Delayed diagnosis of appendicitis in children treated with antibiotics

The diagnosis of appendicitis in children can be difficult. Misdiagnosis may result in empirical treatment with antibiotics. The aim of this study was to determine whether initial treatment with antibiotics hindered subsequent diagnosis of appendicitis. Retrospective review of 311 children treated for appendicitis between 1999 and 2004. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1: (n = 45) received antibiotics prior to a definitive diagnosis of appendicitis. Group 2: (n = 266) did not receive antibiotics prior to a diagnosis of appendicitis. Group 1 patients were significantly younger and more likely to be female than in group 2. Abdominal tenderness was less marked and there was a greater reliance on radiological investigations in patients receiving antibiotics. C-reactive protein and pre-operative temperature were significantly higher in group 1 patients compared to group 2. The perforation rate and complication rate were significantly greater in group 1. The commonest misdiagnoses were urinary tract infection and respiratory infection. Initial misdiagnosis results in significant delay before appendicectomy. This study shows that the clinical signs of acute appendicitis can be masked by prior treatment with antibiotics. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis must be considered and, if necessary, excluded in all children seen with abdominal pain who have recently been treated with antibiotics.Presented at 52nd Annual International Congress of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons. Dublin, Ireland, July 2005.     

The effect of the broad-spectrum antibiotics for prevention of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess in pediatric acute appendicitis

Background

We investigated the efficacy of broad-spectrum antibiotics for prevention of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess in pediatric acute appendicitis with our 3 risk factors:—WBC?>?16.5 (×?10³/µl), CRP?>?3.1 (mg/dl) and appendix maximum short diameter on diagnostic imaging?>?11.4 mm.

Methods

Four hundred twenty-two patients were reviewed. Patients with 0–1 risk factors were assessed as low-risk and those with 2–3 were high-risk. In the low-risk group, Group A (n?=?66) patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics and Group B patients (n?=?265) received narrow-spectrum monotherapy. In the high-risk group, Group C patients (n?=?63) received broad-spectrum antibiotics and Group D patients (n?=?28), narrow-spectrum antibiotics. The outcomes were the incidence of postoperative abscess and the total duration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics.

Results

The incidence of intra-abdominal abscess was 6.06% in Group A versus 1.89% in Group B (p?=?0.08), and 19.05% in Group C versus 3.57% in Group D (p?=?0.06). Total IV antibiotic duration (days) were 6.12?±?2.87 in Group A versus 3.83?±?0.69 in Group B (p?<?0.01), and 7.84?±?4.57 in Group C versus 4.00?±?0.82 in Group D (p?<?0.01).

Conclusion

Broad-spectrum antibiotics did not prevent postoperative intra-abdominal abscess in either low or high-risk groups.

     

Perforation associated with barium enema in acute appendicitis

A child with the suspected diagnosis of atypical acute appendicitis underwent a diagnostic barium enema. The study was complicated by perforation with leakage of a large amount of barium into the peritoneal cavity. The complex hospital course that resulted has prompted us to reevaluate the barium enema in the diagnosis of appendicitis and review the literature for contraindications. We conclude that this particular complication is extremely rare and that barium enema still has a part to play in some patients where the clinical diagnosis is uncertain.     

Severity of appendicitis correlates with the pediatric appendicitis score

Purpose  

The pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) has been used as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of acute abdominal pain. Our institution has utilized this scoring system as part of a clinical pathway for acute appendicitis. We sought to discover if the PAS could also serve as a prognostic indicator.     

Urinary biomarkers in pediatric appendicitis

Purpose

The diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis is still a challenge, resulting in perforation and negative appendectomies. The aim of this study was to evaluate novel biomarkers in urine and to use the most promising biomarkers in conjunction with the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS), to see whether this could improve the accuracy of diagnosing appendicitis.

Methods

A prospective study of children with suspected appendicitis was conducted with assessment of PAS, routine blood tests, and measurements of four novel urinary biomarkers: leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein (LRG), calprotectin, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and substance P. The biomarkers were blindly determined with commercial ELISAs. Urine creatinine was used to adjust for dehydration. The diagnosis of appendicitis was based on histopathological analysis.

Results

Forty-four children with suspected appendicitis were included, of which twenty-two (50 %) had confirmed appendicitis. LRG in urine was elevated in children with appendicitis compared to children without (p < 0.001), and was higher in children with gangrenous and perforated appendicitis compared to those with phlegmonous appendicitis (p = 0.003). No statistical significances between groups were found for calprotectin, IL-6 or substance P. LRG had a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.86 (95 % CI 0.79–0.99), and a better diagnostic performance than all routine blood tests. LRG in conjunction with PAS showed 95 % sensitivity, 90 % specificity, 91 % positive predictive value, and 95 % negative predictive value.

Conclusion

LRG, adjusted for dehydration, is a promising novel urinary biomarker for appendicitis in children. LRG in combination with PAS has a high diagnostic performance.

     

Missed opportunities in the treatment of pediatric appendicitis

Introduction

This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of in-hospital delay and determine associated co-morbidities in the treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of the national inpatient sample from 2000 to 2008. Immediate treatment was defined as treatment in hospital day 0 or 1. Delay in treatment was defined as treatment in hospital day 2 and beyond.

Results

During the study period, 683,016 pediatric appendicitis were identified. 17,737 (2.6?%) experienced a delay in treatment. Multivariate analysis identified associated co-morbidities for delay in treatment: ALL (OR 12.84, CI 11.04–14.94), AML (OR 9.41, CI 7.58–11.68), neutropenia (OR 5.53, CI 4.60–6.65), and ovarian cyst without torsion (OR 3.17, CI 2.94–3.42). Surgical management included more than 13-fold increase in drainage procedures (5.5 vs. 0.4?%), sixfold increase in cecectomy (1.2 vs. 0.2?%), 14-fold increase in hemicolectomy (1.4 vs. 0.1?%), 11-fold increase in small bowel laceration suture repair (1.1 vs. 0.1?%), and 15-fold increase in small bowel resection (1.5 vs. 0.1?%).

Conclusions

In-hospital delay beyond 2?days is associated with significant negative outcomes with regard to complications, economic burden, and subsequent surgical management. Using the co-morbidity index, high-risk co-morbidities with associated delay in treatment were identified.     

Prophylactic antibiotics in pediatric surgery

The frequency and appropriateness of prophylactic antibiotic use in children less than 6 years of age who received surgery were examined. Antibiotics were prescribed for 62% of children who had surgery, and prophylaxis was the sole reason for antibiotic use in 73% of the patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered inappropriately with respect to timing or duration to 42% of the children receiving preoperative prophylaxis, 67% receiving intraoperative prophylaxis, and 55% receiving postoperative prophylaxis. Thus, prophylaxis alone is the major indication for antibiotic use in pediatric surgical patients, and prophylactic antibiotics are frequently administered inappropriately.     

MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis: case interpretation

As utilization of MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis becomes more common, there will be increased focus on case interpretation. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to share our institution’s case interpretation experience. MRI findings of appendicitis include appendicoliths, tip appendicitis, intraluminal fluid–debris level, pitfalls of size measurements, and complications including abscesses. The normal appendix and inguinal appendix are also discussed.     

Beyond acute appendicitis: imaging of additional pathologies of the pediatric appendix

Primary acute appendicitis is by far the most common pathological condition affecting the appendix. There are differential diagnoses, however, when an abnormal appendix is found by imaging. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the imaging and clinical manifestations of less common appendiceal abnormalities in children. Familiarity with these alternative diagnoses might be particularly helpful in guiding management of the child whose clinical presentation is not typical for primary acute appendicitis.     

MRI for clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis: an implemented program

Background

Emergent MRI is now a viable alternative to CT for evaluating appendicitis while avoiding the detrimental effects of ionizing radiation. However, primary employment of MRI in the setting of clinically suspected pediatric appendicitis has remained significantly underutilized.

Objective

To describe our institution’s development and the results of a fully implemented clinical program using MRI as the primary imaging evaluation for children with suspected appendicitis.

Materials and methods

A four-sequence MRI protocol consisting of coronal and axial single-shot turbo spin-echo (SS-TSE) T2, coronal spectral adiabatic inversion recovery (SPAIR), and axial SS-TSE T2 with fat saturation was performed on 208 children, ages 3 to 17?years, with clinically suspected appendicitis. No intravenous or oral contrast material was administered. No sedation was administered. Data collection includes two separate areas: time parameter analysis and MRI diagnostic results.

Results

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for pediatric appendicitis indicated a sensitivity of 97.6% (CI: 87.1–99.9%), specificity 97.0% (CI: 93.2–99.0%), positive predictive value 88.9% (CI: 76.0–96.3%), and negative predictive value 99.4% (CI: 96.6–99.9%). Time parameter analysis indicated clinical feasibility, with time requested to first sequence obtained mean of 78.7 +/? 52.5?min, median 65?min; first-to-last sequence time stamp mean 14.2 +/? 8.8?min, median 12?min; last sequence to report mean 57.4 +/? 35.2?min, median 46?min. Mean age was 11.2 +/? 3.6?years old. Girls represented 57% of patients.

Conclusion

MRI is an effective and efficient method of imaging children with clinically suspected appendicitis. Using an expedited four-sequence protocol, sensitivity and specificity are comparable to CT while avoiding the detrimental effects of ionizing radiation.     

Staged imaging pathway for the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis

Purpose

Despite significant radiation exposure involved with computed tomography (CT) in evaluation of pediatric appendicitis, its use is still widespread. The goal of this study was to assess the effect of a staged imaging pathway for appendicitis to significantly decrease CT use while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

Chart review was performed for patients evaluated for appendicitis over a 12-month period prior to and after pathway implementation.

Results

There was a significant decrease in CT use as initial imaging after implementation of the pathway; 87.1–13.4 % for evaluations positive for appendicitis (decrease 84.6 %, p < 0.0001) and 82.6–9.2 % for evaluations negative for appendicitis (decrease 88.9 %, p < 0.0001). Use of CT during any point in the evaluation decreased from 91.7 to 25.1 % (decrease 72.6 %, p < 0.0001). The negative appendectomy rate was similar; 5.4 % prior, 4.9 % post (p = 0.955). The missed appendicitis rate did not statistically change; 1.1 % prior, 3.7 % post (p = 0.523). The perforation rate was not statistically altered; 6.5 % prior; 9.8 % post (p = 0.421). 350 less patients underwent CT during the year following the pathway.

Conclusions

The staged imaging pathway resulted in a marked decrease in children exposed to CT without compromising diagnostic accuracy.