assay and the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR test using kit standards. However, there was a significant difference in estimated RNA copy number between the NASBA-QT assay and the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR test for internal kit standards, which, as we have previously shown, was eliminated after adjustment with the external standards. Our results suggest that the Roche and Organon Teknika assays are equivalent for quantifying HIV-1 RNA in female genital tract specimens, although variation in detection does exist.     

A modified ultrasensitive assay to detect quantified HIV-1 RNA of fewer than 50 copies per milliliter

We compared the sensitivity and specificity of versions 1.0 and 1.5 and a modified version 1.5 of the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR ultrasensitive RNA assay (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) by using a virus stock dilution series and plasma samples from HIV-1-infected and uninfected subjects. The modified assay was linear and consistently positive down to 12 copies per milliliter vs 25 copies per milliliter for the other 2 assays. Versions 1.0, 1.5, and modified 1.5, respectively, detected 9 (23%) of 39, 11 (28%) of 40, and 43 (61%) of 71 replicates of a 4-copy-number and 11 (28%) of 40, 17 (46%) of 37, and 88 (90%) of 98 replicates of a 10-copy-number standard. Of 44 patient samples with undetectable levels using version 1.0, 32 (73%) had detectable levels on the modified assay, and 5 (25%) of 20 had detectable levels on version 1.5. None of the assays detected HIV-1 RNA in HIV-1 antibody-negative samples. The modified version 1.5 of the RNA assay is more sensitive for detecting HIV-1 RNA in significantly more patients than are versions 1.0 and 1.5.     

Quality of human immunodeficiency virus viral load testing in Australia

This study determined the proficiencies of laboratories measuring human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viral loads and the accuracies of two assays used for HIV-1 viral load measurement in Australia and investigated the variability of the new versions of these assays. Quality assessment program panels containing (i) dilutions of HIV-1 subtype B, (ii) replicates of identical samples of HIV-1 subtype B, and (iii) samples of subtype E and B were tested by laboratories. Total variability (within and between laboratories) was tested with quality control samples. The coefficients of variation (CVs) for the Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version (v) 1.0 and Chiron Quantiplex bDNA 2.0 assays ranged from 53 to 87% and 22 to 31%, respectively. The widespread occurrence of invalid runs with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay was identified. The CVs of the new versions of the assays were 82 to 86% for the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v 1.5 assay and 16 to 23% for the Quantiplex bDNA 3.0 assay. For virus dilution samples, all but 5 of 19 laboratories obtained results within 2 standard deviations of the mean. The Quantiplex bDNA 2.0 assay reported values lower than those reported by the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.0 assay for samples containing HIV-1 subtype B, whereas the reverse was true for subtype E. Identification and resolution of the problem of invalid runs markedly improved the quality of HIV-1 viral load testing. The variability observed between laboratories and between assays, even the most recent versions, dictates that monitoring of viral load in an individual should always be by the same laboratory and by the same assay. Results for an individual which differ by less than 0.5 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copy number/ml should not be considered clinically significant.     

Ultrasensitive Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay for Quantitation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA in Plasma

With the recent introduction of combination therapy, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels in plasma have been dramatically reduced, frequently to below the limit of quantitation (400 copies/ml of plasma) of the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test (Roche Diagnostic Systems). To achieve enhanced sensitivity of the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, a modified specimen preparation procedure that allows input of RNA from 10-fold more plasma per amplification reaction was developed. This “ultrasensitive” method allows the accurate quantitation of plasma HIV-1 RNA levels as low as 50 copies/ml. A precision study yielded average within-run and between-run coefficients of variation (CV) of 24.8 and 9.6%, respectively. A multicenter reproducibility study demonstrated that the laboratory-to-laboratory reproducibility of this assay is good, with an average CV of 32%. The linear range of this test is between 50 and 50,000 copies/ml of plasma. RNA concentrations measured by the ultrasensitive and standard HIV-1 MONITOR tests exhibited good agreement within the shared linear range of the two methods. The two measurements were within a factor of 2 for 91% of the specimens tested, with the concentration measured by the ultrasensitive method being only slightly lower (median, 22% lower). Preliminary studies suggest that this assay will prove to be useful for predicting the stability of viral suppression in patients whose RNA levels drop below 400 copies/ml in response to highly active antiretroviral therapy.

The measurement of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels has become an important tool for identifying individuals likely to benefit from antiretroviral therapy (12, 15, 16, 21, 26, 29) as well as monitoring patients on therapy (5, 6, 9, 12, 18, 20, 23) and is now regarded as standard medical practice for managing the treatment of HIV-1-infected individuals (1–4, 22, 25, 28). Recently, the use of combination therapy resulted in rapid and potent antiretroviral and immunological effects which lead to sharp declines in the plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration, frequently to an undetectable level (6, 18, 23). A more sensitive method with a lower detection limit for plasma HIV-1 RNA is therefore required.The AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in plasma, is intended to be used as an indicator of disease prognosis in conjunction with other laboratory markers and clinical presentation and as an aid in assessing the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy. The lower limit of quantitation of the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test is 400 RNA copies/ml of plasma (24). We introduce here a modified specimen preparation procedure (17, 27) that enhances the sensitivity of the standard MONITOR test. Increased sensitivity is obtained by increasing the input plasma volume by a factor of 2.5, performing high-speed centrifugation to concentrate the virus particles from the plasma, and reducing the final resuspension volume for the recovered nucleic acid by a factor of 4. If centrifugation yields 100% recovery of virus, this modified, ultrasensitive procedure should result in a 10-fold increase in the analytical sensitivity of the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, linear range, reproducibility, and precision of the ultrasensitive test. We also analyzed the correlation between RNA concentrations measured by the ultrasensitive and the standard HIV-1 MONITOR Tests.     

Multicenter comparison of Roche COBAS AMPLICOR MONITOR version 1.5, Organon Teknika NucliSens QT with Extractor, and Bayer Quantiplex version 3.0 for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma

The performance and characteristics of Roche COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5 (CA MONITOR 1.5) UltraSensitive (usCA MONITOR 1. 5) and Standard (stCA MONITOR 1.5) procedures, Organon Teknika NucliSens HIV-1 RNA QT with Extractor (NucliSens), and Bayer Quantiplex HIV RNA version 3.0 (bDNA 3.0) were compared in a multicenter trial. Samples used in this study included 460 plasma specimens from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV-1)-infected persons, 100 plasma specimens from HIV antibody (anti-HIV)-negative persons, and culture supernatants of HIV-1 subtype A to E isolates diluted in anti-HIV-negative plasma. Overall, bDNA 3.0 showed the least variation in RNA measures upon repeat testing. For the Roche assays, usCA MONITOR 1.5 displayed less variation in RNA measures than stCA MONITOR 1.5. NucliSens, at an input volume of 2 ml, showed the best sensitivity. Deming regression analysis indicated that the results of all three assays were significantly correlated (P < 0.0001). However, the mean difference in values between CA MONITOR 1.5 and bDNA 3.0 (0.274 log(10) RNA copies/ml; 95% confidence interval, 0.192 to 0.356) was significantly different from 0, indicating that CA MONITOR 1.5 values were regularly higher than bDNA 3.0 values. Upon testing of 100 anti-HIV-negative plasma specimens, usCA MONITOR 1.5 and NucliSens displayed 100% specificity, while bDNA 3.0 showed 98% specificity. NucliSens quantified 2 of 10 non-subtype B viral isolates at 1 log(10) lower than both CA MONITOR 1.5 and bDNA 3.0. For NucliSens, testing of specimens with greater than 1,000 RNA copies/ml at input volumes of 0.1, 0.2, and 2.0 ml did not affect the quality of results. Additional factors differing between assays included specimen throughput and volume requirements, limit of detection, ease of execution, instrument work space, and costs of disposal. These characteristics, along with assay performance, should be considered when one is selecting a viral load assay.     

Multicenter evaluation of the performance characteristics of the NucliSens HIV-1 QT assay used for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA

The analytical performance of the NucliSens HIV-1 QT assay, a highly sensitive test based on nucleic acid sequence-based amplification technology, was evaluated in a multicenter trial. Assay specificity was evaluated with 502 plasma (EDTA) specimens from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-seronegative volunteer donors. No HIV-1 RNA was reported in any of the donor specimens. Analytical sensitivity and reproducibility were estimated with panels prepared from a high-titer well-characterized HIV-1 RNA stock (5.84 x 10(8) RNA copies/ml). The assay's dynamic range was linear from 10(6) to 10(1) HIV-1 RNA copies, with a lower detectable limit of 25 copies/ml and a 95% detection rate of 176 copies/ml. Sensitivity of the assay to detect HIV-1 RNA in clinical specimens from patients (n = 101) and in commercially available or prepared panels (n = 24) was compared with NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT (an earlier version of NucliSens HIV-1 QT) and with the Food and Drug Administration-approved standard and ultrasensitive AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR, version 1.0, assays. Detection of HIV-1 RNA was reproducible over a 5-log range (mean standard deviation = 0.15 log). The NucliSens and the standard AMPLICOR assays were equivalent in detection of HIV-1 RNA (concentration, 10(3) to 10(5) copies/ml) in 57 clinical specimens. The NucliSens assay was more sensitive in detecting HIV-1 RNA at lower concentrations (相似文献   

Fully automated quantification of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 RNA in human plasma by the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan system.

BACKGROUND: HIV-1 RNA is a key parameter for reliable diagnosis and treatment of HIV-1 infection. The determination of HIV-1 RNA reduces the pre-seroconversion period in the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection and supports clinical management of HIV-1-infected patients. OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test combines automated extraction of total nucleic acids on the COBAS AmpliPrep Instrument with real-time PCR on the COBAS TaqMan Analyzer, thus greatly reducing hands-on time during sample preparation and amplification/detection. The test was evaluated for sensitivity, dynamic range, precision, subtype inclusivity, interfering substances, diagnostic and analytical specificity, as well as correlation with three other commercial tests for HIV-1 RNA quantification. RESULTS: The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test demonstrated an assay sensitivity of 40 copies/mL, a greater than 5 log(10) measuring range of 40-1.0E+07 copies/mL (1.6-7.0 log(10)) and a reliable determination of HIV-1 group M and N subtypes in EDTA plasma. Quantification results were highly correlated with those obtained by the COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test v1.5, the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test v1.5 and the VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 assay. CONCLUSIONS: The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test excellently satisfies the requirements for reliable quantification of HIV-1 RNA in clinical specimens by a broad linear measuring range and a fully automated quantification procedure. It is highly appropriate for therapy monitoring and routine management of HIV-1 infection.     

Multicenter evaluation of methods to quantitate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in seminal plasma

We have evaluated two commercially available kits (AMPLICOR MONITOR [Roche] and NASBA HIV-1 QT or NucliSens HIV-1 QT [Organon Teknika]) and two noncommercial methods for the accurate quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in seminal plasma. The same panels of coded specimens were tested on four separate occasions. Laboratories using the commercial assays employed silica beads to isolate HIV-1 RNA, which removed inhibitory factors sometimes found in seminal plasma. Sensitivities and specificities, respectively, for each assay were as follows: AMPLICOR MONITOR, 100 and 73%; NASBA HIV-1 QT, 84 and 100%; NucliSens HIV-1 QT, 99 and 98%; and noncommercial assays, 91 and 73%. When results from the laboratory that was inexperienced with the silica bead extraction method were excluded from the analysis, specificity for the Roche assay increased to 100%. The commercial assays demonstrated highly reproducible results, with intra-assay standard deviations (measured in log(10) RNA copies/milliliter of seminal plasma) ranging from 0.11 to 0.32; those of the noncommercial assays ranged from 0.12 to 0.75. Differences in mean estimated HIV-1 RNA concentrations were 相似文献   

Evaluation of the Nuclisens HIV-1 QT Assay for Quantitation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA Levels in Plasma

Nuclisens HIV-1 QT is a new version of the NASBA HIV-1 QT assay for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in plasma. The specificity of this assay was 100% in one laboratory and 99%—with nonrepeatability of the initial false positive—in another. The test was linear between 2.0 and 6.0 log RNA copies per ml. According to the input HIV-1 RNA concentration, accuracy varied from −0.11 to +0.10 log RNA copy per ml and precision varied from 0.66 to 0.14 log RNA copy per ml. Reproducibility decreased when the HIV-1 RNA level was near the lower limit of quantitation of the test. HIV-1 RNA could be quantitated by Nuclisens HIV-1 QT in 36% (laboratory 1) and 24% (laboratory 2) of clinical samples with HIV-1 RNA levels lower than the lower limit of quantitation by NASBA HIV-1 QT. Nuclisens HIV-1 QT was not suitable for measurement of RNA from clade G and group O HIV-1 strains.     

Multicenter evaluation of the Bayer VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 assay: analytical and clinical performance.

BACKGROUND: The use of quantitative HIV-1 RNA assays is part of the standard of care for the management of HIV-1-infected individuals. OBJECTIVE: The Bayer VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 Assay (bDNA) was evaluated for reproducibility, linearity, limits of detection and quantitation, effects of potentially interfering substances and conditions, effects of plasma collection and handling conditions, clinical sensitivity and specificity, and biologic variability. STUDY DESIGN: Anti-HIV-1-positive specimens, patient specimens containing potentially interfering substances, and anti-HIV-negative specimens were collected from several HIV clinics, blood centers, or commercial companies across the United States. Specimen panels used to evaluate nonclinical performance of the assay were prepared at Bayer Diagnostics. Bayer Assay Development personnel performed 2 of the nonclinical studies-effect of freeze-thaw cycles using 'spiked' HIV-1 RNA-positive samples and effect of other disease organisms. All other studies were conducted at 7 external sites. In some of the studies performed, specimens were tested in parallel with the Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.0 PCR Test. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The results of these studies showed that the Bayer Assay has excellent reproducibility, a broad linear range (75-500,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml), throughput of 168 patient results per two-plate run in a 22-h period, and few limitations for use. Because this test is designed for use only in individuals who are known to be HIV-1-positive, the clinical specificity of 97.6% is adequate for its intended use. These characteristics make it an attractive method for general laboratory use of monitoring HIV-1-infected patients.     

Performance characteristics of the COBAS AMPLICOR hepatitis C virus MONITOR Test, version 2.0

We evaluated the performance characteristics of the COBAS AMPLICOR Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) MONITOR Test, version 2.0. Dilution studies using patient specimens demonstrated a lower limit of detection of 1,000 copies per milliliter. The assay was linear from 1,000 to 1 million HCV RNA copies per milliliter. Within-run precision and between-run precision were acceptable (approximately 0.100 and 0.14 SD for log10 [copies per milliliter]). A comparison of this version of the test (y), with the manual AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR Test, version 1.0 (x), yielded the following Deming regression equation: y = 1.004(+/- 0.04)x + 0.654(+/- 0.22); Sy/x?D = 0.336; n = 92; r2 = 0.846; r = 0.920. Further comparison of the COBAS version 2.0 assay (x) with the QUANTIPLEX HCV bDNA Test (y) yielded the following Deming regression equation: y = 0.943 (+/- 0.130)x + 0.473 (+/- 0.717); Sy/x?D = 0.194; n = 26; r2 = 0.600; r = 0.774. Version 2.0 detected the spectrum of HCV genotypes better than version 1.0.     

Evaluation of the clinical usefulness of COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR assay (ver2.0): Comparison with AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR assay (ver1.0) and HCV core protein level

The quantitation of serum levels of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in chronic hepatitis C has been regarded as one of the most important indicators for the outcome of interferon (IFN) therapy. The AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 1.0 (AMPLICOR v1.0) assay is widely used for the evaluation of the HCV level. A new generation assay called the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 (COBAS v2.0) assay, which is semiautomated and modified to amplify all genotypes equally, has been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the COBAS v2.0 assay in comparison with the AMPLICOR v1.0 assay and HCV core protein assay in patients with chronic hepatitis C before IFN therapy. HCV RNA was detectable in 230 cases (97.5%) and undetectable in 6 cases (2.5%) by the COBAS v2.0 assay. The RNA levels measured by the AMPLICOR v1.0 assay correlated significantly with those measured by the COBAS v2.0 assay, and the sensitivity of the new version 2.0 assay was better than that of version 1.0, especially in serotype 2. In relation to the outcome of IFN therapy, HCV RNA levels from virologically sustained responders by the AMPLICOR v1.0 assay were 82.3 +/- 22.9 kcopies/ml in serotype 1 and 36.9 +/- 13.4 kcopies/ml in serotype 2, and those from virologically nonsustained responders were 525.2 +/- 48.6 kcopies/ml in serotype 1 and 76.7 +/- 19.5 kcopies/ml in serotype 2.The rates of sustained response to <100 kcopies/ml were 34/63 (54.0%) in serotype 1 and 24/48 (50.0%) in serotype 2. A statistically significant virological response was seen in serotype 1 (P < 0.0001), but not in serotype 2. In contrast, the levels in virologically sustained responders by the COBAS v2.0 assay were 88.2 +/- 20.5 KIU/ml in serotype 1 and 136.8 +/- 40.1 KIU/ml in serotype 2, and those in virologically nonsustained responders were 608.8 +/- 48.4 KIU/ml in serotype 1 and 328.3 +/- 62.8 KIU/ml in serotype 2. The rates of sustained response to <100 KIU/ml were 33/60 (55.0%) in serotype 1 and 21/35 (60.0%) in serotype 2. Statistical significance in virological response was seen in both serotype 1 (P < 0.0001) and serotype 2 (P < 0.05). Although the sensitivity of the HCV core protein assay was lower than that with the COBAS v2.0 assay, the HCV core protein levels also correlated well with the results of the COBAS v2.0 assay. The HCV core protein levels of virologically sustained responders were 37.6 +/- 12.0 pg/ml in serotype 1, 81.3 +/- 37.0 pg/ml in serotype 2, and those of virologically nonsustained responders were 289.9 +/- 23.5 pg/ml in serotype 1, 191.4 +/- 32.1 pg/ml in serotype 2. This assay could predict the outcome of IFN therapy in both serotype 1 (P < 0.0001) and serotype 2 (P < 0.05). Thus, both the COBAS v2.0 assay and the HCV core protein assay showed that the viral load was an indicator of virologically sustained response in serotype 2 and in serotype 1.     

Comparative performance of three viral load assays on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates representing group M (subtypes A to G) and group O: LCx HIV RNA quantitative, AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5, and Quantiplex HIV-1 RNA version 3.0

The performance of the LCx HIV RNA Quantitative (LCx HIV), AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5 (MONITOR v1.5), and Quantiplex HIV-1 RNA version 3.0 (bDNA v3.0) viral load assays was evaluated with 39 viral isolates (3 A, 7 B, 6 C, 4 D, 8 E, 4 F, 1 G, 4 mosaic, and 2 group O). Quantitation across the assay dynamic ranges was assessed using serial fivefold dilutions of the viruses. In addition, sequences of gag-encoded p24 (gag p24), pol-encoded integrase, and env-encoded gp41 were analyzed to assign group and subtype and to assess nucleotide mismatches at primer and probe binding sites. For group M isolates, quantification was highly correlated among all three assays. In contrast, only the LCx HIV assay reliably quantified group O isolates. The bDNA v3.0 assay detected but consistently underquantified group O viruses, whereas the MONITOR v1.5 test failed to detect group O viruses. Analysis of target regions revealed fewer primer or probe mismatches in the LCx HIV assay than in the MONITOR v1.5 test. Consistent with the high level of nucleotide conservation is the ability of the LCx HIV assay to quantify efficiently human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group M and the genetically diverse group O.