Raising the bar of care for older people in Ontario emergency departments

flynn d.s., jennings j., moghabghab r., nancekivell t., tsang c., cleland m. & shipman-vokner k. (2010) Raising the bar of care for older people in Ontario emergency departments. International Journal of Older People Nursing 5 , 219–226
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2010.00209.x Aim. To describe the role of geriatric emergency management nurses as a catalyst for culture change in emergency department processes with the goal to improve care and outcomes of older people. Background. The changing context and literature has called for a culture change within emergency department care to integrate principles of older people care into care delivery. There is a paucity of reports describing how geriatric emergency care models bring about a broader change in culture within the entire emergency department. Methods. The Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care in Canada established a programme to place geriatric emergency management nurses into emergency departments with the goal to improve delivery of care through development of unique, site-appropriate solutions. Results. Geriatric emergency management nurses incorporate capacity building into their role to develop and strengthen the skills, instincts, abilities, process and resources of the emergency department. Care processes focus on areas of staffing, mobilization, comfort, medication, hygiene, nutrition/hydration, cognition, environment, equipment and stimulation. Multi-modal educational strategies and advocacy promote appropriate person-centred care. Improved communication among care providers at key patient transition points remains a priority system-level improvement. Conclusion. Geriatric emergency management nurses work collaboratively with the emergency department team to facilitate change in the way that emergency department care is provided to the older person experiencing health emergencies. Implications for practice. Known strategies that have been effective in improving outcomes for older people within the hospital and residential care setting can be generalized into emergency department care. Further research into the effectiveness of these strategies in this environment is recommended.     

State of the science: conservative interventions for urinary incontinence in frail community-dwelling older adults

This systematic literature review aimed to identify conservative interventions for reducing urinary incontinence (UI) in non-institutionalized frail older adults. Randomized and quasi-experimental studies published in English reporting outcomes on UI frequency, severity, or quality of life were included and rated for quality. Studies reporting improvements over 50% in UI outcomes were considered clinically significant. Seven studies with 683 participants (75% female) were eligible. Multicomponent behavioral interventions including pelvic floor muscle exercises and bladder training had the strongest evidence for reducing UI. The evidence supporting comprehensive geriatric assessment with multicomponent behavioral interventions, pattern urge response training, and toilet skills was limited. There is insufficient evidence to derive firm conclusions regarding the use of conservative interventions. Clinical trials are needed on a variety of interventions to guide practice on UI prevention and management in frail community-dwelling older adults.     

Preventive home care of frail older people: a review of recent case management studies

Preventive actions targeting community‐dwelling frail older people will be increasingly important with the growing number of very old and thereby also frail older people. This study aimed to explore and summarize the empirical literature on recent studies of case/care management interventions for community‐dwelling frail older people and especially with regard to the content of the interventions and the nurse's role and outcome of it. Very few of the interventions took either a preventive or a rehabilitative approach using psycho‐educative interventions focusing, for instance, on self‐care activities, risk prevention, health complaints management or how to preserve or strengthen social activities, community involvement and functional ability. Moreover, it was striking that very few included a family‐oriented approach also including support and education for informal caregivers. Thus it seems that the content of case/care management needs to be expanded and more influenced by a salutogenic health care perspective. Targeting frail older people seemed to benefit from a standardized two‐stage strategy for inclusion and for planning the interventions. A comprehensive geriatric assessment seemed useful as a base. Nurses, preferably trained in gerontological practice, have a key role in case/care management for frail older people. This approach calls for developing the content of case/care management so that it involves a more salutogenic, rehabilitative and family‐oriented approach. To this end it may be useful for nurses to strengthen their psychosocial skills or develop close collaboration with social workers. The outcome measures examined in this study represented one of three perspectives: the consumer's perspective, the perspective of health care consumption or the recipient's health and functional ability. Perhaps effects would be expected in all three areas and thus these should be included in evaluative studies in addition to measures for family and/or informal caregiver's strain and satisfaction.     

Transdermal and Oral Clonidine

The term geriatric syndrome is used to characterize multifactorial clinical conditions among older people which are not subsumed readily into disease entities, but which nevertheless predispose older people to disability and death. Commonly included are frailty, dementia, delirium, incontinence, falls, and dizziness. Geriatric syndromes are common among older people: in a recent survey, 50% of those aged more than 65 had one or more of these conditions. Better methods for prevention and treatment are needed, but current strategies have lacked a coherent conceptual and diagnostic framework. Prevention and interventions need to be targeted at earlier ages, with geriatrics expertise needed in the definition and operationalization of these complex entities. In this review we consolidate evidence that vascular disorders, including vascular ageing and vascular diseases, are key etiological factors of geriatric syndromes. Identifying this vascular dimension would offer opportunities for more efficient preventive strategies and mandates earlier intervention, especially for women, among whom vascular disease is often expressed more insidiously than among men. This would entail a sensitization of the health care system to the systematic detection of the syndromes, which are currently underdiagnosed. Further disentangling of the mechanisms of vascular ageing may offer therapies for vascular diseases and geriatric syndromes alike.     

Geriatric pain competencies and knowledge assessment for nurses in long term care settings

Pain in older adults is a prevalent problem that affects quality of life and challenges nurses, particularly those caring for older adults living in long term care settings. Despite the national priority of pain management, insufficient knowledge of nurses about geriatric pain is a documented barrier to effective geriatric pain management in all long term care settings. To address this knowledge gap, a website (GeriatricPain.org) was developed by the National Geriatric Pain Collaborative with a grant from the MayDay Fund to provide a single site for evidenced-based, easy-to-use, downloadable resources on pain management. This paper describes the development of the most recent addition to the website, a set of evidence-based core geriatric pain management competencies and a geriatric pain knowledge assessment, and discusses their potential uses in improving pain care for older adults. Geriatric Pain Competencies and Knowledge Assessment for Nurses in Long Term Care Settings.     

Managing Pain in the Elderly Population: Pearls and Pitfalls

While pain is a common symptom among older adults, it often is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Aging-related physiological changes, misperceptions about the use of pain medications by both patients and providers, and the lack of evidence-based clinical research on pain management in older adults are some of the reasons why pain in older adults is mismanaged. Using extrapolated evidence from pain research in younger patients, consensus statements, and best practice guidelines, this article summarizes and highlights areas of geriatric pain assessment and management that need special consideration. Some highlighted areas include 1) pain assessment in cognitively impaired patients; 2) medication choice and initiation doses; 3) duration of adequate medication trials; and 4) common medication side effects and suggested management.     

Development of Geriatric Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents Using an Expert Consensus Process

Background: The emergency department (ED) visit rate for older patients exceeds that of all age groups other than infants. The aging population will increase elder ED patient utilization to 35% to 60% of all visits. Older patients can have complex clinical presentations and be resource‐intensive. Evidence indicates that emergency physicians fail to provide consistent high‐quality care for elder ED patients, resulting in poor clinical outcomes. Objectives: The objective was to develop a consensus document, “Geriatric Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents,” by identified experts. This is a minimum set of behaviorally based performance standards that all residents should be able to demonstrate by completion of their residency training. Methods: This consensus‐based process utilized an inductive, qualitative, multiphase method to determine the minimum geriatric competencies needed by emergency medicine (EM) residents. Assessments of face validity and reliability were used throughout the project. Results: In Phase I, participants (n = 363) identified 12 domains and 300 potential competencies. In Phase II, an expert panel (n = 24) clustered the Phase I responses, resulting in eight domains and 72 competencies. In Phase III, the expert panel reduced the competencies to 26. In Phase IV, analysis of face validity and reliability yielded a 100% consensus for eight domains and 26 competencies. The domains identified were atypical presentation of disease; trauma, including falls; cognitive and behavioral disorders; emergent intervention modifications; medication management; transitions of care; pain management and palliative care; and effect of comorbid conditions. Conclusions: The Geriatric Competencies for EM Residents is a consensus document that can form the basis for EM residency curricula and assessment to meet the demands of our aging population. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:316–324 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine     

Use of Geriatrics At Your Fingertips, a pocket guide, to educate physiatrists in geriatric care

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a geriatric pocket guide, Geriatrics At Your Fingertips, may be a useful tool in educating physiatrists about the care of their older patients. DESIGN: Geriatrics At Your Fingertips was distributed through the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) to physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residents and practicing physiatrists. Two questionnaires evaluated guide use. SETTING: Two academic PM&R departments and physiatrists in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Two PM&R residency programs, members of AAPM&R's Geriatric Rehabilitation Special Interest Group (GR-SIG), and AAPM&R's membership. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of clinically useful information by residents and GR-SIG members and frequency of guide use among AAPM&R membership. RESULTS: Forty-five PM&R residents and 17 GR-SIG members reported examples of useful information. Geriatrics At Your Fingertips was requested by 483 AAPM&R members. Forty-six percent returned questionnaires (N=223). Seventy percent had used the guide at least once and 49% 4 or more times. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatrics At Your Fingertips is a useful tool with which to educate PM&R residents and physiatrists about geriatric care.     

Care of LGBTQ older adults: What geriatric nurses must know

Geriatric nurses have a responsibility to promote the health of all older adults. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) older adults are particularly vulnerable to poor health outcomes and are less likely to seek healthcare due to fear of discrimination. Despite elevated risk LGBTQ older adults are often ignored within geriatric nursing as there is little evidence to inform care. To adequately care for LGBTQ patients geriatric nurses should recognize the effects of bias, appreciate the importance of terminology, understand diversity within the LGBTQ community, advocate for the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity in admission assessments, share best practices, and advocate for increased visibility. Caring for this population may be challenging, as it will require geriatric nurses to expand their knowledge of LGBTQ health, explore their own biases, and challenge institutional norms. However, through coordinated efforts geriatric nurses can work toward improving care for LGBTQ older adults.     

Integrating long-term care concepts into baccalaureate nursing education: the road to quality geriatric health care

Increased numbers of aging Americans requires that today's health care professionals be grounded in education that focuses on patient-centered care of older adults. The growing demand for competent geriatric nurses in West Texas, led the School of Nursing (SON) at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) to conduct an in-depth analysis of its baccalaureate curriculum to determine how, when, and where care of older adults was being addressed. A task force appointed by the SON subsequently chose, as a blueprint for curricular redesign, Older Adults: Recommended Baccalaureate Competencies and Curricular Guidelines for Geriatric Nursing Care (American Association of Colleges of Nursing & the John A. Hartford Foundation Institute for Geriatric Nursing, 2000). This article describes how the SON task force planned and implemented a new and strengthened geriatric core in its curricula.     

When the trauma patient is elderly

Each year thousands of older adults will suffer trauma injuries. Geriatric patients who sustain serious injuries are at risk for increased morbidity and mortality. Preexisting medical conditions can dramatically impact every aspect of care in older patients. As a direct response to the stress of injury, reserve functioning can be put to the test. Vital signs may initially appear normal. However, compensatory mechanisms in older individuals may not be predictable in response to physiological needs. Perianesthesia nurses caring for older trauma patients should be familiar with the anatomical and physiological changes of aging, and have an awareness of the original mechanism of injury, coupled with the surgical procedure and anesthesia agents. Astute nursing assessments using critical thinking skills, together with effective nursing interventions, provide the framework for understanding and managing geriatric trauma patients in the perianesthesia care continuum.     

Use of hypodermoclysis to manage dehydration

Older people, particularly those who are frail, are vulnerable to dehydration. Management of dehydration in older people can be more complex than in younger adults because of the physical effects of ageing. As the population ages, nurses will increasingly care for older patients in every setting. This article provides an overview of the physiological changes that affect the ability of older people to maintain a normal fluid balance. Risk factors for dehydration are reviewed and strategies for the prevention, detection and management of dehydration are discussed. The article focuses on subcutaneous fluid replacement for the management of dehydration in older adults.     

Medical treatments and cares for geriatric syndrome: new strategies learned from frail elderly

In Japan, there are 21 million older people above 65 years, and about 8% of them are frail elderly. Geriatrics is to study the frail elderly as to why they become frail elderly, and to treat patients properly or the remaining 92% older people not to become frail elderly. In order to promote health of the older people, geriatricians have to take deep insights for cares as well as medical treatments. With such a will, we find the way to prevent diseases in the older people. In this review, we describe medical treatments and cares for promoting successful aging.     

A network-based geriatric rehabilitation programme: study design and baseline characteristics of the patients

The objective of this paper is to present the design and participants of an ongoing randomized controlled trial on a network-based geriatric rehabilitation programme, targeted at frail elderly persons with progressively declining health and a high risk of institutionalization. Forty-one municipalities, seven rehabilitation centres and a total of 741 frail elderly (65+years) community-living persons participated in the study. Assessments included measurements of physical capacity (balance, handgrip strength, walking speed), Functional Independence Measure, Geriatric Depression Scale, 15 Dimension quality of life questionnaire and Mini Mental State Examination. Questionnaires covered physical, social and psychological factors. The participants were old (mean age 78 years, range 65-96) and mainly female (86%). They were physically frail and most of them (66%) had experienced deterioration of health within 1 year. The majority lived alone (72%) and received regular help from other people (99%). The mean Mini Mental State Examination and Geriatric Depression Scale scores were 25.2 and 4.1 points, respectively. Depressive mood (Geriatric Depression Scale>6 points) was found in 17% and declined cognitive function (Mini Mental State Examination<24 points) in 28% of the participants. Differences between the randomized intervention and control groups were insignificant. Since the number of participants is sufficient statistically, the prospects for evaluating the effectiveness of the programme, and identifying potential benefactors, are good.     

Review of cognitive impairment with antimuscarinic agents in elderly patients with overactive bladder

Overactive bladder (OAB) will become an increasingly prevalent problem as the proportion of older people in the population increases over the next 20 years. In addition to the urological symptoms (urinary urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, usually with increased daytime frequency and nocturia), OAB is associated with other problems in older patients, especially an increased risk of falls and fractures. The bother caused by OAB needs not be an inevitable consequence of ageing, because the symptoms can usually be alleviated, even in frail older people. Pharmacological treatment for OAB involves the use of antimuscarinic agents, whose efficacy and safety profiles depend on their interactions with muscarinic receptors that are widely distributed throughout the body. Interactions between antimuscarinics and M₁ receptors in the central nervous system may have the potential to cause cognitive impairment in older people, depending on muscarinic receptor binding profiles, lipophilicity and the ability to cross the blood brain barrier. Concerns over the possibility of cognitive impairment have contributed to an under‐utilisation of antimuscarinics in the geriatric population, despite the high prevalence and severity of OAB in older subjects. Antimuscarinic agents should be actively considered for elderly patients with OAB, but it is desirable to establish the cognitive risk for every type of antimuscarinic, using robust cognition assessment methods.     

Motor performance deteriorates with simultaneously performed cognitive tasks in geriatric patients

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether simultaneous cognitive tasks influence maximal motor performance in frail geriatric patients with a history of injurious falls and different levels of cognitive function. DESIGN: Experimental 3-group design. SETTING: Geriatric rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two healthy, young adults (mean age +/- standard deviation, 27.7 +/- 9y) and 23 geriatric patients (mean age, 80.9 +/- 5.4y) with a history of injurious falls with (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score, 20.5 +/- 1.6) and without (MMSE score, 28.1 +/- 1.2) cognitive impairment. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Motor performance: peak and integral of maximal isometric strength of leg extensors. Cognition: semiautomated calculation steps (serial 2 forward) and nonautomated calculation steps derived from the MMSE (serial 7 retro). Motor and cognitive performances were examined as single and dual tasks. RESULTS: In frail geriatric patients, especially in patients with cognitive impairment, maximal motor performance decreased significantly during all dual tasks. Cognitive performance was reduced, depending on the task and group. CONCLUSION: In frail or cognitively impaired geriatric patients, additional tasks can substantially decrease maximal motor performance. Insufficient resources on dual tasking may thus be a link in connecting the high incidence of falls with frailty and cognitive impairment in geriatric patients with a history of injurious falls.     

Are interventions recommended by pharmacists during Home Medicines Review evidence‐based?

Introduction Over the past decade medication review services have been implemented in many countries, including Australia, UK and USA. Although, the attitudes and barriers to the implementation of evidence‐based medicine have been investigated, the extent to which medication review recommendations are evidence‐based is not known. Objective To determine (1) the extent to which pharmacist's recommendations during medication review services were consistent with the evidence‐based guides at the time of the review; and (2) the nature and extent of drug‐related problems (DRPs) and the actions recommended by pharmacists to resolve DRPs. Method A retrospective review of Home Medicines Review cases performed on 224 community‐dwelling older people (65 years or older). The chi‐squared test for categorical variables was used to compare the proportion of recommendations that were evidence‐based and recommendations for which no evidence could be identified in the most common Australian information sources. DRPs and the actions recommended to resolve the DRPs were classified according to previously employed criteria. Results Pharmacists made a total of 1114 therapeutic recommendations to general practitioners, of which 964 required supporting pharmacotherapeutic evidence. The majority (94%) of the pharmacists' recommendations were in accordance with the evidence‐based guides, as compared with the recommendations for which no evidence could be identified (P < 0.001). Pharmacists reported that 98% of the patients had at least one problem with use of their medication detected. Conclusion The majority of the actions recommended by pharmacists during the medication review process were consistent with the literature embedded in key Australian information sources. Medication management in older people is complex and challenging, as highlighted by the DRPs identified in 98% of our patients. A suitably trained pharmacist, with full access to the patient, medical record and supporting resources, can help to improve the quality use of medicines in this at‐risk population.     

Hospital discharge planning for frail older people and their family. Are we delivering best practice? A review of the evidence

Aims and objectives. This paper examined the available evidence concerning hospital discharge practices for frail older people and their family caregivers and what practices were most beneficial for this group. Background. Hospital discharge practices are placing an increasing burden of care on the family caregiver. Discharge planning and execution is significant for older patients where inadequate practices can be linked to adverse outcomes and an increased risk of readmission. Design. Literature review. Methods. A review of English language literature published after 1995 on hospital discharge of frail older people and family carer’s experiences. Results. Numerous factors impact on the hospital discharge planning of the frail older person and their family carer’s that when categorised focus on the role that discharge planning plays in bridging the gap between the care provided in hospital and the care needed in the community, its potential to reduce the length of hospital stay, the impact of the discharge process on family carer’s and the need for a coordinated health professional approach that includes dissemination of information, clear communication and active support. Conclusion. The current evidence indicates that hospital discharge planning for frail older people can be improved if interventions address family inclusion and education, communication between health care workers and family, interdisciplinary communication and ongoing support after discharge. Interventions should commence well before discharge. Relevance to clinical practice. An awareness of how the execution of the hospital discharge plan is perceived by the principal family carer of a frail older person, will allow nurses and others involved with the discharge process to better reconcile the family caregivers’ needs and expectations with the discharge process offered by their facility. The research shows there is a direct correlation between the quality of discharge planning and readmission to hospital.     

The development and evolution of geriatric assessment teams over the past 25 years: a cross-cultural comparison of the US and the UK

Findings from a literature synthesis and content analysis of the geriatric assessment team literature from the US and the UK over the past 25 years (1974-1999) are presented. Eighty-one geriatric assessment teams identified from the literature are analyzed (52 from the US and 29 from the UK). Geriatric assessment team characteristics are examined including team purpose, team setting, treatment link, team orientation, team composition, team size, and the client group targeted. The results show that teams in both the US and UK primarily have testing treatment effectiveness as their stated purpose, have strong treatment links, and are patient-oriented. Significant differences exist between the US and UK in terms of team setting, team composition, team size, and patients targeted by team. The US teams examined are more likely to operate in inpatient settings, include more disciplines and have more members on the team, and target specific subgroups of older people than those from the UK.